hyper-v virtualization scenarios for business critical applications v6

8/6/2019 Hyper-V Virtualization Scenarios for Business Critical Applications v6

1/43


2/43

irtualisation Scenarios or Business CriticalApplications


3/43

What We Will Cover

Why Microsoft Virtualization for MicrosoftServer Applications?

SQL Server Virtualization ScenariosConsolidation, BI and HA ScenariosScalability Tests, Best Practices, SizingGuidelines

SharePoint Virtualization Best PracticesExchange Virtualization Best PracticesLinks to Reference Material


4/43

Virtualization Trends

:Source : , ,Virtualization and Management Trends Forecasts and Recommendations ; ( );Enterprise Management Associates EMA April 2008

h a t t y p e s o f w o r k l o a d s h a v e y o u d e p l o y e d v i r t u a l i z a t i o n. e c h n o l o g y f o r 2 0 0 6 v s 2 0 0 8


5/43

Customers are Reaping the

Benefits

,Reduce server sprawl save space Save on power and cooling costs Optimize usage of current hardware resources

Increase availability of business applicationsDelivers cost effective high availability ,Improve service levels less downtime

Rapidly provision business applicationsQuickly test applications Increase administrative flexibility

:ave Costs Improve ResourceUtilization

nh ance d Busin es s Con tinuity

gile and Efficient Management Building a physical server took almost our hours beforevir tual izat ion . - Hyper V has helped

decrease this time to .0 minutes ,i t o F o r t e C h i e f I n f o r m a t i o n

O f f i c e r o r l e y P a r s o n s

We can o longer tolerate service.nterruptions , With virtualization we are creating a redundant data center in

Normandy to ensure business continuity

, ,m au ry P it ro u P ro je ct s A rc hi te c t ur e e sk to ps a nd M ob il i t y D ir ec to r B ou yg ue s

C o n s t r u c t i o n s

By the time we hit our i ft h v ir tu al achine , on a host we ve usually aid

or the host . ,Long term we will be able to reduce our total data center

holdings by .5 percent ,o be rt M cS k i ns ky S en i or S y st em s

,d m i n i s t r a t o r-a r t mo ut h H i t ch co ck M ed ic a l C e n te r


6/43

Microsoft Virtualization for ServerApplications

i rtua l izat ion Pla tform

us in es s C ri ti ca lApplications

anagementPlatform

Enterprise ApplicationsLin

e Of Business (LOB) Custom Applications

Database Communication

usinessApplicat i

ons

MicrosoftServer

Applicat ions

Collaboration

- Hyper V

=i crosof t Vir tual izat ion indows Server 2008

-2 Hyper V+ ystem Center


7/43

Microsoft Virtualization: The Best Choice for MicrosoftServer Applications icrosoft Server icrosoft Server

pplications pplications

uilt for uilt forWindowsindows

ow Cost ow Cost omplete omplete

Solutionolution

omplete omplete anagement anagement

Solutionolution

* &hysical i r tual

Management* r oss Pl atfor m

nd Hy pe rv iso rSupport

* e ep A pp li ca ti onKnowledge

* -uilt in i r tualizat ion

-ith One stopSupport

Increased Deployment Options

* arge artner

Ecosystem

* comparable olution can cost

p to six imes

more* ower

ngoingCosts

-Virtualizationfriendly

Licensing

* nly available with Microsoft irtualization ..Based on a comparison of Microsoft System Center Server Management Suite Datacenter with VMware vSphere Enterprise Plus with VMware vCenter Server Assumes

, , , ..a five host configuration 2 processors on each host 2 years support costs for both products and no operating system costs included The Microsoft solution- .can use either the free Microsoft Hyper V Server 2008 R2 hypervisor or an existing Windows Server 2008 R2 hypervisor Based on Microsoft estimated retail prices and published VMware prices available at :// . . /https www vmware com vmwarestore / / .as of 08 04 2009 for purchases in the United States Actual reseller prices may

.vary
https://www.vmware.com/vmwarestorehttps://www.vmware.com/vmwarestorehttps://www.vmware.com/vmwarestore


8/43

Virtualization Deployment Scenarios for

icrosoft SQL Server


9/43

SQL Server Consolidation

,

H i g

h e r

I s o

l a t i o n

H i g

h e r

C o

s t s

H i

g

h e r

D e n s i

t y

L o w e r

C o s t s

MyServer

DatabasesInstancesIT ManagedEnvironment

VirtualMachines Schemas

Microsoft Confidential

Sales_1

Marketing_1

Online_Sales

ERP_10

ERP_10

DB_1

DB_3DB_2

Consolidate_1

u Currently a variety of consolidation.strategies exist and are utilized

u , ,Typically as isolation goes up density goes.down and operation cost goes up


10/43

Consolidation ConsiderationsMultiple SQL Instances Multiple Virtual Machines (VM)

Isolation Shared Windows instance Dedicated Windows instanceCPU Resources Number of CPUs visible to

Windows instanceUp to 4 virtual CPUsCPU over-commit is supported

Memory Server LimitDynamic(max server memory)

Statically allocated to VM (Offline changes only)64GB limit per VM2 TB Limit per Host

Storage SQL Data Files with standardstorage options SQL Data Files usingPassthrough or Virtual Hard Disks exposed to VM

Resource Management Windows System ResourceManager(process level)SQL Server Resource Governor

Hyper-V guest VMSQL Server Resource Governor

Number of instances 50 Practical limit determined by physical resources

High Availability Clustering, Database Mirroring, Log

Shipping, Replication

Live Migration, Guest Clustering, Database Mirroring, Log

Shipping, Replication

Performance Good Comparable with multiple instances, acceptable overhead


11/43

Virtual Memory & Second-Level TranslationWith Virtualization an additional level of mapping is requiredSecond Level Address Translation (SLAT) provides the extra

translation into Virtual Machine address spacesPerformance advantage over non-enabled CPUs

Physical Memory Pages

/The Virtual Process view /The Physical real view

Virtual Machine 1

Hyper VisorHyper Visor

Virtual Machine 1

Virtual Machine 3

Operating SystemOperating System


12/43

SQL Server ConsolidationScalability

)

% CPU

Throughput(Batch

/ )requests sec

Relative Throughput for Windows Server 2008

HeavyLoad

Moderate

Load

LowLoad

-PU over commit l mo st L in ea r

Scale-o CPU over commit

:esults Increased throughput with consolidation Near linear scale in throughput with no CPU

-over commit mproved e rf orm an ce w it h Win do ws

erver 2008 R2 and SLAT processorarchitecture

:onfiguration : - OS Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper V :Hardware

( )HP DL585 16 core with SLAT HP EVA 8000 storage

:Virtual Machines 4 virtual processors and 7 GB RAM;per virtual machine Fixed size VHD


13/43

SQL Server ConsolidationScalability

:esults -Drop in compatibility of Istanbul processors with

existing infrastructure~ %0 performance improvement with AMD

( )HyperTransport Assist Intel snoop filterfeature

Keep cache coherency traffic between the two sockets from appearing on the external bus

:onfigurationOS: Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 H -yper

VHardware :

(HP DL785 32 , )core and 48 cores withSLAT Hitachi Data Systems AMS2500 Storage

i rt ua l M ac hi ne s : 4 virtual processors and 7;GB RAM per virtual machine Fixed size VHD


14/43

Virtualization for SQL Server BusinessIntelligence :i rt ua li za ti on Benef it s n cr ea se a gi li ty by rapidly provisioning

-and scaling out BI components on demandReduce the number of h ys ic al s er ve rs ,

save on power and space

:cenar io Descr ip ti on ( )Business Intelligence BI components with

lower resource requirements such as Data( ), ,Mart DM OLAP Cube Reporting Servers are

good candidates for scale out and ideal forvirtualization

( ),Operational Data Store ODS Data Warehouse( ),DW SQL Server Integration Services could

be physical or virtual depending on scale uprequirements

,If virtual put SSIS and Data Warehouse on the( )same Virtual Machine VM

ERPxternal

1

2

perational ata Store

We b Legacy

Click Here For More Information

eportingServer

&ata Mart LAP Cube

eportingServer

&ata Mart LAP Cube

VMVM

( )QL Server Integration Services SSIS ( )ata Warehouse DW
http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/white-papers.aspxhttp://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/white-papers.aspxhttp://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/white-papers.aspx


15/43

Remote Site Consolidation with DBMirroring:cenar io Des cr ip ti on Help protect from data loss with SQL

. ,Server Database Mirroring Automatically

failover from primary to standby using

.witness Consolidate mirrored database servers on

standby site with virtualization Use mirrored databases with database

snapshots for reporting Ensure there is enough CPU capacity at the

standby site to provide acceptable SLA upon failover

:i rt ua li za ti on Benef it s Better e rv er u ti li za ti on on tandby

i te due to consolidation Cost effective disaster recovery solution

without using costly specialized hardware Management efficiency based on SQL Server and System Center management tools

2

1

Q L S er ver atabase

Mirroring

2 QL S erv er atabase

Mirroring

3


VMVM

eportingServer

( )B S nap sh ot


16/43

Hyper-V Live Migration Technology in Windows Server 2008 R2 that allows you

to move running VMs from one physical server toanother physical server without disruption of serviceor perceived downtime

Live Migration Process1. Initiated via in-box cluster UI, SCVMM, PowerShell2. VM State/Memory Transfer

a) Create VM on the targetb) Move memory pages from the source to the target via Ethernet

3. Final state transfer and virtual machine restorea) Pause virtual machineb) Move storage connectivity from source host to target host via

Ethernet4. Un-pause & Run

Host 1 Host 2

Blue = ( , )Shared Storage FC iSCSI Yellow = Networking

Green = ( )Live migration networking 1Gb or better


17/43

SQL Server with LiveMigration

haredStorage, ,SCSI SAS

Fibre

LiveMigration

1 2

o st c lu st er

1 2

:cenar io D escr ip ti on Manage high availability with multipathing

and live migration for planned downtime,situations such as hardware and software

maintenance ( )Failover individual virtual machines VMs to other hosts within a cluster by using

(Cluster Shared Volume in Windows Server )2008 R2

Use Microsoft System Center Virtual.Machine Manager for migrations System

Center VMM can perform host compatibility checks before migrations and manage

.multiple Live Migrations with queues -Nodes in cluster can be active active Ensure there is enough CPU capacity for the

failover nodes in cluster

:i rt ua li za ti on B en ef it s o loss of service during failover

.with live migration Migration is completely transparent to the user

Improve availability with esscomplexity

Better e rv er u ti li za t io n due toconsolidation

Easier set up and management through System Center VMM


VMVM


18/43

Performance & Resource

Optimization


19/43

PRO Pack Technologies

Partner PRO Technology

Brocade Monitor IO performance from the server to the data in the SAN

Dell The PRO-enabled Dell Management Pack ensures that host machines operate under normal power and temperature thresholds. Other PRO alerts include memory, storage controller, anddisk remediation.Citrix Workflows can be initiated to automatically start or provision VMs based on an entitys healthand automatically update NetScaler load balancing rules

Emulex Monitor I/O rates across the HBA relative to maximum available bandwidth

HP Monitor the following attributes of their servers: hard drive, array controller, power,temperature, processor, memory, fans, and alert on degradation or critical errors providing theappropriate recommended resolutionQuest Software For non-Windows Operating Systems and non-Microsoft application technologies, the solutionenables intelligent virtual machine tuning

Secure Vantage Extends the native capabilities of Security Management providing users the ability to mitigaterisk and remediate policy violations across virtual environments

i rtual Machine Manager RO Packs

,For complete list visit-htt www microsoft com s stemcenter virtualmachinemana er en us ro artners as x
http://www.microsoft.com/systemcenter/virtualmachinemanager/en/us/pro-partners.aspxhttp://www.microsoft.com/systemcenter/virtualmachinemanager/en/us/pro-partners.aspxhttp://www.ibm.com/itsolutions/virtualization/?cm_re=masthead-_-business-_-bzn-virtualhttp://www.microsoft.com/systemcenter/virtualmachinemanager/en/us/pro-partners.aspx


20/43

-Hyper V ConfigurationGuidelinesHyper-V Root Configuration

Plan for 1GB+ memory reserve for the management OS inthe root partition

Plan for one dedicated NIC for management purposesPlan (ideally) for one dedicated NIC for live migrationSeparate LUNs/Arrays for management OS, guest OS VHDs

and VM storageManagement OS and VHD LUNs should employ RAID to

provide data protection and performanceChallenge for blades with 2 physical disks

Hyper-V Guest ConfigurationFixed-sized VHDs for Virtual OSNeed to account for page file consumption in addition to OS

requirementsOS VHD Size (minimum 15GB) + VM Memory Size = MinimumVHD size

Account for space needed by additional files by VM

Example for SQL: OS VHD Size + (VM Memory Size) + DataFiles + Log Files


21/43

SQL Server Best PracticesGuest virtual machines are limited to 4 CPUcores

Best performance if VMs are not over-committed for CPU

Test Network intensive applications foracceptable SLAs

Use multi-pathing on host or within the VM toensure maximum throughput and highavailability for VM workloads

Utilize either pass-through disk or fixed-sizeVHD for guest virtual machinesAvoid using emulated devices. Instead, ensureintegration components are installed andsynthetic devices are being used.


22/43

V irtu a liza tion D ep loym en t S cen arios fo r

icrosoft Office SharePointServer


23/43

What is a SharePoint Farm? hat is a SharePoint Farm?

A collection of one or more SharePoint Servers and SQL Servers providing a set of basic SharePoint services bound

together by a single configuration database in SQL Server

:ey C om ponen ts ( ) : Web Front End WFE Servers

o Windows SharePoint Serviceso Web Application Service

:Application Serverso Office SharePoint Server

Search Service( )Index or Query

o Document Conversion LauncherServiceo Document Conversion Load

Balancer Serviceo Excel Calculation Services

SQL Server


24/43

&SharePoint Roles VirtualizationConsiderations

Role VirtualizationDecision

Considerations and Requirements

Web RoleRender Content

Ideal Easily provision additional servers for load balancing and faulttolerance

Query RoleProcess Search Queries

Ideal ,For large indexes use physical volume over dynamic expanding VHD

Requires propagated copy of local index

Application RoleExcel Forms Services

Ideal Provision more servers as resource requirements for individual applications increase

Index RoleCrawl Index

Consider Environments where significant amount of content is notcrawled Requires enough drive space to store the index corpus

Database Role Consider Environments with lower resource usage requirements Implement SQL Server alias for the farm required

,For details see SharePoint Virtualization whitepaper at

:// . . / / / - -http www microsoft com virtualization solutions business critical applications
http://www.microsoft.com/virtualization/solutions/business-critical-applicationshttp://www.microsoft.com/virtualization/solutions/business-critical-applicationshttp://www.microsoft.com/virtualization/solutions/business-critical-applicationshttp://www.microsoft.com/virtualization/solutions/business-critical-applications


25/43

&Production Farm Physical Virtual Mix

:cenar io D escr ip ti on -Optimized scenario for high end production is mixed physical and

virtual Index and database roles on

dedicated physical servers to provide very high scalability

, ,Virtual web query and applicationroles

All servers managed by System Center Suite

:i rt ua li za ti on B en ef it s n if ie d m an ag em en t : physical

and virtual

ynamic data center : scale-dynamically and on demandprovisioning

TEST

DE V

PRODUCTION

haredStorage

, ,SCSI SASFibre

Click Here for More Information

Failov r

Server

VMVM

Index

P t E id Sh P i t
http://blogs.msdn.com/uksharepoint/archive/2009/03/04/topic-1-recommendations-for-optimizing-the-performance-of-a-virtualized-sharepoint-environment.aspxhttp://blogs.msdn.com/uksharepoint/archive/2009/03/04/topic-1-recommendations-for-optimizing-the-performance-of-a-virtualized-sharepoint-environment.aspxhttp://blogs.msdn.com/uksharepoint/archive/2009/03/04/topic-1-recommendations-for-optimizing-the-performance-of-a-virtualized-sharepoint-environment.aspx


26/43

:Partner Evidence SharePointVirtualization

:ource EMC Virtual Architecture for Microsoft Office SharePoint Server 2007 Enabled by- ( )Hyper V whitepaper Click here for more information

I RT UA L M AC HI NE S PE CI FIC AT IO NS Index server : ,dedicated for crawling 4 CPUs 6 GB RAM per VM & :0 Web Front End Query servers ,4 CPUs 4 GB RAM per VM Appli ca tion serve rs : ,2 CPUs 2 GB RAM per VM Domain con trol le rs : ,2 CPUs 2 GB RAM per VM

DESCRIPTION Deployment with mix of&physical virtual

servers

, Web Query and Application roles are;deployed virtual

database role is deployed physical Maintains resource

optimization with PRO

RESULTS Average response time of -nder 3 5

seconds with %oncurrency with a

heavy user load profile of ver 300K

ser capacity
http://www.emc.com/collateral/hardware/technical-documentation/h5926-virtual-architecture-ms-sharepoint-clariion-cx3-40-hyper-v-ref-arch.pdfhttp://www.emc.com/collateral/hardware/technical-documentation/h5926-virtual-architecture-ms-sharepoint-clariion-cx3-40-hyper-v-ref-arch.pdfhttp://www.emc.com/collateral/hardware/technical-documentation/h5926-virtual-architecture-ms-sharepoint-clariion-cx3-40-hyper-v-ref-arch.pdf


27/43

SharePoint Virtualization BestPracticesBest Practices and Recommendations

CPU Configure a 1-to-1 mapping of virtual processor to logical processors for best performanceBe aware of CPU bound issues

Memory Ensure enough memory is allocated to each virtual machine

Disk Be aware of underlying disk read write contention between different virtual machines to their virtual harddisksEnsure SAN is configured correctly

Network Use VLAN tagging for securityAssociate SharePoint virtual machines to the same virtual switch

Others

Ensure that integration components are installed on the virtual machineDo not use other host roles (use server core)Avoid single point of failure: load balance your virtual machines across hosts and cluster virtual machines


28/43

Virtualization Deployment Scenarios for

icrosoft Exchange Server

D l R d i


29/43

Deployment Recommendations

Exchange application is not virtualizationawareCore Exchange Design Principles Still Apply

Design for Performance, Reliability and Capacity

Design for Usage Profiles (CAS/MBX)Design for Message Profiles (Hub/Edge)

Virtualization Design Principles Now Apply Design for Performance, Reliability and Capacity

Virtual machines should be sized specific to theExchange role (EDGE, HUB, CAS, MBX, multi-role)

Hosts should be sized to accommodate theguests that they will support


30/43


31/43

Mailbox Server GuidelinesDatabase Cacherequirements are the

same for physical andvirtual deploymentsTotal Send + Receive(75k message size)

Database CachePer Mailbox (MB)

50 3100 6150 9200 12250 15300 18350 21

400 24450 27500 30

Total Send +Receive(75k message size)

Users Per CorePhysical MBXRole

Users Per VPVirtual MBX Role

50 1000 900100 900 810150 800 720200 700 630250 600 540300 500 450

350 400 360400 300 270

Virtual Processor Logical Processor Hypervisor and the VirtualizationStack consume CPU Reduce recommended MBX

count by ~10%

M ilb S C fi i


32/43

Mailbox Storage ConfigurationVirtual SCSI (passthrough or fixed disk)

Recommended configuration for database andlog volumes

iSCSI

Standard best practice for iSCSI connectedstorage apply (dedicated NIC, jumbo frames,offload, etc.)

iSCSI initiator in the guest is supported butneed to account for reduced performance

E h 2010 Hi h A il bili


33/43

Exchange 2010 High Availability

Database Availability Group (DAG)A group of up to 16 Exchange Server 2010 Mailboxservers that provide automatic database-levelrecovery

Uses continuous log replication and a subset of Windows Failover Clustering technologies

Can extend across multiple datacenters/AD sites

Benefits of Exchange Native DataProtection

Protection from database, server or network failureAutomatic failover protection and manual

switchover control is provided at the mailboxdatabase level instead of at the server level.

Support for up to 16 copies, support for lag copies

H t B d F il Cl t i


34/43

Host Based Failover Clustering

Host Based Failover Clustering HAUsing Host Based Failover Clustering and automaticallyfailing VMs to an alternate cluster node in the event of a critical hardware issue (virtualization platformindependent)

What you need to be aware of:Not an Exchange Aware SolutionOnly protects against server hardware/network

failureNo HA in the event of storage failure / data

corruption Trend is larger mailboxes = larger database sizes =

longer time to recover from data loss = DAG

Not supported for MBX VMs that are members of aDAG

Li Mi ti d E h


35/43

Live Migration and Exchange2010

Physical Computer MaintenanceOperating System/Application Updates

Hardware Maintenance

Rebalancing WorkloadsDynamic Redistribution of VMs to optimizeworkload on physical hardware

Green ITOff Peak Virtual Machine Consolidation

S t G id li


36/43

Support Guidelines

TechNet is the single source:http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc794548.aspx

SVVP Support Policy Wizard is a greattool:http://www.windowsservercatalog.com/svvp.aspx?svvppage=svvpwizard.htm

Always confirm SPW results with our TechNetarticle

Check back for updatesClarifications published frequently

S t bilit Q i k R f


37/43

Supportability Quick Reference Exchange 2010

SupportedRoot: Hyper-V or any virtualization platform in SVVPGuest:

Exchange 2010Windows 2008 SP2 or R2Mailbox, Client Access, Hub Transport, Edge rolesMeets basic Exchange system requirementsStorage is fixed VHD, SCSI pass through, or iSCSI

Not SupportedCombination of Exchange Mailbox HA (i.e. Mailbox servers in a DAG)

and any host/hypervisor-based clustering or migration technologies

(e.g. Microsoft Live Migration, VMware V-Motion, etc.)Snapshots, differencing/delta disksUnified Messaging roleVirtual/logical processor ratio greater than 2:1Applications running in root partition (excluding AV)


38/43

Partner Evidence: ExchangeVirtualizationHP recommended configurations for

Exchange 2010 virtualization usingHyper-V R2Sizing for 20,000 users, 512 MB mailboxes

All roles virtualized and Live Migration for MBX

serversHardware: HP ProLiant BL460c G6 (BL460c G6)server blade and HP StorageWorks 8400Enterprise Virtual Array (EVA8400) storagesystems

http://h20195.www2.hp.com/V2/GetPDF.aspx/4AA1-2127ESizing for 5,000 users, 256 MB mailboxes

All roles virtualized and Live Migration for MBXservers

Hardware: HP ProLiant BL460c G6 (BL460c G6)server blades and HP LeftHand P4500 (P4500)
http://h20195.www2.hp.com/V2/GetPDF.aspx/4AA1-2127ENW.pdfhttp://h20195.www2.hp.com/V2/GetPDF.aspx/4AA1-2127ENW.pdf


39/43

For More InformationVirtualization

Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2008/en/us/hyperv-main.aspx

Windows Virtualization Team Blog http://blogs.technet.com/virtualization

Infrastructure Planning and Design Guides for Virtualization http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/solutionaccelerators/ee395429.aspx?SA_CE=VIRhttp://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/solutionaccelerators/ee395429.aspx?SA_CE=VIR

Microsoft Virtualization Solutions http://www.microsoft.com/virtualization/en/us/solution-business-apps.aspx

ExchangeExchange Virtualization Best Practices Webcast

http://msevents.microsoft.com/CUI/WebCastEventDetails.aspx?culture=en-US&Even

Exchange Server 2010 Guidance http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb124558(EXCHG.140).aspx

Exchange Team Blog http://blogs.technet.com/exchange
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2008/en/us/hyperv-main.aspxhttp://blogs.technet.com/virtualizationhttp://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/solutionaccelerators/ee395429.aspx?SA_CE=VIRT-IPD-WEB-MSCOM-2009-09-21http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/solutionaccelerators/ee395429.aspx?SA_CE=VIRT-IPD-WEB-MSCOM-2009-09-21http://www.microsoft.com/virtualization/en/us/solution-business-apps.aspxhttp://www.microsoft.com/virtualization/en/us/solution-business-apps.aspxhttp://msevents.microsoft.com/CUI/WebCastEventDetails.aspx?culture=en-US&EventID=1032428204&CountryCode=UShttp://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb124558(EXCHG.140).aspxhttp://blogs.technet.com/exchangehttp://blogs.technet.com/exchangehttp://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb124558(EXCHG.140).aspxhttp://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb124558(EXCHG.140).aspxhttp://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb124558(EXCHG.140).aspxhttp://msevents.microsoft.com/CUI/WebCastEventDetails.aspx?culture=en-US&EventID=1032428204&CountryCode=UShttp://www.microsoft.com/virtualization/en/us/solution-business-apps.aspxhttp://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/solutionaccelerators/ee395429.aspx?SA_CE=VIRT-IPD-WEB-MSCOM-2009-09-21http://blogs.technet.com/virtualizationhttp://blogs.technet.com/virtualizationhttp://blogs.technet.com/virtualizationhttp://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2008/en/us/hyperv-main.aspxhttp://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2008/en/us/hyperv-main.aspxhttp://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2008/en/us/hyperv-main.aspx


40/43

For More InformationSQL Server

SQL Server Virtualization :// . . / / / / / .h ttp w w w m icrosoft com sq lserve r 2 0 0 8 en u s virtu a liza tion aspxSQL Server Whitepapers

:// . . / / / / / - .h ttp w w w m icroso ft com sqlserve r 2 0 0 8 en u s w h ite p ap e rs asp x

SQL Server Virtualization Best Practices Webcast

:// . . / / . =h ttp m seve n ts m icrosoft com C U I W e b C a stE ve n tD e ta ils a spx?Ev e n tID 1 0 3 2 4

SharePointSolutions for Optimizing SharePoint

:// . . / / / / - -h ttp w w w m icrosoft com system cen te r e n u s m an ag in g m icroso ft ap p lica tion s

Microsoft Virtualization Solutions

http://www.microsoft.com/virtualization/en/us/solution-business-apps.aspx

Microsoft Consulting Services UK SharePoint Blog :// . . / / / / / / - -http blog s m sdn com uksha rep oin t archive 2 0 0 9 0 3 0 4 top ic 1 recom m en da ti
http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/virtualization.aspxhttp://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/virtualization.aspxhttp://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/white-papers.aspxhttp://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/white-papers.aspxhttp://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/white-papers.aspxhttp://msevents.microsoft.com/CUI/WebCastEventDetails.aspx?EventID=1032428764&EventCategory=5&culture=en-US&CountryCode=UShttp://msevents.microsoft.com/CUI/WebCastEventDetails.aspx?EventID=1032428764&EventCategory=5&culture=en-US&CountryCode=UShttp://www.microsoft.com/systemcenter/en/us/managing-microsoft-applications/optimizing-sharepoint.aspxhttp://www.microsoft.com/systemcenter/en/us/managing-microsoft-applications/optimizing-sharepoint.aspxhttp://www.microsoft.com/virtualization/en/us/solution-business-apps.aspxhttp://www.microsoft.com/virtualization/en/us/solution-business-apps.aspxhttp://blogs.msdn.com/uksharepoint/archive/2009/03/04/topic-1-recommendations-for-optimizing-the-performance-of-a-virtualized-sharepoint-environment.aspxhttp://blogs.msdn.com/uksharepoint/archive/2009/03/04/topic-1-recommendations-for-optimizing-the-performance-of-a-virtualized-sharepoint-environment.aspxhttp://blogs.msdn.com/uksharepoint/archive/2009/03/04/topic-1-recommendations-for-optimizing-the-performance-of-a-virtualized-sharepoint-environment.aspxhttp://www.microsoft.com/virtualization/en/us/solution-business-apps.aspxhttp://www.microsoft.com/systemcenter/en/us/managing-microsoft-applications/optimizing-sharepoint.aspxhttp://msevents.microsoft.com/CUI/WebCastEventDetails.aspx?EventID=1032428764&EventCategory=5&culture=en-US&CountryCode=UShttp://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/white-papers.aspxhttp://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/virtualization.aspx


41/43

. . /www microsoft com teched

- &Sessions On Demand Community

:// . /http microsoft com technet Resources for IT Professionals

:// . /http microsoft com msdn Resources for Developers

. . /www microsoft com learning

&Microsoft Certification Training

Resources

Resources n

.ne
http://www.microsoft.com/techedhttp://www.microsoft.com/techedhttp://microsoft.com/technethttp://microsoft.com/technethttp://microsoft.com/msdnhttp://microsoft.com/msdnhttp://www.microsoft.com/learninghttp://www.microsoft.com/learninghttp://www.microsoft.com/learninghttp://microsoft.com/msdnhttp://microsoft.com/technethttp://www.microsoft.com/teched


42/43

valuation on CommNet and enter to win!valuation on CommNet and enter to win!


43/43

. . , , / . . / 2009 Microsoft Corporation All rights reserved Microsoft Windows Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and or trademarks in the U S and or other.countries

.The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation Because Microsoft must respond, ,to changing market conditions it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after

. , , , .the date of this presentation MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES EXPRESS IMPLIED OR STATUTORY AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION

hyper-v virtualization scenarios for business critical applications v6

Documents