Head for the HillsHead for the Hills

OCTEO Fall Meeting

October 23, 2008

Overview

• Setting the Context

• Federal Update

• Organizing a Day on the Square

Setting the Context

What Others are Saying about Us

Checker Finn – “Education school cartel [is] hindering talented people from becoming public-school teachers”

Kate Walsh – “…There are three possible explanations for this outcome: the teacher education establishment co-opted the alternative certification movement, or the teacher education establishment saw the writing on the wall and truly adapted its rigid traditional model to a new order. Or, it’s possible that a mix of the two occurred.”

NCLB Commission – Every panelist at the D.C. hearing gave education schools a C or worse for their efforts

Who is Coming to School2000-2020 (In Millions)

-1.83

1.11

6.5

1.2

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8

White African-American

Hispanic AsianMill

ions

of P

eopl

e

Reading Scientific Literacy Math

Finland Finland Hong Kong

South Korea Japan Finland

Canada Hong Kong South Korea

Australia South Korea Netherlands

Liechtenstein Liechtenstein Liechtenstein

New Zealand Australia Japan

Ireland Macao Canada

Sweden Netherlands Belgium

Netherlands Czech Republic Macao (China)

U.S. ranks # 19 / 40 U.S. ranks #20 / 40 U.S. ranks #28 / 40

2003 Pisa Results

TIMSS 2003Table 3. Average mathematics scale scores of eighth-

-grade students, by country: 2003

Country Average score

International average1 466

   

Singapore 605

Korea, Republic of 589

Hong Kong SAR2,3 586

Chinese Taipei 585

Japan 570

Belgium-Flemish 537

Netherlands2 536

Estonia 531

Hungary 529

Malaysia 508

Latvia 508

Russian Federation 508

Slovak Republic 508

Australia 505

(United States) 504

Lithuania4 502

NAEP Math Trends 2007

NAEP Reading Trends 2007

Trends from Another Perspective

“A pervasive lack of knowledge about foreign cultures and foreign languages threatens the security of the United States as well as its ability to compete in the global marketplace and produce an informed citizenry. The U.S. education system, has, in recent years, placed little value on speaking languages other than English or on understanding cultures other than one’s own.”

From International Education and Foreign Languages: Keys to Securing America’s Future (2007), Center for Education (National Research Council)

Trends from Another Perspective

1 in 4 adults say they didn’t read a book last yearTypical person claims to have read 4 books (last year)

AP-Ipsos Poll Aug. 2007

Less than 50% of Americans read novels, short stories and other literature and the rate the nation is losing young readers is increasing.

From Reading at Risk Nat’l Endowment for the Arts (2004)

There is a correlation between those who read and are socially engaged and their involvement in volunteer/charity work and participating in the arts and recreational activities (like ballgames) as compared to non-readers..

From Reading at Risk Nat’l Endowment for the Arts (2004)

"It's not just unfortunate, it's real cause for concern," said James Shapiro, a professor of English at Columbia University. "A culture gets what it pays for, and if we think democracy depends on people who read, write, think and reflect — which is what literature advances — then we have to invest in what it takes to promote that."

From the NY Times article on the 2004 NEA report

Post-Katrina

• 2005-2006 K-12 Loss of School– 138,000 students missed 2 months of

school– 20,000-30,000 students did not

attend school

• 2006-2007 K-12 Loss of School– 10,000-15,000 students were out of

schoolEducation After Katrina – Southern Education Foundation, August 2007

State Budgets• Ohio is expected to face a $733 million to

$1.3 billion budget gap in FY 2009 (Center on Budget and Policy Priorities)

• Every state, but one (Vermont) requires a balanced budget

• The vast majority of states cannot run a deficit or borrow to cover their operating expenditures.  As a result, states have three primary actions they can take during a fiscal crisis:  they can draw down available reserves, they can cut expenditures, or they can raise taxes.  (Center on Budget and Policy Priorities)

Under Pressure

• Dems mantra: Access, Affordability, Accountability

• Dems for Accountability

• Administration’s focus on outcomes

Higher Education Opportunity Act

Themes in Teacher Education Provisions

• Integrate HEA with NCLB and IDEA

• Emphasis on clinical preparation• Increased accountability and

planning• Invest in capacity building• Focus on shortages

Teacher Quality Partnership Grants

• Three programs merged into one• Required partners: school of ed,

school of arts and sciences, high-need LEA

• Focus on clinical preparation (including induction for 2 years, mentoring and coaching) at BA level; residency programs at MA level and leaders in rural areas

Teacher Quality Partnership Grants (cont.)

• Use of Funds– Required

• Strengthening pre-baccalaureate preparation or developing teacher residency programs

– Optional (only in conjunction with the “required”)• Preparing school leaders for rural

schools• Developing digital education content

Funding for Teacher Quality Partnerships Grants

• Authorized at $300 million• Last year funded at $34 million• Administration attempts to

eliminate every year• Senate included increase to $45

million • ADVOCACY NEEDED

Major Differences in Accountability Provisions

• No reporting dates• No waivers• No rankings or quartiles on pass rates• Focus on scaled scores for pass rates• Reporting of alternative route pass

rates by IHEs• Most IHE data reported to State and ED• No reporting in college catalogs

Westat

Other Items

• Goals and assurances for teacher development

• Admission criteria into program• Current program information (FTE faculty

and students in supervised clinical experience, avg. hours of clinical experience) will need to be in standard format

• Low performing and at-risk status• Use of technology• Teacher training in special education

Westat

Just for States • Reliability and validity of assessments• Certification requirements • Certification/licensure standards and alignment

with content standards• Alternative route info (descriptions, pass rates,

enrollment)• How TPPs are addressing shortages of HQTs• TPP’s preparation of SPED teachers• Uses of technology• TPPs preparation of teachers of students who

are LEP• Criteria for assessing performance of TPPs

Westat

Accountability for Teacher Preparation (cont.)

Teacher Development Provisions

o IHE’s must set annual quantifiable goals to increase number of teachers in math, science, special education, English language learners and other shortage areas

o IHE’s must provide assurances that• Preparation is tied to needs of state and LEAs where

they will likely teach• Special education teachers receive preparation in

core academic subjects• General education teachers receive preparation in

instructing students with disabilities• Candidates are prepared to teach in urban and rural

areas, as applicable

Accountability for Teacher Preparation (cont.)

• Release of Information provision– Applies to all states that receive

funds under HEOA– States must provide to preparation

programs data that will help evaluate the program or the program’s graduates

– Data could include• K-12 student achievement data and

demographic data• Teacher effectiveness evaluations

U.S. Department of Education Moving Forward on

Implementation

• Definitions – program, alternate route, “completed 100% nonclinical coursework”

• Centralized data collection model

• Will likely form advisory groups

TEACH Grant Amendments – Title IV

• Service Obligation Completion in State-listed shortage areas

• List of extenuating circumstances

• Program Report

New (but unfunded) Programs

• Title IV, Loan Forgiveness for Service in Areas of National Need

• Title VIII, Early Childhood Education Professional Development and Career Task Force

• Title II, Preparing Teachers for Digital Age Learners

• Title II, Adjunct Teacher Corps• Title II, Centers of Excellence• Title II, Graduate Fellowships to Prepare

Faculty in High-Need Areas in Colleges of Education

Teach for America

• Title VIII, Teach for America Authorization

Action Steps for Deans

• Conversations – president, faculty, assessment leaders and groups, policy makers

• Gear up for accountability• Advance your efforts in teacher

preparation research, shortage area production, teacher professional development, and teacher preparation and induction model developmentDr. Michael Miller, Dean of the College of

Education, Minnesota State University - Mankato

No Child Left Behind

No Child Left Behind - Overview

– K-12 student and school assessment is modified ----- multiple measures and growth models

– Highly-qualified definition not significantly modified

– Differentiation for SINOI– Targets funding to the schools in

most need– More flexibility for ELL testing– Data Systems

AACTE Supported Suit re interpretation of “Highly

Qualified” • Renee v. Spellings—a coalition of

parents, students, community groups• An ED regulation has created a

major loophole • Teachers-in-training defined as

“highly qualified”• Students of color and/or poor more

likely taught by intern teachers

Ohio Day on the Square

OCTEO Next Steps

• Infiltrating the state legislature– Building a presence in Columbus– Develop an advocacy agenda – State legislators provide a good pool

of candidates for U.S. Congress/Senate

• Developing tangibles with partners

Important DifferencesHigher Education World

Legislative World

Currency Knowledge Power, Politics

Purpose of Communication

Add to knowledge base

influence

Type of Communication

Articles, books Meetings, talking points

Pace Months, years Minutes, days, weeks

Nature of Process

Deductive inductive

Audience Other scholars voters

Key Activities Thinking, educating, researching

Making decisions, voting

Connecting State and Federal Priorities

• Data Systems -- accountability and information

• Teacher Retention ---- mentoring/induction

• Student Support --- TEACH Grants (front-load the money), articulation, clinical components, career-changers and non-traditional students

Developing Ohio Day on the Square

• What is it you want to accomplish? – Advocating on a specific bill– Introduce OCTEO– Provide information on educator

preparation in OH

• How do you want to carry it out?– Square visits– Briefing– Testimony– Reception

Developing Ohio Day on the Square (cont.)

• Appoint a Government Relations Committee

• Pick your date now• Check the ethics laws in your state• Make it easy for your members to

participate• Pick a target audience• Develop your glossy paper

Homework - Before

• Know your delegation– Are they (or family members) educators?– What bills have they sponsored or co-

sponsored?– Voting record

• Know what other stakeholders are doing• Find common ground• Form coalitions• Know the opposition

Talking Points

• Craft your message

• Make specific requests

• Hold them accountable

This is just the beginning of a beautiful friendship