global lei data quality report | october 2017

1
Statistics Data Quality Scores Global LEI Data Quality Report | October 2017 LEI Total Data Quality Score LEI Total Data Quality Score Trend The LEI Total Data Quality Score is calculated as the equal weighted average of the 7 ’Data Quality Criteria‘ listed below. Totals Values Total issued LEIs Countries LEI Issuers Progress achieved with regard to the continuous optimization of the data quality based on the LEI Total Data Quality Score. Data Quality Criteria The Data Quality criteria is expected to contain 12 dimensions. Currently a subset of 7 criteria is implemented, to the detriment of the score, as they are averaged on all of them. This is expected to change, on a nonfixed timeline, to include all 12 dimensions. Accuracy Completeness Comprehensiveness Integrity Representation Uniqueness Validity Lorem Ipsum Lorem Ipsum Lorem 100.00 % 98.74 % 99.99 % 99.92 % 99.99 % 100.00 % 99.90 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 99.89 % 100.00 % 99.15 % 100.00 % 99.99 % 99.99 % 99.89 % 99.89 % 99.89 % 99.89 % 99.89 % 99.89 % 100.00 % 99.28 % 100.00 % 99.91 % 99.99 % 100.00 % 99.86 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100.00 % 91.33 % 100.00 % 99.90 % 99.99 % 100.00 % 98.12 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % Quality Maturity Level Oct Sep Aug 31-Oct-16 688,346 207 30 100% 75% Oct Sep Aug 99.84 % 99.79 % 99.86 % 99 % DISCLAIMER: All figures of this Global LEI Data Quality Report are derived from these sources: 1) Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF) Concatenated end-of-month files for all months mentioned in this report and 2) Data Quality Reports for all aforementioned concatenated files based on the LEI-Data-Quality-Check Specification v1.5. While every care has been taken in the compilation of this information, GLEIF will not be held responsible for any loss, damage or inconvenience caused as a result of inaccuracy or error within the Global LEI Data Quality Report. The text and graphic content of the Global LEI Data Quality Report may be used, printed and distributed ONLY with the copyright information displayed (© Copyright Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF)). Average maturity level: 0.99 New issued LEIs 99,359 Values 29,428 LEI Activity 8,724 Renewed LEIs Reactivated LEIs 6,725 New lapsed LEIs 100.00 % Top 5 Best Performing LEI Issuers Data Quality Score 100.00 % 100.00 % 100.00 % 100.00 % 100% 0% Bloomberg Finance LP LEI issuers achieving maturity level 3 LEI issuers achieving maturity level 2 LEI issuers achieving maturity level 1 L3 Excellent quality L2 Expected quality L1 Required quality INFOCAMERE - SOCIETA' CONSORTILE DI INFORMATICA DELL... Krajowy Depozyt Papierów Wartościowych S.A. (KDPW) Centrální Depozitář Cenných Papírů, a.s. (CSD Prague... GS1 Germany GmbH 19/30 (63%) 16/30 (53%) 13/30 (43%) Summary Top 5 Countries – Data Quality Score China, Isle Of Man, Lithuania, Malaysia, Nigeria

Upload: others

Post on 08-Dec-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Statistics

Data Quality Scores

Global LEI Data Quality Report | October 2017

LEI Total Data Quality Score LEI Total Data Quality Score TrendThe LEI Total Data Quality Score is calculated as the equal weightedaverage of the 7 ’Data Quality Criteria‘ listed below.

Totals Values

Total issued LEIs

Countries

LEI Issuers

Progress achieved with regard to the continuous optimization of the dataquality based on the LEI Total Data Quality Score.

Data Quality Criteria

The Data Quality criteria is expected to contain 12 dimensions. Currently a subset of 7criteria is implemented, to the detriment of the score, as they are averaged on all ofthem. This is expected to change, on a nonfixed timeline, to include all 12 dimensions.

Accuracy

Completeness

Comprehensiveness

Integrity

Representation

Uniqueness

Validity

Lorem

Ipsum

Lorem

Ipsum

Lorem

100.00 %

98.74 %

99.99 %

99.92 %

99.99 %

100.00 %

99.90 %

100 %

100 %

100 %

100 %

100 %

99.89 %

100.00 %

99.15 %

100.00 %

99.99 %

99.99 %

99.89 %

99.89 %

99.89 %

99.89 %

99.89 %

99.89 %

100.00 %

99.28 %

100.00 %

99.91 %

99.99 %

100.00 %

99.86 %

100 %

100 %

100 %

100 %

100 %

100.00 %

91.33 %

100.00 %

99.90 %

99.99 %

100.00 %

98.12 %

100 %

100 %

100 %

100 %

100 %

Quality Maturity Level

Oct Sep Aug 31-Oct-16

688,346

207

30

100%

75%

OctSepAug

99.84 % 99.79 %99.86 %

99 %

DISCLAIMER: All figures of this Global LEI Data Quality Report are derived from these sources: 1) Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF) Concatenated end-of-month files for all monthsmentioned in this report and 2) Data Quality Reports for all aforementioned concatenated files based on the LEI-Data-Quality-Check Specification v1.5. While every care has been taken in thecompilation of this information, GLEIF will not be held responsible for any loss, damage or inconvenience caused as a result of inaccuracy or error within the Global LEI Data Quality Report. The textand graphic content of the Global LEI Data Quality Report may be used, printed and distributed ONLY with the copyright information displayed (© Copyright Global Legal Entity IdentifierFoundation (GLEIF)).

Average maturity level: 0.99

New issued LEIs 99,359

Values

29,428

LEI Activity

8,724

Renewed LEIs

Reactivated LEIs

6,725New lapsed LEIs

100.00 %

Top 5 Best PerformingLEI Issuers

Data QualityScore

100.00 %

100.00 %

100.00 %

100.00 %

100%0%

Bloomberg Finance LP

LEI issuers achievingmaturity level 3

LEI issuers achievingmaturity level 2

LEI issuers achievingmaturity level 1

L3 Excellent qualityL2 Expected qualityL1 Required quality

INFOCAMERE - SOCIETA'CONSORTILE DI INFORMATICA DELL...

Krajowy Depozyt PapierówWartościowych S.A. (KDPW)

Centrální Depozitář Cenných Papírů, a.s.(CSD Prague...

GS1 Germany GmbH

19/30 (63%) 16/30 (53%) 13/30 (43%)

Summary

Top 5 Countries – Data Quality Score

China, Isle Of Man, Lithuania, Malaysia, Nigeria