in the united states district court for the ......rifkind, wharton & garrison llp, washington,...

98
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ______________________________________________________________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : C.A. No. 19-1548-LPS PUBLIC VERSION SABRE CORP., : SABRE GLBL INC., : FARELOGIX INC., and : SANDLER CAPITAL PARTNERS V, L.P., : : Defendants. : ______________________________________________________________________________ David C. Weiss, Laura D. Hatcher, and Shamoor Anis, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Wilmington, DE Julie S. Elmer, Scott A. Westrich, Sarah P. McDonough, Robert A. Lepore, Aaron Comenetz, Brian E. Hanna, Craig W. Conrath, Dylan M. Carson, Rachel A. Flipse, Michael T. Nash, Jeremy P. Evans, Vittorio Cottafavi, Seth J. Wiener, John A. Holler, Grant A. Bermann, Erin L. Craig, J. Richard Doidge, and Katherine A. Celeste, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, DC Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America Joseph O. Larkin and Veronica A. Bartholomew, SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP, Wilmington, DE Tara L. Reinhart and Steven C. Sunshine, SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP, Washington, DC Matthew M. Martino, Michael H. Menitove, and Evan R. Kreiner, SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP, New York, NY Attorneys for Defendants Sabre Corporation and Sabre GLBL Inc. AMENDED ON APRIL 13, 2020 TO CORRECT ATTORNEY LISTING

Upload: others

Post on 16-Aug-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

______________________________________________________________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ::

Plaintiff, ::

v. ::

C.A. No. 19-1548-LPSPUBLIC VERSION

SABRE CORP., :SABRE GLBL INC., : FARELOGIX INC., and :SANDLER CAPITAL PARTNERS V, L.P., :

:

Defendants. : ______________________________________________________________________________

David C. Weiss, Laura D. Hatcher, and Shamoor Anis, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Wilmington, DE

Julie S. Elmer, Scott A. Westrich, Sarah P. McDonough, Robert A. Lepore, Aaron Comenetz, Brian E. Hanna, Craig W. Conrath, Dylan M. Carson, Rachel A. Flipse, Michael T. Nash, JeremyP. Evans, Vittorio Cottafavi, Seth J. Wiener, John A. Holler, Grant A. Bermann, Erin L. Craig, J.Richard Doidge, and Katherine A. Celeste, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,Washington, DC

Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America

Joseph O. Larkin and Veronica A. Bartholomew, SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER &FLOM LLP, Wilmington, DE

Tara L. Reinhart and Steven C. Sunshine, SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOMLLP, Washington, DC

Matthew M. Martino, Michael H. Menitove, and Evan R. Kreiner, SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE,MEAGHER & FLOM LLP, New York, NY

Attorneys for Defendants Sabre Corporation and Sabre GLBL Inc.

AMENDED ON APRIL 13, 2020TO CORRECT ATTORNEY LISTING

Page 2: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION

Daniel A. Mason, PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Wilmington,DE

Kenneth A. Gallo, Jonathan S. Kanter, Joseph J. Bial, and Daniel J. Howley, PAUL, WEISS,RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC

Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P.

OPINION

April 7, 2020Wilmington, Delaware

Page 3: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 4: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 5: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 6: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 7: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 8: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 9: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 10: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 11: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 12: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 13: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 14: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 15: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 16: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 17: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 18: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 19: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 20: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 21: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 22: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 23: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 24: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 25: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 26: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 27: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 28: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 29: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 30: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 31: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 32: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 33: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 34: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 35: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 36: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 37: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 38: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 39: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 40: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 41: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 42: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 43: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 44: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 45: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 46: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 47: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 48: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 49: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 50: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 51: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 52: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 53: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 54: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 55: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 56: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 57: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 58: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 59: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 60: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 61: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 62: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 63: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 64: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 65: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 66: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 67: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 68: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 69: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 70: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 71: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 72: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 73: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 74: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 75: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 76: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 77: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 78: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 79: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 80: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 81: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 82: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 83: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 84: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 85: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 86: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 87: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 88: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 89: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 90: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 91: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 92: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 93: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 94: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 95: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 96: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 97: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION
Page 98: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE ......RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP, Washington, DC Attorneys for Defendants Farelogix Inc. and Sandler Capital Partners V, L.P. OPINION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

______________________________________________________________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ::

Plaintiff, ::

v. : C.A. No. 19-1548:

SABRE CORP., :SABRE GLBL INC., : FARELOGIX INC., and :SANDLER CAPITAL PARTNERS V, L.P., :

:Defendants. :

______________________________________________________________________________

ORDER

At Wilmington this 7th day of April, 2020:

For the reasons stated in the Opinion issued this same date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that judgment is entered FOR Defendants and AGAINST Plaintiff.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, because the Opinion was issued under seal, the

parties shall meet and confer and provide the Court a proposed redacted version, consistent with

their submission earlier today (see D.I. 271), no later than April 8, 2020 at 10:00 a.m.

Thereafter, the Court will release a public version of its Opinion.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer and, no later than

April 14, 2020, submit a joint status report, advising the Court as to what, if anything, remains to

be done in this case before it is closed.

________________________________HONORABLE LEONARD P. STARKUNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Neil Looby
LPS