hep evaluation: measurement of strategy implementation
DESCRIPTION
HEP Evaluation: Measurement of Strategy Implementation. Office of Migrant Education United States Department of Education HEP Technical Assistance Webinar 28 September 2011. Purpose of the Webinar. We have variation in our results. Purpose of the Webinar. 2010 Target = MET! - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
HEP Evaluation: Measurement of
Strategy Implementation
Office of Migrant EducationUnited States Department of Education
HEP Technical Assistance Webinar 28 September 2011
2
Purpose of the Webinar
1 12
1
45
7
4
9
6
0
2
4
6
8
10
No.
of G
rant
ees =
40
Stratified GPRA 1 Chart: 2010 APR HEP Data We have variation
in our results.
3
Purpose of the Webinar 2010 Target = MET!
National Target = 69% of students attain a GED 2009-2010 National results = 70% Performance results reflect an increase of 9%. Performance results excluded first year (2009) projects.
Share Practices from Improving or High Performing Projects
IMPROVE HEP results nationwide, so that we may effectively and efficiently assist Migrant students obtain their GED’s and place them on the path toward success.
4
Today’s Objectives Review the meaning of program evaluation. Review the components of program
evaluation. Individual HEP project directors present
effective ways to measure strategy implementation.
Questions and answers for our presenters. Leave our webinar with ideas to improve
measurement of strategy implementation!
5
The Meaning of Program Evaluation
Evaluation means systematically and methodically collecting information about a program in order to improve the program or make decisions about the merit or worth of the program.
6
Components of Program Evaluation
1. To Determine Overall Effectiveness in Meeting Program Goals/Objectives (Are we on track?)
2. To Determine the Level Program Activities Are Being Implemented (Did we really deliver what we agreed to deliver in the application? How do we know?)
3. To Identify Strengths and Weaknesses in Program Implementation and Program Effectiveness (What strategies are working, and which ones are not?)
4. To Provide Recommendations for Change in Program, in Order to Improve Results (What can we do differently to change the results?)
7
Components of Program Evaluation
To Determine Overall Effectiveness in Meeting Program Goals/Objectives
Are program activities effective, leading to the achievement of strong GPRA 1 and GPRA 2 results and reaching these targets?
What evidence is available that supports the conclusions?
Are program activities cost efficient?
8
Components of Program Evaluation
To Determine the Level Program Activities Are Being Implemented (Prerequisite to ALL Evaluation Practices)
“With a level of quality, and all of the time!” “With a level of quality, most of the time ” “With a level of quality, some of the time …” “We really didn’t have the time ”
9
Components of Program Evaluation
Why study level of implementation? It can help answer the questions:
1. Did our project fulfill its responsibilities in our application?
2. Did our project’s strategies make a difference in meeting our GPRA targets?
10
Components of Program Evaluation
To Identify Strengths and Weaknesses in Program Implementation and Program Effectiveness Through customer satisfaction surveys (plus and delta, all
services) Through observations (e.g., tutoring, instruction, placement) Through documentation (e.g., logs of recruitment, counseling,
tutoring) Through exit interviews Through research, by finding correlations between practices
and results (using student level data, discovering relationships between practices and achievement)
11
Program Evaluation’s Purpose
To Provide Recommendations for Change in Program, in Order to Improve Results. Examples: Tutoring targeted to specific skills
(teachers/mentors/students) Mentors with regular and structured meetings, specific
supports Individualized Education Plans with specific learning
objectives and learning plans Structured recruiting plan
12
Measurement of Strategy Implementation
HEP Directors Present Ideas… Antonia Luna, Texas State Technical College at
Harlingen Adan Suarez, Columbia Basin College Michelle Kelly, Boise State University Karla Peterkoski, Michigan State University Santos Manrique, Fort Scott Community College
13
Measurement of Strategy Implementation
Questions for the presenters, from the audience…
14
Summary
Good evaluation will tell you:
If program activities are delivering results. If program activities are being highly implemented. Program strengths and weaknesses. Suggestions for program improvement.
15
Program Evaluation
THANK YOU!In order for OME to better serve your needs, please provide an evaluation of today’s webinar! Ed will send the link…
Also, if you’d like to discuss your program’s evaluation process…
202.260.2823