high blood pressure 8

3
high blood pressure 8 For additional 20 years, noninvasive blood pressure levels (NIBP) monitors have been popular in operating rooms and critical care units to closely monitor blood pressure in patients of any age. Despite the widespread usage of automated blood pressure levels monitors, clinicians still deliberate on the accuracy and longevity of automated NIBP devices compared to other ways of hypertension determination. The next techniques to commonly asked questions about the usage of NIBP monitoring are derived from clinical research. Q: How do hypertension measurements obtained with automatic noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) devices compare to direct arterial measurement of hypertension? Clinical research studies have demonstrated that anytime blood pressures systolic and diastolic, and mean arterial) determined by NIBP monitors from various manufacturers are when compared with direct arterial pressures, both values are, typically, within 5 mm Hg for each other. (1-9) Factors including the anatomical location of measurement give rise to the differences which one can find between direct and indirect methods. In comparing brachial arterial pressure obtained through the NIBP monitor to radial arterial pressure obtained by direct arterial cannulation, radial arterial pressure is commonly higher for the reason that radial artery is actually a smaller high blood pressure symptoms vessel and helps to create greater resistance to flow, which often results in a higher blood pressure level reading than that determined through the brachial artery by way of example.

Upload: quarrelsomefact21

Post on 25-Nov-2015

11 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

For additional 20 years, noninvasive blood pressure levels (NIBP) monitors have been popular in oper

TRANSCRIPT

  • high blood pressure 8

    For additional 20 years, noninvasive blood pressure levels (NIBP) monitors have been popular inoperating rooms and critical care units to closely monitor blood pressure in patients of any age.Despite the widespread usage of automated blood pressure levels monitors, clinicians still deliberateon the accuracy and longevity of automated NIBP devices compared to other ways of hypertensiondetermination. The next techniques to commonly asked questions about the usage of NIBPmonitoring are derived from clinical research.

    Q: How do hypertension measurements obtained with automatic noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP)devices compare to direct arterial measurement of hypertension?

    Clinical researchstudies havedemonstratedthat anytimeblood pressuressystolic anddiastolic, andmean arterial)determined byNIBP monitorsfrom variousmanufacturersare whencompared withdirect arterialpressures, bothvalues are,typically, within 5mm Hg for eachother. (1-9)Factors includingthe anatomicallocation ofmeasurementgive rise to thedifferences whichone can findbetween direct and indirect methods. In comparing brachial arterial pressure obtained through theNIBP monitor to radial arterial pressure obtained by direct arterial cannulation, radial arterialpressure is commonly higher for the reason that radial artery is actually a smaller high bloodpressure symptoms vessel and helps to create greater resistance to flow, which often results in ahigher blood pressure level reading than that determined through the brachial artery by way ofexample.

  • These studies also indicate that occasionally, somebody NIBP blood pressure level determinationvalue may vary as much as 37 mm Hg in the direct arterial value. (1-9) This large discrepancysignifies that treatment should not be made based on a single NIBP determination withoutcomparison to an auscultatory hypertension determination or several consecutive measurementsdone by an NIBP monitor.

    Q: Will it be vital that you make use of the correct cuff size when using automatic NIBP devices?

    Yes. By using a cuff that may be 1oo small will cause falsely http://www.bloodpressureuk.org/ highreadings, and taking advantage of a cuff which is too big will bring about falsely low readings. Thecuff width selected should equal 40% of your arm circumference (see Figure). The American HeartAssociation recommendations for appropriate cuff sizes depending on upper-arm circumferenceought to be followed when working with NIBP monitors (see Table). (10)

    Q: Are there any patient-related complications associated with using NIBP devices?

    Skin and tissue compression from NIBP monitors, which can cause skin irritation and bruising, arethe mostly occurring complications. Prolonged use and frequent blood pressure determinations canbring about venous pooling and congestion. Excessive venous pressures can cause tissue ischemiaand nerve damage. (11,12)

  • Q: What factors can interfere with obtaining accurate NIBP measurements?

    Several circumstances can prevent accurate determination of blood pressure levels with NIBPdevices. Highly irregular or rapid cardiac rhythms make it difficult to accurately determine bloodpressure levels using NIBP devices because of the great beat to beat variability. Most NIBP devicesemploy oscillometric technology that is influenced by fairly regular cardiac rhythms to find out bloodpressure level. Excessive patient movement including shivering, restlessness, or external movementlike that from a helicopter, ambulance transport, or perhaps a rapid-cycling ventilator can affectdetection of cardiac oscillations through the NIBP monitor. This can lead to erroneous bloodpressure levels measurements.