global best practice for managing innovation ecosystems...

Global Best Practice for Managing Innovation Ecosystems and Hubs

Copyright and all rights reserved.

Dr. Martti Launonen Chairman of the Board, Hubconcepts Inc.

[email protected]

Global innovation trends and emerging challenges for innovation creation

- Value network advantage & competition - Open innovation model in borderless, connected world

- Management of continuous change (scanning & driving) - Virtualization of interconnections (scale effect) - Management of global partnerships

- Ability to connect talent, network, clusters & processes

2 Copyright and all rights reserved.

The development focus shifts to managing innovation partnerships and networks

A successful innovation system must include:

1. Strong basis in local know-how and pool of talent

2. Clear target to achieve international best-practice

3. Global reach and goals

4. Networking relationships with the top-runners

5. Access to continuous flow of attractive players

It is all about collaboration in global context


Nat

ion

al o

r R

egio

nal

In

nov

atio

n S

yste

m

Global hubs and innovation labs

Regional and global development programs

Support for growth companies

Joint Platforms

Joint R&D

Joint Commercialization

Practical development targets for the regional innovation eco-systems

Public support

4-5 years 2-3 years on-going

Regional pre-conditions: 1 – potential of existing innovation system (=audits) 2 – willingness to utilise this potential (=active participation)

Joint Innovation capacity


Background for Hub Framework Development

1. Visits and discussions in over 250 science & technology parks

2. Consultation for over 100 STPs, innovation centers and clusters

3. Advisory work for foreign governments and STPs

4. Hands-on management of STPs, regional programs, clusters & centers

5. Tested on selected (7) best-practice sites around the world

Countries and sites include: USA, China, Russia, Japan, South-Korea, Canada, UK, France, Poland, Croatia, Estonia, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Australia, New-Zealand, South-Africa, Mozambique, Botswana, Namibia, Thailand

Copyright and all rights reserved. 6

The global innovation HUB development concept

Company and forum driven activities

Public-private partnerships

Public policy driven activities

“Smart Handover”

National /Regional Innovation Policy

Research & Development Activities

Education (elementary to university)

Physical Infrastructure and Service Structures

Cluster Policies & Programs

Start-ups

Living Labs / Test-Beds

Incubation Environments

Anchors

Growth SMEs


Hubconcepts’ case studies 2010: The global best practice for developing

the regional innovation environments and hubs

ASIA Daejeon, The Republic of Korea

Shanghai, The People’s Republic of China Kanagawa, Japan

USA

Silicon Valley, California Research Triangle Park, North Carolina

EUROPE

Sophia Antipolis, France Cambridge, United Kingdom


Case: Daejeon, Korea

70






Start-ups



Anchors

Growth SMEs 70

60

40

20

40

80

70

70

90

70


Case: Shanghai, China






Start-ups



Anchors

Growth SMEs

100

60

50

50

30

40

70

70

80

90

Technology Innovation Area

Biotech & Pharma Phase I

Residential Zone

Semiconductor Phase II

Semiconductor Phase I

Biotech & Pharma Phase II

Scientific Research and Education Zone


Case: Kanagawa, Japan






Start-ups



Anchors

Growth SMEs

70

50

40

50

50

40

80

70

80

80

Kanagawa Science Park (KSP)

KBIC/K²

THINK

Kawasaki Waterfront Area

Haneda Airport

= Major industrial R&D site


Case: Silicon Valley, CA USA






Start-ups



Anchors

Growth SMEs

100

90

90

100

80

60

90

100

90

80

The Silicon Valley outline

Stanford University

UC Berkeley UC San Francisco


Case: Research Triangle Park, NC USA





Start-ups



Anchors

Growth SMEs

70

50

40

50

40

40

80

80

80

National /Regional Innovation Policy 80

The Triangle Region

The RTP


Case: Sophia Antipolis, France






Start-ups



Anchors

Growth SMEs

90

70

50

40

70

80

80

80

80

90

Sophia Antipolis

Côte d’Azur


Case: Cambridge, UK





Start-ups



Anchors

Growth SMEs

80

70

70

70

30

60

90

90

80

Physical Infrastructure and Service Structures 80

= a science and technology park = a university


Key Features of Future Cities

Large scale urban development

Impact of energy efficiency

Meeting mobility needs

Managing water for future

Meeting energy demand through Non-Conventional sources

Smart Service delivery

• Industrial corridors • Smart cities • Urban renewal programs

• From CFL to LED revolution • Smart grids • Green buildings/industries

• Public transportation (BRT, Monorail, Metro rail) • Shared vehicle services • NMT (Non-motorized transit) Electric Vehicle • Reducing non revenue water (NRW) • Re-use and recycle • Water treatment

• Waste to energy • Renewable energy • Bio – Energy

• Outsourcing • PPP • E- governance

Copyright and all rights reserved. CONFIDENTIAL

1. Smart City Master Plan • Smart government • Smart grids • Smart business • Smart lifestyle

2. Green Buildings & Districts • Design guidelines • Eco-City KPI‘s • Sustainability guidelines

3. Innovation Capacity Base • University Education Projects • Vocational Training Centers • Library master plans

Complementing Development Layers


The 3-in-1 Future Cities

Integrated Operating Center Smart Homes E-Health IC Card Security Systems E-government Solutions

District cooling/heating Distributed Energy Systems Water management Waste management Electric Vehicle (EV) Systems Renewable energy Systems

Innovation/R&D Clusters Eco-Technologies R&D 3-in-1 City Related R&D Programs and Projects Virtual learning / classrooms Vocational Education Centers

Smart City Eco City Learning City

Smart Grid / Micro Grid + Common IT Platform + Cloud Computing Strategy Intelligent Transportation and Mobility


Otaniemi

18

Otaniemi, Finland





Start-ups



Anchors

Growth SMEs

80

70

70

70

30

60

90

90

80

Physical Infrastructure and Service Structures 80

Cambridge, UK





Start-ups



Anchors

Growth SMEs

90

70

50

40

70

80

80

80

80

90

Sophia Antipolis, France

Operations

Evaluation -> Roadmap -> Implementation


Kansalliset ja alueelliset ohjelmat ja säädösympäristö

T&K ympäristö

Koulutus (perusopetuksesta yliopistoihin)

Fyysinen ympäristö ja palvelurakenteet

Klusteriohjelmat

Pk-yritykset

Testiympäristöt ja -alustat

Hautomoympäristöt

Ankkurit

Kasvuyritykset

Kansalliset ja alueelliset ohjelmat ja säädösympäristö

T&K ympäristö

Koulutus (perusopetuksesta yliopistoihin)

Fyysiset ympäristö ja palvelurakenteet

Klusteriohjelmat

Pk-yritykset

Testiympäristöt ja -alustat

Hautomoympäristöt

Ankkurit

Kasvuyritykset

I: Present profile

II: Target profile

III. Implementation

Roadmap

Innovation is both global and local

Networking

Open innovation Virtual

Interconnected

Shared


- Hubconcepts - The Global Best-Practice for managing the

innovation hubs and STPs

New book published in January 2011 !

www.hubconcepts.com

global best practice for managing innovation ecosystems...

Documents