history & philosophy of calculus, session 1 ancient greek geometry

Click here to load reader

Upload: tamsyn-stewart

Post on 18-Jan-2018

232 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

 Euclid’s Elements deals only with straight lines and circles, and figures that can be made with them.  In a sense these are the simplest of the “curves”.  The next step up from these objects are the conics.  Historically, these were motivated by the Delian problem and other puzzles in which they arise quite naturally. STRAIGHT LINES & CIRCLES

TRANSCRIPT

History & Philosophy of Calculus, Session 1 ANCIENT GREEK GEOMETRY CONIC SECTIONS Euclids Elements deals only with straight lines and circles, and figures that can be made with them. In a sense these are the simplest of the curves. The next step up from these objects are the conics. Historically, these were motivated by the Delian problem and other puzzles in which they arise quite naturally. STRAIGHT LINES & CIRCLES What we now call conic sections were related to cones by Apollonius, at least a century after work on problems involving them began. CONICS Page from a C9th Arabic translation of Apolloniuss treatise on conics. ARCHIMEDES METHOD OF EXHAUSTION Quadrature is the art of comparing the areas of shapes. Which of these two shapes has the greater area? The word means squaring. The way you classically compare two shapes areas is by constructing for each a square that has the same area. Then the two squares can be compared directly. One ancient problem was the quadrature of the circle; this was never solved, and we now know it cant be solved by the methods used by the Greeks. QUADRATURE SQUARING THE CIRCLE The previous image suggests that the area of the circle is about half the circumference times the radius. The more slices we take, the less curved the outer edge of the slice is; the closer it is to being a triangle. So the more accurate this estimate will be. But the estimate is the same regardless of how many slices we take. So if we imagine taking an infinite number, we still get the same estimate. Does this agree with what you learned at school about areas of circles? C= 2r So our estimate says that A = x 2r x r = r 2 Notice that Archimedes doesnt need to tangle directly with the troublesome number here! SQUARING THE CIRCLE A parabola is a type of conic section. Once you start working with these more complicated curves, its natural to ask how much of our existing geometry transfers over to them. One natural question is whether we can find their areas. A parabola is an infinite curve but we can ask about the part cut off by an arbitrary line. SQUARING THE PARABOLA We want to find the areas of this region, bounded by the parabola (orange) and the straight line (black). Find the point on the parabola where the tangent is parallel to the cutting-off line. Form a triangle as shown, using that point at the third vertex. FIRST APPROXIMATION SECOND APPROXIMATION Notice that the second approximation uses exactly the same technique as the first, it just does it twice. We can repeat it as many times as we like. Each time we repeat it, well get a closer estimate to the area we want (though itll always be a little bit low). Archimedes already had a proof that the areas of the two green triangles added together is a quarter that of the pink triangle. So, the idea is to use this knowledge to ask what happens if we just keep on going, repeating the same procedure an infinite number of times. FROM FIRST TO SECOND STEP 1 gives a triangle of area A. This is easy to find. STEP 2 gives a triangle of area A plus two more that add up to A STEP 3 will give us A + A + (A), since the next set of four triangles will have a quarter of the area of the two triangles from STEP 2. STEP N will give us A + A + (A) + ((A))+ Notice that what we add each time is a LOT smaller than what we added last time. So we might not be surprised if this doesnt shoot off to infinity. And geometrically, we can see that the area will be constrained by the parabola; it cant expand to infinity. So the formula is: A + ()A + () 2 A + () 3 A + () 4 A This goes on forever. But does that make any sense? What value could it possibly have? ARCHIMEDES APPROXIMATIONS AN INFINITE SUM ARCHIMEDES FORMULA