GISC 6383

Geographic Information Systems Management & Implementation

Dr. Ronald BriggsThe University of Texas at Dallas

Program in Geographic Information Sciences

Introduction:The Challenges

Personal Nuts and Bolts

Dr. Ronald Briggs Office: Green 3.212 Phone: 972-883-6877 (o), 972-345-6918 (cell) Office hours:

– T/Th 6:30-7:00; – Wed 3:00-4:00 – & by appointment, or feel free to drop-in

Email: briggs@utdallas.edu or rbriggs@utdallas.edu Web: www.utdallas.edu/~briggs/gisc6383.html

Evaluation– midterm exam (25%) (“T/F with explanation”)

Sample on web site– final exam (30%) (“T/F with explanation”)

Sample on web site– Technology Assessment report (20%): group project – Implementation Plan (25%): individual project

More about the two projects later Dates/Deadlines are all on the course syllabus

Evaluation

Texts Tomlinson, Roger Thinking about GIS: GIS Planning for Managers

ESRI Press, 2005 2nd ed. (1st ed is OK)Zeiler, M. Modeling our World: The ESRI Guide to Geodatabase Design

ESRI Press, 1999

Alternative Texts to Tomlinson : Huxhold, William E. and Levinsohn, Allan G. Managing Geographic Information System

Projects New York: Oxford, 1995Harmon and Anderson The Design and implementation of Geographic Information Systems

Wiley, 2003

Alternative Texts and Useful BooksManagement/People focusedObermeyer, Nancy J. and Pinto, Jeffrey K. Managing Geographic Information Systems New York:

The Guilford Press, 1994 (dated and very academic)von Meyer, Nancy and R. Scott Oppman Enterprise GIS.

URISA, 1999, 98 pp. (set of case studies)Derek Reeve, GIS, Organizations and People London: Taylor & Francis, 2000 (UK case studies)Heather Campbell and Ian Masser GIS and Organizations London Taylor and Francis, 1995

(earlier edition of Reeve)

Technology focusedKorte, George B. The GIS Book Santa Fe: Onword Press, 5th Ed. 2001Hohl, Pat GIS Data Conversion: Strategies, Techniques, Management Santa Fe, Onword Press,

1998Yong-Qi Chen and Yuk-Cheung Lee Geographical Data Acquisition Springer-Verlag, 2001, Shashi Shekhar and Sanjay Chawla Spatial Databases: A Tour Prentice Hall, 2003

ESRI PRESS Application area series

Public Sector O’Looney, John Beyond Maps: GIS and Decision Making in Local

Government, 2000--- excellent! Fleming, Cory The GIS Guide for Local Government Officials , 2005 Huxhold, W.E. ArcGIS and the Digital City: A hands-on approach

for local government, 2004 Green, R.W. Open Access-GIS in E-Government, 2001 Green, R.W. GIS in Public Policy Amdahl, G. Disaster Response: GIS for Public Safety, 2001 Green, R.W. Confronting Catastrophe: A GIS Handbook, 2002 LeGates, R. Think Globally, Act Regionally: GIS and data

visualization for social science and public policy research, 2005

ESRI PRESS Application area series

Private Sector/Specific Application Areas Boyles, C.T. Measuring Up: The Business Case for GIS, 2004 Harder, C. GIS Means Business, 1998 Lang, L. Managing Natural Resources with GIS, 1998 Harder, Christian Enterprise GIS for Energy Companies, 1999 Lang, Laura GIS for Health Organizations, 2000 Godin, Lisa GIS in Telecommunications, 2001 Lang, Laura Transportation GIS, 1999 Godin, Lisa GIS in Telecommunications, 2001 Herzog, David Mapping the News: GIS in Jounalism, 2003

(features UTD!) Harder, C. Enterprise GIS for Energy Companies 1999 Lang, L. Managing Natural Resources with GIS, 1998 Hanna, K GIS for Landscape Architects, 1999

Semester Student Assignments Provide a State-of-the-Art Technology Assessment report for a selected

topic: – class presentation to be made on assigned date and accompanied by written

evaluation – See course outline for example topics: you may select others– 2 or 3 people per group (no more and no less: 12 groups max.)

Prepare a GIS Implementation Plan for an organization, using principles outlined in class– 1. By or before date of Midterm, identify organization and send me e-mail outlining

your intentions.– 2. Turn in your written report (target 10-15 pages) at semester end.

See course syllabus for exact due dates. See Web site for additional details.

Course Objectives to understand the fundamentals of implementing

and managing Geographic Information Systems within modern organizations – maximizing the liklihood of success– minimizing the liklihood of failures

What is a GIS?A GIS allows the geographic features in real

world locations to be digitally represented so that they can be abstractly presented in map (analog) form, and they can be worked with and manipulated to address some problem.

It can be the basis for:•conducting a project, •running one or more departments within an organization, •or for managing an entire enterprise.

Real WorldA city wants you to propose a plan for re-organizing its primary operations (80% of which are geographic based) so that standard daily operations, as well as longer-term decision making, can be accomplished more speedily and efficiently. You propose an inter-departmental shared GIS to replace paper maps and documents associated with daily operations and to improve data and information flow between departments to enhance and speed-up decision-making.

Real World Texas Super High Speed

Rail asks YOU to propose alternative routes, with initial cost estimates, for high speed rail lines linking Dallas, Houston, San Antonio. The initial plan should be ready next month. You use GIS to examine alternative corridors and estimate costs.

An Oil company wants to start documenting it’s oil production by well. They own or lease over 30 thousand

wells worldwide. Set up a GIS that can accept reporting data on a daily basis and analyze production trends.

Add natural features Add human features Add socio-economic

data Utilize industry

standard commercial database (Oracle, SQL Server, etc.)

• A City wants YOU to supply it with all it’s base mapping, set up it’s new computers/GIS network so maps can be shared

between departments, train it’s users and make quarterly updates for them until they hire a GIS Coordinator. They

need a proposal in two weeks.

Real WorldYou are an intern in the city fire department. The fire chief has heard of GIS and thinks it could help them with their planning. Being young, educated, somewhat computer literate, but not trained to go out on fire-trucks (thus in the chief’s eye relatively useless), you are asked to research this and make recommendations.

GIS Scope

Project Single department application (Departmental GIS) Multi departmental application Enterprise system (Enterprise GIS) Multi Institutional endeavor (Community GIS)

Institutional Environment– Expected result is a product– Project has an end date– Costs paid by project– No long-term support expected & no commitment to GIS– little or no organizational impact

GIS Implementation Approach– One-time effort – need best tool for the job– consultant or contractor may do entire thing

Benefit– product produced on-time & within budget

highway feasibility study completed rail line corridor study complete

Level I: Project

Institutional Environment– Small Institution or Single Department– Well-defined, existing business function to be supported – Ongoing support is required but no major commitment to GIS– Little or no reorganization e.g. manual drafters shift to GIS workstation– Managed by departmental responsible for business activity– Corporate support nice, but not needed

GIS Implementation Approach– PCs, with local department network– File-based spatial data; maybe CAD focused– Little or no integration with attribute databases– Little or no sharing of information within or

beyond department Benefit

– supports specific business task more effectively and efficiently

Level II: Single Department(but perhaps multiple of them!)

Example:automate map production or manage storm water drainage system

Institutional Environment– Mid-size to large institution, more than one department– More significant commitment of staff and budget to GIS– Ongoing support and update strategies essential – Some organizational or functional adjustments required – perhaps run as a service department or managed by cooperating departments – corporate support helps, but not essential

GIS Implementation– Multiple, networked PCs– Topological GIS data– Relational database– Some information sharing between departments

Benefit– Improves effectiveness of specific business tasks– Improved operational efficiency– Integration of business functions– Better use of limited resources

Level III: Multi-Department/Service Resource

Example:automate map production and manage storm water drainage system

Institutional Environment– Usually medium to large institution, multiple departments– High level long-term commitment of staff and resources to GIS– Organization-level strategic planning via formal methodology, distributed

implementation and maintenance– Incorporation of GIS as part of organizational infrastructure for production of

services; significant organizational adjustments– corporate management support and involvement of corporate is essential

GIS Implementation– Distributed client-server networks– Integration of multiple GIS, database, and related technologies– Multi-department data sharing, – standards and metadata essential

Benefit: as for multi-department, plus– Emphasis is improved effectiveness (better ,not just cheaper!)– Consistent information– Better decision making– Better external service to citizens and customers

Level IV: Enterprise System

Example: “Calgary Implements Enterprise GIS”ARCNews, v. 21, #2, 1999

Level V: Multi-Organizational Institutional Environment

– public organizations, most probably; industry alliance possibly, but anti-trust laws may be a problem

– Multi-participant organizational structure for planning and policy– Distributed maintenance responsibilities across organizations– Long-term, high level commitment among participating organizations– Significant reorganization of functions across organizations

GIS Implementation– Distributed maintenance of shared elements– Data exchange facility via Internet or other WAN– Data integration from multiple technologies– standards and metadata paramount

Benefits– lower costs to citizen/tax payer– enhanced competitive position

Example:State government, metropolitan area, industry alliance

Scope of Management Challenge Know how to use GIS as a tool

– route fire or garbage trucks– draw maps

Understand how GIS can be used to meet the goals and objectives of your unit or organization– reduce losses from fires– enhance service to citizens/customers

Appreciate the challenge of integrating GIS enterprise-wide into the organization to enhance its efficiency and effectiveness– This is what we will do!!!

Gets harder!

Fundamental Management Responsibilities

Plan!– Taking the hits as they come is not management!

If you don’t know where you are going, you never get there The unexpected should never be expected

Standardize! – Free-for-all throughout the organization is not management!– Standards are paramount

Document!– Relying on people’s heads as the depository for organizational

knowledge is not management!

Take a Break!

GIS Implementation no guaranteed recipe for success no cookie-cutter formula to applyBUT there are general procedures and processes

(models) which can help immeasurably ignorance of problems & past failures is not bliss to be forewarned is to be forearmed!

Context for Successful GIS Implementation(What you need to understand: primary course topics)

GIS Paradigm– Use of spatial location as integrating framework for information– Understanding the GIS paradigm the focus of GISC 6381 Fund.

Geographic Data Management Principles– Extend data management principles to include geographic focus– db (database) principles one major component of this course

Technology– Select appropriate GIS-enabling technology and plan to evolve– Addressed via student group technology reports

Organizational Setting– Organizational setting a crucial ingredient to success/failure– Systematic GIS design process essential for enterprise-wide

applications: major topic for this course

Steps in a GIS Project I. Data acquisition

(never underestimate the cost!)– paper maps– digital files– remote sensing/satellite– fieldwork

II. Preprocessing: preparation & integration– format conversion– digitizing and/or scanning– edge matching and rectification

III. Data Management– variable selection & definition– table design

(performance v. usability)– CRUD policies/procedures: Create

(data entry), Retrieve (view), Update (change), Deletion (remove)

IV. Manipulation and Analysis (all the user cares about!)– address matching– network analysis– terrain modelling (e.g. slopes,

aspects) V. Product Generation

– tabular reports– graphics (maps and charts)Appropriate for a project,

but insufficient for an enterprise implementation.

retirement savings?boats & cars?kids college?residence?

GIS Enterprise Planning Process: general strategy Conceptual Design/Needs Assessment/Requirements/ why do it

– does it support organization’s goal or strategic plan?– Tomlinson Chap 3, 4, 5 Chap. 11– Huxhold Chap. 3 Strategic Planning for GIS

Logical Design: what it does– what business process(es) will be supported?– Tomlinson Chap 6 ,7 – Huxhold Chap. 5 Systems Design Methodology

Physical design: how it will do it– hardware, software, data, applications, people & their management– Tomlinson Chap 8, Chap 9, Chap 10– Huxhold Chap. 4 Implementation Planning

Implementation: getting it going– actually doing it!– Tomlinson Chap 12– Huxhold Chap. 6 Implementation Management

On-going System Management: keeping it going– operations, maintenance, update and use– Huxhold Chap. 7 Managing the System

bachelor padm-no-k

core familyextended family

Ranch or 3 storyfloorplans

wood or bricktub or shower

Dirt fliesconcrete poured

Move in.

Living there.Maintenance

Home improvements

…if you were building your dream house, would you use blueprints?

GIS Development GuidesState of New York, Local Government Technology Services (1997)

47

http://www.sara.nysed.gov/pubs/gis/gisindex.htm

An 11-step Process1

652

8

3

9 9 11

NeedsAssessment

ConceptualDesign

AvailableData Survey

H/W & S/WSurvey

Pilot/Benchmark

DatabasePlanningand Design

DatabaseConstruction

Acquisition ofGIS Hardwareand Software

GIS SystemIntegration

ApplicationDevelopment

GIS Use andDatabaseMaintenance

An 11-step processAn 11-step process.An 11-step process

A 10-Stage GIS Planing MethodologyTomlinson, Thinking About GIS

Consider the strategic purpose Plan for the planning Conduct a technology seminar Describe the information products Define the system scope Create a data design Choose a logical model Determine system requirements Benefit-cost, migration and risk analysis Make an implementation plan

Conceptual Design

Logical Design

Physical Design

Implementation

7. Request forProposal (RFP)

11. Implementation

Plan

12.Contract

13. Acceptance Testing

1.Definition ofObjectives

2. User Requirements

3. Preliminary Design

4. Cost-BenefitAnalysis

5. Pilot Study

Analysis of Requirements

6. Final Design

8. Shortlisting

9. Benchmark Testing

10. Cost-Effectiveness

Evaluation

A Fourteen Step Implementation Process!

14. Implementation

Source: Longley, et. al. p. 391

(assumes external acquisition)

Specification of Requirements

Evaluation ofAlternatives

Implementation of System

Five-step Process from Somers/URISAPlan

Analyze

Design

Acquire & Develop

Operate &Maintain

Source: Rebecca Somers, Quick Guide to GIS Implementation and Management Park Ridge, IL: Urban and Regional Information Systems Association, 2001, p.7

Conceptual design

Logical design

Physical design

Implementation

“Its not the order or precise structure of the tasks but rather that, in one way or another, all get completed.”

GIS Development GuidesState of New York, Local Government Technology Services (1997)

But…..no guaranteed recipe for success!

Evolution of Issues During ImplementationCampbell, (1992)

Technological, associated with system compatibility

data-related, associated with lack of consistency between data sets

organizational, associated with data ownership and control

institutional, associated with how to use information in the policy-making process

Each challenge must be overcome as the implementation process proceeds.

as im

plem

enta

tion

proc

e eds

Human Factors ParamountCampbell, 1992

Organizations, and units in them, jealously guard their scope of activity and treat with suspicion proposals that may change this

administrative applications associated with cost savings are more readily accepted than decision-making applications to be used by policy makers

local communities very suspicious of developments that suggest centralization of information and therefore power

GIS techies often uncomfortable with social and political aspects of system implementation and utilization, thus need to involve politically-adept users/line managers/policy makers

People problems paramount!

"....As far as your project goes, I'm willing to help but I'm not sure we are the ideal candidate for the project. I'm working for the Department of Natural Resources which covers a lot of territory: Oil and Gas Administration, Water Administration, Game and Fish Department, Land Administration, etc. etc. All these departments are sort of run as little fiefdoms with each not really working with the others unless they have to. It's sort of the norm, nobody wants to coordinate with anyone else. I know from attempts in the past that it is nearly impossible to get information or data from these guys. In some cases we have ended up collecting our own data just because we couldn't get copies from other departments. We had a full time planner spend the better part of a year meeting with department heads to try to identify their needs, update the status of various projects, and come up with a plan for the future. Very frustrating as this was all work that was going to help them but they didn't want to cooperate at all. Long story short, I'm willing to help but can't commit much time to dealing with these idiots, trying to get information out of them. This is a weird little environment and not really like the "real world" in a lot of respects..."

Quote from an e-mail received by a student in GISC 6383

Conclusion: GIS Implementation a comprehensive, systematic approach to planning, design and

implementation will more likely produce a successful GIS implementation--but no guarantees!

GIS is both an enabling technology and a set of concepts about organizing work and data, thus it will impact an organization’s established “way of doing business”

management and institutional issues raise the greatest challenges, thus must be addressed – “The only human that loves change is a baby in diapers”:

open, participative processes are more likely to deal successfully with with these management and institutional issues ( and the technical ones!), therefore involve people

GIS is a complex information technology application, thus many of the same principles apply as in IT…...

Conclusion: Information Technology Implementation

Organizational change is both a cause and an effect of evolving information technology

Human aspects of organizational change are more important and challenging than technical aspects

While information technology can improve organizational performance, the technology alone will not transform an organization

Successful implementation depends on planned, well-conceived and managed integration of information technology change and organizational change

A corresponding list of implementation challenges from an IT text!

Conclusion: GIS within Context

D ata S oftw are A p p lica tion s P eop le H ard ware

G IS

Management

Organizational Context--people and processes

Organization’sGoals and Strategies

Technological Environment

Organizational Context--people and processes