g.j mack and r.t.lee royal london hospital, u.k
DESCRIPTION
A Prospective Comparison of the Effects of the Twin Block Appliance and the Dynamax Appliance on the Skeletal and Dental Tissues. G.J MACK and R.T.LEE Royal London Hospital, U.K. The Royal London Hospital. AIMS. To compare the dental and skeletal effects of the Dynamax and the Twin block - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: G.J MACK and R.T.LEE Royal London Hospital, U.K](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814f52550346895dbcf99e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
A Prospective Comparison of the Effects of the Twin Block Appliance and the Dynamax Appliance on the Skeletal and Dental Tissues
G.J MACK and R.T.LEE Royal London Hospital, U.K
![Page 2: G.J MACK and R.T.LEE Royal London Hospital, U.K](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814f52550346895dbcf99e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The Royal London Hospital
![Page 3: G.J MACK and R.T.LEE Royal London Hospital, U.K](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814f52550346895dbcf99e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
AIMS
To compare the dental and skeletal effects of the Dynamax and the Twin block
To investigate the incidence of breakages and the compliance rates
![Page 4: G.J MACK and R.T.LEE Royal London Hospital, U.K](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814f52550346895dbcf99e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
SUBJECTS and METHODS
Inclusion Criteria• Caucasians• Overjet 7mm, Class II
molars • Males 12-14 years • Females 10-13 years• No relevant Medical History• No extractions
![Page 5: G.J MACK and R.T.LEE Royal London Hospital, U.K](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814f52550346895dbcf99e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
The Dynamax Appliance
Bass and Bass, JCO, 2003
![Page 6: G.J MACK and R.T.LEE Royal London Hospital, U.K](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814f52550346895dbcf99e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
The Twin Block Appliance
Gill and Lee, AJODO, 2005
![Page 7: G.J MACK and R.T.LEE Royal London Hospital, U.K](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814f52550346895dbcf99e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Treatment Protocol
Start 3 and 6 months
9 months
12 months
Treatment Appliance Inserted
Dynamax activated
2 mm
Appliance Removed
Records Lat CephLaser Scan
HeightOJ
Laser Scan
HeightOJ
Laser Scan
HeightOJ
Lat CephLaser Scan
HeightOJ
![Page 8: G.J MACK and R.T.LEE Royal London Hospital, U.K](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814f52550346895dbcf99e/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Constructed Horizontal 7º to SN
N
ANS
Me Pog
Cephalometry
A-PointA-Point
![Page 9: G.J MACK and R.T.LEE Royal London Hospital, U.K](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814f52550346895dbcf99e/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
RESULTS
Patients enrolled into Trial N=62
Males=28 Females=34
![Page 10: G.J MACK and R.T.LEE Royal London Hospital, U.K](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814f52550346895dbcf99e/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
RESULTS
Patients enrolled into Trial N=62
Males=28 Females=34
Allocated to Twin block N=31
Males=14 Females=17
Allocated to Dynamax N=31
Males=14 Females=17
![Page 11: G.J MACK and R.T.LEE Royal London Hospital, U.K](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814f52550346895dbcf99e/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
RESULTS
Patients enrolled into Trial N=62
Males=28 Females=34
Allocated to Twin block N=31
Males=14 =1 Females=17
Allocated to Dynamax N=31
Males=14 Females=17
Completed trial N=28
Males=13 Females=15
Completed trial N=28
Males=13 Females=15
![Page 12: G.J MACK and R.T.LEE Royal London Hospital, U.K](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814f52550346895dbcf99e/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
RESULTS
Statural Height Dental Changes Skeletal Changes Compliance Breakages
![Page 13: G.J MACK and R.T.LEE Royal London Hospital, U.K](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814f52550346895dbcf99e/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Statural Height Changes 0-12 months
(P=0.88)
Dynamax Twin block
m= 57 mm
m= 67 mm
mill
imete
rs
0
50
100
150
![Page 14: G.J MACK and R.T.LEE Royal London Hospital, U.K](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814f52550346895dbcf99e/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
RESULTS
Statural Height Dental Changes Skeletal Changes Compliance Breakages
![Page 15: G.J MACK and R.T.LEE Royal London Hospital, U.K](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814f52550346895dbcf99e/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Overjet Reduction 0-9 months
(P=0.20)
0
4
8
12
Dynamax Twin block
m= 5mm m= 6mm
mill
imete
rs
![Page 16: G.J MACK and R.T.LEE Royal London Hospital, U.K](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814f52550346895dbcf99e/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
U1-Maxillary Plane(P=0.96)
m= -3.0ºm= -1.7º
Dynamax Twin block-12
-6
0
6
deg
rees
![Page 17: G.J MACK and R.T.LEE Royal London Hospital, U.K](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814f52550346895dbcf99e/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
L1-Mandibular Plane(P=0.41)
m= 2.3º
m= 2.3º
Dynamax Twin block-5
0
5
10
deg
rees
![Page 18: G.J MACK and R.T.LEE Royal London Hospital, U.K](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814f52550346895dbcf99e/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
RESULTS
Statural Height Dental Changes Skeletal Changes Compliance Breakages
![Page 19: G.J MACK and R.T.LEE Royal London Hospital, U.K](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814f52550346895dbcf99e/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
A-Point to S-Vertical(P=0.77)
m= 0.4mmm= 0.1mm
-2
0
2
4
Dynamax Twin block
mill
imete
rs
![Page 20: G.J MACK and R.T.LEE Royal London Hospital, U.K](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814f52550346895dbcf99e/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Pogonion to S-Vertical(P=0.19)
m= 2.0mm m= 2.1mm
Dynamax Twin block-5
0
5
1
mill
imete
rs
![Page 21: G.J MACK and R.T.LEE Royal London Hospital, U.K](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814f52550346895dbcf99e/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Total Anterior Face Height (P=0.03)
m= 2.8mmm= 3.2mm
Dynamax Twin block
-2
0
2
4
6
8
mill
imete
rs
![Page 22: G.J MACK and R.T.LEE Royal London Hospital, U.K](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814f52550346895dbcf99e/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
RESULTS
Statural Height Dental Changes Skeletal Changes Compliance Breakages
![Page 23: G.J MACK and R.T.LEE Royal London Hospital, U.K](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814f52550346895dbcf99e/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Compliance
Dynamax Twin Block
Not Completing Trial 3 3
Not Reducing Overjet by 10% after 6 months
1 1
Non Compliance Rate (%) 12 12
![Page 24: G.J MACK and R.T.LEE Royal London Hospital, U.K](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814f52550346895dbcf99e/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
RESULTS
Statural Height Dental Changes Skeletal Changes Compliance Breakages
![Page 25: G.J MACK and R.T.LEE Royal London Hospital, U.K](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814f52550346895dbcf99e/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Appliance Breakages
Dynamax Twin Block
Upper Appliance
19 5
Lower Appliance
3 7
![Page 26: G.J MACK and R.T.LEE Royal London Hospital, U.K](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814f52550346895dbcf99e/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
CONCLUSIONS
The dental changes were similar for both appliances
The antero-posterior skeletal changes, including mandibular advancement, were similar for both appliances
The vertical dimension increased to a lesser extent with the Dynamax
Both appliances were well tolerated More breakages occurred with the Dynamax