hcdi seminar: fashion and technology evolution and the design of consumer products
Post on 18-Jan-2015
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTIONThe world of design is becoming increasingly aware of the dynamic nature of the context in which products are created and consumed. Designers must ensure that the products they develop will be relevant to consumers at the time of release and for the duration of the product’s shelf life. Design researchers must ensure that their theory accounts for this rapidly changing environment and its impact on the design of products. This is particularly key for modern consumer products that compete on both aesthetic and technical qualities and are undergoing constant change. Drawing on the extensive sociological, economic and organisational theories of technology evolution, and the theories of fashion that provide a rich, multi-disciplinary perspectives on the creation and consumption of aesthetic artefacts, this study explores how product categories evolve. It finds that there are several core concepts that are common to the evolution of different product categories. These findings are illustrated through a case study of the evolution of the mobile phone. They aim to promote discussion and further exploration of a complex and under-explored area of design.
- 1. Fashion and technology evolutionand the design of consumer productsAndrew Muir WoodMonday 12th September 2011
2. Fashion 3. Sproles, G. B., & Burns, L. D. (1994). Changing Appearances. New York: Fairchild Publications. 4. Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, Arousal and Curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill.Coates, D. (2003). Watches Tell More Than Time. New York: McGraw-Hill. 5. How wife?Wife good.Lloyd Jones, P. (1991). Taste Today. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Crane, D. (1999). Diffusion Models and Fashion: A Reassessment. The ANNALS ofthe American Academy of Political and Social Science, 566(1), 13-24. 6. Blumer, H. (1969). Fashion: From Class Differentiation to Collective Selection.The Sociological Quarterly, 10(3), 275-291. 7. Technology 8. Moore, G. E. (1965). Cramming more components onto integrated circuits.Electronics, 38(8). 9. Ansoff, H. I. (1984). Implanting Strategic Management. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International.Andriopoulos, C., & Gotsi, M. (2006). Probing the future: Mobilising foresight inmultiple-product innovation firms. Futures, 38(1), 50-66. 10. SchumpeterDosi, G., & Nelson, R. (1994). An introduction to evolutionary theories in economics.Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 4(3), 153-172.Christensen, C. M. (1997). The Innovators Dilemma: When New Technologies CauseGreat Firms to Fail. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. 11. Haddon, L. (2003). Domestication and mobile telephony. In J. E. Katz (Ed.),Machines that Become Us (pp. 43-55). New Jersey: Transaction.Pantzar, M. (1997). Domestication of Everyday Life Technology: Dynamic Views on the SocialHistories of Artifacts. Design Issues, 13(3), 52-65. 12. The artefact lens 13. 1930s 2000s 14. Simon-Miller, F. (1985). Commentary: Signs and Cycles in the Fashion System. In M. R. Solomon(Ed.), The Psychology of Fashion. New York: Institute of Retail Management. 15. 2000 2001 2002My study 16. FASHION THEORYTECHNOLOGY THEORY AREA OF INTEREST 17. Feedback to original problem Deep case study Broad case studiesIncompleteunderstanding of Theoreticala problem or foundationphenomenonImproved understanding 18. 100 80Ratios of skirt 60 width to height ofwomens gures 4020 01820 18401860 18801900 19201940Kroeber, A. L. (1919). On the principle of Order in Civilization as Exemplied by Changes of Fashion.American Anthropologist, 21(3), 235-263. 19. 100 80Ratios of skirt 60 width to height ofwomens gures 4020 Percentage of menwearing beards 01820 1840 186018801900 19201940Robinson, D. E. (1975). Style changes: cyclical, inexorable, and foreseeable.Harvard Business Review, 53(6), 121-131. 20. Mobile phone heights 21. Clustered by form factor 22. Mobile phone coloursBlack Charcoal Blue Other Grey Silver100%75%50%25% 0% 1996 20002004 2008 23. Roy, R. (1994). The evolution of ecodesign. Technovation, 14(6), 363-380. 24. Overlays 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 25. 2000 2001 20022003 2004 20052006 2007 2008 26. CHANGE P3 Change dimensionsPRODUCTSP1 P2Functional Physicaltype componentsTIME 27. EXTERNAL CONTEXTCHANGEP10 P11 P12 P15Influential Product SocioculturalPhases ofartefacts gatekeepers change change P3 ChangeP17 dimensions Change boundariesCOMMERCIAL CONTEXT P18ProductP13 P14 longevityCreative Marketstrategy responseP16TransitionsPRODUCTS GRADUAL CHANGERADICAL CHANGEP1 P2P4P5 P6 P7P8 P9Functional PhysicalProduct ProductDominant Discontinuous Radical product Disruptivetype componentscontinuityparadigmsproduct design changeinnovationproductTIME 28. Its all about the timing. 29. Discussion 30. Can we predict the future, or must weinvent it? Will the mobile industry be disrupted? Can you teach trend research/foresight? 31. e: email@example.comThanks! t: @muirface