igg agenda – february 1st 2007

35
1 RMDS RMDS Retail Market Design Services www.rmdservice.com IGG Agenda – February 1st 2007 Minutes from last IGG meeting 10.00 – 10.10 Review of Action Items 10.10 – 10.20 CER Update 10.20 – 10.30 Gemserv Update 10.30 – 10.40 Market Operations Update 10.40 – 11.00 Networks SEM Update 11.00 – 12.30 Retail Market Design Service Update 12.30 – 12.40 Market Design Update 12.40– 12.50 Discussion Requests & Market Change Requests Next Steps 12.50 - 13.00

Upload: yoshi-mcfarland

Post on 03-Jan-2016

83 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

DESCRIPTION

Minutes from last IGG meeting10.00 – 10.10 Review of Action Items10.10 – 10.20 CER Update10.20 – 10.30 Gemserv Update 10.30 – 10.40 Market Operations Update 10.40 – 11.00 Networks SEM Update 11.00 – 12.30 Retail Market Design Service Update 12.30 – 12.40 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: IGG Agenda – February 1st 2007

1

RMDSRMDSRMDSRMDS Retail Market Design Services www.rmdservice.com

IGG Agenda – February 1st 2007

• Minutes from last IGG meeting 10.00 – 10.10

• Review of Action Items 10.10 – 10.20

• CER Update 10.20 – 10.30

• Gemserv Update 10.30 – 10.40

• Market Operations Update 10.40 – 11.00

• Networks SEM Update 11.00 – 12.30

• Retail Market Design Service Update 12.30 – 12.40

• Market Design Update 12.40– 12.50– Discussion Requests & Market Change Requests

• Next Steps 12.50 - 13.00

Page 2: IGG Agenda – February 1st 2007

2

RMDSRMDSRMDSRMDS Retail Market Design Services www.rmdservice.com

Minutes

• Minutes from IGG meeting – December 14th 2006

Page 3: IGG Agenda – February 1st 2007

3

RMDSRMDSRMDSRMDS Retail Market Design Services www.rmdservice.com

Action Items

• Actions Addressed in Advance of Meeting• Update on Action Items• Actions to be covered during remainder of

presentation• Actions to be carried forward• Other Action Items

Page 4: IGG Agenda – February 1st 2007

4

RMDSRMDSRMDSRMDS Retail Market Design Services www.rmdservice.com

Update on Action Items

• Action Item 4 – Review possibility of creating and providing dedicated MPRN data for use in all IPT tests

• ESB Networks ISC have agreed to this in principle• Draft proposal to issue from RMDS to ESB Networks ISC

Page 5: IGG Agenda – February 1st 2007

5

RMDSRMDSRMDSRMDS Retail Market Design Services www.rmdservice.com

Update on Action Items

• Action Item 8 – Provide update on date for data provision

– MCR 0083 refers – Customer Data DG 3 and higher will be available online in CSV

format to download.– 2 separate files: MPRN (File 1) and Meter details (file 2) – Expected to go live week beginning 19th February

Page 6: IGG Agenda – February 1st 2007

6

RMDSRMDSRMDSRMDS Retail Market Design Services www.rmdservice.com

Update on Action Items

• Action Item 9 – RMDS to investigate the procedural issue whereby a duplicate MPRN is generated when a quotation is ‘rolled back’

– In the early months post go-live, a bug was discovered in the New Connections process whereby a duplicate MPRN was generated when a new quotation superceded an old quotation (‘rolled back’) for the same physical site

– The defect was fixed and no further duplicate MPRNs were detected from the New Connections process

– The broader issue of Working Practice 13 will be covered later in the presentation

Page 7: IGG Agenda – February 1st 2007

7

RMDSRMDSRMDSRMDS Retail Market Design Services www.rmdservice.com

Update on Action Items

• Action Item 20– RMDS Draft Business Plan 2007

– Issued to MPs on the 5th January– To be discussed later in presentation

Page 8: IGG Agenda – February 1st 2007

8

RMDSRMDSRMDSRMDS Retail Market Design Services www.rmdservice.com

Actions to be covered during remainder of presentation

• Action Item 3 – Review Objections and Cancellations process

– Numbers with CER for Review– CER Update

Page 9: IGG Agenda – February 1st 2007

9

RMDSRMDSRMDSRMDS Retail Market Design Services www.rmdservice.com

Actions to be covered during remainder of presentation

• Action Item 5 – Review note detailing the difficulties surrounding suppression of withdrawal of CoS reads

– E-mail issued 3rd October– No feedback received– Request from one MP that this item should be left open until a

decision has been reached by CER– CER Update

Page 10: IGG Agenda – February 1st 2007

10

RMDSRMDSRMDSRMDS Retail Market Design Services www.rmdservice.com

Actions to be covered during remainder of presentation

• Action Item 10 –Update DR 0123 – Versioning of 341 message to include a table indicating how versioning will work

• DR 0123 has been updated, not yet circulated to MPs• Proposed versioning table covered later in the presentation

Page 11: IGG Agenda – February 1st 2007

11

RMDSRMDSRMDSRMDS Retail Market Design Services www.rmdservice.com

Action Items to be carried forward

• Action Item 6 – Investigate whether new 131 message could be issued for Special Read Request

– DR 0117 has been updated and will issue to MPs in the next week

Page 12: IGG Agenda – February 1st 2007

12

RMDSRMDSRMDSRMDS Retail Market Design Services www.rmdservice.com

Action Items to be carried forward

• Action Item 7 – Update MCC Guidance document

– Document in Final Review Stage

Page 13: IGG Agenda – February 1st 2007

13

RMDSRMDSRMDSRMDS Retail Market Design Services www.rmdservice.com

Action Items to be carried forward

• Action Item 13 – Prepare proposals on addresses in the Retail Market

– Document in Final Review Stage

Page 14: IGG Agenda – February 1st 2007

14

RMDSRMDSRMDSRMDS Retail Market Design Services www.rmdservice.com

Action Items to be carried forward

• Action Item 11 – Issue revised DR103- Vulnerable Customers

– Version 6.0 to issue following feedback

Page 15: IGG Agenda – February 1st 2007

15

RMDSRMDSRMDSRMDS Retail Market Design Services www.rmdservice.com

Actions to be covered during remainder of presentation

• Action Item 18 – Request Market Participants to review alternative proposal for MCR 0063 as outlined in the SEM slide presentation at the last IGG

– Covered in SEM presentation

Page 16: IGG Agenda – February 1st 2007

16

RMDSRMDSRMDSRMDS Retail Market Design Services www.rmdservice.com

CER Update

Page 17: IGG Agenda – February 1st 2007

17

RMDSRMDSRMDSRMDS Retail Market Design Services www.rmdservice.com

Gemserv Update

Page 18: IGG Agenda – February 1st 2007

18

RMDSRMDSRMDSRMDS Retail Market Design Services www.rmdservice.com

Market Operations Update

Page 19: IGG Agenda – February 1st 2007

19

RMDSRMDSRMDSRMDS Retail Market Design Service www.rmdservice.com

Retail Electricity Market Issues Update

Susan Morrissey, RMDS

Page 20: IGG Agenda – February 1st 2007

20

RMDSRMDSRMDSRMDS Retail Market Design Services www.rmdservice.com

Retail Electricity Market Issues Log

• Log continuing to issue on a weekly basis

• Summary Statistics (as per last release –31-01-2007)

– Total Number of Issues Logged 138

– Total ‘Closed’ 126– Total ‘In Progress’ 8– Total ‘Being Monitored’ 1– Total ‘Logged’ 3

– Issues Resulting in DRRs 9

– Total Raised Since Last Issue 0– Total Closed Since Last Issue 0

Page 21: IGG Agenda – February 1st 2007

21

RMDSRMDSRMDSRMDS Retail Market Design Service www.rmdservice.com

Retail Market Design Service Update

C. Madden, RMDS

Page 22: IGG Agenda – February 1st 2007

22

RMDSRMDSRMDSRMDS Retail Market Design Services www.rmdservice.com

Retail Market Design Service Update

– ESB Working days 2007/2008 issued on 5th January 2007– Draft Business Plan issued on 5th January 2007– Supplier Support Arrangements for 2007 issued on the 17th January

2007

Page 23: IGG Agenda – February 1st 2007

23

RMDSRMDSRMDSRMDS Retail Market Design Services www.rmdservice.com

Retail Market Design Service Update

• Working Practice 13 – Termination of Duplicate MPRNs

– Issues raised by one supplier:

1. ESB Networks Users are allowed to create duplicate mprns

– So far no case of duplicate MPRNs has been detected for MPRNs created after go-live of the central market system in January 2005.

– The cases of duplicate MPRNs so far detected and analysed relate to MPRNs created in the legacy systems prior to this. ESB Networks previously had a number of legacy systems linked by multiple interfaces allowing the creation of duplicate MPRNs due to poor cross-validation.

– It is important to note that the New Connections process as designed and implemented for SAP blocks the generation of a second MPRN for any connection point within the quotation accepted by the customer.

Page 24: IGG Agenda – February 1st 2007

24

RMDSRMDSRMDSRMDS Retail Market Design Services www.rmdservice.com

Retail Market Design Service Update

• Working Practice 13 – Termination of Duplicate MPRNs (contd)

– Issues raised by one supplier:

2. ESB Networks Users are allowed create duplicate quotations for one site address at New Connection

– The current New Connections process allows creation of multiple quotations for any site address. This facilitates customers changing their minds or this facilitates different parties applying for a new connection at the same one-off site. However once one of the offers is accepted, this changes the status of the MPRN in this offer to 'Assigned' , making only this MPRN available for registration for suppliers on the MP Extranet.

– While almost unheard of, it is theoretically possible for two offers be accepted and paid for through a customer error, this will be detected by the ESBN engineering officer long before the connection is built when s/he visits the site to design the connection.

Page 25: IGG Agenda – February 1st 2007

25

RMDSRMDSRMDSRMDS Retail Market Design Services www.rmdservice.com

Retail Market Design Service Update

• Working Practice 13 – Termination of Duplicate MPRNs (contd)

– Issues raised by one supplier:

3. Market systems allow mprn specific meter reads be allocated to multiple mprns

– Analysis of the duplicate MPRNs contradicts this perception. Reading validations apply to all meter readings received in ESB Networks systems. The meter reader must input either a valid meter reading or trigger the generation of an estimate for each MPRN via the handheld device. Analysis of duplicate MPRNs thus far indicates that actual readings are obtained for the first MPRN and estimate readings have been generated for the second MPRN.

Page 26: IGG Agenda – February 1st 2007

26

RMDSRMDSRMDSRMDS Retail Market Design Services www.rmdservice.com

Retail Market Design Service Update

• Working Practice 13 – Termination of Duplicate MPRNs (contd)

– Issues raised by one supplier:

4. Meter Readers do not recognise that there is an issue with duplicate mprns when entering reads

– Meter Readers will normally report duplicate MPRNs to the back office

Page 27: IGG Agenda – February 1st 2007

27

RMDSRMDSRMDSRMDS Retail Market Design Services www.rmdservice.com

Retail Market Design Service Update

• Working Practice 13 – Termination of Duplicate MPRNs (contd)

– Issues raised by one supplier:

5. A simple validation would be to prevent the Meter Serial Number & Meter Category Code existing at multiple mprns - this should prevent mprn specific meter reads being allocated to multiple mprns

Each meter has a unique serial number. The central market system does not permit a single meter to be present at more than one installation. MPRN specific

reads are covered by point no. 3

Page 28: IGG Agenda – February 1st 2007

28

RMDSRMDSRMDSRMDS Retail Market Design Service www.rmdservice.com

Discussion Requests & Market Change Requests

Susan Morrissey, RMDS

Page 29: IGG Agenda – February 1st 2007

29

RMDSRMDSRMDSRMDS Retail Market Design Services www.rmdservice.com

New Market Change Request

MCR 0127 - Decouple Connection Agreement requirement from Change of Supplier whereMIC >= 100kVA and there is no Change of Legal Entity

• Version 1 issued 31st January

• Feedback requested by 15th February

Page 30: IGG Agenda – February 1st 2007

30

RMDSRMDSRMDSRMDS Retail Market Design Services www.rmdservice.com

Discussion Request

DR 0113 – Supplier of Last Resort

Current Position• 2nd Clarifications Document issued to CER• SEM Team have highlighted a passage in the Trading and

Settlement Code which contradicts the assumption of a dedicated supplier unit per SoLR event –

“In the event that there are multiple defaults occurring at the same time, all retail customers affected by these default events will be managed under the one SoLR Supplier Unit unless the defaulting Supplier Unit is responsible for providing metered demand quantities that relate to a Trading Site with Non-Firm Access. “

Next Steps• Clarify issue relating to Trading and Settlement Code• On receipt of clarifications from CER the DR will be re-issued

Page 31: IGG Agenda – February 1st 2007

31

RMDSRMDSRMDSRMDS Retail Market Design Services www.rmdservice.com

Discussion Request

DR 0118 – Avoidance of Erroneous De-Registrations

• Feedback Received

Page 32: IGG Agenda – February 1st 2007

32

RMDSRMDSRMDSRMDS Retail Market Design Services www.rmdservice.com

Discussion Request

• DR 0123 – Versioning of 341 Messages

Page 33: IGG Agenda – February 1st 2007

33

RMDSRMDSRMDSRMDS Retail Market Design Services www.rmdservice.com

DR 0123 – New Table

Versioning Scenarios• The following table explains how the “Version Number” will work. • Column 1 one identifies five possible Scenarios. • Column 2 identifies the Aggregation cycle. • Column 3 identifies the time period associated with the aggregation cycle (D = day, M

= month). Column 4 indicates whether or not a reading is an estimate or an actual reading.

• Column 5 indicates the sending of a message. • Column 6 shows the version number.• NOTE The version number acts as a flag to indicate a change from an estimate

reading to an actual reading. The flag changes from 01 to 02. The flags themselves do not represent actual readings or estimate readings.

• Scenario 1 indicates actual readings from D+1. The version number does not to change as there are actual readings to work with from day 1

• Scenario 2 where estimates are only available at D+1, but between D+1 and D+4 an actual reading is sent. This matches the current process and no Version number change is required

• Scenario 3 where estimates are only available at D+4, but between D+4 and M+4 an actual reading is sent. The version number during this period, increments from 01 to 02 indicating the receipt of an actual reading that will replace an estimate reading.

• Scenario 4 where estimates are only available at M+4, but between M+4 and M+13 an actual reading is sent. The version number during this period, increments from 01 to 02 indicating the receipt of an actual reading that will replace in estimate reading.

• Scenario 5 where no actual reading has been received in 13 months. This may not be possible but it is important to cover all eventualities. In this case flag remains at 01.

Page 34: IGG Agenda – February 1st 2007

34

RMDSRMDSRMDSRMDS Retail Market Design Service www.rmdservice.com

Next Steps

• Proposed Diary dates for subsequent meetings

– 08.03.07– 19.04.07– 07.06.07 (proposed change from 31.05.07 – near

bank holiday)

Page 35: IGG Agenda – February 1st 2007

35

RMDSRMDSRMDSRMDS Retail Market Design Service www.rmdservice.com

Next Steps

• Propose to continue with conference call every two weeks – proposed dates

Suggest cancelling Conference Call scheduled for 8th February

– 22.02.07– 22.03.07– 04.04.07– 03.05.07– 17.05.07

• Call details will remain the same:–Number: 01-6647602 PIN : 77640 –Contingency number remains: 01-6647777 PIN: 60236