historic bridges .org · trell, for he received no other patent, he applied for a patent and no....

16

Upload: others

Post on 15-Oct-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Historic Bridges .org · trell, for he received no other patent, he applied for a patent and no. 76,212 on March 31, 1868 (see fig- ure 3). It was more practical than Cottell's second
Page 2: Historic Bridges .org · trell, for he received no other patent, he applied for a patent and no. 76,212 on March 31, 1868 (see fig- ure 3). It was more practical than Cottell's second
Page 3: Historic Bridges .org · trell, for he received no other patent, he applied for a patent and no. 76,212 on March 31, 1868 (see fig- ure 3). It was more practical than Cottell's second
Page 4: Historic Bridges .org · trell, for he received no other patent, he applied for a patent and no. 76,212 on March 31, 1868 (see fig- ure 3). It was more practical than Cottell's second
Page 5: Historic Bridges .org · trell, for he received no other patent, he applied for a patent and no. 76,212 on March 31, 1868 (see fig- ure 3). It was more practical than Cottell's second
Page 6: Historic Bridges .org · trell, for he received no other patent, he applied for a patent and no. 76,212 on March 31, 1868 (see fig- ure 3). It was more practical than Cottell's second
Page 7: Historic Bridges .org · trell, for he received no other patent, he applied for a patent and no. 76,212 on March 31, 1868 (see fig- ure 3). It was more practical than Cottell's second
Page 8: Historic Bridges .org · trell, for he received no other patent, he applied for a patent and no. 76,212 on March 31, 1868 (see fig- ure 3). It was more practical than Cottell's second
Page 9: Historic Bridges .org · trell, for he received no other patent, he applied for a patent and no. 76,212 on March 31, 1868 (see fig- ure 3). It was more practical than Cottell's second
Page 10: Historic Bridges .org · trell, for he received no other patent, he applied for a patent and no. 76,212 on March 31, 1868 (see fig- ure 3). It was more practical than Cottell's second
Page 11: Historic Bridges .org · trell, for he received no other patent, he applied for a patent and no. 76,212 on March 31, 1868 (see fig- ure 3). It was more practical than Cottell's second
Page 12: Historic Bridges .org · trell, for he received no other patent, he applied for a patent and no. 76,212 on March 31, 1868 (see fig- ure 3). It was more practical than Cottell's second
Page 13: Historic Bridges .org · trell, for he received no other patent, he applied for a patent and no. 76,212 on March 31, 1868 (see fig- ure 3). It was more practical than Cottell's second
Page 14: Historic Bridges .org · trell, for he received no other patent, he applied for a patent and no. 76,212 on March 31, 1868 (see fig- ure 3). It was more practical than Cottell's second
Page 15: Historic Bridges .org · trell, for he received no other patent, he applied for a patent and no. 76,212 on March 31, 1868 (see fig- ure 3). It was more practical than Cottell's second
Page 16: Historic Bridges .org · trell, for he received no other patent, he applied for a patent and no. 76,212 on March 31, 1868 (see fig- ure 3). It was more practical than Cottell's second