in the united states district court for the northern ...€¦ · a. agreed claim construction claim...

37
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION TRANS TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. HENDRICKSON USA L.L.C.; QUEST GLOBAL, INC.; GREAT DANE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-cv-01778-AT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT Plaintiff Trans Technologies Company (“Plaintiff”) and Hendrickson USA L.L.C., Quest Global, Inc., and Great Dane Limited Partnership (“Defendants”) hereby file their Joint Claim Construction Statement pursuant to L.P.R. 6.3 and this Court’s Scheduling Order. (Dkt. No. 55 (referring to Dkt. No. 53)). A. Agreed Claim Construction Claim term Joint Construction plurality two or more Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108 Filed 01/11/17 Page 1 of 37 IPR Page 1 Hendrickson et al v. Trans Tech Hendrickson Ex. 1030

Upload: others

Post on 03-Aug-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ...€¦ · A. Agreed Claim Construction Claim term Joint Construction plurality two or more Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

ATLANTA DIVISION

TRANS TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. HENDRICKSON USA L.L.C.; QUEST GLOBAL, INC.; GREAT DANE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Defendants.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-cv-01778-AT

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT

Plaintiff Trans Technologies Company (“Plaintiff”) and Hendrickson USA

L.L.C., Quest Global, Inc., and Great Dane Limited Partnership (“Defendants”)

hereby file their Joint Claim Construction Statement pursuant to L.P.R. 6.3 and this

Court’s Scheduling Order. (Dkt. No. 55 (referring to Dkt. No. 53)).

A. Agreed Claim Construction

Claim term Joint Construction

plurality two or more

Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108 Filed 01/11/17 Page 1 of 37

IPR Page 1

Hendrickson et al v. Trans Tech Hendrickson Ex. 1030

Page 2: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ...€¦ · A. Agreed Claim Construction Claim term Joint Construction plurality two or more Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108

2

B. Disputed Claim Constructions

In Exhibit A, attached herewith, the parties identify the claim constructions

disputed between the parties at this time and the supporting intrinsic and extrinsic

evidence. In addition, for the convenience of the Court and the parties, and as a

result of representations made in the course of the meet and confer process

between counsel regarding this joint submission, the parties have agreed not to

propose constructions for the remaining terms identified in the parties’ preliminary

claim construction disclosures under LPR 6.1 and 6.2, including the terms and

constructions for which the parties could not identify a meaningful dispute at this

time.

The following Exhibits are attached and cited to in the Disputed Claim

Constructions (Exhibit A): the asserted patent, U.S. Pat. No. 7,669,465 is attached

hereto as Exhibit B; the entire prosecution history of the ’465 Patent is attached

hereto as Exhibit C; Provisional App. No. 60/652,544 is attached hereto as Exhibit

D; Plaintiff’s extrinsic evidence is attached hereto as Exhibit E; and, Defendants

have produced identified extrinsic evidence and will file such evidence to the

extent necessary in connection with claim construction briefing.

Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108 Filed 01/11/17 Page 2 of 37

IPR Page 2

Page 3: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ...€¦ · A. Agreed Claim Construction Claim term Joint Construction plurality two or more Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108

3

C. Anticipated Length of Time Necessary for Claim Construction Hearing

Plaintiff proposes that the Court set aside four hours for the claim

construction hearing.

Defendants anticipate that the claim construction hearing will take four to

six hours depending on whether expert testimony is presented.

D. Witnesses

Plaintiff and Defendants each propose to call one expert witness at the claim

construction hearing.

Plaintiff proposes to call Mr. Joseph W. Lehmann, currently employed as a

consultant with Aventics Corporation in the Bosch Rexroth Pneumatics division. A

summary of his opinion and his curriculum vitae are attached as Exhibit F.

Defendants propose to call Mr. Brett Muckelrath, P.E., currently employed

as a Value Analysis Engineering Lead in the Controls Division of Hendrickson

Trailer Commercial Vehicle Systems. A summary of his opinion is attached as

Exhibit G.

Respectfully submitted this 11th day of January, 2017.

/s/ John L. North /s/ Erika C. Birg

Counsel for Plaintiff (signature) Counsel for Defendants (signature)

Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108 Filed 01/11/17 Page 3 of 37

IPR Page 3

Page 4: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ...€¦ · A. Agreed Claim Construction Claim term Joint Construction plurality two or more Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108

4

John L. North (GA Bar No. 545580) Steven G. Hill (GA Bar No. 354658) Jennifer L. Calvert (GA Bar No. 587191) Vivek Ganti (GA Bar No. 755019) Sharad K. Bijanki (GA Bar No. 467136)

HILL, KERTSCHER & WHARTON, LLP 3350 Riverwood Parkway, Suite 800 Atlanta, Georgia 30339 Tel: (770) 953-0995 Fax: (770) 953-1358 E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Erika C. Birg Georgia Bar No. 058140 Lloyd Farr Georgia Bar No. 255435 NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP 201 17th Street NW, Suite 1700 Atlanta, Georgia 30363

Telephone: (404) 322-6000 Facsimile: (404) 322-6050 [email protected] [email protected]

David L. Applegate Paul J. Ripp WILLIAMS MONTGOMERY & JOHN LTD. 233 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 6100 Chicago, Illinois 60606 Telephone: (312) 443-3200 Facsimile: (312) 630-8500 [email protected] [email protected]

Craig C. Martin Sara Tonnies Horton Michael G. Babbitt JENNER & BLOCK LLP 353 N. Clark Street Chicago, IL 60654-3456 Tel: (312) 923-2776 Fax: (312) 840-7776 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108 Filed 01/11/17 Page 4 of 37

IPR Page 4

Page 5: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ...€¦ · A. Agreed Claim Construction Claim term Joint Construction plurality two or more Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108

A-1

EX

HIB

IT A

DIS

PUT

ED

CL

AIM

CO

NST

RU

CT

ION

S

Cla

im

Nos

. D

ispu

ted

Cla

im T

erm

or

Phr

ase

Plai

ntiff

’s

Prop

osed

C

onst

ruct

ion

Plai

ntiff

’s

Supp

ortin

g E

vide

nce

Def

enda

nts’

Pr

opos

ed

Con

stru

ctio

n

Def

enda

nts’

Su

ppor

ting

Evi

denc

e

1-a

rota

ry a

ir ch

ambe

r se

cure

d to

a

hub

cap

a st

ruct

ure

that

fo

rms a

n en

clos

ed

spac

e th

at is

ca

pabl

e of

rota

tion

firm

ly fi

xed

or

inte

grat

ed in

to a

hu

b ca

p

Intri

nsic

’4

65 C

ol. 2

:37;

2:

44-4

5; 2

:53;

2:

63-6

5; F

igs.

2-3

and

5.

File

His

tory

: TT

ech0

0030

5-30

6;

TTec

h000

219-

220;

TT

ech0

0020

9-21

1 Pr

ovis

iona

l App

. N

o. 6

0/65

2,54

4 at

pp

. 1, 3

. TT

ech0

0050

6, 5

08

a st

ruct

ure

that

fo

rms a

n en

clos

ed

spac

e, is

atta

ched

to

and

sepa

rate

fr

om a

hub

cap

, and

ro

tate

s with

the

whe

el

Intri

nsic

: ‘4

65 C

ol. 2

:52-

54,

2:63

-3:1

; 3:5

1-55

, 4:

34-3

6, 5

:4-7

, 5:

25, 5

:33-

34, 5

:38,

Fi

gs. 1

-6.

Extri

nsic

Se

cure

m

eans

“t

o m

ake

firm

or

tight

; fa

sten

” [T

he

Am

eric

an H

erita

ge

Dic

tiona

ry,

2nd

Col

lege

Ed

ition

, (1

985)

, p.

11

09]

(TTe

ch00

0484

)

Secu

re

mea

ns

“to

mak

e fa

st,

tie

dow

n”

[Web

ster

’s

3d (

2002

), p.

205

3]

Cas

e 1:

16-c

v-01

778-

AT

D

ocum

ent 1

08

File

d 01

/11/

17

Pag

e 5

of 3

7

IPR Page 5

Page 6: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ...€¦ · A. Agreed Claim Construction Claim term Joint Construction plurality two or more Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108

A-2

Cla

im

Nos

. D

ispu

ted

Cla

im T

erm

or

Phr

ase

Plai

ntiff

’s

Prop

osed

C

onst

ruct

ion

Plai

ntiff

’s

Supp

ortin

g E

vide

nce

Def

enda

nts’

Pr

opos

ed

Con

stru

ctio

n

Def

enda

nts’

Su

ppor

ting

Evi

denc

e

Extri

nsic

Se

cure

(ver

b)

mea

ns “

to m

ake

firm

or t

ight

; fa

sten

.”

The

Am

eric

an

Her

itage

D

ictio

nary

, 2nd

C

olle

ge E

ditio

n,

(198

5), p

. 110

9.

TTec

h000

484.

U

.S. P

at. N

o.

6,96

8,88

2 (“

Ingr

am”)

at t

he

Abs

tract

; 5:2

6-30

; FI

G. 3

. TT

ech0

0048

9, 4

92

and

496.

((H

EN00

0011

52-

1158

)

Fast

en

mea

ns

“to

caus

e to

ho

ld

to

som

ethi

ng e

lse”

“to

caus

e (p

arts

w

hich

are

sep

arat

e)

to

hold

to

geth

er”

[Web

ster

’s

3d

(200

2), p

. 826

-827

] (H

EN00

0011

52-

1158

U.S

. Pat

ent N

o.

6,96

8,88

2, C

ol.

2:41

-43,

5:1

1-32

(H

EN00

0040

2-41

5).

1-b

exte

ndin

g th

roug

h th

e hu

b ca

p

exte

ndin

g at

leas

t w

ithin

a p

ortio

n of

th

e hu

b ca

p

Intri

nsic

’4

65 C

ol. 4

:40-

42;

pass

ing

thro

ugh

a su

rfac

e of

the

hub

cap

Intri

nsic

: ‘4

65 C

ol. 3

:30-

32;

4:40

-42,

Fig

s. 3-

5.

Cas

e 1:

16-c

v-01

778-

AT

D

ocum

ent 1

08

File

d 01

/11/

17

Pag

e 6

of 3

7

IPR Page 6

Page 7: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ...€¦ · A. Agreed Claim Construction Claim term Joint Construction plurality two or more Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108

A-3

Cla

im

Nos

. D

ispu

ted

Cla

im T

erm

or

Phr

ase

Plai

ntiff

’s

Prop

osed

C

onst

ruct

ion

Plai

ntiff

’s

Supp

ortin

g E

vide

nce

Def

enda

nts’

Pr

opos

ed

Con

stru

ctio

n

Def

enda

nts’

Su

ppor

ting

Evi

denc

e

Fi

g. 5

. Ex

trins

ic

Thro

ugh

mea

ns “

In

one

side

and

out

th

e op

posi

te o

r an

othe

r sid

e of

” or

“[

A]m

ong

or

betw

een;

in th

e m

idst

of”

. Th

e A

mer

ican

H

erita

ge

Dic

tiona

ry, 2

nd

Col

lege

Edi

tion,

(1

985)

, pp.

126

6-67

. TT

ech0

0048

5

Extri

nsic

Th

roug

h m

eans

“In

on

e si

de a

nd o

ut

the

oppo

site

or

anot

her s

ide

of”

[The

Am

eric

an

Her

itage

D

ictio

nary

, 2nd

C

olle

ge E

ditio

n,

(198

5), p

. 126

6-67

] (T

Tech

0004

85)

1-c

chec

k va

lve

A v

alve

is a

dev

ice

that

con

trols

flui

d or

gas

dire

ctio

n,

pres

sure

, or f

low

ra

te.

A c

heck

val

ve

Intri

nsic

’4

65 P

aten

t C

ol. 4

:3-1

2;

4:52

–63;

a on

e-w

ay p

ress

ure

resp

onsi

ve v

alve

th

at o

pens

to p

erm

it flo

w in

resp

onse

to

a dr

op in

pre

ssur

e

Intri

nsic

‘4

65 P

aten

t Col

. 4:

2-5;

4:1

0-12

, 4:

17-2

1, 4

:52-

55,

Cas

e 1:

16-c

v-01

778-

AT

D

ocum

ent 1

08

File

d 01

/11/

17

Pag

e 7

of 3

7

IPR Page 7

Page 8: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ...€¦ · A. Agreed Claim Construction Claim term Joint Construction plurality two or more Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108

A-4

Cla

im

Nos

. D

ispu

ted

Cla

im T

erm

or

Phr

ase

Plai

ntiff

’s

Prop

osed

C

onst

ruct

ion

Plai

ntiff

’s

Supp

ortin

g E

vide

nce

Def

enda

nts’

Pr

opos

ed

Con

stru

ctio

n

Def

enda

nts’

Su

ppor

ting

Evi

denc

e

is a

val

ve th

at m

ay

be b

iase

d to

war

ds

one

posi

tion,

whi

ch

bias

may

be

over

com

e by

ex

tern

al fo

rce

such

as

pne

umat

ic o

r m

echa

nica

l for

ce,

and

perm

its

infla

tion.

File

His

tory

: TT

ech0

0020

9-21

1 Ex

trins

ic

Mr.

Lehm

ann

is

expe

cted

to te

stify

as

an

expe

rt ab

out

valv

es in

gen

eral

an

d ho

w th

is

cons

truct

ion

is

cons

iste

nt w

ith h

is

tech

nolo

gica

l un

ders

tand

ing

and

cons

ider

atio

n of

the

’465

Pat

ent.

Glo

sssa

ry o

f Ter

ms

for F

luid

Pow

er,

AN

SI S

tand

ard

B.9

3.2

(197

1).

TTec

h000

486-

488.

on o

ne si

de o

f the

va

lve

in

com

paris

on to

a

high

er p

ress

ure

than

on

the

othe

r si

de o

f the

val

ve

and

othe

rwis

e bl

ocks

reve

rse

flow

4:58

-62,

5:2

3-29

, Fi

g. 3

. Ex

trins

ic

chec

k va

lve

mea

ns

“A d

evic

e fo

r au

tom

atic

ally

lim

iting

flow

in a

pi

ping

syst

em to

a

sing

le d

irect

ion.

A

lso

know

n as

a

nonr

etur

n va

lve.

[McG

raw

-Hill

D

ictio

nary

of

Engi

neer

ing,

2nd

Ed

. (20

03),

p. 9

9]

(HEN

0000

793)

;

“val

ve, d

irect

iona

l co

ntro

l, ch

eck:

a

dire

ctio

nal c

ontro

l va

lve

whi

ch

perm

its fl

ow in

on

ly o

ne d

irect

ion”

Cas

e 1:

16-c

v-01

778-

AT

D

ocum

ent 1

08

File

d 01

/11/

17

Pag

e 8

of 3

7

IPR Page 8

Page 9: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ...€¦ · A. Agreed Claim Construction Claim term Joint Construction plurality two or more Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108

A-5

Cla

im

Nos

. D

ispu

ted

Cla

im T

erm

or

Phr

ase

Plai

ntiff

’s

Prop

osed

C

onst

ruct

ion

Plai

ntiff

’s

Supp

ortin

g E

vide

nce

Def

enda

nts’

Pr

opos

ed

Con

stru

ctio

n

Def

enda

nts’

Su

ppor

ting

Evi

denc

e

U.S

. Pat

. No.

6,

968,

882

(“In

gram

”) a

t the

A

bstra

ct; 3

:28-

41;

6:41

– 7

:19;

FIG

. 1.

TTec

h000

489-

490,

TT

ech0

0049

5-49

6.

[Glo

ssar

y of

Ter

ms

for F

luid

Pow

er,

AN

SI S

tand

ard

B.9

3.2

(197

1),

TTec

h000

488]

U.S

. Pat

ent N

o.

2,31

7,63

6, C

ol.

2a:4

-22,

3b:

3-6,

3b

:22-

24, F

ig. 3

(H

EN00

0009

2-96

). U

.S. P

aten

t No.

5,

505,

080,

Col

. 3:

15-1

7 (H

EN00

0025

9-27

2).

U.S

. Pat

ent N

o.

6,96

8,88

2, C

ol.

6:49

-51,

6:6

6-7:

16,

Fig.

4

(HEN

0000

402-

415)

.

Cas

e 1:

16-c

v-01

778-

AT

D

ocum

ent 1

08

File

d 01

/11/

17

Pag

e 9

of 3

7

IPR Page 9

Page 10: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ...€¦ · A. Agreed Claim Construction Claim term Joint Construction plurality two or more Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108

A-6

Cla

im

Nos

. D

ispu

ted

Cla

im T

erm

or

Phr

ase

Plai

ntiff

’s

Prop

osed

C

onst

ruct

ion

Plai

ntiff

’s

Supp

ortin

g E

vide

nce

Def

enda

nts’

Pr

opos

ed

Con

stru

ctio

n

Def

enda

nts’

Su

ppor

ting

Evi

denc

e

U.S

. Pat

ent N

o.

7,27

3,08

2, C

ol.

2:24

-35;

col

. 6:1

4-20

(HEN

0000

472-

508)

. U

.S. P

aten

t No.

9,

132,

704,

Col

. 3:

16-3

2 (H

EN00

0060

8-64

1).

Park

er C

heck

V

alve

Cat

alog

Ex

cerp

t.

(HEN

0001

149)

. H

AM

-LET

Che

ck

Val

ve C

atal

og

Exce

rpt.

(H

EN00

0115

0).

Cas

e 1:

16-c

v-01

778-

AT

D

ocum

ent 1

08

File

d 01

/11/

17

Pag

e 10

of 3

7

IPR Page 10

Page 11: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ...€¦ · A. Agreed Claim Construction Claim term Joint Construction plurality two or more Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108

A-7

Cla

im

Nos

. D

ispu

ted

Cla

im T

erm

or

Phr

ase

Plai

ntiff

’s

Prop

osed

C

onst

ruct

ion

Plai

ntiff

’s

Supp

ortin

g E

vide

nce

Def

enda

nts’

Pr

opos

ed

Con

stru

ctio

n

Def

enda

nts’

Su

ppor

ting

Evi

denc

e

Mer

itor T

ire

Infla

tion

Syst

em

(“M

TIS”

), M

aint

enan

ce

Man

ual 1

4P, a

t 1-3

(H

EN00

0108

4-10

86).

Dec

lara

tion

and/

or

Test

imon

y of

B.

Muc

kelra

th.

1-d

each

che

ck

valv

e …

[and

] …

a

corr

espo

ndin

g tir

e

No

cons

truct

ion

need

ed to

the

exte

nt th

at c

heck

va

lve

is p

rope

rly

cons

trued

as

indi

cate

d ab

ove.

(see

abo

ve

rega

rdin

g ch

eck

valv

e)

at le

ast o

ne c

heck

va

lve

for e

ach

tire

Intri

nsic

‘4

65 P

aten

t, C

ol.

4:2-

5; 4

:10-

12,

4:17

-21,

4:5

2-55

, 4:

58-6

2, 5

:23-

29;

Fig.

3, 6

. ‘4

65 H

isto

ry,

9/28

/200

9 A

men

d.

(TTe

ch00

0204

, 20

9-21

2)

Cas

e 1:

16-c

v-01

778-

AT

D

ocum

ent 1

08

File

d 01

/11/

17

Pag

e 11

of 3

7

IPR Page 11

Page 12: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ...€¦ · A. Agreed Claim Construction Claim term Joint Construction plurality two or more Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108

A-8

Cla

im

Nos

. D

ispu

ted

Cla

im T

erm

or

Phr

ase

Plai

ntiff

’s

Prop

osed

C

onst

ruct

ion

Plai

ntiff

’s

Supp

ortin

g E

vide

nce

Def

enda

nts’

Pr

opos

ed

Con

stru

ctio

n

Def

enda

nts’

Su

ppor

ting

Evi

denc

e

Extri

nsic

U

.S. P

aten

t No.

9,

132,

704,

Col

. 3:

16-3

2 (H

EN00

0060

8-64

1).

1-

e a

plur

ality

of

chec

k va

lves

, ea

ch c

heck

va

lve

conf

igur

ed to

in

ject

air

into

a co

rres

pond

ing

tire

whe

n tir

e ai

r pre

ssur

e dr

ops b

elow

a

first

adj

usta

ble

pres

et v

alue

Tran

s Tec

h di

sagr

ees t

hat t

his

clai

m p

hras

e is

co

nstru

ed a

s a

mea

ns p

lus

func

tion.

N

o co

nstru

ctio

n is

ne

eded

to th

e ex

tent

that

che

ck

valv

e is

pro

perly

co

nstru

ed a

s in

dica

ted

abov

e.

(see

abo

ve

rega

rdin

g ch

eck

valv

e)

Mea

ns p

lus

func

tion

cons

truc

tion.

Fu

nctio

n:

inje

ctin

g ai

r int

o a

corr

espo

ndin

g tir

e w

hen

tire

air

pres

sure

dro

ps

belo

w a

firs

t ad

just

able

pre

set

valu

e.

Stru

ctur

e:

• a

non-

rota

ting

air p

ress

ure

regu

lato

r in

fluid

Intri

nsic

‘4

65 P

aten

t, C

ol.

4:2-

5; 4

:10-

12,

4:17

-21,

4:5

2-55

,

Cas

e 1:

16-c

v-01

778-

AT

D

ocum

ent 1

08

File

d 01

/11/

17

Pag

e 12

of 3

7

IPR Page 12

Page 13: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ...€¦ · A. Agreed Claim Construction Claim term Joint Construction plurality two or more Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108

A-9

Cla

im

Nos

. D

ispu

ted

Cla

im T

erm

or

Phr

ase

Plai

ntiff

’s

Prop

osed

C

onst

ruct

ion

Plai

ntiff

’s

Supp

ortin

g E

vide

nce

Def

enda

nts’

Pr

opos

ed

Con

stru

ctio

n

Def

enda

nts’

Su

ppor

ting

Evi

denc

e

com

mun

icat

ion

with

the

rota

ry

air c

ham

ber t

hat

supp

lies a

ir ba

sed

on th

e fir

st a

djus

tabl

e pr

eset

pre

ssur

e va

lue;

mul

tiple

che

ck

valv

es, e

ach

chec

k va

lve

open

s to

perm

it ai

r to

flow

into

a

corr

espo

ndin

g tir

e in

resp

onse

to

a d

rop

in ti

re

pres

sure

that

is

belo

w th

e pr

essu

re se

t by

the

regu

lato

r an

d ot

herw

ise

bloc

ks fl

ow

from

the

tire;

an

d

4:58

-62,

5:2

3-29

, 6:

4-6;

Fig

. 3, 6

. ‘4

65 H

isto

ry,

9/28

/200

9 A

men

d.

(TTe

ch00

0204

, 20

9-21

2)

Prov

. App

. 60

/652

544

at 3

(“

Ref

errin

g to

Fig

. 2

… .”

par

agra

ph)

(HEN

0001

075)

‘3

79 P

aten

t Col

. 1:

49-5

3, 2

:37-

39,

2:50

-52,

3:3

7-40

, 3:

61-6

5, 4

:9-1

1,

4:60

-62;

Fig

. 4.

(HEN

0000

509-

518)

‘3

79 H

isto

ry,

5/14

/200

7 at

4-5

Cas

e 1:

16-c

v-01

778-

AT

D

ocum

ent 1

08

File

d 01

/11/

17

Pag

e 13

of 3

7

IPR Page 13

Page 14: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ...€¦ · A. Agreed Claim Construction Claim term Joint Construction plurality two or more Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108

A-1

0

Cla

im

Nos

. D

ispu

ted

Cla

im T

erm

or

Phr

ase

Plai

ntiff

’s

Prop

osed

C

onst

ruct

ion

Plai

ntiff

’s

Supp

ortin

g E

vide

nce

Def

enda

nts’

Pr

opos

ed

Con

stru

ctio

n

Def

enda

nts’

Su

ppor

ting

Evi

denc

e

• ea

ch c

heck

va

lve

is lo

cate

d in

the

rota

ry a

ir ch

ambe

r at a

n ex

it of

the

cham

ber

Pr

opos

ed

cons

truc

tion,

in

the

alte

rnat

ive.

m

ultip

le c

heck

va

lves

: •

each

che

ck

valv

e op

ens t

o pe

rmit

air t

o flo

w in

to a

co

rres

pond

ing

tire

in re

spon

se

to a

dro

p in

tire

pr

essu

re th

at is

be

low

the

pres

sure

set b

y th

e re

gula

tor

and

othe

rwis

e

(HEN

0000

918-

919)

‘3

79 H

isto

ry,

12/1

0/20

07 a

t 10-

12 (H

EN00

0090

1-90

3)

‘379

His

tory

, 9/

8/20

08 a

t 3-5

. (H

EN00

0086

3-86

5)

‘379

His

tory

, 12

/8/2

008

Res

pons

e, 6

-10

(HEN

0000

827-

831)

Ex

trins

ic

chec

k va

lve

mea

ns

“A d

evic

e fo

r au

tom

atic

ally

lim

iting

flow

in a

Cas

e 1:

16-c

v-01

778-

AT

D

ocum

ent 1

08

File

d 01

/11/

17

Pag

e 14

of 3

7

IPR Page 14

Page 15: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ...€¦ · A. Agreed Claim Construction Claim term Joint Construction plurality two or more Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108

A-1

1

Cla

im

Nos

. D

ispu

ted

Cla

im T

erm

or

Phr

ase

Plai

ntiff

’s

Prop

osed

C

onst

ruct

ion

Plai

ntiff

’s

Supp

ortin

g E

vide

nce

Def

enda

nts’

Pr

opos

ed

Con

stru

ctio

n

Def

enda

nts’

Su

ppor

ting

Evi

denc

e

bloc

ks fl

ow

from

the

tire;

an

d •

each

che

ck

valv

e is

loca

ted

with

in th

e ro

tary

ai

r cha

mbe

r

pipi

ng sy

stem

to a

si

ngle

dire

ctio

n.

Als

o kn

own

as a

no

nret

urn

valv

e.”

[M

cGra

w-H

ill

Dic

tiona

ry o

f En

gine

erin

g, 2

nd

Ed. (

2003

), p.

99]

(H

EN00

0079

3);

“val

ve, d

irect

iona

l co

ntro

l, ch

eck:

a

dire

ctio

nal c

ontro

l va

lve

whi

ch

perm

its fl

ow in

on

ly o

ne d

irect

ion”

[G

loss

ary

of T

erm

s fo

r Flu

id P

ower

, A

NSI

Sta

ndar

d B

.93.

2 (1

971)

, TT

ech0

0048

8]

U.S

. Pat

ent N

o.

2,31

7,63

6, C

ol.

Cas

e 1:

16-c

v-01

778-

AT

D

ocum

ent 1

08

File

d 01

/11/

17

Pag

e 15

of 3

7

IPR Page 15

Page 16: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ...€¦ · A. Agreed Claim Construction Claim term Joint Construction plurality two or more Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108

A-1

2

Cla

im

Nos

. D

ispu

ted

Cla

im T

erm

or

Phr

ase

Plai

ntiff

’s

Prop

osed

C

onst

ruct

ion

Plai

ntiff

’s

Supp

ortin

g E

vide

nce

Def

enda

nts’

Pr

opos

ed

Con

stru

ctio

n

Def

enda

nts’

Su

ppor

ting

Evi

denc

e

2a:4

-22,

Col

. 3b:

3-6,

3b:

22-2

4, F

ig. 3

. (H

EN00

0009

2-96

) U

.S. P

aten

t No.

5,

505,

080,

Col

. 3:

15-1

7 (H

EN00

0025

9-27

2)

U.S

. Pat

ent N

o.

6,96

8,88

2, C

ol.

6:49

-51,

6:6

6-7:

16,

Fig.

4.

(HEN

0000

402-

415)

U

.S. P

aten

t No.

7,

273,

082,

Col

. 2:

24-3

5; c

ol. 6

:14-

20.

(HEN

0004

72-

508)

Cas

e 1:

16-c

v-01

778-

AT

D

ocum

ent 1

08

File

d 01

/11/

17

Pag

e 16

of 3

7

IPR Page 16

Page 17: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ...€¦ · A. Agreed Claim Construction Claim term Joint Construction plurality two or more Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108

A-1

3

Cla

im

Nos

. D

ispu

ted

Cla

im T

erm

or

Phr

ase

Plai

ntiff

’s

Prop

osed

C

onst

ruct

ion

Plai

ntiff

’s

Supp

ortin

g E

vide

nce

Def

enda

nts’

Pr

opos

ed

Con

stru

ctio

n

Def

enda

nts’

Su

ppor

ting

Evi

denc

e

U.S

. Pat

ent N

o.

9,13

2,70

4, C

ol.

3:16

-32.

(H

EN00

0060

8-64

1)

Dec

lara

tion

and/

or

Test

imon

y of

B.

Muc

kelra

th.

1-

f re

lief v

alve

A

val

ve is

a d

evic

e th

at c

ontro

ls fl

uid

or g

as d

irect

ion,

pr

essu

re, o

r flo

w

rate

. A

relie

f val

ve

is a

val

ve th

at is

bi

ased

tow

ards

one

po

sitio

n, w

hich

bi

as m

ay b

e ov

erco

me

by

exte

rnal

forc

e su

ch

Intri

nsic

’4

65 C

ol. 2

:2-4

; 3:

11-1

4; 3

:65-

67;

4:48

-50.

Fi

le H

isto

ry:

TTec

h 00

0209

0002

11.

Extri

nsic

a pr

essu

re

resp

onsi

ve v

alve

th

at o

pens

to

relie

ve p

ress

ure

beyo

nd a

spec

ified

lim

it an

d re

clos

es

upon

retu

rn to

no

rmal

ope

ratin

g co

nditi

ons

Intri

nsic

‘4

65 P

aten

t, C

ol.

3:11

-17,

3:6

5-4:

2,

4:48

-52,

5:2

9-32

; Fi

gs. 2

-6.

Extri

nsic

pr

essu

re-r

elie

f va

lve

mea

ns “

A

valv

e w

hich

re

lieve

s pre

ssur

e

Cas

e 1:

16-c

v-01

778-

AT

D

ocum

ent 1

08

File

d 01

/11/

17

Pag

e 17

of 3

7

IPR Page 17

Page 18: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ...€¦ · A. Agreed Claim Construction Claim term Joint Construction plurality two or more Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108

A-1

4

Cla

im

Nos

. D

ispu

ted

Cla

im T

erm

or

Phr

ase

Plai

ntiff

’s

Prop

osed

C

onst

ruct

ion

Plai

ntiff

’s

Supp

ortin

g E

vide

nce

Def

enda

nts’

Pr

opos

ed

Con

stru

ctio

n

Def

enda

nts’

Su

ppor

ting

Evi

denc

e

as a

pne

umat

ic o

r m

echa

nica

l for

ce,

and

perm

its th

e re

leas

e of

exc

ess

air p

ress

ure.

Mr.

Lehm

ann

is

expe

cted

to te

stify

as

an

expe

rt ab

out

valv

es in

gen

eral

an

d ho

w th

is

cons

truct

ion

is

cons

iste

nt w

ith h

is

tech

nolo

gica

l un

ders

tand

ing

and

cons

ider

atio

n of

the

’465

Pat

ent.

Glo

ssar

y of

Ter

ms

for F

luid

Pow

er,

AN

SI S

tand

ard

B.9

3.2

(197

1).

TTec

h000

486-

488.

beyo

nd a

spec

ified

lim

it an

d re

clos

es

upon

retu

rn to

no

rmal

ope

ratin

g co

nditi

ons”

[M

cGra

w-H

ill

Dic

tiona

ry o

f En

gine

erin

g, 2

nd

Ed. (

2003

), p.

423

, se

e al

so p

. 422

“r

elie

f val

ve S

ee

pres

sure

-rel

ief

valv

e”]

(HEN

0000

794-

795)

“v

alve

, pre

ssur

e co

ntro

l, re

lief:

a pr

essu

re c

ontro

l va

lve

who

se

prim

ary

func

tion

is

to li

mit

syst

em

pres

sure

” [G

loss

ary

of T

erm

s for

Flu

id

Cas

e 1:

16-c

v-01

778-

AT

D

ocum

ent 1

08

File

d 01

/11/

17

Pag

e 18

of 3

7

IPR Page 18

Page 19: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ...€¦ · A. Agreed Claim Construction Claim term Joint Construction plurality two or more Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108

A-1

5

Cla

im

Nos

. D

ispu

ted

Cla

im T

erm

or

Phr

ase

Plai

ntiff

’s

Prop

osed

C

onst

ruct

ion

Plai

ntiff

’s

Supp

ortin

g E

vide

nce

Def

enda

nts’

Pr

opos

ed

Con

stru

ctio

n

Def

enda

nts’

Su

ppor

ting

Evi

denc

e

Pow

er, A

NSI

St

anda

rd B

.93.

2 (1

971)

, TT

ech0

0048

8]

U.S

. Pat

ent N

o.

2,31

7,63

6, C

ol.

2a:5

2-56

, Col

. 2b

:23-

35, 3

b:6-

8,

3b:2

4-26

, Fig

s. 1,

3,

4 (H

EN00

0009

2-96

). U

.S. P

aten

t No.

5,

505,

080

to

McG

hee,

Col

. 8:

43-4

8 (H

EN00

0025

9-27

2)

Dec

lara

tion

and/

or

Test

imon

y of

B.

Muc

kelra

th.

Cas

e 1:

16-c

v-01

778-

AT

D

ocum

ent 1

08

File

d 01

/11/

17

Pag

e 19

of 3

7

IPR Page 19

Page 20: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ...€¦ · A. Agreed Claim Construction Claim term Joint Construction plurality two or more Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108

A-1

6

Cla

im

Nos

. D

ispu

ted

Cla

im T

erm

or

Phr

ase

Plai

ntiff

’s

Prop

osed

C

onst

ruct

ion

Plai

ntiff

’s

Supp

ortin

g E

vide

nce

Def

enda

nts’

Pr

opos

ed

Con

stru

ctio

n

Def

enda

nts’

Su

ppor

ting

Evi

denc

e

1-g

each

relie

f va

lve

… [a

nd]

… a

co

rres

pond

ing

tire

No

cons

truct

ion

need

ed to

the

exte

nt th

at re

lief

valv

e is

pro

perly

co

nstru

ed a

s in

dica

ted

abov

e.

(see

abo

ve

rega

rdin

g re

lief

valv

e)

at le

ast o

ne re

lief

valv

e fo

r eac

h tir

e In

trins

ic

‘465

Pat

ent,

Col

. 3:

11-1

7, 3

:65-

4:2,

4:

48-5

2, F

igs.

2-6.

‘4

65 H

isto

ry,

9/28

/200

9 A

men

d.

(TTe

ch00

0204

, 20

9-21

2)

Dec

lara

tion

and/

or

Test

imon

y of

B.

Muc

kelra

th.

1-h

and

a pl

ural

ity

of re

lief

valv

es, e

ach

relie

f val

ve

conf

igur

ed to

re

leas

e ai

r fr

om a

co

rres

pond

ing

tire

whe

n tir

e pr

essu

re ri

ses

abov

e a

Tran

s Tec

h di

sagr

ees t

hat t

his

clai

m p

hras

e is

co

nstru

ed a

s a

mea

ns p

lus

func

tion.

N

o co

nstru

ctio

n is

ne

eded

to th

e ex

tent

that

relie

f va

lve

is p

rope

rly

(see

abo

ve

rega

rdin

g re

lief

valv

e)

mul

tiple

relie

f va

lves

, •

each

relie

f val

ve

open

s to

relie

ve

pres

sure

in a

co

rres

pond

ing

tire

in re

spon

se

to p

ress

ure

risin

g ab

ove

a se

cond

ad

just

able

pre

set

Intri

nsic

‘4

65 P

aten

t, C

ol.

3:11

-17,

3:6

5-4:

2,

4:48

-2, 5

:23-

26,

5:29

-32;

Fig

s. 2-

6.

‘465

His

tory

, 9/

28/2

009

Am

end.

(T

Tech

0002

04,

209-

212)

Cas

e 1:

16-c

v-01

778-

AT

D

ocum

ent 1

08

File

d 01

/11/

17

Pag

e 20

of 3

7

IPR Page 20

Page 21: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ...€¦ · A. Agreed Claim Construction Claim term Joint Construction plurality two or more Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108

A-1

7

Cla

im

Nos

. D

ispu

ted

Cla

im T

erm

or

Phr

ase

Plai

ntiff

’s

Prop

osed

C

onst

ruct

ion

Plai

ntiff

’s

Supp

ortin

g E

vide

nce

Def

enda

nts’

Pr

opos

ed

Con

stru

ctio

n

Def

enda

nts’

Su

ppor

ting

Evi

denc

e

seco

nd

adju

stab

le

pres

et v

alue

cons

trued

as

indi

cate

d ab

ove.

va

lue

and

recl

oses

upo

n re

turn

to n

orm

al

oper

atin

g co

nditi

ons;

each

relie

f val

ve

is lo

cate

d w

ithin

th

e ro

tary

air

cham

ber

inde

finite

bec

ause

C

laim

1 re

fers

to

chec

k va

lves

and

re

lief v

alve

s as

inje

ctin

g an

d re

leas

ing

air f

rom

a

tire

but d

oes n

ot

iden

tify

the

coop

erat

ive

rela

tions

hip

of th

e va

lves

; the

sp

ecifi

catio

n do

es

not d

iscl

ose

an

oper

able

‘379

Pat

ent C

ol.

1:49

-51,

2:3

7-39

, 3:

37-4

0, 3

:54-

58;

Fig.

4.

(HEN

0000

509-

518)

‘3

79 H

isto

ry,

5/14

/200

7 at

4-5

(H

EN00

0091

8-91

9)

‘379

His

tory

, 12

/10/

2007

at 1

0-12

(HEN

0000

901-

903)

‘3

79 H

isto

ry,

9/8/

2008

at 3

-5.

(HEN

0000

863-

865)

‘3

79 H

isto

ry,

12/8

/200

8

Cas

e 1:

16-c

v-01

778-

AT

D

ocum

ent 1

08

File

d 01

/11/

17

Pag

e 21

of 3

7

IPR Page 21

Page 22: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ...€¦ · A. Agreed Claim Construction Claim term Joint Construction plurality two or more Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108

A-1

8

Cla

im

Nos

. D

ispu

ted

Cla

im T

erm

or

Phr

ase

Plai

ntiff

’s

Prop

osed

C

onst

ruct

ion

Plai

ntiff

’s

Supp

ortin

g E

vide

nce

Def

enda

nts’

Pr

opos

ed

Con

stru

ctio

n

Def

enda

nts’

Su

ppor

ting

Evi

denc

e

conf

igur

atio

n of

the

valv

es.

Res

pons

e, 6

-10

(HEN

0000

827-

831)

Ex

trins

ic

pres

sure

-rel

ief

valv

e m

eans

“A

va

lve

whi

ch

relie

ves p

ress

ure

beyo

nd a

spec

ified

lim

it an

d re

clos

es

upon

retu

rn to

no

rmal

ope

ratin

g co

nditi

ons”

[M

cGra

w-H

ill

Dic

tiona

ry o

f En

gine

erin

g, 2

nd

Ed. (

2003

), p.

423

, se

e al

so p

. 422

“r

elie

f val

ve S

ee

pres

sure

-rel

ief

valv

e”]

(HEN

0000

794-

795)

Cas

e 1:

16-c

v-01

778-

AT

D

ocum

ent 1

08

File

d 01

/11/

17

Pag

e 22

of 3

7

IPR Page 22

Page 23: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ...€¦ · A. Agreed Claim Construction Claim term Joint Construction plurality two or more Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108

A-1

9

Cla

im

Nos

. D

ispu

ted

Cla

im T

erm

or

Phr

ase

Plai

ntiff

’s

Prop

osed

C

onst

ruct

ion

Plai

ntiff

’s

Supp

ortin

g E

vide

nce

Def

enda

nts’

Pr

opos

ed

Con

stru

ctio

n

Def

enda

nts’

Su

ppor

ting

Evi

denc

e

“val

ve, p

ress

ure

cont

rol,

relie

f: a

pres

sure

con

trol

valv

e w

hose

pr

imar

y fu

nctio

n is

to

lim

it sy

stem

pr

essu

re”

[Glo

ssar

y of

Ter

ms f

or F

luid

Po

wer

, AN

SI

Stan

dard

B.9

3.2

(197

1),

TTec

h000

488]

U

.S. P

aten

t No.

2,

317,

636,

Col

. 2a

:52-

56, C

ol.

2b:2

3-35

, 3b:

6-8,

3b

:24-

26, F

igs.

1,

3, 4

. (H

EN00

0009

2-96

) U

.S. P

aten

t No.

5,

505,

080

to

Cas

e 1:

16-c

v-01

778-

AT

D

ocum

ent 1

08

File

d 01

/11/

17

Pag

e 23

of 3

7

IPR Page 23

Page 24: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ...€¦ · A. Agreed Claim Construction Claim term Joint Construction plurality two or more Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108

A-2

0

Cla

im

Nos

. D

ispu

ted

Cla

im T

erm

or

Phr

ase

Plai

ntiff

’s

Prop

osed

C

onst

ruct

ion

Plai

ntiff

’s

Supp

ortin

g E

vide

nce

Def

enda

nts’

Pr

opos

ed

Con

stru

ctio

n

Def

enda

nts’

Su

ppor

ting

Evi

denc

e

McG

hee,

Col

. 8:

43-4

8.

(HEN

0000

259-

272)

D

ecla

ratio

n an

d/or

Te

stim

ony

of B

. M

ucke

lrath

. 12

-a

13

mea

ns fo

r ca

usin

g ai

r to

flow

thro

ugh

an a

ir lin

e w

ithin

an

axle

w

here

in th

e ca

usin

g m

eans

re

mai

ns

stat

iona

ry

The

parti

es a

gree

th

at th

is te

rm is

go

vern

ed b

y §1

12(6

). Th

e co

rres

pond

ing

stru

ctur

e(s)

, act

(s)

or m

ater

ial(s

) is:

a

pres

suriz

ed a

ir ta

nk a

nd a

ir pr

essu

re re

gula

tor

in fl

uid

com

mun

icat

ion

with

an

air l

ine

with

in a

n ax

le.

Intri

nsic

evi

denc

e ’4

65, C

ol. 3

:18-

30;

4:24

-31;

Fig

. 4.

Mea

ns p

lus

func

tion

cons

truc

tion.

Fu

nctio

n:

Cau

sing

air

to fl

ow

thro

ugh

an a

ir lin

e w

ithin

an

axle

St

ruct

ure:

a

non-

rota

ting

pres

suriz

ed a

ir ta

nk

and

air h

oses

co

nnec

ting

to

inte

rmed

iate

co

mpo

nent

s tha

t

Intri

nsic

Evi

denc

e ‘4

65 P

aten

t Col

. 3:

18-2

3, 3

:29-

30,

5:4-

7; F

igs.

2-6

Extri

nsic

Evi

denc

e

Cas

e 1:

16-c

v-01

778-

AT

D

ocum

ent 1

08

File

d 01

/11/

17

Pag

e 24

of 3

7

IPR Page 24

Page 25: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ...€¦ · A. Agreed Claim Construction Claim term Joint Construction plurality two or more Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108

A-2

1

Cla

im

Nos

. D

ispu

ted

Cla

im T

erm

or

Phr

ase

Plai

ntiff

’s

Prop

osed

C

onst

ruct

ion

Plai

ntiff

’s

Supp

ortin

g E

vide

nce

Def

enda

nts’

Pr

opos

ed

Con

stru

ctio

n

Def

enda

nts’

Su

ppor

ting

Evi

denc

e

Tran

s Tec

h co

nten

ds th

at th

e C

laim

13

term

“w

here

in th

e ca

usin

g m

eans

re

mai

ns st

atio

nary

” is

not

gov

erne

d by

§

112(

6), a

nd th

at

no c

onst

ruct

ion

is

need

ed.

lead

to a

n ai

r lin

e w

ithin

an

axle

C

laim

scop

e of

cl

aim

13

is

iden

tical

to c

laim

12

bec

ause

ther

e is

no

dis

tinct

di

sclo

sure

of r

otar

y ca

usin

g m

eans

.

Dec

lara

tion

and/

or

Test

imon

y of

B.

Muc

kelra

th.

12-b

m

eans

for

inje

ctin

g th

e ai

r int

o th

e tir

e w

hen

tire

pres

sure

dro

ps

belo

w a

firs

t pr

eset

val

ue

The

parti

es a

gree

th

at th

is te

rm is

go

vern

ed b

y §1

12(6

), th

ough

Tr

ans T

ech

belie

ves t

hat o

nly

the

“mea

ns fo

r in

ject

ing

the

air

into

the

tire”

po

rtion

of t

he te

rm

is su

bjec

t to

Intri

nsic

evi

denc

e ’4

65 P

aten

t 4:2

-5;

4:52

-55;

Fig

s. 3

and

6; se

e al

so 5

:27

(use

of t

erm

“i

njec

t” in

Cla

im 1

of

’465

Pat

ent).

Mea

ns p

lus

func

tion

cons

truc

tion.

Fu

nctio

n:

Inje

ctin

g ai

r int

o a

tire

whe

n tir

e ai

r pr

essu

re d

rops

be

low

a fi

rst p

rese

t va

lue.

St

ruct

ure:

a no

n-ro

tatin

g

See

1-e

Cas

e 1:

16-c

v-01

778-

AT

D

ocum

ent 1

08

File

d 01

/11/

17

Pag

e 25

of 3

7

IPR Page 25

Page 26: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ...€¦ · A. Agreed Claim Construction Claim term Joint Construction plurality two or more Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108

A-2

2

Cla

im

Nos

. D

ispu

ted

Cla

im T

erm

or

Phr

ase

Plai

ntiff

’s

Prop

osed

C

onst

ruct

ion

Plai

ntiff

’s

Supp

ortin

g E

vide

nce

Def

enda

nts’

Pr

opos

ed

Con

stru

ctio

n

Def

enda

nts’

Su

ppor

ting

Evi

denc

e

§112

(6).

The

corr

espo

ndin

g st

ruct

ure(

s), a

ct(s

) or

mat

eria

l(s) i

s:

a ch

eck

valv

e in

flu

id

com

mun

icat

ion

with

the

caus

ing

mea

ns (a

s pro

perly

co

nstru

ed a

s in

dica

ted

abov

e).

air p

ress

ure

regu

lato

r in

fluid

co

mm

unic

atio

n w

ith th

e ro

tary

ai

r cha

mbe

r tha

t su

pplie

s air

base

d on

the

first

adj

usta

ble

pres

et p

ress

ure

valu

e;

• a

rota

ry a

ir ch

ambe

r at

tach

ed to

a

hub

cap;

a ch

eck

valv

e th

at o

pens

to

perm

it ai

r to

flow

into

a

corr

espo

ndin

g tir

e in

resp

onse

to

a d

rop

in ti

re

pres

sure

that

is

belo

w th

e

Cas

e 1:

16-c

v-01

778-

AT

D

ocum

ent 1

08

File

d 01

/11/

17

Pag

e 26

of 3

7

IPR Page 26

Page 27: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ...€¦ · A. Agreed Claim Construction Claim term Joint Construction plurality two or more Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108

A-2

3

Cla

im

Nos

. D

ispu

ted

Cla

im T

erm

or

Phr

ase

Plai

ntiff

’s

Prop

osed

C

onst

ruct

ion

Plai

ntiff

’s

Supp

ortin

g E

vide

nce

Def

enda

nts’

Pr

opos

ed

Con

stru

ctio

n

Def

enda

nts’

Su

ppor

ting

Evi

denc

e

pres

sure

set b

y th

e re

gula

tor,

and

othe

rwis

e bl

ocks

flow

fr

om th

e tir

e;

• an

d th

e ch

eck

valv

e is

loca

ted

in th

e ro

tary

air

cham

ber a

t an

exit

of th

e ro

tary

ai

r cha

mbe

r 12

-c

mea

ns fo

r re

leas

ing

air

from

the

tire

whe

n tir

e pr

essu

re ri

ses

abov

e a

seco

nd p

rese

t va

lue

The

parti

es a

gree

th

at th

is te

rm is

go

vern

ed b

y §1

12(6

), th

ough

Tr

ans T

ech

cont

ends

that

onl

y th

e “m

eans

for

rele

asin

g ai

r fro

m

the

tire”

por

tion

of

the

term

is su

bjec

t to

§11

2(6)

. The

co

rres

pond

ing

Intri

nsic

Evi

denc

e ’4

65, C

ol. 3

:65-

67;

4:48

-52;

Fig

s. 5,

6.

Mea

ns p

lus

func

tion

cons

truc

tion.

Fu

nctio

n:

Rel

easi

ng a

ir fr

om

the

tire

whe

n tir

e pr

essu

re ri

ses

abov

e a

seco

nd

pres

et v

alue

St

ruct

ure:

a ro

tary

air

cham

ber

atta

ched

to a

See

1-h

Cas

e 1:

16-c

v-01

778-

AT

D

ocum

ent 1

08

File

d 01

/11/

17

Pag

e 27

of 3

7

IPR Page 27

Page 28: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ...€¦ · A. Agreed Claim Construction Claim term Joint Construction plurality two or more Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108

A-2

4

Cla

im

Nos

. D

ispu

ted

Cla

im T

erm

or

Phr

ase

Plai

ntiff

’s

Prop

osed

C

onst

ruct

ion

Plai

ntiff

’s

Supp

ortin

g E

vide

nce

Def

enda

nts’

Pr

opos

ed

Con

stru

ctio

n

Def

enda

nts’

Su

ppor

ting

Evi

denc

e

stru

ctur

e(s)

, act

(s)

or m

ater

ial(s

) is:

a

relie

f val

ve.

hub

cap;

a re

lief v

alve

th

at re

lieve

s pr

essu

re ti

re in

re

spon

se to

tire

pr

essu

re ri

sing

ab

ove

a se

cond

ad

just

able

pre

set

valu

e an

d re

clos

es u

pon

retu

rn to

nor

mal

op

erat

ing

cond

ition

s; a

nd

• th

e re

lief v

alve

is

loca

ted

with

in

the

rota

ry a

ir ch

ambe

r, in

terio

r to

the

chec

k va

lve.

in

defin

ite b

ecau

se

the

spec

ifica

tion

fails

to id

entif

y st

ruct

ure

that

Cas

e 1:

16-c

v-01

778-

AT

D

ocum

ent 1

08

File

d 01

/11/

17

Pag

e 28

of 3

7

IPR Page 28

Page 29: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ...€¦ · A. Agreed Claim Construction Claim term Joint Construction plurality two or more Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108

A-2

5

Cla

im

Nos

. D

ispu

ted

Cla

im T

erm

or

Phr

ase

Plai

ntiff

’s

Prop

osed

C

onst

ruct

ion

Plai

ntiff

’s

Supp

ortin

g E

vide

nce

Def

enda

nts’

Pr

opos

ed

Con

stru

ctio

n

Def

enda

nts’

Su

ppor

ting

Evi

denc

e

corr

espo

nds t

o th

e lim

itatio

n un

der 3

5 U

.S.C

. § 1

12(6

) in

that

the

spec

ifica

tion

fails

to

dis

clos

e a

stru

ctur

e th

at

perf

orm

s the

re

cite

d fu

nctio

n

14-a

w

here

in th

e in

ject

ing

mea

ns is

fu

rther

co

nfig

ured

for

inje

ctin

g ai

r in

to a

seco

nd

tire

whe

n th

e se

cond

tire

pr

essu

re d

rops

be

low

the

first

pr

eset

val

ue

The

parti

es a

gree

th

at th

is te

rm is

go

vern

ed b

y §1

12(6

), th

ough

Tr

ans T

ech

cont

ends

that

onl

y th

e “i

njec

ting

mea

ns is

furth

er

conf

igur

ed fo

r in

ject

ing

air i

nto

a se

cond

tire

” po

rtion

of

the

term

is

subj

ect t

o §1

12(6

). Th

e co

rres

pond

ing

Intri

nsic

(s

ee a

bove

re

gard

ing

chec

k va

lve)

Se

e al

so:

’465

Col

. 4:2

-5;

Fig.

5.

whe

rein

the

inje

ctin

g m

eans

in

clud

es

• a

seco

nd c

heck

va

lve

that

ope

ns

to p

erm

it ai

r to

flow

into

a

corr

espo

ndin

g tir

e in

resp

onse

to

a d

rop

in ti

re

pres

sure

that

is

belo

w th

e pr

essu

re se

t by

the

regu

lato

r

See

1-e.

Cas

e 1:

16-c

v-01

778-

AT

D

ocum

ent 1

08

File

d 01

/11/

17

Pag

e 29

of 3

7

IPR Page 29

Page 30: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ...€¦ · A. Agreed Claim Construction Claim term Joint Construction plurality two or more Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108

A-2

6

Cla

im

Nos

. D

ispu

ted

Cla

im T

erm

or

Phr

ase

Plai

ntiff

’s

Prop

osed

C

onst

ruct

ion

Plai

ntiff

’s

Supp

ortin

g E

vide

nce

Def

enda

nts’

Pr

opos

ed

Con

stru

ctio

n

Def

enda

nts’

Su

ppor

ting

Evi

denc

e

stru

ctur

e(s)

, act

(s)

or m

ater

ial(s

) is:

w

here

in th

e in

ject

ing

mea

ns, (

as

prop

erly

con

stru

ed

as in

dica

ted

abov

e),

incl

udes

a se

cond

ch

eck

valv

e in

flui

d co

mm

unic

atio

n w

ith th

e ca

usin

g m

eans

(as p

rope

rly

cons

trued

as

indi

cate

d ab

ove)

.

and

othe

rwis

e bl

ocks

flow

fr

om th

e tir

e;

and

• th

e ch

eck

valv

e is

loca

ted

at a

se

cond

exi

t of

the

rota

ry a

ir ch

ambe

r.

14-b

re

leas

ing

mea

ns is

fu

rther

co

nfig

ured

for

rele

asin

g ai

r fr

om th

e se

cond

tire

w

hen

the

seco

nd ti

re

pres

sure

rise

s

The

parti

es a

gree

th

at th

at th

is te

rm is

go

vern

ed b

y §1

12(6

), th

ough

Tr

ans T

ech

cont

ends

that

onl

y th

e “r

elea

sing

m

eans

is fu

rther

co

nfig

ured

for

rele

asin

g ai

r fro

m

Intri

nsic

(s

ee a

bove

re

gard

ing

relie

f va

lve)

Se

e al

so:

’465

Col

. 3:

11-1

4; F

ig. 5

.

whe

rein

the

rele

asin

g m

eans

in

clud

es:

• a

seco

nd re

lief

valv

e th

at th

at

relie

ves p

ress

ure

in re

spon

se to

tir

e pr

essu

re

risin

g ab

ove

a se

cond

See

1-h.

Cas

e 1:

16-c

v-01

778-

AT

D

ocum

ent 1

08

File

d 01

/11/

17

Pag

e 30

of 3

7

IPR Page 30

Page 31: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ...€¦ · A. Agreed Claim Construction Claim term Joint Construction plurality two or more Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108

A-2

7

Cla

im

Nos

. D

ispu

ted

Cla

im T

erm

or

Phr

ase

Plai

ntiff

’s

Prop

osed

C

onst

ruct

ion

Plai

ntiff

’s

Supp

ortin

g E

vide

nce

Def

enda

nts’

Pr

opos

ed

Con

stru

ctio

n

Def

enda

nts’

Su

ppor

ting

Evi

denc

e

abov

e th

e se

cond

ad

just

able

pr

eset

val

ue

the

seco

nd ti

re”

porti

on o

f the

term

is

subj

ect t

o §1

12(6

). Th

e co

rres

pond

ing

stru

ctur

e(s)

, act

(s)

or m

ater

ial(s

) is:

w

here

in th

e re

leas

ing

mea

ns,

(as p

rope

rly

cons

trued

as

indi

cate

d ab

ove)

in

clud

es a

seco

nd

relie

f val

ve.

adju

stab

le p

rese

t va

lue

and

recl

oses

upo

n re

turn

to n

orm

al

oper

atin

g co

nditi

ons;

and

the

seco

nd re

lief

valv

e is

loca

ted

with

in th

e ro

tary

ai

r cha

mbe

r and

in

terio

r to

a se

cond

che

ck

valv

e in

defin

ite b

ecau

se

the

spec

ifica

tion

fails

to id

entif

y st

ruct

ure

that

co

rres

pond

s to

the

limita

tion

unde

r 35

U.S

.C. §

112

(6) i

n th

at th

e sp

ecifi

catio

n fa

ils

Cas

e 1:

16-c

v-01

778-

AT

D

ocum

ent 1

08

File

d 01

/11/

17

Pag

e 31

of 3

7

IPR Page 31

Page 32: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ...€¦ · A. Agreed Claim Construction Claim term Joint Construction plurality two or more Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108

A-2

8

Cla

im

Nos

. D

ispu

ted

Cla

im T

erm

or

Phr

ase

Plai

ntiff

’s

Prop

osed

C

onst

ruct

ion

Plai

ntiff

’s

Supp

ortin

g E

vide

nce

Def

enda

nts’

Pr

opos

ed

Con

stru

ctio

n

Def

enda

nts’

Su

ppor

ting

Evi

denc

e

to d

iscl

ose

a st

ruct

ure

that

pe

rfor

ms t

he

reci

ted

func

tion

15

w

here

in th

e in

ject

ing

mea

ns ro

tate

s w

ith th

e tir

e

Tran

s Tec

h co

nten

ds th

at th

is

term

is n

ot

gove

rned

by

§ 11

2(6)

. N

o co

nstru

ctio

n ne

eded

whe

n in

ject

ing

mea

ns is

pr

oper

ly c

onst

rued

.

(see

abo

ve

rega

rdin

g in

ject

ing

mea

ns)

inde

finite

bec

ause

sp

ecifi

catio

n fa

ils

to id

entif

y st

ruct

ure

that

cor

resp

onds

to

the

limita

tion

unde

r 35

U.S

.C. §

112

(6)

in th

at th

e sp

ecifi

catio

n fa

ils

to d

iscl

ose

a pr

essu

re re

gula

tor

that

rota

tes w

ith th

e tir

e In

the

alte

rnat

ive:

w

here

in th

e in

ject

ing

mea

ns (a

s pr

oper

ly c

onst

rued

ab

ove)

rota

tes w

ith

the

tire

See

12-b

. In

trins

ic E

vide

nce

‘465

Pat

ent,

Col

. 4:

2-5;

Fig

s. 1-

5.

Cas

e 1:

16-c

v-01

778-

AT

D

ocum

ent 1

08

File

d 01

/11/

17

Pag

e 32

of 3

7

IPR Page 32

Page 33: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ...€¦ · A. Agreed Claim Construction Claim term Joint Construction plurality two or more Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108

A-2

9

Cla

im

Nos

. D

ispu

ted

Cla

im T

erm

or

Phr

ase

Plai

ntiff

’s

Prop

osed

C

onst

ruct

ion

Plai

ntiff

’s

Supp

ortin

g E

vide

nce

Def

enda

nts’

Pr

opos

ed

Con

stru

ctio

n

Def

enda

nts’

Su

ppor

ting

Evi

denc

e

Cla

im sc

ope

of

clai

m 1

5 is

id

entic

al to

cla

im

12 b

ecau

se th

ere

is

no d

istin

ct

disc

losu

re o

f in

ject

ing

mea

ns

that

doe

s not

rota

te

with

tire

.

16

whe

rein

the

inje

ctin

g m

eans

is a

ro

tary

air

cham

ber

Tran

s Tec

h co

nten

ds th

at th

is

term

is n

ot

gove

rned

by

§112

(6).

No

cons

truct

ion

need

ed w

hen

inje

ctin

g m

eans

are

pr

oper

ly c

onst

rued

.

(see

abo

ve

rega

rdin

g in

ject

ing

mea

ns a

nd ro

tary

ai

r cha

mbe

r)

inde

finite

bec

ause

sp

ecifi

catio

n fa

ils

to id

entif

y st

ruct

ure

that

cor

resp

onds

to

the

limita

tion

unde

r 35

U.S

.C. §

112

(6)

in th

at th

e sp

ecifi

catio

n fa

ils

to d

iscl

ose

a pr

essu

re re

gula

tor

that

rota

tes w

ith th

e tir

e

See

12-b

.

Cas

e 1:

16-c

v-01

778-

AT

D

ocum

ent 1

08

File

d 01

/11/

17

Pag

e 33

of 3

7

IPR Page 33

Page 34: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ...€¦ · A. Agreed Claim Construction Claim term Joint Construction plurality two or more Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108

A-3

0

Cla

im

Nos

. D

ispu

ted

Cla

im T

erm

or

Phr

ase

Plai

ntiff

’s

Prop

osed

C

onst

ruct

ion

Plai

ntiff

’s

Supp

ortin

g E

vide

nce

Def

enda

nts’

Pr

opos

ed

Con

stru

ctio

n

Def

enda

nts’

Su

ppor

ting

Evi

denc

e

In th

e al

tern

ativ

e:

whe

rein

the

rota

ry

air c

ham

ber

incl

udes

the

inje

ctin

g m

eans

(as

prop

erly

con

stru

ed

abov

e)

Cla

im sc

ope

of

clai

m 1

6 is

id

entic

al to

cla

im

12 b

ecau

se th

ere

is

no d

istin

ct

disc

losu

re o

f in

ject

ing

mea

ns

that

doe

s not

in

clud

e ro

tary

ch

ambe

r.

17

whe

rein

the

rele

asin

g m

eans

is a

ro

tary

air

cham

ber

Tran

s Tec

h co

nten

ds th

at th

is

term

is n

ot

gove

rned

by

§112

(6).

(see

abo

ve

rega

rdin

g re

leas

ing

mea

ns a

nd ro

tary

ai

r cha

mbe

r)

inde

finite

bec

ause

th

e sp

ecifi

catio

n fa

ils to

iden

tify

stru

ctur

e th

at

corr

espo

nds t

o th

e

Cas

e 1:

16-c

v-01

778-

AT

D

ocum

ent 1

08

File

d 01

/11/

17

Pag

e 34

of 3

7

IPR Page 34

Page 35: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ...€¦ · A. Agreed Claim Construction Claim term Joint Construction plurality two or more Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108

A-3

1

Cla

im

Nos

. D

ispu

ted

Cla

im T

erm

or

Phr

ase

Plai

ntiff

’s

Prop

osed

C

onst

ruct

ion

Plai

ntiff

’s

Supp

ortin

g E

vide

nce

Def

enda

nts’

Pr

opos

ed

Con

stru

ctio

n

Def

enda

nts’

Su

ppor

ting

Evi

denc

e

No

cons

truct

ion

need

ed w

hen

rele

asin

g m

eans

is

prop

erly

con

stru

ed.

limita

tion

unde

r 35

U.S

.C. §

112

(6) i

n th

at th

e sp

ecifi

catio

n fa

ils

to d

iscl

ose

a st

ruct

ure

that

pe

rfor

ms t

he

reci

ted

func

tion

In th

e al

tern

ativ

e,

whe

rein

a ro

tary

air

cham

ber i

nclu

des

rele

asin

g m

eans

(as

prop

erly

con

stru

ed

abov

e)

Cla

im sc

ope

of

clai

m 1

7 is

id

entic

al to

cla

im

12 b

ecau

se th

ere

is

no d

istin

ct

disc

losu

re o

f re

leas

ing

mea

ns

that

doe

s not

Cas

e 1:

16-c

v-01

778-

AT

D

ocum

ent 1

08

File

d 01

/11/

17

Pag

e 35

of 3

7

IPR Page 35

Page 36: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ...€¦ · A. Agreed Claim Construction Claim term Joint Construction plurality two or more Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108

A-3

2

Cla

im

Nos

. D

ispu

ted

Cla

im T

erm

or

Phr

ase

Plai

ntiff

’s

Prop

osed

C

onst

ruct

ion

Plai

ntiff

’s

Supp

ortin

g E

vide

nce

Def

enda

nts’

Pr

opos

ed

Con

stru

ctio

n

Def

enda

nts’

Su

ppor

ting

Evi

denc

e

incl

ude

rota

ry

cham

ber.

Cas

e 1:

16-c

v-01

778-

AT

D

ocum

ent 1

08

File

d 01

/11/

17

Pag

e 36

of 3

7

IPR Page 36

Page 37: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN ...€¦ · A. Agreed Claim Construction Claim term Joint Construction plurality two or more Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

ATLANTA DIVISION

TRANS TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. HENDRICKSON USA, L.L.C.; QUEST GLOBAL, INC.; AND GREAT DANE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Defendants.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-cv-1778-AT

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of

Court using the CM-ECF System which will automatically send e-mail notification

to all counsel of record.

This the 11th day of January, 2017.

/s/ John L. North John L. North Ga. Bar No. 545580

Case 1:16-cv-01778-AT Document 108 Filed 01/11/17 Page 37 of 37

IPR Page 37