RUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTDISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

j [ u d d e t c mM

u O

nem oO RUNSVSS IqbnPkklJ

t d[ n RUM SQRU

s lM

qM

O

h xO tM c nO kM k bO kM t eO uM b nO nM s tO bM d eM n fO nM e xO sM k hO tM e nO cM kOM i e dM l mO tM

eM

NN

u dM

o eO

m d oO RUNNQQSQT IqbnPkklJ

I RUNNQQSWR IqbnPkklJM RUNNQQSWW IqbnPkklJM RUNNQQVVR IqbnPkklJJ

DEFENDANTS CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT PURSUANT TOPRETRIAL ORDER NUMBER ONE

q q p oO RM e u d IuJM

u cM jOM u d tM jO M u d nM

POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ E c] FJ

SuOMR h xO tM c nO kM k bO kM t eO

uM b nO nM s tO bM d eM n fO nM e

xO sM k hO tM e nO cM kOM i e dM l mO

t I j e M uM u cM jOM

u d tM jO M u d nM uOM

b d t IbdtJM eJS

[T

I. DESCRIPTION OF THE CASE

A. Overview of the Data Breach Litigation

p e RZM SQRTM u

u I e cJM

u vOtO

o SX e RVM SQRTO u M I

dJ u

R u u O S uM u cM jOM u d tM jO M u d nM uO nem oO RUNSVSS g c e mmq n G g mmqO g c e u j e t dO bdt c G nM qObO T p b TQM SQRUM d c d q p oORO d d d O q O

POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ F c] FJ

T e cO b d q p oO RM

d [

I d dJM

I c dJM

dO oO RUNSQT I t dJO b

n XM SQRUM YR d dM SY c dM U t d

dOU

B. The Consumer Cases

1. Plaintiffs Allegations5

q YR d dM TY

M u

u o SX e RV O u

d d u

e c u

O

o YR d d

RQQ O u

[

U b d q p oO RM Schafer d d c dO g M Schafer d dO V u YR d dO

POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ G c] FJ

U" t IZ JM

IRQ JM IRR

JM IW JM

IS JM IR

JM IS JM IZ JM

IR JM IST JM

IRR JM IX

JM IT J\

" t

IT JM

IvebqJ ISW J\

" g e k bM g

d s bM g e q bM g t d

bO

q VQ d d

O u d d q

M u

M SX O u d d q IJ

\ IJ

\ IJ \ IJ \ IJ

\ IJ \ IJ M M

O

POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ H c] FJ

V2. Targets Defenses

u u

O u

O

The Consumer Case plaintiffs lack standing. u d d

e cO t

b jjj O Clapper v. Amnesty International USAM RTT tO dO

RRTYM RRUX ISQRTJ I

certainly impending M possible

OJ I J\ see also Polanco v. Omnicell,

Inc.M oO RTNRURX IomiPlnxJM SQRT xm WYSTSWVM IeOoOkO eO SWM SQRTJ I

ClapperJ\ In re Barnes & Noble Pin Pad Litig.M oO RSNN

YWRXM SQRT xm UXVZVYY IoOeO jO tO TM SQRTJ IJO p d d

O c

O ClapperM RTT tOdO RRVRO nM u

u

vOtO O u M

M I JM

POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ I c] FJ

W g s bO

The allegations fail to state claims. u d d

RQQ M s

RSIJIWJO u M

O gM

e c

OW tM

vebq M

O See In re Sony Gaming Networks and Customer Data

Security Breach Litig. SQRU xm SSTWXX KTVNUR ISonyJ ItOeO dO kO SRM SQRUJ

I gM nM o zM u vebq

JO uM

g d s b IgdsbJM M M

O See id. KVU I gdsb J\ id. ZXU I

J\ In re Zappos.com, Inc.M Customer Data Security Breach Litig.M SQRT

xm UYTQUZXM KTNU IeO oO tO ZM SQRTJ IZapposJ I

JO

Plaintiffs will be unable to certify a classO b M

W f M u M O

POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ J c] FJ

Xd d O b M

NN X

M see Mazza v. Am. Honda Motor CoOM WWW gOT VYRM VZW IZ dO SQRSJ I

JM

M M M

u O See, e.g.M HannafordM SZT gOsOeO SR IeO n

nO SQM SQRTJ I

J\ In re TJX Companies Retail Sec. Breach Litig.M SUW

gOsOeO TYZM TZS IeO nO oO SZM SQQXJ ITJXJ I

JO

j

s STIJISJ t

d Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesM RTR tO dO

X b M d d O iM M see, e.g.M In re Sony Gaming Networks & Customer Data Sec. Breach Litig.M SQRUvOtO eO mfyjt XTVTM KXV ItOeO dO kO SRM SQRUJM NN O f d M b jjj O See, e.g.M In re Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Implants Products Liab. Litig.MZX gOT RQVQM RQVV IY dO RZZWJ Ix M OJ\ In reMedtronic, Inc., Implantable Defibrillators Litig.M UWV gO tO S YYWM YZS IeO nO SQQWJO x M M d M NN O See In re TMJ ImplantsProducts Liab. Litig.M ZX gOT RQVVO

POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ K c] FJ

YSVURM SVVR ISQRRJO

3. Affiliated Computer Services[Related to Reynoso v. Target and Affiliated Computer Services,Inc., No. 14-cv-346 (D. Minn.)]

bdt O u

Reynoso d d uM supraM

bdt j

M fqqjd nd IfqqjdJO u j

bdt j d g e

c q b oO

bdt M M M

M

M O

bdt u e supraO j M

bdt O

4. Procedural Status

Status of DiscoveryO o d d

N o

e j O u M

k hO j

Pietanza M f e o zM k d

b RYM SQRUO

u Pietanza k d

POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ L c] FJ

Z e nM

O o u Pietanza

M q p oO RM O j

M d d

MY M

O

Other Motion Practice. d d o

e j u

IJ\ IJ\

IJ\

IJ\ M

Damasco v. Clearwire Corp.M WWS gOT YZR IX dO SQRRJOZ u

Rippy t e j

d d dM dM jM

O

Parties Opposing Transfer to this DistrictO p b UM SQRUM k q

Y q Due Fratelli d d d dM jM e SXM SQRTM o e jO u M M k WM SQRUO k h o e j O Z q u N O

POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ M c] FJ

RQ

n m IkqnmJ d u p IdupNRJ

d c dM

O w jO

nd jOM N M Christensen v. Target Corp.M oO

RT"QRRTW IeO vJM O w nd

kqnm b STM SQRUM

e v M M kqnm

d u p Christensen e

vO s n RVM SQRUO

5. Related State-Court Litigation

b M

O

6. Predictions as to the Total Number of Cases

u YR d dO d d

O j M M

O c M VNRQ

d d O

C. The Bank Cases

1. Plaintiffs Allegations

q c d

e cO u

c d

POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ ED c] FJ

RR

IJ

\ IJ

N

\ IJ N

O u

M M c d O

o SX c d TQ

O u [

" t IR JM

IT JM IU

JM IR JM IY JM IU

JM IU JM

IR JM IR J\

" t vebq IX

J\

" g hNmNc b

s j d p IsjdpJ bO

q ST c d

O u c d

O u c d

IJ \ IJ

\ IJ M M \ IJ

POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ EE c] FJ

RS

sjdp b\ IJ

\ IJ \ IJ \ IJ

M M O

2. Targets Defenses

u u

O u

O

The allegations fail to state claims. m d d M

c d O b TJX

M c d

O See TJXM VSU gO tO S YTM YY IeO nO SQQXJO d

M

O See Sovereign Bank v. BJs Wholesale Club, IncOM VTT gOT RWSM RXZ

IT dO SQQXJ I J\ TJXM

VSU gO tO S ZR I JO

Plaintiffs will be unable to certify a classO b TJX M c d

I J O b

TJXM |~

M

O TJXM SUW gOsOeO TZSO u TJX

POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ EF c] FJ

RT

|~ |~

N \

O h

O O O O O

O O jM NNM NNM

O Id. TZWNZXO w

c d

DukesM RTR tO dO SVVRO m d dM c d

O See MazzaM WWW gOT VZWO

3. Procedural Status

o c dO

4. Related State-Court Litigation

u

O

5. Predictions as to the Total Number of Cases

u SY c dO u c d

O c M VNRQ c d O

D. The Shareholder Cases

1. Plaintiffs Allegations

g u

POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ EG c] FJ

RU

uO e IJ j e

Iu RS M RR M u d

g pM u d j pJ\ IJ uM

eO

u t d j e

uM e cM u

e c u O t d

j e uO

t d j e

M M M O

t d IJ M IJ

u M IJ

u j e M IJ

M M O

2. Individual Defendants Defenses

u e

O e

O

The actions should be dismissed due to Plaintiffs failure to make pre-suit

demand. c I J uM t d

u M

POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ EH c] FJ

RV

O See gO sO dO qO STORO

t d

n I u n

JO See Winter v. Farmers Educ. & Co-operative Union, RQX oOxOS SSWM STU

InO RZWRJ I

JO t d M

O j M

u RS M

n c d b IncdbJ

O nO tO TQSbOSURM O RO

c M

N O

The director defendants are shielded from liability by Targets Amended and

Restated Articles of Incorporation. d ncdbM u b

s b j |~ O O O

|u~ M

M

O See bO jw

nO tO TQSbOSVRM O UO b t d

M M b jwO uM

POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ EI c] FJ

RW

O

The allegations fail to state claims. u j e

M

u M

O See nO tO TQSbOSVRM O RO o

t d I t d

M J

j e O p

j e e c

O

3. Procedural Status

b t dM

O o O

4. Related State-Court Litigation

u i

d e dM Beth Koeneke v. Roxanne S. Austin, et al., oO SXNN

RUNRYTS Ik m kO nM JO u Koeneke

M M M

t dO p b RRM SQRUM Koeneke

t d dM M

Koeneke O u e k RSM

SQRUO q n M

POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ EJ c] FJ

RX

ZQ O e

Koeneke n

O

5. Predictions as to the Total Number of Cases

j u N

dM i d e dO iM

M

M O u

c e c O

u t dO

II. LEAD AND LIAISON COUNSEL

A. Defendants Views as to Appropriate Lead and Liaison Counsel

e

d d c dO q t d

m d m d O e

t d O

e d m d m

d

O u M e

RU d m d m d

nemM M

POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ EK c] FJ

RY

nem d O

B. Guidelines Concerning Plaintiffs Counsel Timekeeping

d M e

O u

O u

dO

j

M see, e.g.M In re HardiePlank Fiber Cement Siding

Litig.M nem g oO RSNNQSTVZNnkeNmjc IeO nO pO TM SQRSJ IeM kOJ\

hM fdg oO URXM In Re Idevice Address Book Litig.M oO T[RTNNQQUVTNktu

IoOeO dO oO SSM SQRTJM nem O See d

n p oO RM fdg oO SRM In re Heartland Payment Systems, Inc. Data

Security Breach LitigOM oO iNQZNneNQSQUW ItOeO uO bO SYM SQQZJ\ g

q pM fdg oO SSM In re Hannaford Bros. Co. Customer Data Security

Breach LitigationM oO S[QYNneNRZVU IeO nO k SVM SQQYJO jM e

In re

HardiePlank nem eO u

d d

dO Iq p oO RM fdg oO U VOJ

POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ EL c] FJ

RZ

III. PLEADINGS

A. Service Status

Consumer Cases. q u I u

J d d except [ Alvarez v. TargetM

oO RUNdwNRSZ IoOeO dOJ\ Bess v. TargetM oO RUNdwNSWS IeO tOdOJ\ Crawford v.

TargetM oO RUNdwNSQXR IxOeO uOJ\ Ellison v. TargetM oO RUNdwNSQZ IfOeO qOJ\

Guzman v. TargetM oO RTNdwNVZVT IoOeO dOJ\ Kirschenstein v. TargetM oO RUNdwN

RUVQ IdOeO dOJ\ Klein v. TargetM oO RTNdwNRZXU IdOeO dOJ\ Marciniszyn v. TargetM

oO RUNdwNRRT IeO d\ dO t dJ\ Switzer v. TargetM

oO RTNdwNRTRZ ItOeO jOJO

q Reynoso v. Target and Affiliated Computer Services, Inc.M oO RUNN

TUW IeO nOJ b d tO

Bank Cases. q u I u

J c d except [ Animas Credit Union v.

TargetM oO RUNdwNSZS IeO oOnOJ\ Commercial Bancshares, Inc. v. TargetM oO RUNdwN

UQRS IxOeO bOJ\ First NBC Bank v. TargetM oO RUNdwNRQRS IfOeO mOJ\ North

Districts Community Credit Union v. TargetM oO RUNdwNRXV IxOeO qOJO

Shareholder Cases. b t

dO

B. Waiver of Service

u

M e d M

POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ EM c] FJ

SQ

gO sO dO qO UIJO u

eO

C. Consolidated Complaints

j M

O

h

dM M

d dMRQ c dM t

dORR q TQ

d d d m d dM cM

t d m dO

D. Deadline to Answer or Otherwise Respond

e

UV d dO

IV. PROPOSED MOTION SCHEDULE

A. Motions to Dismiss

e

RQ u Schafer d d Schafer c d O RR u t d O See t s d s bM b m dM s jM fdg oO TS RUM Kulla v. TargetCorp. et al.M oO RUNNQQSQTNqbnNkkl IbO TM SQRUJO

POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ FD c] FJ

SR

[

" q

TQ O

" e SR

O

q M

d

O

j M

TQ

O

B. Motions to Amend the Pleadings or Add Parties

b d

d WQ e

d dO b

c d WQ u

c dO b

t d WQ

t d

C. Other Motions

u N

s SWIJ t wOd

POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ FE c] FJ

SS

O

V. DISCOVERY

A. Discovery Coordination

j M

d dM c dM t dO

d d m d dM cM t d m

d

O

B. Discovery Stayed until Resolution of Motions to Dismiss

b N

d O

C. Parties to Confer Regarding Discovery Following Resolution ofMotions to Dismiss

q s SWIJ

RU

d s RW

O

j d c d

d O b M

d d e q n

e qO e d d e q

u I

POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ FF c] FJ

ST

d dJ O

e n e q

d

O b

n e qO u s SWIJ

M O

D. E-Discovery

1. Preservation of Electronically Stored Information

x TQ d d m d

dM cM t d m dM

IftjJ O h

M [ IRJ

ftj \ ISJ

ftj \ ITJ ftj

O u

O

j ftj M

gO sO dO qO SWIJISJIdJ SWIJIRJIcJIJO u

M M O

POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ FG c] FJ

SU

2. Meet and Confer Regarding Document Search and ProductionFormats

b s SWIJ t wOdM

M

M ftj ftj

M IJ ftjO b ftj

O u

O

3. Document Production and Repositories

e d d m d I

J O

q M M

d d m

dO

VI. COORDINATION WITH STATE COURT LITIGATION

u O

u d

O u

Koeneke i

d e dO

VII. SETTLEMENT

q kqnm M M M

POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ FH c] FJ

SV

u O u

kqnm

nem

O u

u

O

VIII. TRIAL DATES.

j

IJ d eO

e[ n XM SQRU Px kO x x kO xM no DRRXQVV n bO qM no DSQTZUU gbfhsf cblfs ebojfmt mmqSSQQ x g d ZQ t t t nM no VVUQS IWRSJ XWWNXQQQ

IWRSJ XWWNRWQQOagceO OagceO

Local Counsel for Defendants TargetCorporation, Target Brands, Inc., TargetCorporate Services, Inc., TargetCorporation of Minnesota, and Target.comin MDL No. 14-2522; Counsel forDefendants in Consolidated ProceedingNo. 14-cv-203.

e[ n XM SQRU Ps l i kO nfM db DWWXYRK k xO mM db DYVXXWK n kO bM db DRVUYRQK s lM db DSRTSSSK

POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ FI c] FJ

SW

npssjtpo G gpfstufs mmq

USV n t t gM d ZURQVNSUYS IURVJ SWYNXQQQ

IURVJ SWYNXVSSinfaO kmaO nbaO slaO

e gO neM db DRSVYQWK npssjtpo G gpfstufs mmqXQX x c m bM d ZQQRXNTVUT ISRTJ YZSNVSQQ

ISRTJ YZSNVUVUeneaO

K b pro hac vice q p oO R

Counsel for Defendants TargetCorporation, Target Brands, Inc., TargetCorporate Services, Inc. , TargetCorporation of Minnesota, and Target.comin MDL No. 14-2522.

e[ n XM SQRU Pc qO c c qO cM DSQZXYY k s nM DTYXTTQ cfsfot G njmmfsM qObO

YQ t f tM t TXSQ nM no VVUQS IWRSJ TUZNWRXR

IWRSJ TUZNWURW IgJ aO aO

Attorneys for Defendant AffiliatedComputer Services, Inc.

NTUQWWWU

POXR DNEHBZfBDDFDGBWOVBTTU QcZea\bd GL S_`\[ DICDLCEH WY^\ FJ c] FJ

Bank Cases