how brain science can improve our instructional approach to reading

49
How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading Miracanion.com

Upload: effie

Post on 24-Feb-2016

53 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading. Miracanion.com. About 200 years ago. There is no dedicated area of the brain for reading. That’s is why we teach kids how to read. As opposed to speaking: there is a center of the brain that handles speech . Kendall Haven. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

How Brain Science CanImprove Our Instructional

Approach to Reading

Miracanion.com

Page 2: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

About 200 years ago

• There is no dedicated area of the brain for reading.

• That’s is why we teach kids how to read.

• As opposed to speaking: there is a center of the brain that handles speech.

Kendall Haven

Page 3: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

100,000 to 300,000 years ago

• We have used storytelling to communicate and archive history, knowledge, values, ideas, abstract concepts, etc.

Kendall Haven

Page 4: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

For 300,000 years

• Human beings have relied on storytelling as the vehicle for archiving information because there was no other way.

• Because we have relied on that process for so many millennia, our brains have evolutionarily been rewired so that at birth you are born hardwired to think in very specific story terms.

Kendall Haven

Page 5: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

Humans are hardwired to think in story terms

• To understand• To make sense• To remember

Kendall Haven

Page 6: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

Neural Story Map

“The brain converts raw experience into story form and then considers, ponders, remembers, and acts on the self-created story, not the actual input experience.” Haven, p. 24 Storyproof

Page 7: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

Story terms

• Person #1: “Where’s John?”• Person #2: “Well…I didn’t want to say

anything. But…I saw a green VW parked in front of Carol’s.”

Kendall Haven

Page 8: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

• Did your partner say there is no connection?• Did anyone say that the two statements did not

make sense?

• Human minds assume a connection and assume it makes sense.

• We use story structures to fill in missing information.

Kendall Haven

Page 9: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

Minds in Action

• Person #1: “Hi, John.”• Person #2: “Shhhhh! I’m not here! You never

saw me. I’m not here!”• Person #1: “It’s okay. Carol’s gone home.”

Kendall Haven

Page 10: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

Story Mind

He went to the store.Fred died.

Sharon went hungry and wept.

Kendall Haven

Page 11: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

He went to the store. Fred died.

Sharon went hungry and wept.

What are your brain’s assumptions?

Kendall Haven

Page 12: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

You assume:

1. Connection and story structure.2. Missing information is ok.3. Its about characters.4. Character relationships.5. Cause and effect sequencing.6. Goal and motive.7. Struggle and obstacles.8. Emotional reactions and states.

Kendall Haven

Page 13: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

Rival by Mira Canion

"Well, well. What do we have here? A romanticscene no doubt" smirked Tarik in order to angerboth Clara and Jafar. "We are eating," said Clarawithout hesitation. "What might you two benibbling on?" laughed Tarik. "Arabic food,"responded Clara innocently as she peered at Tarik’s thin face.

Page 14: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

Carlos: Yes, I know about the map.Henry: Go on. Tell me.Carlos: What do I get in return?Click! Henry prepares his pistol.

Piratas del Caribe y el mapa secretoMira Canion

Page 15: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

Implications for reading instruction?

1. Connection and story structure.2. Missing information is ok.3. Its about characters.4. Character relationships.5. Cause and effect sequencing.6. Goal and motive.7. Struggle and obstacles.8. Emotional reactions and states.

Kendall Haven

Teach story structure.

Page 16: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

Wait! What is story?

Page 17: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

Are these stories?

• A magazine article?• An essay• A memo?

• A conversation?• A joke?

• A directive?

Kendall Haven

Page 18: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

What is story? or What makes a good story?

Page 19: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

He went to school.

Is that a story?

Page 20: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

He went to school.

Is that a story?

Page 21: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

What is the opposite of story?

?

Page 22: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

Non-story?

• “We equate FICTION with false, made up, lies, and ‘stories’. We equate REALITY with nonfiction, true, facts. But all events (facts) are subject to some interpretation that fictionalizes them…” Haven, p. 128 Storyproof

Page 23: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

Fluctuations and phase transitions in Larkin-Ovchinnikov liquid crystal states of population-imbalanced resonant Fermi gas

Leo Radzihovsky (Submitted on 24 Feb 2011)Motivated by a realization of imbalanced Feshbach-resonant atomic Fermi gases, we formulate a low-energy theory of the Fulde-Ferrell and the Larkin-Ovchinnikov (LO) states and use it to analyze fluctuations, stability, and phase transitions in these enigmatic finite momentum-paired superfluids. Focusing on the unidirectional LO pair-density wave state, that spontaneously breaks the continuous rotational and translational symmetries, we show that it is characterized by two Goldstone modes, corresponding to a superfluid phase and a smectic phonon. Because of the liquid-crystalline "softness" of the latter, at finite temperature the 3d state is characterized by a vanishing LO order parameter, quasi-Bragg peaks in the structure and momentum distribution functions, and a "charge"-4, paired Cooper-pairs, off-diagonal-long-range order, with a superfluid-stiffness anisotropy that diverges near a transition into a nonsuperfluid state. In addition to conventional integer vortices and dislocations the LO superfluid smectic exhibits composite half-integer vortex-dislocation defects. A proliferation of defects leads to a rich variety of descendant states, such as the "charge"-4 superfluid and Fermi-liquid nematics and topologically ordered nonsuperfluid states, that generically intervene between the LO state and the conventional superfluid and the polarized Fermi-liquid at low and high imbalance, respectively. The fermionic sector of the LO gapless superconductor is also quite unique, exhibiting a Fermi surface of Bogoliubov quasiparticles associated with the Andreev band of states, localized on the array of the LO domain-walls.

Page 24: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

What story really is…

• An interesting character is motived to achieve a goal. Along the way he faces risk and danger in the form of problems and conflicts.

Page 25: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

Story is how content is organized

Story is the most effective delivery vehicle for your content

Kendall Haven

Page 26: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

Summarizing the text(teaching story structure)

SomebodyWants

ButSo

MacOn et al. 1991

Page 27: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

Implications for reading instruction?

1. Connection and story structure.2. Missing information is ok.3. Its about characters.4. Character relationships.5. Cause and effect sequencing.6. Goal and motive.7. Struggle and obstacles.8. Emotional reactions and states.

Kendall Haven

• Character

Page 28: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

Character

• Character has a serious problem.

• Let’s look at a character and how to build background knowledge.

Page 29: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

Agree or disagree?

1. It’s better to ignore a problem than to confront it.2. People’s opinions of you are true.3. You are what people think of you.4. You can’t be someone else than who you are.5. You can’t change people’s opinions of you.

Page 30: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading
Page 31: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

Sara Gómez

“Vampire! Sara is a vampire!” exclaimed a group of kids. Sara had tolerated insults and cruel comments for many years. She always tried to defend herself because she was very stubborn. But now she was just tired of defending herself. What she really wanted was to be accepted and loved by everyone. Sometimes she just wanted to escape from her community rather than tolerate the negative comments. Unfortunately, the comments had become her identity. However, Sara had no idea that today the comments were going to be much worse.”

La Vampirata

Page 32: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

What are you assuming?“Vampire! Sara is a vampire!” exclaimed a group of kids. Sara had tolerated insults and cruel comments for many years. She always tried to defend herself because she was very stubborn. But now she was just tired of defending herself. What she really wanted was to be accepted and loved by everyone. Sometimes she just wanted to escape from her community rather than tolerate the negative comments. Unfortunately, the comments had become her identity. However, Sara had no idea that today the comments were going to be much worse.” La Vampirata

1. Connection and story structure.2. Missing information is ok.3. Its about characters.4. Character relationships.5. Cause and effect sequencing.6. Goal and motive.7. Struggle and obstacles.8. Emotional reactions and states.Kendall Haven

Page 33: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

In Sara’s shoes…

• 1741 Vampire-frenzied Rhode Island

• Story of Mercy Brown is the historical background for the character of Sara in La

Vampirata

Page 34: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading
Page 35: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

In Sara’s shoes…

• On the heels of Salem Witch Trials• What would this conflict look like today?• Would it be life threatening?

Page 36: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

Journaling

Chose one the categories and journal about it.1. Being labeled2. Excluded from a social group facebook, twitter, etc. 3. Believing other's opinions of you: theme of Shrek III (Arthur)4. Joining a group just to feel accepted or popular5. Acceptance/Respect6. Feeling loved/valued/respected7. Stories from the drama of middle school

Page 37: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

• What makes the characters interesting?

• Read the following selection…

Page 38: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

Secretly Sara observed her uncle and mother talking in the kitchen. She was mighty curious to hear them in action, given that her mother did not appreciate Lucas very much. Lucas López was an infamous pirate of the Caribbean, which my mother loathed. Sara couldn't stand him because he was not only egoistical, but also dishonest and had an aggressive personality. He was tall with long, black hair. It seemed like he was always planning his latest adventure in search of fame and fortune. "You have to hide an emerald for me," saidLucas. "Me? Hide an emerald? Why me?” responded Rebecca. La Vampirata

Page 39: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

Secretly Sara observed her uncle and mother talking in the kitchen. She was mighty curious to hear them in action, given that her mother did not appreciate Lucas very much. Lucas López was an infamous pirate of the Caribbean, which my mother loathed. Sara couldn't stand him because he was not only egoistical, but also dishonest and had an aggressive personality. He was tall with long, black hair. It seemed like he was always planning his latest adventure in search of fame and fortune. "You have to hide an emerald for me," saidLucas. "Me? Hide an emerald? Why me?” responded Rebecca. La Vampirata

Page 40: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

Character and motive

• What do you notice about Tomás?

• What are his motives?

Page 41: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

La Vampirata

Thomas had long hair, a big nose and very shiftyeyes. He seemed very dishonest due to the negative energy he exuded. Thomas asked them, "What do you want?""We want to go to the Jaguar Temple," responded Martha. "Why do you want to go there?" inquired Thomas.La Vampirata

Page 42: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

Chance to talk about character and motives

(not fluffy reading activities)

Page 43: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading
Page 44: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

Agentes secretos: 5th grade students draw main characters

Page 45: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

1. Connection and story structure.2. Missing information is ok.3. Its about characters.4. Character relationships.5. Cause and effect sequencing.6. Goal and motive.7. Struggle and obstacles.8. Emotional reactions and states.

Kendall Haven

Page 46: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

How can we help kids visualize?

Page 47: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

When students are unable to draw a narrative, it shows where comprehension breaks down.

Students check the text often to confirm details.

Student drawings for Tumba by Mira Canion

Page 48: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

Drawings

also a source for exams

Comic strips for Agentes secretos

Page 49: How Brain Science Can Improve Our Instructional Approach to Reading

From sentences to predictionTurn to partner- share your prediction

• Phrase:Paula y Luis visitan París, porque tienen un motivo secreto.

(Paula and Luis visit Paris because they have a secret motive.)

• My prediction/(Sentence frames)• Paula and Luis are going

to…• The secret motive is…