iawd asset management regional services hub asset

27
IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub – Asset Management Activities Presented by: Dr. P. Kolovopoulos UTVSI

Upload: others

Post on 19-Nov-2021

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub –

Asset Management Activities

Presented by:

Dr. P. Kolovopoulos

UTVSI

Agenda

AM Hub Centre Operation

AM Hub – AM Activities

Dissemination of a methodology to allow the generation of Management Reports for a utility based upon technical and commercial inputs.

Management guidance, to interpret management reports and formulate appropriate decisions

Assistance in creating effective management reporting at all levels

Utility performance assessment, through the involvement of industry experts to help analyse the Utility’s performance and to identify appropriate remedial and proactive activities

Support for regular System audits, identifying problem areas both with regard to usage of the system and business procedures

IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub

Asset Management Activities

The IAWD AM hub will use the latest available AM technology capitalizing on the development efforts and knowledge built in Belgrade Water Works over the last 10 years.

BWS has already a pool of available resources trained in AM techniques and systems that can provide the services and use the existing infrastructure (EDAMS)

The AM will operate primarily through cloud technology with reduced operational costs, enabling much easier participation of Utilities.

IAWD and BWS will evaluate in the course of the project the development of a business model to maintain and support the activities on a cost recovery basis after the completion of the project.

IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub

Sustainability of Centre /Project

# Muncipality Country

Population

Total

Municipalit

y

Served

by UtilityCoverage

1 Banja Luka Bosnia

Hercegovina

250,000 240,000 96%

2 Kozarska

Dubica

Bosnia

Hercegovina

31,577 20,000 63%

3 Subotica Serbia 141,554 110,832 78%

4 Bijeljina Bosnia

Hercegovina

120,000 75,000 63%

5 Smederevo Serbia 107,652 63,382 59%

6 Budva Montenegro 15,909 75,108 472%

7 Bosanska Krupa Bosnia

Hercegovina

29,659 20,998 71%

8 Gračanica Bosnia

Hercegovina

58,926 20,060 34%

9 Prilep R.Makedonija 76,768 72,378 94%

10 Zenica Bosnia

Hercegovina

138,439 91,000 66%

11 Srebrenik Bosnia

Hercegovina

21,371 17,609 82%

12 Velika Kladuša Bosnia

Hercegovina

47,759 44,421 93%

13 Gornji

Milanovac

Serbia 44,406 38,487 87%

14 Probistip R.Makedonija 16,193 14,024 87%

15 Niksic Montenegro 75,282 73,938 98%

16 Vitez Bosnia

Hercegovina

25,109 17,576 70%

17 Neum Bosnia

Hercegovina

5,174 4,178 81%

18 Cazin Bosnia

Hercegovina

69,411

IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub

Utilities participating in the program

IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub

Parties Involved

Direct access to customers and uploading / downloading of information

through EDAMS-CRM application

EDAMS CRM is a simple, easy to use portal for the exchange of

information between the customers and the center.

IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub

Implementation of Services

All geographical data is published on EDAMS-Web-GIS and Client is given

one free license of the software to use

EDAMS Web GIS is a simple, easy to use web GIS application. Your

selected network can be viewed, queried and analysed, e.g. producing

thematic reporting of water quality at monitoring points.

IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub

Implementation of Services

Utility Assessment & Recommendations

Regular Management Reporting

On-line access to GIS data & reports

Direct support though CRM and assistance

Workshops & training per phase

Dissemination of information through Seminars, papers etc.

IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub

Project Outputs

Frequency of reporting is recommended and can change to suit

requirements

Reports are consolidated to 3-monthly, 6-monthly basis

Access is given to EDAMS-CRM web site for submitting and receiving

reports

Reports are accompanied with excel files and shapefiles for element

reference

Progress reports indicating key indicators of all previous analyses are given

Agenda

AM Hub Centre Operation

AM Hub – AM Activities

IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub

Types of Services

Asset Register Evaluation (ARE)

Commercial Data Evaluation (CDE)

Un-Accounted for Water Analysis (UFW)

Maintenance Records Analysis (MRA)

Financial Assets Evaluation (FAE)

Maintenance & Rehabilitation Planning (MRP)

Objectives

the building up of a Validated Network Asset Register,

[essential for Asset & Maintenance Management & Infrastructure Planning]

Data Requirements

Shapefile of current Network Asset Register,

[if a GIS currently does not exist – the Client should consider the Entry Solution, where EDAMS-GIS/ Network Data Management system is implemented]

Activities

Importing data to EDAMS-NDM

Network Data Evaluation

Hydraulic Zones Definition

Zone Analysis

Publishing of data

Asset Register

Evaluation (ARE)

IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub

Asset Register Evaluation

Network Data Evaluation Report

Zone Evaluation Report

Publishing of data in EDAMS Web-GIS

Desk-top editing

Field Validation

Further Work/ Added Benefits

Deliverables

IAWD Asset Management Regional Services Hub

Asset Register Evaluation

Assets Register Evaluation- Methodology & Procedures

Building & Validating the Asset Registry

Assets Register Evaluation- Methodology & Procedures

Managing Discrepancies

ARE.1 Connectivity Problems

ARE.1.1 List of Chains not allocated to network

ARE.1.2 List of Nodes not allocated to network

ARE.1.3 List of Pipes not allocated to network

ARE.1.4 List of Valves not allocated to network

ARE.1.5 List of Closed Valves on Long chains

ARE.1.6 List of De-commissioned ChainsARE.2 Attribute Problems

ARE.2.1 List of Water Treatment Plants with missing hydraulic attributes

ARE.2.2 List of Tanks / Reservoirs with missing hydraulic attributes

ARE.2.3 List of Pump Stations with missing hydraulic attributes

ARE.2.4 List of Control Valves (PRV) with missing hydraulic attributes

ARE.2.5 Pipes not linked to LibrariesARE.3 Zoning Problems

ARE.3.1 Closed Valves within districts

ARE.3.2 Hydraulic Zones to be investigated

ARE.3.3 Mass Balancing Zones to be investigated

ARE.3.4 Head Zones to be investigated

ARE.3.5 Hydraulic zoning problems

ARE.3.6 Mass Balancing zoning problems

ARE.3.7 Head Zones zoning problems

Assets Register Evaluation- Methodology & Procedures

Managing Discrepancies>Connectivity Problems

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Chains not allocated to zones

Nodes not allocated to Zones

Pipes not allocated to Zones

Valves not allocated to Zones

Closed Valves on Long chains

De-commissioned Chains

Connectivity Problems

ARE 1.4: List of Valves not allocated to networkElement

Id

Element Ref

218 V241

377 V564

726 Valve 25

729 Valve 28

749 Valve 49

3254 Valve 2582

3527 Valve 2859

3600 Valve 2932

18692 Valve 18692

18985 Valve 18985

20965 Valve 20965

21472 Valve 21472

Objectives

Improvement of Commercial data Quality

Consumption Analysis and Identification of problematic meters, connections and meter readings, towards the reduction of UFW-apparent losses

Calculation of present authorised demand, comprising of metered demand and metering inaccuracies

Data Requirements (from Billing system)

Properties database that should include: (1) Property number, (2) Township, (3) Plot number, (4) Consumer Category

Billing Connections database

Billing Meter database (make, size, age)

Billing history-water (12 months): (a) Meter Readings, (b) Meter replacements.

Commercial Data

Evaluation (CDE)

Commercial Data Evaluation- Methodology & Procedures

Objectives & Data Requirements

Activities

Data Conversion (from Utility’s billing system into the EDAMS system)

Exceptions Analysis (missing or inconsistent links between data elements)

Meter reading analysis (2 years historical meter readings). Unreliable meter readings are traced and are flagged.

Authorised demand analysis:

demand per connection = metered demand + metering inaccuracies (losses).

Average demand per consumer type

Consumption analysis: patterns per Township, Per Consumption , Land Use, and Land Usage categories and Per Customer group.

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

633

0 0336

0

3,507

0

952

2,052

1,474

Ml / year

Commercial LossesPublishing of data: CDE results are uploaded into EDAMS Web GIS.

Commercial Data Evaluation- Methodology & Procedures

Objectives & Data Requirements

A comprehensive CDE report that includes:

• Meter Readings Analysis

• Consumption analysis (Metered demand)

• Metering Inaccuracies (Apparent losses)

• High Consumer Analysis

• Meters Analysis

• Estimates Analysis

Lists & shapefiles of problematic meters (stuck, slow, etc.) and meters with problematic readings

Present authorised demand, comprising of metered demand and metering inaccuracies per connection

Published data in EDAMS Web-GIS

Commercial Rehabilitation, including replacement of problematic meters, addressing, high consumers, areas with poor meter readings, etc..

Further Work/ Added Benefits

Deliverables

Commercial Data Evaluation- Methodology & Procedures

Reporting & Deliverables

Commercial Data Evaluation- Methodology & Procedures

Reporting & Deliverables

List of invalid sub-connections (no:103)

Suspect Residential Consumers

Meters with unknown meter size

Meters with unknown attributes (meter type, age, serial no)

Commercial Data Analysis & Rehabilitation

System Discrepancies

A.17: List of invalid sub-connections

(no main connection allocated)

Nadredjena_dopuna_registra

1 3000

2 3461

3 3509

4 3509

5 4982

6 5231

7 5263

8 6196

9 6230

10 6398

11 6539

A.16: List of Suspect Residential Consumers (Consumption > 10 m3/day)

(Category:Households billed by BVK -not buildings)Customer

NumberCustomer Name

Property

Ref

Average Consumption

(m3/day)

Grand total: 4,557.6

1 56906 VELJKOVIC MIODRAG-DOMACINSTVO 149812 10.1

2 64082 KILIBARDA SNEZANA-DOMACINSTVO 102078 10.1

3 98375 KURGAS S NADA-DOMACINSTVO 128747 10.2

4 105644 MRMAK P GORAN-DOMACINSTVO 6718 10.2

5 30336 XVII MZ ''SELO RAKOVICA'' 149984 10.3

6 56472 LECIC MILIVOJE-DOMACINSTVO 46367 10.4

7 115395 BJELOS S RADMILA-DOMACINSTVO 152212 10.4

8 113049 GAVRILOVIC S GORAN-DOMACINSTVO 148607 10.4

9 46973 POPOVIC NINKO-DOMACINSTVO 104573 10.5

10 82283 RASALJ KADRIJA-DOMACINSTVO 66876 10.6

Commercial Data Analysis & Rehabilitation

System Discrepancies

Inconsistencies between customer classifications

A.15: Discrepancies for customers marked as buildings

(account no: 1000082)

Billing

Group

No found in

database

Code Description

1 1 Agriculture, Hunting and Woods SON 12

2 2 fishing SON 22

3 6 Civil Engineer Industry SON 1

4 7 Trade SON 5

5 22 Buildings DDN 88

6 22 Buildings SON 20261

7 22 Buildings SPP 2

8 33 Households DDN 24

9 33 Households SON 471

10 66 Local small shops SON 8

11 EXC Not defined SON 218

12 EXC Not defined SPP 4

where:

SON Households billed by InfoStan

POOS Business in buildings billed by BVK

SPP Industry

DDN Households billed by BVK

UN Unknown

Consumption Category

A.14: Discrepancies between Billing Groups &

Consumption categorieswhere:

SON Households billed by InfoStan

POOS Business in buildings billed by BVK

SPP Industry

DDN Households billed by BVK

Billing

Group

No found in

database

Code Description

1 1 Agriculture, Hunting and Woods DDN 49

2 1 Agriculture, Hunting and Woods POOS 21

3 1 Agriculture, Hunting and Woods SON 68

4 1 Agriculture, Hunting and Woods SPP 1128

5 2 fishing DDN 1

6 2 fishing POOS 1

7 2 fishing SON 24

8 2 fishing SPP 1

9 3 Excavations, Mines DDN 22

10 3 Excavations, Mines POOS 1

11 3 Excavations, Mines SON 39

12 3 Excavations, Mines SPP 5

13 4 Industry DDN 1

14 4 Industry POOS 2

Consumption Category

Commercial Data Analysis & Rehabilitation

Consumption Analysis

Consumption Analysis

(per Consumption Category Group)

13.3%

64.6%

1.1%

7.1%

0.1%

13.8%

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

250000

Resid

en

tial-

Bu

ilid

ng

s

Resid

en

tial-

Ho

useh

old

s

Ind

ustr

y

Bu

sin

ess /

Co

mm

erc

ial

Pu

bli

c

Un

kn

ow

n

Mete

red

Co

nsu

mp

tio

n (

m3/d

ay)

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

% n

o o

f co

nn

ecti

on

s

Actual vs Metered Consumption

(per Consumption Category Group)

7%

11%

24%

29%

23%

37%

0.0

5,000.0

10,000.0

15,000.0

20,000.0

25,000.0

30,000.0

Resid

en

tial-

Bu

ilid

ng

s

Resid

en

tial-

Ho

useh

old

s

Ind

ustr

y

Bu

sin

ess /

Co

mm

erc

ial

Pu

bli

c

Un

kn

ow

n

Un

-mete

red

Co

nsu

mp

tio

n (

m3/d

ay)

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

% D

iffe

ren

ce o

f actu

al

vs m

ete

red

co

nsu

mp

tio

n

Objectives

Efficient monitoring of bulk meter operation and monthly evaluation of bulk meter readings.

UFW analysis of Mass Balancing Zones (MBZs) using IWA (International Water Association)

“No-Drop” Legal requirement reporting

Data Requirements/ prerequisites

Commercial Data Evaluation (CDE)

[calculates authorised metered demand and metering inaccuracies –geographically distributed]

Asset register Evaluation (ARE) [defines MBZ]

Bulk Meter Readings [used to calculate supply per zone]

Un-Accounted for

Water Analysis

(UFW)

Unaccounted for Water Analysis (UFW) - Methodology &

Procedures

Objectives & Data Requirements

Activities

Bulk Meter Readings Evaluation

[imported, time series – corrections, flow generations – fill in gaps]

Supply Analysis (per MBZ)

[bulk meter equation/ MBZ – problems with meter locations & readings]

Allocation of demands to pipes and to MBZ

[CDE Demands are allocated to plot => pipes => nodes => zones]

UFW analysis per zone

Supply = metered demand + metering inaccuracies (apparent losses) + unauthorised consumption (assumed) + leakage

Leakage performance is evaluated against IWA standards

Publishing of data on EDAMS Web GIS.

Deliverables

Bulk Meter Evaluation Report

UFW Report

Publishing of data in EDAMS Web-GIS

Unaccounted for Water Analysis (UFW) - Methodology &

Procedures

Objectives & Data Requirements

Unaccounted for Water Analysis (UFW) - Methodology &

Procedures

Reporting

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

Bulk Meters Installed and not read

Bulk Meters within Bulk Supply - not read

Bulk Meters within Bulk Supply - read

Bulk Meters within DMA on DJ or FCP- not read

Bulk Meters within DMA on DJ or FCP- read

Bulk Meters within DMA not on DJ or FCP- not read

Bulk Meters within DMA not on DJ or FCP- read

Bulk Meters on DJ/FCP - not read

Bulk Meters on DJ/FCP - read

Bulk Meters on DMA boundary but not on DJ/FCP

Bulk Meters Evaluation - Summary

-

1,000.00

2,000.00

3,000.00

4,000.00

5,000.00

6,000.00

7,000.00

8,000.00

9,000.00

10,000.00

Production VS Billed volume

Total (Ml)

CBS System

CDE Analysis

Totals 3,634,034 161

A Supply Zones that can balance - directly 91,785 11

B Supply Zones that can balance - in groups 294,785 10

C Supply Zones that can balance directly but with zoning problems

(met.dem > supply)

494,572 23

D Supply Zones that can balance in groups but with zoning problems

(met.dem > supply)

144,984 8

E Supply Zones that can balance if readings were taken (and can't be

balanced in groups)

1,123,936 47

F Supply Zones that need additional meters to be able to balance 1,483,971 62

Zone Id NamePipes Length

(m)

number of

zones

Questions & Discussion