ieee- p2600 pp validation suggested process and update

5
IEEE- P2600 IEEE- P2600 PP Validation PP Validation Suggested Process and Suggested Process and Update Update Members: Ron Nevo, Brian Smithson , Alan Sukert, Lee Farrell, Nancy Chen, Carmen Aubry, Peter Cybuck June 2008

Upload: allen-perez

Post on 31-Dec-2015

29 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

IEEE- P2600 PP Validation Suggested Process and Update. Members: Ron Nevo, Brian Smithson , Alan Sukert, Lee Farrell, Nancy Chen, Carmen Aubry, Peter Cybuck June 2008. Lexmark -Yes HP- Yes Canon- Yes Ricoh- Yes Sharp- Yes Konica Minolta- Yes Toshiba- Yes OKI-Yes Oce-Yes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: IEEE- P2600 PP Validation  Suggested Process and Update

IEEE- P2600IEEE- P2600PP Validation PP Validation

Suggested Process and Suggested Process and UpdateUpdate

Members: Ron Nevo,

Brian Smithson , Alan Sukert, Lee Farrell, Nancy Chen, Carmen Aubry, Peter Cybuck June 2008

Page 2: IEEE- P2600 PP Validation  Suggested Process and Update

◦ Lexmark -Yes◦ HP- Yes◦ Canon- Yes◦ Ricoh- Yes◦ Sharp- Yes◦ Konica Minolta- Yes ◦ Toshiba- Yes◦ OKI-Yes◦ Oce-Yes◦ Kyocera-Yes◦ Xerox- Yes◦ Fuji-Xerox – Yes◦ InfoPrint- Yes◦ Samsung - Yes◦ Total 14 companies

Who are the SponsorsWho are the Sponsors

Page 3: IEEE- P2600 PP Validation  Suggested Process and Update

IPA Update IPA Update (From Sharp members)(From Sharp members)

IPA policy is to accept any PP that was validated by the CC scheme and was recognized by CCRA since Japan is a member of CCRA.

- So, if the P2600 PP is evaluated by Atsec, validated by NIAP and recognized by CCRA, IPA will accept it.

- However, when a vendor submits the ST that claims conformance to the P2600 PP, the evaluation body will evaluate it and IPA will validate it with the interpretation that, they believe respectively, conforms to the CC language. (in App Notes and in Guide)

The biggest concern is that the interpretation is different from the one that Atsec, NIAP, (or IEEE P2600 WG member) believe. (in App Notes and in Guide)◦ For example, according to IPA, the P2600 PP still specifies some

HCD functions, so TOE shall be an MFP with full function. Any other Updates? Canon ? Ricoh?

Page 4: IEEE- P2600 PP Validation  Suggested Process and Update

Process past activitiesProcess past activities Sponsors Process start 8/2007 We have 14 sponsor companies-2-4/2008 Decision to go with Atsec 2/5/2008 - Atsec provided S.O.W to IEEE by 2/29/08 Formal discussions with NIAP on 3/2/08 – IEEE provided Contract - 4/1/08 Start formal evaluation (with family of P.Ps) 4/14/2008 P2600 Backgrounder- finished 4/20/08- IEEE- Press release -selecting Atsec 4/29/2008 New style of PP (Packages/options) (based on Atsec review)

5/2008

Page 5: IEEE- P2600 PP Validation  Suggested Process and Update

Process new activitiesProcess new activities Do we may need to buy the PP rights from IEEE ?? Are we submitting production PP ? IEEE P.R – Release of Standard 8/2008 ???TBD Complete PP- (Packages) by 8/29/2008 Submit PP-A to NIAP (for review) –US Scheme 9/2008 Submit PP-A,B,C,D to German Scheme 9/2008 (for review) Review two scheme comments and implement them if we can by.

10/2008 Formal submit of PPs to US scheme and to Germen scheme (BSI)

11/2008 Final comments from two schemes 12/2008 IEEE P.R – PPs were approved by US and Germen schemes

1/2009? IEEE P.R release of PPs 3/2009?