historical methods of esl
TRANSCRIPT
Historical Methodologies
of teaching ESL
By Brett Richards
HUEN 643
The Natural ApproachHistorical Background:
Founded by Tracy Terrell who was a Spanish teacher and with the help of Stephen Krashen in the mid 1970’s early 1980’s
Emphasizes communication and does not focus on the grammar aspect
Stimulates child language acquisition
Emphasizes communication, comprehensible input, kinesthetic activities
A book in 1983 was published called “The Natural Approach.”
The Natural ApproachMethodology of its use:
Teacher only speaks the target language
Class time is used for input acquisition
Errors in speech are not corrected, however it involves lots of grammar exercises.
Its focus is learning and acquisition.
Reading and Listening comprehension for beginning students
Textbooks are not used and it is the teacher’s responsibility to make the classroom experience enjoyable and unchallenging.
Stephen Krashen
Schmidt, G. (2012).
http://www.substancenews.net/articles.php?page=3425. Retrieved
from http://www.slideshare.net/jlo161/community-
(n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/AjaanRobCMU/the-natual-
approach-teaching-methodology-presentation
Disadvantages of the Natural
Approach Method Limited in its interest and relevance to students
Focuses more on grammar and not speech
Method is considered somewhat outdated
Stephen Krashen on language acquisition. (2012, October). Retrieved from
http://adultesljobs.com/dr-stephen-krashen-on-language-acquisition/
The Grammar Translation Method
Historical Background:
Originated in the 1500’s from teaching Latin. Popular in the 18th
and 19th century
Started by Roger Ascham and John Locke
Has 2 main purposes. The first is to help students read and understand in the language they are learning. Second, is to develop the students overall mental discipline.
Classes are usually conducted in the students native language
This method is hardly ever used anymore and is considered more so ‘outdated’
Roger Ascham
(n.d.). Retrieved from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Ascham
John Locke
(n.d.). Retrieved from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Locke
Grammar Translation Method
Advantages Translation is the easiest and shortest way of
explaining meaning of words and phrases.
Learners have no difficulties to understand the lesson
as it is carried out in the mother tongue.
It is a labor-saving method as the teacher carries out
everything in the native tongue.
Facilitated the teacher who teach usually straight from
the textbooks
Grammar Translation Method
Disadvantages The method is good at “teaching about the language”,
however it is not good at “teaching the language”.
Speaking or any kind of spontaneous creative output was missing from the curriculum.
Students lack an active role in the classroom.
Very little attention is paid to communication.
Very little attention is paid to content.
Lots of memorization, students do not learn reading comprehension skills.
Translation is sometimes misleading and confusing
Grammar Translation Method
Structure
(n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?pid=S0256-
95742009000700016&script=sci_arttext
The Total Physical Response
(TPR) MethodHistorical Background:
Method was developed by Dr. James Asher
Studied this program in response as to the high drop-out rate of people learning a second language, but yet the majority don’t have problems learning their first language
The human brain has a biological program for acquiring any natural language including sign language for deaf people.
A method of teaching language using physical activity/input
Found that “stress” is a factor in learning a second language. Less stress=more learning
Grammar study is less effective than simple exposure.
Dr. James Asher
(n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.tpr-world.com
Total Physical Response
Method Involves doing drills which the teacher commands
Students respond by doing the physical actions with
what they hear
Language-body conversation. For example: “Look at
daddy!” (and the child looks towards her dad)
Dr. James Asher has his own website that he updates
that can be found at www.tpr-world.com
Dr. James Ashers Steps The Bio-program
Brain Lateralization
Reduction of Stress
*** These 3 elements were deemed necessary in order to
successfully learn a second language almost identical to
learning your first language.
Advantages Successful with children and adults learning any
language.
Understanding of any target language with Long-term
retention and without stress
Enjoyable for teachers as well as students
The Audio-Lingual MethodHistorical Background:
Founded in the 1950’s-1960’s
Charles Fries was the founder (1887-1967)
Uses a system of “reinforcement” drills and repetitions to acquire a language
Based on positive/negative method. Eg: If something was taught positively, it would usually produce positive answers. If something was taught negatively, there would usually be a negative answer which was equivalent to forming “habits” (Psychological aspect)
The Audio-Lingual Method came from the “Direct Method”
Focus is more direct towards grammar
Charles Fries
(n.d.). Retrieved from
http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/al/research/collect/elt_arc
hive/halloffame/fries/
The Audio-Lingual MethodPsychological aspects of the Audio-Lingual Method:
Language learning is developed by habits
Bad habits need to be eliminated immediately whilst
good habits in the language learning need to be
reinforced and continued
Language is learnt in audio form (orally) then after in its
written form
Lots of memorization involved like the Grammar
Translation Method
Established due to the flaws in the “Direct Method”
The Direct Method Does not use the learners native language but more so the
target language
Also referred to sometimes as the “Natural Method”
Established in Europe in the 1900’s
Class activities and conversation is centered around the
target language using the Direct Method
Called the “direct method” because it is directed at the target
language without translations of the native language
The Direct Method Gives learners ‘useful and meaningful knowledge’
enabling them to speak the language
Relies on language being taught without translation.
This is the opposite to the “Grammar-Translation”
method.
A further belief is that the language can be taught better
if it is actively used continually in a classroom setting by
the teacher who uses demonstrations and hand
gestures and voice tone (similar to that of the “Berlitz
Method”).
Eliminates teacher-student workbook exercises
Advantages of the Direct
Method Helps students become actively involved in the
language
Avoids the textbook
Gives the students the opportunity to interact with other students in the classroom speaking the language
Basic vocabulary is given first to help the students adapt to the language
More oral activities instead of written
Disadvantages of the Direct
Method Some students will not understand everything that is
demonstrated
Teacher does not use textbooks at all where some
students can grasp basic understandings through
written content
Students can become shy of speaking the language in
an immersion type situation
If not taught properly, bad grammatical habits can start
Only effective if taught by the actual native speaker
The Silent Way
Historical Background:
Founded by Egyptian educator Caleb Gattegno (1911–
1988)
The Silent Way found its way into classrooms following
the publication of Gattegno’s text, also called “The
Silent Way”
Its theory is that the student has to be actively engaged
in learning the language on a personal level
Caleb Gattegno
(n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.apprenez-
autrement.fr/gb/pedagogy.html
The Silent Way The objective is to make learning automatic by
encouraging students to discover, rather than
memorize.
This is achieved by teaching students to associate
physical objects specifically, color-coded rods which
represented a phoneme of the language.
Pronunciation is a key element in learning the target
language.
Repetition and translation are not considered ‘effective’.
The Silent Way Teacher acts as a facilitator and remains ‘silent’ hence,
the name of the method.
Hand gestures, demonstrations and voice tone is used
by the teacher to help the students. This is also used in
the Berlitz Method and the Direct Method.
Uses Cuisenaire Rods (color association) to assist in
the learning process.
Teacher uses prior knowledge of students to help
Students problem-solve the situation
SuggestopediaHistorical Background:
Developed by Georgi Lozanov in 1979
When the mind and body are relaxed, the brain absorbs knowledge without effort.
Can teach a language up to three times faster.
Surrounding environment plays a big role in how a student will learn. Uses songs, games etc,etc to assist in the learning process.
A students ‘belief’ of the method that it works depends on if they will learn the language or not (psychological).
Method involves psychological factors in learning a language.
Georgi Lozanov
(n.d.). Retrieved from http://phoenixclusive.wordpress.com/feature-
stories/suggestopedia-a-revolutionary-learning-method-or-a-fraud/
Suggestopedia Based on “Suggestology” or in other words, eliminating
negative factors from a learners life to be able to learn effectively (psychological aspect)
The learning environment is essential for a student to feel comfortable to learn (psychological)
Teacher should be an active participant with the students, which is the opposite to other methods such as the “Community Language Learning” method and the “Silent Way” method
Other methods such as Superlearning, Suggestive Accelerated Learning and Teaching (SALT), and Psychopädie came about due to Suggestopedia.
Community Language
LearningHistorical Background:
Founded by Jesuit Priest, Charles Curran
In groups, students decide what areas of language they want to learn
Teacher=The Counselor/Student= The Client
The teacher assists the needs of the student
Psychological aspect as counselor and client
Now spread to online social media and forums for language learning
Charles Curran
Gilbert, K. (2010, October 27). Dalls bishop condemns pro-abortion priest lecture.
Retrieved from http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/archive//ldn/2010/oct/10102708
Community Language
Learning Method Linguistic and behavioral skills are involved
Learners personal experiences contribute to the
learning atmosphere
Involves the person completely and uses their feelings,
emotion and knowledge to be able to learn a language
Advantages to the Community
Language Learning Method
The counselor lets the students determine the
conversation
Helps the student make trial-error improvements
Allows in groups to support each other
Disadvantages to the Community
Language Learning Method
The teacher can be too non-functional with the students.
Students might develop bad linguistic habits within the group.
The translation by the teacher might not be sufficiently correct.
Not enough interest in the area of Community Language Learning from many teachers.
Considered a difficult method by teachers due to letting the students take control of the situation which could be disastrous.
Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/jlo161/community-language-
learning
Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/jlo161/community-language-learning
The Berlitz Method
Historical Background:
Founded by Maximilian Berlitz (1852-1921)
Immigrated to the U.S. and was a French and German teacher
Was teaching, became ill and hired Nicholas Joy who taught the
class, upon Berlitz's return, the class spoke semi-fluent French
due to Nicholas Joy using hand gestures, facial expressions, tone
of voice and pointing to objects.
Berlitz noticed it was effective and built upon this newly discovered
method and called it the “Berlitz Method” which involves only
speaking the target language, or in other words, complete
immersion in the language.
Maximilian Berlitz
n.d.). Retrieved from
http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/al/research/collect/elt_archive/halloffame/ber
litz/
The Berlitz Method
Achievements and where it stands today:
Began opening up language institutions all over the United States
Taught the German Kaiser English
Received many distinguished awards from around the world
Actively taught until his death at 68 years old
Berlitz is now an international tradesmark that has schools all over
the world. Their official website is http://www.berlitz.com
The Communicative ApproachHistorical Background:
Popular in the 1970’s and 1980’s
Many different linguist professionals in the U.K. and the U.S. such as Henry Widdowson and Dell Hymes (deceased) attributed to the method
Had a high demand throughout Europe due to migration and business purposes
Languages began to be taught in all schools and not just private institutions therefore, curriculums were changed in schools and implemented all through Europe
Lessons are topic or theme based, engages learners and not grammatical based or repetitive
Henry Widdowson
(n.d.). Retrieved from http://nnesintesol.blogspot.com/2009/01/henry-g-
widdowson.html
Dell Hymes (1927-2009)
(n.d.). Retrieved from http://culturizatemundo.blogspot.com
The Communicative Approach Language is used when it has real meaning or in other
words, ‘using’ the language in real communicationsituations. More hands on approach
Came about due to dissatisfaction of the ‘audio-lingual’ and ‘grammar translation’ methods
Encourages students to learn more about the culture of thelanguage being learnt and to have more direct interaction(if possible) of those that speak that particular language
Interaction is within pairs or groups to encourage the flow of conversation.
Advantages of the
Communicative Approach Works well with students at lower levels of English
Creates a good environment of trust between the
teacher and the student
Teacher (counselor) is more so a “guide” and lets the
students direct the conversation and class to where it
wants to go to let the students (clients) feel comfortable
Students become more confident and independant
Disadvantages of the
Communicative Approach
Teacher has to know the target language and the
native language in order to effectively teach
Translation can become tedious especially if the
teacher does not translate the language correctly
Involves a lot of planning
If the teacher (counselor) does not guide the student
well, the student (client) can become discouraged due
to confusion and misunderstandings
Bibliographyhttp://www.tpr-world.com
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_method_(education)
http://www.apprenez-autrement.fr/gb/pedagogy.html
http://phoenixclusive.wordpress.com/feature-
stories/suggestopedia-a-revolutionary-learning-method-
or-a-fraud/
http://www.berlitz.com
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communicative_language_tea
ching
Bibliographyhttp://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/articles/community-
language-learning
http://myenglishpages.com/blog/community-language-
learning/
http://teflpedia.com/Direct_Method
http://nnesintesol.blogspot.com/2009/01/henry-g-
widdowson.html
http://www.onestopenglish.com/support/methodology/teac
hing-approaches/teaching-approaches-what-is-
suggestopedia/146499.article
Bibliographyhttp://mrs-siehs-esl-
wiki.wikispaces.com/Krashen+and+The+Natural+Approach
http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/archive//ldn/2010/oct/10102708
http://www.mjal.org/Journal/Community.pdf
http://culturizatemundo.blogspot.com
http://www2.vobs.at/ludescher/Alternative%20methods/communicativ
e_language_teaching.htm
http://www.slideshare.net/AjaanRobCMU/the-natual-approach-
teaching-methodology-presentation
http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?pid=S0256-
95742009000700016&script=sci_arttext
Bibliographyhttp://www.onestopenglish.com/support/methodology/teaching-
approaches/teaching-approaches-what-is-the-silent-
way/146498.article
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berlitz_Corporation#Maximilian_D._
Berlitz
http://www.jwelford.demon.co.uk/brainwaremap/suggest.html
http://blog.about-esl.com/audio-lingual-method-teaching-
english/
http://www-
01.sil.org/lingualinks/languagelearning/waystoapproachlanguag
elearning/TheAudioLingualMethod.htm
The End
“Tell me and I forget, teach me and I will remember,
involve me and I will always learn.”-Anonymous