improving transportation through innovative engineering some personal rapid transit activities peter...
TRANSCRIPT
Improving Transportation ThroughInnovative Engineering
Some Personal Rapid Transit Activities
Peter Muller
Some Personal Rapid Transit Activities
Peter Muller
ATRA TECHNIX 2010
Improving Transportation ThroughInnovative Engineering
Village West DevelopmentPersonal Rapid Transit Case Study
Village West DevelopmentPersonal Rapid Transit Case Study
Improving Transportation ThroughInnovative Engineering
Village West Results
• Benefit/cost ratio 2.57• Increased annual sales tax $19.6M • Annualized capital and operating costs
over ten years $21.7M• $0.52 fare per trip covers shortfall• After ten years $1.00 per trip pays
operating costs.
Improving Transportation ThroughInnovative Engineering
13 Miles of Guideway30 Stations
Fort Carson Army Post
Improving Transportation ThroughInnovative Engineering
Net Annual Costs/BenefitsCOSTS (M) BENEFITS (M)
Capital 17.04 Travel Time 24.89
O&M 15.34 Auto Costs 27.84
Emission Reductions
5.02
Accident Costs 18.74
Totals 32.38 76.13
Benefit/Cost Ratio = 2.35
Improving Transportation ThroughInnovative Engineering
Costs vs. Revenues
• 16.93M annual passengers• $1.66 per ride covers all net costs• $230 federal employee monthly transit
allowance• 29,034 active military @ $230 per month =
$80.14M annually• Bonding on fare revenue only is not typical
Improving Transportation ThroughInnovative Engineering
Comparison with RailDulles Rail
ProjectVancouver Automated
Mid-Jordan LRT
Extension
Fort Carson
PRT Project
Miles of track 23 (2-way) 12 (2-way) 11 (2-way) 23 (1-way)
Stations 11 16 9 35
Daily pax 60,000 100,000 9,500 53,500
Capital cost $5,200M $1,870 $428M $529M
Cost per mile $113M $78M $19M $23M
Cost per stn $473M $117M $48M $15M
Cost per annual pax
$290 $62 $150 $33
Type Corridor Corridor Corridor Network
Improving Transportation ThroughInnovative Engineering
Fort Carson Phase II
• Capitalization• System Extension• Benefit/Cost• Life-cycle Sustainability Performance
Improving Transportation ThroughInnovative Engineering
BWI AirportAPM PRT
Miles of dual-lane guideway 5.7 3.6Miles of single-lane guideway - 7.7Stations 15 37In-terminal service -Seated travel -Time CONRAC to Term C (mins) 14 10
Daily ridership 61,400 58,817Capital cost (millions US$) 1,194 387Annual operating cost (M$) 13 12
Improving Transportation ThroughInnovative Engineering
• In addition– 47% of net increase in GHGs since 1990 due to
transportation– Transportation contributes 34% of all GHGs– We must reduce energy used AND change
primary source
Problems with Conventional Transport
Improving Transportation ThroughInnovative Engineering
How to Get Into PRT• Stakeholder Workshop• Public Outreach• Route Planning• Ridership Projections• Benefit/Cost Evaluation• Risk Analysis & Mitigation• Business Plan• Implementation Plan• Permitting• Procurement• Testing & Certification
Improving Transportation ThroughInnovative Engineering
Technical Papers
• A Simple PRT Control System– Explores the limits of synchronized control
systems• Ride Sharing in Extensive PRT Networks
– Explores ride sharing methodologies for city-wide PRT systems
Improving Transportation ThroughInnovative Engineering
Contact InformationContact Information
Peter MullerPRT Consulting, Inc.
1340 Deerpath Trail, Ste 200Franktown, CO 80116
Ph: 303-532-1855Cell: 720-318-4795
Fax: (303) 309-1913Twitter: http://twitter.com/PRTGuru
www.prtconsulting.com