hunter-gatherers characteristics
DESCRIPTION
Hunter-gatherers Characteristics. For each of these you should know : what it means how/why it is adaptive for their chosen subsistence strategy h ow it relates to / affects the other characteristics on the list. mobility small group size food sharing egalitarianism communal property - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Hunter-gatherersCharacteristics
• mobility• small group size• food sharing• egalitarianism• communal property• rarity of warfare
For each of these you should know:
what it meanshow/why it is adaptive for
their chosen subsistence strategy
how it relates to / affects the other characteristics on the list
Use p. 413-417 to complete your explanations. I will come around and award classwork points for completing this assignment.
Be sure to include the following in your notes:
• definition of carrying capacity• how hunter-gatherers keep populations low –
this answer refers to a biological adaptation not just a cultural one
• the only status differences among hunter-gatherers (hint: there are two)
• hunter-gatherers and surplus• hunter-gatherers and a concept of land
ownership
Hunter-gatherersCharacteristics
• rarity of warfare• How do you define war?• Early ethnographies - !Kung, Mbuti Pygmies – reported
few deadly conflicts.• Carol Ember (1970s)– 64% - war at least once every two years– 26% - war less often– 10% - war extremely rare
• Lawrence Keeley (1990s)– 25-30% adult males die violently– That’s the same as 2 billion deaths in the 20th C.
Hunter-gatherersCharacteristics
rarity of warfare?
• Why do we care?
• Whether war is frequent or rare reveals what about hunter-gatherers’ nature?
• Why would we want to know whether hunter-gatherers are naturally violent or not?• What subsistence strategy have most humans used for
most of history?
Hunter-gatherersCharacteristics
rarity of warfare?
• Why would we want to compare rates of violence of our ancestors (hunter-gatherers) to rates of violence in modern society?
• What do anthropologists have to assume about modern hunter-gatherers in order to understand whether modern society has made us more or less violent?
Tlingit• grasslands /
semi-arid desert• semi-abundant
resources: both hunting & gathering
!Kung Inuit (Netsilik)
• temperate rainforest / sea coast
• very abundant resources: mostly hunting & fishing
• tundra / sea coast
• scarce resources: most calories from hunting
• live in settled communities with permanent housing?• believe in 3 gods – one hates humans, the other is a
moody baby, and the last one just sorta puts up with humans?
• are able to accumulate some personal wealth?• near gender equality: neither gender is dominant?• work an average of 17 hours per week?
Which one: !Kung, Tlingit, or Inuit (Netsilik)?
Anthropology became a field of study in the 1800s. The first anthropologists described hunter-gatherers as inferior, primitive savages.
STEREOTYPES• culturally poor: no art, no literature, etc.• Ignorant & primitive• very low status for women• must slave long hours just to get the bare minimum to survive• are unhealthy
Hunter-gatherers are SAVAGES!
The myth of the NOBLE SAVAGE arose later among anthropologists and romanticized hunter-gatherers as the ideal human, far superior to us.
STEREOTYPES• They share everything and live in perfectly harmonious, close-
knit groups.• They have a deeper respect for the environment.• Their lifestyle is much healthier than ours.
Hunter-gatherers are NOBLE SAVAGES.