gp2020 road network planning - california

34
County of San Diego County of San Diego Department of Planning and Land Use Department of Planning and Land Use June 25, 2005 June 25, 2005 GP2020 GP2020 Road Network Planning Road Network Planning Steering Committee Steering Committee

Upload: others

Post on 03-Feb-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: GP2020 Road Network Planning - California

County of San DiegoCounty of San DiegoDepartment of Planning and Land UseDepartment of Planning and Land UseJune 25, 2005June 25, 2005

GP2020GP2020Road Network PlanningRoad Network Planning

Steering CommitteeSteering Committee

Page 2: GP2020 Road Network Planning - California

ROAD NETWORK PLANNINGROAD NETWORK PLANNING

July ‘04July ‘04•• Staff Presents Traffic ForecastsStaff Presents Traffic Forecasts•• Board of Supervisors endorse Residential Board of Supervisors endorse Residential Baseline & Board AlternativeBaseline & Board Alternative

June ‘05June ‘05•• Commercial/Industrial Use: Board of Commercial/Industrial Use: Board of Supervisors endorse Draft Land Use & Supervisors endorse Draft Land Use & Board AlternativeBoard Alternative

May/July May/July KICKOFF: Road Network Planning KICKOFF: Road Network Planning •• Backcountry (May)Backcountry (May)•• East & North County (July)East & North County (July)

OnOn--GoingGoing Environmental Impact ReportEnvironmental Impact Report

Page 3: GP2020 Road Network Planning - California

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200

Lane Miles @ LOS E/F

Base Year 2000

December 2002Working Copy Map

Existing General Plan

MAY 2004 FORECASTSMAY 2004 FORECASTS

GP2020

Base Year 2000

Existing General Plan

Lane Miles @ Lane Miles @ LOS E/FLOS E/F

Page 4: GP2020 Road Network Planning - California

$0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000

$ Millions

Base Year 2000

Dec '02 WorkingCopy Map

Existing GeneralPlan

MAY 2004 FORECASTSMAY 2004 FORECASTS

$0.57 Billion

$2.3 Billion

$7.7 Billion

Road Road Improvement Improvement

Cost EstimatesCost Estimates

Page 5: GP2020 Road Network Planning - California

ROAD NETWORK PLANNINGROAD NETWORK PLANNING

TODAY’S TODAY’S AGENDAAGENDA

STAFF PRESENTATIONSTAFF PRESENTATION–– OverviewOverview–– Community Review ProcessCommunity Review Process–– Community IssuesCommunity Issues–– Next StepsNext Steps

ROAD CLASSIFICATIONSROAD CLASSIFICATIONS

Page 6: GP2020 Road Network Planning - California

OVERVIEWOVERVIEW

ROAD NETWORK PLANNINGROAD NETWORK PLANNING

Page 7: GP2020 Road Network Planning - California

OVERVIEWOVERVIEW

State Requirement: State Requirement: Balance Land Use Balance Land Use and Circulation and Circulation PlansPlans

Page 8: GP2020 Road Network Planning - California

CE ROAD NETWORKCE ROAD NETWORK

Circulation Circulation ElementElement(Regional Roads)(Regional Roads)

•• Regional backbone of road Regional backbone of road systemsystem

•• Provide for vehicular Provide for vehicular movement between movement between communitiescommunities

NonNon--Circulation Circulation ElementElement(Local Roads)(Local Roads)

Feed traffic into the CE road Feed traffic into the CE road system and provide access system and provide access to residential and to residential and commercial areascommercial areas

Privately constructed and Privately constructed and maintained roads providing maintained roads providing access to private property access to private property

Private RoadsPrivate Roads

Page 9: GP2020 Road Network Planning - California

PLANNING ISSUESPLANNING ISSUES

•• AFFECTS: AFFECTS: –– MobilityMobility–– TimeTime–– ExperienceExperience

•• SOLUTIONS: SOLUTIONS: –– Revise road classificationRevise road classification–– Add new roads to the Add new roads to the

networknetwork

ROAD CAPACITY

Page 10: GP2020 Road Network Planning - California

PLANNING ISSUESPLANNING ISSUES

Create a connected Create a connected network of roads that network of roads that links together different links together different communities, and that communities, and that connects important connects important areas within each areas within each community.community.

CONNECTIVITY

Page 11: GP2020 Road Network Planning - California

PLANNING ISSUESPLANNING ISSUES

•• Select road Select road classifications classifications appropriate for the appropriate for the location (rural, semilocation (rural, semi--rural, village)rural, village)

•• Select road type Select road type appropriate for local appropriate for local topography, planned topography, planned land use.land use.

APPROPRIATE LOCATION

Page 12: GP2020 Road Network Planning - California

PLANNING ISSUESPLANNING ISSUES

•• Improve pedestrian Improve pedestrian and/or bicycle network and/or bicycle network

•• Review road Review road classificationclassification

•• Provide secondary Provide secondary egress in fireegress in fire--prone prone areasareas

MULTI-MODAL

Page 13: GP2020 Road Network Planning - California

PLANNING ISSUESPLANNING ISSUES

•• Widening a road, or Widening a road, or building a new road, building a new road, may create impacts that may create impacts that cannot be mitigated.cannot be mitigated.

•• Building roads in highly Building roads in highly constrained areas is constrained areas is expensive.expensive.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

MINIMIZE COSTS

Page 14: GP2020 Road Network Planning - California

ROAD NETWORK PLANNINGROAD NETWORK PLANNING

GP2020 ProcessGP2020 Process•• Circulation Network (roads and related Circulation Network (roads and related

bicycle & trail networks)bicycle & trail networks)•• Circulation Element policiesCirculation Element policies

CIP CIP ProcessProcess•• Implements General PlanImplements General Plan•• Programs road construction projects Programs road construction projects

through process administered by DPWthrough process administered by DPW•• DPW update in progress DPW update in progress

Page 15: GP2020 Road Network Planning - California

COMMUNITY REVIEW COMMUNITY REVIEW PROCESSPROCESS

ROAD NETWORK PLANNINGROAD NETWORK PLANNING

Page 16: GP2020 Road Network Planning - California

COMMUNITY REVIEW PROCESSCOMMUNITY REVIEW PROCESS

Community Community WorkshopsWorkshops

Staff Staff RecommendationRecommendation

Board Selects Board Selects Preferred Preferred

AlternativeAlternative

Define Road Define Road ClassificationsClassifications

Develop & Test

Countywide Alternatives

Road Design Manual

PHASE IPHASE I PHASE 2PHASE 2 PHASE 3PHASE 3

Develop & Refine Draft Road NetworkDevelop & Refine Draft Road Network

Page 17: GP2020 Road Network Planning - California

COMMUNITY REVIEW: PHASE 1COMMUNITY REVIEW: PHASE 1

Preliminary Preliminary AlternativesAlternatives

Draft Land Draft Land Use Map:Use Map:June 2005June 2005

Board Board Alternative:Alternative:June 2005June 2005

COMMUNITY COMMUNITY WORKSHOPS: WORKSHOPS:

Community Community PreferencesPreferences

BOS BOS HearingHearing

(May 2005)(May 2005)

Traffic Model Forecasts

Page 18: GP2020 Road Network Planning - California

COMMUNITY REVIEW: PHASE 1COMMUNITY REVIEW: PHASE 1

KICKOFF MEETINGS:KICKOFF MEETINGS:•• Traffic Model Results (LOS)Traffic Model Results (LOS)•• Existing Road NetworksExisting Road Networks•• Road Network “Toolbox”Road Network “Toolbox”•• Mapping CriteriaMapping Criteria•• Mapping OptionsMapping Options•• Community PreferencesCommunity Preferences

WORKSHOPS:WORKSHOPS: Alternative SolutionsAlternative Solutions

Page 19: GP2020 Road Network Planning - California

TRAFFIC MODEL RESULTSTRAFFIC MODEL RESULTS

DRAFT LAND DRAFT LAND USE MAPUSE MAP

Level of Service Level of Service ForecastsForecasts

Page 20: GP2020 Road Network Planning - California

Level of ServiceLevel of Service DescriptionDescription

AABB

•• Free flow (or reasonably free flow) Free flow (or reasonably free flow) operations operations —— vehicles are almost vehicles are almost completely unimpededcompletely unimpeded

CC

DD

•• Flow with speeds at or near free flowFlow with speeds at or near free flow•• Freedom to maneuver is noticeably Freedom to maneuver is noticeably

restrictedrestricted, and lane , and lane changes require changes require more care and vigilancemore care and vigilance

•• Speeds decline with increasing flowsSpeeds decline with increasing flows•• Freedom to maneuver is limitedFreedom to maneuver is limited•• Reduced physical / psychological Reduced physical / psychological

comfort levelscomfort levels

TRAFFIC MODEL RESULTSTRAFFIC MODEL RESULTS

Page 21: GP2020 Road Network Planning - California

Level of ServiceLevel of Service DescriptionDescription

EE•• Operations at capacity Operations at capacity —— the the

highest density value highest density value •• No usable gaps in traffic stream. No usable gaps in traffic stream. •• No ability to dissipate minor traffic No ability to dissipate minor traffic

disruptionsdisruptions

FF

•• Breakdowns in vehicular flow, with Breakdowns in vehicular flow, with queues forming behind breakdown queues forming behind breakdown pointspoints

•• Primary causes: traffic incidents, Primary causes: traffic incidents, merges, and lane dropsmerges, and lane drops

TRAFFIC MODEL RESULTSTRAFFIC MODEL RESULTS

Page 22: GP2020 Road Network Planning - California

TRAFFIC MODEL RESULTSTRAFFIC MODEL RESULTS

Level of Service Forecasts

Page 23: GP2020 Road Network Planning - California

EXISTING ROAD NETWORKEXISTING ROAD NETWORK

•• INSERT SAMPLE COMMUNITY MAP OF INSERT SAMPLE COMMUNITY MAP OF CE & CIP NETWORKCE & CIP NETWORK

CIP Network: NumbersCIP Network: NumbersCE Network: Color CodedCE Network: Color Coded

Page 24: GP2020 Road Network Planning - California

EXISTING ROAD NETWORKEXISTING ROAD NETWORK

Alpine Sample: Road SegmentAlpine Sample: Road Segment ClassificationClassification Existing ConditionsExisting Conditions

Alpine BoulevardAlpine BoulevardTavern to West VictoriaTavern to West Victoria

CollectorCollector4 Lanes4 Lanes

2 Lanes2 LanesContinuous left Continuous left turn laneturn lane

Alpine BoulevardAlpine BoulevardII--8/Dunbar Lane 8/Dunbar Lane interchange to Arnold Wayinterchange to Arnold Way

MajorMajor4 Lanes + Median4 Lanes + Median

2 Lanes2 Lanes•• Continuous left Continuous left

turn laneturn lane•• 44--ft Shoulderft Shoulder

Arnold WayArnold WayTavern to Alpine BlvdTavern to Alpine Blvd

CollectorCollector4 Lanes4 Lanes

2 Lanes2 Lanes•• Intermittent Intermittent

parking laneparking lane•• 44--ft Shoulderft Shoulder

Alpine BoulevardAlpine BoulevardWest Victoria to South West Victoria to South GradeGrade

CollectorCollector4 Lanes4 Lanes

2 Lanes2 Lanes•• Continuous left Continuous left

turn laneturn lane•• 44--ft Shoulderft Shoulder

Page 25: GP2020 Road Network Planning - California

ROAD NETWORK ROAD NETWORK ““TOOL BOXTOOL BOX””

•• Existing & Proposed CE Road Existing & Proposed CE Road Classifications Classifications —— Under review by Under review by DPLU, DPW and Steering CommitteeDPLU, DPW and Steering Committee

•• Community preferences will Community preferences will be identified later be identified later —— Road Road classifications,classifications, regional bike & trail regional bike & trail networksnetworks

GOAL:GOAL:Appropriate tools for different locationsAppropriate tools for different locations

Page 26: GP2020 Road Network Planning - California

ADDRESS:ADDRESS:•• Road capacity (LOS D or better)Road capacity (LOS D or better)•• Road design / connectivityRoad design / connectivity•• Environmental impactsEnvironmental impacts•• Appropriate location (function, land Appropriate location (function, land

use, community character)use, community character)•• Community consensusCommunity consensus

SEE HANDOUTSEE HANDOUT

MAPPING CRITERIAMAPPING CRITERIA

Page 27: GP2020 Road Network Planning - California

COMMUNITY PREFERENCESCOMMUNITY PREFERENCES

Established earlier in GP2020 process.Established earlier in GP2020 process.Alpine example:Alpine example:

•• Change Alpine Blvd to Town Collector (three Change Alpine Blvd to Town Collector (three lanes to preserve trees lanes to preserve trees ––Tavern to South Tavern to South Grade)Grade)

•• Change Tavern Road to Town CollectorChange Tavern Road to Town Collector

•• Change Arnold WayChange Arnold Way

•• Extend Alpine Heights Blvd. to Harbison Extend Alpine Heights Blvd. to Harbison Canyon Road as Secondary AccessCanyon Road as Secondary Access

Page 28: GP2020 Road Network Planning - California

NEXT STEPSNEXT STEPS

ROAD NETWORK PLANNINGROAD NETWORK PLANNING

Page 29: GP2020 Road Network Planning - California

•• Opportunity to Revise PrioritiesOpportunity to Revise Priorities•• Address Capacity IssuesAddress Capacity Issues•• Road Network AlternativesRoad Network Alternatives•• Community Input/PreferencesCommunity Input/Preferences

COMMUNITY WORKSHOPSCOMMUNITY WORKSHOPS

Page 30: GP2020 Road Network Planning - California

MAPPING OPTIONSMAPPING OPTIONS

•• Expand Capacity Expand Capacity •• Construct New RoadsConstruct New Roads•• Reduce Future CapacityReduce Future Capacity•• Remove Roads from CE NetworkRemove Roads from CE Network

In certain circumstances:In certain circumstances:•• Reduce Land Use IntensityReduce Land Use Intensity•• Accept Lower LOSAccept Lower LOS

Page 31: GP2020 Road Network Planning - California

MAPPING OPTIONSMAPPING OPTIONS

Page 32: GP2020 Road Network Planning - California

Backcountry Workshops:

Ongoing

COMMUNITY WORKSHOPSCOMMUNITY WORKSHOPS

East County Workshops:

August

North County Workshops: September

Page 33: GP2020 Road Network Planning - California

COMMUNITY WORKSHOPSCOMMUNITY WORKSHOPS

PHASE 1PHASE 1

Community Community Meetings and Meetings and WorkshopsWorkshops

Develop and Develop and TEST TEST Alternatives Alternatives with with Calibrated Calibrated ModelModel

Page 34: GP2020 Road Network Planning - California

AVAILABLE INFORMATIONAVAILABLE INFORMATION

Handouts:Handouts:Mapping CriteriaMapping CriteriaDraft “Toolbox” Draft “Toolbox” for CE Roadsfor CE Roads

Sample Maps: Sample Maps: CE and CIP CE and CIP NetworksNetworksTraffic Model Traffic Model Forecasts (LOS Forecasts (LOS Maps)Maps)