how successful were the five-year plans?

14
How successful were the Five-Year Plans? L/O – To evaluate the successes and failures of the Five-Year Plans

Upload: shaina

Post on 24-Feb-2016

37 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

How successful were the Five-Year Plans?. L/O – To evaluate the successes and failures of the Five-Year Plans. The First Five-Year Plan, 1928-32. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: How successful were the Five-Year Plans?

How successful were the Five-Year

Plans?L/O – To evaluate the successes and failures of

the Five-Year Plans

Page 2: How successful were the Five-Year Plans?

The First Five-Year Plan, 1928-32• Began on 1st October 1928. Concentrated

on heavy industry (80% of investment) – coal, steel, iron, oil, cement, metals, timber and machine production.

• Overall production was planned to increase by 300%! Electricity production was planned to increase by 600%!

• Many workers were excited by the vision of creating a socialist economy and worked hard to fulfil each year’s targets.

Page 3: How successful were the Five-Year Plans?

The First Five-Year Plan - Successes• Successes included: trebling

electricity production, doubling coal and iron production and steel by over one third.

• Engineering industry was developed and huge new industrial complex’s were built like the city of Magnitokorsk.

• Over 1500 enterprises were developed across the USSR however there were many failures.

Page 4: How successful were the Five-Year Plans?

The First Five-Year Plan - Failures• Many resources were diverted to heavy

industry, meaning that consumer industries like clothing suffered from a lack of development.

• Many targets were not met – mainly due to targets being too optimistic but there was a lack of skilled workers, competition for sparse resources, waste and transport issues.

• A lot of resources also had to be diverted to collectivisation – ‘bourgeois specialists’ were blamed and arrested.

Page 5: How successful were the Five-Year Plans?

The Second Five-Year Plan – 1933-37• The First Five-Year Plan had caused many

problems. The lack of planning meant that the railway system couldn’t cope with the increase in traffic.

• Forced collectivisation had also led to food shortages, rationing and even famine. Many workers changed jobs regularly and skilled workers were in short supply.

• The Second Five-Year Plan therefore tried to consolidate these problems. There was still a focus on heavy industry but targets were scaled back.

Page 6: How successful were the Five-Year Plans?

The Second Five-Year Plan – Successes• The Second Plan was helped by the fact that

huge projects started in the First Plan had come online – Magnitokorsk and the Dneiper Dam are two examples.

• By 1937 the USSR was self-sufficient in machine tool production. Heavy industry, chemicals and metallurgy also developed rapidly.

• New training schemes were also introduced and there was a bigger focus on transport and communications.

Page 7: How successful were the Five-Year Plans?

The Second Five-Year Plan – Failures• There was still a problem with the lack of

consumer goods – too many resources were being assigned to heavy industry. Oil production was also slow to increase.

• Similar problems of shortages, waste, bribery, corruption and over production were apparent.

• The Great Terror and Purges also meant that the economy was being deprived of valuable personnel – many were too scared to admit failure so mistakes were covered up.

Page 8: How successful were the Five-Year Plans?

The Third Five-Year Plan, 1938-41• Proposals to develop consumer goods and

light industry suffered due to the growing threat of war. The Third Plan therefore focused on heavy industry and armaments.

• The Plan also only lasted 3 ½ years due to the invasion of the USSR by Germany in 1941.

• Consumer growth remained slow and iron/steel stopped growing. There was even a fuel crisis in oil.

Page 9: How successful were the Five-Year Plans?

The Fourth Five-Year Plan, 1946-50• During World War Two, the USSR lost nearly

100,000 collective farms, 5 million homes and over 17 million cattle. Railways, roads and bridges were also destroyed. Retreating German armies stripped industrial equipment and farming produce from the USSR.

• After the war, Britain and the USA refused to take massive reparations from Germany, therefore the USSR had to use its own resources to rebuild – another Five-Year Plan was needed.

Page 10: How successful were the Five-Year Plans?

The Fourth Five-Year Plan, 1946-50• Emphasis was placed on re-building heavy

industry and on reviving agriculture. Collectivisation was still a priority.

• However there was a focus on civilian needs – new shops and homes were rebuilt. By 1946, 2.5 million people had been re-housed.

• By 1950, Stalin claimed that production levels were back to or higher than 1940 however agriculture was not completely collectivised.

Page 11: How successful were the Five-Year Plans?

The Fifth Five-Year Plan, 1951-55• This plan set lower targets than previous

plans. The growing Cold War had resulted in increasing amounts of money being diverted into the defence industry, especially into Nuclear Weapons.

• Rationing had ended in 1947, and real wages rose steadily from 1948; by 1952, they had surpassed the 1940 levels.

• By the time of Stalin’s death in March 1953, the USSR had developed into one of the world’s leading industrial powers.

Page 12: How successful were the Five-Year Plans?
Page 13: How successful were the Five-Year Plans?
Page 14: How successful were the Five-Year Plans?

Questions1. Use the notes from this presentation to complete the

table below.

2. What were the main successes of the Five-Year Plans?3. What were the main failures of the Five-Year Plans?

4. What evidence is there to suggest that the Five-Year Plans were NOT planned well?

Plan Aims of Plan Evidence of Success

Evidence of Failure

Evidence they were not well planned

First Five Year Plan 1928-32

Second…….