identification of michigan fishes using cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. in white perch and...

64
Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithra Miscellaneous Publication 2010-02

Upload: others

Post on 21-Jan-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithra

Miscellaneous Publication 2010-02

Page 2: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

The Great Lakes Fishery Commission was established by the Convention on Great Lakes Fisheries between Canada and the United States, which was ratified on October 11, 1955. It was organized in April 1956 and assumed its duties as set forth in the Convention on July 1, 1956. The Commission has two major responsibilities: first, develop coordinated programs of research in the Great Lakes, and, on the basis of the findings, recommend measures which will permit the maximum sustained productivity of stocks of fish of common concern; second, formulate and implement a program to eradicate or minimize sea lamprey populations in the Great Lakes.

The Commission is also required to publish or authorize the publication of scientific or other information obtained in the performance of its duties. In fulfillment of this requirement the Commission publishes the Technical Report Series, intended for peer-reviewed scientific literature; Special Publications, designed primarily for dissemination of reports produced by working committees of the Commission; and other (non-serial) publications. Technical Reports are most suitable for either interdisciplinary review and synthesis papers of general interest to Great Lakes fisheries researchers, managers, and administrators, or more narrowly focused material with special relevance to a single but important aspect of the Commission's program. Special Publications, being working documents, may evolve with the findings of and charges to a particular committee. Both publications follow the style of the Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. Sponsorship of Technical Reports or Special Publications does not necessarily imply that the findings or conclusions contained therein are endorsed by the Commission.

COMMISSIONERS

Canada United States Peter Wallace, Michael J. Hansen, Chair

Robert G. Lambe, Vice-Chair William James Robert Hecky William W. Taylor

Wendy Watson-Wright David A. Ullrich Thomas Strickland

May 2010

Page 3: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithra

Daniel Traynor, Ashley Moerke, Roger Greil

Citation: Traynor, D., Moerke, A., and Greil, R. 2010. Identification of Michigan fishes using cleithra. Great Lakes Fish. Comm. Misc. Publ. 2010-02.

Great Lakes Fishery Commission 2100 Commonwealth Blvd., Suite 100

Ann Arbor, MI 48105-1563

May 2010

ISSN: 1090-106x (print) 1553-8087 (online)

D. Traynor.1 Michigan Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Marquette Fisheries Research Station, 484 Cherry Creek Road, Marquette, MI 49855, USA. A. Moerke and R. Greil. Lake Superior State University, Aquatic Research Laboratory, 650 West Easterday Avenue, Sault Sainte Marie, MI 49783, USA. 1Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).

Page 4: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Printed on recycled paper. Miscellaneous Publication 2010-02

Page 5: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

TABLE OF CONTENTS

About the Guide ........................................................................................................................................1 Introduction...............................................................................................................................................2 Cleithrum Morphology.............................................................................................................................3 Key by General Shape ..............................................................................................................................4 Identification by Family ...........................................................................................................................5 Centrarchidae .................................................................................................................................5 Moronidae......................................................................................................................................8 Sciaenidae ......................................................................................................................................9 Percopsidae ..................................................................................................................................10 Fundulidae ...................................................................................................................................10 Percidae........................................................................................................................................11 Atherinidae...................................................................................................................................15 Cottidae........................................................................................................................................16 Gobiidae.......................................................................................................................................17 Gasterosteidae..............................................................................................................................18 Cyprinidae....................................................................................................................................19 Coregoninae .................................................................................................................................29 Salmoninae...................................................................................................................................32 Umbridae .....................................................................................................................................37 Osmeridae ....................................................................................................................................37 Esocidae .......................................................................................................................................38 Gadidae ........................................................................................................................................39 Amiidae........................................................................................................................................39 Lepisosteidae ...............................................................................................................................40 Clupeidae .....................................................................................................................................41 Ictaluridae ....................................................................................................................................42 Catostomidae ...............................................................................................................................43 Comparison of Similar Species ..............................................................................................................47 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................................54 References ................................................................................................................................................54 Identification by Common Name Alewife (Alosa pseudoharengus).............................................................................................................41 Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) .................................................................................................................36 Black crappie (Pomoxis nigromaculatus) ...................................................................................................7 Blacknose shiner (Notropis heterolepis)...................................................................................................26 Blackside darter (Percina maculata) ........................................................................................................13 Bloater (Coregonus hoyi)..........................................................................................................................30 Bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus) .................................................................................................................5 Bluntnose minnow (Pimephales notatus) .................................................................................................24 Bowfin (Amia calva)................................................................................................................................ 39

Page 6: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Brassy minnow (Hybognathus hankinsoni) ............................................................................................. 29 Brook silverside (Labidesthes sicculus)................................................................................................... 15 Brook stickleback (Culaea inconstans) ................................................................................................... 18 Brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) ........................................................................................................... 33 Brown bullhead (Ameiurus nebulosus) .................................................................................................... 42 Brown trout (Salmo trutta)....................................................................................................................... 36 Burbot (Lota lota) .................................................................................................................................... 39 Central mudminnow (Umbra limi) .......................................................................................................... 37 Channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) ...................................................................................................... 42 Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha)........................................................................................ 35 Cisco (Coregonus artedi)......................................................................................................................... 31 Coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) ..................................................................................................... 35 Common carp (Cyprinus carpio) ..............................................................................................................27 Common shiner (Luxilus cornutus)...........................................................................................................21 Creek chub (Semotilus atromaculatus) .....................................................................................................20 Deepwater sculpin (Myoxocephalus thompsonii) .....................................................................................17 Emerald shiner (Notropis atherinoides)....................................................................................................23 Fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas)..................................................................................................19 Finescale dace (Phoxinus neogaeus).........................................................................................................25 Freshwater drum (Aplodinotus grunniens) .................................................................................................9 Gizzard shad (Dorosoma cepedianum).....................................................................................................41 Golden redhorse (Moxostoma erythrurum)...............................................................................................45 Golden shiner (Notemigonus crysoleucas) ...............................................................................................24 Goldfish (Carassius auritus).....................................................................................................................27 Hornyhead chub (Nocomis biguttatus) .....................................................................................................20 Iowa darter (Etheostoma exile) .................................................................................................................14 Johnny darter (Etheostoma nigrum)..........................................................................................................14 Kiyi (Coregonus kiyi) ...............................................................................................................................30 Lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) ...........................................................................................................33 Lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis)................................................................................................31 Largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides).................................................................................................6 Longnose dace (Rhinichthys cataractae) ..................................................................................................28 Longnose gar (Lepisosteus osseus) ...........................................................................................................40 Longnose sucker (Catostomus Catostomus) .............................................................................................44 Mimic shiner (Notropis volucellus) ..........................................................................................................22 Mottled sculpin (Cottus bairdii) ...............................................................................................................16 Muskellunge (Esox masquinongy) ............................................................................................................38 Ninespine stickleback (Pungitius pungitius).............................................................................................19 Northern hog sucker (Hypentelium nigricans)..........................................................................................44 Northern logperch (Percina caprodes semifasciata) ................................................................................15 Northern pearl dace (Margariscus nachtriebi) .........................................................................................26 Northern pike (Esox lucius) ......................................................................................................................38 Northern redbelly dace (Phoxinus eos) .....................................................................................................25

Page 7: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Pumpkinseed (Lepomis gibbosus)...............................................................................................................5 Quillback (Carpiodes cyprinus)................................................................................................................46 Rainbow smelt (Osmerus mordax) ...........................................................................................................37 Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) .....................................................................................................34 Redside dace (Clinostomus elongatus) .....................................................................................................21 Rock bass (Ambloplites rupestris) ..............................................................................................................7 Round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) ..................................................................................................17 Round whitefish (Prosopium cylindraceum) ............................................................................................32 Ruffe (Gymnocephalus cernuus) ..............................................................................................................12 Sand shiner (Notropis stramineus)............................................................................................................22 Shorthead redhorse (Moxostoma macrolepidotum) ..................................................................................45 Shortjaw cisco (Coregonus zenithicus).....................................................................................................29 Silver redhorse (Moxostoma anisurum) ....................................................................................................43 Slimy sculpin (Cottus cognatus) ...............................................................................................................16 Smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu) ..................................................................................................6 Splake (Salvelinus fontinalis x S. namaycush)..........................................................................................32 Spottail shiner (Notropis hudsonius).........................................................................................................23 Spotted gar (Lepisosteus oculatus) ...........................................................................................................40 Spotted sucker (Minytrema melanops) .....................................................................................................46 Striped fantail darter (Etheostoma flabellare lineolatum) ........................................................................13 Threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) .....................................................................................18 Troutperch (Percopsis omiscomaycus) .....................................................................................................10 Walleye (Sander vitreus) ..........................................................................................................................11 Western banded killifish (Fundulus diaphanus menona) .........................................................................10 Western blacknose dace (Rhinichthys obtusus) ........................................................................................28 White bass (Morone chrysops) ...................................................................................................................9 White perch (Morone americana)...............................................................................................................8 White sucker (Catostomus commersonii) .................................................................................................43 Yellow perch (Perca flavescens) ..............................................................................................................12

Page 8: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change
Page 9: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

AB

OU

T T

HE

GU

IDE

Whi

le w

orki

ng o

n a

corm

oran

t die

t stu

dy, w

e w

ere

surp

rised

to fi

nd th

at v

ery

little

pub

lishe

d in

form

atio

n ex

ists

on

met

hods

for a

naly

zing

the

diet

of

pis

civo

rous

ani

mal

s an

d ev

en le

ss p

ublis

hed

info

rmat

ion

on te

chni

ques

for

iden

tifyi

ng th

e bo

ny s

truct

ures

of

fish.

The

maj

ority

of

past

die

t st

udie

s ha

ve re

lied

on re

fere

nce

colle

ctio

ns o

f bon

es to

aid

in th

e id

entif

icat

ion

of p

artia

lly d

iges

ted

prey

item

s. Th

roug

hout

our

stu

dy, w

e fo

und

that

cle

ithra

are

the

mos

t us

eful

and

eas

ily i

dent

ified

bon

y st

ruct

ures

for

fis

h id

entif

icat

ion

and

wer

e al

so t

he m

ost

resi

stan

tto

dig

estio

n in

co

rmor

ant s

tom

achs

. Few

pub

licat

ions

hav

e ex

plai

ned

the

usef

ulne

ss o

f cle

ithra

as

diag

nost

ic b

ones

whi

le p

rovi

ding

illu

stra

tions

of re

pres

enta

tive

spec

ies.

To d

ate,

Han

sel e

t al.

(198

8) p

rovi

de t

he m

ost

exte

nsiv

e an

d us

eful

inf

orm

atio

n on

cle

ithru

mid

entif

icat

ion

and

mor

phol

ogy,

but

it

is

limite

d to

24

wes

tern

fish

spe

cies

. We

have

not

yet

bee

n ab

le to

find

any

publ

ishe

d in

form

atio

n on

cle

ithra

for s

peci

es in

the

Gre

at L

akes

regi

on,

desp

ite th

e in

tere

st fr

om m

anag

emen

t age

ncie

s.

Whe

n w

e re

ceiv

ed tr

aini

ng fo

r die

t ana

lysi

s an

d bo

ny s

truct

ure

iden

tific

atio

n fr

om M

ike

Bur

and

Bill

Edw

ards

(U.S

. Geo

logi

cal S

urve

y (U

SGS)

, La

ke E

rie B

iolo

gica

l St

atio

n) w

e w

ere

prov

ided

with

an

unpu

blis

hed

clei

thru

mid

entif

icat

ion

guid

e (J

. Jo

nes,

unpu

blis

hed

data

). Th

e gu

ide

cont

aine

d m

ore

than

30

fish

spec

ies

com

mon

to th

e G

reat

Lak

es a

nd p

rove

d to

be

an in

valu

able

tool

for c

orm

oran

t die

t ana

lysi

s. Th

roug

hout

the

proj

ect,

we

built

our

ow

n re

fere

nce

colle

ctio

n of

cle

ithra

and

exp

ande

d th

e nu

mbe

r of

spe

cies

not

pre

viou

sly

incl

uded

in th

e U

SGS

guid

e. T

his

publ

icat

ion

refle

cts

our

curr

ent p

rogr

ess

and

cont

ains

app

roxi

mat

ely

80 s

peci

es o

f fis

h fo

und

in M

ichi

gan

wat

ers.

We

belie

ve th

is g

uide

will

aid

fis

herie

s m

anag

ers

in im

prov

ed id

entif

icat

ion

and

quan

tific

atio

nof

pre

y ite

ms,

as w

ell a

s en

hanc

ed k

now

ledg

e of

fee

ding

hab

its a

nd f

ood-

web

in

tera

ctio

ns o

f aqu

atic

org

anis

ms.

We

cont

inue

to e

xpan

d ou

r ref

eren

ce c

olle

ctio

n an

d ex

pect

that

this

gui

de m

ay b

e a

prec

urso

r to

a m

ore

com

plet

e cl

eith

rum

iden

tific

atio

n gu

ide

for f

ish

thro

ugho

ut th

e G

reat

Lak

es re

gion

.

This

gui

de b

egin

s w

ith a

key

to c

leith

ra b

y ge

nera

l sha

pe, w

hich

will

lead

the

user

to th

e fa

mily

or g

roup

of f

amili

es f

or f

urth

er id

entif

icat

ion

to

spec

ies.

Late

ral

view

s (L

V)

of c

leith

ra a

re p

rese

nted

for

mos

t sp

ecie

s as

the

y ar

e ty

pica

lly d

iagn

ostic

, bu

t, fo

r so

me

spec

ies,

mos

tly w

ithin

C

yprin

idae

, a d

orsa

l vie

w (

DV

) of

the

clei

thru

m is

als

o pr

esen

ted

to a

id i

n id

entif

icat

ion.

Cau

tion

shou

ld b

e us

ed w

hen

iden

tifyi

ng s

peci

men

s w

ithin

a fa

mily

who

se re

spec

tive

mem

bers

are

not

all

pres

ente

d in

this

gui

de (e

.g.,

the

fam

ily Ic

talu

ridae

). B

row

n bu

llhea

d (A

mei

urus

nebu

losu

s)cl

eith

raar

e sh

own

in th

is g

uide

, but

yel

low

bul

lhea

d (I

ctal

urus

nat

alis

) and

bla

ck b

ullh

ead

(Am

eiur

usm

elas

)are

not

, so

care

shou

ld b

e ta

ken

whe

n sa

mpl

es a

re c

olle

cted

whe

re th

e sp

ecie

s’ra

nges

ove

rlap.

How

ever

, one

of

the

bene

fits

of u

sing

cle

ithra

for

fis

h id

entif

icat

ion

is th

at, e

ven

if a

clei

thru

m c

anno

t be

iden

tifie

d to

the

spec

ies

leve

l, it

can

ofte

n be

iden

tifie

d to

fam

ily o

r gen

us. M

ost s

peci

es’c

leith

rum

shap

e do

es n

ot v

ary,

but

a

few

spe

cies

(e.g

., w

hite

per

ch (M

oron

e am

eric

ana)

, wal

leye

, (Sa

nder

vitr

eus)

, and

nor

ther

n pe

arl d

ace

(Mar

gari

scus

nach

trie

bi)

do e

xhib

it so

me

varia

tion

in c

leith

rum

shap

e. I

n w

hite

per

ch a

nd w

alle

ye, c

leith

rum

chan

ges

appe

ar to

occ

ur a

s fis

h gr

ow la

rger

, with

the

prim

ary

chan

ge b

eing

gr

owth

of s

erra

tions

on

the

dors

opos

terio

rlob

e.

Whe

n us

ing

clei

thra

as a

tool

for i

dent

ifyin

g pa

rtial

ly d

iges

ted

fish,

it is

impo

rtant

to c

onsi

der t

hat s

ome

eros

ion

of th

e cl

eith

ra m

ay h

ave

occu

rred

, m

akin

g th

em m

ore

diff

icul

t to

iden

tify.

Cle

ithra

are

typi

cally

mor

e ro

bust

and

resi

st d

iges

tion

bette

r tha

n ot

her b

ony

stru

ctur

es b

ut d

o ev

entu

ally

di

gest

. In

cas

es w

here

cle

ithra

are

par

tially

dig

este

d, t

hey

can

typi

cally

be

iden

tifie

d to

fam

ily o

r ge

nus.

It is

hel

pful

to

deve

lop

a re

fere

nce

colle

ctio

n of

cle

ithra

for

sid

e-by

-sid

e co

mpa

rison

s, es

peci

ally

whe

n di

ffer

entia

ting

betw

een

sim

ilar

spec

ies.

Var

iatio

ns i

n th

e co

lor

of c

leith

ra

show

n in

thi

s gu

ide

are

caus

ed b

y pr

eser

vativ

es,

size

of

the

spec

imen

, an

d ph

oto

editi

ng,

and

ther

efor

e sh

ould

not

be

used

as

a di

agno

stic

ch

arac

teris

tic.

1

Page 10: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

INT

RO

DU

CT

ION

Die

t ana

lyse

s ar

e a

tool

com

mon

ly u

sed

by fi

sher

ies

man

ager

s to

det

erm

ine

feed

ing

habi

ts a

nd fo

od-w

eb in

tera

ctio

ns o

f aq

uatic

org

anis

ms.

Man

y di

ffer

ent m

etho

ds h

ave

been

use

d to

iden

tify

and

quan

tify

diet

s of

pis

civo

res,

but e

ach

met

hod

has

uniq

ue a

dvan

tage

s an

d di

sadv

anta

ges.

In m

any

stud

ies,

only

inta

ct fi

sh h

ave

been

incl

uded

in d

iet a

naly

ses—

prob

ably

bec

ause

of t

heir

ease

of i

dent

ifica

tion,

min

imal

tim

e re

quire

men

t, or

the

lack

of

nee

d fo

r sp

ecie

s-le

vel i

dent

ifica

tion.

How

ever

, the

mos

t acc

urat

e di

et a

naly

ses

requ

ire id

entif

icat

ion

and

quan

tific

atio

n of

inta

ct p

rey

item

s as

wel

l as

prey

item

s th

at a

re p

artia

lly o

r al

mos

t co

mpl

etel

y di

gest

ed. T

here

are

sev

eral

cha

ract

eris

tic b

ony

stru

ctur

es th

at c

an b

e us

ed to

iden

tify

parti

ally

dig

este

d fis

h, in

clud

ing

otol

iths,

verte

brae

, ope

rcle

s, ph

aryn

geal

arc

hes,

dent

arie

s, an

d cl

eith

ra. A

n ad

vant

age

of u

sing

oto

liths

is th

at th

ey

can

be u

sed

to id

entif

y fis

h to

the

spec

ies

leve

l. H

owev

er, t

hey

are

ofte

n di

ffic

ult t

o fin

d be

caus

e of

thei

r sm

all s

ize,

and

they

tend

als

o to

dig

est

quic

kly

and

can

be d

isso

lved

by

acid

ic p

rese

rvat

ives

suc

h as

for

mal

in (

McM

ahon

and

Tas

h 19

79).

In c

ompa

rison

, ver

tebr

ae c

an a

lso

be u

sed

to

iden

tify

fish

to th

e sp

ecie

s-le

vel (

Pikh

u an

d Pi

khu

1970

), an

d th

ey r

esis

t dig

estio

n be

tter

than

oto

liths

. How

ever

, ver

tebr

ae a

re m

ore

diff

icul

t to

quan

tify

than

pai

red

stru

ctur

es s

uch

as o

tolit

hs a

nd c

leith

ra b

ecau

se e

ach

indi

vidu

al v

erte

bra

mus

t be

ide

ntifi

ed a

nd a

ccou

nted

for

. O

perc

les,

phar

ynge

al a

rche

s, an

d de

ntar

ies h

ave

been

use

d al

so to

iden

tify

fish

and

are

adva

ntag

eous

bec

ause

they

resi

st d

iges

tion

bette

r tha

n le

ss ro

bust

bon

y st

ruct

ures

(H

anse

l et a

l. 19

88).

Alth

ough

the

se s

truct

ures

can

be

used

to

accu

rate

ly i

dent

ify f

ish

rem

ains

, cle

ithra

may

be

the

easi

est

and

mos

t ef

fect

ive

stru

ctur

e.

Cle

ithra

are

the

maj

or b

ones

of t

he p

ecto

ral g

irdle

. The

y ar

e pa

ired

stru

ctur

es w

ith o

ne lo

cate

d on

eac

h si

de o

f the

fish

and

toge

ther

form

the

fram

e of

the

body

wal

l dire

ctly

pos

terio

r to

the

oper

cula

r ca

vity

(Sc

harf

et a

l. 19

98).

Ther

e ar

e m

any

adva

ntag

es to

usi

ng c

leith

ra a

sa

diag

nost

ic b

ony

stru

ctur

e. N

ot o

nly

can

they

be

used

to id

entif

y m

any

fishe

s to

the

spec

ies

leve

l (H

anse

l et a

l. 19

88; S

char

f et a

l. 19

98),

but t

hey

can

also

be

used

to

age

fish

(Har

rison

and

Had

ley

1979

) and

to e

stim

ate

the

orig

inal

leng

th o

f par

tially

dig

este

d fis

h (H

anse

l et a

l. 19

88; S

char

f et a

l. 19

98; B

ur e

t al.

1997

). C

leith

raar

e al

so e

ffec

tive

stru

ctur

es fo

r die

t ana

lysi

s be

caus

e th

ey re

sist

dig

estio

n be

tter t

han

man

y ot

her d

iagn

ostic

bon

es, w

hich

mak

es it

po

ssib

le to

acc

urat

ely

quan

tify

the

num

ber o

f pre

y ite

ms i

n a

pred

ator

’s st

omac

h.

In a

rec

ent d

iet s

tudy

of

doub

le-c

rest

ed c

orm

oran

ts in

Thu

nder

Bay

, Mic

higa

n, c

leith

ra w

ere

used

to id

entif

y pa

rtial

ly d

iges

ted

fish.

Of

all p

rey

item

s fo

und

in s

tom

achs

, 46%

per

cent

wer

e id

entif

ied

usin

g cl

eith

ra (

A. M

oerk

e, L

ake

Supe

rior

Stat

e U

nive

rsity

, unp

ublis

hed

data

). In

ano

ther

st

udy

of d

oubl

e-cr

este

d co

rmor

ant d

iets

con

duct

ed o

n B

revo

ort L

ake,

Mic

higa

n, s

tom

ach

sam

ples

wer

e in

itial

ly a

naly

zed

usin

g on

ly in

tact

pre

y ite

ms.

The

sam

e sa

mpl

es w

ere

then

re-

anal

yzed

usi

ng c

leith

ra to

iden

tify

parti

ally

dig

este

d fis

h. U

seof

cle

ithra

res

ulte

d in

fin

ding

an

addi

tiona

l 16

% m

ore

prey

item

s, in

clud

ing

four

add

ition

al fi

sh sp

ecie

s (A

. Moe

rke,

Lak

e Su

perio

r Sta

te U

nive

rsity

, unp

ublis

hed

data

). R

elyi

ng so

lely

on

inta

ct

prey

item

s for

iden

tific

atio

n w

ould

hav

e re

sulte

d in

und

eres

timat

es o

f pre

y ite

ms c

onsu

med

as w

ell a

s a la

rger

pro

porti

on o

f uni

dent

ified

fish

es. T

he

resu

lts o

f the

se s

tudi

es s

ugge

st th

at u

sing

cle

ithra

is a

reas

onab

le a

ppro

ach

for a

naly

zing

gut

con

tent

s of

pis

civo

res.

How

ever

,ide

ntifi

catio

n gu

ides

to

ass

ist w

ith c

leith

rum

iden

tific

atio

n di

d no

t exi

st p

revi

ousl

y, y

et a

re n

eede

d to

ass

ist m

anag

ers w

ith id

entif

ying

fish

rem

ains

.

2

Page 11: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

CL

EIT

HR

UM

MO

RPH

OL

OG

YC

leith

ra a

re t

he m

ajor

bon

es o

f th

e pe

ctor

al g

irdle

. Th

ey a

re a

pai

red

stru

ctur

e, w

ith o

ne b

one

loca

ted

on

each

sid

e of

the

fish;

toge

ther

they

form

the

fram

e of

th

e bo

dy w

all

dire

ctly

pos

terio

r to

the

ope

rcul

ar

cavi

ty (S

char

f et a

l. 19

98).

Cle

ithru

m m

orph

olog

y is

de

scrib

ed fr

om fo

ur v

iew

s: in

side

late

ral v

iew

(ILV

), ou

tsid

e la

tera

l vi

ew (

OLV

), do

rsal

vie

w (

DV

), an

d an

terio

r vie

w (A

V).

Mor

phol

ogic

al te

rmin

olog

y us

ed

in th

is g

uide

was

adap

ted

from

Han

sel e

t al.

1988

.

Loca

tion

of le

ft cl

eith

rum

on

a ye

llow

per

ch

med

ial p

roce

ss

3

Dor

sopo

ster

ior l

obe

Ver

tical

lim

b

Spin

e

Hor

izon

tal l

imb

Yello

w p

erch

—IL

V of

righ

t cle

ithru

m

Ante

rior e

dge

of la

tera

l she

lf

Ante

rior t

ip o

f m

edia

l pro

cess

Late

ral s

helf

Blun

tnos

e m

inno

w—

DV

of ri

ght c

leith

rum

Sic

kle-

shap

ed p

roce

ss

Vent

ral f

old

Ale

wife

—IL

V of

righ

t cle

ithru

mBr

own

bullh

ead—

OLV

of r

ight

cle

ithru

m

Obj

ectio

ns o

n ve

rtica

l lim

b

Hor

izon

tal l

imb

Ante

rior t

ip o

f m

edia

l pro

cess

Dor

sopo

ster

ior

lobe

Bras

sy m

inno

w—

ILV

of l

eft c

leith

rum

Med

ial p

roce

ss

Med

ial p

roce

ss

Ver

tical

lim

b

Hor

izon

tal l

imb

Rou

nd g

oby—

AV o

f rig

ht c

leith

rum

Ver

tical

lim

b

Hor

izon

tal l

imb

Page 12: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

pp. 5

-12

pp. 1

3-15

pp.1

6-17

pp. 1

8-19

pp. 1

9-29

pp. 2

9-32

pp. 3

8-40

pp. 3

2-37

pp. 4

2-46

p. 4

1

4

KE

Y B

Y G

EN

ER

AL

SH

APE

Sele

ct th

e ge

nera

l cle

ithru

m sh

ape

(late

ral v

iew

) and

pro

ceed

toth

e co

rres

pond

ing

page

(s).

Page 13: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Fam

ily C

entr

arch

idae

Blu

egill

(Lep

omis

mac

roch

irus

)

Pum

pkin

seed

(Lep

omis

gib

bosu

s)

Cha

ract

eris

tic“d

ip”i

n th

e do

rsop

oste

rior l

obe

Dor

sopo

ster

ior l

obe

flatte

r tha

n ot

her c

entra

rchi

ds

Cle

ithra

are

cha

ract

eriz

ed b

y lo

nger

hor

izon

tal l

imbs

than

ver

tical

lim

bs, a

wel

l-pro

noun

ced

dors

opos

terio

r lob

e la

ckin

g se

rrat

ions

, and

a s

hort

spin

e at

th

e ap

ex o

f the

ver

tical

lim

b. M

ost c

entra

rchi

d sp

ecie

s in

this

gui

de c

an b

e ea

sily

diff

eren

tiate

d w

ith th

e ex

cept

ion

of s

mal

lmou

th b

ass

and

larg

emou

th

bass

, who

se c

leith

raar

e ve

ry si

mila

r in

size

and

shap

e.

ILV

ILV

OLV

OLV

5

IDE

NT

IFIC

AT

ION

BY

FA

MIL

Y

Page 14: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Fam

ily C

entr

arch

idae

, con

tinue

d

Smal

lmou

th b

ass (

Mic

ropt

erus

dol

omie

u)

Lar

gem

outh

bas

s (M

icro

pter

us sa

lmoi

des)

ILVILV

OLVOLV

6

Page 15: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Fam

ily C

entr

arch

idae

, con

tinue

d

Roc

k ba

ss (A

mbl

oplit

es ru

pest

ris)

Bla

ck c

rapp

ie (P

omox

is n

igro

mac

ulat

us)

Larg

er p

roje

ctio

ns th

an o

ther

cen

trarc

hids

Thic

k do

rsal

spi

ne

ILV

ILV

OLV

OLV

7

Page 16: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Fam

ily M

oron

idae

Dor

sopo

ster

ior l

obe

may

hav

e sm

all s

erra

tions

Whi

te p

erch

(Mor

one

amer

ican

a)

Shap

e of

dor

sopo

ster

ior l

obe

may

var

y fro

m

larg

er w

hite

per

ch

Mor

e ge

ntly

cur

ved

than

whi

te b

ass

Cle

ithra

are

sim

ilar

to t

he c

leith

ra o

f ce

ntra

rchi

ds.

They

are

cha

ract

eriz

ed b

y lo

nger

hor

izon

tal

limbs

tha

n ve

rtica

l lim

bs,

a w

ell-p

rono

unce

d do

rsop

oste

riorl

obe,

and

a s

hort

spin

e at

the

apex

of t

he v

ertic

al li

mb.

Exa

mpl

es o

f cle

ithra

from

bot

h sm

all a

nd la

rge

whi

te p

erch

are

pre

sent

ed in

this

gu

ide

beca

use

som

e of

the

ir ch

arac

teris

tics

appe

ar t

o ch

ange

as

they

gro

w l

arge

r. La

rger

spe

cim

ens

of w

hite

per

ch c

leith

ra g

ener

ally

hav

e sm

all

serr

atio

ns o

n a

mor

e ro

unde

d do

rsop

oste

riorl

obe,

whe

reas

smal

ler s

peci

men

s ofte

n la

ck se

rrat

ions

on

a le

ssro

unde

d do

rsop

oste

riorl

obe.

ILV

ILV

OLV

OLV

8

Page 17: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Fam

ily M

oron

idae

, con

tinue

d

Fam

ily S

ciae

nida

e

Fres

hwat

er d

rum

(Apl

odin

otus

gru

nnie

ns)

Flat

dors

opos

terio

rlob

eSi

ngle

pro

cess

Whi

te b

ass (

Mor

one

chry

sops

)

No

serra

tions

on

dors

opos

terio

rlob

e

Fres

hwat

er d

rum

cle

ithra

are

sim

ilar

to c

entra

rchi

d an

d m

oron

id c

leith

ra. T

hey

are

char

acte

rized

by

long

er h

oriz

onta

l lim

bs th

anve

rtica

l lim

bs, a

fla

t do

rsop

oste

riorl

obe

lack

ing

serr

atio

ns, a

sho

rt sp

ine

at th

e ap

ex o

f the

ver

tical

lim

b, a

nd a

sin

gle

proc

ess

exte

ndin

g fr

om th

e ve

ntra

l sid

e of

the

horiz

onta

l lim

b.

ILV

ILV

OLV

OLV

9

Page 18: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Fam

ily P

erco

psid

ae

Tro

utpe

rch

(Per

cops

is o

mis

com

aycu

s)

Fam

ily F

undu

lidae

Trou

tper

ch c

leith

ra a

re c

hara

cter

ized

by

long

er h

oriz

onta

l lim

bsth

an v

ertic

al li

mbs

, a lo

ng sp

ine

at th

e ap

ex o

f the

ver

tical

lim

b, a

nd a

not

ch b

etw

een

the

spin

e an

d do

rsop

oste

riorl

obe.

Wes

tern

ban

ded

killi

fish

clei

thra

are

cha

ract

eriz

ed b

y lo

nger

hor

izon

tal l

imbs

than

ver

tical

lim

bs a

nd a

squa

re-s

hape

d do

rsop

oste

riorl

obe.

Long

dor

sal s

pine

Not

ch b

etw

een

spin

e an

d do

rsop

oste

riorl

obe

ILV

OLV

10

Wes

tern

ban

ded

killi

fish

(Fun

dulu

s dia

phan

us m

enon

a)

Dor

sopo

ster

ior l

obe

is s

quar

e sh

aped

ILV

OLV

Page 19: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Fam

ily P

erci

dae

Wal

leye

(San

der v

itreu

s)

Dor

sopo

ster

ior l

obe

ofte

n se

rrat

ed in

juve

nile

s

Dor

sopo

ster

ior l

obe

may

not

be

serra

ted

in la

rger

fish

Cle

ithra

can

be

sepa

rate

d in

to tw

o gr

oups

by

gene

ral s

hape

—on

e gr

oup

repr

esen

ted

by y

ello

w p

erch

, wal

leye

, and

ruf

fe, a

nd t

he o

ther

by

darte

rs.

Yel

low

per

ch a

nd w

alle

ye c

leith

ra a

re c

hara

cter

ized

by

long

er h

oriz

onta

l lim

bs th

an v

ertic

al li

mbs

, a w

ell-p

rono

unce

d do

rsop

oste

riorl

obe,

and

a s

hort

spin

e at

the

apex

of t

he v

ertic

al li

mb.

Yel

low

per

ch c

leith

ra a

lway

s hav

e se

rrat

ions

on

the

dors

opos

terio

rlob

e, w

here

as w

alle

ye c

leith

ra m

ay o

r may

not

ha

ve se

rrat

ions

. Bec

ause

of t

heir

sim

ilarit

ies,

yello

w p

erch

and

wal

leye

cle

ithra

are

som

etim

es d

iffic

ult t

o di

ffer

entia

te.

ILV

ILV

OLV

OLV

11

Page 20: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Fam

ily P

erci

dae,

con

tinue

d

Yel

low

per

ch (P

erca

flav

esce

ns)

Dis

tinct

ser

ratio

ns o

n do

rsop

oste

riorl

obe

Mor

e cu

rved

than

in w

alle

yeIL

VO

LV

12

Ruf

fe (G

ymno

ceph

alus

cer

nuus

)

Dis

tinct

ser

ratio

ns o

n do

rsop

oste

riorl

obe

ILV

OLV

Page 21: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Fam

ily P

erci

dae,

con

tinue

dTh

e cl

eith

ra o

f da

rters

are

ver

y si

mila

r an

d m

ay n

ot b

e di

agno

stic

to th

e sp

ecie

s le

vel.

How

ever

, the

y ca

n ea

sily

be

sepa

rate

d fr

om o

ther

fam

ilies

. D

arte

r cl

eith

ra a

re c

hara

cter

ized

by

prot

rudi

ng d

orso

post

erio

rlo

bes,

a la

rge

notc

h be

twee

n th

e do

rsop

oste

rior

lobe

and

spi

ne o

n th

e ap

ex o

f th

e ve

rtica

l lim

b, a

nd a

“cl

ub”

on th

e an

terio

r end

of t

he h

oriz

onta

l lim

b.St

ripe

d fa

ntai

l dar

ter

(Eth

eost

oma

flabe

llare

lineo

latu

m)

Bla

cksi

de d

arte

r (P

erci

na m

acul

ata)

OLV

AV

OLV

AV

13

Page 22: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Fam

ily P

erci

dae,

con

tinue

d

John

ny d

arte

r (E

theo

stom

a ni

grum

)

Iow

a da

rter

(Eth

eost

oma

exile

)

AV AV

OLV

OLV

14

Page 23: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Bro

ok si

lver

side

cle

ithra

are

eas

ily se

para

ted

from

oth

er fa

mili

es. T

hey

are

mos

t sim

ilar t

o da

rter c

leith

ra b

ut la

ck a

spin

e on

the

apex

of t

he v

ertic

al li

mb.

Nor

ther

n lo

gper

ch (P

erci

na c

apro

des s

emifa

scia

ta)

OLV

AV

15

Fam

ily P

erci

dae,

con

tinue

d

Bro

ok si

lver

side

(Lab

ides

thes

sicc

ulus

)

Fam

ily A

ther

inid

ae

OLV

ILV

Page 24: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Fam

ily C

ottid

ae

Slim

y sc

ulpi

n (C

ottu

s cog

natu

s)

Mot

tled

and

slim

y sc

ulpi

n cl

eith

ra a

re d

iffic

ult t

o di

ffer

entia

te b

ut a

re e

asily

sep

arat

ed fr

om o

ther

fam

ilies

by

the

pres

ence

of a

larg

e fo

rk o

n th

e do

rsal

en

d an

d tw

o se

para

ted

lobe

s on

the

vent

ral s

ide

of th

e ho

rizon

tal l

imb.

Dee

pwat

er sc

ulpi

n cl

eith

ra la

ck th

e tw

o se

para

ted

lobe

s on

the

horiz

onta

l lim

b.

Mot

tled

scul

pin

(Cot

tus b

aird

ii)

Dis

tinct

fork

on

end

of c

leith

rum

Two

sepa

rate

d lo

bes

on h

oriz

onta

l lim

b

ILV

AV

16

Dis

tinct

fork

on

end

of c

leith

rum

Two

sepa

rate

d lo

bes

on h

oriz

onta

l lim

b

ILV

AV

Page 25: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Fam

ily G

obiid

ae

17

Rou

nd g

oby

(Neo

gobi

us m

elan

osto

mus

)

Rou

nd g

oby

clei

thra

are

cha

ract

eriz

ed b

y ha

ving

a la

rge

fork

on

the

dors

al e

nd a

nd a

sing

le ro

unde

d lo

be o

n th

e ve

ntra

l sid

e of

the

horiz

onta

l lim

b.

Dis

tinct

fork

on

end

of c

leith

rum

Sing

le lo

be

OLV

AV

Fam

ily C

ottid

ae, c

ontin

ued

Dee

pwat

er sc

ulpi

n (M

yoxo

ceph

alus

thom

pson

ii)

AVO

LVD

istin

ct fo

rk o

n en

d of

cle

ithru

m

Nar

row

hor

izon

tal l

imb

Page 26: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Thr

eesp

ine

stic

kleb

ack

(Gas

tero

steu

s acu

leat

us)

Flat

dor

sopo

ster

iorl

obe

Flat

ver

tical

lim

b

ILV

OLV

Bro

ok st

ickl

ebac

k (C

ulae

a in

cons

tans

)

Dor

sopo

ster

ior l

obe

flatte

r tha

n ni

nesp

ine

stic

kleb

ack

Dor

sopo

ster

ior l

obe

mor

e ro

unde

d th

an th

rees

pine

stic

kleb

ack

ILV

OLV

18

Fam

ily G

aste

rost

eida

e

Stic

kleb

ack

clei

thra

are

cha

ract

eriz

ed b

y lo

nger

hor

izon

tal l

imbs

than

ver

tical

lim

bs; f

lat o

r cu

rved

dor

sopo

ster

ior

lobe

s; a

nd n

arro

w, f

lat h

oriz

onta

l lim

bs, w

ith th

e ex

cept

ion

of th

e ni

nesp

ine

stic

kleb

ack,

whi

ch h

as a

larg

e pr

oces

s on

the

vent

ral s

ide

of th

e ho

rizon

tal l

imb.

Page 27: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Nin

espi

ne st

ickl

ebac

k (P

ungi

tius p

ungi

tius)

19

Larg

e pr

oces

s on

hor

izon

tal l

imb

Wav

y do

rsop

oste

riorl

obe

ILV

OLV

Fam

ily C

ypri

nida

eC

yprin

id c

leith

ra a

re e

asily

dis

tingu

ishe

d fr

om o

ther

fam

ilies

but

can

be

diff

icul

t to

dist

ingu

ish

with

in th

eir f

amily

. The

y ha

ve v

ertic

al a

nd h

oriz

onta

l lim

bs o

f va

ryin

g le

ngth

s, va

ryin

g si

zes

and

shap

es o

f do

rsop

oste

rior

lobe

s, an

d m

ay o

r m

ay n

ot h

ave

a ho

ok-li

ke p

roce

ss o

n th

e an

terio

r tip

of

the

med

ial p

roce

ss. U

nlik

e m

ost o

ther

fam

ilies

, cyp

rinid

s ca

n al

so b

e di

stin

guis

hed

by th

e sh

ape

of th

e la

tera

l she

lf (f

rom

the

dors

al v

iew

). In

sim

ilar

spec

ies,

the

shap

e of

the

late

ral s

helf

is o

ften

the

mos

t dia

gnos

tic c

hara

cter

istic

.

Fam

ily G

aste

rost

eida

e, c

ontin

ued

Fath

ead

min

now

(Pim

phal

es p

rom

elas

)

Ver

tical

lim

b lo

nger

than

ho

rizon

tal l

imb

ILV

No

hook

-like

pro

cess

on

ante

rior t

ip o

f med

ial

proc

ess

OLV

DV

Page 28: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Fam

ily C

ypri

nida

e, c

ontin

ued

20

Cre

ek c

hub

(Sem

otilu

s atr

omac

ulat

us)

No

hook

-like

pro

cess

on

ante

rior t

ip o

f med

ial

proc

ess

OLV

Ante

rior e

dge

of la

ter s

helf

curv

ed

DV

ILV

Long

and

sle

nder

ver

tical

an

d ho

rizon

tal l

imbs

Hor

nyhe

ad c

hub

(Noc

omis

big

utta

tus)

Smal

l hoo

k-lik

e pr

oces

s on

ant

erio

r tip

of

med

ial p

roce

ss

Long

and

sle

nder

ve

rtica

l and

hor

izon

tal

limbs

Ante

rior e

dge

of la

tera

l she

lf fla

t

ILV

OLV

DV

Page 29: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Fam

ily C

ypri

nida

e, c

ontin

ued

21

Red

side

dac

e (C

linos

tom

us e

long

atus

)

Com

mon

shin

er (L

uxilu

s cor

nutu

s)

Smal

l hoo

k-lik

e pr

oces

s on

ant

erio

r tip

of m

edia

l pr

oces

s

Verti

cal a

nd h

oriz

onta

l lim

bs a

ppro

xim

atel

y th

e sa

me

leng

th

ILV

OLV

DV

No

hook

-like

pro

cess

on

ant

erio

r tip

of

med

ial p

roce

ss

Sm

all p

roce

ssN

arro

w la

tera

l she

lf

ILV

OLV

DV

Page 30: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Fam

ily C

ypri

nida

e, c

ontin

ued

22

Sand

shin

er (N

otro

pis s

tram

ineu

s)

Mim

ic sh

iner

(Not

ropi

s vol

ucel

lus)

Larg

e pr

oces

s on

ver

tical

lim

b

No

hook

-like

pro

cess

on

ante

rior t

ip o

f med

ial

proc

ess

Nar

row

late

ral s

helf

ILV

OLV

DV

Nar

row

late

ral s

helf

No

hook

-like

pro

cess

on

ante

rior t

ip o

f med

ial

proc

ess

ILV

OLV

DV

Page 31: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Fam

ily C

ypri

nida

e, c

ontin

ued

23

Em

eral

d sh

iner

(Not

ropi

s ath

erin

oide

s)

Spot

tail

shin

er (N

otro

pis h

udso

nius

)

Verti

cal a

nd h

oriz

onta

l lim

bs a

ppro

xim

atel

y th

e sa

me

leng

th

ILV

Larg

e m

edia

l pro

cess

Late

ral s

helf

exte

nds

beyo

nd

the

rest

of c

leith

rum

(opp

osite

of

mos

t oth

er c

yprin

ids)

DV

Hoo

k-lik

e pr

oces

s on

an

terio

r tip

of m

edia

l pr

oces

s

OLV

DV

Hoo

k-lik

e pr

oces

s on

an

terio

r tip

of m

edia

l pr

oces

s

ILV

Dor

sopo

ster

ior l

obe

does

not

ext

end

as fa

r ou

t as

in e

mer

ald

shin

er

OLV

Page 32: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Fam

ily C

ypri

nida

e, c

ontin

ued

24

Blu

ntno

se m

inno

w (P

imep

hale

snot

atus

)

Gol

den

shin

er (N

otem

igon

us c

ryso

leuc

as)

Verti

cal a

nd h

oriz

onta

l lim

bs a

ppro

xim

atel

y th

e sa

me

leng

th

ILV

Wid

e la

tera

l she

lf

Larg

e m

edia

l pro

cess

DV

Hoo

k-lik

e pr

oces

s on

an

terio

r tip

of m

edia

l pr

oces

s

OLV

Smal

l hoo

k-lik

e pr

oces

s on

ant

erio

r tip

of m

edia

l pr

oces

s

Ver

tical

lim

b lo

nger

th

an h

oriz

onta

l lim

bEn

d of

cle

ithru

m ro

unde

d

ILV

OLV

DV

Page 33: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Fam

ily C

ypri

nida

e, c

ontin

ued

25

Nor

ther

n re

dbel

lyda

ce (P

hoxi

nuse

os)

Fine

scal

e da

ce (P

hoxi

nusn

eoga

eus)

Ver

tical

lim

b sh

orte

r th

an h

oriz

onta

l lim

bN

o ho

ok-li

ke p

roce

ss o

n an

terio

r tip

of m

edia

l pr

oces

s

ILV

DV

OLV

Ver

tical

lim

b lo

nger

th

an h

oriz

onta

l lim

bILV

No

hook

-like

pro

cess

on

ant

erio

r tip

of

med

ial p

roce

ss

OLV

DV

Page 34: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Fam

ily C

ypri

nida

e, c

ontin

ued

26

Bla

ckno

sesh

iner

(Not

ropi

s het

erol

epis

)

Nor

ther

n pe

arl d

ace

(Mar

gari

scus

nach

trie

bi)

DV

Ver

y sm

all o

r no

hook

-like

pro

cess

on

ante

rior t

ip o

f med

ial

proc

ess

Hor

izon

tal l

imb

long

er th

an v

ertic

al

limb

OLV

ILV

OLV

—rig

ht c

leith

rum

No

hook

-like

pro

cess

on

ante

rior t

ip o

f med

ial p

roce

ss

Dor

sopo

ster

ior l

obe

may

be

stra

ight

Dor

sopo

ster

ior l

obe

may

be

curv

ed

ILV—

left

clei

thru

mD

V

Page 35: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Fam

ily C

ypri

nida

e, c

ontin

ued

27

Gol

dfis

h (C

aras

sius

aura

tus)

Com

mon

car

p (C

ypri

nus c

arpi

o)

Smal

l hoo

k-lik

e pr

oces

s on

an

terio

r tip

of m

edia

l pro

cess

ILV

DV

OLV

ILV

DV

OLV

No

hook

-like

pro

cess

on

ant

erio

r tip

of

med

ial p

roce

ss

Page 36: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Fam

ily C

ypri

nida

e, c

ontin

ued

Wes

tern

bla

ckno

se d

ace

(Rhi

nich

thys

obt

usus

)

Lon

gnos

e da

ce (R

hini

chth

ys c

atar

acta

e)

Dor

sopo

ster

ior l

obe

smal

ler t

han

in

Gre

at L

akes

long

nose

dac

e

Proc

ess

mor

e pr

onou

nced

th

an in

wes

tern

bla

ckno

se

dace

ILV

ILV

OLV

OLV

28

Page 37: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Fam

ily C

ypri

nida

e, c

ontin

ued

29

Shor

tjaw

cis

co (C

oreg

onus

zeni

thic

us)

Bra

ssy

min

now

(Hyb

ogna

thus

hank

inso

ni)

Larg

e ho

ok-li

ke

proc

ess

on a

nter

ior t

ip

of m

edia

l pro

cess

Larg

e do

rsop

oste

riorl

obe

ILV

OLV

DV

Subf

amily

Cor

egon

inae

Cle

ithra

are

diff

icul

t to

diff

eren

tiate

with

the

exce

ptio

n of

roun

d w

hite

fish.

The

cle

ithra

of c

oreg

onid

s ar

e ch

arac

teriz

ed b

y la

rge

dors

opos

terio

rlob

es,

thic

k ho

rizon

tal l

imbs

, and

a lo

ng sp

ine

at th

e ap

ex o

f the

ver

tical

lim

b.

OLV

ILV

Page 38: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Subf

amily

Cor

egon

inae

, con

tinue

d

30

Blo

ater

(Cor

egon

us h

oyi)

ILV

OLV

Kiy

i (C

oreg

onus

kiy

i)

OLV

ILV

Page 39: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Subf

amily

Cor

egon

inae

, con

tinue

d

Lak

e w

hite

fish

(Cor

egon

us c

lupe

afor

mis

)

Cis

co (C

oreg

onus

art

edi)

ILV

ILV

OLV

OLV

31

Page 40: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Subf

amily

Cor

egon

inae

, con

tinue

d

Rou

nd w

hite

fish

(Pro

sopi

um c

ylin

drac

eum

)

Subf

amily

Sal

mon

inae

Spla

ke (b

rook

trou

t Sal

velin

us fo

ntin

alis

xla

ke tr

outS

. nam

aycu

sh)

Cle

ithra

of

trout

and

sal

mon

are

ver

y si

mila

r. Th

ey a

re c

hara

cter

ized

by

horiz

onta

l an

d ve

rtica

l lim

bs o

f ap

prox

imat

ely

equa

l le

ngth

, na

rrow

do

rsop

oste

riorl

obes

, and

a sh

ort s

pine

at t

he a

pex

of th

e ve

rtica

l lim

b.

ILV

OLV

Hor

izon

tal l

imb

thic

ker t

han

othe

r co

rego

nids

ILV

OLV

32

Page 41: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Subf

amily

Sal

mon

inae

, con

tinue

d

33

Bro

ok tr

out (

Salv

elin

us fo

ntin

alis

)

Lak

e tr

out (

Salv

elin

us n

amay

cush

)

ILV

ILV

OLV

OLV

Page 42: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Subf

amily

Sal

mon

inae

, con

tinue

d

Rai

nbow

trou

t (st

eelh

ead)

—M

ichi

gan

stra

in (O

ncor

hync

hus m

ykis

s)

Rai

nbow

trou

t—E

agle

Lak

e st

rain

(Onc

orhy

nchu

s myk

iss)

ILV

ILV

OLV

OLV

34

Page 43: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Subf

amily

Sal

mon

inae

, con

tinue

d

Chi

nook

salm

on (O

ncor

hync

hus t

scha

wyt

scha

)

Coh

o sa

lmon

(Onc

orhy

nchu

s kis

utch

)

ILV

ILV

OLV OLV

35

Page 44: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Subf

amily

Sal

mon

inae

, con

tinue

d

Atla

ntic

salm

on (S

alm

o sa

lar)

Bro

wn

trou

t (Sa

lmo

trut

ta)

ILV

ILV

OLV

OLV

36

Page 45: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Fam

ily U

mbr

idae

Cen

tral

mud

min

now

(Um

bra

limi)

Rai

nbow

smel

t (O

smer

us m

orda

x)

Fam

ily O

smer

idae

Larg

e, c

urvi

ng d

orso

post

erio

rlob

e

Not

ch b

etw

een

dors

opos

terio

rlob

e an

d sp

ine

Rai

nbow

smel

t cle

ithra

hav

e ho

rizon

tal a

nd v

ertic

al li

mbs

of a

ppro

xim

atel

y eq

ual l

engt

h, a

larg

e do

rsop

oste

riorl

obe,

and

a lo

ng sp

ine

at th

e ap

ex o

f the

ve

rtica

l lim

b.

Cen

tral m

udm

inno

w c

leith

ra a

re c

hara

cter

ized

by

a la

rge,

cur

ved

dors

opos

terio

rlob

e; lo

ng sp

ine

at th

e ap

ex o

f the

ver

tical

lim

b; a

nd n

otch

bet

wee

n th

e sp

ine

and

dors

opos

terio

rlob

e.

ILV

ILV

OLV

OLV

37

Page 46: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Fam

ily E

soci

dae

Nor

ther

n pi

ke (E

sox

luci

us)

Mus

kellu

nge

(Eso

x m

asqu

inon

gy)

Dor

sopo

ster

ior l

obe

larg

er a

nd m

ore

gent

ly

curv

ed th

an in

nor

ther

n pi

ke

Cle

ithra

hav

e lo

ng h

oriz

onta

l lim

bs, s

hort

verti

cal l

imbs

, sm

alld

orso

post

erio

rlo

bes,

and

a sh

ort s

pine

at t

he a

pex

of th

e ve

rtica

l lim

b. N

orth

ern

pike

an

d m

uske

llung

e cl

eith

ra a

re si

mila

r but

can

be

diff

eren

tiate

d by

the

size

and

shap

e of

the

dors

opos

terio

rlob

e.

ILV

OLV

38

Dor

sopo

ster

ior l

obe

smal

ler t

han

in m

uske

llung

eILV

OLV

Page 47: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Fam

ily G

adid

ae

Bur

bot (

Lota

lota

)

Bow

fin (A

mia

cal

va)

Fam

ily A

miid

ae

Tria

ngle

-sha

ped

proc

ess

on d

orso

post

erio

rlob

e

Bow

fin c

leith

ra h

ave

long

hor

izon

tal l

imbs

; sho

rt ve

rtica

l lim

bs; a

nd a

sho

rt, s

tout

spi

ne a

t the

ape

x of

the

verti

cal l

imb.

Cle

ithra

are

sim

ilar

to th

e cl

eith

ra o

f nor

ther

n pi

ke a

nd m

uske

llung

e bu

t hav

e a

prop

ortio

nally

larg

er d

orso

post

erio

rlob

e.

Bur

bot c

leith

ra h

ave

long

hor

izon

tal l

imbs

, sho

rt ve

rtica

l lim

bs, a

nd a

shor

t, st

out s

pine

at t

he a

pex

of th

e ve

rtica

l lim

b. B

urbo

t cle

ithra

hav

e a

trian

gle-

shap

ed p

roce

ss o

n th

e ve

ntra

l sid

e of

the

dors

opos

terio

rlob

e.

ILV

OLV

Nar

row

in m

iddl

e of

cle

ithru

m

ILV

OLV

39

Page 48: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Fam

ily L

epis

oste

idae

40

Lon

gnos

e ga

r (L

epis

oste

us o

sseu

s)

Spot

ted

gar

(Lep

isos

teus

ocu

latu

s)

Gar

cle

ithra

are

cha

ract

eriz

ed b

y a

very

larg

e do

rsop

oste

riorl

obe,

shor

t spi

ne a

t the

ape

x of

the

verti

cal l

imb,

and

larg

e la

tera

l she

lf.

Larg

e la

tera

l she

lf

Larg

e do

rsop

oste

riorl

obe

ILV

OLV

DV

Hor

izon

tal l

imb

prop

ortio

nally

sh

orte

r tha

n lo

ngno

se g

arLa

rge

dors

opos

terio

rlob

e

ILV

OLV

DV

Page 49: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Fam

ily C

lupe

idae

Ale

wife

(Alo

sa p

seud

ohar

engu

s)

Giz

zard

shad

(Dor

osom

a ce

pedi

anum

)

Proc

ess

larg

er th

an in

ale

wife

Dis

tinct

twis

t in

clei

thru

m

Cle

ithra

are

eas

ily d

istin

guis

hed

from

oth

er f

amili

es. T

hey

have

thin

hor

izon

tal a

nd v

ertic

al li

mbs

and

a v

entra

l fol

d in

the

horiz

onta

l lim

b. A

lew

ife

clei

thra

hav

e a

sick

le-s

hape

d pr

oces

s lo

cate

d m

edia

lly. G

izza

rd s

had

also

hav

e a

med

ially

loca

ted

proc

ess,

but i

t is

muc

h la

rger

than

the

sick

le-s

hape

d pr

oces

s of a

lew

ife.

ILV

OLV

41

Sic

kle-

shap

ed p

roce

ssD

istin

ct tw

ist i

n cl

eith

rumIL

VO

LV

Page 50: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Fam

ily Ic

talu

rida

e

Bro

wn

bullh

ead

(Am

eiur

us n

ebul

osus

)

Cha

nnel

cat

fish

(Ict

alur

us p

unct

atus

)

Low

er o

bjec

tion

long

er th

an in

bro

wn

bullh

ead

Thre

e ob

ject

ions

on

verti

cal l

imb

Low

er o

bjec

tion

shor

ter t

han

in c

hann

el c

atfis

h

Cle

ithra

are

cha

ract

eriz

ed b

y th

ree

obje

ctio

ns o

n th

e ve

rtica

l lim

b.

ILV

ILV

OLV

OLV

42

Page 51: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Fam

ily C

atos

tom

idae

43

Whi

te su

cker

(Cat

osto

mus

com

mer

soni

i)

Silv

er r

edho

rse

(Mox

osto

ma

anis

urum

)

Cle

ithra

are

cha

ract

eriz

ed b

y a

wid

e ho

rizon

tal l

imb

term

inat

ing

in th

ree

obje

ctio

ns. A

dor

sal v

iew

of

the

late

ral s

helf

is h

elpf

ul in

dis

tingu

ishi

ng

betw

een

the

spec

ies w

ithin

this

fam

ily.

Ver

tical

lim

b lo

nger

than

ho

rizon

tal l

imb

ILV

OLV

DV

Thre

e ob

ject

ions

on

horiz

onta

l lim

b

Ver

tical

lim

b lo

nger

th

an h

oriz

onta

l lim

b

ILV

OLV

DV

Page 52: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Fam

ily C

atos

tom

idae

, con

tinue

d

44

Lon

gnos

e su

cker

(Cat

osto

mus

cat

osto

mus

)

Nor

ther

n ho

g su

cker

(Hyp

ente

lium

nigr

ican

s)

Hor

izon

tal l

imb

long

er th

an

verti

cal l

imb

ILV

OLV

DV

Ver

tical

lim

b lo

nger

th

an h

oriz

onta

l lim

b

Larg

e ho

ok-li

ke p

roce

ss

ILV

OLV

DV

Page 53: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Fam

ily C

atos

tom

idae

, con

tinue

d

45

Gol

den

redh

orse

(Mox

osto

ma

eryt

hrur

um)

Shor

thea

d re

dhor

se (M

oxos

tom

am

acro

lepi

dotu

m)

ILV

OLV

DV

ILV

OLV

DV

Ver

tical

lim

b lo

nger

th

an h

oriz

onta

l lim

b

Ver

tical

lim

b lo

nger

th

an h

oriz

onta

l lim

b

Page 54: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Fam

ily C

atos

tom

idae

, con

tinue

d

46

Spot

ted

suck

er (M

inyt

rem

am

elan

ops)

Qui

llbac

k (C

arpi

odes

cypr

inus

)D

V

ILV

OLV

DV

ILV

OLV

DV

Ver

tical

lim

b lo

nger

th

an h

oriz

onta

l lim

b

Out

side

obj

ectio

n ro

unde

d

Hoo

k-lik

e pr

oces

s

Ver

tical

lim

b lo

nger

th

an h

oriz

onta

l lim

b

Page 55: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

CO

MPA

RIS

ON

OF

SIM

ILA

R S

PEC

IES

47

Yel

low

Per

chB

lueg

ill

Pum

pkin

seed

Smal

lmou

th b

ass

Larg

emou

th b

ass

Roc

k ba

ss

Whi

te p

erch

Whi

te p

erch

Blac

k cr

appi

e

Whi

te b

ass

Wal

leye

Wal

leye

Fres

hwat

er d

rum

Wes

tern

ban

ded

killif

ish

Trou

tper

ch

Yel

low

per

ch

Ruf

fe

Page 56: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Thre

espi

ne s

tickl

ebac

k

Broo

k st

ickl

ebac

k

Nin

espi

ne s

tickl

ebac

k

Mot

tled

scul

pin

Slim

y sc

ulpi

n

Rou

nd g

oby

Nor

ther

n lo

gper

ch

Iow

a da

rter

John

ny d

arte

r

48

Dee

pwat

er s

culp

in

Blac

ksid

e da

rter

Strip

ed fa

ntai

l dar

ter

Broo

k si

lver

side

Giz

zard

sha

dA

lew

ife

CO

MPA

RIS

ON

OF

SIM

ILA

R S

PEC

IES,

con

tinue

d

Page 57: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

Mim

ic s

hine

r

49

Bras

sy m

inno

wEm

eral

d sh

iner

Gol

den

shin

er

Spot

tail

shin

er

Fath

ead

min

now

Fine

scal

e da

ce

Nor

ther

n re

dbel

ly d

ace

Com

mon

car

p

Cre

ek c

hub

Hor

nyhe

ad c

hub

Red

side

dac

e

Com

mon

shi

ner

Sand

shi

ner

Blac

knos

e sh

iner

Blun

tnos

e m

inno

w

CO

MPA

RIS

ON

OF

SIM

ILA

R S

PEC

IES,

con

tinue

d

Page 58: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

50

Emer

ald

shin

erBr

assy

min

now

Gol

den

shin

er

Spot

tail

shin

er

Fath

ead

min

now

Fine

scal

e da

ce

Nor

ther

n re

dbel

ly d

ace

Com

mon

car

p

Cre

ek c

hub

Hor

neyh

ead

chub

Blun

tnos

e m

inno

w

Com

mon

shi

ner

Sand

shi

ner

Mim

ic s

hine

rR

edsi

de d

ace

Blac

knos

e sh

iner

CO

MPA

RIS

ON

OF

SIM

ILA

R S

PEC

IES,

con

tinue

d

Page 59: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

51

Coh

o sa

lmon

Brow

n tro

utN

orth

ern

pear

l dac

eN

orth

ern

pear

l dac

e

Lake

trou

t

Broo

k tro

ut

Rai

nbow

trou

t (Ea

gle

Lake

stra

in)

Chi

nook

sal

mon

Atla

ntic

sal

mon

Spla

ke

Gol

dfis

hG

oldf

ish

Rai

nbow

trou

t (M

ichi

gan

stra

in)

Wes

tern

bla

ckno

se d

ace

Long

nose

dac

e

CO

MPA

RIS

ON

OF

SIM

ILA

R S

PEC

IES,

con

tinue

d

Page 60: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

52

Nor

ther

n pi

ke

Cen

tral m

udm

inno

w

Long

nose

gar

Kiy

i

Lake

whi

tefis

h

Cis

coB

row

n bu

llhea

d

Mus

kellu

nge

Burb

ot

Bow

fin

Cha

nnel

cat

fish

Rou

nd w

hite

fish

Bloa

ter

Rai

nbow

sm

elt

Sho

rtjaw

cis

co

Spot

ted

gar

CO

MPA

RIS

ON

OF

SIM

ILA

R S

PEC

IES,

con

tinue

d

Page 61: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

53

Silv

er re

dhor

se

Whi

te s

ucke

rW

hite

suc

ker

Silv

er re

dhor

se

Long

nose

suc

ker

Long

nose

suc

ker

Nor

ther

n ho

g su

cker

Nor

ther

n ho

g su

cker

Shor

thea

d re

dhor

seSh

orth

ead

redh

orse

Gol

den

redh

orse

Gol

den

redh

orse

Spot

ted

suck

erSp

otte

d su

cker

Qui

llbac

kQ

uillb

ack

CO

MPA

RIS

ON

OF

SIM

ILA

R S

PEC

IES,

con

tinue

d

Page 62: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

AC

KN

OW

LE

DG

EM

EN

TS

Ther

e ar

e m

any

peop

le w

e w

ould

lik

e to

ack

now

ledg

e an

d th

ank

for

thei

r co

ntrib

utio

ns t

o th

is g

uide

. B

illy

Kei

per

(Lak

e Su

perio

r St

ate

Uni

vers

ity)

help

ed a

naly

ze s

tom

ach

cont

ents

, ide

ntify

cle

ithra

, and

bui

ld o

ur r

efer

ence

col

lect

ion

of f

ish

bone

s. M

ike

Bur

and

Bill

Edw

ards

(U

SGS)

pro

vide

d tra

inin

g on

sto

mac

h an

alys

is a

nd c

leith

rum

iden

tific

atio

n. J

ason

Jon

es (U

SGS)

cre

ated

an

initi

al u

npub

lishe

d gu

ide,

whi

ch w

as

the

impe

tus

for

this

gui

de. M

att P

umfe

ry, J

esse

Com

ben,

and

Sco

tt C

ollin

s as

sist

ed w

ith f

ield

col

lect

ions

. Geo

ff S

tein

hart

assi

sted

with

fis

h id

entif

icat

ion.

The

U.S

. Fi

sh a

nd W

ildlif

e Se

rvic

e, J

orda

n R

iver

Nat

iona

l Fi

sh H

atch

ery;

Mic

higa

n D

epar

tmen

t of

Nat

ural

Res

ourc

es a

nd

Envi

ronm

ent (

DN

RE)

, Tho

mps

on, P

latte

Riv

er, a

nd M

arqu

ette

sta

te f

ish

hatc

herie

s; D

ave

Fiel

der;

and

Jim

Joh

nson

pro

vide

d sp

ecim

ens.

Dav

e C

lapp

, Pat

O’N

eill,

Eric

Cris

sman

, Sha

wn

Sita

r and

Kur

t New

man

revi

ewed

the

guid

e. J

ohn

Lyon

s pr

ovid

ed s

ever

al fi

sh p

ictu

res

that

wer

e us

ed

in th

is g

uide

, inc

ludi

ng th

rees

pine

stic

kleb

ack,

reds

ide

dace

, san

d sh

iner

, mim

ic s

hine

r, em

eral

d sh

iner

, and

mus

kellu

nge.

Fin

anci

al s

uppo

rt fo

r pr

intin

g th

e gu

ide

was

pro

vide

d by

the

Gre

at L

akes

Fis

hery

Com

mis

sion

.

RE

FER

EN

CE

SB

ur, M

.T.,

Tinn

irello

, S.L

., Lo

vell,

C.D

., an

d Ty

son,

J.T.

. 199

7. D

iet o

f the

dou

ble-

cres

ted

corm

oran

t in

Wes

tern

Lak

e Er

ie. S

ympo

sium

on

doub

le-c

rest

ed

corm

oran

ts: p

opul

atio

n st

atus

and

man

agem

ent i

ssue

s in

the

Mid

wes

t. U

.S. D

ep. A

gric

. Ani

m. P

lant

Hea

lth In

spec

tion

Serv

. Tec

h. B

ull.

No.

187

9.

Han

sel,

H.C

., D

uke,

S.D

., Lo

fy, P

.T.,

and

Gra

y, G

.A. 1

988.

Use

of d

iagn

ostic

bon

es to

iden

tify

and

estim

ate

orig

inal

leng

ths o

f ing

este

d pr

ey fi

shes

. Tra

ns. A

m.

Fish

. Soc

. 117

: 55-

62.

Har

rison

, E.J.

, and

Had

ley,

W.F

. 197

9. A

com

paris

on o

f the

use

of c

leith

ra to

the

use

of sc

ales

for a

ge a

nd g

row

th st

udie

s. Tr

ans.

Am

. Fis

h. S

oc.1

08: 4

52-4

56.

McM

ahon

, T.E

., an

d Ta

sh, J

.C. 1

979.

Eff

ects

of f

orm

alin

(buf

fere

d an

d un

buff

ered

) and

hyd

roch

loric

aci

d on

fish

oto

liths

. Cop

eia

1979

: 155

-156

.

Pikh

u, E

.K.H

., an

d Pi

khu,

E.R

. 197

0. R

econ

stru

ctio

n of

the

size

s of f

ishe

s sw

allo

wed

by

pred

ator

s fro

m fr

agm

ents

of t

heir

verte

bral

col

umn.

J. Ic

hthy

ol. 1

0:

706-

709.

Scha

rf, F

.S.,

Yet

ter,

R.M

., Su

mm

ers,

A.P

., an

d Ju

anes

, F. 1

998.

Enh

anci

ng d

iet a

naly

ses o

f pis

civo

rous

fish

es in

the

Nor

thw

est A

tlant

ic th

roug

h id

entif

icat

ion

and

reco

nstru

ctio

n of

orig

inal

pre

y si

zes f

rom

inge

sted

rem

ains

.Fis

h. B

ull.

96: 5

75-5

88.

54

Page 63: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change
Page 64: Identification of Michigan Fishes Using Cleithravariation in cleithrum shape. In white perch and walleye, cleithrum changes appear to o ccur as fish grow larger, with the primary change

MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS

February 1993 What's next? The prediction and management of exotic species in the Great Lakes (report of the 1991 workshop). E.L. Mills, J.H. Leach, C.L. Secor, and J.T. Carlton. 22 p.

August 1993 A survey of fish-community and habitat goals/objectives/targets and status in Great Lakes areas of concern. J.H. Hartig. 95 p.

August 1993 Toward integrating remedial-action and fishery-management planning in Great Lakes areas of concern. J.H. Hartig. 34 p

September 1994 Walleye-rehabilitation guidelines for the Great Lakes area. P.J. Colby, C.A. Lewis, R.L. Eshenroder, R.C. Haas, L.J. Hushak. 112 p.

April 1996 A lake trout restoration plan for Lake Superior. M.J. Hansen [ED.]. 34 p.

August 1998 A lake trout rehabilitation guide for Lake Huron. M.P. Ebener [ED.]. 48 p.

2003-01 A rehabilitation plan for walleye populations and habitats in Lake Superior. M.H. Hoff [ED.]. 22 p.

2003-02 A lake sturgeon rehabilitation plan for Lake Superior. N.A. Auer [ED.]. 28 p.

2003-03 A brook trout rehabilitation plan for Lake Superior. L.E. Newman, R.B. DuBois, and T.N. Halpern [EDS]. 40 p.

2006-01 A mid-decade review of progress under a “strategic vision of the Great Lakes Fishery Commission for the first decade of the new millennium.” 45 p.

2006-02 Application of a dichotomous key to the classification of sea lamprey marks on Great Lakes fish. Ebener, M.P., E.L. King, Jr., T.A. Edsall. 22 p.

2007-01 A joint strategic plan for management of Great Lakes fisheries. Great Lakes Fishery Commission [ED.]. 28 p.

2007-02 Application of a dichotomous key to the classification of sea lamprey Petromyzon marinus marks on lake sturgeon Acipenser fulvescens. Patrick, H.K., T.M. Sutton, and W.D. Swink. 24 p.

2008-01 A guide for the rehabilitation of lake trout in Lake Michigan. Bronte, C.R., C.C. Krueger, M.E. Holey, M.L. Toneys, R.L. Eshenroder, and J.L. Jonas. 40 p.

2008-02 A strategic plan for the rehabilitation of lake trout in Lake Erie, 2008-2020. Markham, J.L., Cook, A., MacDougall, T., Witzel, L. Kayle, K., Murray, M., Fodale, M., Trometer, E., Neave, F., Fitzsimons, J. Francis, J. Stapanian, M. 42 p.

2010-01 Genetic Guidelines for the Stocking of Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) in the Great Lakes Basin. Amy B. Welsh, Robert F. Elliott, Kim T. Scribner, Henry R. Quinlan, Edward A. Baker, Bradley T. Eggold, J. Marty Holtgren, Charles C. Krueger, and Bernie May. 62 p.

Cover photograph of a yellow perch cleithrum provided by D. Traynor.