i tem f11 b – a ppeal n umber a-3-mco-15-0023 carmel area monterey county c alifornia c oastal c...
DESCRIPTION
I TEM F11 B – A PPEAL N UMBER A-3-MCO S LIDE 3 P ROJECT S ITETRANSCRIPT
CISAR IRRIGATION WELLITEM F11B – APPEAL NUMBER A-3-MCO-15-0023
Carmel AreaMonterey County
CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSIONCENTRAL COAST DISTRICT SLIDE 1
ITEM F11B – APPEAL NUMBER A-3-MCO-15-0023 SLIDE 2
PROJECT LOCATION
ITEM F11B – APPEAL NUMBER A-3-MCO-15-0023 SLIDE 3
PROJECT SITE
ITEM F11B – APPEAL NUMBER A-3-MCO-15-0023 SLIDE 4
PROJECT PLANS
ITEM F11B – APPEAL NUMBER A-3-MCO-15-0023 SLIDE 5
APPEAL CONTENTIONS1. Noticing2. Water supply resources3. ESHA4. Erosion and geologic hazards5. Public health and safety
Staff Recommends Substantial Issue
ITEM F11B – APPEAL NUMBER A-3-MCO-15-0023 SLIDE 6
STANDING TO APPEALLCP requires mailed notice to local
agencies expected to provide services to the projectNo notice mailed to Appellant
LCP requires at least 3 public hearing notices to be clearly posted at public places where they are required to be accessible and visible to the publicNotices posted where not publicly accessible or
visibleDisputed facts from Appellant and
Applicant about other “notice”
ITEM F11B – APPEAL NUMBER A-3-MCO-15-0023 SLIDE 7
OTHER SI ISSUESProject does not meet LCP water supply and
intensification of water use requirementsProject lacks LCP-required hydrological analysis and
drought tolerant landscapingProject to provide irrigation for a lawn area and other non-
native plants, all during an extended period of significant drought
Project identifies expanded leach fields within ESHA and project biological analysis does not address potential impacts of the operation of the well on ESHA
Project lacks LCP-required geologic report and does not address potential erosion and geologic concerns
ITEM F11B – APPEAL NUMBER A-3-MCO-15-0023 SLIDE 8
SUBSTANTIAL ISSUE RECOMMENDATION
Appeal contentions raise a substantial issue with respect to the approved
project’s conformance with the Monterey County LCP
(see top of staff report page 4 for SI motion)
ITEM F11B – APPEAL NUMBER A-3-MCO-15-0023 SLIDE 9
DENIALProject does not meet LCP water supply and
intensification of water use requirementsProject lacks LCP-required hydrological analysis and
drought tolerant landscapingProject identifies expanded leach fields within ESHA
and project biological analysis does not address potential impacts of the operation of the well on ESHA
Project lacks LCP-required geologic report and does not address potential erosion and geologic concerns
Project does not meet LCP notice requirementsProject cannot be approved under LCP when there is
an ongoing violation
ITEM F11B – APPEAL NUMBER A-3-MCO-15-0023 SLIDE 10
RECOMMENDATIONThe proposed project is inconsistent
with the LCP and the CDP needs to be denied
(see bottom of staff report page 4 for denial motion)