hyper-v 3.0 – what’s new in windows server 2012? brien posey twitter: @bckpacademy
TRANSCRIPT
Hyper-V 3.0 – What’s New in Windows Server 2012?
Brien Poseyhttp://www.backupacademy.com
Twitter: @BckpAcademy
About Me
Freelance technical author and industry analyst
9 time Microsoft MVP for File Systems / Storage, Exchange Server, Windows Server, and IIS
Formerly a CIO for a national chain of hospitals and healthcare facilities
Network engineer for the Department of Defense at Fort Knox
Network administrator for some of the nation’s largest insurance companies
Hyper-V Release History
Windows Server 2008 – Hyper-V 1.0
● Basic functionality only
Windows Server 2008 R2 – Hyper-V 2.0
● Live migration
● Memory over commitment
Windows Server 2012 – Hyper-V 3.0
● Hundreds of new features
● The hypervisor becomes enterprise class
Standalone / Service
Hyper-V is offered as a free, standalone product OR as a service that runs on Windows Server
This presentation will focus solely on Hyper-V as a service
Microsoft Finally Got it Right!
Enterprise class features that are comparable to VMware vSphere 5
The same simple interface
Memory Ballooning
Hyper-V 2.0 introduced memory over commitment
Memory over commitment increases virtual machine density
Minimum memory and startup memory were the same things in Hyper-V 2.0. A VM always started with the minimum memory
An idle VM may use less memory than is required at startup
Hyper-V 3.0 differentiates between minimum memory and startup memory
Live Migration
Live migration was first introduced in Hyper-V 2.0
Live migration allowed a running virtual machine to be moved to another host without being taken off line
In Hyper-V 2.0, live migration was a serial operation. Only one VM could be live migrated
In Hyper-V 3.0 multiple virtual machines can be live migrated simultaneously
The administrator sets the concurrent live migration threshold based on the available bandwidth, but Hyper-V 3.0 supports an unlimited number of concurrent live migrations
Live Migrations Beyond the Cluster
Previously it was only possible to live migrate a VM to a cluster node
Hyper-V 3.0 makes it possible to live migrate a VM to a host that exists outside of the cluster. This is called Shared Nothing Live Migration
Shared Nothing Live Migration should not be used as a long term replacement for traditional failover clustering
Shared Nothing Live Migration
Requirements:
● At least 2 Hyper-V 3.0 hosts
● Each server requires adequate storage (local or remote SMB)
● Hosts must have the same family or type of processor if you are using the processor compatibility feature
● Hosts must exist in the same AD domain
● The hosts must be connected by a gigabit or faster network link
● Hosts must have Client for Microsoft Networks and File and Print Sharing for Microsoft Networks enabled
● Pass through storage cannot be used
● The same virtual switch configuration must exist on each host
No Shared Storage Requirement
Live Migration in Hyper-V 2.0 required the use of shared storage
Shared storage is recommended, but not required in Hyper-V 3.0
SharedStorage
VM VM
Host 1 Host 2
VM
Failover Clustering
Microsoft has made numerous changes to failover clustering in Hyper-V
The most significant change is the ability to create clusters without shared storage
Microsoft has also made scalability improvements (which will be discussed later)
Storage Migrations
Live storage migration replaces Hyper-V 2.0 Quick Storage Migration
Storage migration is different from live migration. It is designed to move a virtual machine from one storage location to another, not from one host to another
In Hyper-V 2.0 there was a brief outage that occurred at the end of a storage migration
In Hyper-V 3.0 storage migrations occur without down time
Hyper-V Replica
Replicate a running virtual machine to an alternate host
Replication can occur near real time with an adjustable schedule
The Replica feature works well in high latency environments or in environments where connectivity is not always reliable
Hyper-V replica is not a fail over clustering solution. It is a disaster recovery solution
Virtual Fibre Channel
Virtual Fibre Channel allows VMs to connect directly to Fibre Channel storage through a virtual SAN
Virtual Fibre Channel is based on N_Port ID Virtualization (NPIV) mapping
Physical Host Bus Adapters must support NPIV and must be connected to an NPIV enabled SAN
Each Host Bus Adapter must be assigned two World Wide Names in order to facilitate Live Migration
Scalability Improvements
Hyper-V 3.0 is far more scalable than Hyper-V 2.0
Hyper-V 2.0 Hyper-V 3.0
Maximum Virtual CPUs per VM 4 32
Maximum memory per VM 64 GB 512 GB
Maximum Virtual Hard Disk Size 2 TB 16 TB with VHDX
Cluster Scalability
There are also numerous improvements to cluster scalability
Hyper-V 2.0 Hyper-V 3.0
The maximum number of virtual machines per host that can be powered on at any given time
384 1024
Maximum number of virtual machines in a cluster 1000 4000
Maximum number of hosts per cluster 16 64
Maximum RAM per host server 1 TB 2 TB
Snapshots
Hyper-V has had snapshot capabilities since the first version
Accumulating snapshots can impact read performance and can complicate backup / restoration operations
In previous versions of Hyper-V, VMs had to be shut down to remove snapshots that were no longer needed
Hyper-V 3.0 can perform snapshot merges while the VM is running
Hot Adding Resources
Hot resource allocation is new to Hyper-V 3.0
It allows additional hardware resources to be allocated to a VM while it is running
Hot resource allocation is available for memory and disks
CPU cores cannot be hot allocated
NIC Teaming
Hyper-V 2.0 supported NIC teaming only at the hardware level (Intel and Broadcom only)
Hyper-V 3.0 has native support for NIC teaming at the software level. This allows commodity NICs to be teamed
NIC teaming allows for high bandwidth and fault tolerant connections
Teams can include NICs from multiple vendors
Deduplication
Deduplication is actually a Windows Server 2012 feature, not a Hyper-V feature
It is possible to deduplicate VHD libraries, ISOs, and live VHD volumes
Deduplication reduces physical storage requirements and can make using solid state storage more practical
SMB Support
VMs can now be stored on SMB shares
SMB storage is easier to configure than Fibre Channel or iSCSI, but there are limits
● Legacy SMB is not supported
● Scaling is bandwidth dependent
● SMB storage is intended primarily for smaller environments, although it will support larger workloads with the use of high end hardware
Affinity and Anti-Affinity Rules
Affinity and anti-affinity rules control virtual machine failover
Affinity rules can be used to ensure that certain virtual machines always failover together
Anti-affinity rules can prevent certain VMs from ever failing over to a common host
VM prioritization will prioritize VM startup when a failover occurs to an overloaded host
Offload Data Transfer
Virtual machine copy operations can be resource intensive
In SAN environments Hyper-V 3.0 will support Offload Data Transfer (ODX)
This will allow the storage hardware to do the heavy lifting
ODX support is built in. There is no “enable ODX” button
Extensible Virtual Switch
In previous versions of Hyper-V the virtual switch was nearly impossible to monitor or manage
Management software saw the virtual switch as a black box
Vendors can extend the Hyper-V virtual switch to work with their wares
Enjoy and share this material
Feel free to promote this material
Recommend your peers to pass certification
Blog, Tweet and share this material and your experience on Facebook
You’re an Expert? We will be happy to have you as Backup Academy contributor. Apply here
Web: http://www.backupacademy.comE-mail: [email protected]: BckpAcademyFacebook: backup.academy