gv280 politics in action revision lecture 1. 1. & 2. definitions and models 2
TRANSCRIPT
1
GV280Politics in Action
Revision lecture
2
1. & 2. Definitions and models
3
The exercise of power by parties, individuals
and groups, at the time when they are
collectively in control of the state, over matters
which are directly connected with the governing
of the state.
Public policy – working definition
4
Democratic model of public policy
Party A policies
ELECTION Party A WinsParty A policy
=public policy
Party B policies
PARTY POLICY ELECTION PUBLIC POLICY
5
Pluralist model of public policy
Pre-electionparty policy
Think tanks
Public opinion
Interest groups
Lobbyists
Post electiongovernment policy Public policy
Civil servants
6
• 1. The electorate
• 2. Politicians
• 3. Unelected officials
• 4. Elites
• 5. Interest groups
• 6. Big corporations
• 7. Think tanks
POSSIBLE ACTORS IN THE POLICY PROCESS
7
Pluralism& Rational choice
• Pluralist model: multiple actors are involved in bargaining over and setting public policy
• Rational choice model: actors seek to maximize the benefits they receive
• Not mutually exclusive
8
3. Essence of decision
9
Explaining policy makingIn searching for an explanation, one typically puts himself in the place of the nation, or national government, confronting a problem of foreign affairs, and tries to figure out why he might have chosen the action in question. … [We assume] government behaviour can be most satisfactorily understood by analogy with the purposive acts of individuals. In many cases this is a fruitful assumption. Treating national governments as if they were centrally coordinated, purposive individuals provides a useful shorthand for understanding problems of policy. But this simplification – like all simplifications – obscures as well as reveals. In particular, it obscures the persistently neglected fact of bureaucracy: the ‘maker’ of government policy is not one calculating decisionmaker but is rather a conglomerate of large organizations and political actors. (Allison, p. 3)
10
Model 1: The Rational Actor
• Possible rational explanations for Khrushchev’s actions
• i. Bargaining chip in negotiations over US missiles
• ii. Diversion/trap• iii. Defence of Cuba• iv. Cold War Politics• v. Missile power - a shortcut in the arms race
11
Model 2: Organizational Process
A government consists of a conglomerate of semi-feudal, loosely allied organizations, each with a substantial life of its own. … Governments perceive problems through organizational sensors. Governments define alternatives and estimate consequences as their component organizations process information; governments act as these organizations enact routines. Governmental behaviour can therefore be understood … less as deliberate choices and more as outputs of large organizations functioning according to standard patterns of behaviour. (Allison, p. 67)
12
• 1.THE CUBAN PROBLEM
• 2. THE STRATEGIC PROBLEM
• 3. THE BERLIN PROBLEM
• 4. THE ECONOMIC PROBLEM
Model 3: Bureaucratic Politics
13
4. The players: politicians, civil servants and interest groups
14
Pluralist model of public policy
Pre-electionparty policy
Think tanks
Public opinion
Interest groups
Lobbyists
Post electiongovernment policy Public policy
Civil servants
15
Pluralist model of public policy
Interest groups
Post electiongovernment policy Public policy
Civil servants
16
17
Traditional model of executive power
Prime minister (directs overall policy)
Cabinet (directs individual departmental policy)
Civil service (implements policy)
18
The Core Executive(Taken from Peter Dorey, Policy Making in Britain, Figure 3.1, p. 50)
19
Interest groups and policy networks
Based on resource exchange Dependencies between actors Degree of dependence of each actor can
vary with circumstances
20
Policy communities & issue networksD. Marsh and R A W Rhodes, ‘Policy networks in British politics’, in Marsh and Rhodes (eds), Policy Networks in
British Government (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992
21
5. Policy and ideology
22
6. Policy and public opinion
23
Edmund Burke, Speech to the Electors of Bristol
3 November 1774
“Your representative owes you, not his industry only, but his judgement; and he betrays, instead of serving you, if he sacrifices it to your opinion.”
24
Thermostatic model of opinion-policy relationship IV:Government policy on issue X overlaid on public opinion at t1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 220
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
25
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 220
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Thermostatic model of opinion-policy relationship V:Government policy on issue X overlaid on public opinion at t2
26
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 220
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Thermostatic model of opinion-policy relationship VI:Government policy on issue X overlaid on public opinion at t3
27
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 220
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Thermostatic model of opinion-policy relationship VII:Optimal government policy with normal distribution of public
opinion
28
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 220
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Thermostatic model of opinion-policy relationship VIII:Government policy on issue X overlaid on public opinion at t4
29
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 220
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Thermostatic model of opinion-policy relationship IX:Government policy realigned to reflect new distribution of
public opinion
30
7. The media and the agenda
31
John Kingdon,Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies
PROBLEMS
POLICIES
POLITICS
32
Example: 1945 implementation of the Welfare State
PROBLEM: the poverty of the 30s depression
POLICY: Beveridge’s welfare state proposals
POLITICS: Labour’s landslide victory in the 1945 general election
Policy window
33
8. Policy and finance
34
Treasury objectives
Provide funds for all government activities Limit expenditure to acceptable limits
Maintain control over departmental budgets Input into departments’ policy decisions
Keep expenditure within the bounds of the possible
Avoid excessive taxation (but also maintain necessary levels of taxation)
Maintain funding balance between departments
35
Departmental objectives
Fulfil service commitments Achieve targets set by minister/cabinet/PM Show it is vigorously pursuing policies
More spending = more effectiveness Maintain (or increase) funding levels as far as
possible Compete with other departments
36
Common interests
Maintain government’s reputation for competence Deliver effective services
Maintain government’s reputation for financial responsibility Keep costs within reasonable bounds Keep taxes as low as possible
37
Causes of tension
Departments believe Treasury sees everything in terms of money
Treasury believes departments don’t understand financial constraints
Departments believe other departments are over-funded
Overspending and underspending
38
9. Policy and ethics
39
John Stuart Mill’s harm principle
“The object of this essay is to assert one very simple principle, as entitled to govern absolutely the dealings of society with the individual in the way of compulsion and control. … The principle is, that the sole end for which mankind are warranted, individually or collectively, in interfering with the liberty of action of any of their number, is self-protection. That the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others. His own good, either physical or moral, is not a sufficient warrant.” - J. S. Mill, On Liberty and Other Essays ed. John Gray (Oxford: OUP, 1991), pp. 13-14
40
41
10. The international dimension
42
11. Policy and party competition
43
Duverger’s law
The simple-majority single-ballot system favours the two-party system
Maurice Duverger, Political Parties (London: Methuen, 1954), p. 217
44
Series1
Left-right policy spectrum
LEFTe.g.RedistributionState intervention
RIGHTe.g.
Private property rightsLimited government
45
Series1
Normal distributionof public policy preferences
LEFT RIGHT
46
Series1
Position of the median voter
LEFT median voter RIGHT
47
Series1
Positions of main political parties(notional)
LEFT median voter RIGHT
Lab LibDem Con
48
Series1
Positions of main political parties(1980s)
LEFT median voter RIGHT
Lab LibDem Con
49
Series1
Positions of main political parties(1997-2000s)
LEFT median voter RIGHT
LibDem Lab Con
50
Series1
Positions of main political parties(now?)
LEFT median voter RIGHT
Lab LibDem Con
51
11. Inside the think tank
52
• Long history – Fabians blazed the trail• ‘Traditional’ vs ‘advocacy’• Fill gap left by ideology …• … but were themselves influential in establishing ideologies• Helped Thatcherism to get established …• … and helped create New Labour• Evidence of direct impact on policy is thin …• … but they often set the tone for party policy …• … and ex-think tank personnel roam the corridors of power
53
12 Westminster and Whitehall: the legislature and the executive
54
• Executive – initiates legislation• Legislature – scrutinizes legislation (and the actions of
ministers)– Legislative debate– Parliamentary questions– Select Committees
• Civil service-ministerial relations: who is top?– Haldane report (1918) established relationship of
interdependency and cooperation between civil servants and ministers
– But this has eroded recently (more ideological/on message ministers, more special advisers)
55
13. Implementing public policy
56
The policy process (I)
Agenda setting/problem identification
Policy formulation/approval (e.g.
legislation)Implementation
57
The policy process (II)
Agenda setting/problem identification
Policy formulation/approval (e.g.
legislation)
Implementation