iawd asset management regional services hub asset
TRANSCRIPT
IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub –
Asset Management Activities
Presented by:
Dr. P. Kolovopoulos
UTVSI
Dissemination of a methodology to allow the generation of Management Reports for a utility based upon technical and commercial inputs.
Management guidance, to interpret management reports and formulate appropriate decisions
Assistance in creating effective management reporting at all levels
Utility performance assessment, through the involvement of industry experts to help analyse the Utility’s performance and to identify appropriate remedial and proactive activities
Support for regular System audits, identifying problem areas both with regard to usage of the system and business procedures
IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub
Asset Management Activities
The IAWD AM hub will use the latest available AM technology capitalizing on the development efforts and knowledge built in Belgrade Water Works over the last 10 years.
BWS has already a pool of available resources trained in AM techniques and systems that can provide the services and use the existing infrastructure (EDAMS)
The AM will operate primarily through cloud technology with reduced operational costs, enabling much easier participation of Utilities.
IAWD and BWS will evaluate in the course of the project the development of a business model to maintain and support the activities on a cost recovery basis after the completion of the project.
IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub
Sustainability of Centre /Project
# Muncipality Country
Population
Total
Municipalit
y
Served
by UtilityCoverage
1 Banja Luka Bosnia
Hercegovina
250,000 240,000 96%
2 Kozarska
Dubica
Bosnia
Hercegovina
31,577 20,000 63%
3 Subotica Serbia 141,554 110,832 78%
4 Bijeljina Bosnia
Hercegovina
120,000 75,000 63%
5 Smederevo Serbia 107,652 63,382 59%
6 Budva Montenegro 15,909 75,108 472%
7 Bosanska Krupa Bosnia
Hercegovina
29,659 20,998 71%
8 Gračanica Bosnia
Hercegovina
58,926 20,060 34%
9 Prilep R.Makedonija 76,768 72,378 94%
10 Zenica Bosnia
Hercegovina
138,439 91,000 66%
11 Srebrenik Bosnia
Hercegovina
21,371 17,609 82%
12 Velika Kladuša Bosnia
Hercegovina
47,759 44,421 93%
13 Gornji
Milanovac
Serbia 44,406 38,487 87%
14 Probistip R.Makedonija 16,193 14,024 87%
15 Niksic Montenegro 75,282 73,938 98%
16 Vitez Bosnia
Hercegovina
25,109 17,576 70%
17 Neum Bosnia
Hercegovina
5,174 4,178 81%
18 Cazin Bosnia
Hercegovina
69,411
IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub
Utilities participating in the program
Direct access to customers and uploading / downloading of information
through EDAMS-CRM application
EDAMS CRM is a simple, easy to use portal for the exchange of
information between the customers and the center.
IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub
Implementation of Services
All geographical data is published on EDAMS-Web-GIS and Client is given
one free license of the software to use
EDAMS Web GIS is a simple, easy to use web GIS application. Your
selected network can be viewed, queried and analysed, e.g. producing
thematic reporting of water quality at monitoring points.
IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub
Implementation of Services
Utility Assessment & Recommendations
Regular Management Reporting
On-line access to GIS data & reports
Direct support though CRM and assistance
Workshops & training per phase
Dissemination of information through Seminars, papers etc.
IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub
Project Outputs
Frequency of reporting is recommended and can change to suit
requirements
Reports are consolidated to 3-monthly, 6-monthly basis
Access is given to EDAMS-CRM web site for submitting and receiving
reports
Reports are accompanied with excel files and shapefiles for element
reference
Progress reports indicating key indicators of all previous analyses are given
IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub
Types of Services
Asset Register Evaluation (ARE)
Commercial Data Evaluation (CDE)
Un-Accounted for Water Analysis (UFW)
Maintenance Records Analysis (MRA)
Financial Assets Evaluation (FAE)
Maintenance & Rehabilitation Planning (MRP)
Objectives
the building up of a Validated Network Asset Register,
[essential for Asset & Maintenance Management & Infrastructure Planning]
Data Requirements
Shapefile of current Network Asset Register,
[if a GIS currently does not exist – the Client should consider the Entry Solution, where EDAMS-GIS/ Network Data Management system is implemented]
Activities
Importing data to EDAMS-NDM
Network Data Evaluation
Hydraulic Zones Definition
Zone Analysis
Publishing of data
Asset Register
Evaluation (ARE)
IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub
Asset Register Evaluation
Network Data Evaluation Report
Zone Evaluation Report
Publishing of data in EDAMS Web-GIS
Desk-top editing
Field Validation
Further Work/ Added Benefits
Deliverables
IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub
Asset Register Evaluation
Assets Register Evaluation- Methodology & Procedures
Managing Discrepancies
ARE.1 Connectivity Problems
ARE.1.1 List of Chains not allocated to network
ARE.1.2 List of Nodes not allocated to network
ARE.1.3 List of Pipes not allocated to network
ARE.1.4 List of Valves not allocated to network
ARE.1.5 List of Closed Valves on Long chains
ARE.1.6 List of De-commissioned ChainsARE.2 Attribute Problems
ARE.2.1 List of Water Treatment Plants with missing hydraulic attributes
ARE.2.2 List of Tanks / Reservoirs with missing hydraulic attributes
ARE.2.3 List of Pump Stations with missing hydraulic attributes
ARE.2.4 List of Control Valves (PRV) with missing hydraulic attributes
ARE.2.5 Pipes not linked to LibrariesARE.3 Zoning Problems
ARE.3.1 Closed Valves within districts
ARE.3.2 Hydraulic Zones to be investigated
ARE.3.3 Mass Balancing Zones to be investigated
ARE.3.4 Head Zones to be investigated
ARE.3.5 Hydraulic zoning problems
ARE.3.6 Mass Balancing zoning problems
ARE.3.7 Head Zones zoning problems
Assets Register Evaluation- Methodology & Procedures
Managing Discrepancies>Connectivity Problems
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Chains not allocated to zones
Nodes not allocated to Zones
Pipes not allocated to Zones
Valves not allocated to Zones
Closed Valves on Long chains
De-commissioned Chains
Connectivity Problems
ARE 1.4: List of Valves not allocated to networkElement
Id
Element Ref
218 V241
377 V564
726 Valve 25
729 Valve 28
749 Valve 49
3254 Valve 2582
3527 Valve 2859
3600 Valve 2932
18692 Valve 18692
18985 Valve 18985
20965 Valve 20965
21472 Valve 21472
Objectives
Improvement of Commercial data Quality
Consumption Analysis and Identification of problematic meters, connections and meter readings, towards the reduction of UFW-apparent losses
Calculation of present authorised demand, comprising of metered demand and metering inaccuracies
Data Requirements (from Billing system)
Properties database that should include: (1) Property number, (2) Township, (3) Plot number, (4) Consumer Category
Billing Connections database
Billing Meter database (make, size, age)
Billing history-water (12 months): (a) Meter Readings, (b) Meter replacements.
Commercial Data
Evaluation (CDE)
Commercial Data Evaluation- Methodology & Procedures
Objectives & Data Requirements
Activities
Data Conversion (from Utility’s billing system into the EDAMS system)
Exceptions Analysis (missing or inconsistent links between data elements)
Meter reading analysis (2 years historical meter readings). Unreliable meter readings are traced and are flagged.
Authorised demand analysis:
demand per connection = metered demand + metering inaccuracies (losses).
Average demand per consumer type
Consumption analysis: patterns per Township, Per Consumption , Land Use, and Land Usage categories and Per Customer group.
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
633
0 0336
0
3,507
0
952
2,052
1,474
Ml / year
Commercial LossesPublishing of data: CDE results are uploaded into EDAMS Web GIS.
Commercial Data Evaluation- Methodology & Procedures
Objectives & Data Requirements
A comprehensive CDE report that includes:
• Meter Readings Analysis
• Consumption analysis (Metered demand)
• Metering Inaccuracies (Apparent losses)
• High Consumer Analysis
• Meters Analysis
• Estimates Analysis
Lists & shapefiles of problematic meters (stuck, slow, etc.) and meters with problematic readings
Present authorised demand, comprising of metered demand and metering inaccuracies per connection
Published data in EDAMS Web-GIS
Commercial Rehabilitation, including replacement of problematic meters, addressing, high consumers, areas with poor meter readings, etc..
Further Work/ Added Benefits
Deliverables
Commercial Data Evaluation- Methodology & Procedures
Reporting & Deliverables
List of invalid sub-connections (no:103)
Suspect Residential Consumers
Meters with unknown meter size
Meters with unknown attributes (meter type, age, serial no)
Commercial Data Analysis & Rehabilitation
System Discrepancies
A.17: List of invalid sub-connections
(no main connection allocated)
Nadredjena_dopuna_registra
1 3000
2 3461
3 3509
4 3509
5 4982
6 5231
7 5263
8 6196
9 6230
10 6398
11 6539
A.16: List of Suspect Residential Consumers (Consumption > 10 m3/day)
(Category:Households billed by BVK -not buildings)Customer
NumberCustomer Name
Property
Ref
Average Consumption
(m3/day)
Grand total: 4,557.6
1 56906 VELJKOVIC MIODRAG-DOMACINSTVO 149812 10.1
2 64082 KILIBARDA SNEZANA-DOMACINSTVO 102078 10.1
3 98375 KURGAS S NADA-DOMACINSTVO 128747 10.2
4 105644 MRMAK P GORAN-DOMACINSTVO 6718 10.2
5 30336 XVII MZ ''SELO RAKOVICA'' 149984 10.3
6 56472 LECIC MILIVOJE-DOMACINSTVO 46367 10.4
7 115395 BJELOS S RADMILA-DOMACINSTVO 152212 10.4
8 113049 GAVRILOVIC S GORAN-DOMACINSTVO 148607 10.4
9 46973 POPOVIC NINKO-DOMACINSTVO 104573 10.5
10 82283 RASALJ KADRIJA-DOMACINSTVO 66876 10.6
Commercial Data Analysis & Rehabilitation
System Discrepancies
Inconsistencies between customer classifications
A.15: Discrepancies for customers marked as buildings
(account no: 1000082)
Billing
Group
No found in
database
Code Description
1 1 Agriculture, Hunting and Woods SON 12
2 2 fishing SON 22
3 6 Civil Engineer Industry SON 1
4 7 Trade SON 5
5 22 Buildings DDN 88
6 22 Buildings SON 20261
7 22 Buildings SPP 2
8 33 Households DDN 24
9 33 Households SON 471
10 66 Local small shops SON 8
11 EXC Not defined SON 218
12 EXC Not defined SPP 4
where:
SON Households billed by InfoStan
POOS Business in buildings billed by BVK
SPP Industry
DDN Households billed by BVK
UN Unknown
Consumption Category
A.14: Discrepancies between Billing Groups &
Consumption categorieswhere:
SON Households billed by InfoStan
POOS Business in buildings billed by BVK
SPP Industry
DDN Households billed by BVK
Billing
Group
No found in
database
Code Description
1 1 Agriculture, Hunting and Woods DDN 49
2 1 Agriculture, Hunting and Woods POOS 21
3 1 Agriculture, Hunting and Woods SON 68
4 1 Agriculture, Hunting and Woods SPP 1128
5 2 fishing DDN 1
6 2 fishing POOS 1
7 2 fishing SON 24
8 2 fishing SPP 1
9 3 Excavations, Mines DDN 22
10 3 Excavations, Mines POOS 1
11 3 Excavations, Mines SON 39
12 3 Excavations, Mines SPP 5
13 4 Industry DDN 1
14 4 Industry POOS 2
Consumption Category
Commercial Data Analysis & Rehabilitation
Consumption Analysis
Consumption Analysis
(per Consumption Category Group)
13.3%
64.6%
1.1%
7.1%
0.1%
13.8%
0
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
Resid
en
tial-
Bu
ilid
ng
s
Resid
en
tial-
Ho
useh
old
s
Ind
ustr
y
Bu
sin
ess /
Co
mm
erc
ial
Pu
bli
c
Un
kn
ow
n
Mete
red
Co
nsu
mp
tio
n (
m3/d
ay)
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
% n
o o
f co
nn
ecti
on
s
Actual vs Metered Consumption
(per Consumption Category Group)
7%
11%
24%
29%
23%
37%
0.0
5,000.0
10,000.0
15,000.0
20,000.0
25,000.0
30,000.0
Resid
en
tial-
Bu
ilid
ng
s
Resid
en
tial-
Ho
useh
old
s
Ind
ustr
y
Bu
sin
ess /
Co
mm
erc
ial
Pu
bli
c
Un
kn
ow
n
Un
-mete
red
Co
nsu
mp
tio
n (
m3/d
ay)
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
% D
iffe
ren
ce o
f actu
al
vs m
ete
red
co
nsu
mp
tio
n
Objectives
Efficient monitoring of bulk meter operation and monthly evaluation of bulk meter readings.
UFW analysis of Mass Balancing Zones (MBZs) using IWA (International Water Association)
“No-Drop” Legal requirement reporting
Data Requirements/ prerequisites
Commercial Data Evaluation (CDE)
[calculates authorised metered demand and metering inaccuracies –geographically distributed]
Asset register Evaluation (ARE) [defines MBZ]
Bulk Meter Readings [used to calculate supply per zone]
Un-Accounted for
Water Analysis
(UFW)
Unaccounted for Water Analysis (UFW) - Methodology &
Procedures
Objectives & Data Requirements
Activities
Bulk Meter Readings Evaluation
[imported, time series – corrections, flow generations – fill in gaps]
Supply Analysis (per MBZ)
[bulk meter equation/ MBZ – problems with meter locations & readings]
Allocation of demands to pipes and to MBZ
[CDE Demands are allocated to plot => pipes => nodes => zones]
UFW analysis per zone
Supply = metered demand + metering inaccuracies (apparent losses) + unauthorised consumption (assumed) + leakage
Leakage performance is evaluated against IWA standards
Publishing of data on EDAMS Web GIS.
Deliverables
Bulk Meter Evaluation Report
UFW Report
Publishing of data in EDAMS Web-GIS
Unaccounted for Water Analysis (UFW) - Methodology &
Procedures
Objectives & Data Requirements
Unaccounted for Water Analysis (UFW) - Methodology &
Procedures
Reporting
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Bulk Meters Installed and not read
Bulk Meters within Bulk Supply - not read
Bulk Meters within Bulk Supply - read
Bulk Meters within DMA on DJ or FCP- not read
Bulk Meters within DMA on DJ or FCP- read
Bulk Meters within DMA not on DJ or FCP- not read
Bulk Meters within DMA not on DJ or FCP- read
Bulk Meters on DJ/FCP - not read
Bulk Meters on DJ/FCP - read
Bulk Meters on DMA boundary but not on DJ/FCP
Bulk Meters Evaluation - Summary
-
1,000.00
2,000.00
3,000.00
4,000.00
5,000.00
6,000.00
7,000.00
8,000.00
9,000.00
10,000.00
Production VS Billed volume
Total (Ml)
CBS System
CDE Analysis
Totals 3,634,034 161
A Supply Zones that can balance - directly 91,785 11
B Supply Zones that can balance - in groups 294,785 10
C Supply Zones that can balance directly but with zoning problems
(met.dem > supply)
494,572 23
D Supply Zones that can balance in groups but with zoning problems
(met.dem > supply)
144,984 8
E Supply Zones that can balance if readings were taken (and can't be
balanced in groups)
1,123,936 47
F Supply Zones that need additional meters to be able to balance 1,483,971 62
Zone Id NamePipes Length
(m)
number of
zones