including grantee voices: the good, the bad and the ugly
DESCRIPTION
Including Grantee Voices: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. Laura C. Leviton, Ph.D. Senior Adviser for Evaluation March 7, 2014. Guiding Principles for Evaluators. D. Respect for People # 5 : Where feasible… foster social equity in evaluation - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Including Grantee Voices: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815c3f550346895dca40c9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Including Grantee Voices:The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
Laura C. Leviton, Ph.D.Senior Adviser for Evaluation
March 7, 2014
![Page 2: Including Grantee Voices: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815c3f550346895dca40c9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Guiding Principles for Evaluators
D. Respect for People#5: Where feasible… foster social equity in evaluation
E. Responsibilities for the General and Public Welfare#1: When planning and reporting evaluations, include relevant
perspectives and interests of the full range of stakeholders
#3: Actively disseminate information to stakeholders as resources allow
#4: Maintain a balance between client needs and other needs.
#5: Go beyond analysis of particular stakeholder interests and consider the welfare of society as a whole
www.eval.org/
![Page 3: Including Grantee Voices: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815c3f550346895dca40c9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The Ugly… An Example
Power differential +
Expediency = Unfair evaluation
![Page 4: Including Grantee Voices: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815c3f550346895dca40c9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Other Stakeholders May Deserve a Voice
Available at RWJF.org / Publications / Evaluation tools
![Page 5: Including Grantee Voices: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815c3f550346895dca40c9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Does the Grantee Call the Shots?
• Depends on the purpose of the evaluation:
– Accountability
– Learning
– Program Improvement• Capacity of the grantee
![Page 6: Including Grantee Voices: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815c3f550346895dca40c9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Planning for Input
Who speaks for the grantee? • Especially community grantees!
Don’t expect all sweetness and light…• This is evaluation, after all!
![Page 7: Including Grantee Voices: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815c3f550346895dca40c9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
An Ugly Duckling
Anger is to be expected,When communities are neglected. But that’s not the end of the story…
![Page 8: Including Grantee Voices: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815c3f550346895dca40c9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Ten Years Later:
A long-standing community collaborative and a helpful evaluation
![Page 9: Including Grantee Voices: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815c3f550346895dca40c9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
“Infrastructure of Trust”
http://depts.washington.edu/ccph/commbas.html#Principles
“Community-based participatory research is a "collaborative approach to research that equitably involves all partners in the research process and recognizes the unique strengths that each brings. CBPR begins with a research topic of importance to the community, has the aim of combining knowledge with action and achieving social change to improve health outcomes and eliminate health disparities."
WK Kellogg Foundation Community Health Scholars Program
![Page 10: Including Grantee Voices: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815c3f550346895dca40c9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
“Infrastructure of Trust”
RWJF national program • Linking community interventions
to asthma care• Evaluation engaged these
collaboratives• Quality of collaborative was
associated with fewer asthma episodes
![Page 11: Including Grantee Voices: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815c3f550346895dca40c9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
But Can It Be Done at Scale?
Yes. Example: Salud America!
• The RWJF Research Network to Prevent Latino Childhood Obesity
• Developed priorities for study• Delphi process of 318 community leaders, researchers
and health groups• Network is now > 2,000 people.
![Page 12: Including Grantee Voices: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815c3f550346895dca40c9/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Summary
The Good: Knowing how to engage stakeholdersThe Bad: Philanthropy just does not do it muchThe Ugly: Not caring.
![Page 13: Including Grantee Voices: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56815c3f550346895dca40c9/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Getting to Good:
Expect messy processStick with itBuild infrastructure of trustBalance quality and engagement