52H04NE0023 2 16231 LAC DES ISLES I010

GROUND MAGNETICAND VLF-EM SURVEY

LAC DES ILES CLAIM GROUP(Claims 1191464 and 1191467)

By:R.H. Sutcliffe

May 1995

Project Location - Lac des Iles areaThunder Bay Mining DivisionClaim Map - Lac des Iles (G-739)NTS Map Sheet - 52H/4Latitude and Longitude - 490 12'N 89035'W

f. 1 6231

R.H. Sutclifie, 7Q3 William Street, London. Ontario. N5Y 2R7 Telephone: (519) 438-3328/Fax: (519) 438-9229

SUMMARY

This report summarizes results of a ground magnetic and VLF-EM survey which was carried out to explore for stratiform platinum, palladium and gold mineralization in the ultramafic rocks of the Lac des Iles Complex. 80 km northwest of Thunder Bay. Ontario. The work was done on two contiguous block claims (claims 1191464 A 1191467) covering 13 claim units and is underlain by layered ultramafic rocks containing known sulphide mineralized "reefs" with highly anomalous precious metal values. As part of the program, a cut grid with a total length of 13 line kilometres and a line spacing of 100 metres was prepared prior to carrying out the geophysical survey. A total of 10,675 metres of line was sun eyed with a 25 metre station spacing. The magnetic survey was carried out with two GSM-18 Gem Systems Magnetometers using one instrument as a base station to correct for diurnal magnetic variation. The VLF-EM survey measured in-phase and quadrature components for transmitting stations at Seattle. Washington (NLK) at 18.6 kHz and Annapolis. Maryland (NSS) at 21.4 kHz. The present survey is a continuation of 17 line kilometres of ground magnetic and VLF-EM surveying carried out by R H. Sutcliffe on claims 119146? and H91464 in 1994.

The area is a region of strong magnetic contrasts with no simple correlation of rock types with total field magnetics. The strong contrasts in total field magnetics are considered to be largely due to variable alteration of the ultramafic rocks. Magnetic trends generally show good correlation with the strike of mapped lithologies and igneous layering. VLF-EM data for Annapolis transmissions are also consistent with magnetic trends. VLF-EM in-phase data has been filtered using a Fraser filter to assist in interpretation of conductor locations. The results of this survey provide good evidence for the continuation of units or structures hosting the mineralized reefs for at least 400 to 500 metres into the north part of the claim group. In addition, previously untested anomalies have similar characteristics to the anomalies associated with the known mineralized "reefs".

During surveying a previously unreported occurrence of chromite was found in altered peridotite in claim 1191464.

LOCATION AND ACCESS

The Lac des Iles Complex is a mafic to ultramafic intrusive complex located 80 km northwest of Thunder Bay. Ontario (Figure l). The Complex is host to significant platinum, palladium and base metal mineralization.

The claim group can be accessed from Lac des Iles or from a system of logging roads which reach within 1.5 km of the northeastern corner of the claim group. An all-weather gravel road, constructed to give access to the Lac des Iles Mines Ltd. property, connects the south shore of Lac des Iles to highway 527 and is located 5 km south of the claim group. For the present work program the claim group was accessed by the logging road system.

PROPERTY

The claims OD which this survey was carried out consist of two contiguous, unpatented. block claims which were staked by R.H. Sutcliffe and are recorded on the Lac des Iles area claim map (G-739), Thunder Bay Mining Division. The claims are wholly owned by R.H. Sutcliffe. 793 William Street. London. Ontario. N5Y 2R7. The details of the claims on which this work was carried out is tabulated below.

Claim Number

1191464

1191467

Number L^nits

9

4

Staking Date

August 12/1993

March 5/1994

Recording Date

August 23/1993

March 25/1994

Total units: 1 3

PREVIOUS EXPLORATION

Area - Economic interest in the Lac des Iles region was initially for copper-nickel sulphide mineralization in mafic and ultramafic rocks. Since the 1970's exploration interest has focussed on platinum group elements, particularly palladium and platinum. In 1975 and 1976. exploration work in the gabbroic rocks immediately south of Lac des Iles by Boston Bay Mines Limited and Texasgulf Canada Limited revealed a deposit of 20.4 million tonnes grading 6.34 g/t Pd-^Pt. 0.62 g/t Au. and G.22% Cu-Ni named the Roby Zone (The Northern Miner, v. 62. October 21 . p. 27. 1976: Canadian Mines Handbook. 1976-1977. p. 314). Lac Des Iles Mines Ltd. initiated production on the Roby Zone in November 1993 and is presently mining 3.000 tonnes per day from an open pit mine. The mine is located 5 km south of the claim group.

Claim Group - The most significant work carried out on the claim group was performed under a joint venture by Equinox Resources Limited and Technigen Corporation between 1986 and 1987. Equinox held a group of 37 contiguous claims which covered the present claim group. In 1986 and 1987. the joint venture carried out geochemical studies (625 soil samples. 224 rock samples), geological mapping, airborne geophysical surveys (Questor. Input Mk VI FM Macnctic Survey), ground geophysics (Rideau Geophysics. Induced Potent ia! Resistivity Survey) and diamond drilling (2 holes for a total of 603 metres). One ot the drill holes (257 metres) was located on the present claim group. Significant results (as reported in the Assessment Files Research Office. Ministry of Northern Development and Mines. Toronto) included the delineationdf two Slllnhlflp-H^arino stmtaHrmnH tavi^r*: tfrmprl "rw^fV Avithin thp u ltronnafir c^nncncc \nmtf*i\VFI t " \J ^UIpIIlUV ^\V *A*AU^ OUUUA*^ vlAAftl* lu J l. A u IWIIUVV* ft*.*,***; t ' AUAU* UAW IA1U UAAAt** Ax. .-**. fcflAW&A*. w lvs*,ul*.*A

on the present Lac des Iles claim group. Maximum assay values of up to l .68 g/t Pt-*-Pd and 0.26 g/t Au have been determined in the reefs. The one drill hole intersected 3 feet with 0.85 e t Pt-Pd and 0.07 g/t Au. Ratios of Pt to Pd are typically on the order of l :3 in the reef.

In February and March 1994, R.H. Sutcliffe carried out 17 kilometres of ground magnetic and VLF surveys over claims 1191463 and 1191464. The present survey is a continuation of surveying carried out in 1994.

GEOLOGY

The claim group is underlain by ultramafic and lesser mafic intrusive rocks of the northern part of the Archean age Lac des Iles Complex (Figure l ). Mapping by Sutcliffe and Sweeny (Ontario Geological Survey, Geological Series Preliminary Map P. 3047, 1986) defined three major rock units in this area. These are: serpentinite and serpentinized peridotite (composed of pyroxene and serpentinized olivine); clinopyroxenite (composed dominantly of clinopyroxene): and websterite (composed of both clinopyroxene and orthopyroxene). Locally the websterite contains interstitial plagioclase and is termed gabbronorite. In the claim group, these rock units form layers on a scale of 100 metres in width. Metre-scale igneous layering defined by varying proportions of minerals is locally present. Layering dips 35" to 600 northwest and strikes at approximately 0300. parallel to the strike of the rock units. The repetition of lithologies indicates that several cycles of crystallization, probably resulting from repeated injection of magma, has occurred. The cycles from peridotite to clinopyroxenite to websterite indicate mat the top of the sequence is to the west.

Minor amounts of sulphide mineralization, typically consisting of less than I 0'o chalcopyrite and pyrrhotite, are particularly associated with the websterite and gabbronorite layers. A grab sample of ultramafic rock with less than 1*4 chalcopyrite mineralization from the claim group collected during OGS mapping assayed 220 ppb Au, 350 ppb Pt, and 2.200 ppb Pd (Lindhardt and Sutcliffe. 1986. Ontario Geological Survey, Miscellaneous Paper 132. pages 80 to 81.). Subsequent exploration by Equinox and Technigen delineated two stratiform sulphide "reefs". several metres thick and continuous over a strike length of up to 800 metres. These "reefs" contain only small amounts of sulphide yet they have highly anomalous precious metal values of up to l .68 g/t Pt+Pd and 0.26 g/t Au.

GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY

Grid

The ground magnetic and VLF-electromagnetic surveys were carried out over the property utilizing a cut grid with a line spacing of 100 metres (Figure 2). The total length of the cut grid including the base line at 0300 is 13,080 metres. The grid lines at 1200 were picketed with a 25 metre station spacing.

Instrumentation

Two model uSM-iS Gem Systems Magnetometers were used for the magnetic survey. The GSM-18 is a portable proton precession magnetometer with a built-in microprocessor and memory. The GSM-18 has a resolution of 0.1 gamma and an accuracy of 0.2 gammas over the

operating range of 20.000 to 100.000 gammas.

One model EM-16 Geonics VLF receiver was used for the VLF-electromagnetic survey. The EM-16 measures In-phase and quadrature components of the vertical magnetic field as a percentage of the horizontal primary field. The instrument has a sensitivity of -/-I 0'o for both In-phase and quadrature components.

Surveying

Raw data collected by the mobile magnetometer (S/N 51240) was corrected for diurnal magnetic variation against the base station readings. Reduced magnetic data was transferred to a PC computer via a Gem Systems communication interface and RS-232 port.

The VLF-EM survey measured In-phase and Quadrature components for two transmitting stations. The stations used were: Seattle, Washington (NLK) at 18.6 kHz located at 48" 12' N 121 0 55' W (Channel l): and Annapolis. Maryland (NSS) at 21.4 kHz located at 380 59' N 760 27' W (Channel 2). Figure 3 shows the orientation of the stations and the directions in which readings were taken with respect to the grid. Readings for channel l (Seattle) were taken in a SSE direction and readings for channel 2 (Annapolis) were taken in a SW direction. VLF-EM readings were recorded manually.

Surveying was carried out between May 11 to May 17, 1995.

Results

The results of the survey are presented on the ten accompanying 1:5,000 scale maps which are as follows:

Map I) - Geological CompilationMap 2) - Total Field Magnetics - Line PostingMap 3) - Total Field Magnetics -Line ProfilesMap 4) - Total Field Magnetics - Contour MapMap 5) - VLF-EM Survey - Seattle (NLK) 18.6 kHz - Line PostingMap 6) - VLF-EM Survey - Seattle (NLK) 18.6 kHz - Line ProfilesMap 7) - VLF-EM Survey - Seattle (NLK) 18.6 kHz - Fraser Filtered In-Phase Contour MapMap 8) -VLF-EM Survey - Annapolis (NSS) 21.4 kHz - Line PostingMap 9)- VLF-EM Survey - Annapolis (NSS) 21.4 kHz - Line ProfilesMap 10)-VLF-EM Survey - Annapolis (NSS) 21.4 kHz - Fraser Filtered In-Phase Contour Map

The location of the survey grid with respect to Lac des lies and the claim boundaries is siiown on Figure 2 and Map l. Contour maps were made using a bi-directional griding algorithm and 12.5 metre grid cells. No directional filtering was applied to the contour maps.

Total Field Magnetics - The arra is a region of strong magnetic contrasts with no simple

correlation of rock types with total field magnetics. The strong contrasts in total field magnetics are considered to be largely due to variable alteration of the ultramafic rocks. Known outcrops of magnetite-rich serpentinite, however, correlate with magnetic lows. This may explained by the fact that paleomagnetic investigations of samples from the Lac des Iles Complex show evidence of having acquired a reversely magnetized remnant magnetic component which is probably due to Keweenawan thermal overprinting (Prof. H. C. Palmer, University of Western Ontario, personal communication, 1986).

I'Lt'-EM - VLF-EM data for both Seattle and Annapolis transmissions show broadly consistent trends. VLF-EM trends are also generally consistent with magnetic trends. VLF-EM In-phase data has been filtered using a Fraser filter to assist in interpretation of anomaly locations. The Fraser filter converts the cross-over from positive to negative In-phase readings into a positive response. The Fraser filter must be applied in a consistent sense with respect to the survey lines. Annapolis data was filtered using the filter up the lines ( i.e. east to west), while Seattle data was filtered using the filter down the lines ( i.e. west to east). On the Fraser filtered contour maps, only positive (red) anomalies are considered significant. These zones are considered to represent the approximate position of conductors and are referred to as VLF-EM conductors in the following discussion.

Interpretation

Magnetic trends and VLF-EM conductor trends, particularly for the Annapolis channel, are broadly consistent and suggest a change in trend from approximately 0300 in the south of the grid to approximately OOO0 in the north.

All of the mapped serpentinite and peridotite units (map unit l) are associated with magnetic lows and coincident VLF-EM conductor trends for the Seattle channel.

The sulphide "reef which crosses lines 1700N and l SOON at approximately 100E is associated with a strong magnetic high and VLF-EM conductor indicated by the Annapolis channel. The sulphide "reef* which crosses line 1800N at 300E is associated with a VLF-EM conductor indicated by both the Annapolis and Seattle channels. While the anomalies are probably related to structures or rock units hosting the "reef mineralization, rather than a response to the mineralization itself, the geophysical data provides evidence for the continuation of structures or units related to these reefs into the north part of the grid.

A break in magnetic patterns, trending at approximately 0700 through 1700N-250W and 2100N- 175F. suggests that minor faulting may have locally disrupted the igneous stratigraphy. A sinistral displacement is suggested by the offset of the prominent magnetic highs between lines 2000N and 2100N.

DISCOVERY OF A CHROMITE OCCURRENCE

During the magnetometer survey, a new occurrence of chromite was observed in altered peridotite between lines 1900N and 2000N at approximately 200E. The chromite occurs as rinds up to l cm thick on rounded decimeter-scale inclusions of gabbro with sulphide mineralization which are hosted by altered peridotite. Grab samples were taken for assay purposes.

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER WORK

The Lac des Iles Complex formed from a precious metal enriched magma as indicated by the number of known precious metal occurrences in the complex. In the claim group, the presence of stratiform "reefs" with small amounts (*^1 0 6) of sulphide mineralization but highly anomalous precious metal values indicates that sulphides effectively concentrated precious metals in this sequence of rocks. The rational for further work is that discovery of a new "reef or a part of the known "reefs" with 3 to 49/* sulphide is likely to contain ore-grade precious metal values. Previous exploration did not determine the full strike extent of the mineralized "reefs", test for increased precious metal concentrations at depth, or test for other mineralized layers. The "reefs" are considered to warrant further exploration.

Tile results of this survey provide good evidence for the continuation of units or structures hosting the mineralized reefs into the north part of the claim group. This suggests an extension of the known mineralized units for at least 400 to 500 metres to the north. In addition, the survey indicates that previously untested anomalies, such as the VL-F-EM conductor crossing l SOON at 425W. have similar characteristics to the anomalies associated with the known mineralized "reefs".

Further work on the Lac des Iles claim group should involve additional geological mapping and lithogeochemical sampling. Ratios of precious metal to sulpher should be used to predict horizons with the greatest probability for concentrating precious metals. In the precious metal "reef type environment these horizons will generally be at the lowest stratigraphic level at which sulphur saturation was achieved. This mapping and sampling will have the purpose of prioritizing targets for drilling.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Tlie author thanks Mr. E wan Downie and the crew of Vytyl Exploration Services for cutting the grid. Dr. W. A. Morris, of Morris Magnetics, is thanked for providing rental of the geophysical equipment.

Piupctry TUinfina -,

49*15'

Proterozoic

l l DUbweArchean

Granitoid rock*

Lac des Iles C omplex

Ultramafic rock*

Gabbro. Gabbronorite

Hornblende gabbro

Platinum Group Etemeat Occurrence

Platinum Group Element Ore Deposit

Road

Fault

Lineannent

Cliim BOUD d tryFigure l

i C ) c n Q ,~-"-' \1 i -""^'---TlV /T ————— -'

! n 400 \ s~r i^ C ' U tw |^- " ^- — r ^|

j metres \ ,-^ 7 o v — \i r "'

R. HL Sutcliffe Claim Group Thunder Bay Mining Division Claim Map - Lac des Des (G-739) NTS Map Sheet -52H/4 Latitude and Longitude -49 12 N 89 35 W

Fig. 2. Grid fer Geophysical Survey

North A

Seattle Channel l

Anaapolis Channel 2

Lao des Ue*

Seattle (NLK)- 18.6kHl

Annapolis (NSS)- 21.4kHz

49 13*N 89 35'W

48 12V 121 55*W

3* 59-N 76 2TW

Figure 3. Survey orientation and VLP-BM surrey parameters.

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Ontario

Report of Work Conducted After Recording Claim

Mining Act

Transaction Number

2.l 623 rPervonal information collected on this form is obtained under the authority of the Mining Act. This information will be used for correspondence. Questions about this collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager, Mining Lands, Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, Fourth Floor, 159 Cedar street. Sudbury. Ontario. P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264.

Instructions: - Please type or print and submit in duplicate.- Refer to the Mining Act and Regulations for r

Recorder.- A separate copy of this form must be complc- Technical reports and maps must accompan;- A sketch, showing the claims the work is ass

52H04NE0023 2 16231 LAC DES ISLES 900RecordedHolder(s)

r1/-Client No.

Address

713 A) SV 2#7Telephone No.

Mining Division Township/Area

LAC

M or G Plan No.

Dates Work Performed

From: **A .. o rt r} Y J

To: y 27.Work Performed (Check One Work Group Only)

Work Group

vX ^Geotechnical Survey

Physical Work, Including Drilling

Rehabilitation

Other Authorized Work

Assays

Assignment from Reserve

Type

TcVrflc Pe*.D nAGveT,c. \iL,F~tH .

RCCCWCD

OC1 1 -35

MINING LAUub driANCH

Total Assessment Work Claimed on the Attached Statement of Costs

Note: The Minister may reject for assessment work credit all or part of the assessment work submitted if the recorded holder cannot verify expenditures claimed in the statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification.

Persons and Survey Company Who Performed the Work (Give Name and Address of Author of Report)Name Address

K. /7- 713

(attach a schedule If necessary)

Certification of Beneficial Interest * See Note No. 1 on reverse side

l certify that at the time the work was performed, the claims covered in this work report were recorded in the current holder's name or held under a beneficial interest by the current recorded holder.

Date Recor or Agent

Certification of Work Report

l certify that l have a personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this Work report, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and annexed report Is true.

Namajmd AcK;'/.Address of Person Certifying

0/07Telepone No. Dat

ror Office Use OnlyTotal Value Cr. Recorded Date Recorded

THUNDER BAY

Deemed Approval Data

tilt. 11/9*

ing Recorder

Date Approved

Date Notice for Amendments Sent

SEP 1

I [03/91)

51 Go

rvTr

i

^

-^

tI/O

^

-o

-L

r*

Work Report Number for Applying Reserve

l!Number Note 2)

CO ige.9,3

1N)

N-J) (X)-4 o Sil!

fif? I*

s(A)

8

liI

5 >

uK*

Credits you are claiming in this report may be cut back. In order to minimize the adverse effects of such deletions, please indicate from which claims you wish to priorize the deletion of credits. Please mark (^) one of the following:

1. D Credits are to be cut back starting with the claim listed last, working backwards.

2. Q^Credits are to be cut back equally over all claims contained in this report of work.

3. G Credits are to be cut back as priorized on the attached appendix.

In the event that you have not specified your choice of priority, option one will be implemented.

. 1 6231

Note 1: Examples of beneficial Interest are unrecorded transfers, option agreements, memorandum of agreements, etc., with respect to the mining claims.

Note 2: If work has been performed on patented or leased land, please complete the following:

l certify that the recorded holder had a beneficial interest in the patented or leased land at the time the work was performed.

Signature Date

Ontario

Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Ministers du Oeveloppement du Nord et des mines

Statement of Costs for Assessment Credit

Etat des couts aux fins du credit devaluation

Mining Act/Loi sur les mines

Transaction No /N 0 de transaction

2.1.6231Personal information collected on this form is obtained under the authority of trie Mining Act. This information will be used to maintain a record and ongoing status of the mining claim's). Questions about this collection should be directed to the Provincial Manager, Minings Lands, Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, 4th Floor, 159 Cedar Street, Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264.

Les renseignements personnels contenus dans la presente tormuie sem recueillis en vertu de la Lol sur les mines et serviront A tenir a jour un reg sve des concessions mimeres Adresser toute quesiton sur la coiiece ae ces renseignements au chef provincial des terrains mmiers. mmistere Cu Developpement du Nord et des Mines, 159. rue Cedar. 46 etage. SuCS-ry (Ontario) P3E 6A5. telephone (705) 670-7264

1. Direct Costs/Gouts directs

Type

Wage* SclalrM

Contractor's nd Consultant'sF*MOrottsda r*ntr*pr*rwur t d* rcxpert- conavll

Supples UsMl Foumltur** utillsfe*

Equipment ftontal Location d* mat4rtol

Description

Labour Main-d'oeuvre

Field Supervision Supervision sur le terrain

Type

L. f A/ tf C •tt TT' rv ,

Typo ,-7^,--^cTrv.^V.'L Mi-'A-

CJL V^*?'G:^

Amount Montan!

i.Vc-c- tC

fc^7.c -

s. ^^

2 ± li

.

Type

H(\(} i^r'-C'M^^"

iTotal Direct Costs

Total des couts directs

Totals ; Total global

flco.**'

,

Sbi7. ^

i

i i

71 ^

fco. 6"

1703^'

2. Indirect Costs/Couts indirects* * Note: When claiming Rehabilitation work Indirect costs are not

allowable as assessment workPour le remboursement des travaux de rehabilitation, les couts indirects ne sont pas admissibles en tant que travaux devaluation

Type Description

Transportation Transport

Amount j Totals Montan! Total glosal

Type

/\ Pic

j Food and ; Lodging . Nourriture et 1 hebergement

Mobilization and : Demobilization j Mobilisation et

demobilisation

i . t fit, ' t t- t

Sub Total of Indirect Costs Total partiel des couts indirects

Amount Allowable (not greater than 20H of Direct Costs) Montan! admissible (n'excedant pas 20 H des couts directs)

Total Value of Assessment Credit (ToUI of Direct end Allowable Indirect costs)

Valeur totale du creditdevaluation(Tom des couts directset Indirects tdmissiWes

S St

Not*: The recorded holder will be required to verify expenditures claimed in this statement of costs within 30 days of a request for verification If verification is not made, the Minister may reject for assessment work all or part of the assessment work submitted.

Note : Le titulare enregistre sera tenu de verifier les depenses demandees cars le present etat des couts dans les 30 jours suivant une demande a cet effet. Si la verification n'est pas effectuee, le mmistre peut rejeter (out ou une partie des travaux devaluation presentes.

Filing Discounts Remises pour depot

1. Work filed within two years of completion is claimed at the above Total Value of Assessment Credit.

of 1. Les travaux deposes dans les deux ans suivant leur achevement sont rembourses a 100 "A de la valeur totale susmentionnee du credrt devaluation

2. Work filed three, four or five years after completion is claimed at 5Q9fa of the above Total Value of Assessment Credit. See calculations below:

Total Value of Assessment Credit Total Assessment Claimed

x 0.50

2 Les travaux deposes trois. quatre ou cinq ans apres leur achevemeni sont rembourses a 50 "/b de la valeur totale du credit devaluation susmentionne Voir les calculs ci-dessous.

Valeur totale du credit devaluation

x 0,50

Evaluation totale demanaee

Certification Verifying Statement of Costs Attestation de I'etat des couts

l hereby certify:that the amounts shown are as accurate as possible and these costs were incurred while conducting assessment work on the lands shown on the accompanying Report of Work form.

O-.... , ,- hat as - L. ^ t-/

(Recorded Holder. Ageni. Positron in Company)

!o make this certification

J'atteste par la presente :que les montants indiques sont le plus exact possible et que ces depenses ont ete engagees pour effectuer les travaux devaluation sur les terrains indiques dans la formule de rapport de travail ci-join:

l am authorized Et qu'a litre de _________________ je suisenregistre. represertam. poste occupe aa r s '3 cc^pas" e

a faire cette attestation.

S gralufe Dale

212(04/91)

1—————————————^———————T———————— Nota - Dans cette formule. lorsqj il oSsigne des personnes. 'e mascuhn est util.se au sers r-

OntarioMinistry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines

Ministere du Developpement du Nord et des Mines

Geoscience Approvals Office 933 Ramsey Lake Road 6th Floor Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6B5

Telephone: (705) 670-5853 Fax: (705) 670-5863

Our File: 2.16231 Transaction /W9540.00261

December 28, 1995

Mining RecorderMinistry of Northern Development 6 MinesSuite B003435 James Street SouthThunder Bay, OntarioP7E 6E3

Dear Mr. Weirmeir:

RE: APPROVAL OF NOTICE OF REDUCTION I88DED ON MINING CLAIMS 1191464 ET XL. IN LAC DES ISLES AREA.

The assessment work credits as outlined in the notice of reduction dated November 09, 1995 have been approved as of December 28, 1995. The credits have been approved under Section 14, Geophysical(MAG,VLF), Mining Act Regulations.

Please indicate this approval on the claim record sheets.

If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact Bruce Gates at (705) 670-5861.

Yours sincerely, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY:

Ron C. GashinskiSenior Manager, Mining Lands Section Mining and Land Management Branch Mines and Minerals Division

BIG/jl Enclosure:

cc: Resident GeologistThunder Bay, Ontario

Assessment Files Library Sudbury, Ontar io

M o

O

c i I ?

f s

s V

a

a

f" P

b

oz o

r c.

O

Om

332

5

J? i

J5m

r-

-^

2 K

o

30 m X

D

3} 20

O (A

2) m

Tl

m

?]

m

z

o

m

JL

P) r G) i* m o i cri

rv)

TIB

L

AK

E

G-2

66

0

1200

772

MA

X

LA

KE

G

-74

1

i m m m o i ^

ro tO

c > JO U5

OD

OJ

CD l CD

o

.n z

*"

(D

O)

:"('r

t -~*

r1

O

E;

Co

o (P 3

O 3-

2

O (u 3 a

t- -JL a

ffi

t ri1

H

Mc -

l—

m en

O m

H :r if

o

m

:o

H Ju C z o

m

s b: p co

> 33

CD

w CD

CD

2CO

O

O rn O) m

co

J

KJ

x S

m O I

to CO

GO

-- "S;

o z

n-

Z m

n >

r

^ *5 7D JO 3

3 --

<

33

O f

m

33

S

m

0

m

:JJ

m

2*

^ i

m 2

58*1

Z

f"

*-*

'^

Pa

l" ±

H

Cm

o

•o '

n S

2

i-

m co m C 2

S "^

So

n

5m

m

oo

2^

O

?

O

l l

c -i

^l* 33

rO

^I

5 l

GO

2

O

Ci5

3D I H

C/

l

-o

rn O •n O

O

O C

S

m Z

-o*

CO 3 S

CO tj o CO o •n

O O

CO

S

2

O

33

co

-n

zz

J 5

S i

B i

Bii-li*

~~

-^

*n

C

33C

Z

HO

I

HO

O

< -

i?^

CO

Z

^5

5i

o z

o 33 m^

—.

"~co

O

-pi^

E im

z -c

co m

O

n o

o o

2 E

GO

CD

H

2m

o?

5

33 m

o CO

co O

Z

m

coo

OD

m>

CO

CO

'

I z O

33

O C Z

o•o 30

O m 1/5 m

n

en PTi

om

oo

H i

co j;

co

f" ; ir X

to

i

So!

m T

I - : o

ml 3

3 I-

o m—

c Z

31

1. "

D I

??

^ oO

5,^

m

f z

^Z

5-

^zQ

^m

CO

TI

H H

g2m

O

m >

c

Z 2

co o

o c

o 0 ^

^

— o

2 ji

2co

c r:

co ^

mz9

2 O

z O

r- 2

5 c

o n

H3

m >

: r m

H w

Q -

g ;

o -

5 2

w r

I

3Jm

w

m

- m

OB

*"

io

-n01

o to x

m WJ o o

m

w

O

TD

O

O 3D

m •n

m •x

m

z

o

m C/)

800 WEST

700 WEST

50

600 ERST

700 ERST

800 ERST

900 ERST

1000 ERST. 16231

Sulphide "reer | 2

Websterite, gabbronorite

Sulphide mineralization

Clinopyroxenite

Serpentinite, peridotite

Chromite mineralization

03 O O•z.o

ro o O O

o ^J—(•x

Oo

o -yo-4I

ro ro O O

o •70 200

Lac des Iles Claim Group

Scale 1:5,000

R. H. Sutcliffe May 1995

52H04NE0023 2 16231 LAC DES ISLES 210

ro ro ro-Jo0

zQ73— lI

COoO

zo73—1 I

COoO

3;oPO—l 1C

OooEOT:-Hi

h-OQ

ZO

—1DC

roDozO

-HI

(j5OO

2:o—1zc

Ji.CiO

2:o73— 1X

800 HEST

700 WEST

600 WEST

500 HEST

40Q WEST

300 WEST

200 WEST

100 WEST

100 ERST

200 ERST

300 ERST

400 ERST

500 EflST

BOO EflST

700 ERST

800

900 EflST

1000 EflST

o o

oTO-l:r

GO O O

oTO -HT.

O O

O-lre

roo o o

Q TO

N)t—'D O

Z O

Mo o

oTO

O)o o

o30

ro-^. o o

oTO

800 HEST

700 WEST

BOO WEST

500 WEST

400 NEST

300 WEST

200 WEST

100 NEST

100 ERST

200 EflST

300 EflST

400 ERST

500 EflST

600 EflST

700 EflST

300 EflST

900 EflST

1000 ERST

O 100 200

metres

2. 16231Lac des Iles Claim Group

Contour Interval 500 gammas

R.H. SutcliffeMay 1 995

52H04NE00232 16231 LACDE5i ISLES

220

-j D

•z. o 33

aa O o

a3D

OO

a 3JH

r-o o oO

a 3D

fOl—*oci

a 33

ro O

r-oCaioa

a P3

OO

a 3D

800 WEST

700 WEST

600 WEST

500 WEST

400 WEST

300 NEST

2DQ WEST

IDD WEST

O

100 ERST

200 EflST

300 ERST

400 ERST

500 EflST

600 EflST

700 ER5T

600 EflST

900 ERST

000 EflST

-J oo

o 33

00ao

a 33

CDa

a

ro O Oo•z.o 33

O a

a 33

ro K) Q o

Z a 3D

O a•z.d

ro 4k O a

Z a 33

800 NEST

700 WEST

600 WEST

500 WEST

4QO WEST

300 WEST

200 WEST

IDD WEST

D

100 EflST

200 ERST

300 ERST

400 ERS, -- T

O J

500 ERST

600 EflST

700 ERST

300 EflST

300 EflST

1000 EflST

4.16231Seattle Chinned

\Directioi \ ofiBBdingi V-

Baseline030 0

0 104BBaagaaaamut:

met

\-^Survey line 120 0

) 200res

Lac des Iles Claim Group VLF-EM SURVEY

Seattle (NLK) 18.6 kHz Fraser Filtered In-Phase Data (Filter Down)

Scale 1 :5,000

Contour Interval 5% R.H. Sutcliffe May 1995

52H04NE0023 2 16231 LAC DES ISLES 230

o o•z.o 73

CD O Q

O 73

CD O O

O

—lm

IXJo o o

o 73

Kl

D Q

O 73

M M O O

O50

roLO oQ•z.Q;*j

fO

o o

o XI

800 WEST

700 WEST

600 WEST

500 WEST

40Q WEST

300 WEST

200 WEST

100 WEST

0

100 EflST '.

58529.8 i59089-558760.7

58687.258328.058233.6 -58123-5 58392-4 -58235.358516.0 '58651-4 - 58445.1 -58513-3 -59D4B.7 -58523.8 -

56337-0 -59656-7 -58781-7 -58759-2 -

532ZS.1 '' 59129.0 -

56445-659852-9 58728-158873-457614.760416-0 - 60809.4 -58054-8 -58167.358234-8 58587.5 '58716-8

59315.4 57400.261150.5

60233-6 -- 59939.9 '

59936.6' 80062.6 -- 59935.4 -- 58662-7 -

58503-0 -5S824.Q -

59023.7 -56613.2 - 58450-3 -58592-8 -5BB54.5 -

57839. B - ' 56717.7 -

58321-4 -58622-5 -58225-2 -

5BBB7.3 -

56908.5 '- 59458-e -

59263-9 - ' 59077.2 -

58919-5 -

5ani2.s -80044.6 ' 59539.1 -58109-9 -

- 58383-0 -

58390-6 58626. S -56806.2 ' 69285 .359554.6 - 59946.4 -52676-0 i83101.7 '

200 EflST

300 EflST

400 EflST !

60743-0 -61589-453317.5 61028.360561.662092.2

1 60063.5 58648-459595.7

80591-9

500 EflST !

BOO ERST

59159.1 -

- 597SQ.7 - 59606-1 -

- 59665.5- 60353.6 -

- 60233-6 59305.4 -

58943. Q -

58605.6 -58S65.8 - 59555-8 -58954-U -5SB75.3 -

58B4B.4 -

60541.0' 59599.2 -

60493-0 -58537-4 -

55254.2 -

58812.7 '' 56671-6- 58942-9

58940.468558-0 -

' 54551.2 -56734-6 - 59050-7 -59865.6 -

- 58596.5 -- 58558 -G - 58S47.9

' 59163.0 56846.1 -58977.3 - 59584.6 -67057-7

' 61435.057776.1

•56347-161330.6 -56303.4 -58.030. Q 58352-2 '

1 59586-2 '64344.459055.3 - 59227-459562.559705.057968-5 58810.359075.653763-7 -5S97S.fi - 58505-958969-1 -

700 EflST-

57631.1 . 58791.5 800 WEST

59374-7' 59180-2- 58762.7

56357-9 7 0Q W EST59603-960218-559724-4 57954-5 T 59071-4 ^00 WEST

59023.1 -5907Q.O -59285-7 - 58386-3 -58681 -E -55339.0 -59128.2 -

56110-0 '59396.5 -

58588-1 -58884-5 -

- 5B3B1 .1 '

58762-256667-1 .58992.2 59404-4 -

' 60145-15DB31.E58766-3 ' 59170.5 -58880.0 '58864-658975-0 5S1Q6.9

- 58934-0

56708-2 J 59049.2 -50797-0

80047-556793.0 58386.858841.4 -

' 58035-353515.3 J 60873.3 J

59323.859409.759359.7

- 59860.9 500 WEST59244-5

' BD392.2 -

58524.7

' 56040.0' 58023.7- 58159-9- 57516-6

5B7SS . l58608.056614.758620-1 59031-959151 -B

58734.7

59054.7 59036.3 -59045-5 -59230.059368.8

' 59192.7 -

59518.7"flWT.o -

58056-4 - 58616.3 -57175-559129-5

' 59133.7 59407.559068.9 -59927-158285.8 -

L 58682.6 '63197.2

- 60060.9L 58393.7 k 59485-3

59353.1

56959.256696.5 58420.160230-457795-45S241 .fi - 59420.157662-658471.158536-7 58747-9 -5aaa4.B -

-

800 ERST--

- 58S20.9 - 6U3Q.9

5951D.5

58637.0 '58947-i 59208.758775-359439.9 -5S73S.3 '

59875.059020-659166.859041-6 59477-1

59557.7

59549-3 '59573.0 -

53224.858437-1 -53447.3

900 ERST'-

1000 EflST--

r 58807-558450.5

5BD54.1 56479.4 400 WEST58835-1

' 58711-758882-0 59056.059048.1

' 59570-658975-9

' 58885-859104 -2

5BSB7.4

59300-3 58935-159231-659578.759229-8 82028.0 -66531.7 68958.768645.6 68539.9 -55847-156839-180601.3

- 59219.8- 58832-4 -

58715-753741 .3 - 60922-2 -59155.3 J

ED294.0 300 WEST

- 59169.5' 60768.6- 59561.4

59531.4 200 WEST59809-3 -59G7B.D -59820.5 - S9S09.0 -60813-0 -

- 59317.6 -58689-3 -

' 59140.5 '' 59955.4

59933.8 J59579.8 J

59023.4 *59346-9 -58672-4

' 59010.8 -

59063.6 -59070.1 -59284-1 -58859.7 - 59041.659314.9 J

50837.560319.8 61005.8 100 WEST60494-760173.150349-6

' 59847.0 060100-7 68617.069886-6 50838.0 100 EPST59BS1-4

59754-159827-8 59956.4 200 EflST59544.059745-0BQ47B.6 59542.4 300 ERST

59436.258974.2

- 58971-359131.3

59292-5- 56705-4 -

58782.358966.159194-8 -535Q9.0 - 58030-959691 -660497.560651-8 57241-558933.456715-6 -58968.0 -

591S2.559938-3ED749.4 -81811.8 - 00030-3 '53601.2 -58949-6 -

- 59364-459258.053301-9

' 59249-5 59236.959210.1 -59485.259317.7

80602.7 '59691-659375-759004-0 59458-1 -

5928S.Q -

57630-0 -59169.0 -

59254-1 -

- 58027-4 58665-0 400 ERST58978.256382.456719.2 58972.3 500 EflST59030.258973-959083.7 59289.0 600 EflST59493.259456.559409-0 53413-4 700 EflST

59037.8

59123-458637-7 59231- S B OQ E fiST

60735-0 -1- 59299-2

E13Q8.5BIS27.200302.1 900 EflSTS1896.259275-2

59919-53H133.7 1000 EflST

56564.059153.2

g.16231

o O

o

o o

o

o o

o

o o

o

D D

o

O O

o

o o

oH

Oo

o

sffi^

0 100 200

metres

Lac des Iles Claim GroupTOTAL FIELD MAGNETICS

Scale 1:5,000Line posting

Data in gammasR.H. Sutcliffe May 1995

S2H04NE0023 2 16231 LAC DES ISLES 240

o o

o 73

CD o oz o 73

CO o O

O

-HIE

O O Q

O

-HI

fO I-*Oo2: o

o o

Q 73

fS) UP oQ

O

—l:r

roCDO

o 73

800 WEST 2-20-1-22--22-

700 WEST . 18 .-16--16--12-

600 WEST .6 .-8 -o -4

500 WEST 4 .0 --6-28-

400 WEST . 30 .-24-16--6 -

300 WEST . 12 .-10-4 --8 -

200 WEST .4 .-4 --2 --z -

100 WEST . 6 .-18--12--12-

0 -10-- -- ————————— •"•"-"•i "*Uil ." '"'•"•'"" 1. 1 IMIfl i

-e --10-

100 EfiST .g .0 -

-2 08 -28n6 -28

- 10 -287 -26

- 3 -22-18 -22

•9 -8 -•9 -4 -•10 -4 -

7 0 -•10 -6 --32--22 4-26 0

. -Q -25-0 -38-4 -24-3 -161 -14-

- 2 - 14-i -10-3 -40 Q3 -6 --l -8 ^1 -4 -1-30 -4 --35 -6 --15 -2

- -6 -8-5 -16-

•" -? ' -T2J-4 -10J-l -6 -3 -10--3 -12

-4 J

-2 -10- -8 -20

2 -144 -128 -16

' 12 -348 -202 -18-Z -18-2 -100 -4

- 2 -S0 -2-12 0-50 6

- -26 -4-12 -24-7 -20-5 -8

- -8 - 3-6 -10-s -e-5 -2

- -6 -8-7 20 4-7 2-3 - 2-2 -2

- -16 4- -18 0•'-11 '-14-

-9 -10-7 -6-3 -8-4 -6

L 4 44

200 ERST .4-2 -46 -

300 ERST 8 .084

400 EflST .4 .-8-2 1

r 5 -2- 18 0

20 6- 18 8•3 4 -•-40-- -12 -4- -20 -4

-12 -4-10 Z

6500 ERST 1 0 .

10 -0 --2 -

BOO ERST -z .-3 -

-3 -2 --10 -2-3 4-5 0-5 4-20 -2

- -3Q -6- -18 -6

-12 0-15 0

. -7 -4- -4 0

-5 D-5 2

- -3 -2-6 -2

- -24 0- -28 -4

-15 -8-8 -8-5 -10

. -7 -4- -5 -2

-4 2-5 2-3 100 6-14 0-8 -4-2 2

- -2 -8- 0 -81 '^'53 -r ij

-16 0-14 -2-5 2-5 0-6 142 6-12 4

- -5 18-5 8-4 60 6Z 2-20 4-14 2

- -2 2-2 20 5

•0 100 82 B -0 2 --3 6 --1 -21 B

4 -4

700 EflST 2 .2 -

-6-5-5

- -6-4

- -5- -5- -li

-10 -2-6 -12-8 -10--5 -10-7 -8-S -10

- -3 -12- -5 2

-e 12- -15 4

-20 12-li 10-15 H-12 e -

. 0 100 42 iu0 81 6-4 Z-6 4-5 -6-4 0-2 -2-4 -6

p~-Ky -B-15 -6-6 12-7 40 -61 40 8-7 G2 -4

- -20-6-13-12-S 0-26-2 10-1 10

- -3 8-2 4 -Q 2-2 60 6 --1 40 4 -0 4-1 2-3 0-3 2 -

6 -.

800 EflST'

-5-5-13-12-18-8 8-3 102 4

- 6 42 2

- 8 26 66 45 B0 10

- -11 6- -E 2

-5 2-5 -4

- -7 Z-12 -9-18 0-15 -2

- -15 -2- -9 -2

-7 26-S 10-a B0 8

- -5 0-4 6-2 0-1 20 4

20042

3 4-3 4-10 4-5 B-12 B-14 4-12 4 --8 6 '-6 6 --5 8-5 9-4 80 10-4 12 --1 18 --l 1 4 -

18 -12

900 EflST

IQOO ERST

f 1 4- 13

64Q 02 20 10-4 8-4 8

- -6 4-14 2

- -i D Q. - 14 4- -10 6

-6 14-6 14-6 10-4 16-7 18

- -8 14-ST 2010 169 10

- 3 65 4

- 2 4- o 10. - t 2- 1 -10- 3 4

2 62 2-3 -48

. -S2 6

•3 8Z 4

•2 e2 12-7 8 --6 12-38--Z 10-3 12-3 12D 81 50 6 -3 8 -2 80 8

-

-

- -e-8-11-10

- -7- -6

-5. -2 '

0 01 4Z 64 2

- 8 10- 8 12

6 10- 20 20' 4 20' 6 10- 12 22

4 12- 3 17- 6 10

7 18- 10 12

14 2- 3 6

13 42 -2

•10 10

10- 0 8

2 100 12

' 2 123 123 101 14 --2 10 --6 8-4 4-5 4-5 Q --6 -4-6 -6 --9 -4 --5 2 -0 4 -

4 J-

-30-38-Z4-8-12

- -7- -6

2e-3

1 -5-4-3-4

1 -40-5-4-2

- 2

oi

-3-40-8-3-4-5-6-10-10-12-18-15-16-12-10-20

00

O70-1

CO 0 0

O

CO O 0

OTO

MO O 0

O70

K)"— 0 0

OTD

ro ro o o

O TD

IS) OJ O O

oTO

W

O O

O TD

800 WEST

700 WEST

600 WEST

500 WEST

400 WEST

300 WEST

200 WEST

100 WEST

0

100 ERST

200 ERST

300 ERST

400 ERST

500 EflST

600 EflST

700 EflST

800 EflST

900 EBST

1000 ERSTg. 16231

\Direction \ gi ^

0 Id

9^Surrey line 1200

) 200——————— i

Lac des Iles Claim Group VLF-E1 SURVEY

Seattle (NLK) 18.6 kHz Scale 1:5,000

Line posting R.H. Sutcliffe May 1995

52H04NE0023 2 16231 LAC DES ISLES 250

oQ

Q 75

CO oQ

O 73

CO O O

o-H:r

O O O

O 73

O Q

-Hx

OO

o73

Oi oQ

o o

o 73

BOO WEST

700 WEST

600 WEST

500 WEST

400 WEST

300 WEST

200 WEST

100 WEST

Q

100 ERST

200 ERST

300 ERST

400 ERST

500 EflST

BOO ERST

700 EflST

800 ERST

900 ERST

1000 ERST

\ .ll

}

-J o o

o"Hx.

COo o

o

ta o O

o-H m

ro o o o

o3JH T.

o o

o .•^J-l

IT t'li

roo o

o

•h

N)0) O O

o20

•i

i

M-t*. o0•z. 0

800 WEST

700 WEST

600 WEST

500 WEST

400 WEST

300 WEST

200 WEST

100 WEST

O

100 ERST

200 ERST

300 EflST

400 EflST

500 ERST

600 EflST

700 ERST

800 ERST

900 ERST

1000 ERST^•16231

SMttle Channel 1

Direction ofreading*

Survey lin* 120

100uuiu mctrot.

200

Lac des Iles Claim Groep VLF-E1 SURVEY

Seattle (NIK) 1 8.6 kHz Scale 1:5,000

In-Pbue Qudratm

52H04NE0023 2 16231 LAC DES ISLES 260

t—*-JD0

ZQ33H

i— 'eaOo

Za33H

i—*tt)Oa•z.QTDH

N)a0o•z.a70-H

IS)i-*Do

Za33•H

NJroOCD

za33•H

poUioo

za33—l

TO.b.OaZa3DH

800 WEST

700 HEST

GOO WEST

500 WEST

400 WEST

300 WEST

2DO WEST

IDD WEST

O

100 ERST

200 ERST

300 ERST

400 ERST

500 ERST

600 ERST

700 ER5T

800 ER3T

900 ER8-

1000 ER3T

Q O

Q 3J

CO Q o

UJ O o

Zo

ro O O

ZO33

M I-*O o

o 3J

ro MOoZ o 33

O) O o

ZO

ro4* O o

800 NEST

700 WEST

600 WEST

500 WEST

400 WEST

300 WEST

20Q WEST

IDQ WEST

100 EflST

200 ERST

300 ERST

400 ERST

500 ERST

BOO ERST

700 ERST

800 ERST

900 ER3T

1000 ERST

Survey line 120*

BueUa*030*

2. 1 6231

VLF-EM SURVEYAnnapolis (NSS)21.4kHz

Fraser Filtered In-Phase Data (Filter Up) Scale 1:5,000

In-Phase Contour Interval 5%

R.H. Sutcliffe May 1995

52H04NE0023 2 16231 LAC DES ISLES 270

-J o ozQ 7)

CDOa

a 73

CD o O

o—i ir

r-o OoQ

M l— O O

Q

-H 1C

fO

O O

rv)ooz o

ro

o

o 73

800 WEST

700 WEST

600 WEST

500 WEST

400 WEST

300 WEST

200 WEST

100 WEST

100 EflST

200 ERST

300 EflST

100 EflST

500 EflST

EflST

700 EflST

dOQ EflST

900 EflST

IQOQ EflST

-8 --10'-12-10-10-8 --4 --6 '-4 '20-2 --10--20--18-12-6 --6 --6 '-E --Z '-6 --6 '-E --8 --6 -

.1

-e --8 --4 --2 '-4 -

.T"4

-4 --2 -~*-2 -

t-i.

cCJc.-

35 -I6i6 -165 -104 -12

- 5 -102 Q5 4 -3 02 2-3 -4 -1 -20 -48 -425 -429 -18

- 16 -168 -12

•4 -8 --1 -6 --2 - 10-3 -4 -

- -4 -2-4 -2-4 -6 '-4 -6-4 -5 -

•-24'-5 6 --2 4-4 -6

- -5 -4er e-0 -B

-e -e-8 -2 --9 -2

l -e 4-8

-82 -624 '860-2-4

-* t-J C 3 C3 Cz ;3 C 0 ^ Hn. r

-14-7 -10

- 4 -124 -104 -6

- 0 -8- -2 -7

1 -4-2 -2-4 -4 --2 -2-5 -4 --4 -2 -

. -4 -3 .3 -4 -16 -27 -e -1 -16--3 -6-4 -2-9 -4

- -7 -2-7 -4-10 -4-8 -8-11 -4-7 4 -16 12 -8 S -4 10-17 7-18 4-ZD -4-17 -4-18 -2-15 -2 -

[ -12 -2 '1-22

4-6

-3 -321 425 617 10-1 4-2 12

' -12 0' -25 -6- -15 -5

*- -18 -510742-2-4-4

-* *-o aD C3 C z 23 CO 5

c a

-44 -5-1 -4

•-40-50-12 0 --21 0-27 -3-23 4 --18 4-13 4 --12 2-10 D-8 D-12 2-6 -2-7 -2-4 0 --7 -2 -

- -5 -2 --5 -4 --8 -5-B -6

•-80--7 Q-4 -4 '5 14 '18 223 12-3 8D B

- - 2 4•-60

-"^7 7de. c.-27 -6-22 -8-18 0-8 02 18-2 2-12 -4-IB 10-5 6-2 4.2 4-3 4-18 2

. -20 Q- -9 -4- -7 -6' -5 -2

30 1228 820 217 0

- 2 0l -S

- -i e4Q-2-2

•* h3 C i C3 Cz z3 C0 P

t q

-7-4-3

- -4-5-5

' -13-16-16 -4 -t

- -15 -10--13 -6 --12 -6 --11 -10--7 -S --10 -2 --8 5 '-6 19 '-7 10 --8 8 --10 6 --12 10 --11 7 '

- -10 6 '•-26

2 IB -6 12 -8 10 -0 6-5 0 --110 --15 D-15 -4-16 -5-17 -9-26 0 --33 4-18 0-8 -61 2-4 4-11-2

- S -42-3-14-14-17

- -13 -S1 -13 -2- -8 10' 9 6- 19 2

13 212 -24 44 4-Z 00 2

•o a-2 2 --5 -2

1 -6 02 -

3 h3 i- i CJ Cz s3 CD 3 HP a

-8-9-12-11-14-12 12 --8 123 1010 26 2 '6 2 -7 2 -7 211 106 12-4 6-4 B-3 0 '-10 -4-i s nX w U

-16 -6 --19 -6 --20 -S-16 -8-19 -8

1 IQ 1r — ""-1-Q- ~

-IS 4 -4 e4 5-8 23 -2

•8 -4 -8 0

- 1 -2-4 --8-6t 12 1

8 26 0

- 5 4' 2 4. -3 6

-8 5-8 2-8 4-4 4-6 B-B B-6 S

- -5 8-8 12-8 12-10 12

84

i rr-5 C5 C: 33 CD Z

C -

2D- 20

18' 14

6 8 -2 0 -0 12 '-2 8. -

•-76-10 4-12 -2

- -IB -2 -- -16 4 -

-16 12 '-is e-15 8 -

- -12 6 --13 12-12 8-12 8 -. -j —^^ "it24 12 -21 Q -15 214 415 214 010 -412 0

•5 65 00 -6 -8 -12-

' 1084 141 142 10

•e e1 10-5 10 --4 10 '-3 10

- -3 10- -3 14. -4 10•-58-76

- -8 4 -^-82--90'

' -15 -4

o r*o cD CD C z z3 C D 5

c z

-e- -13- -13

-13-11-12-7-8-2 -2 i2 2-1 2 -4 48 6 -6 108 1215 8j, . ,..

Hjgf ' s ft W

IB M" (10 128 203 88 1010 1214 6 -4 613 10 -12 410 7-11

1215 16li 16

•5 145 143 14l 140 10-4 10 '-10 6

•-94•-90- -10 -2- -12 -6

-15 -8-15 -8 --19 -2 '-22 -2 -

0 J

o ^0 -t 3 C3 C

r s3 C 0 3c: a

BOO WEST

700 WEST

BOO WEST

500 WEST

400 WEST

300 WEST

200 WEST-32-24-18-12 100 WEST-12-8

- -4-6 0-5 ,

' -t-2-3 100 ERST-3-30o 200 EflST2-2-3-3 300 EflST

05 400 EflST

- 4D-4-3 500 EflST-a-11-12-14 600 ERST

- -15-17-18-19 7QQ EflST-18-15-li-l 800 ERST6

900 EflST

1000 EflST

^ Snrvcylln* 120* .^\f

^ BMftUneOSO* ^if\ l}3 Dinction f *^

ofrmullogi 1

\ 4 cXZSSiC. 0 100 200

metre*

2. 16231

Lac des Iles Claim Group

Annapolis (NSS) 2 1.4 kHzScale 1:5,000

Line posting R.H. SutcliffeQuadrature (*) j Ia-PliMe(M) May 1995

52H04NE0023 2 16231 LAC DES ISLES 280

D Q

Z O 73

CDO Q

O 73

CO O O

O

ro OoQ

o 73

Oo

Q 7)

ro MO Q

O 73

(Jl Oo

o 73

ro Js. o o

o 73

aoo WEST

700 NEST

600 WEST

500 WEST

400 NEST

300 WEST

200 WEST

100 WEST

O

100 ERST

200 ERST

300 ERST

400 ERST

500 EflST

BOO ERST

700 EflST

800 EflST

900 EflST

LOGO ERST

)

; j i \\

800 WEST

700 WEST

GOO WEST

500 WEST

400 WEST

3QQ WEST

200 WEST

100 WEST

O

100 ERST

200 EflST

300 EflST

400 EflST

500 EflST

600 EflST

700 EflST

800 EflST

900 EflST

1000 ERST. 16231

o O

O

t-*CO0Oz o-1re

i-* (Ooo

o-\TT

K)0oO30-1rr

N)DO

O•H :r

roPOoo3OHrr

IX)

oozo-H:r

MQ03OH•JL

Surrey line 120*

Baseline 030*

Direction f offMdingi j

LS#Sf

^ ——————

\tf

^/AimepoUt ^Clwiuell

0 100 200"""""""""""H fflZties

Lac des Iles (VLF^EM

Claim GroiapSURVEY

Annapolis (NSS) 21 .4 kHzScale 1

Line profiles imm-JH-50H OH +50H

—— In-Plus* — — Qvadntnre

1:5,000

R.H. SutcliffeMay 1995

52H04NE0023 2 16231 LAC DES ISLES 290

ro roo o

oQ

O Q

O O

D Q

O O

O O

O O

O CDOQO O

800 WEST

700 WEST

800 WEST

500 WEST

400 WE5T

300 WEST

200 WEST

100 WEST

100 ERST

200 ERST

300 ERST

400 ERST

500 ERST

BOO ERST

700 EflST

800 EflST

900 ERST

1000 EflST

\

d

i

•;J(.

fi

V

(

800 WEST

700 WEST

BOO WEST

500 WEST

400 WEST

300 WEST

200 WEST

100 WEST

100 EflST

200 EflST

300 ERST

400 EflST

500 EflST

600 EflST

700 EflST

800 EflST

900 EflST

1000 ERST16231

S2H04NE0023 2 16231 LAC DES ISLES 300

Oo

oHZT

Oo

Q .-3D

Oo

Q 30

Oo

QTD

Oo

Q 3)

Oo

Q ."33

Oo

Q 33

ao

Q 50

200

metres

ies Iles Claim Group TOTAL FIELD MAGNETIC

Scale 1:5,000Line pro files

l mm s 1,000 gamius490SO 59050 69450

H gammas

R.H. Sutcliffe May 1995