humanitarian assistance from the perspective of...

11
HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF DIPLOMACY Setsuko KAWAHARA Professor, Graduate School of Law, Hitotsubashi University (Former Director, Humanitarian Assistance and Emergency Relief Division, MOFA ) *All views expressed are purely personal ones and don’t represent the government at all.

Upload: phamlien

Post on 27-May-2019

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF DIPLOMACY

Setsuko KAWAHARA

Professor, Graduate School of Law, Hitotsubashi University

(Former Director, Humanitarian Assistance and Emergency Relief Division, MOFA )

*All views expressed are purely personal ones and don’t represent the government at all.

IHL and HA●IHL and HA = 2 sides of 1 coin

• History: “Un Souvenir de Solferino” by Henry Dunant

• Humanitarian catastrophe + realistic view (war can’t be abolished)

• Resolution of Geneva International Conference, 1863

(establishment of a Committee to assist Army Medical Service for treatment of wounded soldiers) 1st organization for HA

• Geneva Convention, 1864

(military hospitals shall be neutral + wounded combatants, regardless of nationalities, should be cared for and returned. ) 1st IHL

●Common objective: mitigate the human damages & sufferings

●Difference: IHA(armed conflicts)vs. HA(armed conflicts + natural disasters)

Change of focus in IHL and HA• Traditional war: soldiers vs.

soldiers in war fields

• Focus: mitigate damages and sufferings of soldiers

• Modern war: devastating damage by modern weapons ⇒civilian casualties (unintentional)

• Internal conflicts in post Cold War:

⇒attack to civilians and hindrance of HA as strategic means

・Focus: mitigate damages to civilians

War field

Main actors of IHL and HAIHL

• ICRC(guardian+promotion)

• Governments(create IHL, interpret and implement IHL)

• Parties to the conflict(obliged to respect and comply with IHL)

HA

• ICRC, IFRC, national societies

• UN organs(UNICEF, UNHCR, WFP, UNOCHA, UNRWA etc.)

• Governments

• NGOs(international, domestic)

• Private sector(donation + in-kind contribution)

• Citizens(donation)・Everybody should work together!・Many common basic principles and guidelines were created.

HA by governments: 3 tools(Japan’s case)①Personnel/team

• Natural disaster: Rescue, medical team + SDF(medical, transportation)

• Armed conflict: necessary personnel + SDF(transportation etc.)

②Relief goods/equipment

• Natural disaster: tent, blanket, generator, water purifier etc.

• Armed conflict: same as above

③Funding

• Natural disaster & conflict: funding to international organizations, ICRC, IFRC, affected governments, NGOs.

PKO Act

JDR Act

JICA Act

Funding Mechanism

6

citizen/tax payer

Governments Red CrossUN agencies

NGOs

affected people/government

donationdonation

Budget from taxation

donation

contract

contribution contribution

contribution

blue line : financial flow, red line : delivery of services

ccCoordination on the ground!

Global Principles on HA●Fundamental Principles: Neutrality, Independence, Impartiality, Humanity

⇒NIHA (4 among 7 principles agreed at international conference, 1965 )

●Basic Principles on HA by governments: based on the request/consent of the government of the affected country ⇔unlawful intervention

●Principles on HA by military

①based on the request/consent

②last resort(only in cases civilian capacity can’t meet the humanitarian needs)

③in principle, unarmed

●Principles on Funding by governments(Good Humanitarian Donorship)

①based on the needs

②speedy, flexible funding

③preferably un-earmarking

Related to NIHA Principles

Challenge 1 : consent of the government●2/27 (Sat) Earthquake, M 8.8 at 3 p.m.(Japan T)・Japan offered assistance by diplomatic channel・Statement of President on TV: ①78 deaths, ②will not accept/request foreign assistance●2/28 (Sun) • Strong domestic criticism to the statement• Increase of victims to 700 deaths• Domestic pressure to receive assistance ●3/1(Mon)• Diplomatic Note requesting GOJ to send “field

hospital(hospital campagna)”• Decided to send a medical team, it departed Narita●3/2(Tue)• Chili declined to accept the medical team 27 February, 2010, Chilean earthquake

Challenge 2: security of HA workers

• 13 Jan(Japan T), 2010 Haiti Earthquake (M 7.0)

• Immediately decided on financial contribution & relief items

• News: collapse of UN office, death of the Head of MINUSTA and many UN staff, break up of jails, thousands of prisoners escaped

• Japan’s Law: prohibition on carrying arms by police and SDF staff when deployed for HA in natural disasters

• Gave up deployment of the rescue team

• In stead, decided the deployment of a civilian medical team & SDF medical unit (protected by foreign PKO troops) UN Headquarters in Haiti,

January 2010

Challenge 3: neutrality and impartiality• Governments play a crucial role as donors

in making financial assistance

• Ideal: completely neutral, impartial, purely based on needs assessed by HA organs ⇒no-earmark, rely on HA organs

• Reality: accountability (difficulty in explaining needs and outcomes), diplomatic priority + tax payer’s views

(e.g. DPRK)

• How to strike a balance between HA principles and diplomacy (=pursue national interests)

Total ODA ranking

HA funding ?

US US 6.5%

UK UK 10.8%

France Japan 10.8%

Germany Sweden 54.1%

Japan Norway 48.8%

Spain Spain 10.8%

Canada Australia 8.2%

Norway Germany 18.1%

Sweden Netherlands 38%

Australia Switzerland 51.8%

OECD/DAC statistics 2010 (ODA and HA funding) UNOCHA financial tracking service (2010 for non-earmarking)

Thank you for your Attention!

Any question?