improvements to the lisbon system
TRANSCRIPT
Improvements to the Lisbon Improvements to the Lisbon SystemSystem
Saravanan ASaravanan APhD CandidatePhD Candidate
RGSOIPLRGSOIPL
Lisbon at a Glance
What leads to improvement for Lisbon System?
Working Group on the Development of Lisbon
System
Different Sessions of WG Comparison of Lisbon 1958 & Geneva Act 2015
Images, content, and published articles are for reference and illustrative purposes only. Under no circumstances should any image, logo, content or article be viewed as an endorsement for this presentation or any of its contents. This presentation is intended for educational purposes only.
3
Difference between AOOs & GIs:
• AOOs (Lisbon, Art.2)• Geographical denomination• Refers to quality or characteristics of a
specific product• Due exclusively or essentially to the
geographical environment (natural or human factors)
• AOO= Special category of GI• Only existing multilateral
registration system for the protection of AOOs
• Link with the place of origin is stronger in the case of an appellation of origin
• GIs (TRIPS, Art.22.1)• Indication • Refers to quality, reputation, or other
characteristic • Essentially attributable to its
geographical origin
GI can also be a symbol referring to or associated with a particular geographical area (e.g. the cartographic outline of France with a red itinerary for Burgundy wines)
International system that facilitate the protection geographical indications, i.e. “appellations of origin”, in countries other than the country of origin
By means of their registration with WIPO through a single single procedureprocedure, for a minimum of formalities and expense
Concluded in 1958 and revised at Stockholm in 1967, EIF on Sept 25, 1966 & Amended in 1979
Total Contracting Parties- 28 Administered by International Bureau International Bureau of WIPO
Keeps international register international register & publish bulletin ‘Appellations of origin’ ‘Lisbon ExpressLisbon Express’ database – to search AOO registered under
Lisbon Agreement
1) Failure of Worldwide system of higher protection for geographical denominations
Agreement has notnot been widely successfulwidely successful Total 28 members 28 members & appx 1/3rd joined since conclusion of
TRIPS Largely concentrated in the Mediterranean WorldMediterranean World
Algeria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Congo, Costa Rica, Cuba, Czech Republic, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, France, Gabon, Georgia, Greece, Haiti, Hungary, Iran, Israel, Italy, Mexico, Montenegro, Morocco, Nicaragua, Peru, Portugal, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Spain, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Togo, Tunisia, Turkey
2) Entries of AOO – only on limited products3) Register shows AOO emanate from fewer than ten
countries (as of 2010) 11 countries hold 97.5% of all entries Top three hold over 78% One Country (France) alone hold 62.5% of total entries
Out of that 90% are for Wines & Spirits only)
4) Failure of negotiation in TRIPS Council To settle the operating principles Multilateral system for registration of GIs led to examination of led to examination of
Lisbon AgreementLisbon Agreement
Source: Daniel J Gervais, 11 Chi. J. Int'l L. 67 (2011)
Source: Daniel J Gervais, 11 Chi. J. Int'l L. 67 (2011)
Sept 2008, assembly of the Lisbon Union established a working group working group (WG)
Responsible for exploring possible improvements possible improvements to procedures under the Lisbon
To make it more attractive more attractive for users and prospective prospective new members While, preservepreserve the principles and objectives of the Lisbon Since 2009Since 2009, the Working Group has engaged in a full
review of the Lisbon International Registration System Possible extension to geographical indications Possible extension to geographical indications in addition to
appellations of origin
Various Sessions of WG Engaged in several meetings Submitted drafts & also proposed changes to Lisbon
System Total 10 Sessions Held at Geneva, Switzerland Participants:
Contracting Parties, Observers Representatives of International Intergovernmental Organizations
(WTO, EC, FAO, EU) Representatives of International non-governmental Organizations
(INTA, ABPI, ECTA, OriGIn, AIPPI)
Statement of grant Statement of grant of protection – new optional procedures new optional procedures to notify and record a statement of grant of protection of an appellation of origin
Administrative Instructions Administrative Instructions – new Rule new Rule in Lisbon Regulations to allow Director General to establish Administrative Instructions
that may facilitate the operationfacilitate the operation of the Lisbon system
Administrative Instructions could provide for electronic electronic communicationscommunications, including –
notification of AO registrations by WIPO – identical starting date to compute refusal period
communications to WIPO from Members agreed modes for electronic signatureelectronic signature
First Session of the Working Group agreed agreed – International Bureau submit to the Assembly of the Lisbon
Union (September 2009) draft new Rules 11bis and 23bis, draft new Rules 11bis and 23bis, and amendment of Rule 22and amendment of Rule 22
WG also agreed: International Bureau (IB) to conduct a survey conduct a survey among all
members, non-members, interested IGOs, NGOs To ascertain how the Lisbon system might be improvedhow the Lisbon system might be improved
To Conduct a study on relationship study on relationship between regional system (for protection of GI) & the Lisbon system
To examine the conditions for possibility of future accessionspossibility of future accessions
Results of the Survey:Results of the Survey: Most delegations in favour of two separate definitionstwo separate definitions
One for AOO- in line with Art 2 of Lisbon Agreement Other on GI- in line with Art 22.1 of TRIPS
No opposition No opposition for extending protection to traditional non-geographical denominations
No No need for any improvement improvement on Application and Registration procedures
No support No support for registration of designs or images as AOdesigns or images as AO
WG agreed to invite Secretariat to prepare,Secretariat to prepare, Study on possibility of dispute settlement possibility of dispute settlement within the Lisbon To explore in which situation explore in which situation DS might be appropriate and in what
form
DraftDraft provisions on certain matters addressed:
Proposed amendments to Rule 5(3) and Rule 16(1)amendments to Rule 5(3) and Rule 16(1) of
Lisbon Regulations
Also Agreed that, WG had made considerable progress considerable progress on
the development of the Lisbon system
WG had requestedrequested the secretariat to prepare a Draft New prepare a Draft New
InstrumentInstrument (DNI)
Basis for Protection and Definition: (Art 2 & 3) Art 3 should be drafted in a less complex mannerless complex manner Should follow more closelyclosely to the current definitions
Scope of Protection: (Art 4 & 9) Agreed to provide, high and uniform level high and uniform level of protection for bothboth AO
& GI Which might allow for a larger membership
Several delegations are in favour to maintain Lisbon Agreement in combination with a Protocol combination with a Protocol to it
Requested Secretariat to prepareprepare Draft New Instrument (DNIDNI) & Draft Regulation (DRDR)
Further discussions regarding the legal form legal form of the DNI and its possible implications possible implications (Revised Lisbon Agreement, New Treaty/Protocol supplementing the Agreement)
Revised texts & observations made and incorporate alternative provisions and different options alternative provisions and different options between brackets
Ex: -Separate instruments /independent GI and AO definitions
Single or dual level of protection / single or dual Register
Revised and simplified versions Revised and simplified versions of the DNI and the DR to be prepared by the Secretariat for its 6th session
WG clarified, Diplomatic Conference Diplomatic Conference certainly to be
convened by the Assembly for revising the Lisbon
Agreement
WG agreed to establish an electronic forum establish an electronic forum
To enrich the debate enrich the debate and improving the substantive work
Secretariat would organize a workshop on DS workshop on DS within the
Lisbon System as a side event
WG reiterated general commitment to two-fold mandatetwo-fold mandate
RevisionRevision of Lisbon Agreement
EstablishmentEstablishment of an international registration system
Wide support for one single DNI covering one single DNI covering
Both AOO & GI Both AOO & GI with separate definitions
Establishment of single international register single international register cover both AO
& GI
WG examined Chapters I to IV Chapters I to IV of DNI and DR
Detailed discussion on Art 13Art 13 (Safeguards in Respect of
other Rights) of the DNI
WG approve the recommendation made to Lisbon
Assembly to convene a Diplomatic Conference convene a Diplomatic Conference for adoption
of Revised Lisbon Agreement in 2015
WG examined in detail examined in detail all the provisions of DNI &
DR
Welcomed the significant progress significant progress from members,
observers and non members to convene a successful
Diplomatic Conference in 2015
Half-day conference on DS conference on DS within Lisbon System had
been held as a side event of current session
Purpose was to indentify key provisions indentify key provisions in DNI & DR taken
to Diplomatic Conference
WG concluded some pending issuesconcluded some pending issues, Title Title and Preamble Preamble of DNI
Possible introduction introduction of Maintenance fees fees (Art 7.2.b) & Individual
fees (Art 7.4)
Safeguarding rights in respect of prior trademark rights prior trademark rights (Art 13.1)
Issues of promoting transparency promoting transparency (R 5.5.iii) & amount of fees (R
8.1)
SettledSettled some issues on, Title & Preamble Whether Art 9.1 should be kept & Art 9.2 to be moved to Art
6 Whether Art 10.2, r/w Art 15.2, should refer to any other or
to more extensive protection
Some pending issuespending issues includes, Fee provisions, scope of protection, protection against
becoming generic, safeguards in respect of prior trademark rights
Phasing out periods for prior use (if any) and where prior use was not raised as a ground for refusal
Took place at WIPO HQ
Aim was to adopt a new Act adopt a new Act of the Lisbon Agreement for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and their International Registration
Which would render the Lisbon System more attractive for states and users, while preserving its principles and objectives
Negotiators approved a revision Negotiators approved a revision of an international registration system providing protection for names that identify the Geographical Origin of products
OutcomeOutcome of the diplomatic conference and called the adoption adoption of the Geneva Act Geneva Act a “transcendental momenttranscendental moment” for the Lisbon Union and WIPO
Geneva Act helps to promotepromote globally marketed products Other changesOther changes affect
fee provisions, scope of protection, protection against becoming generic, and safeguards for respect of prior trademark rights
The Geneva Act will enter into force enter into force three months after five eligible parties have deposited their instruments of ratification or accession
Total 11- Total 11- Bosnia and Herzegovina, Burkina Faso, Congo, France, Gabon, Hungary, Italy, MaliMali, Nicaragua, Peru, Portugal, RomaniaRomania, Togo
None has deposited None has deposited their instrument yet EIF
New definitionNew definition of AOs and GIs and of their scopescope of protection FlexibilityFlexibility about how countries may provide protection for AOs and
GIs, including through trademarktrademark system if no AO or GI system is in place
Safeguards for prior trademark rights Safeguards for prior trademark rights and other prior rights such as personal names, plant varieties or animal breed denominations
Infringement proceedingsInfringement proceedings may be initiated by any public authority or interested party (Art 14)
Accession to the Geneva Act is open to international organizations open to international organizations competent for GI protection (e.g. European Union and African Intellectual Property Organization)
Countries may request payment of an individual feeindividual fee GrantGrant of protection will be notifiednotified The changes are designed specifically to attract new members attract new members to the
Lisbon Agreement
S No Lisbon Agreement 1958 Geneva Act 2015
1 Total Articles- 18 34342 Subject Matter:
Art 2- Appellations of OriginBoth,Both,A 2(i)- Appellations of OriginA 2 (ii)- Geographical Indications
3 Content of Protection: - Art 3: True Origin: ensured against any usurpation or imitation- Translated Form: kind, type, make, imitation, or the like
- A. 11: True Origin: Imitation onlyImitation only- Translated Form: style, kind, type, make, imitation, method, as produced in, like, similar or the like
4 Application for International Registration:Not clearly mentioned
-Detailed Application procedure (A 5) & - International Registration (A 6)
5 Fee Payment: SingleSingle Fee- for each AOO (Art 7) - Fee Reduction Fee Reduction for Developing & LDC (A 7)
- Individual fee (A 7. 4.a)- not higher than ot higher than equivalent amountequivalent amount required under national or regional legislation - Non Payment (A 7.4.b)- protection is renounced renounced
6 Period of Validity: Art 7Not mentioned the period Protection(Art. 8.1)- IndefinitelyIndefinitely
Cancellation (Art 8.2.a)- At the request At the request of natural person or legal entity competent Authority may request Intl Bureau to cancel International Registration
7 Safeguards in respect of Other Rights: Not listed
Prior Trademark Rights- Acquired in good faith good faith (A 13.1) Rights Based on Plant Variety or Animal Breed Denomination: (A 13.3) Members can use plant variety or animal breed denomination exceptexcept in a manner to misleadmislead the public
8 Refusal & Other actions:
Not discussed
Art 15: RefusalRefusal and Other Actions in Respect of International RegistrationsA 15.1: Time limit-Time limit- Specified in the RegulationsA 15.5: Applicable of National TreatmentNational TreatmentA 16: Withdrawal of Refusal- Shall be recordedrecorded in International Register
9 Notification of Grant of Protection:Not discussed
International Bureau shall recordrecord notification in International RegisterRegister and PublishPublish it (Art 18)