geotechnical earthquake engineering for seismic design design framework.pdf · geotechnical...

16
Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering for Seismic Design Prof. Ellen M. Rathje, Ph.D., P.E. University of Texas at Austin Jeff Bachhuber M S CEG Jeff Bachhuber , M.S., C.E.G. Ranon Dulberg Fugro/William Lettis and Associates Prof. Brady R. Cox, Ph.D., P.E. University of Arkansas 18-19 November 2010

Upload: others

Post on 01-Jun-2020

31 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

TRANSCRIPT

Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering for Seismic Design

Prof. Ellen M. Rathje, Ph.D., P.E.University of Texas at Austin

Jeff Bachhuber M S C E GJeff Bachhuber, M.S., C.E.G. Ranon Dulberg

Fugro/William Lettis and AssociatesProf. Brady R. Cox, Ph.D., P.E.

University of Arkansas

18-19 November 2010

Seismic Design Framework: gCharacterizing sources and

estimating ground shaking for designestimating ground shaking for design

Prof. Ellen M. Rathje, Ph.D., P.E.

Department of Civil Architectural andDepartment of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering

University of Texas at Austin

18 November 2010

Seismic Design FrameworkSource Characterization

Locations of sources (faults)Magnitude (M )Magnitude (Mw)

RecurrenceGround Motion Characterization

Closest distance fault to site (R )For what level of shaking

should we design?

Closest distance fault to site (Rrup)Local site conditions

Ground Motion LevelLi f i ?

Palo Alto

R

Liquefaction?Landslide?

Rrup

Soil conditionsTopographic conditions

Seismic Design Framework

• Characterizing sourcesLocations of sources− Locations of sources

− Expected maximum magnitudeR (h ft d th k )− Recurrence (how often do earthquakes occur)

− Focal mechanism• Characterizing ground shaking

− Distance from source− Local site conditions

Ground motion =Ground motion fxn (magnitude, distance, site conditions)

Locations of Sources

• Geologic mappingIdentify offsets− Identify offsets

− Identify linear featuresS i i it• Seismicity− Small earthquakes

l tioccur along active seismic zonesNeed a sensiti e− Need a sensitive seismic network to monitor smallmonitor small earthquakes

USGS Seismicity Map of Haiti

Maximum Mw and Recurrence• Maximum Magnitude

− Maximum M is related to length of faultMaximum Mw is related to length of fault− Mw = 6 ; Rupture length ~ 5 km− M = 7 : Rupture length ~ 50 km− Mw = 7 : Rupture length ~ 50 km− Mw = 8 : Rupture length ~ 325 km

R (ti b t th k )• Recurrence (time between earthquakes)− Offsets from large earthquakes leave a record

ithi di twithin sediments− Identify and date significant

offsets (paleoseismicity)offsets (paleoseismicity)

Characterizing Ground Motions

• Closest distance (Rrup)Closest distance between the fault rupture− Closest distance between the fault rupture plane and the site

Rrup

Rrup

Dipping Faults Vertically Dipping Faults

Characterizing Ground Motions

• Local site conditionsCharacterized by the shear wave velocity (V ) of− Characterized by the shear wave velocity (Vs) of the underlying materials

− V is also a measure of theVs is also a measure of the maximum shear stiffness (Gmax)

Material Vs (m/s)

R k > 760 /Rock > 760 m/s

Stiff Soil ~400 – 500 m/s

Soft Soil < 180 m/s

Predicting Ground Shaking

• Ground motion prediction equations (GMPE)Statistical models to predict ground shaking− Statistical models to predict ground shaking

− Based on thousands of recordings from previous earthquakesprevious earthquakes

− Developed for different tectonic regions (shallow crustal regions subduction zones intra-plate)crustal regions, subduction zones, intra plate)

ln (Y) = fsource (M, mechanism) + fdistance (M, Rrup) + fsite (Vs, others)

Predicting Ground Shaking

• Ground motions have large scatter!1994 Northridge (Mw = 6.7) Earthquake in California

ion

(g) Range in Acceleration

0.17 g to 0.7 g

Acc

eler

atPe

ak A

From D. BooreDistance (km)

Liquefaction

• Liquefaction occurs in loose, saturated dsand

Saturated: Below the ground water table

Loose: Assessed by the Standard PenetrationStandard Penetration Test blowcount (N)

Standard Penetration Test (SPT)• 63.5 kg mass dropped 0.75 m on

top of drill rod• 5 cm diameter split spoon sampler • Count blows to advance sampler

3 15 cm intervals3, 15 cm intervals

N = blowcount = # blows / 30 cm from the 2nd and 3rd 15 cm intervals

Li f ti P t ti l N (bl/30 )Liquefaction Potential N (bl/30 cm)Not liquefiable > 30

Moderate 15 30Moderate 15 - 30High 0 - 15

Earthquake-Induced Landslides

• Earthquake shaking can destabilize hill id d thillsides and cause movements

From USGS

Yield Acceleration (k ): acceleration that starts a failureYield Acceleration (ky): acceleration that starts a failureInfluenced by slope angle and material strength

Maps of ky

ky Map

DEM

Slope Angle

Shear Strength (c, )

Data from California Geological Survey (CGS) for Mint Canyon

Quadrangle

Seismic Design Framework

• Characterizing sourcesLocations of sources− Locations of sources

− Expected maximum magnitude, mechanismR (h ft )− Recurrence (how often)

• Characterizing ground shaking− Distance from source− Local site conditions

• Additional effects− Liquefactionq− Landslides