ifrs 15 – revenue from contracts with customers 15 revenue...answer multiple choice questions in...
TRANSCRIPT
IFRS 15 – Revenue from contracts with customers
Revenue: The Basics
PwC and ICPAU
Agenda
1) 5-Step model
2) Deep dive: performance obligations, including material rights
2
PwC and ICPAU
The 5-step model
3
Step 1 - Identify the contract with the customer
Step 2 - Identify the performance obligations in the contract
Step 3 - Determine the transaction price
Step 4 - Allocate the transaction price
Step 5 - Recognise revenue when (or as) a performance obligation is satisfied
Core principleRevenue recognised to depict transfer of goods or services
Step 2 - Identify the performance obligations in the contract
PwC and ICPAU
Revenue recognition model
A simple example….
• Contract: Entity A sells products X, Y and Z to Customer B
• Transaction price: CU18m, 50% upfront, 50% when all three delivered
• Stand alone price: Each sold separately for CU8m each
• Nature of products:
- Product X: Good, control transferred at a point in time
- Product Y: Good, control transferred at a point in time
- Service Z: Service transferred over one year
4
PwC and ICPAU
Revenue recognition model – a simple example
5
Step 1 - Identify the contract with the customer
Step 2 - Identify the performance obligations in the contract
Step 3 - Determine the transaction price
Step 4 - Allocate the transaction price
Step 5 - Recognise revenue when (or as) a performance obligation is satisfied
Step 1 – Signed contract exists
ContractAn agreement between two or more parties that creates
enforceable rights and obligations (not necessarily written)
• Approved
• Rights of each party identified
• Payment terms identified
• Commercial substance
• Collectibility
PwC and ICPAU
Revenue recognition model – a simple example
6
Step 2 - Identify the performance obligations in the contract
Step 3 - Determine the transaction price
Step 4 - Allocate the transaction price
Step 5 - Recognise revenue when (or as) a performance obligation is satisfied
Step 1 – Signed contract existsStep 2 – Customer B can benefit from X, Y and Z separately as they are sold separately – three separate performance obligations
Performance obligation:
A promise in a contract with a customer to transfer a good or service to the customer
Implicit Explicit Written Verbal
DistinctAND
PwC and ICPAU
Revenue recognition model – a simple example
7
Step 3 - Determine the transaction price
Step 4 - Allocate the transaction price
Step 5 - Recognise revenue when (or as) a performance obligation is satisfied
Step 1 – Signed contract exists
Step 2 – Customer B can benefit from X, Y and Z separately as they are sold separately – three separate performance obligations
Step 3 – The transaction price is fixed at CU18m.
Transaction price = Amount to which entity expects to be entitled in exchange for transferring goods or services
• Highly probable?
• Subject to significant reversal?
PwC and ICPAU
Step 3 – The transaction price is fixed at CU18m.
Revenue recognition model – a simple example
8
Step 4 - Allocate the transaction price
Step 5 - Recognise revenue when (or as) a performance obligation is satisfied
Step 1 – Signed contract exists
Step 2 – Customer B can benefit from X, Y and Z separately as they are sold separately - three separate performance obligations
Step 4 – 25% discount is allocated evenly across X, Y, Z
Total stand alone price = CU24mTotal transaction price = CU18mTotal discount = 25%Discount * stand-alone = CU6m
1• Observable price of good or service that is sold separately
2
• Estimate selling prices if not observable• Adjusted market assessment approach or expected cost plus margin
approach
3
• Residual approach…• Only when selling price is highly variable or uncertain (different to
current residual method)
Relative stand-alone selling price
PwC and ICPAU
Revenue recognition model – a simple example
9
Step 5 - Recognise revenue when (or as) a performance obligation is satisfied
Step 1 – Signed contract exists
Step 2 – Customer B can benefit from X, Y and Z separately as they are sold separately - three separate performance obligations
Step 3 – The transaction price is fixed at CU18m.
Step 4 – 25% discount is allocated evenly across X, Y, Z
Total stand alone price = CU24mTotal transaction price = CU18mTotal discount = 25%Discount * stand-alone = CU6m
Step 5 – CU6m each = recognise when control of X / Y transfers CU6m = recognise over the period that Z is provided
Customer receives benefits as performed/another entity would not need to re-perform
e.g. cleaning service, shipping
Create/enhance an asset customer controlse.g. house on customer’s land
Does not create asset w/alternative use AND
Right to payment for work to datee.g. ‘manufacturing service’
No
NoOve
r ti
me
Poin
t in tim
e
Yes
Yes
Yes No
PwC and ICPAU
Revenue recognition model – a simple example
10
If not over time, then point in time….
Recognise revenue when control transfers
Indicators that customer has obtained control of a good or service:
Right to payment for asset
Legal title to asset
Physical possession of asset
Customer has significant risk and rewards
Customer has accepted the asset
PwC and ICPAU
Revenue recognition model – a simple example
11
PwC and ICPAU
Exercise - Temperature test
12
Answer multiple choice questions in each scenario.
PwC and ICPAU
Exercise – Scenario 1
13
• Entity C sells land to Customer D. Customer D uses the land to construct a housing development.
• Customer D makes a non-refundable upfront payment of CU10,000 when legal title is transferred and CU990,000 in five years, which is when Customer D expects to have completed the development.
• Entity C has no history with this customer and the land is in an area currently not zoned for housing development. Thus, Entity C is not able to conclude that Customer D will pay more than the upfront payment.
• If Customer D fails to pay in five years, Entity C re-takes legal title to the land and any assets on the land.
Question
How much revenue is recognised when Entity C transfers legal title of the land?
A. Recognise revenue CU1,000,000 as the control of the land has been transferred. There is a long-term receivable of CU990,000.
B. Recognise revenue of CU10,000 as this is a non-refundable payment and control of the land has transferred to the customer.
C. Recognise no revenue as there is no contract with the customer due to the significant doubt about the customer’s ability and intention to pay.
PwC and ICPAU
Temperature test: Exercise DebriefStep 1: Identify the contract
14
Scenario 1
Entity C
• Initial payment: CU10,000• Deferred payment: CU990,000
How much revenue is recognised when Entity C transfers legal title of the land?
A. CU1,000,000, full contract amount
B. CU10,000, non-refundable amount
C. Nil, there is no contract with the customer
PwC and ICPAU
Temperature test: Exercise DebriefStep 1: Identify the contract
15
Contract
• Approved
• Rights of each party identified
• Payment terms identified
• Commercial substance
• Collectibility
What is the appropriate
treatment then?• Record deposit liabilities initially and continue to re-assess whether a contract with a customer is established subsequently
• Recognise revenue only if the consideration received is non-refundable and when:
o either there is no remaining obligations to transfer goods or services to the customer;
o or the contract has been terminated
Step 1 Collectibility criterion to determine if contract exists
PwC and ICPAU
Exercise – Scenario 2
16
• Entity E enters into a contract with Customer F to construct a brand new high-end power station. Control of the power station is expected to transfer at the end of five years.
• It is the first power station of this particular design and Entity E agreed to provide support to Customer F in connection with the general maintenance of the plant for the first year of operation free of charge.
• Entity E also provides similar maintenance services to other power stations.
Question
How many performance obligations exist in this agreement?
A. One. The maintenance service is not a distinct performance obligation. It is a marketing expense and costs should be expensed as incurred.
B. Two. The construction of the plant and maintenance represent two distinct performance obligations. They can be sold separately to the customer.
C. Many. Each component of the power station that can be sold separately (for example, the generator) is a distinct performance obligation.
PwC and ICPAU
Temperature test: Exercise DebriefStep 2: Identify the performance obligations
17
Scenario 2
Entity E Customer F
$
How many performance obligations exist in this agreement?
A. One
B. Two
C. Many
PwC and ICPAU
Temperature test: Exercise DebriefStep 2: Identify the performance obligations
18
Distinct Performance Obligations
Can the customer benefit from the goods or services transferred on their own?
Is the promise separately identifiable from other
promises?
Step 2Distinct considered from the perspective of the customer
PwC and ICPAU
Exercise – Scenario 3
19
• Assume the same facts as Scenario 2.
• The contract price is CU1,000,000 plus a 5% bonus if the plant meets specific operating thresholds in the first two years. Entity E projects a 50% chance that it will receive the bonus (50% that it will not receive a bonus).
• The plant is a new design and Entity E has limited historical evidence on the plant’s operations.
• Customer F finances the project by making a CU1,000,000 prepayment before construction begins. The lending rate between the customer and the entity is 10%.
Question
What is the transaction price?
A. CU1,000,000, the fixed contract sum
B. CU1,025,000, the fixed contract sum plus estimated bonus of CU25,000 (5% * 50% likelihood)
C. CU1,610,510, the fixed contract sum considering time value of money
D. CU1,635,500, the fixed contract sum plus estimated bonus of CU25,000 (5% * 50% likelihood) plus effect of time value of money (TVM on the contingent payment assumed immaterial)
PwC and ICPAU
Temperature test: Exercise DebriefStep 3: Calculate the transaction price
20
Scenario 3
ContractExpected construction
period................. 5 years
Full payment…… CU1 million
5% bonus based on operating target
……
What is the transaction price?
A. CU1,000,000
B. CU1,025,000
C. CU1,610,510
D. CU1,635,500
PwC and ICPAU
Temperature test: Exercise DebriefStep 3: Calculate the transaction price
21
Step 3New model for variable consideration and financing
IAS 11 / 18
IFRS 15
• Measured reliably?
• Sufficiently advanced that performance is probable to meet [IAS 11]?
• Highly probable?
• Not subject to significant reversal?
Variable consideration
IAS 11 / 18
IFRS 15
• Prepayment is non-financial liability
• Time value of money only considered for deferred payments
• Need to determine if significant financing component exists
Financing
PwC and ICPAU
Exercise – Scenario 4
22
• Entity G sells mobile phones, tablets and airtime plans to its customers.
• Entity G offers a new promotion package where customers can purchase a phone, subscribe for a 12-month airtime plan and receive a ‘free’ tablet for a total price of CU800.
• This reflects a 20% discount from the standalone selling prices of the items which are as follows:
Phone: CU300
Airtime: CU300
Tablet: CU400
Total: CU1,000
• The entity regularly offers bundled packages for the phone and a 12-month airtime plan for CU400.
Question
How should the transaction price of CU800 be allocated to the phone, airtime and tablet?
A. Phone: CU240, Airtime: CU240, Tablet: CU320, based on 20% discount applied proportionally to all three performance obligations
B. Phone: CU200, Airtime: CU200, Tablet: CU400, based on the entire discount being allocated to the phone and airtime because there is objective evidence that the discount relates to those two performance obligations
PwC and ICPAU
Temperature test: DebriefStep 4: Allocate the transaction price
23
Scenario 4
How should the transaction price of CU800 be allocated?
A. Phone: CU240, Airtime: CU240, Tablet: CU320
B. Phone: CU200, Airtime: CU200, Tablet: CU400
PhoneCU300
AirtimeCU300
Tablet CU400
CU1,000
20% Discount
CU800
PwC and ICPAU
Temperature test: Exercise DebriefStep 4: Allocate the transaction price
24
Step 4Based on relative stand-alone selling price but more guidance provided
PhoneCU300
AirtimeCU300
Tablet CU400
CU1,000
20% Discount
CU800
Phone and airtime regularly sold together for CU400
Phone/airtime CU400
Tablet CU400
PwC and ICPAU
Exercise – Scenario 5
25
• Entity H agrees to produce 10,000 car frames for Customer I for a transaction price of CU10,000,000.
• Entity H has the right to payment for work performed including a reasonable margin if Customer I cancels while production is partially completed.
• There is no alternative use for the frames as they reflect a particular car model designed by the customer.
Question
Entity H has completed 50% of the production and delivered 2,000 car frames to Customer I. How much revenue should Entity H recognise for the work performed to date?
A. CU2,000,000
B. CU5,000,000
PwC and ICPAU
Temperature test: Exercise DebriefStep 5: Recognise revenue
26
Scenario 5
Entity H Customer I
CU10 million
How much revenue should Entity H recognise for the work performed to date?
A. CU2,000,000
B. CU5,000,000
PwC and ICPAU
Temperature test: Exercise DebriefStep 5: Recognise revenue
27
IAS 18IFRS 15 Exclusive
Point in time
Over time
Step 5 Single model for all performance obligations criteria to determine over time
PwC and ICPAU
Temperature test: Exercise DebriefStep 5: Recognise revenue
28
Customer receive benefits as performed/another would not need to re-
perform
Create/enhance an asset customer controls
Does not create asset w/alternative use
ANDright to payment for work
to date
Good or service transfers over time if one of the following criteria met:
If criteria not met, transfers at a point in time based on following indicators
Right to payment for asset Legal title to asset
Physical possession of asset
Customer has significant risk and
rewards
Customer has accepted the asset
PwC
Deep dive: performance obligationsRecap: definition
29
Performance obligation if:
• Distinct good or service:
o customer benefits from good/service on its own or with other resources; and
o separable from other promises
• Series of goods/services, if consistent pattern of transfer to customer over time
PwC and ICPAU
Deep dive: performance obligationsIn practice
30
Individual distinct
good or service
Sold separately or
can be used separately
• Consumer goods• Simple installation• Mobile and service
Group of inseparable
goods or service
Dependent on or interrelated with other items in the
contract
• Construction contracts• Complex installations• Customised software
Series of homogeneous
‘services’
Consistent pattern of transfer over time
• Daily cleaning service• Ferry service• Call centre processing
PwC
Deep dive: material rightsCustomer options for additional goods or services
31
What are potential customer options?
• Customer loyalty programme
• Extended warranty options
• Renewal options, etc.
Material right?
If YES, then
Estimate the standalone selling price of the option and allocate a portion of the sale price to it
PwC and ICPAU
Deep dive: performance obligations - Exercise
32
Answer multiple choice and any follow-up questions in each scenario.
PwC and ICPAU
Exercise – Scenario 1
33
Entity T, a telecommunications company, offers the following 12-month bundled package:
• Broadband: broadband up to 25MB including a free router and free activation
• Mobile phone: a selected mobile phone plus 500 minutes per month
• TV: 10 designated entertainment channels with a free TV box
The functionalities of each product are as follows:
• Customers can use their own router. However, this would not result in any discount.
• Customers can use the handset with different service providers.
• The TV box can only be used to watch the designated channels offered by Entity T.
An engineer activates the broadband by enabling a live connection to the customer’s house.
Question
How many performance obligations are included in the bundled package offered by Entity T?
A. Five
B. Six
C. Seven
PwC and ICPAU
Deep dive: performance obligations – Debrief Bundled package
34
Scenario 1
To be DISTINCT – Criterion a) whether customers can benefit from particular goods or services upon transfer
Key judgment areas:
• Can the customer benefit from the product on its own?
• Activation – required special arrangements and potential integration?
1
5
4
3
2
How many performance obligations are included in the bundled package offered by Entity T?
A. Five
B. Six
C. Seven
PwC and ICPAU
Exercise – Scenario 2
35
Government G engaged with Entity J to build a high-security prison. Entity J is responsible for the overall management of the project, including prison design, site clearance, construction of foundations and structure, installation of CCTV and establishment of fences. There are competitors that offer similar services or sell similar goods.
Question
How many performance obligations does Entity J have in the contract with Government G?
A. One
B. Five
PwC and ICPAU
Deep dive: performance obligations – DebriefPrison design & constructions
36
Scenario 2
To be DISTINCT – Criterion b) whether the promises are separately identifiable to each othersHow about when Entity J only acts as a project coordinator and individual subcontractors are directly responsible to Government G? What is the potential implication?
• Principal v. agent
How many performance obligations does Entity J have in the contract with Government G?
A. One
B. Five
PwC and ICPAU
Deep dive: performance obligations – DebriefDistinct in the context of the contract
Factors that indicate good or service is separately identifiable include:
• entity does not provide a significant service of integrating the good or service with other goods or services into a bundle that represent the combined output
• good or service does not significantly modify or customise another good or servicepromised in the contract
• good or service is not highly dependent on, or highly interrelated with, other goods or services promised in the contract
Judgment required
37
PwC and ICPAU
Exercise – Scenario 3
38
• Entity K operates flights for passengers travelling between different cities in Country X. Other airlines offer similar routes.
• Entity K operates a customer loyalty programme whereby the customer can accumulate mileage for each trip using Entity K’s services.
• Customers can redeem one short trip for no further consideration after 10 short haul flights. The fair value of the points received per flight is not material.
Question
How should Entity K determine the accounting for this customer loyalty programme?
A. Entity K shall disregard the loyalty points earned by customers each time given it is not material individually.
B. Entity K shall separately account for the loyalty points and recognise related revenue only when a customer redeems the points and takes the free flight.
PwC and ICPAU
Deep dive: material rights – DebriefCustomer loyalty programme
39
Scenario 3
How should Entity K determine the accounting for this customer loyalty programme?
A. Entity K shall disregard the loyalty points earned by customer each time given it is not material individually.
B. Entity K shall separately account for the loyalty points and recognise related revenue only when a customer redeems the points and takes the free flight.
Loyalty points
10 times =
PwC and ICPAU
Deep dive: material rights – DebriefCustomer loyalty programme
• Material rights existed – consideration of whole arrangement
• Accounting implication
Dr. Trade receivables <B/S> xx
Cr. Revenue <P/L> (xx)
Cr. Deferred revenue <B/S> (xx)
• Other complexities?
40
PwC
Recap
What do customers buy?
Material rights?
Separable from other goods /
services?
What benefits do customers obtain from
goods / services transferred?
41
Similar in nature and recognition
pattern?
PwC
More challenges are coming…
42
Uh oh….this is not going to be
easy…
Questions?
This publication has been prepared for general guidance on matters of interest only, and does not constitute professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication, and, to the extent permitted by law, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, its members, employees and agents do not accept or assume any liability, responsibility or duty of care for any consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it.