ideas for west oxford street - waverley council...sydney 02 9387 2600 level 6 332 – 342 oxford...

Ideas for West Oxford Street

Consultation Outcomes Report: Final Report

Client: Waverley Council

Date:17 July 2014

Contact: Brendan Blakeley

[email protected]

9387-2600

Sydney

02 9387 2600

Level 6

332 – 342 Oxford Street

Bondi Junction NSW 2022

www.elton.com.au [email protected]

Sydney | Canberra | Darwin ABN 56 003 853 101

Prepared by Lucy Greig

Reviewed by Brendan Blakeley

Date 170714

Document name Draft Report

Version 0

1 CONSULTATION PROCESS 4

1.1 Overview 4

1.2 What is the purpose of the consultation process? 4

1.3 What were the consultation methods used and who participated? 5

2 CONSULTATION OUTCOMES 7

2.1 What were the key themes raised in participant feedback? 7

2.1.1 What people value about the West Oxford Street area 7

2.1.2 Key issues for the future of the area 7

3 NEXT STEPS 12

3.1 How has community feedback been used? 12

3.2 What are the next steps? 12

APPENDICES

A Consultation Outcomes Report: Phase One Report 14

B Consultation Outcomes: Concepts Session 15

C Consultation Outcomes: Public Briefing Session 16

Contents

4 Ideas for West Oxford Street Elton Consulting

1.1 Overview

This document has been prepared for Waverley Council by Elton Consulting. It summarises the

outcomes of community consultation activities undertaken as part of the West Oxford Street

Precinct Plan study. The consultation process commenced in March 2014 and the activities

discussed in this report were conducted over the four month period, to June 2014.

This document provides an overview of the process and outcomes. Further detailed information

from each phase of the consultation is provided in:

» Consultation Outcomes Report: Phase One Report (April) – Appendix A

» Consultation Outcomes: Concepts Session (May) – Appendix B

» Consultation Outcomes: Public Briefing Session (July) – Appendix C.

Some of the key objectives of the West Oxford Street ideas study are to:

» Consider the existing qualities of the West Oxford Street precinct

» Consider the future desired character of the West Oxford Street Precinct

» Better connect West Oxford Street with Sydney’s famous Centennial Park, Woollahra and the

Bondi Junction town centre

» Integrate the various transport modes

» Engage government agencies and the community in a conversation about the future of this part

of the Waverley Area.

1.2 What is the purpose of the consultation process?

The consultation process for the West Oxford Street study was designed to identify community

values for the area, to consider this information as an input to a design ideas process, and to test

initial ideas for the area with the community.

Table 1 Consultation process overview

Phase / Activity Purpose and format

1 – Community Drop-In Sessions (x2)

These sessions were held in advance of the design charette in order to provide members of the community with information about the study and to obtain feedback on community values for the study area.

Days 1 and 2 of the design charette considered community input collected through the two community drop in sessions.

2 –Concepts Session This session was held on the evening of Day 2 of the design charette in order to provide members of the community with an opportunity to see the work in progress draft concepts and ideas generated by the design teams as

1 Consultation process

Ideas for West Oxford Street Elton Consulting 5

Phase / Activity Purpose and format

part of Days 1 and 2 of the charette.

Day 3 of the design charette considered community input collected through the three community drop in sessions, as part of the process of further refining the concepts and ideas.

3 – Public Briefing Session This session was held to present the ideas and design concepts developed by the three independent design teams – Hill Thalis, Simpson + Wilson, and Archrival – in liaison with Council and the NSW Government Architect’s Office, through the design charette process. The session was led by Waverley Council with questions and answers facilitated by Elton Consulting.

1.3 What were the consultation methods used and who participated?

There was a high level of community interest and participation in the consultation activities for the

West Oxford Street Precinct Plan study. The consultation methods used in the study and

participant numbers are summarised below.

Table 2 Snapshot of consultation methods

Activity Details

“Ideas in the Park” Community Drop-In Session No. 1

St James Reserve, Saturday 8 March 2014,

11am-1pm

Approximate no. of participants: 200

Comments received at session: 177

“Ideas in the Library” Community Drop-In

Session No. 2 Waverley Library, Thursday 3 April 2014,

5.30pm-7.30pm



Community surveys

No. survey forms completed in hard copy: 63

No. survey forms completed online: 25

Total 88 Intercept survey (face to face)

No. survey forms completed: 58

Business survey (paper and online)

No. survey forms completed: 29/46 (63% response rate)

Submissions to Council (Phase 1)

Email / letter submissions 15 (including a petition signed by 119 residents and accompanying letters from 21 residents)

“Concepts” Community Drop-In Session No. 3 Tuesday 13 May 2014, 6pm-8pm




Email / letter submissions 5

Public Briefing Session Wednesday 18 June 2014, 6pm-8pm



Email / letter submissions 1


In addition to these methods, a Community Reference Group involving representatives of the West

Oxford Street area was established and Council held meetings with this group on a number of

occasions. Further comments, emails and submissions were made by members of the community

directly to Council.


2.1 What were the key themes raised in participant feedback?

Community feedback from the consultation activities overall is summarised below. For further

details see the individual consultation outcome reports (Appendices A, B, C).

2.1.1 What people value about the West Oxford Street area

Respondents value numerous aspects of the West Oxford Street precinct. This includes:

» Access to shops, cafés and amenities within easy walking distance

» Proximity to Centennial Park and other open spaces

» Low rise ‘human scale’ and heritage character of the area

» Its open and sunny feel

» The strong sense of community

» Street life and local retail offering

» Proximity to public transport.

2.1.2 Key issues for the future of the area

Traffic and access

Improvements to address traffic and parking were frequently raised in feedback by members of

the community. Key issues raised by the community included:

» Traffic congestion on Oxford Street

» Functioning of the intersection of Oxford Street, York Road and Syd Einfield Drive

» Impacts of buses on traffic flow and amenity along Oxford Street

» Poor pedestrian and cycle links, particularly to Centennial Park but also in the wider area – with

a need for wider footpaths, a new cycle lane and improved sharing

> Pedestrian safety – conflicts with cyclists along footpaths along Oxford Street, particularly

around the bus depot

> Cyclist safety along Oxford Street, particularly with buses and vehicles at the York Road

intersection

» Lack of on street parking, with particular impacts for businesses and residents

» Speeding vehicles along Grafton Street

» Rat-running and congestion in residential streets.

A summary of the key issues raised is shown on the map over the page.

2 Consultation outcomes


Potential development of key sites within the study area

Scale of future development

» Many expressed a preference for any future development to be low rise or consistent with

height limits in the existing LEP.

» Many people stated that they did not want “high rise” development on these sites. Definitions

of high rise ranged from anything higher than two storeys to anything above eight storeys.

» Should reflect village feel of West Oxford Street area

» Concern about impacts of taller buildings on amenity and character (overshadowing, loss of

views, loss of heritage character).

Concerns about future redevelopment of Waverley bus depot

The majority of comments about future built form focused on the bus depot site. Key issues raised

in feedback included:

» Some concern about mixed messages relating to the future of this site

» Existing impacts of bus depot on neighbourhood (light spill, noise, fence)

» Many participants would like the site to retain its transport function

» If the bus depot site is redeveloped in future…suggested uses included:

> Enhance through-site connections for pedestrians and bike riders (from Oxford Street and St

James Reserve to Centennial Park)

> Community purposes (eg childcare, school)

> Sporting facilities (eg aquatic centre)

> Public spaces (eg community garden, sculpture park).

» Where residential development was suggested as a potential use, considerations focused on:

> Scale to be compatible with St James Road buildings / retain York Road heritage façade

> Consider potential impacts on amenity (eg overshadowing, loss of views, loss of visual

amenity)

> Consider potential conflicts between new residents / users of Centennial Park’s north east

corner.

Streetscape and amenity

Many participants identified streetscape and amenity as important elements of a precinct plan for

West Oxford Street. Key issues included:

» Preserve heritage buildings and items as important elements of the local area’s character

» Support and foster outdoor cafés and independent retail in the western end of Oxford Street as

these have a distinctive local feel that is different to other parts of Bondi Junction

» Maintain solar access to streets / public spaces

» Promote the area’s focus on health and sustainable lifestyles (health foods, organics, cycling)

» Update the western entry point to Oxford Street (public art, landscaping, traffic improvements)


» Any new development should provide a range of uses at ground level (not just more retail) and

contribute to streetscape through quality design.

Feedback on the Concepts / Ideas

All three concepts attracted a mix of positive comments and critical feedback. Many of the 42

respondents who completed a feedback form identified ideas from each of the three concepts that

they liked most, as well as ideas that they liked least. As shown in the table below, more than half

of all respondents (ie at least 23 out of 42) liked one or more of the ideas in each of the three

concepts.

Many participants identified positive aspects of the draft concepts. These included positive ideas

for:

» Addressing traffic congestion

» Improving pedestrian and cycle access in and around the study area

» Enhancing the public domain and streetscapes

» Attracting more people into the local area / contributing to more vibrant street life

» Providing new housing to accommodate population growth and change

Much of the critical feedback received on the draft concepts focused on:

» The level of development proposed – particularly around the ‘gateway’ to the western end of

Oxford Street. Some members of the community commented that the building heights proposed

in this location are out of context with the area and may set a precedent for future

development.

» The proposed building heights / density in the Simpson and Thalis concepts, with less concern

expressed in relation to the predominantly low rise Archrival concept. As noted previously,

many participants expressed support for any future development within the study area to be

within the existing height limits in the current LEP.

» Consideration of Waverley bus depot and Centennial Park by the design teams as part of the

charette process – with some members of the community suggesting these sites should not be

considered as part of the design ideas process.

» The need to consider potential impacts of further development, such as further amplification of

noise on Oxford Street, overshadowing of Centennial Park, additional cars on local roads.

» The need to consider access such as improved cycle access and future transport modes /

routes.


Comments on the consultation process

Many respondents expressed concern about the study and related consultation process. Key issues

included:

» Concerns about the drivers behind the precinct plan given the LEP and DCP were only recently

adopted (2012)

» Concern that members of the community should be able to participate in the design charette

» Concern that the planning / consultation process did not allow adequate time for community

input.

At each stage of the consultation process community feedback was taken on board and addressed

wherever possible by Council and the consultant team.


3.1 How has community feedback been used?

A large amount of detailed feedback was received through the various consultation activities

including:

» Phase 1 – “Ideas in the Park” and “Ideas in the Library” Community Drop-In Sessions, surveys

of residents, visitors and businesses, and submissions to Council.

» Phase 2 – Concepts Session, survey, and submissions to Council

» Phase 3 – Public Briefing and submissions to Council

Community feedback on the future of West Oxford Street Bondi Junction was considered by

Council and the three design teams as an important input to preparation of the draft design

concepts.

3.2 What are the next steps?

The consultation process has contributed numerous ideas and suggestions as part of the initial

steps in planning for the future of the Western end of Oxford Street Bondi Junction.

Following presentation of the concepts at the Public Briefing, the design concepts will be reviewed

by Council staff and the NSW Government Architect’s Office. A report identifying a series of ideas

and possible actions for the West Oxford Street area will be prepared and presented to Council on

19 August 2014. This report will consider community feedback obtained through the consultation

process, the work of the design teams and the strategic context.

If endorsed, the Council report will then go on public exhibition for a period of two months. This

extended timeframe is proposed to enable full public comment. Ongoing consultation will be

undertaken by Council as part of planning for the future of the local area.

3 Next steps


Appendices

A Consultation Outcomes Report: Phase One Report

B Consultation Outcomes: Concepts Session

C Consultation Outcomes: Public Briefing Session


A Consultation Outcomes Report: Phase One Report

West Oxford Street Precinct Plan – Consultation Outcomes Report: Phase 1

Consultation Outcomes Report: Phase 1

Client: Waverley Council

Date:

24 April 2014

Contact: Brendan Blakeley

[email protected]

9387-2600

Sydney

02 9387 2600

Level 6

332 – 342 Oxford Street

Bondi Junction NSW 2022

www.elton.com.au [email protected]

Sydney | Canberra | Darwin ABN 56 003 853 101

Prepared by Lucy Greig

Reviewed by Brendan Blakeley

Date 24 April 2014

Document name Report

Version 0

1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5

1.1 Consultation methods 5

1.2 Consultation outcomes 5

1.2.1 What people value about the precinct now 5

1.2.2 Key issues for the future 6

2 INTRODUCTION 8

2.1 This document 8

3 CONSULTATION METHODS 9

3.1 Snapshot 9

3.2 Process and collateral 10

3.3 Participation 10

4 CONSULTATION OUTCOMES – COMMUNITY SURVEY 13

4.1.1 West Oxford Street as a Place 13

4.1.2 Opportunities for the Future 16

5 CONSULTATION OUTCOMES – INTERCEPT SURVEY 23



6 CONSULTATION OUTCOMES – BUSINESS SURVEY 30



7 CONSULTATION OUTCOMES – SUBMISSIONS 37

8 INTERACTIVE EXERCISES 40

8.1 Enjoying your neighbourhood – Exercise 1 (Map and flags) 40

8.2 What sort of place do you want your neighbourhood to be? - Exercise 2 (Visual

survey) 43

8.3 Opportunities for the future - Exercise 3 (Post-it note comments) 50

Appendix A: Participant feedback to the project team

Appendix B: Display materials

Appendix C: Survey tools

Contents

4 West Oxford Street Precinct Plan – Consultation Outcomes Report: Phase 1 Elton Consulting

West Oxford Street Precinct Plan – Consultation Outcomes Report: Phase 1 Elton Consulting 5

This document has been prepared for Waverley Council by Elton Consulting. It provides an

overview of the first phase of the consultation process for the West Oxford Street Precinct Plan

study. The phase one consultation activities were conducted in March and April 2014.

1.1 Consultation methods

The consultation methods used in the first phase of the West Oxford Street Precinct Plan study are

summarised in Table 1.

Table 1 Snapshot of consultation methods – Phase 1

Activity Details


St James Reserve, Saturday 8 March 2014,

11am-1pm



“Ideas in the Library” Community Drop-In Session No. 2

Waverley Library, Thursday 3 April 2014,

5.30pm-7.30pm



Community surveys



Total 88 Intercept survey (face to face)




Submissions to Council


1.2 Consultation outcomes

1.2.1 What people value about the precinct now

Respondents value numerous aspects of the West Oxford Street precinct. This includes:

» Access to shops cafes and amenities

» Proximity to Centennial Park and other open spaces

» The low rise ‘human scale’ and heritage character of the area

» Open and sunny feel

» Strong sense of community

» Street life and local retail offering

1 Executive summary


» Proximity to public transport.

1.2.2 Key issues for the future

Traffic and access

Improvements to address traffic and parking were frequently raised in feedback. Key issues raised

by the community included:

» Traffic congestion in Oxford Street

» Functioning of the intersection of Oxford Street, York Road and Syd Einfield Drive

» Impacts of buses on traffic flow and amenity along Oxford Street

» Poor pedestrian and cycle links, particularly to Centennial Park but also in the wider area – with

a need for wider footpaths, a new cycle lane and improved sharing

> Pedestrian safety – conflicts with cyclists along footpaths along Oxford Street, particularly

around the bus depot

> Cyclist safety along Oxford Street, particularly with buses and vehicles at the York Road

intersection

» Lack of on street parking, with particular impacts for businesses and residents

» Speeding vehicles along Grafton Street

» Rat-running and congestion in residential streets.

Potential development

Scale of future development

Just over half of all residents who responded to the Community Survey (53%, 47), 31% of

respondents who took part in the Intercept Survey (18), and 17% of those who participated in the

Business Survey (5) expressed the view that any future development on key sites in the study area

should be low rise or consistent with the height limits in the current LEP.

Many people stated that they did not want “high rise” development on these sites. Definitions of

high rise ranged from anything higher than two storeys to anything above eight storeys.

Further feedback on built form included:

» Participants did not want to see a “canyon effect” of buildings continued down the length of

Oxford St

» Higher buildings were seen as not compatible with the village /neighbourhood feel of this end of

Oxford Street

» Concerns about the impacts of taller buildings on the amenity and character of the surrounding

low rise heritage buildings were frequently noted

Concerns about future redevelopment of Waverley bus depot

The majority of comments about future built form focused on the bus depot site. Key issues raised

in feedback included:

» Concern about mixed messages regarding the future of the bus depot

» Existing impacts of light spill noise and the barbed wire fence

» Many participants would like the site to retain its transport function

» If the bus depot was to be redeveloped suggested uses included:


> enhanced through site connections for pedestrians and bike riders – between the western

end of Oxford Street and Centennial Park and between St James Park and Centennial Park

> community purposes such as a primary school or childcare

> sporting facilities i.e. an aquatic centre

> public spaces such as piazza, park or community garden

» Where residential development was suggested as a potential use, this was generally qualified as

needing to be of a scale compatible with buildings in St James Road and the heritage façade of

the sheds along York Road.

» Potential impacts such as overshadowing, loss of visual amenity (from Bondi Junction and

Centennial Park), and loss of views

» Potential conflict between uses in the north east corner of Centennial Park and any future

residential use on the bus depot site

Streetscapes and amenity

Many participants in Phase 1 identified streetscapes and amenity as important elements of a

precinct plan for West Oxford Street. Key issues included:

» Heritage buildings are a defining element of the area’s character

» Support and foster the outdoor cafes and independent retail in the western end of Oxford

Street as these have a distinctive local feel that is quite different to other parts of the Junction

» Promote the area’s focus on health and lifestyle (including health foods, organic produce, cycle

and sustainability businesses / and close proximity to Centennial Park)

» Maintain sunlight to streets and public spaces

» Any new development should provide for a range of uses at ground level not just more shops

» Any new development should contribute to the streetscape through quality design

» Poor appearance of the eastern entry point to Oxford Street near the bus depot and hire car

yard

» Landscaping of triangle of land near Syd Einfield Drive and Woollahra Gates

» Noise from buses is not compatible with cafés and outdoor dining.

Process

Many respondents expressed concern about the study and related consultation process. Key issues

included:

» Concerns about the drivers behind the precinct plan given the LEP and DCP were only recently

adopted (2012)

» Concern that members of the community should be able to participate in the design charette.


2.1 This document

This document has been prepared for Waverley Council by Elton Consulting. It provides an

overview of the first phase of the consultation process for the West Oxford Street Precinct Plan

study. The phase one consultation activities were conducted in March and April 2014.

This report documents feedback obtained from members of the community who participated in the

consultation activities. It will be provided to Council for use in the next phase of the study.

Specifically, this document will be used as an input to the design charrette process that will be

conducted in May / June by Council, the NSW Government Architect’s Office and design teams.

Further community consultation will be undertaken as part of the next phase of the study around

the design charrette. This will include a third Community Drop-In Session where members of the

community will have an opportunity to review and comment on the draft concepts prepared by the

design teams, and a Public Briefing Session. The outcomes of the next phase of engagement will

be reported separately.

2 Introduction


3.1 Snapshot

The consultation methods used in the first phase of the West Oxford Street Precinct Plan study are

summarised in Table 2.

Table 2 Snapshot of consultation methods – Phase 1

Activity Details


St James Reserve, Saturday 8 March 2014, 11am-1pm


No. of participants who signed register: 80 (including 75 who said ‘yes’ to receiving

future information updates)

No. survey forms distributed: 141

No. post-it note comments: 42

No. comments on flags: 135 (including 66 green and 69 red flags)

“Ideas in the Library” Community Drop-In Session No. 2

Waverley Library, Thursday 3 April 2014,

5.30pm-7.30pm


No. of participants who signed register: 53 (including 34 who said ‘yes’ to receiving

future information updates)

No. survey forms distributed: 46

No. post-it note comments: 33

No. comments on flags: 46 (including 19 green and 27 red flags)

Community survey



Total 88

Intercept survey (face to face)




Submissions to Council


3 Consultation methods


3.2 Process and collateral

The consultation process for the West Oxford Street precinct plan was designed to provide

numerous opportunities for participation by members of the community. The consultation process

was supported by the following collateral:

» Information about the project on Council’s website

» Display materials at the two Community Drop-In Sessions

» Information sheet distributed to local residents via letterbox drop and at the second Community

Drop-In Session.

It should be noted that the project website and materials were updated during the first phase of

the study, to support informed participation within the community. This included:

» Updating the display boards for use in the second Community Drop In Session

> to clearly state that the outcomes of the study could possibly result in changes to the

current planning controls, depending on the results of the study and nature of the draft

concept/s

> to include images of higher density buildings on the visual survey

> to include space for participants to add explanatory comments on the visual survey

» Updating the survey tools

> to clearly state that the outcomes of the study could possibly result in changes to the

current planning controls, depending on the results of the study and nature of the draft

concept/s.

3.3 Participation

The consultation process demonstrated a high level of interest and participation in the West Oxford

Street study from within the local community. It involved a wide range of people from within the

local community including residents of Bondi Junction and Woollahra, local business owners and

employees, and visitors to the precinct.

Information sessions and community survey

The Community Drop-In Sessions were attended by a total of approximately 260 people. The

Community Survey was distributed at these sessions and was also available on Council’s website. A

total of 63 people took part in the paper survey and another 25 completed the survey online

(n=88). A profile of survey respondents is provided here.

Which of the following best describes you?

The majority of respondents who completed the Community Survey were residents of Bondi

Junction (79). Other respondents were:

» Residents of Woollahra (1) and Queens Park (1)

» Worker from business in Bondi Junction (1)

» Owner/operator from business in Bondi Junction (2).


What is your age group?

Most respondents (52%, 45) were aged 36-55 years.

Gender

Responses to the Community Survey were received from a balance of men (38) and women (45).

Intercept survey

The intercept survey was completed by a total of 58 respondents. Respondents included a mix of

local residents and visitors to the West Oxford Street area. A profile of survey respondents is

provided here.

Which of the following best describes you?

Most respondents who took part in the intercept / visitor survey were residents of Bondi Junction

(22) or Woollahra (18). Others included residents of the wider local area, workers and business

owners and others.


What is your age group?

As in the Community Survey, most respondents were aged 36-55 years.

Gender

Participants comprised a mix of men (24) and women (34).

Business survey

A total of 29 respondents completed the Business Survey, from a total of approximately 46

businesses within the study area – a response rate of 63%.

Submissions

A total of 15 submissions were received by Waverley Council in relation to the West Oxford Street

study. Two of these submissions were made by groups or organisations and the remainder were

made by individual members of the community.


The results of the Community Survey are presented in this section of the report. A total of 88

respondents completed the Community Survey – including 63 hard copies of the survey and 25

responses that were completed online. The survey results are outlined here.

Where relevant, participant comments made during the two Community Drop-In Sessions are

also discussed (and an overall record of these is provided in Appendix A).

4.1.1 West Oxford Street as a Place

What do you like most about the West Oxford Street precinct as a place to live,

work or visit?

Responses to this open-ended question are shown above. Commonly identified aspects of the West

Oxford Street precinct that respondents ‘like most’ were:

» Access to shops, cafes and amenities within easy walking distance (53)

» Proximity to Centennial Park and other open spaces in the local area (49)

» The low rise nature and heritage character of the area (47)

» The strong sense of community (38)

» Access to public transport (22)

» Other factors, such as peace and quiet, street lighting, homes with trees and gardens, safe feel

at night (20)

» Proximity to the city, beaches and other infrastructure such as schools and hospitals (17).

4 Consultation outcomes – Community survey


What do you see as the most important aspects of the ‘character and identity’

of the West Oxford Street area?

Please note, online survey responses not included for this question.

Responses to this open-ended question are shown above. Respondents highly value the low

rise / heritage character of the West Oxford Street precinct (56).

Other aspects of the area’s character and identity that are valued by respondents include:

» The walkability of the neighbourhood / its village feel (30)

» The parks, gardens and trees in the area (20)

» The area’s community feel (15)

» The proximity to Bondi Junction (centre), yet distinct character and feel of West Oxford Street

(11)

» The area’s amenity (eg its pleasant feel, quiet atmosphere and views) (8).

A selection of comments from survey respondents is provided below.

Listen to and work with the locals who have preserved and cared for this historic area, and kept it a safe

area to live – a family area. East Bondi Junction is now high-rise. Do not let it happen in West Oxford

Street.

Establishing Bondi Junction as a clean, healthy, heritage focused area is key…


How do you like to spend time in the West Oxford Street area (aside from when you’re at home or work)?

Respondents like to spend time in the West Oxford Street area doing a wide range of activities.

Aside from being at home or work, people like to:

» Enjoy the outdoors (75)

» Go walking (75)

» Go to cafes and restaurants (65)

» Go shopping (41)

» Go bike riding (34)

» Do a range of other activities (21).

During the Community Drop-In Sessions, participants discussed what it is they value about

the West Oxford Street area, what they see as its character and identity, and how they like to

use the area. The study area was described by many as being distinct from the eastern end

of Oxford Street, with key attributes including its greenery and parks (including nearby

Centennial Park) and low scale heritage character. The strong sense of community, strip

shopping, sunny aspect and easy access to transport and Bondi Junction centre were also

valued by many.


4.1.2 Opportunities for the Future

What are some of the opportunities for improvement that you’d like to see realised in the West Oxford Street area?

Please note, online survey responses not included for this question.

Respondents were invited to provide feedback on the precinct plan as an opportunity to think

strategically about the future of the West Oxford Street precinct – over the next 5, 10 and 20

years.

Responses to this closed-ended (tick a box) question are shown above. Improvements to the

public domain (such as upgrading footpaths, lighting, public seating, plantings, trees,

public art) was the most common response to this question (51).

Each of the other response options presented in the survey attracted numerous responses, as

shown above.

The next most popular opportunities for improvement were:

» Improved traffic arrangements / flow (33)

» Improved entry point to Bondi Junction from the West (32)

» Improved pedestrian access between Oxford Street Bondi Junction and Centennial

Park (31).


Which of the above are most important to you?

When asked to nominate their three most important improvements, the most commonly identified

first preference was improvements to the public domain (12).

This was followed by improved traffic arrangements / flow (7) and improved access for bike riders between Oxford Street and Centennial Park (6). Other first preferences are shown above.

Many participants at the Community Drop-In Sessions commented on the need for

improvements to address traffic and access issues in and around the study area. Key issues

included the need to address existing traffic congestion and speeding, to improve pedestrian

and cycle connections and safety, and to improve access to parking in the precinct. Many

participants expressed concern about increased traffic and parking impacts relating to any

future development within the study area.

A number of participants also identified opportunities to improve the public domain –

through both small and larger scale changes. Suggestions included providing more garbage

bins, seating and public art, improving signage and wayfinding, supporting revitalisation of

local shops and businesses, and providing more public space areas within the study area.

Several participants commented that additional facilities and services would be required to

meet the needs of the local community if future development takes place within the study

area.



Leaving it alone would be preferable but if development does occur, keeping it within planning

controls would be optimal, as it will retain some character as opposed to east Oxford Street, which

has been and is still being brutalised by high-rise development beyond controls due in part to VPAs.

I think there is a real opportunity to open this up as the green/healthy precinct of Bondi

Junction, by diverting traffic and building the development underground, and opening up the current

depot as a park that links Bondi to Centennial Park.

It [West Oxford Street] does NOT need a grand entrance, its needs more greening and less traffic.

The intersection of York Road, Oxford Street and Ocean Street needs to be more functional. Perhaps

more of a tunnel and bridge arrangement [should be established] rather than traffic lights.

A cul-de-sac at the junction of Grafton and Leswell Streets is a small change that would make a huge

difference to the residents living between Nelson Street and Leswell Street.

This is an opportunity for Council to create an iconic entry into Bondi Junction from the West.


Over time, there is likely to be interest from landowners in upgrading or

developing sites in the West Oxford Street precinct. If this occurs, what type of

land uses (eg mix of retail, commercial, residential, other uses) and built form

would be appropriate for future development on these sites?

Table 2 Survey responses (n=81)

Response No. responses (multiple responses possible)

Types of use

Uses - Residential 17

Uses - Cafes / restaurants / retail 19

Uses - Commercial / office space 12

Uses - Mix of uses (eg as at present) 12

Uses - Parks and open space areas 5

Uses - Increased activation at different times of day / night 1

Subtotal 60 Types of built form

Built form - Height limits - Development within current LEP height limits (ie 9.5m or up to approx. 3 storeys on the bus depot site) / "No high rise" development / Low rise development

47

Built form - Heritage - Development to respect heritage character of local area

9

Built form - Amenity - Development to: maximise solar access, privacy, etc (eg through stepped design); minimise impacts

6

Built form - Other provisions (eg new development to: provide onsite parking, use appropriate materials/finishes, contribute to streetscape through quality design, etc)

3

Built form - Height limits - Development may be slightly higher than existing LEP height limits

1

Subtotal 66 Other factors

Traffic and parking improvements 3

Public domain improvements (eg upgrade local streets, improve access for pedestrians, etc)

3

Other 5

Subtotal 11

Some responses to this question focused on either the appropriate future land uses or built form

for the West Oxford Street area. Other responses discussed both land uses and built form. A small

number of respondents also discussed other factors to be considered in relation to appropriate

future development within the precinct.

Responses about future land uses (60) varied – with some respondents expressing a preference

for any future development within the precinct to be residential, while others had a preference for

retail / cafes (19), mixed use (12), or commercial / office uses (6). A small number responded that

more parks and open space areas would be appropriate (5).

In comments about future built form (47), most focused on building heights. Appropriate future

development in the study area was generally described as being within the current LEP height

limits (ie 9.5m or up to approximately 3 storeys on the bus depot site). Comments included "No

high rise" and "No towers". Some respondents commented that any future development should be

low rise, but did not make reference to specific maximum building heights.


Do you have any other ideas or suggestions for improving the West Oxford

Street precinct?

Other ideas and suggestions for improving the precinct focused on limiting the scale of future

development (24 responses), improving traffic and parking (17 responses), preserving the heritage character of the local area (9), and other responses as shown above.

The nature of appropriate and inappropriate built form for the study area was explored in

discussions with a number of participants during the Community Drop-In Sessions. Many

commented that any future development within the study area should be consistent with

the existing LEP and DCP and there was strong opposition to ‘high rise’ development within

the precinct.

There were a range of perspectives on what constituted ‘high rise’ development. This was

described by some participants as anything higher than two storeys, by others as anything

higher than the maximum heights identified in the LEP (eg up to three storeys on the bus

depot site), and by a smaller number of participants - as anything over five, six, seven or

eight storeys.

Many participants also commented on the importance of quality design that is sympathetic

to the local context and heritage character of the area. Maintaining the amenity of nearby

residential areas, parks and cafes (ie maintaining views and solar access, and providing for

any additional traffic and parking needs) was raised as an important consideration for any

future development within the precinct.


Are there any particular issues you think Council needs to consider in planning

for the future of this area?

Particular issues to be considered by Council in planning for the future of the area were:

» Limit the scale of future development / ensure building heights are sensitive to the

character of the surrounding area (18)

» Improve traffic and parking management (15)

» Preserve the heritage character of the area (12)

» Minimise potential impacts on the existing community (eg maintain solar access, views, privacy)

(9)

» Continue to consult with the local community in planning for this area (8)

» Other issues (7)

» Preserve / increase parks and open space and improve links between West Oxford Street and

Centennial Park for pedestrians and bike riders (7)

» Consider new community facilities (eg childcare centre, school, recreational facilities) (6).



Development needs to be in keeping with the heritage character of the area and should not

overshadow neighbouring properties. Development also needs to link Centennial Park to the Oxford

Street area.

Low rise development no more than three storeys. Residential development only. There is no parking

available for commercial/retail development.

I think it is important the current plan is followed. High rise development will damage the current

sense of village that is developing around this area and create another impersonal environment

overwhelmed with too many residents and traffic.

The height profile should slope down from a peak at Westfield to no more than the height of the bus

depot buildings adjacent to Centennial Park. Along Oxford Street low key commercial is appropriate

but not commercial that will bring a dramatic increase in traffic to the area.

I think creating more of a village vibe would be great, LANDSCAPE, encourage restaurants/mix of

retail and fix up the traffic issues. Improve the [bus depot] facade, and allow for some

redevelopment but within limitations. Respect the people and owners already living in the area. Also,

I think the residents in the area need to be better protected from the business of the bus depot, a

higher dividing wall, protection from noise and light pollution. The flow of traffic in and around the

depot should also be considered.

Encourage improvement in area but it must blend with the neighbourhood and not impact on the

environment and families. Also study traffic on Oxford St. It is very difficult for children to cross the

roads to school and dangerous for pedestrians and bike riders to navigate down Oxford St. ie improve

Oxford Street for walking traffic and bike riders.

The bus depot could be a wonderful community with enough underground parking, gardens and

buildings of four to five storeys. The development of the bus depot should include shops and cafes as

well as buildings of interest.

We absolutely adore living here. This is an opportunity for Council to link Centennial Park to the West

Oxford Street Precinct. This is not occurring now because the bus depot is in the way. Please don’t

waste this fantastic opportunity by exclusively appealing to property developers.

Every effort should be made to stop the State Government from selling off the bus depot to the

highest bidder. It would inevitably lead to high rise developments. The risk is real and the Barangaroo

Casino, Bronte RSL and Meriton apartments over Bondi Junction train stations are recent, regrettable

examples.

The streets of Bondi Junction are over capacity for traffic. Any development must be residential, low

rise and in keeping with the heritage conservation area adjacent. No overshadowing which will reduce

the amenity of people’s homes and facilitate mould and damp.

Don't submit changes or applications to change the family / residential nature of the area.

Development must be well balanced and only occur where needed.


What’s the main reason for your visit to Bondi Junction today?

Most respondents who took part in the intercept survey were visiting Bondi Junction to go

shopping (18), to visit a café or restaurant (15), or to do other activities such as walk the dog,

catch the bus, visit family, drop the kids off at school (15).

Are there any other reasons for your visit to Bondi Junction today?

When considering both the primary and secondary reasons for visiting the study area, most

respondents were visiting Bondi Junction to go shopping (38), to visit a café or restaurant (30), or

to do other activities. Others had come to use local services, to go to work, home, enjoy the

outdoors, or were just passing through.

5 Consultation outcomes – Intercept survey


Approximately how long will you spend in this part of Bondi Junction today?

There was a fairly even split between respondents who intended to spend under 30 minutes in the

West Oxford Street area, and those who planned to spend one or more hours. This suggests that

survey respondents included a mix of people who use the precinct for different purposes.

In the last month how often have you visited Bondi Junction?

The majority of respondents had visited Bondi Junction on a daily basis (30) or several times a

week (16), suggesting that they have a good understanding of the area.



What do you like most about the study area as a place to live, work or visit?

Responses to this open-ended question are shown above. Commonly identified aspects of the West Oxford Street precinct that respondents ‘like most’ were:


» Proximity to the city, beaches and other infrastructure such as schools and hospitals

(16 responses)

» Proximity to Centennial Park and other open spaces in the local area (14 responses)



» Other factors, such as peace and quiet, street lighting, homes with trees and gardens, safe feel

at night (7)

» Access to public transport (5).


What are the most important aspects of the ‘character and identity’ of the

study area to you?

Responses to this open-ended question are shown above.

Aspects of the area’s character and identity that are valued by respondents include:


» Other aspects (14)

» The area’s community feel (13)

» The low rise / heritage character of the precinct (13)

» The parks, gardens and trees in the area (6)

» The proximity to Bondi Junction (centre), yet distinct character and feel of West Oxford Street

(4)

» The area’s amenity (eg its pleasant feel, quiet atmosphere and views) (3).



What are some of the opportunities for improvement that you’d like to see realised in the study area?

Responses to this closed-ended (tick a box) question are shown above. Other improvements

(such as improving community safety on weekend evenings, improve train and bus services,

address homelessness, improve safety for bike riders, improve maintenance of public domain) was

the most common response to this question (26 responses). This was followed by improved traffic

arrangements/flow (25 responses) and improvements to the public domain including local streets,

laneways and parks (20 responses). Each of the other response options presented in the survey

attracted numerous responses, as shown above.




first preference was improvements to the public domain (12). This was followed by improved

traffic arrangements / flow (7), and improved access for bike riders between Oxford Street and

Centennial Park (6).


developing sites in the study area. If this occurs, what type of land uses (eg

mix of retail, commercial, residential, other uses) and buildings would be

appropriate for future development on these sites?



Types of use

Uses - Residential 8



Uses - Parks and open space areas 1

Uses - Increased activation at different times of day / night 1


Built form - Height limits - Development within current LEP height limits (ie 9.5m or up to approx. 3 storeys on bus depot site) / "No high rise" development / Low rise development

18

Built form - Heritage - Development to respect heritage character of local area

2

Built form - Amenity - Development to: maximise solar access, privacy, etc (eg through stepped design); minimise impacts

2

Built form - Other provisions (eg new development to: provide onsite parking, use appropriate materials/finishes, contribute to streetscape through

quality design, etc)

1


0


Traffic and parking improvements 0

Public domain improvements (eg upgrade local streets, improve access for pedestrians, etc)

2

Other 4

Subtotal 6

As in the Community Survey, some responses to this question focused on either the appropriate

future land uses or built form for the West Oxford Street area. Other responses discussed both

land uses and built form. A small number of respondents also discussed other factors to be

considered in relation to appropriate future development within the precinct.

Responses about future land uses (33) varied – with some respondents expressing a preference

for any future development within the precinct to be residential (8), with others had a preference

for cafes / restaurants / retail (17), and others were supportive of a mix of uses (6).

In comments about future built form (23), most focused on building heights (18). Appropriate

future development was generally described as being “low rise” or “low density” with “no towers”.

Public domain improvements and other factors were also thought to be important considerations

for any future development within the precinct.


Do you have any other ideas or suggestions for improving the study area?

Other ideas and suggestions for improving the precinct focused on improving traffic and

parking (10), supporting local shops and cafes / activating the study area (8), improving access for pedestrians and bike riders (8), and a range of other responses as shown above.

A selection of comments is provided below.

The West Oxford Street precinct needs more public spaces for people to enjoy their lunch and

to socialise.

Improve way-finding in the area – people struggle to orient themselves.

Bondi Junction has a history of ongoing development with local studies including: Hope Farm, Last

Windmill and the Boot Factory. Reference the area's history in future developments.

Make West Oxford Street more visually appealing.

Wider footpaths, more outdoor seating for cafes, no fines for garage sales.

No advertising at bus stops - this creates dangerous blind corners. Don't develop the Bus Depot.

Parking is dangerous on St. James Road.

The West Oxford Street precinct needs improvement. [Address] safety in Oxford Street mall.



What do you like most about doing business in the study area?

Responses to this open-ended question are shown above. Commonly identified aspects of the West

Oxford Street precinct that respondents ‘like most’ about doing business in the area were:



» Favourable traffic flow within the local area (10)

» Proximity to the city, beaches and other infrastructure such as schools and hospitals (9)

» Specialist stores / health and lifestyle focus within the precinct (6)

» Other (3)

» Access to public transport (2).

6 Consultation outcomes – Business Survey


What are the most important aspects of the ‘character and identity’ of the study area to you?

Responses to this open-ended question are shown above. Respondents highly value the

community feel of the West Oxford Street precinct as an important aspect of its

character and identity (5).

Other aspects of the area’s character and identity that are valued by respondents include:

» The availability of parking (4)

» Other (4)


» Specialist stores / health and lifestyle focus of the precinct (3)

» Accessibility (3)

» Cleanliness (3)


» Proximity to amenities, the city, public transport (3)

» The parks, gardens and trees in the area (1).


Change Bondi Junction from soulless shopping to something that has a permanent cultural voice.

Organic, eco-friendly, health focus.


What are the main factors that attract people to this area?

Businesses identified the main factors that attract people to the West Oxford Street area as:

» It’s walkability (19)

» Shopping (17)

» Cafes and restaurants (15)

» Enjoyment of the outdoors (11)

» Pleasant environment (10)

» Accessibility for bike riders (9)

» Other factors (5).



What are some of the opportunities for improvement that you’d like to see realised in the study area?

Opportunities for improvement identified by businesses include:

» Improved parking arrangements (20)

» Improvements to the entry point to Bondi Junction from the west (16)

» Improved pedestrian access between the precinct and: Woollahra (15) / Centennial

Park (14)

» Improvements to the public domain including local streets, laneways and parks (15)

» Other responses as identified above.




first preference was improved parking arrangements (8 respondents). This was followed by

improvements to the public domain (2), improved entry point to Oxford Street Bondi Junction from the west (1) and less impact of traffic on people using streets / cafes (1).


developing sites in the study area. If this occurs, what type of land uses (eg

mix of retail, commercial, residential, other uses) and buildings would be

appropriate for future development on these sites?



Types of use




Built form - Height limits - Development within current LEP height limits (ie 9.5m or up to approx. 3 storeys on bus depot site) / "No high rise" development / Low rise development

5


2


Other 1

Subtotal 1

As in the Community and Intercept surveys, some responses to this question focused on either the

appropriate future land uses or built form for the West Oxford Street area. Other responses

discussed both land uses and built form.

In responses about future land uses (18) respondents expressed a preference for any future

development within the precinct to be mixed use (11) or cafes / restaurants / retail (7).


In comments about future built form (7), most focused on building heights (5). Appropriate

future development was generally described as being “low rise” or within current LEP height limits.

However a couple of participants (2) commented that future development in the precinct could be

slightly higher than the current maximum building heights.

Do you have any other ideas or suggestions for improving the study area – to

cater for the needs of businesses?

Other ideas and suggestions for improving the area to cater for the needs of businesses focused

on:

» Improvements to traffic and parking (5)

» Local business initiatives – such as place activation strategies, new shops, an improved

offering by existing businesses (3)

» A range of other suggestions as shown above.


My business does not rely on walk ins…I do know businesses suffer ups and downs along Oxford Street.

The gateway entry to Bondi Junction…I believe this needs to be addressed and improved with support from

the community and business working together….It is worn down, old looking with no excitement…

Short term parking for delivery and pickup vans like Spring Street near Easts Leagues Club.


Are there any particular issues you think Council needs to consider in planning for the future of this area?

Particular issues that businesses identified for consideration by Council in planning for the future of

the area were:

» Traffic and parking (12)

» Scale of the built environment (4)

» Streetscapes and amenity (3)

» A range of other issues as shown above.


Replace bus depot with a museum or school….swimming pool or sports centre…cultural centre or open air

sculpture park.

Maintain ease of traffic flow and parking.

Improve access for retail deliveries.


A total of 15 submissions were received by Waverley Council in relation to the West Oxford Street

study. Two of these submissions were made by groups or organisations and the remainder were

made by individual members of the community.

The group submissions were:

» A petition signed by 119 members of the local community and copies of an accompanying letter

signed by 21 members of the community

» A submission from Centennial Parklands.

Submission No.1 – Local residents

» Signed petition from 119 residents from the study area and surrounds expressing opposition to

development in the West Oxford Street Precinct that does not:

> comply with the existing LEP

> retain existing homes including some heritage homes along Grafton Street

> involve residents in the design charrette process.

» Accompanying letter from 21 members of the community seeking:

> for the design charette process to work within the existing 2012 LEP

> preservation of historic homes and amenity, including terraces in Leswell Street, historic

homes in Grafton Street and the Mill Hill heritage area

> resident participation in the design charette process.

Submission No.2 – Centennial Parklands

» Letter from Centennial Parklands noting that it has no in principle objection to the West Oxford

Street Precinct Plan and supports the study’s general objectives to strengthen and enliven the

western end of Bondi Junction.

» Should there be any proposal to significantly increase residential density on the Waverley Bus

Depot site, Centennial Parklands would be very concerned. That is, high rise buildings on this

part of the Park would diminish its amenity and enjoyment by park users.

» The introduction of a large number of new residents adjacent to the northeast corner of the

Park would potentially raise some difficult management issues for Centennial Parklands. The

Trust has recently upgraded the Belvedere Amphitheatre to enhance its capacity to cater for

additional, larger and more diverse events. A skate facility is recommended for the Park’s

northeast corner as identified in the recently completed Centennial Park Master Plan. These

activities are expected to produce some amenity impacts such as noise, light, traffic and

parking, but were considered suitable uses for this section of the Park as there are limited

residential areas nearby.

7 Consultation outcomes – Submissions


» Centennial Parklands seeks:

> That Council brings to the attention of any prospective developer the broader context of the

site, particularly potential future impacts from park activities on new residents.

> That any subsequent planning approval for such a development should contain conditions on

the design of buildings so as to mitigate these impacts.

Submission No.3

» Seeks more inclusive process of community consultation – through community involvement in

all discussions and meetings.

Submission No.4

» Opposed to any change in the 2012 WLEP and high rise development in the study area

» Seeks full involvement by residents in the planning process and all meetings.

Submission No.5

» Concerned about changing 2012 WLEP, on the grounds that it provides a recent ‘well thought

out’ long term strategy for the development of the area

» Concerned about further commercialisation outside of Bondi Junction commercial centre

» Seeks full involvement of residents in all meetings and design charette.

Submission No.6

» Concerned about potential for development in the western end of Bondi Junction above existing

height limits

» Opposed to Waverley Bus Depot and ‘Pillars of Hercules’ high rise buildings

» Feels the study process is being rushed.

Submission No.7

» Concerned that increased development will have a negative impact on existing traffic

congestion

» Opposed to high rise residential and more office space

» Supports more day care and a new primary school.

Submission No.8

» Highlights lack of night life in Bondi Junction

» Would like any future development in the study area to be ‘pretty’ and not an eyesore

» Suggests restaurants and markets are appropriate uses.


Submission No.9

» Concerned about high rise development

» Seeks for the inclusion of open space and recreational space

» Concerned about parking and traffic congestion

» Supports preservation of heritage items such as old tram sheds

Submission No.10

» Makes suggestions about how the local road network could be changed to improve access for

motorists and cyclists

» Makes suggestions about potential future development on the bus depot site

» Opposed to high rise buildings in the study area

» Supports preservation of heritage and character of neighbourhood

Submission No.11

» Seeks for residents to be involved in all three of the design charette sessions

» Questions about the planning process and consultation

Submission No.12

» Opposed to any change to 2012 LEP

» Requests that the Design Charette is conducted within the current LEP provisions for height and

bulk.

Submission No.13

» Questions and concerns about the planning process and how

these relate to the 2012 WLEP

» Concerned about “investigations into possible future light rail

connections” and concern that the planning team does not

include suitably qualified personnel

» Questions and concerns about the inclusion of Waverley Bus

Depot in the study area

» Concerned about lack of recognition of heritage buildings in

the area (eg no heritage architect on the project team).

Submission No.14

» Concerned about pressure on capacity of critical services

in the area, particularly public schools.

Submission No.15

» Concerned that bus stop adjacent to Waverley Bus

Depot does not have see-through windows on each side,

potentially causing a safety hazard for pedestrians with

passing cyclists. See images opposite.


The Community Drop-In Sessions incorporated a series of interactive exercises in order to provide participants with a range of opportunities to have their say as part of the Phase 1 consultation

process. These activities provide an alternative for way of providing input to the planning process for members of the community who may not wish to complete a survey, make a submission or

share their views with the project team (or can be used to capture additional input from survey

respondents etc).

Participant feedback in response to the interactive exercises – visual survey, map and flags, post-it note comments – is discussed in this section of the report.

8.1 Enjoying your neighbourhood – Exercise 1 (Map and flags)

People who took part in the Community Drop-In Sessions were invited to mark the places and

activities that they enjoy most / don’t enjoy in their neighbourhood.

Feedback during Community Drop-In Session 1:

8 Interactive exercises


Feedback from both sessions

Green flags: Describe the places and activities you enjoy spending time in your

neighbourhood and tell us why

A total of 85 green flags were added to the map by participants in Sessions 1 (66) and 2 (19).

Commonly raised topics on green flags included:

» Preserve and respect the heritage character of the area

» Support and enhance the existing community feel

» Make the most of the pleasant environment / sunny aspect

» Improve connections to Centennial Park, retain and enhance local green spaces.

Red flags: Are there aspects of the West Oxford Street area that you’d like to see

improved? Please tell us how / why.

A total of 96 red flags were added to the map by participants in Sessions 1 (69) and 2 (27).

Commonly raised topics on red flags included:

» Existing traffic and parking issues within the precinct, and concern for increased impacts

relating to future development

» The need for improved access for pedestrians and bike riders within / through the precinct

» Some concerns about impacts (such as light and noise) relating to the existing bus depot site

» A preference for any future development within the precinct to be low rise / consistent with the

existing planning controls, and to minimise impacts on the surrounding community and park

Comments made on red and green flags have been documented and shown on a map of the study

area. Click here to view detailed comments on the map.

https://mapsengine.google.com/map/edit?hl=en&authuser=0&mid=z1SWGAuf8MfU.kKmMaWI3FDmo

Given the large volume of comments made in relation to traffic and access issues in and around the study area, these comments have are also presented in summary form on

a map of the study area (see over page).




8.2 What sort of place do you want your neighbourhood to be? - Exercise 2 (Visual survey)

People who took part in the Community Drop-In Sessions were invited to consider and comment

on a series of images showing different aspects of the West Oxford Street precinct and surrounds.

Green dots were used to identify aspects of the area that people value most and would like to see

retained into the future. Red dots were used to show aspects of the area that people do not like

and or that could be improved.

The visual survey display board was updated ahead of Session No. 2 in response to community feedback in Session No. 1 – to incorporate two new images (of existing medium and higher density

buildings in Bondi Junction) and to provide space for participant comments.

Feedback from Community Drop-In Sessions 1 and 2 is provided over the page.


Further detailed comments from Session No. 2 are shown here.

Comments:

» Green is good

» Keep the trees and park as they contribute to the streetscape

» Some participants sought benches, more lighting and BBQs. Whereas others thought these

amenities were already provided in nearby St James Reserve.

» Many commented that this photo was taken on a good day, and that this space is poorly

maintained and under utilised.

» Need to keep the park clean.

» The bus depot wall is ugly. Better noise/visual protection from the depot is required.

Comments*:

» This crossing is bad, unreliable and you have to wait a long time for the green light as a

pedestrian

» The footpath is narrow and dangerous

» The road is dangerous, which forces cyclists onto the pedestrian paths

» Bikes need to share the road on Oxford Street better

» Want bike lanes through to the end of Centennial Park

» Need a strategy for shared bike/pedestrian/car use throughout area

» Against bikes riding on pavement

» You should be able to turn right onto Oxford Street from York Road

» The sign directing people to Westfield down Grafton Street needs to change – these houses are

already between two major roads, which makes it worse for residents

» This specific bus stop needs to go, as its located in a dangerous spot


Comments:

» Surf boards need to go – the whole entrance is ugly

Comments:

» Like cafes, need more of this type of business

Comments:

» Like “cottage” style heritage homes as they reflect the history and character of the area

See also comments above*.

Comments:

» Like the heritage shop fronts and want to see them retained

» Need to encourage more revitalisation of the shops

» Need to discourage people from setting up business types that “would never succeed”

» Want more cafes

» Keep heritage buildings on Grafton Street

» Road quality is poor at this end of Oxford Street


» Right turns into St James Road and other streets nearby should not be allowed

Comments:

» Like retention of the heritage façade

» Like low rise development (up to 3 storeys) as it retains the character of the local community

» Like vertical gardens

» Dislike the street frontage of contemporary building / does not blend with surroundings

» Some described this building as “cheap and nasty”

» Some commented that the “style” of this building makes it a poor development, rather than the

building height


8.3 Opportunities for the future - Exercise 3 (Post-it note comments)

People who took part in the Community Drop-In Sessions were invited to provide feedback on

what they see as some of the opportunities that could be realised in the study area – either

in response to the questions shown on the display board – or in relation to their particular area/s

of interest. A total of 42 post-it note comments were made in Session 1 and another 33 were made

in Session 2.

Feedback from Community Drop-In Session 1:


Feedback from Community Drop-In Session 2:

Feedback from both sessions

A summary of responses is shown here. Responses have been grouped under each of the

questions shown on this display board.

1. What makes West Oxford Street a special place? How would you describe the vibe or

identity of the neighbourhood?

Session 1:

» Human scale, sunny village area

» A good balance of open space, high rise, low rise, shops, restaurants and services respectful

» Pedestrian access is excellent

Session 2:

» Human scale.

2. Are there any small changes that could make a big difference to the area?

Session 1:

» Upgrade footpaths

» Increase occupancy of empty shops, more restaurants for evening use

» More trees

» More bins in parks

» Increased occupancy of empty retail sites


» Sensor lighting

Session 2:

» Too much traffic congestion on West Grafton Street between Nelson Street and Leswell.

» Have a cul-de-sac at corner of Grafton and Leswell to stop traffic.

» Move Westfield sign out of Nelson Street to Leswell Street.

» Parking for residents is always difficult in Ruthven Street. Helpful to mark off spaces to

maximise spots. Congestion increases monthly. Mill Hill Road also hard to park.

» Place a hump on Leswell Street to slow down traffic.

» High rise buildings create a wind tunnel. Cities should be more ‘human’. Human scale. Irregular

development to provide opportunity for public space.

» Opportunity to extend mixed use zone east side of subject area to the commercial pocket of

Grafton Street.

» Preserve terrace houses in quiet streets. Maintain facades of buildings if redeveloping on Oxford

Street.

3. Are there any activities you’d like to be able to do in the future, that you can’t do

now?

Session 1:

» Increase the amount of retail in the West Oxford Street Precinct.

» Increase the occupancy of empty shops on Oxford Street.

» Reserve Oxford Street exclusively for commercial use/ensure that commercial land use does not

encroach on residential areas.

» I want to ride my bicycle to work and safely in the area to the beach

» Would like more cycle paths and access

» Light rail

» Lighting so walking through the mall late is safe

» All resident representatives should be involved in all design charrettes and the formulation of

design concepts

Session 2:

» How about more visual beauty and activities that aren’t just more retail / residential!

» Expand scope of map and integrate with bordering Councils. Plan to look at long term vision

over 30 years with migration process to realise 5-10 year phases.


4. Over time, there is likely to be interest from landowners in upgrading or developing

sites in the West Oxford Street Precinct. What type of land uses (eg mix of retail,

commercial, residential, other uses) and built form would be appropriate for future

development on these sites?

Session 1:

Building heights (19 responses – as summarised below):

» No high rise development in the West Oxford Street Precinct.

» No changes to the Floor Space Ratio (FSR) as established in the Waverley LEP 2012.

» Development of the West Oxford Street Precinct should occur on a human scale.

» Concerns regarding overshadowing of the West Oxford Street Precinct, particularly in winter

where the sun is low in the sky.

» High rise development raises privacy concerns where overlooking may become an issue.

» Objection to development that overlooks Centennial Park.

Urban design considerations (15 responses – as summarised below):

» Further development must be sensitive to the heritage of the West Oxford Street Precinct.

» Increase the number of street trees within the West Oxford Street Precinct.

» Upgrade/improve the footpaths within the West Oxford Street Precinct.

» Provide a greater number of rubbish bins in the West Oxford Street Precinct.

» Improve street lighting within the West Oxford Street Precinct.

» Explore moving the bus depot to another location.

Population density/overcrowding concerns (8 responses – as summarised below):

» Increased residential zoning will further exacerbate issues arising from a high population

density.

» An increasing population density in the West Oxford Street precinct is making parking

increasingly difficult/ parking provision is undersupplied/parking must be considered as a part of

any future developments.

» The increasing population of the West Oxford Street Precinct is increasing traffic volumes.

» The West Oxford Street Precinct requires an increased provision of amenities, such as public

schools, to service its growing population.

Session 2:

» Build a better retaining wall between bus depot and St James Road. Noise and light pollution.

» Add a cultural focal point, eg a theatre on the bus depot. Get a world class architect to design.

» No high rise!

» More heritage looking terraces to blend into community.

» Higher density and urban renewal revitalises a neighbourhood and cycling paths and public

transport becomes viable.


5. Are there traffic hotspots? Is parking difficult in particular areas or at particular

times?

Session 1:

» We do not want quiet residential streets as ‘traffic routes’ to over developed dwelling sites.

Keep it quiet eg. Ruthven Street.

» Parking and traffic is difficult everywhere. Too much. People frequently do not notice the lights

at corner of Oxford with Grafton and so run the red light. Near misses are frequent with

pedestrians.

» Reduce vehicle traffic in the locality.

» Keep all development low, people equals cars equals traffic. It’s already congested as one lane

access.

» Address increasing traffic volumes and issues.

Session 2:

» Most visitors to Bondi Junction want to go to Westfield. They need to be directed down Syd

Einfeld and not turn right at York Road.

» Often very difficult / dangerous to make right hand turn from Ruthven into Oxford. Same with

Mill Hill.

» Oxford Street chicane is too congested (turn off from Syd Einfeld Drive to Oxford).

» Be able to turn right at York Road to Oxford Street.

» Bus drivers overload street parking at peak hours. Little room for further residents cars if the

bus depot remains.

» York Road now so congested in peak hour, many cars now using Ruthven to get to Oxford.

Speed humps required!!

» Mark parking spaces for cars. This will increase the number of cars that can park. NOT parking

metres!!

6. How can West Oxford Street provide a stronger sense of arrival to Bondi Junction?

Session 1:

» The entrance to the West Oxford Street Precinct could be more pedestrian friendly.

Session 2:

» Consider an alternate entrance into Bondi Junction so traffic flow is under Syd Einfeld (as

heading east down Wallis Street under Syd Einfeld onto Hegarty) to the back car park of

Westfield.

» Slow traffic down on York Road.

» Gateway building to emphasise entry to Bondi Junction.


7. How can access be improved to Woollahra for pedestrians and bike riders?

Session 2:

» Walk along footpath without terror of being hit by aggressive cyclist – need a safe path.

8. If there was one thing that you could improve in the public domain (including local

streets, laneways and parks), what would it be? (eg upgrading footpaths, lighting,

public seating, plantings, trees, public art)?

Session 1:

Parks and open space (9 responses – as summarised below):

» Explore linking St James Reserve with Centennial Park.

» Ensure the preservation and upkeep of parks in and around the West Oxford Street Precinct.

» Protect wildlife within the West Oxford Street Precinct and its surrounding parklands.

» Establish wildlife corridors and improve mobility of wildlife in and around the West Oxford Street

Precinct.

Session 2:

» Turn York Road and York Place into a cul-de-sac.

» West Oxford Street has become popular – beyond local residents – as a gathering point for

organic food. Great alternative to Westfield and Queen Street. Don’t destroy this please.

9. How can access between Oxford Street Bondi Junction and Centennial Park be

improved, for pedestrians and bike riders?

Session 1:

Cycling infrastructure (7 responses – as summarised below):

» Install dedicated cycle paths within the West Oxford Street Precinct.

» Improve cycling safety within the West Oxford Street Precinct.

» Improve cycling connectivity between the West Oxford Street Precinct and the surrounding area

(eg Woollahra, Centennial Park the beaches).

» Improve the connectivity between the West Oxford Street Precinct and Centennial Park.

10. How could potential conflicts between pedestrians, bike riders and vehicles be

resolved??

Session 1:

» Need for cycle paths linking Centennial Park and Bondi Junction – rather than the footpath as at

present. Removal of bus stop just east of Woollahra Gate and relocation to the rest of the Gate

(where it used to be!)

» More bike lanes

» Bike tracks, tracks, bike paths, bike space on roads

» Greater connectivity to Centennial park, upgrade footpaths


» Pedestrians/bike link between St James Park and Centennial Park through the bus depot would

be good.

Session 2:

» Entry and exit to St James Road from Oxford Street is problematic and dangerous. Buses park

across the street entrance.

» Ruthven Street needs chicanes / speed bumps to slow traffic. As well as make Ruthven Street

not accessible from city end, ie cars can’t turn right from Oxford Street.

» Preserve and extend St James Park! Important community space.

» Get cyclists off the footpath.

Given the large volume of comments made in relation to traffic and access issues in and around

the study area, these comments have are also presented in summary form on a map of the study

area (see Section 8.1 of this report).


Appendices


Appendix A: Participant feedback to the project team

Participant feedback to the project team Elton Consulting 1

Participant feedback to the project team

Community Drop-In Session No. 1 Participant feedback in discussions with members of the project team from Waverley Council and Elton

Consulting focused on:

Community values for the West Oxford Street Precinct

» People like the strong sense of community and neighbourly feel of the precinct.

» Some suggested officially naming the area “Mill Hill”.

Traffic and access issues

» Traffic is bad now – several people expressed concern about further congestion as a result of more

people moving into the area.

» Several participants commented that buses are adversely impacting traffic along Oxford Street. One

asked whether it is possible to send buses down Grafton Street?

» Suggested traffic improvements included:

> Consider a grade separation for traffic from the west turning right down York Road (ie traffic to go

underground between major intersection with Oxford Street and the end of the heritage building in

York Road), in order to improve pedestrian connections from Oxford Street to Centennial Park.

“Centennial Park then becomes a much better part of this precinct...a more active and better utilised

community asset.”

> Another member of the community was however concerned about the impact of road tunnels.

> Create ‘no right turn’ from Oxford Street into Ruthven Street during peaks.

» There is an existing need more off-street parking options – “…there is not enough anywhere in Bondi

Junction now. You can’t even park near your corner shop.” Buses currently park in St James Road and

Centennial Park. Any future development must come with significant off street parking so that the

already full local streets are not stretched further.

» If future development of the bus depot site occurs, create a through site link connecting St James Road

to Centennial Park for pedestrians, but while retaining the heritage façade of the building fronting

Centennial Park. A couple of participants commented that a visual connection from St James Road to

Centennial Park would also be positive. One also suggested a wide setback for pedestrians along Oxford

Street, should the bus depot site be redeveloped.

» Lots of bike riders ride on the footpath from Centennial Park to Denison (past About Life), posing a threat

to pedestrian safety, but this is not ‘policed’.

» Several participants were supportive of light rail.

Potential future development of major sites within the Precinct

» Strong anti-high-rise sentiment. Many people said they don’t want the area to end up like the “Westfield

end” of Bondi Junction.


» Feedback on appropriate height limits for any future development within the West Oxford Street precinct

varied, with some participants expressing a preference for 2-3 storeys and others for up to 8 storeys.

Many want the maximum building heights in the current LEP maintained (particularly given that it is so

new - 2012), and with higher buildings on the northern side of Oxford Street rather than the bus depot

site (as in the LEP). Some noted that maintaining solar access / minimising overshadowing, is as or more

important than building heights. Some expressed concern about loss of views. Some expressed concern

about other ‘high rise’ development in Bondi Junction, such as a 40 storey development being sold off the

plan.

» Many expressed concern that the State Government could approve future development on the bus depot

site (realising a significant return), without consideration for local needs / concerns. If there is a proposal

for the redevelopment of the bus depot site, people want to see it.

» Many commented that there is a need to preserve the heritage/history of the area. For instance, retain

the historical façade of the building fronting York Road on the bus depot site.

» Design quality was identified as an important consideration for any future development. Development

needs to fit in with existing character of the area – no ugly buildings like those near Westfield. The Royal

Women’s hospital redevelopment in Paddington was identified by a number of participants as an example

of good development (at least three different people mentioned this specifically).

» One participant commented on the need for any future development to be in keeping with the area and

for a cohesive streetscape “…use sweet pastel colours. Paleo Café does not belong in a suburban area.

Would love to see more consideration to aesthetic appeal of any future development in the precinct. It

should reflect the aesthetic appeal of the area’s heritage buildings – including cottages and Sugar Cafe.”

» Comments included:

> It’s important not to do high rise to the edge of the site.

> Redevelopment should include green, natural open space.

> There is a need for good, large floor plate commercial premises not just smaller offices.

> Don’t mind the idea of luxury apartments.

> Liked an earlier scheme for the bus depot site (17 years ago) which included buildings that stepped

down towards the edges of the site and a four storey office block.

» Some expressed concern about the potential for new development to impact on residents’ existing quality

of life. Some did not like the idea of “luxury apartments” on the edge of Centennial Park. “Centennial

Park was given to the government of NSW. It belongs to all of us.”

» Suggested future uses for the precinct included cafes, delis and clothing stores, childcare and a school.

There is existing pressure on local schools (such as Woollahra Public School which allows for 600

students). Where would greater numbers of children go to school?

Public domain and amenity issues

» The shops along the western end of Bondi Junction need to be revitalised.

» Activate the laneways on the northern side of Oxford Street with boutique restaurants and cafes.

» If the bus depot site is redeveloped, it should include a café and community facility (eg childcare centre,

museum, performing arts centre, etc). This was described as a “walkable centre with somewhere to sit

and have a coffee.”

» A couple of participants said the area needs “places you can go that feel safe to walk in”, like little

piazzas, not like “Bondi Junction mall”. These places were described as having atmosphere, perhaps with

music and a water feature. Importantly, they should feel safe.

» There are enough parks in the area – preserve the existing parklands, but there is no need for more.


» There were several comments on Bondi Junction Mall – focusing on the need to improve its amenity and

feeling of safety at night.

Planning and consultation process

» The community needs certainty about maximum building heights (ie developers shouldn’t be able to add

further storeys post approval).

» Council needs to be more transparent – about who owns what, how many planning proposals have been

submitted, etc.

» Many commented that the notification period for the drop-in session was inadequate and expressed the

view that members of the community should be involved in stakeholder meetings/workshops and the

design charette.


Community Drop-In Session No. 2 Participant feedback in discussions with members of the project team from Waverley Council and Elton

Consulting focused on:

Community values for the West Oxford Street Precinct

» Important to maintain the character of the conservation area to the south/adjacent to Centennial Park.

» The status quo in the area should not be decreased.

» Cafes are good in the sun - village atmosphere. Keep solar access to cafes on Oxford Street.

» Retain heritage conservation zone. Heritage houses in Grafton Street should be retained.

» Important to preserve the conservation area of the houses on Grafton Street and re-instate it as a quiet

residential street.

» Keep trees next to the bus depot.

» Maintain a diversity of user groups.

» Love Centennial Park and greenery in the local area.

» Keep the bus depot – bus services in the area are great.

» Retain transport uses on bus depot site.

» Value existing “quirky” shops and village atmosphere.

Traffic and access issues

» Improve safety in the area particularly for children crossing the York Road from Moriah College.

» Park access is a key issue in the area. Improve pedestrian and cyclist access to Centennial Park and

address existing conflicts in this location.

» Traffic congestion at Oxford Street/Syd Einfeld Drive is a huge issue. Please direct traffic down Syd

Einfeld Drive to get to the Westfield rather than through Oxford Street.

» Improve parking issues and traffic congestion particularly when trying to turn right from Ruthven Street

into Oxford Street.

» Leswell Street is too narrow. Need to widen the footpath and allow for improved traffic flow.

» Remove the sign to Westfield that directs traffic down Grafton Street. Send cars down Oxford Street or

Syd Einfeld Drive. A couple of participants commented that they would like to see Grafton Street become

a cul de sac to address the problem of speeding traffic in this location.

» Improve traffic congestion and allow cars to turn right from St James Road.

» All of the LEP Maps and project plans need to be updated to reflect that St James Road is no longer a

continuous thoroughfare to Oxford Street as the park extends across the carriageway. If the road has not

been officially/legally closed, Council needs to do this.

» The bus stop adjacent to the bus depot needs to be redesigned to incorporate a shelter. The

footpath/road needs to make provision for a cyclist path because at the moment cyclists bypass

pedestrians waiting at the bus stop and it is unsafe.

» One participant suggested relocating the bus stop/shelter near the bus depot several metres to the east –

so it could be set back from the footpath, in the grassed area.

» The corner entry point at West Oxford Street is marooned by traffic flow to Syd Einfeld Drive, the bus

depot and the traffic chaos of that intersection. Two participants suggested removing or reducing the size

of the existing corner at the western end of Oxford Street (where the surfboards are located) to allow for


road widening and improved traffic flow in this location – ie to create two right turning lanes from Oxford

Street into Bondi Junction rather than one lane as at present.

» There is a need for traffic calming measures on Grafton Street such as speed bumps to protect residential

nature of street between Nelson and Leswell Street. Or even consider the option of turning Grafton Street

in to a cul-de-sac.

» There is a need to address current issues first and foremost before planning for other things in the area.

Current issues such as traffic flow and street hierarchy. Especially need to redesign the western

intersection and making the traffic flow from the west easier in to Oxford Street. Get rid of the vegetated

island.

» Need to make it safer and easier for people to cross Leswell Street. Leswell Street is too narrow to take

the traffic load it currently is used for.

» Need to utilise the traffic capacity of Syd Einfeld Drive - it is currently underutilised. Especially for more

trucks as they currently over utilise Denison Street and Ebley Street which should be more residential,

quiet traffic streets.

» Safer crossing across York Road.

» Need for a pedestrian crossing across York Road - it currently takes too long to cross.

» No more traffic on York Road. Don’t make it possible to turn right from York Road into Oxford Street.

» Take the pedestrian crossing off West side of Oxford Street at Nelson Street intersection and move to the

eastern side to allow more cars to turn right from Nelson Street in to Oxford Street. Or make it no right

turn from Leswell Street in to Oxford Street.

» When approaching from the west on Syd Einfeld Drive there are always empty lanes.

» Do not redirect traffic from Newland Street to York Road because people are trying to cross York Road to

get to the park.

» Cyclist and pedestrian conflicts on footpaths occur too frequently.

» Cyclist should have own cycle path to improve safety.

» Parking should be retained to support shops.

» Cycle path should have a bridge to connect to Centennial Park like the Moore Park bridge.

» Grafton Street: the ‘right hand turn’ road sign located on the corner of Oxford Street and Syd Einfeld

Drive should be relocated to Leswell Street.

» Better management and enforcement to remove cyclists riding on footpaths.

» Heavy vehicles such as those serving Coles at Eastgate and Westfield should be directed down major

roads not residential streets.

» Traffic and parking along Oxford Street Bondi Junction are major issues. “You can’t move.”

» One participant suggested a layover in the bus depot site to allow traffic to pass buses with greater ease.

Potential future development of major sites within the Precinct

» Appropriate services should be in line with any developments that occur. It should be a holistic approach

to development.

» Retain terraces

» Retain historical facades

» Improve the issue of rubbish dumping

» Improve design quality – make the area more beautiful

» Create a cultural precinct


» Improve design standards

» Look at the cul-de-sac previously proposed by Woollahra Council

» Retain Heritage facade on bus depot

» Include design competitions in development. Use big name architects eg Renzo Piano

» Heritage conservation area to be reflected in any development to bus depot

» Nothing above the LEP height limit

» Retail at the gateway and residential to the South

» Explore option of moving the bus depot underground and utilising space above it or moving the location

of the bus depot. Changes to the bus depot need to coincide with the implementation of light rail and

increasing capacity of Syd Einfeld Drive.

» Anything higher than 8 Storeys will be too high because it will detrimentally affect the amenity of

surrounding residents.

» More weight should be given to what the existing residents in the study area say rather than there been

equal weight given to them, the wider community, businesses and government agencies.

» The building stock of West Oxford Street Precinct needs to be renewed - the buildings are overdue for

redevelopment, refurbishment and a 'facelift' - especially the blocks at the Western entry point to Bondi

Junction. A suitable height for this entry point may be 4 storeys.

» Need to review the heritage significance of the buildings at the Western corner entry point to Oxford

Street. It is a limitation of any possible future development of the site. The corner should be considered

for the opportunity to be redeveloped for an elegant well designed tower.

» The recently updated paving of West Oxford Street should continue along Oxford Street and to the

adjoining side streets.

» Cafe culture is not that fantastic idea for West Oxford Street unless the traffic conditions of the road are

calmed.

» Change existing commercial zoning to mixed use on Grafton Street.

» Fruit trees in the street for poor kids.

» WiFi in public areas.

» No high rise on bus depot. Keep to LEP 3 storeys - so as to not encroach upon future possibilities for

public transport. No reduction to public transport.

» Weighting for concept development: residents within the study area should have greater weighting for

what should happen here as they are most directly affected.

» Something needs to be done to enhance the building facades along West Oxford to bring the up to par

with Bondi Junction.

» Please don’t make Bondi Junction look like Chatswood.

» New buildings should be of the highest design standard.

» The bus depot has the capacity to be 3 storeys.

» Commercial development works: cafe/ organic / cycling.

» One participant commented that any future development on the northern side of Oxford Street should be

lower than the existing maximum height limits (ie should be kept to 2-3 storeys).

» One participant commented that the bus depot and Avis sites are not very attractive. They suggested

development on these sites that retains the heritage character of the local area, accompanied by a park.

» Future development should not overshadow existing residential areas. “I’ve lost all my winter sun and

now my house is dark and depressing. High rise development would do the same thing.”


» Support community focus - Suggested future uses: health services, school, green space, better quality

shops.

» Support low rise development of up to 3 storeys.

» Support development of up to 6 storeys. Design to maintain solar access to surrounding area and traffic

planning.

» Future development of bus depot site should step down from the centre towards the edge of Centennial

Park to minimise impacts on the park.

» The western end of Bondi Junction should not have a commercial focus like Bondi Junction CBD.

» Put in place planning controls that are “firm” and we can “stick to”. Ie controls that offer residents a

sense of security and stability. The LEP is good as it is.

» Future development of up to 5 storeys would be best.

» Support mixed use development up to 5 storeys.

» Protect the Mill Hill heritage area.

Public domain and amenity issues

» Too many vacant tenancies on Oxford Street between Denison Street and The Mall (including repeated

vacancies in shos). Support revitalisation of this shopping strip.

» Empty shops are inviting homeless people to move in, creating an unfavourable presence on street.

» Destination type shops, or shops that are purposeful eg, the pet shop, the paint shop, the printing shop

contribute to the area being alive. These type of shops also keep locals coming. It will be sad when the

timber and car yard shops move as this mean taking business out of the local area and you can’t do what

you want locally.

» Improve way finding and road signage.

» Artwork (surf boards) should be at a better scale. A couple of participants commented that the

surfboards are ugly. One commented the entrance of Oxford Street looks “grungy”.

» Gateway artwork should be attached to the footbridge that connects Bondi Junction and Woollahra so it

sits above Syd Einfeld Drive.

» Include piazza type spaces to improve the feel and atmosphere safety and enjoyment.

» More free accessible public space.

» The entry to Bondi Junction is not attractive.

» Wind tunnel effect is a major issue in Bondi Junction.

» There were several comments on Bondi Junction Mall – including one seeking for food smells around the

Bronka Arcade to be addressed.

Planning and consultation process

» Many expressed the view that members of the community should be involved in the design charette.


Appendix B: Display materials

Oxford Street

Queen Street

Ocean Street

Nelson Street

Edgecliff Road

Centennial Park

Clemenston Park

Oxford Street

York

Roa

d

York Place

Spring Street

Ebley Street

St J

ames

Roa

d

St J

ames

Roa

d

Ruth

ven

Stre

et

Mill

Hill

Roa

d

Den

ison

Str

eet

New

land

Str

eet

Syd Einfeld Drive

50m

West Oxford Street

Precinct

Thank you for participating in this Community Drop-In Session to discuss your ideas for the future of the western end of Oxford Street, Bondi Junction and surrounding area.

About the projectWaverley Council is working with the NSW Government

community

Why is planning for the precinct important?

strategic

Design Review

How you can get involved

the area

You can also provide feedback by:

A Plan for the West Ox ford Street PrecinctThe West Oxford Street precinct

A Plan for the West Ox ford Street PrecinctWhat sort of place do you want your neighbourhood to be?These photos show different aspects of the West Oxford Street Precinct. Your feedback will help us understand what you value about your local area as it is now, and any aspects of the area you would like to see improved.

Oxfo

rd S

tree

t

Que

en S

tree

t

Ocean Street

Nelson Street

Edgecliff Road

Cent

enni

al P

ark

Clem

enst

on P

ark

Oxf

ord

Stre

et

York Road York

Pla

ce

Sprin

g St

reet

Eble

y St

reet

St James Road

St James Road

Ruthven Street

Mill Hill Road

Denison Street

Newland Street

Syd

Einf

eld

Driv

e

50m

to

to m

ark

Ple

ase

tell

us h

ow /

why

. A Pla

n fo

r th

e W

est

Ox

ford

St

ree

t Pr

ec

inct

Enjoy

ing yo

ur

neigh

bour

hood

Oxfo

rd S

tree

t

Que

en S

tree

t

Ocean Street

Nelson Street

Edgecliff R

oad

Cent

enni

al P

ark

Clem

enst

on P

ark

Oxf

ord

Stre

et

York Road York

Pla

ce

Sprin

g St

reet

Eble

y St

reet

St James Road

St James Road

Ruthven Street

Mill Hill Road

Denison Street

Newland Street

Syd

Einf

eld

Driv

e

50m

A Pla

n fo

r th

e W

est

Ox

ford

St

ree

t Pr

ec

inct

Oppo

rtunit

ies

for th

e fut

ure

Your

feedb

ack w

ill help

us

unde

rstan

d wha

t yo

u see

as so

me of

the

oppo

rtunit

ies th

at co

uld be

rea

lised i

n the

stud

y area

.

Plea

se u

se th

e po

st-it

note

s

Wha

t are

som

e of

the

oppo

rtun

ities

that

cou

ld b

e

real

ised

in th

e ar

ea w

e ar

e

stud

ying

? Yo

u m

ay w

ant t

o th

ink

Wha

t mak

es W

est O

xfor

d St

reet

a s

peci

al p

lace

? H

ow

Q

If th

ere

was

one

thin

g yo

u co

uld

impr

ove

in th

e pu

blic

dom

ain

(incl

udin

g lo

cal s

tree

ts, l

anew

ays

and

park

s), w

hat w

ould

it b

e (e

g up

grad

ing

foot

path

s, li

ghtin

g,

publ

ic s

eatin

g, p

lant

ings

, tre

es,

publ

ic a

rt)?

Q

How

can

Wes

t Oxf

ord

Stre

et p

rovi

de a

str

onge

r se

nse

of a

rriv

al to

B

ondi

Jun

ctio

n?

Q How

can

acc

ess

betw

een

Oxf

ord

Stre

et B

ondi

Ju

nctio

n an

d C

ente

nnia

l Pa

rk b

e im

prov

ed, f

or

pede

stria

ns a

nd b

ike

rider

s?

Q

How

can

acc

ess

be

impr

oved

to W

oolla

hra

for p

edes

tria

ns a

nd

bike

ride

rs?

Q

How

cou

ld p

oten

tial

pede

stria

ns, b

ike

rider

s an

d ve

hicl

es b

e re

solv

ed?

Q

part

icul

ar a

reas

or a

t pa

rtic

ular

tim

es?

Q

Ove

r tim

e, th

ere

is li

kely

to

be

inte

rest

from

la

ndow

ners

in u

pgra

ding

or

dev

elop

ing

site

s in

the

Wes

t O

xfor

d St

reet

pre

cinc

t. W

hat

type

of l

and

uses

(eg

mix

of

reta

il, c

omm

erci

al, r

esid

entia

l, ot

her u

ses)

and

bui

lt fo

rm

wou

ld b

e ap

prop

riate

for f

utur

e de

velo

pmen

t on

thes

e si

tes?

Q

Are

ther

e an

y sm

all

chan

ges

that

cou

ld m

ake

a bi

g di

ffere

nce

to th

e ar

ea?

Q

Are

ther

e an

y ac

tiviti

es

you’

d lik

e to

be

able

to d

o in

the

futu

re, t

hat y

ou c

an’t

do n

ow?

Q

Q&

A

St SS

Waverley/Randwick/Woollahra LEP 2012 – Height limits Map

Information about the study area and current planning controls is provided here for your reference today.

Please note:

Infrastructure Commercial core

Centennial Park

A Plan for the West Ox ford Street PrecinctPlanning context

West Oxford Street Bondi Junction, looking east Existing building heights

Waverley/Randwick/Woollahra LEP 2012 – Zoning Map Waverley/Randwick/Woollahra LEP 2012 – Heritage Map

Planning controls

Existing conditions

A large amount of detailed feedback has been received from members of the community to date – through the recent “Ideas in the Park” Community Drop-In Session, community survey, and submissions to Council. A report documenting community feedback will be prepared following today’s session. In the meantime, some of what we’ve heard so far includes…

What do you like most about the West Oxford Street precinct?

What are the most important aspects of the area’s character and identity?

Issues to be considered in planning for the future of the area

Preserve the heritage character of the area

Continue to consult with the local community in

A Plan for the West Ox ford Street PrecinctWhat we’ve heard so far

A Plan for the West Ox ford Street PrecinctThanks and next stepsThank you for joining us today to contribute to the process of developing a plan for the West Oxford Street precinct.Please complete a survey today or online: haveyoursaywaverley.com.au/westoxford

What happens next?All feedback from today’s Community Drop-In Session and the earlier session (on Saturday 8 March) will be compiled in a report to be prepared by Elton Consulting. This report will be made available on Council’s website.

The next steps

Key dates and further consultations

Tuesday 13 May

Wednesday 18 June

Register your interest in receiving information

Importantly, there will be an opportunity for you and other members of the community to see the design concepts prepared by the designers, to

feedback on them.

Next stepsTask Timing

Community drop in session (St James Park)

Community survey (on-line)

Business survey

Visitor survey

Councillor ideas session / workshop

Community drop in session No. 2 (Waverley Library Theatrette)

Community reps / reference group meetings (ongoing) Ongoing

Design Charette - Session 1 (introduction)

Design Charette - Session 2 (formulation of concepts)

‘Concepts in the Library’ Community Drop In session (Waverley Library Theatrette)

Government agencies workshop

Councillor workshop

Design Charette - Session 3

Focus groups

(Waverley Library Theatrette)

Report to Council with recommendations

WE ARE HERE

Plea

se u

se a

gre

en d

ot to

mar

k th

e im

ages

that

you

lik

e m

ost a

nd in

a fe

w w

ords

tell

us w

hy (o

n a

post

-it n

ote)

.

Wha

t do

you

valu

e m

ost a

bout

the

area

? W

hat a

spec

ts o

f the

are

a w

ould

you

like

to s

ee re

tain

ed?

Plea

se u

se a

red

dot t

o m

ark

the

imag

es th

at s

how

are

as /

idea

s th

at y

ou d

on’t

like,

and

tell

us w

hy (o

n a

post

-it n

ote)

.

Wha

t asp

ects

of t

he a

rea

coul

d

be im

prov

ed?

A Pla

n fo

r th

e W

est

Ox

ford

St

ree

t

Is th

ere

som

ethi

ng y

ou’d

like

to s

ee in

the

Wes

t Oxf

ord

Stre

et p

reci

nct t

hat d

oesn

’t

appe

ar in

any

of t

he p

hoto

s?

If so

, em

ail u

s yo

ur p

hoto

with

a

shor

t des

crip

tion

abou

t why

you

’d

like

to s

ee th

is in

the

stud

y ar

ea

wes

toxf

ord@

wav

erle

y.ns

w.go

v.au

A Pla

n fo

r th

e W

est

Ox

ford

St

ree

t

A P

lan

for W

est O

xfor

d St

reet

, Bo

ndi J

unct

ion

and

the

surro

undi

ng

area

offe

rs a

n op

portu

nity

to th

ink

stra

tegi

cally

abo

ut th

is a

rea

as a

w

hole

. You

r fee

dbac

k w

ill be

use

d to

hel

p co

ntrib

ute

to p

lann

ing

for t

he

stud

y ar

ea a

s it

cont

inue

s to

evo

lve

– ov

er th

e ne

xt 5

, 10

and

20 y

ears

.

A Pla

n fo

r th

e W

est

Ox

ford

St

ree

t

A Pla

n fo

r th

e W

est

Ox

ford

St

ree

tSo

me of

wha

t we

’ve he

ard so

far


Appendix C: Survey tools

Ideas in the Park: Your Feedback

Page | 1

Please share your ideas about planning for the future of the western end of Oxford Street Bondi Junction, by completing this 5-10 minute survey.

Your feedback will be used by Waverley Council and its project team to help inform the development of a number of design options, and eventually a precinct plan, for the West Oxford Street precinct (see

map below).

This survey is being conducted by Elton Consulting on behalf of Waverley Council. All the information

you provide will be treated as confidential and you will not be individually identified in our report to Council.

Section 1: West Oxford Street as a Place 1. What do you like most about the West Oxford Street precinct as a place to live, work or visit?

i___________________________________________________________________________________

ii__________________________________________________________________________________

iii__________________________________________________________________________________

2. What do you see as the most important aspects of the ‘character and identity’ of the West Oxford Street area?

i___________________________________________________________________________________

ii__________________________________________________________________________________

iii__________________________________________________________________________________


Page | 2

3. How do you like to spend time in the West Oxford Street area (aside from when you’re at home or work)?

Shopping Going to cafes / restaurants

Enjoying the outdoors (eg parks, public seating) Walking

Bike riding

Other activities (Please describe)__________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________

Section 2: Opportunities for the Future The precinct plan offers an opportunity to think strategically about the future of the West Oxford Street precinct. Your feedback will be used to help contribute to planning for the

area as it continues to evolve – over the next 5, 10 and 20 years. 4. What are some of the opportunities for improvement that you’d like to see realised in

the West Oxford Street area? Please tick all that apply and provide any further comments Suggested improvements Your comments:

Improvements to the public domain including local streets, laneways and parks (eg upgrading footpaths, lighting, public seating, plantings, trees, public art)

Improved entry point to Oxford Street Bondi Junction from the west

Improved pedestrian access between Oxford Street Bondi Junction and Centennial Park

Improved access for bike riders between Oxford Street Bondi Junction and Centennial Park

Improved pedestrian access between Oxford Street Bondi Junction and Woollahra

Improved access for bike riders between Oxford Street Bondi Junction and Woollahra

Improved traffic arrangements / flow

Reduced impacts of traffic on amenity (eg through landscaping, other)

Improved parking arrangements

Other (Please describe)


Page | 3

5. Which of the above are most important to you? Please identify your top 3 improvements, where 1=most important Most important improvements (1-3)










Other (ie as described above)

6. Over time, there is likely to be interest from landowners in upgrading or developing sites in the West Oxford Street precinct. If this occurs, what type of land uses (eg mix of

retail, commercial, residential, other uses) and built form would be appropriate for future


___________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________

7. Do you have any other ideas or suggestions for improving the West Oxford Street

precinct?

___________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________

8. Are there any particular issues you think Council needs to consider in planning for the future of this area?

i___________________________________________________________________________________

ii__________________________________________________________________________________

iii__________________________________________________________________________________


Page | 4

Section 3: About You 9. Which of the following best describes you?

Resident of Bondi Junction (street name optional) ____________________________________

Resident of Woollahra (street name optional) _______________________________________

Resident of wider area (Please specify suburb) ______________________________________

Worker from business in Bondi Junction Owner / operator from business in Bondi Junction

Other (Please describe) _________________________________________________________

10. What is your age group? Under 18

19-25

26-35 36-55

56-65 66+

11. Gender: Male

Female

Section 4: Any Other Comments 12. Do you have any other comments you’d like to make about planning for the West

Oxford Street area?

___________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________

Thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts and suggestions.

Ideas in the Library: Your Feedback

Page | 1

Please share your ideas about planning for the future of the western end of Oxford Street Bondi Junction, by completing this 5-10 minute survey.

Your feedback will be used by Waverley Council and its project team to help inform the development of a number of design options, and eventually a precinct plan, for the West Oxford Street precinct (see

map below). Please note, the process could result in changes to Council's Local Environment Plan (LEP) and Development Control Plan (DCP).

This survey is being conducted by Elton Consulting on behalf of Waverley Council. All the information you provide will be treated as confidential and you will not be individually identified in our report to

Council.

Section 1: West Oxford Street as a Place 1. What do you like most about the West Oxford Street precinct as a place to live, work or visit?

i___________________________________________________________________________________

ii__________________________________________________________________________________

iii__________________________________________________________________________________

2. What do you see as the most important aspects of the ‘character and identity’ of the West Oxford Street area?

i___________________________________________________________________________________

ii__________________________________________________________________________________

iii__________________________________________________________________________________


Page | 2

3. How do you like to spend time in the West Oxford Street area (aside from when you’re at home or work)?

Shopping Going to cafes / restaurants

Enjoying the outdoors (eg parks, public seating) Walking

Bike riding

Other activities (Please describe)__________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________

Section 2: Opportunities for the Future The precinct plan offers an opportunity to think strategically about the future of the West Oxford Street precinct. Your feedback will be used to help contribute to planning for the

area as it continues to evolve – over the next 5, 10 and 20 years. 4. What are some of the opportunities for improvement that you’d like to see realised in

the West Oxford Street area? Please tick all that apply and provide any further comments Suggested improvements Your comments:












Page | 3

5. Which of the above are most important to you? Please identify your top 3 improvements, where 1=most important Most important improvements (1-3)











6. Over time, there is likely to be interest from landowners in upgrading or developing sites in the West Oxford Street precinct. If this occurs, what type of land uses (eg mix of

retail, commercial, residential, other uses) and built form would be appropriate for future


___________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________

7. Do you have any other ideas or suggestions for improving the West Oxford Street

precinct?

___________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________


i___________________________________________________________________________________

ii__________________________________________________________________________________

iii__________________________________________________________________________________


Page | 4







10. What is your age group? Under 18

19-25

26-35 36-55

56-65 66+

11. Gender: Male

Female

Section 4: Any Other Comments 12. Do you have any other comments you’d like to make about planning for the West

Oxford Street area?

___________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________

Thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts and suggestions.

Visitor Survey

(For use by Council’s team as a face-to-face intercept survey)

Hi, I’m conducting a short survey on behalf of Waverley Council – about planning for the future of the

western end of Oxford Street Bondi Junction. Do you have 5 minutes to share your thoughts and suggestions about this part of Bondi Junction?

(If yes)…Great. Your feedback will be used by Waverley Council and its project team to help inform the development of a number of design options, and eventually a precinct plan, for the West Oxford Street

precinct. [Interviewer to show study area for West Oxford Street Precinct Plan on map]

All the information you provide will be treated as strictly confidential and you will not be identified in

the report to Council to be prepared by Elton Consulting. [Interviewer to proceed to Question 1]

(If no)…That’s no problem. If you’d like to do the survey another time it’s also available on Council’s website until Friday 11 April 2014. [Interviewer to provide flyer with details of online survey / Ideas Session]







2. What is your age group?

Under 18 19-25

26-35

36-55 56-65

66+

3. [Interviewer to record gender:] Male

Female

Section 2: Uses and Activities

4. What’s the main reason for your visit to Bondi Junction today? [Interviewer to tick 1 box only]

Shopping Going to a café / restaurant

Enjoying the outdoors (eg park, public seating)

Going to markets / event Going to work

Going home Using local services (eg health appointment, banking)

Just passing through (eg walking, bike riding) Other (Please describe) ____________________________________________________

Visitor Survey

5. Are there any other reasons for your visit to Bondi Junction today? [Interviewer to tick all that apply]

Shopping

Going to a café / restaurant Enjoying the outdoors (eg park, public seating)

Going to markets / event Going to work

Going home

Using local services (eg health appointment, banking) Just passing through (eg walking, bike riding)

Other (Please describe) ____________________________________________________

6. Approximately how long will you spend in this part of Bondi Junction (ie the Oxford Street West precinct) today? [Interviewer to indicate study area]

Less than 10 minutes

11-30 minutes 31-60 minutes

1-2 hours More than 2 hours (Please specify) ___________________________________________

NA

7. In total, how long will you spend in Bondi Junction today? [Interviewer to tick 1 box only]

Less than 10 minutes 11-30 minutes

31-60 minutes 1-2 hours

More than 2 hours (Please specify) ___________________________________________

NA

8. In the last month how often have you visited Bondi Junction? [Interviewer to tick 1 box only]

Every day

Several times a week About once a week

Less frequently (Please describe) _________________________________________________

Section 3: West Oxford Street as a Place The next few questions are about the study area [Interviewer to point to study area on map].

9. What do you like most about the study area as a place to [live, work or visit]? Interviewer refer Question 1

i___________________________________________________________________________________

ii__________________________________________________________________________________

iii__________________________________________________________________________________

10. What are the most important aspects of the ‘character and identity’ of the study area to you?

i___________________________________________________________________________________

ii__________________________________________________________________________________

iii__________________________________________________________________________________

Visitor Survey

Section 4: Opportunities for the Future The precinct plan for West Oxford Street offers an opportunity to think strategically about the future of the study area. Your feedback will be used to help contribute to planning for

the area as it continues to evolve – over the next 5, 10 and 20 years. 11. What are some of the opportunities for improvement that you’d like to see realised in

the study area? [Tick all that apply and note any further comments] Suggested improvements Your comments:








Less impact of traffic on people using streets / cafes (eg through more landscaping, wider footpaths, other initiatives)



12. Which of the above are most important to you? [Read back only those nominated by respondent / number 1st, 2nd and 3rd most important improvements] Most important improvements (1-3)











Visitor Survey


sites in the study area. If this occurs, what type of land uses (eg mix of retail, commercial,

residential, other uses) and buildings would be appropriate for future development on these sites?

___________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________

14. Do you have any other ideas or suggestions for improving study area?

___________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________

Thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts and suggestions with me today.

If you’re interested in making fuller comments, you may like to come along to the Ideas in the Library

session. You can also email Council or take part in the survey on Council’s website. [Provide flyer with details]

We can also add you to the database to receive further information about this project if you’re interested? [If yes, interviewer to record on separate sheet]

Interviewer to record: Survey no.:_____ Date: __ /__ /__ Time period: _____ to ______

Location: __________________________ Interviewer initials: ______________

Map of the study area

Business Survey (For use by Council’s team as a face-to-face survey)

Hi, I’m conducting a short survey on behalf of Waverley Council – about planning for the future of the

western end of Oxford Street Bondi Junction. We’re talking to residents, visitors and businesses in the local area – and we encourage your business to have a say.

Is there a manager or owner who I could talk to today (or make an appointment to see), to conduct a 5 minute survey about planning for the future of this part of Bondi Junction? [Interviewer to show study area for West Oxford Street Precinct Plan on map]

Your feedback will be used by Waverley Council and its project team to help inform the development

of a number of design options, and eventually a precinct plan, for the West Oxford Street precinct.

(If yes)…Great.

All the information you provide will be treated as strictly confidential and you will not be identified in the report to Council to be prepared by Elton Consulting. [Interviewer to proceed to Question 1]

(If no)…That’s no problem. If you’d like to do the survey another time it’s also available on Council’s website until Friday 11 April 2014. [Interviewer to provide flyer with details of online survey / Ideas Session]

Section 1: Oxford Street West as a Place The survey questions are about the study area [Interviewer to point to study area on map].

1. What do you like most about doing business here in the study area? [Interviewer to indicate precinct on map]

i___________________________________________________________________________________

ii__________________________________________________________________________________

iii__________________________________________________________________________________

2. What are the most important aspects of the ‘character and identity’ of the study area to

you / your business?

i___________________________________________________________________________________

ii__________________________________________________________________________________

iii__________________________________________________________________________________

3. What are the main factors that attract people to this area? [Tick all that apply] Shopping

Going to cafes / restaurants Enjoying the outdoors (eg proximity to parks)

Walkable location Accessible for bike riders

Environment (eg sunny aspect / not windy)


Section 2: Opportunities for the Future The precinct plan for West Oxford Street offers an opportunity to think strategically about

the future of the study area. Your feedback will be used to help contribute to planning for

the area as it continues to evolve – over the next 5, 10 and 20 years.


4. What are some of the opportunities for improvement that you’d like to see realised in

the study area? [Tick all that apply and note any further comments] Suggested improvements Your comments:










Improved conditions / greater return for my business (Please describe)


5. Which of the opportunities for improvement that you nominated in the previous question are most important to you? [Read back only those nominated by respondent / number 1st, 2nd and 3rd most important improvements] Most important improvements (1-3)










Improved conditions / greater return for my business (ie as described above)




sites in the study area. If this occurs, what type of land uses (eg mix of retail, commercial, residential, other uses) and buildings would be appropriate for future development on

these sites?

___________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________

7. Do you have any other ideas or suggestions for improving the study area – to cater for the needs of businesses?

___________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________


i___________________________________________________________________________________

ii__________________________________________________________________________________

iii__________________________________________________________________________________

Section 3: About Your Business 9. Which of the following best describes your customers? [Interviewer to tick all that apply]

Residents of Bondi Junction / Woollahra Residents of wider area (Please specify suburbs if known) _____________________________

Workers from business in Bondi Junction Bike riders

Other (Please describe) __________________________________________________

10. How long has your business been in operation?

Less than 6 months 6-12 months

1-2 years 2-3 years

More than 3 years (Please describe) _______________________________


Thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts and suggestions with me today.

If you’re interested in making fuller comments, you may like to come along to the Ideas in the Library

session. You can also email Council or take part in the survey on Council’s website. [Provide flyer with details]

We can also add you to the database to receive further information about this project if you’re interested? [If yes, interviewer to record email address on separate sheet]

Interviewer to record: Survey no.:_____ Date: __ /__ /__ Time period: _____ to ______

Interviewer initials: _______________

[Interviewer also to record on a separate sheet: Survey no. Business name Business address Name / position of interviewee]

Map of the study area


B Consultation Outcomes: Concepts Session

West Oxford Street Precinct Plan – Consultation Outcomes: ‘Concepts’ Session Elton Consulting 1

West Oxford Street Precinct Plan – Consultation Outcomes: ‘Concepts’ Session 1. Summary of consultation outcomes

This document

This document has been prepared for Waverley Council by Elton Consulting. Section 1 provides a summary

of participant feedback to Council and its project team – including representatives of the NSW Government

Architect’s Office and three external design teams – made during the ‘Concepts’ Community Drop-In Session

held at 6-8pm on Tuesday 13 May. The Drop-In Session was held on the evening of day two of the design

charette, in order to provide members of the community with an opportunity to see the work in progress

draft concepts and ideas generated by the design teams on days one and two of the design charette. This

report will be provided to Council and the design teams prior to day three of the charette, to support further

refinement of the draft concepts and ideas.

Feedback on the study and process

» A total of 49 members of the community registered at the ‘Concepts’ Community Drop-In Session –

the third community drop-in session held by Council as part of the process of developing a precinct plan

for the West Oxford Street area.

» Through one-on-one conversations with each of the three design teams, members of the community

were invited to find out more about the concepts/ideas and to share their initial impressions, comments

and suggestions.

» Many participants expressed a high level of interest in the three design concepts and related ideas

displayed at the session. A large number of productive discussions took place between participants and

the design teams, where information about the draft concepts was exchanged and ideas tested. Some

participants, however, expressed concern about the drivers for the project. A summary of verbal

feedback is provided in this report.

» A short feedback form was provided to all participants seeking written feedback on the aspects of the

three concepts and ideas that participants liked most / least, as well as any other comments and

suggestions. A total of 42 feedback forms were completed as at 9am on Monday 19 May. That is, a

response rate of approximately 85%. A summary of written feedback is provided in this report. A copy of

30 completed feedback forms is attached (with 6 online responses available through Council).

» A total of five written submissions were made to Council following the session. A brief summary of

these submissions is also contained in this report.

Feedback on the draft concepts and ideas: an overview

» All three concepts attracted a mix of positive comments and critical feedback. Many of the 42

respondents who completed a feedback form identified ideas from each of the three concepts that they

liked most, as well as ideas that they liked least. As shown in the table below, more than half of all

respondents (ie at least 23 out of 42) liked one or more of the ideas in each of the three concepts.

Concept Ideas liked most (No. of

respondents)

Ideas liked least (No. of

respondents)

No. of respondents

1. Hill Thalis Concept 30 27

2. Simpson+Wilson Concept 23 26

3. Archrival Concept 29 19


» Many participants thought the draft concepts included some positive ideas for addressing traffic

congestion, improving pedestrian and cycle access in and around the study area, enhancing the public

domain and streetscapes, and providing new housing to accommodate population growth and

demographic change.

» Much critical feedback from participants was focused on the level of development suggested in the

Simpson and Thalis concepts, with less concern expressed in relation to the predominantly low rise

Archrival concept. Many expressed support for any future development within the study area to be within

the existing height limits in the current Local Environmental Plan (LEP). Other concerns raised in

feedback focused on: the consideration of the Waverley bus depot site and Centennial Park by the design

teams as part of the charette process; and the format for the Community Drop-In Session and short

response time for community feedback.

2. Detailed feedback on the draft concepts and ideas

Section 2 provides further details of participant feedback including discussions with the design teams,

completed feedback forms and submissions to Council.

Feedback on the Hill Thalis Concept

» A large number of participants liked the idea of redirecting ‘through’ traffic away from Grafton Street and

onto Syd Einfeld Drive (to reduce traffic on Grafton Street). However, others thought this could slow

traffic on Syd Einfeld Drive. Some thought that more traffic calming measures were required for Grafton

and Nelson streets.

» There were mixed views on the intersection of Oxford Street, Syd Einfeld Drive and Ocean Street, with

some participants concerned that the proposed changes to this intersection would not work well. Some

were concerned that the proposed changes to the road network might result in increased traffic

congestion in Queens Park.

» Many participants liked the idea of freeing up Nelson Street from traffic and creating a pedestrian and

cyclist-friendly “café” or “village” precinct including the pedestrian/cycle bridge to Woollahra. Some liked

the reintroduction of lanes and connections to Woollahra. One respondent commented that restaurants in

this location should be open at night as a condition of operation to help increase community safety.

» Many participants liked the idea of improving pedestrian and cyclist connections between Bondi Junction

and Centennial Park and a new entry to the park at its north east corner. However, some did not see the

point in these improvements.

» Some commented that the 4-6 storey buildings proposed along Oxford Street should be restricted to 3-4

storeys. There was some resistance to the idea of taller buildings facing Oxford Street as potentially

“opening the flood gates” for further development over and above the maximum building heights in the

current LEP. Conversely, a couple of participants believed that 4-6 storey mixed use redevelopment in

this location would not give adequate incentive to existing land owners to support the “great public

works” proposed.

» Some participants were strongly opposed to the idea of high density housing in this concept. Some

commented that the high density development at the intersection of Oxford Street/Syd Einfeld Drive fails

to address the key issues raised in community feedback in Phase 1 of the study.

» Many participants strongly supported maintaining the bus depot function on the bus depot site now and

into the future, commenting on the importance of bus services for the whole eastern suburbs community

(“safeguarding the bus depot as critical infrastructure”). Some participants expressed support for the

treatment of the bus depot site, including keeping within the height limits of the existing LEP. Some

believed that this type of development would provide more housing choice and improve neighbourhood

character. However, others did not wish to comment on these ideas, noting that the bus depot is outside

the study area.


» Other ideas which some participants liked included: redevelopment of the gateway corner (ie integrating

the traffic island with the housing by closing the continuation of York Road north of Oxford Street); the

area near the reservoir; tree plantings along Syd Einfeld Drive; and the Ruthven Street garden.

» Some participants did not like the idea for the new bus administration building, commenting that this idea

would just make the “already busy Oxford Street even busier’, or that this space should be “returned to

the public”.

Simpson+Wilson Concept

» Parking was the single biggest issue raised by participants in comments to this design team (with

approximately 500 new dwellings as part of this concept). This concept is based on the notion of ‘more

people not cars’ – providing no parking for new residents. While there was some support for this notion,

many participants commented that parking including for visitors would still be required, with related

impacts on traffic flows. One participant commented: “Way too idealistic to assume no one will drive

cars!”

» Many people saw a need for new retail space in the study area located along Oxford Street.

» Many people liked the treatment of “Nelson Street as a place”, describing it as a “piazza” area or “lively

eating precinct during the evening”. Some liked the stronger connection to Woollahra via the expanded

footbridge.

» There were a range of views on the proposals for future development as part of this concept. Some

people seemed supportive of the idea of 4-5 five storey development to the north and south of Oxford

Street (no change to the existing LEP), and locking in the subdivision pattern and fine grain. However,

others thought the proposal for 4-6 storey buildings should be reduced to 3-4 storeys. There were mixed

views on the idea of development on the other side of St James Street, with lack of parking provision

identified as a key issue.

» Many participants expressed concern about the “tower development” and some thought the study

process was about a “hidden agenda”. Others however liked the iconic landmark tower on the corner /

entrance to Bondi Junction.

» Many of the people who commented on this concept expressed support for general improvements to

Oxford Street and the bus depot site, widening of footpaths, and an improved entry to Centennial Park.

» Some participants commented that this concept should not consider the bus depot site, as it is not within

the study area. Several commented that the existing capacity of the bus depot should not be reduced,

while others believed the bus station should be rationalised. Some thought the idea for buses to exit the

bus depot on York Road would add to existing traffic congestion.

» Many people who commented on this concept believed that the reservoir in Centennial Park is currently

underutilised and undervalued. Many saw the relationship of this site with Paddington Reservoir Park

which they liked as a place. However, some thought that Paddington Reservoir Park was not well used.

There were mixed views on the Turkish baths and skate park ideas.

» Other ideas which participants liked included: provision for light rail and cycling infrastructure; retaining a

mix of residential, commercial and retail uses; reclaiming land from the bus depot and Centennial Park;

and the art gallery idea. One respondent suggested “looking at the area under the Bondi Junction bypass

which could be redeveloped.”


Feedback on the Archrival Concept

» Many participants were positive about this draft concept and the ideas it contains.

» Many participants liked the low rise nature of this concept, that it stays within the existing LEP, and does

not include proposals for buildings facing Oxford Street. Participants described this concept as: the “low

rise option”, “mostly low rise development, gentle, sympathetic plan” and “lower impact”. However,

others thought it underutilised the precinct and would therefore not generate sufficient revenue to

improve the locality. One participant described this concept as “totally unrealistic”.

» Many thought the Archrival concept responded well to community values for the precinct and reflected

the character of the local area. “[They] have given more thought to what the community want. They

want to keep within the LEP regulations…the best so far”.

» Many participants responded well to the notion of a ‘cultural’ program that underpins this concept. They

liked the idea of a cultural centre and use of the precinct as a “great cultural space”. Many people liked

the idea of a gallery or other uses such as a skate park. However a small number of participants did not.

One regarded the gallery idea as a “wasted opportunity”, commenting “who would pay for this?”

» Some respondents specifically commented that they liked the treatment of the bus depot site. However,

there were mixed views about the idea to move the bus depot entry/exit from Oxford Street to York

Road. Many liked this idea as a way of relieving congestion along Oxford Street and improving access for

pedestrians and cyclists. However, several people thought this idea would not work. A couple commented

on the need to ensure bus driver changeovers would not further contribute to traffic congestion along

Oxford Street. In addition, several believed that the idea of a road cutting through the bus depot site

(from St James Road to Centennial Park) was not necessary.

» Several participants commented that they liked the signature building at the corner of York Road and

Oxford Street. In particular, they liked the way this building maximises solar access within the precinct,

by concentrating height towards Syd Einfeld Drive. However, others were opposed to a “substantial

building” above the LEP height limits in this location.

» Many people liked the idea of increasing activation of Nelson Street and also liked the pedestrian bridge.

» The idea for turning the reservoir into a park and reusing water from the reservoir in the public art

“water towers” attracted considerable comment and mixed views. Many liked the park idea. However,

while some participants “loved” the public art idea, others thought it had not been adequately considered

(eg “we need the water”, “the water tanks would not hold all the water from the reservoir”), could be “an

eyesore” or was an “unnecessary addition” to this concept. Some liked these concepts but thought they

might be “unrealistic sweeteners to encourage other commercial development”.

» There were mixed views about the plans to improve and expand pedestrian and cycle access to

Centennial Park near Oxford Street and York Road. Many liked the improved pedestrian and cycle

connections to the park, while some thought the loss of the Oxford Street road slipway would impede

traffic flows, particularly buses.

» Many liked the “new grand entrance to Centennial Park”, the sense of arrival created by the green space

at the intersection of York Road, Oxford Street and Syd Einfeld Drive, and the additional street trees. One

participant suggested that this new green space should be a native garden to contribute to bird life in the

local area.

» Some commented that they liked the idea of maintaining the retail strip along Oxford Street between

Nelson and Leswell streets.

» Some liked the idea of public art on Syd Einfeld Drive (sound walls) and in front of the bus depot.


Other ideas or suggestions for improving the West Oxford Street precinct and / or refining the

draft concepts

Most ideas and suggestions focused on:

» Upgrading the local road network to improve traffic flow in and around the study area

» Limiting any future development in West Oxford Street to the existing LEP. Several participants

commented that some or all of the concepts should have “stayed within the LEP and not considered the

bus depot”. Other comments focusing on maintaining local amenity were:

> “Maintain existing LEP to limit height of Oxford Street redevelopment – the area has a high population

density already.”

> “Walked along Oxford Street yesterday – not a glimmer of sunshine on either side of street opposite

310-330 Oxford Street – cold and grey…”

» No development on the bus depot site. One participant commented: “Please do whatever you can to

prevent the State Government selling the bus depot site or the air space above it.”

» Support for improved pedestrian, cycle and public transport connections and the need for more emphasis

on this. Comments included:

> “more connections through bus depot site”

> “better consideration of Grafton Street traffic calming measures”

> “[Concepts are] too focused only on traffic”

> “Buses on Syd Einfeld Drive in summer as beach express. Tunnels from Bondi Junction train line to

beach. Tunnels under the Junction and dedicated bus lanes. Murals in front of bus depot and Syd

Einfeld sound walls with art.”

> “We need to remove CO2 from the atmosphere if we are to keep temperature rise to <2 degrees C.

This means de-emphasising cars, eventually eliminating them and favouring walking and cycling.”

> “I would like to see the West Oxford Street area development focus on creating a village atmosphere.

Wider footpaths, less cars, more trees, more green space.”

» Reflecting more on the Phase One community feedback and retaining the “village” feel of the West

Oxford Street area.

A number of interesting comments were made with a focus on: the need for new amenities, more customer

parking, upgraded buildings and shopfronts, new housing that is well designed, and contributions to fund

the improvements proposed as part of the draft concepts. Comments included:

» “Coffee shops at bus depot interface are a great idea.”

» “All use-by-dated buildings to be reinvented into modern infrastructure”

» “None of the concepts provide for car parking. To attract people away from Westfield we need easy and

convenient access. Parents with children won’t want to come here if it’s too hard. Larger local businesses

can’t survive if customers can’t easily park.”

» “…Why does Council not offer the shopkeepers some incentive to paint/restore/beautify the existing

buildings along Oxford Street some of which are a bit run down. Come up with a beautification plan of

existing structures. Anyway, where it the money coming from for all this public infrastructure work?”

» “Increases in heights and densities, where this does not result in overshadowing of residential properties

on the southern side of Oxford Street, to cater for increases in population and demand for housing.

Incentives for developers to pay for proposed public improvements, not ratepayers, need to be

increased.”

» “Almost all of the ideas are great but will cost a fortune to turn into reality. Rate-payers will not want to

foot the bill, so only through developer contributions will this ever happen. More development incentives

need to be created.’


Review of submissions

A total of five submissions were received by Waverley Council in relation to the West Oxford Street study.

Four were made by individual members of the community and one was made by the Save West Bondi

Junction group (Submission No. 4).

Submission No.1:

» The format for the Community Drop-In Session did not enable full community input to the design

process.

» The charette process should not consider the bus depot site/airspace which is not part of the study area.

» Concepts should be within the existing height limits in the 2012 LEP.

Submission No. 2:

» The format for the Community Drop-In Session did not enable full community input to the design

process.



Submission No.3:



» Any plan for West Oxford Street should put residents first and enhance the neighbourhood.

Submission No.4:

» Retention of Heritage Homes on Grafton Street. We are pleased that all concepts retained the

heritage homes along Grafton Street.

» Not in accordance with the 2012 LEP. We are against any development that does not align with the

current height and floor space ratios as stipulated in the 2012 LEP. All the proposals included a tower at

the eastern end of the precinct that was in breach of the existing 2012 LEP. During the community

presentation all design team members were questioned about the presence of this building on their plans

by Save West Bondi Junction members. The three design teams in one way or another advised that this

spot on the eastern end of the precinct could be used for a building greater in height than the 2012 LEP

currently stipulates. We are further concerned that all design teams made use of this particular spot

given it is this land the developer that prompted the charette process has option on to develop. We can

only assume council guidance led to this, though not being present can’t be sure of this assumption.

» Waverley Bus Depot. We are particularly concerned that council members who were present at the

charettes did not advise the design teams the bus depot should not form part of the consideration area

following the confirmation by the State Government that it wasn't for sale and the Mayoral Minute that it

excluded it from the process. The Hill Thalis and in particular the Simpson + Wilson concepts included

extensive development of the site. We are against the development of the bus depot. May we ask why

council members present who were aware of both the State Government position and the Mayoral minute

not provide guidance to the design teams on this?

» Centennial Parklands development. We are perplexed as to why such consideration and time in the

designs was given to land within Centennial Parklands. This area was outside of the precinct and outside

the control of Waverley Council. The concepts presented for these spaces appear highly unlikely given


the cost involved in development and can only be considered to be sweeteners to encourage community

endorsement for other commercially driven development.

» Community feedback. We are disappointed that yet again council bungled the community engagement

process. The changing of the venue late in the piece and the non-provision of printed materials to alert

people of the venue change surely resulted in less community being aware of the event. Further the

hurried feedback period is disappointing to say the least. The review process on the night was shambolic.

People were crowded around small printouts with text only readable when up-close. There was no

presentation from the design teams on their concepts. Instead the designers engaged in one-on-one

discussions that many members personally found difficult to engage with, hear clearly or make sense of.

Considering the previous issues with community feedback we can only assume this is due to Council not

appropriately valuing this part of the process or a more sinister motive.

Submission No.5:

» Reiterates issues raised in Submission No. 4

Attachment: Completed feedback forms


C Consultation Outcomes: Public Briefing Session

Elton Consulting 01

West Oxford Street Public Briefing

Summary of community feedback

This document provides a summary of community feedback from the recent Public Briefing session that was

held as part of the West Oxford Street project at Easts Leagues Club on Wednesday 18 June 2014. It outlines

comments and questions from members of the community who participated in the session and responses from

Waverley Council and its project team. The purpose of the session was to present the ideas and design

concepts developed by three independent design teams – Hill Thalis, Simpson+Wilson, and Archrival – in liaison

with Council and the NSW Government Architect’s Office, through a design charette process. The design

charette considered community input collected through three community drop-in sessions held as part of the

first steps in the project. The session was led by Peter Monks, Director of Planning and Environmental Services

at Waverley Council, with questions and answers facilitated by Brian Elton of Elton Consulting.

Q&A – Peter Monks

Q: Why is Waverley Council ignoring local residents’ concerns about high rise? Why does Waverley Council think

they can take a piece of Centennial Park away from the people of Sydney?

Response: The design teams have taken building heights and solar-access modelling into account as part of

their design. Additionally, the design teams have worked to align their design concepts with the 2040

Centennial Park Master Plan.

Q: Why is there this idea of redevelopment around? Waverley Council is already one of the most densely

populated LGAs in the country with 8,000 people per square kilometre. We don’t need more development.

Response: We do have a dense population. Any development needs to be both balanced and sensitive. We still

need to look at development opportunities where they are available, but we also need to look at transport

infrastructure, promoting small business and the look and feel of our streets.

Q&A – Hill Thalis

Q: Can you reassure us that developers will redevelop the West Oxford Street Precinct within the public

interest?

Response: We have clearly identified and differentiated between public and private interests. However through

a process like this and thinking more broadly than a single development proposal, we have an opportunity to

bring them together to get wins and deliver community benefits. While we need to manage local impacts, we

also need to think about wider Sydney and what is in the broader public interest.

Q: I disagree with increasing the population density of West Oxford Street. Old buildings need to be preserved.

They don’t need to be changed and retail is starting to take off in this area.

Response: I agree with the need to keep the fine grain. There are plenty of good examples of building on top of

existing shops and even building up to five storeys on very small sites. If you have to provide car parking this is

made difficult.

Q: If people can cycle in London and New York, why can’t we improve cycling in Bondi Junction?

Response: We need to rethink the way we plan cities in order to improve the safety and feasibility of cycling. Cars are currently given priority in Bondi Junction. Parking for cars wastes a lot of valuable space. As I indicated in my presentation there are no solutions in providing for more cars.

Elton Consulting 02

Q&A – Simpson + Wilson

Q: A key issue for me is the amount of noise on Oxford Street and the potential amplification of noise with

further development. Has anybody thought about noise levels with more buildings and greater heights?

Response: Our plan is to reduce traffic volumes and create pedestrianised, car-free zones. These measures

reduce noise levels on Oxford Street. Our idea of creating a public space in Nelson Street would create a place

where noise is lower.

Q: Trams or light rail have created issues in the past. Have these issues been considered? Where will the buses

go?

Response: Most of the bus depot would remain operational. We would look at putting some of the buses under

the expressway where the Wilson car park is.

Q: In your design, why aren’t the buildings tapered towards Centennial Park?

Response: We aren’t wedded to this idea that cities and centres need to rise to a peak in the centre. As long as

impacts such as overshadowing can be managed, varied buildings can provide character. Successful, modern,

intelligent cities contain a mix of different levels of density.

Q: I am concerned with about over-shadowing and additional cars being forced to park in Centennial Park. Also

what does “fine grained” mean?

Response: Our initial solar access modelling doesn’t indicate over-shadowing impacts. The buildings we are

envisaging in this section of Oxford Street are nothing like the towers in the mall area of Bondi Junction. More

car parking kills local streets. At some point we need to address whether cities are for cars or people. With the

level of transport here, we should be able to have an increase in population with fewer cars. Fine grain refers to

small lots that provide an intimate, human scale. The terrace houses that are throughout much of West Oxford

Street give the area its fine grained character.

Q: I have issues with the proposed building on the corner at the entrance way to West Oxford Street and Bondi

Junction. I am concerned that a building of that height will set the precedent for taller buildings along West

Oxford Street. Additionally, I am concerned with any construction occurring in Centennial Park and also believe

the bus depot should be left out of any plans to reform the West Oxford Street Precinct. Public land shouldn’t

be up for private development.

Response: Let me clarify, we are not building additional structures in Centennial Park. We are providing

amenities structures and supporting public recreation, all of which are things that are needed in the area. We

are planning on revitalising the Woollahra Reservoir so the public can enjoy this open space. What we are

proposing is fully consistent with the Centennial Park Master Plan and doesn’t seek to put private development

within the park.

Q&A – Archrival

Q: Oxford Street has no street life. How can we stimulate retail activity and improve the street life of West

Oxford Street?

Response: Improving the public domain will help to stimulate retail activity and enliven the area.

Comment: I like the achievable scale of your plans compared to the others and congratulate you on your

efforts.

Comment: I like the idea of reclaiming the corner of Centennial Park. It is important to attract people back to

this forgotten corner of Centennial Park as long as it is sympathetic with the values of the park.

Elton Consulting 03

Q: Have you thought about a way of taking buses more directly onto Syd Einfeld Drive? Oxford Street is not a

through road so why send through traffic along it?

Response: We will consider all options that make use of existing infrastructure. I agree that tackling traffic is an

important measure.

Comment: I am concerned about my direct access to and from Bondi Junction being removed. I have two kids

that I need to drop off at school.

Peter Monks: Closing remarks

Q: What about considering the social needs of more growth. Have you thought about the pressure on schools?

Response: Yes this is something that would need to be looked at. At this point we are a long way off any definite scheme. Any development would need to go through its own planning process where these issues would be investigated.

ideas for west oxford street - waverley council...sydney 02 9387 2600 level 6 332 – 342 oxford...

Documents