inadmissible duplicate deception & fraud evidence

8/8/2019 Inadmissible Duplicate Deception & Fraud Evidence

1/19

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT

IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA

BANKUNITED [non-party]

as [purported]successor in interestto [LAWFULLY SEIZED] BANKUNITED, FSB.,

purported plaintiff

vs. DISPOSED CASE NO.: 09-6016-CA

JENNIFER FRANKLIN-PRESCOTT, et al.___________________________________________________________________________/

INADMISSIBLE DUPLICATE DECEPTION & FRAUD EVIDENCE,

IN SUPPORT OF SANCTIONS AGAINST ALBERTELLI LAW & CAMNER LIPSITZ,

CH. 90, SECTION 90.953, FLORIDA STATUTES

1. In violation of Floridas Evidence Code, Ch. 90, F.S., Attorneys at Camner Lipsitz and/or

Albertelli Law agreed to defraud by means ofinadmissible duplicates of a purported note:

TITLE VIIEVIDENCE

CHAPTER 90

EVIDENCE CODE

90.953

[In] Admissibility of duplicates.

A duplicate is admissible to the same extent as an original, unless:

(1)

The document or writing is a negotiable instrument as defined in s.673.1041,a security as defined in s.678.1021, or any other writing that evidences a

right to the payment of money, is not itself a security agreement or lease, and

is of a type that is transferred by delivery in the ordinary course of business

with any necessary endorsement or assignment.

(2)
http://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0000-0099/0090/0090ContentsIndex.html&StatuteYear=2010&Title=-%3E2010-%3EChapter%2090http://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0000-0099/0090/0090ContentsIndex.html&StatuteYear=2010&Title=-%3E2010-%3EChapter%2090http://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0000-0099/0090/0090ContentsIndex.html&StatuteYear=2010&Title=-%3E2010-%3EChapter%2090http://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0000-0099/0090/0090ContentsIndex.html&StatuteYear=2010&Title=-%3E2010-%3EChapter%2090http://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.953.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0600-0699/0673/Sections/0673.1041.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0600-0699/0673/Sections/0673.1041.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0600-0699/0678/Sections/0678.1021.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0600-0699/0678/Sections/0678.1021.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0000-0099/0090/0090ContentsIndex.html&StatuteYear=2010&Title=-%3E2010-%3EChapter%2090http://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0000-0099/0090/0090ContentsIndex.html&StatuteYear=2010&Title=-%3E2010-%3EChapter%2090http://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0000-0099/0090/0090ContentsIndex.html&StatuteYear=2010&Title=-%3E2010-%3EChapter%2090http://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0000-0099/0090/0090ContentsIndex.html&StatuteYear=2010&Title=-%3E2010-%3EChapter%2090http://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.953.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0600-0699/0673/Sections/0673.1041.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0600-0699/0678/Sections/0678.1021.html


2/19

A genuine question is raised about the authenticity of the original or any other

document or writing.

(3)

It is unfair [NO PROTECTION], under the circumstance, to admit the duplicate

in lieu of the original.

History.

s. 1, ch. 76-237; s. 1, ch. 77-77; s. 22, ch. 78-361; s. 1, ch. 78-379; s. 57, ch. 92-82; s. 29,

ch. 99-2.

90.101

Short title.

90.102Construction.

90.103

Scope; applicability.

90.104

Rulings on evidence.

90.105

Preliminary questions.

90.106

Summing up and comment by judge.

90.107

Limited admissibility.

90.108

Introduction of related writings or recorded statements.

90.201

Matters which must be judicially noticed.

90.202

Matters which may be judicially noticed.90.203

Compulsory judicial notice upon request.

90.204

Determination of propriety of judicial notice and nature of matter noticed.

90.205

Denial of a request for judicial notice.

2
http://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.101.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.102.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.103.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.104.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.105.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.106.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.107.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.108.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.201.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.202.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.203.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.204.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.205.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.101.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.102.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.103.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.104.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.105.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.106.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.107.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.108.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.201.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.202.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.203.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.204.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.205.html


3/19

90.206

Instructing jury on judicial notice.

90.207

Judicial notice by trial court in subsequent proceedings.

90.301

Presumption defined; inferences.

90.302

Classification of rebuttable presumptions.

90.303

Presumption affecting the burden of producing evidence defined.

90.304

Presumption affecting the burden of proof defined.

90.401Definition of relevant evidence.

90.402

Admissibility of relevant evidence.

90.4025

Admissibility of paternity determination in certain criminal prosecutions.

90.4026

Statements expressing sympathy; admissibility; definitions.

90.403

Exclusion on grounds of prejudice or confusion.

90.404

Character evidence; when admissible.

90.405

Methods of proving character.

90.406

Routine practice.

90.407

Subsequent remedial measures.90.408

Compromise and offers to compromise.

90.409

Payment of medical and similar expenses.

90.410

Offer to plead guilty; nolo contendere; withdrawn pleas of guilty.

3
http://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.206.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.207.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.301.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.302.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.303.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.304.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.401.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.402.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.4025.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.4026.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.403.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.404.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.405.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.406.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.407.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.408.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.409.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.410.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.206.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.207.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.301.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.302.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.303.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.304.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.401.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.402.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.4025.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.4026.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.403.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.404.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.405.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.406.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.407.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.408.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.409.htmlhttp://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0000-0099/0090/Sections/0090.410.html


4/19

90.501

Privileges recognized only as provided.

90.5015

Journalists privilege.

90.502

Lawyer-client privilege.

90.503

Psychotherapist-patient privilege.

90.5035

Sexual assault counselor-victim privilege.

90.5036

Domestic violence advocate-victim privilege.

90.504Husband-wife privilege.

90.505

Privilege with respect to communications to clergy.

90.5055

Accountant-client privilege.

90.506

Privilege with respect to trade secrets.

90.507

Waiver of privilege by voluntary disclosure.

90.508

Privileged matter disclosed under compulsion or without opportunity to claim privilege.

90.509

Application of privileged communication.

90.510

Privileged communication necessary to adverse party.

90.601

General rule of competency.90.603

Disqualification of witness.

90.604

Lack of personal knowledge.

90.605

Oath or affirmation of witness.

4


5/19

90.606

Interpreters and translators.

90.6063

Interpreter services for deaf persons.

90.607

Competency of certain persons as witnesses.

90.608

Who may impeach.

90.609

Character of witness as impeachment.

90.610

Conviction of certain crimes as impeachment.

90.611Religious beliefs or opinions.

90.612

Mode and order of interrogation and presentation.

90.613

Refreshing the memory of a witness.

90.614

Prior statements of witnesses.

90.615

Calling witnesses by the court.

90.616

Exclusion of witnesses.

90.701

Opinion testimony of lay witnesses.

90.702

Testimony by experts.

90.703

Opinion on ultimate issue.90.704

Basis of opinion testimony by experts.

90.705

Disclosure of facts or data underlying expert opinion.

90.706

Authoritativeness of literature for use in cross-examination.

5


6/19

90.801

Hearsay; definitions; exceptions.

90.802

Hearsay rule.

90.803

Hearsay exceptions; availability of declarant immaterial.

90.804

Hearsay exceptions; declarant unavailable.

90.805

Hearsay within hearsay.

90.806

Attacking and supporting credibility of declarant.

90.901Requirement of authentication or identification.

90.902

Self-authentication.

90.903

Testimony of subscribing witness unnecessary.

90.91

Photographs of property wrongfully taken; use in prosecution, procedure; return of property to

owner.

90.951

Definitions.

90.952

Requirement of originals.

90.953

Admissibility of duplicates.

90.954

Admissibility of other evidence of contents.

90.955Public records.

90.956

Summaries.

90.957

Testimony or written admissions of a party.

90.958Functions of court and jury.

6


7/19

FLORIDA SENATE STAFF ANALYSIS, SB 282

2. Florida [then] Senator William Bill Posey sponsored SB 282. Senate Staff analyzed the

effect of said Bill, 02/02/2004:

The bill [SB 282], however, may not rejectthe result in State Street Bank and Trust

Co. v. Lord, 851 So. 2d 790 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). A person seeking to enforce a lostnegotiable instrument will still have to prove that the person has acquired the rightto enforce the lost instrument. In order to prove that a person has acquired ownership

of a lost negotiable instrument, including the right to enforce the lost instrument, the

person will likely have to prove WHO owned the instrument WHEN the instrument

was lost. According to State Street, the assignee of a lost note did not produceevidence showing WHICH prior assignor lost the note. State Street, 851 So. 2d at

792.

Here, said Florida Senate analysis was further conclusive evidence of the fraud on the

Court in this disposed Case. Because of the lawful seizure, F.D.I.C., of BankUnited, FSB,

BankUnited, e.g.:

a. Had no rightto enforce any note;b. Had no right to sue Jennifer Franklin Prescott.

c. Was not anyproper party;

d. Had nostanding.

7


8/19

8


9/19

AUTOMATIC DISSOLUTION OF lis pendens NOTICE, AND

DEMAND FOR RECORDING UNDER RULE 1.420(f), FLA.R.CIV.P.

3. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the notice of lis pendens connected with the

08/12/2010 Final Disposition was automatically dissolved at said time pursuant to Rule

1.420 (f), Fla.R.Civ.P. Here, the notice, stipulation, or order shall be recorded.

WHEREFORE, Jennifer Franklin Prescott demands that the NOTICE OF AUTOMATIC

DISSOLUTION OF [FRAUDULENT] lis pendens, Rule 1.420 (f), be recorded accordingly.

See attached Docket.

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH STATUTES AND STATE A CAUSE OF ACTION

4. If a party is not in possession of the original note and cannot reestablish it, the party

cannot prevail in an action on the note. In Dasma Investments, LLC v. Realty Associates

Fund III, L.P., 459 F.Supp.2d 1294 (S.D.Fla.2006) the court explained that in Florida a

promissory note is a negotiable instrument and that a party suing on a promissory note,

whether just on the note itself or together with aforeclose on a mortgagesecuring the note,

must be in possession of the original of the note orreestablish the note pursuant to Fla. Stat.

673.3091. Shelter Dev. Group, Inc. v. Mma of Georgia, Inc., 50 B.R. 588, 590 (Bkrtcy.

S.D. Fla.1985).

LAWFULLY SEIZED BANKUNITEDS FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CH. 673, F.S.

5. A party must comply with section 673.3091, Florida Statues, in order to enforce a lost,

destroyed orstolennegotiable instrument. Here, lawfully seized BankUnited, FSB [F.D.I.C.

seizure]

a. FAILED to state that the creditors ever received possession of any original

promissory note;b. FAILED tostate a cause of action;

c. FAILED tosatisfy the conditions precedentto sue, Ch. 673, Florida Statutes;

d. COULD NOTpossibly have complied withsection 673.3091, Florida Statues.

RECORD LACK OFpromissory note

9


10/19

6. The original document that is generally required to be filed with the court in a mortgage

foreclosure proceeding is the promissory note, not the mortgage. The Evidence Code

provides the rationale for this conclusion. Section 90.952, Florida Statutes (2002), indicates

that original documents are required to prove the contents of a writing.

7. A promissory note is a negotiableinstrumentwithin the definition of

section 673.1041(1), and either the original must be produced, or the lost document must be

reestablishedunder section 673.3091, Florida Statutes (2002). See Mason v. Rubin, 727 So.

2d 283 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); see also Downing v. First Nat'l Bank of Lake City, 81 So. 2d

486 (Fla. 1955); Thompson v. First Union Nat'l Bank, 673 So. 2d 1179 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994);

Figueredo v. Bank Espirito Santo, 537 So. 2d 1113 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

LAWFULLY SEIZED BANKUNITED HAD NO right to the payment of money

8. Here, nowritingon file evidencedany right to the payment of money by lawfully seized

bankrupt bankBankUnited, FSB, Ch. 673, Florida Statutes.

JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT DEMANDED PROTECTION FROM FRAUD

9. Because it is negotiable, the promissory note must be surrendered in a foreclosure

proceedingso that it does not remain in the stream of commerce. Indeed, if the foreclosing

party alleges that the note is lost,destroyed orstolen, the trial court is authorized by statute

to take the necessary actions to protect the party purportedly required to pay the note against

loss that might occur by reason of a claim by another party to enforce the instrument. See

section 673.3091(2), Fla. Stat. (2002).

10. A mortgage is the security for the payment of the negotiable promissory note, and is a

mere incident of and ancillary to such note.

08/12/2010 FINAL DISPOSITION FOR LACK OF proper plaintiff

LAWFULLY SEIZED BANKUNITED, FSB, HAD NO interest& NOstanding

10


11/19

11. Here, the admittedloss, the time and manner of which was unknown, was

a. the result of a transfer orlawful seizure, [F.D.I.C.], Ch. 673, Florida Statutes;b. precluded any establishmentof any agreementand/orbreach of contract.

BUSTED BANKUNITED FAILED ITS BURDEN

12. Here, the burden was on lawfully seized BankUnited, i.e., the party seeking to enforce

the lost instrument. See 673.3091(2), Fla. Stat. (2008).

PROVEN INVALIDITY OF RECORD

13. Furthermore here, the invalidity had been proven in the pleadings, Fla. Stat. 673.3081

(2008).

14. A court will not enforce an instrumentunless the defendant will be adequately protected

against future claims on the lostnote. Perry v. Fairbanks, 888 So.2d 725, 727, (Fla. 5d DCA

2004).

15. Here, lawfully seized BankUnited FSB, did not have standingto bringand/ormaintain

any mortgage foreclosure action against Jennifer Franklin Prescott, because it had proven on

the record that it did not holdany note and /ormortgage. Here, said admitted and known

non-holderof any note had nostandingto seek any enforcementof the fictitious note.

LAWFUL SEIZURE, FDIC, OF BANKUNITED, FSBS PROPERTY & NOTES

16. The property ofbankruptBankUnited, FSB, was lawfullyseized, Ch. 673, Florida

Statutes. Here in particular, any and all notes and mortgages in the name of failed

BankUnited, FSB, were lawfully seized. Here, lawfully seizedBankUnited, FSB:

a. was not aproper party to bringthis facially fraudulentaction;

b. failed tostate a cause of action;

c. could never , under any circumstances, be the proper plaintiff to bring anyforeclosure action against Jennifer Franklin Prescott.

LAWFUL SEIZURE OF BUSTED BANKUNITED, FSB

11


12/19

17. The admitted loss of the fictitious promissory note was due to lawful seizure of

bankrupt BankUnited, FSB, and/ortransfer. Here, lawfully seizedBankUnited was not

entitled to enforce the fictitiousnote.

SEIZED BANKUNITED FAILED TO COMPLY WITH CONDITION PRECEDENT

18. Here, lawfully seized BankUnited could not have possiblysatisfied the absolutely

required condition precedent, Ch. 673, Florida Statutes.

FRAUDULENT & FALSE PRETENSES - MATERIAL MISREPRESENTATION

19. BankUnited, FSB, fraudulently pretended:

9. On February 15, 2006, Franklin Prescott executed and delivered a promissorynote to Bankunited Complaint, p. 3.

Here on 02/15/2006, BankUnited had not even legally existed.

16.Plaintiff owns and holds the note and mortgage. Complaint, p. 5.

6. Said [fictitious] promissory note and mortgage have been lostordestroyedandare notin the custody or control of BankUnited, and the time and mannerof the loss

or destruction is unknown. Complaint, p. 3.

Here, bankrupt BankUnited did notholdorown any note and mortgage. Here, any and

all notes and mortgages had been seized by a U.S Agency. Here, there was fraud on the

Court, Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.540.

THIS COURTS AUTHORITY TO SANCTION SEIZED BANKS ATTORNEY(S)

20. This court has ample authority to sanctionlawyers and lenders asserting improper and

facially fraudulentforeclosure claims. Here, Federal Agents had lawfully seized bankrupt

BankUnited, FSB. This courts authority to sanction crooked attorneys is explicit in Florida

law and implicit in the courts' inherent power to sanction bad faith litigation.

21. Any party seeking toforeclose a mortgagewithout a good faith belief in the facts giving

rise to the asserted claim may be sanctioned upon the court's initiative. 57.105(1), Fla.

Stat.

12


13/19

22. This statute affords judges the authority to immediately impose significant penalties for

bringing unfounded litigation. See Moakely v. Smallwood, 826 So. 2d 221, 223 (Fla. 2002),

citing United States Savings Bank v. Pittman, 80 Fla. 423, 86 So. 567, 572 (1920)

(sanctioning attorney foracting in bad faith in a mortgage foreclosure sale).

CONFIRMED CANCELLATION

23. On 09/02/2010, at 11:20 AM, the Clerk inside Hearing Room 4-1, Naples Courthouse,

and Bailiff D. Chenoweth confirmed the cancellation of the unauthorized hearing before

judicial imposter Tony Perez and/or Antonio J. Perez-Benitoa.

24. The Court explained that Perez-Benitoa was under contract with this Court for one

day per week. The Court did not disclose Tony Perez credentials.

25. Franklin Prescott contacted the Florida Bar in this matter.

26. Pursuant to the Magistrates Office, Debbie, Supervisor, Melanie [09/02/2010, AM], the

09/02/2010 hearing before judicial imposter Tony Perez was cancelled.

27. Here, the law required use of the legal name of anyjudicial officer. Tony Perez is not

any legal name.

NOTICE OF UNTIMELY notice and entry

28. On the day of the unauthorizedhearing, 09/02/2010, the notice of hearing appeared

for the first time. On 09/01/2010, said notice had not appearedon the Docket.

IMPROPER USE OF NON-LEGAL NAME JUDICIAL IMPOSTER Tony Perez

29. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of Jennifer Franklin Prescotts cancellation of

unauthorized 09/02/2010 hearing because there was

13


14/19

a. Non -consent by J. Franklin Prescott;

b. No order of referralto any magistrate;

c. No notice of hearing;d. Nosetting party of record;

e. Nojurisdiction;

f. Nostanding.

Here, seized and bankrupt BankUnited, FSB, had nostandingand could not have possibly

been anyparty.

30. Pursuant to the Magistrates Office, Supervisor Debbie, Rose, 239-252-8870

a. Jennifer Franklin Prescott faxed her filed and recorded NOTICE OF NON-CONSENT and NOTICE OF OBJECTION to the Magistrates Office;

b. Jennifer Franklin Prescotts MOTION TO DISMISS is not to be heard in the

record absence of any notice of hearing required under the Rules. See Docket of thisdisposed Case.

31. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of Jennifer Franklin Prescotts service of NOTICE OF

DISPOSITION AND NON-CONSENT upon the magistrate and/or Antonio J. Perez-Benitoa

at:

a. Magistrates Office, c/o Supervisor Debbie, Rose

Naples Courthouse5th Floor

Naples, FL 34112,

T: 252-8331, F: 252-8870 and

b. Antonio J. Perez-Benitoa, P.A.

900 Sixth Avenue SouthSuite 303

Naples, Florida 34102

Telephone: 239-430-1884

Fax: 239-30-1885

http://www.tonypblaw.com

32. Jennifer Franklin Prescott, record holder of unencumbered title to the subject property

[address: 25 6th ST North, Naples, Florida 34102] does not consent and objected to any

referral to any magistrate, hearing officer, and/or special master, Rule 1.490, Florida

Rules of Civil Procedure.

14
http://www.tonypblaw.com/http://www.tonypblaw.com/


15/19

JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTTS OBJECTIONS TO ANY magistrate

33. In particular, J. Franklin Prescott objects and did not consentto any magistrate

a. findings of fact;

b. conclusions of law.

MEMORANDUM

A REFERRAL TO A MAGISTRATE REQUIRES THE CONSENT OF ALL

PARTIES. JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT IS ENTITLED TO HAVE THIS

MATTER HEARD BY A JUDGE AND DOES NOT WANT TO HAVE THIS

MATTER HEARD BY ANY MAGISTRATE. JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTTFILE A WRITTEN OBJECTION TO FICTITIOUS referral PRIOR TO

COMMENCEMENT OF THE HEARING.

Here, no hearingcanpossibly commence.

PUBLICLY RECORDED 08/12/2010 FINAL DISPOSITION

34. On 08/12/2010, Def. Judge Hugh D. Hayes disposed of the fraudulent action.

NO order of referral

35. Here, there were

a. 08/12/2010 Final Disposition;

b. No order of referral;

c. No notice of any hearing;d. J. Franklin Prescotts non-consent and objection to any magistrate referraland

hearing.

RECORD LACK OF note and mortgage

36. Here, in the recorded absence of any note and/ormortgage, there was

a. No agreement;

15


16/19

b. No debt;

c. No lien;

d. No BankUnited interest.

LACK OF TIMELY NOTICE OF ANY hearing

37. Court staff asserted and published:

A party/attorney scheduling a hearing must concurrently notice the matter in

conformance with the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and ensure timely notice is

served on all pro se parties and counsel of record in advance of the hearing. Theoriginal notice must be timely filed with the Clerk of Court. The Judges and

Magistrates ask that no courtesy copies be sent to their offices on foreclosure cases

only. The setting party/attorney is responsible for preparing and filing the Order ofReferral pursuant to Rule 1.490, Fl. Civil Rules of Court (also can be found at

www.ca.cjis20.org/web/main/magistrates as a reference, no more signed Order of

Referrals from the above website will be accepted). You will be required to submit

your proposed Order of Referral to the appropriate Judge for each hearing in front

of the Magistrate. This will include all hearings for 10, 15 or 30 minutes and

Special Set hearings. (This will also include any Summary/Default Judgment

hearings requesting more than 5 minutes.)

Here, no notice was servedon Jennifer Franklin Prescott. Here, nothing, no matter, and no

hearingwere noticedin violation of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure.

BANKUNITED, FSBS LACK OFstanding

38. Pursuant to 48.23, Fla. Stat.,

1. A notice oflis pendens must contain the following:

a. The names of the parties.

Here, the fraudulentnotice of lis pendens contained BankUnited, FSB. However here,

said BankUnited was not any note/mortgage holderorparty. Here, U.S. agents had seized

BankUnited, FSB.

39. Furthermore here, Jennifer Franklin-Prescott was mischaracterized as a married woman

and Walter Prescott as her husband. However here, Walter Prescott is not the

16
http://www.ca.cjis20.org/web/main/magistrates_downloads.asphttp://www.ca.cjis20.org/web/main/magistrates_downloads.asp


17/19

husband of Jennifer Franklin Prescott. Here, the notice of lis pendens did not contain the

parties names.

NOjurisdiction

40. Here, BankUnited, FSB was

a. Not anyparty;b. Had no interest;

c. Had nostanding.

Here, bankrupt BankUnited, FSB, had nostanding, and this Court has nojurisdiction.

RECORD APPEAL - NOjurisdiction

41. Here after disposition and J. Franklin Prescotts Notice of Appeal, this Court had no

jurisdiction:

NOTICE OF RELEASE & DISCHARGE OF FRAUDULENT lis pendens, CH. 48, F.S.

42. The fraudulent notice of lis pendens, purported INSTR 4318185, Collier County

Records, has been released and discharged. Here admittedly, no note ormortgage could be

established, Ch. 48, 71, F. S. Purported Plaintiff bankrupt BankUnited failed and was

seized. In the record absence of any note ormortgage, said seized banks fraudulentaction

and notice were null & void and did not operateas a lis pendens, Ch. 48.

43. Furthermore, a lis pendens is not effectual for any purpose beyond 1 year from the

commencement of the action and expires, 48.23, Florida Statutes.

44. Here, the pleadings conclusively proved that no action could be founded on any lost

and/or destroyed note and/or instrument. Therefore, the bankrupt and seized banks non-

17


18/19

meritorious action not possibly affect the subject property, and the court controlled and

discharged the fraudulent notice of lis pendens, 48.23, Fla. Stat. The Docket showed the

08/12/2010 Final Disposition by Def. Judge Hugh D. Hayes.

08/12/2010 FINAL DISPOSITION, FLA.R.CIV.P. 1.998

45. Hereby, prevailing Jennifer Franklin Prescott filed the Final Disposition Form pursuant to

Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.998, 25.075, Florida Statutes. The Docket evidenced

Judge Hugh D. Hayes 08/12/2010 Final Disposition before any hearing.

46. Here, the Docket and official record alterations were

a. Arbitrary and capricious;b. Unlawful.

WHEREFORE, Jennifer Franklin Prescott hereby again demands

1. An Order for the recording of the automatic dissolution of [fraudulent] notice of lis

pendens pursuant to Rule 1.420, Fla.R.Civ.P.;

2. An Order takingjudicial notice, Ch. 92, Fla. Stat., of Ch. 673, Fla. Stat., and the lawful

seizure [F.D.I.C.] ofbusted BankUnited, FSB;

3. An Order takingjudicial notice of Ch. 673, 59, 90, and 92, Fla. Stat.;

4. An Order sanctioning the attorneys of lawfully seized BankUnited, FSB, for their

unfounded and fraudulentaction;

5. An Orderdirecting judicial imposter Tony Perez to use and disclose his legal name.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE AND PUBLICATION

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the above has been furnished to the

purported non-plaintiff, James E. Albertelli, Erin Quinn Rose, and Erin Rowland, Albertelli Law,

P.O. Box 23028, Tampa, FL 33623, judicial imposter Tony Perez, Magistrates Office, Debbie,

Supervisor, Fax: 239-252-8870, and Defendant Judge Hugh D. Hayes, Naples Courthouse, 3301

E. Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 34112, on this 3rd day of September, 2010.

The pleading is also being published worldwide.

18


19/19

________________________

/s/Jennifer Franklin Prescott, Prevailing Victim oflawfully seized BankUniteds record fraud

19

inadmissible duplicate deception & fraud evidence

Documents