health reform 2.0

34
29 East Madison, Suite 602 Chicago, Il 60602 312-782-6006 www.pnhp.org Health Reform 2.0 PNHP National Meeting May 22, 2010

Upload: duman

Post on 26-Feb-2016

41 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Health Reform 2.0. PNHP National Meeting May 22, 2010. 29 East Madison, Suite 602 Chicago, Il 60602 312-782-6006 www.pnhp.org. Uninsured in Massachusetts. Dukakis Bill. Medicaid Expansion. Reform. Percent uninsured. 1987. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Health Reform 2.0

29 East Madison, Suite 602Chicago, Il 60602312-782-6006www.pnhp.org

Health Reform 2.0PNHP National Meeting

May 22, 2010

Page 2: Health Reform 2.0

Uninsured in Massachusetts

Source: Census Bureau. Figures prior to 1999 adjusted for changes in CPS survey methods

20%

15%

10%

5%

0%1990 1995 2000 20051987

Dukakis Bill

Medicaid Expansio

nReform

Perc

ent u

nins

ured

Page 3: Health Reform 2.0

47 Million Americans Without Insurance Today

45

40

35

30

25

20

Source: Himmelstein, Woolhandler, Carrasquilo – Tabulation from CPS and NHIS data

Milli

ons o

f Uni

nsur

ed A

mer

icans

1980 1985 1990 1995 20001976 2008

Page 4: Health Reform 2.0

Uninsured Children HaveHigher Inpatient Mortality

Insured Uninsured0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.46

0.740000000000

001

Source: Jnl of Public Health, October 29, 2009

*Adjusted for gender, race, age, location, hospital type, and admission source

Adju

sted

* mor

talit

y ra

te (%

)

Page 5: Health Reform 2.0

Impact of Health Reform On the Uninsured

• 46 million today; ~23 million in 2019

Less uninsured Americans

• Medicare funding cut by $36 billion through 2019

Less funding for safety net hospitals

• Increased by $1 billion annually

Community health center funding enhanced

Page 6: Health Reform 2.0

Uninsured and Underinsured Delay Care for Heart Attacks

Insured Under-Insured Uninsured**0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.00

1.21

1.38

*Adjusted for age, sex, race, clinical, health status, social/psych factors, urban/rural ** Under-insured = had coverage but patient concerned about cost

Odds

ratio

for d

elay

ed c

are*

Source: JAMA April 15, 2010:303:1392

Page 7: Health Reform 2.0

Increasing Medicare HMO Copayments Drives People Into the

Hospital

Differences between plans that did and did not raise copayments

Source: NEJM 2010 362:320

Less outpatient visits• 198 less visits per 1,000 enrolleesMore admissions to the hospital• 22 more admissions per 1,000

enrolleesMore days in the hospital • 134 more days per 1,000 enrollees

Page 8: Health Reform 2.0

Expenses Are Rising for the Privately Insured

All Households Had Hospital Stay0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

3.1%

7.6%

4.7%

11.3%19992006

Source: Bernstein D. Office of Economic Policy, US Treasury

Full-year, privately-insured households with out-of-pocket expenses >$5,000 (2006 dollars)

Page 9: Health Reform 2.0

Impact of Health Reform On the Underinsured

If you like your current coverage, you can keep it

If you don’t like your current job-based coverage, you have to keep it

Policies will be required to cover at least 60% of expected health costs• e.g. $2,000 deductible + 20% co-

insurance for next $15,000 of care

Page 10: Health Reform 2.0

Is This Affordable Care?

• $5,000 annual premium• $2,000 deductible• 20% coinsurance for the next $15,000

Massachusetts policies available through the exchange to a 56 year-old with income > $32,000

Page 11: Health Reform 2.0

Crimes and Punishments In Massachusetts

The Crime The FineViolation of Child Labor Laws $50Employers Failing to Partially Subsidize a Poor Health Plan for Workers $295

Illegal Sale of Firearms, First Offense $500 max.Driving Under the Influence, First Offense $500 min.Domestic Assault $1000 max.Cruelty to or Malicious Killing of Animals $1000 max.Communication of a Terrorist Threat $1000 min.Being Uninsured In Massachusetts ~ $1000

Page 12: Health Reform 2.0

Most of the Medically BankruptHad Insurance Coverage

Private60%

VA/Military2%

Medicare10%

Medicaid5%

Uninsured22%

Source: Himmelstein et al. Am J Med, Aug. 2009

Insurance at onset of

illness

Page 13: Health Reform 2.0

Health Reform Will Have Little Impact on Medical Bankruptcy

Subgroup of Medical Bankruptcy Filers

Proportion In

Subgroup

Impact On Bankruptc

y Rates

Medically bankrupt who were uninsured in 2007 but will gain coverage

under reform.25% Up to a

50% drop

Insured 75% No change

Maximum impacton medical

bankruptcy rates

12.5% reductio

n

Page 14: Health Reform 2.0

Administrators Are Growing Faster Than Physicians

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics; NCHS; Himmelstein/Woolhandler analysis of CPS

3,000%

2,000%

1,000%

01970 1980 1990 2000 2009

Physicians

Administrators

Page 15: Health Reform 2.0

HMO Overhead, 2009

Aetna Humana WellPoint United HC Cigna0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

14.8%17.2% 17.4% 17.7% 18.8%

Source: SEC filings to shareholders. Calculated as (100 – Medical Loss Ratio)

Page 16: Health Reform 2.0

HMO CEO’s Pay, 2009Executive Firm Pay

Steve Hemsley United $102.0 Million*

Ronald Williams Aetna $24.3 Million

Edward Hanaway** Cigna $18.8 Million

Angela Braly WellPoint $9.8 Million

Michael McCallister Humana $6.5 Million

Dale Wolf Coventry $9.0 Million

Source: AFL/CIO CEO Pay Database & StarTribune 4/15/2010 * Includes exercised stock options** Retired with $73 million bonus

Page 17: Health Reform 2.0

Report: Health Insurers Shifting Costs Ahead of Law

Source: Susan Heavey, Washington (Reuters) April 15, 2010 5:27 PM EDT

“Some of the largest US health insurers are changing their accounting practices to book administration costs as medical costs in an attempt to circumvent new industry reforms, according to a US Senate panel’s report.”

Page 18: Health Reform 2.0

Private Medicare Advantage Plans’ High Overhead

Traditional Medicare Medicare Advantage$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$147

$1,450

Source: US House Committee on Energy and Commerce, December 2009

Over

head

per

enr

olle

e,

2008

Page 19: Health Reform 2.0

Medicare Advantage Plans

Medicare HMOs: High Overhead and Profits

Admin9.2%

Profit5.1%

Medical Care

85.7%

Traditional Medicare

Admin3.6%

Medical Care96.4%

Sources: GAO 6/24/2008 and National Health Account Data for 2005

Page 20: Health Reform 2.0

Despite high overhead, HMOs prosper by cherry-picking

Especially in Medicare, where cherry-picking is already illegal

Page 21: Health Reform 2.0

A Few Sick People Drive Most Costs

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100%

25%

50%

75%

0.0% 0.1% 0.6% 1.2% 2.0% 3.4% 5.4% 9.1%16.5%

61.8%

Decile of privately insured

Percentage of total health spending in 2001

Source: MEPS data, from Thorpe and Reinhart

Page 22: Health Reform 2.0

A Few Sick People Drive Most Costs

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 100%

25%

50%

75%

0.0% 0.1% 0.6% 1.2% 2.0% 3.4% 5.4% 9.1%16.5%

61.8%

Decile of privately insured

Percentage of total health spending in 2001

Source: MEPS data, from Thorpe and Reinhart

Top two deciles account for 78.3% of spending

Page 23: Health Reform 2.0

Medicare HMOs:The Healthy Go In, The Sick Go Out

12 month period before joining HMO

3 month period after leaving HMO

50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200%

66%

180%

Inpatient costs relative to FFS Medicare

Source: NEJM 1997; 337:169

Page 24: Health Reform 2.0

Impact of Health ReformOn Administrative Costs

IRS cost to enforce mandate: $5 – 10 billion

Running insurance exchanges: ~4% of premiums (based on MA plan)

Insurance overhead: ~13% of new premium revenues = $42 billion

Cap on insurance overhead: ????

Standardized claim forms: ????

Page 25: Health Reform 2.0

US Public Spending Is More Than the Total Spending in Other Nations

USCanadaFrance

GermanySweden

UKJapan

$0 $2,500 $5,000 $7,500 $10,000 $12,5004062 6710

$3,680 $3,450 $3,370 $3,200

$2,760 $2,470

Total Spending US Public US Private

Note: “US Public” includes benefit costs for government employees and tax subsidies for private insurance

Sources: OECD 2008; Health Affairs 2002;21(4)88 – Data are for 2006

Page 26: Health Reform 2.0

The Lancet Cover: Dec. 5, 2009

“The health-care reform process exposes how corporate influence renders the US Government incapable of making policy on the basis of evidence and the public interest.”

Page 27: Health Reform 2.0

Role Played by Health Industry In Health Reform

Insurance donations to both Democrats & Republicans Insurance company ads both favoring and opposing reformPharma spent over $100 million on ads supporting reformSenate framework written by Liz Fowler, former VP of Public Policy for WellPoint/Anthem

Page 28: Health Reform 2.0

Cost of Health Reform Expansions in Coverage

Expanded Medicaid $434 billion

Subsidies for

private coverage $358 billion

Small employer tax credits

$37 billion

Temporary high risk

pools, subsidy

for retirees

<65, etc ~$10 billion

All figures reflect spending through 2019

Page 29: Health Reform 2.0

Sources of Health Reform SavingsDecrease

d Medicare Advantag

e/HMO overpaym

ent: $136 billion

Decreased

Medicare (DSH)

payment to safety

net hospitals: $36

billion

Decreased

Medicare fee-for-service

payments to doctors

and hospitals: $196 billion

Other Medicare

and Medicaid

cuts: $87

billion

All figures reflect spending through 2019

Page 30: Health Reform 2.0

Impact of Health Reform On Cost Control Provisions• Insurance

Exchanges• Fraud and

Abuse prosecution/recovery

• Medicare Advisory Board

• Tax on “Cadillac” coverage

• Coverage of preventive

services

• Health Information Technology

• Comparative Effectiveness

Research

• Alternatives to Fee for Service

• Malpractice reform

Insurance

ChangesBenefit

Changes

System Changes

Experiments in

Change

Page 31: Health Reform 2.0

Healthcare Reform’sProven Cost Control Provisions

NothingProven

NothingProven

Nothing Proven

NothingProven

Page 32: Health Reform 2.0

Robust Data About Hospital Computing and the Cost and

Quality of Care

Data source

s

Computeriza

tionHIMSS

surveys 2003–2007

Quality

Medicare /

Dartmouth Atlas

Costs Medicare

cost reports

Data available for ~4,000 U.S. hospitals

Page 33: Health Reform 2.0

Computer Myths and Evidence

Lower cost of care

• No association with computerization

Lower administrative costs

• No association with computerization

Slightly better quality scores

• Real improvement or just more documentation?

Page 34: Health Reform 2.0

Texas’ 2003 Tort Reform Failed to Curb Medical Costs

$10,000

$5,000

01992 1997 2002 2007

Tort reform implemented

TexasUS

Medicare reimbursement per enrollee, adjusted for medical service inflation

Source: Public Citizen, December 2009

Note: Total malpractice payments decreased 67% between 2003 and

2008