ifc-bridge bridge types covered & use cases · otherwise the data model might fail to fulfill...

36
bSI IFC-Bridge IFC-BRIDGE BRIDGE TYPES COVERED & USE CASES IFC-Bridge Project Team

Upload: others

Post on 19-Sep-2019

12 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: IFC-BRIDGE BRIDGE TYPES COVERED & USE CASES · otherwise the data model might fail to fulfill the requirements coming from these uses cases consensus must be found regarding the use

bSI IFC-Bridge

IFC-BRIDGE

BRIDGE TYPES COVERED & USE CASES

IFC-Bridge Project Team

Page 2: IFC-BRIDGE BRIDGE TYPES COVERED & USE CASES · otherwise the data model might fail to fulfill the requirements coming from these uses cases consensus must be found regarding the use

bSI IFC-Bridge

WP1: Requirements analysis

Objectives

WP 1.2

analyze the requirements of existing data exchange processes in bridge projects

Capture and document user scenarios and use cases for the fast track option,

focus on the use cases already covered by the contributing projects

WP 1.3

Document in detail the purpose and intended use of the fast track IfcBridge data

standard to manage user expectations,

WP 1.4

Prepare these documentations for reviews and manage the reviews with the appointed

international expert panel

Page 3: IFC-BRIDGE BRIDGE TYPES COVERED & USE CASES · otherwise the data model might fail to fulfill the requirements coming from these uses cases consensus must be found regarding the use

bSI IFC-Bridge

WP1: Bridge Type Coverage

Page 4: IFC-BRIDGE BRIDGE TYPES COVERED & USE CASES · otherwise the data model might fail to fulfill the requirements coming from these uses cases consensus must be found regarding the use

bSI IFC-Bridge

WP1: BRIDGE TYPE COVERAGE

Frame Bridge

© CRBIM

no bearings

Page 5: IFC-BRIDGE BRIDGE TYPES COVERED & USE CASES · otherwise the data model might fail to fulfill the requirements coming from these uses cases consensus must be found regarding the use

bSI IFC-Bridge

WP1: BRIDGE TYPE COVERAGE

Rigid Frame Bridge

Page 6: IFC-BRIDGE BRIDGE TYPES COVERED & USE CASES · otherwise the data model might fail to fulfill the requirements coming from these uses cases consensus must be found regarding the use

bSI IFC-Bridge

WP1: BRIDGE TYPE COVERAGE

Rigid Frame Bridge

Page 7: IFC-BRIDGE BRIDGE TYPES COVERED & USE CASES · otherwise the data model might fail to fulfill the requirements coming from these uses cases consensus must be found regarding the use

bSI IFC-Bridge

WP1: BRIDGE TYPE COVERAGE

Culvert

Page 8: IFC-BRIDGE BRIDGE TYPES COVERED & USE CASES · otherwise the data model might fail to fulfill the requirements coming from these uses cases consensus must be found regarding the use

bSI IFC-Bridge

WP1: Bridge Type Coverage

Construction Type Covered

Beam bridges

Slab-girder bridges

Box-girder bridges

Superstructure Geometry

Straight

Haunched

In curve

Page 9: IFC-BRIDGE BRIDGE TYPES COVERED & USE CASES · otherwise the data model might fail to fulfill the requirements coming from these uses cases consensus must be found regarding the use

bSI IFC-Bridge

WP1: Bridge Type Coverage

Material

Reinforced Concrete bridges

Prestressed Concrete bridges

Steel/Concrete Composite bridges

Steel girder bridges

Steel bridges

Page 10: IFC-BRIDGE BRIDGE TYPES COVERED & USE CASES · otherwise the data model might fail to fulfill the requirements coming from these uses cases consensus must be found regarding the use

bSI IFC-Bridge

WP1: Bridge Type Coverage

© TUM-CMS

Material

Composite Materials

Page 11: IFC-BRIDGE BRIDGE TYPES COVERED & USE CASES · otherwise the data model might fail to fulfill the requirements coming from these uses cases consensus must be found regarding the use

bSI IFC-Bridge

WP1: Requirements analysis

it is very important to first define the

exchange scenarios / uses cases

of the IFC extensions to be developed

otherwise the data model might fail to fulfill

the requirements coming from these uses cases

consensus must be found regarding the use cases

to be supported

use case identification was based on the results of

the IFC-Infra Overall Architecture project

Use cases

Page 12: IFC-BRIDGE BRIDGE TYPES COVERED & USE CASES · otherwise the data model might fail to fulfill the requirements coming from these uses cases consensus must be found regarding the use

bSI IFC-Bridge

WP1: Requirements analysis

Page 13: IFC-BRIDGE BRIDGE TYPES COVERED & USE CASES · otherwise the data model might fail to fulfill the requirements coming from these uses cases consensus must be found regarding the use

bSI IFC-Bridge

WP1: Requirements analysis

Page 14: IFC-BRIDGE BRIDGE TYPES COVERED & USE CASES · otherwise the data model might fail to fulfill the requirements coming from these uses cases consensus must be found regarding the use

bSI IFC-Bridge

WP1: Requirements analysis

Page 15: IFC-BRIDGE BRIDGE TYPES COVERED & USE CASES · otherwise the data model might fail to fulfill the requirements coming from these uses cases consensus must be found regarding the use

bSI IFC-Bridge

WP1: Requirements analysis

Page 16: IFC-BRIDGE BRIDGE TYPES COVERED & USE CASES · otherwise the data model might fail to fulfill the requirements coming from these uses cases consensus must be found regarding the use

bSI IFC-Bridge

WP1: Requirements analysis

Page 17: IFC-BRIDGE BRIDGE TYPES COVERED & USE CASES · otherwise the data model might fail to fulfill the requirements coming from these uses cases consensus must be found regarding the use

bSI IFC-Bridge

WP1: Requirements analysis

IFC-Bridge: Use case dependencies

Page 18: IFC-BRIDGE BRIDGE TYPES COVERED & USE CASES · otherwise the data model might fail to fulfill the requirements coming from these uses cases consensus must be found regarding the use

bSI IFC-Bridge

WP1: Requirements analysis

initial data (terrain, soil, existing structures etc.)

from various GIS (and other sources)

are brought into BIM space

and can then be exchanged using IFC

IFC exchange scenario:

Data source to

Bridge Modeling application

Geometry representation:

Tesselated BRep

Use case 1: Initial State Modeling

covered

Page 19: IFC-BRIDGE BRIDGE TYPES COVERED & USE CASES · otherwise the data model might fail to fulfill the requirements coming from these uses cases consensus must be found regarding the use

bSI IFC-Bridge

WP1: Requirements analysis

Alignment and major road

parameters are imported from the

roadway/railway design system

IFC exchange scenario:

Roadway/railway design system

to

Bridge Modeling application

Geometry representation:

Alignment + Parameters

(+ line strings)

Use case 2: Import of Alignment and major Road/Railway parameters

covered

Page 20: IFC-BRIDGE BRIDGE TYPES COVERED & USE CASES · otherwise the data model might fail to fulfill the requirements coming from these uses cases consensus must be found regarding the use

bSI IFC-Bridge

WP1: Requirements analysis

3D technical visualization of the infrastructure project

for communication of design solutions to third parties including the public

IFC exchange scenario:

Design application to Visualization application

Geometry representation:

Tesselated BRep

Use case 3: Technical Visualization

© TUM-CMS

covered

Page 21: IFC-BRIDGE BRIDGE TYPES COVERED & USE CASES · otherwise the data model might fail to fulfill the requirements coming from these uses cases consensus must be found regarding the use

bSI IFC-Bridge

WP1: Requirements analysis

Coordination of different sub-models created by domain experts

detection of interferences (clashes)

IFC exchange scenario:

Design application to Coordination application

Design application to Design application (Reference Model)

Geometry representation:

Tesselated BRep

Use case 4: Coordination / Collision Detection

covered

Page 22: IFC-BRIDGE BRIDGE TYPES COVERED & USE CASES · otherwise the data model might fail to fulfill the requirements coming from these uses cases consensus must be found regarding the use

bSI IFC-Bridge

WP1: Requirements analysis

4D technical visualisation of the construction phases

allows verification of the construction schedule and its communication with

third parties including the public

IFC exchange scenario:

Design application to scheduling application

Geometry representation:

Tesselated BRep (+ Time)

Use case 5: Construction Sequence Modeling (4D modeling)

covered

Page 23: IFC-BRIDGE BRIDGE TYPES COVERED & USE CASES · otherwise the data model might fail to fulfill the requirements coming from these uses cases consensus must be found regarding the use

bSI IFC-Bridge

WP1: Requirements analysis

determine quantities (volumes and surfaces) from the model (bill of quantities)

basis for cost estimation

IFC exchange scenario:

Design application to QTO application

Geometry representation:

Tesselated Brep

Use case 6: Quantity Take-Off

RIB iTwo

covered

Page 24: IFC-BRIDGE BRIDGE TYPES COVERED & USE CASES · otherwise the data model might fail to fulfill the requirements coming from these uses cases consensus must be found regarding the use

bSI IFC-Bridge

WP1: Requirements analysis

Transfer information about the progress of the construction project

IFC exchange scenario:

Progress capture application to visualisation application

Geometry representation:

Tesselated BRep

Use case 7: Progress Monitoring

covered

Page 25: IFC-BRIDGE BRIDGE TYPES COVERED & USE CASES · otherwise the data model might fail to fulfill the requirements coming from these uses cases consensus must be found regarding the use

bSI IFC-Bridge

WP1: Requirements analysis

Compare the built structure against the as-planned model

IFC exchange scenario:

Surveying application to visualisation application

Geometry representation:

Point clouds / Tesselated BRep

Use case 8: As-built vs. As-planned Comparisons

covered

Page 26: IFC-BRIDGE BRIDGE TYPES COVERED & USE CASES · otherwise the data model might fail to fulfill the requirements coming from these uses cases consensus must be found regarding the use

bSI IFC-Bridge

WP1: Requirements analysis

Support operation and maintenance of the infrastructure asset, including

inspection, damage detection, condition rating, condition prediction,

maintenance planning

IFC exchange scenario:

Design application to maintenance application

Geometry representation:

Tesselated BRep

Use case 9: Handover to Asset Management

www.cras.ca

covered

Page 27: IFC-BRIDGE BRIDGE TYPES COVERED & USE CASES · otherwise the data model might fail to fulfill the requirements coming from these uses cases consensus must be found regarding the use

bSI IFC-Bridge

WP1: Requirements analysis

Feed final design information back into a GIS

system for network analysis etc.

IFC exchange scenario:

Design application from/to GIS application

Geometry representation:

Explicit BRep

Use case 10: Handover to GIS for spatial analysis

covered

Page 28: IFC-BRIDGE BRIDGE TYPES COVERED & USE CASES · otherwise the data model might fail to fulfill the requirements coming from these uses cases consensus must be found regarding the use

bSI IFC-Bridge

WP1: Requirements analysis

exchange reference model for further design activities

limited manipulation of the model

IFC exchange scenario:

Design application to Design application

Geometry representation:

Boundary representation, Limited procedrual geometry (Reference

View)

Use case 11: Design-to-Design (reference model)

covered

Page 29: IFC-BRIDGE BRIDGE TYPES COVERED & USE CASES · otherwise the data model might fail to fulfill the requirements coming from these uses cases consensus must be found regarding the use

bSI IFC-Bridge

WP1: Requirements analysis

exchange of fully parametric description of bridge

between two distinct design applications

allows manipulation of the alignment, profiles etc. by receiving application

IFC exchange scenario:

Design application to Design application

Geometry representation:

Fully parametric description

Use case 12: Design-to-Design (full model logic)

not-covered

Page 30: IFC-BRIDGE BRIDGE TYPES COVERED & USE CASES · otherwise the data model might fail to fulfill the requirements coming from these uses cases consensus must be found regarding the use

bSI IFC-Bridge

WP1: Requirements analysis

1

2

3

Use case 13: Design-to-Construction

Page 31: IFC-BRIDGE BRIDGE TYPES COVERED & USE CASES · otherwise the data model might fail to fulfill the requirements coming from these uses cases consensus must be found regarding the use

bSI IFC-Bridge

WP1: Requirements analysis

Structural analysis of bridges, tunnels, retaining walls

IFC exchange scenario:

Design application to Structural analysis application

Geometry representation:

Implicit description based on

profiles and alignments

(and/or analytical model)

Use case 14: Structural Analysis

not-covered

Page 32: IFC-BRIDGE BRIDGE TYPES COVERED & USE CASES · otherwise the data model might fail to fulfill the requirements coming from these uses cases consensus must be found regarding the use

bSI IFC-Bridge

WP1: Requirements analysis

check design of bridge for compliance

with local codes and regulations

IFC exchange scenario:

Design application to Checking application

Geometry representation:

Implicit description based on profiles and alignments

Use case 15: Code Compliance Checking

not-covered

Page 33: IFC-BRIDGE BRIDGE TYPES COVERED & USE CASES · otherwise the data model might fail to fulfill the requirements coming from these uses cases consensus must be found regarding the use

bSI IFC-Bridge

WP1: Requirements analysis

derive technical drawings from the model that fulfil the (national) drawings

regulations

IFC exchange scenario:

3D Design application

to Submission

Geometry representation:

Tesselated BRep

+ Drawing information

Use case 16: Drawing Generation

not-covered

Page 34: IFC-BRIDGE BRIDGE TYPES COVERED & USE CASES · otherwise the data model might fail to fulfill the requirements coming from these uses cases consensus must be found regarding the use

bSI IFC-Bridge

WP1: Requirements analysis

Usage of model information for control / steering of machines (CNC etc)

IFC exchange scenario:

Design application to machines

Geometry representation:

Implicit description based on profiles and alignments

Use case 17: Prefabrication and manufacturing

not-covered

Page 35: IFC-BRIDGE BRIDGE TYPES COVERED & USE CASES · otherwise the data model might fail to fulfill the requirements coming from these uses cases consensus must be found regarding the use

bSI IFC-Bridge

IFC-Bridge Views

Bridge Reference View (based on IFC4 Reference View)

Faceted Brep + Profile Sweeps

Bridge Alignment-based Reference View (based on IFC4 Reference

View)

Alignment

Faceted Brep + Profile Sweeps

Bridge Design Transfer View (based on IFC4 Design Transfer View)

alignment

Faceted Brep + Profiles Sweeps + CSG

Bridge Asset Management View

alignment ?

Page 36: IFC-BRIDGE BRIDGE TYPES COVERED & USE CASES · otherwise the data model might fail to fulfill the requirements coming from these uses cases consensus must be found regarding the use

bSI IFC-Bridge

http://www.buildingsmart-tech.org/specifications/ifc-view-definition/ifc4-reference-view/comparison-rv-dtv

IFC4 RV Bridge RV Bridge ARV IFC 4 DTV Bridge DTV

IfcSolidModel x x x x x

IfcCsgSolid x x

IfcManifoldSolidBrep x x

IfcAdvancedBRep x x

IfcAdvancedBRepWithVoids

IfcFacetedBrep x x

IfcFacetedBrepWithVoids

IfcSweptAreaSolid x x x x x

IfcExtrudedAraSolid x x x x x

IfcExtrudedAreaSolidTapered x x

IfcFixedReferenceSweptAreaSolid x x

IfcRevolvedAreaSolid x x x x x

IfcRevolvedAreaSolidTapered x x

IfcCurveSweptAreaSolid x x

IfcSweptDiskSolid x x x x x

IfcSweptDiskSolidPolygonal

IfcSectionedSolid x x

IfcSectionedSolidHorizontal x x

IfcTesselatedItem x x x x x

IfcTesselatedFaceSet x x x x x

IfcTriangulatedFaceSet x x x x x

IfcPositioningElement x x x x

IfcAlignment x x

IfcAlignment2DHorizontal x x

IfcAlignment2DVertical x x

IfcAlignment2DSegment x x

IfcAlignment2DVerticalSegment x x

IfcAlignment2DHorizonalSegment x x