LA LTEEGEO:EXPLORATION - SERVICES

PHYSIQUE O G l Q U E

41016SW80M 2 .7756 MARION (7)1(7)

GEOPHYSICAL WORK

PROPERTY OF

FALCONBRIDGE NICKEL MINES LIMITED

HEENAN PROJECT HEENAN, MARION l GEONA TOWNSHIPS

PROVINCE OF ONTARIO

NOVEMBER 1982 C. LAVOIE, Ph.D.

RECEIVEDJAN 31 B85

MINING LANDS SECTION

VAl 0. 0t, , OUEBEC , J 9P d N9 r is, I 819 , 8?r.-82i?

INTRODUCTION

A horizontal loop electromagnetic survey was carried out over a property owned by Falconbridge Nickel Mines Limited during the period of October 12 to November l, 1982. this property is located in Heenan and Marion townships, province of Ontario.

The purpose of this H.E.M. survey was to locate and define in the field conductive zones already detected by an Input Airborn survey.

PROPERTY. LOCATION AND ACCESS

The property is located at 60 miles South west of the town of Timmins, along Woman River in Heenan and Marion townships, province of Ontario.

The property includes several claims which arc listed at the ?nd of this report.

Access to the property is possible by plane from Yvanhoe Lake located along Highway 101 at 100 kilome ters West of the tpwn of Timmins. From Yvanhoe Lake, it takes approximately one half (j) hour (50 km) to fly to the property.

GEO LA LTEEP M V S l O U ll O O l U U l

- 2 -

GEOPHYSICAL WORK

During the period of October 12 to November l, 1982, a horizontal loop electromagnetic (H.E.M.) survey wa^ carried out over 200 foot grid systems.

A tptal of 34 miles was surveyed with the electromagnetic horizontal loop method, using an Apex Maxmin II, operating at frequencies of 888 and 3,555 Hz with a co|i l separation of 400 feet. Readings were taken at 100 foot intervals, with some details at 50 foot on the anomalies. Calibration of the instrument was done before getting on the property, on non-conductive areas.

DISCUSSION ON THE METHOD

The horizontal loop electromagnetic method is capable of delineating zones of conductivity that could represent, but not necessarily, massive con centrations of minerals having metallic conductive pro perties. The comnjon minerals are pyrite, pyrrhotite, chalcopyrite, nickel (but not sphalerite) and graphite. In certain areas, the overburden is a conductor and this may require a grea,t experience to di fferientiate these various sources of conductivity.

GEO LA LTEEl' H S S l t) HI l li l,'i l U U l

- 3 -

In presence of material having a high magnetic susceptibility, the in-phase component of a H.E.M. survey is affected which changes the shape of the anomaly.

DESCRIPTION AND ^NTERPRETATION

On the H:E.M. map we have located the main axes with a darker line while the weaker conduc tive axes or the doubtful ones, were defined with a lighter line. The conductive areas are defined with hatchured lines.

Many conductive axes were located on the map and in order to simplify the presentation of these axes we have described the main conductive axes in a tabulated form which you will find at the end of this report. The magnetic survey which was previously done by Falconbridge Nickel was used to find out if there was any magnetic association with the H.E.M. anomaly. The weaker H.E.M. anomaly axes are not described but are indicated on the map in case it may help to define the direction of weak conductive minerals. However, these may also be due to conductive overburden.

Based on the geophysical results many anomalies are strong enough to deserve a diamond drill hole. However, some may be explained in the field by trenching, and a geological mapping along these conduc tors will certainly change our recommendations on the diamond drilling program.

G EO LA LTEEi' M Y S i O U ll O C, l O U l

- 4 -

In first priority, we will recommend to drill a geological section near the line 294 E in qrder to intersect anomalies nos.10, 11 and 14. This seems to be the best geophysical bet. However, many qthers deserve to be drilled and we are giving our recommendations in annex. Some anomalies have to be detailed before drilling because they were detected at the limit of the property and/or because we do not know their direction.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the present geophysical results, many diamond drill holes {at least 7) should be performed on this property. Before proceeding with the diamond drilling program, we should do some detailed geophysical wprk, geological mapping and sampling along the H.E.M. anomaly axis. This may change the recommended diamond drilling program.

Respectfully submitted,

ermont Lavoi'e, Ph.DT

GEO LA LT&EPHYSIQUE L O G l Q U E

i--

t-1

to \D J*. n H^

en

en o Z l S , CTN

rt e

n to

o

to A .u

o U)

x,

o

o o f^ Oo g1 1rt 00 H

-

' S ft

VO W Q

. a

o ro

B* w

M

rot-1

-i-

OR

D

O t-1

to N)

S h-1

O

O w i o , vo l 1 O

0 o tt Ul Oo

Ql

p*

vQ tQ

- 3"

o r

t

s ro

S.

R v

pO

^

t"1

pj

vQ Distorsion

by

the

ma lin

g recorrmended

wit

13

S

14

(section). Q

l r-.

q

Ofi

r*

o vo en W H"

VD to ro Z l-

1ji 1 l l 1 tn

o o L

O * S

"

Pi

C.

w b

ro H-

o u

O

t3

O15

v*rt

Distorsion of

E.

M. f

by

the

mag.

ro t -

a ~

n^

o CO to (T*

to n to O to en

O Z 1 ro 1 H--

C

f\ VD r

tco

cr\

In

S.

o o LO g S rt ro tt

(Ti

(Dto

rt

pt

rop

t

toS

o W

Extension

of

ano.3 b

L.

262

S-

264

E

no mag.

Should

be

drilled- Q)

C

w r

t w RR

l---

:rv)

'

' v.

j "

0 -J to Co

CTi W t--

OD

M en

o z M 1 l-1

.e* 1 1 s* O O to Oo 1 .

O |

tJ ro Very weak conductor

ble.

Weak

priority. "8 w en

t-1

- iO

J

0

cr\

to en O W t--

vo en oo O Z 1 ji 1 to l .1

. V K

J O O U

) en o

Pt

CC

ro ve

p, 3- vD

ro o

3 ro j. H

-

^r

Distorsion of

E.

M. f

Extension of

ano.5.

of-phase

mainly.

g S'

rt t

-1i a

L..

0 en to eo

.C

Ti W VO eo O

0 Z 0 l vo 1. 1 1 h-*

O CO en

O

si

i?fD

v0

S

Ml

f CO ro r-feak

conductor.

Depe

on

geology.

B. w

UJ

O

.

to eo en W to

o o 0 4L* 1 oo l -o l l li

eo

o 0 co "b II' y

CS

(if s: p- rt ir E.

M.

field

distorsio

nag, but

possible co

tor. a3 i

e..

O eo to eo 01 W ro

o JE^

O o Z. l en 1 en l i 8*

0 O"\ Oo |g^

0)

H-

s|

^ o o

3

Oro

MIrt 3

5eo

- ^V

Mi

P)

WO

W

Ci

M*

rt

WH

-

O

M CSP

o(D

Q

rr

d

rt ro o"

n v

;

ro

O IO to en to W to

o vo 0 o Z l -j l eo SS

i*

OD

M ON

O O eo "b 1

* M

iTO

b

tog

) tt

ooor

or*

"||B Sw StS 8^ /tea

k prior

ity. Line

should be

surveyed .

ro Ul

O M

CO

O

I "

to CO o W to 4? en

o Z l -j l en

rt

vo o

co

to

o lo ON o o CO en

O 8 ?

?"

a b*

ti

o S

rt

{^

5 O

-~

D

Mt

D 1

23 T

3 P"

^M

"

s^r Possib

le contac

t. Lo

sout

h of

a more

mag

n formatio

n. Depe

nds o D ro

nrt-

Q)

\jQ M

^t

ro o

ro

r

MAP

N

O.

ANO

MAL

Y

LIN

E

STA

TIO

N

I.

%

0.

%

c-T

MHO

S

DEP

TH

LEN

GTH

AZI

MU

TH

MAG

NET

IC

m 3:

.*

-i S

'

-n 4 ICO

"K P o o o Ml

rt

AS

SO

CIA

TIO

N

70

J*

70 m

o

O m l O

2:

V)

PR

IOR

ITY

o

to

to x* o en W M en

o 4- O

0 Z l •e* CO 1 to to

enen S-

o

o o c* o O

0

*ff

o

rt S *

o ff

i en W

n.

H-

M

t-" 8. S M

to CO VO oo w en 4- en

o Z 1 en 1 en l 1 o 0 VD O 0

•O 1 J *

Possible extension of

ano. 22 .

to

o CO oo s: en ^. en

o en i oo l VO M M

en t

o ffA S-

VO o o ^J o o IS \Q

U

j

I to g tr z

j? S

Q,

Q,

K to

(T

i--

ro

O* (

D (D

8-8 C^

f~^"

pj

*H

-M

0

t-ti

Q.

b

O

L

.^. ^

i

VO

.d 0 S en

co 4- O o en l Co CO 1 M vo

CO

CO

*

en e

n

JS.

M o

o o l l

^Q v

JQ

O (

D If g

f *"

Oj {S*

o

*— i*

3 O J H to

H- 0

t—1

-

(P

*^

H-

O en

D I — '

J'

9-*-

co Xi 0 S CO t-* 4- 0

0 en i to to 1 CO 1 1 l-1

o O o I 1 gsc

H- Cn

&D

- (D

0)

- rt i-" Weak

conductivit

y. Depe

on geology. ?i

ro

t— ' Xi

•C^ s: CO 4- O en i to CO 1 K-

f—*

f*- 5

en t 1 l F" 3

K

R {S

H-(T

) tO

\J

Qw

. y Possible

ext sion

of

ano. Mg Depend

s on diamond dril

results recommended on

ano. 13.

M"

N..

l—"

VO O s: M 1—

'to 4- O

O en l to eo i P~J to 1 1 to

o o .c* o o j

3 r^

5 iQ

vQ

j) *

tr Shape of

a IJr

contuctor in

depth .

Direction

not certain.

be

explained

by a

trench

,

T ff

NJ

I—" en o VD 4- o O en i M IO 1 M O M

CON

J

O O O VO Oo to

S

rt Q

ro

"" 2- M

^T

t-h (D

Depends on geological i

formation.

Better on L. 70

W.

D 1

NJ

l—1

to N) S M 4- o

o en i M 1 to -0 1 1 o 0 en en 0 Contac rt

Possible con

tor between no. 13

and 14 . pi

\ffo

o Extension of ano.ll. Ve

good

conductivity on L.

294 E. To be drilled-

M k*-

M

M CO *. W M en 4- o

o Z l ^ . 1 -j M

tOO

rt

enoo

M o o

o o en o O li 5! ri CO

O

Men

cJs

- O

w ?-

In ' ^

ro ^ |sr O 3

i-h 0

5 gs s (St —

'

to to oo to W M

VO

VO 4- o 0 Z 1 -j , i^i M 1 1 N/

to O o J* o o II &J

H*lo

w b

GO (

D h~

*

p^i

rt* r

^

R '

Possible extension of a

no. 13

D O

ro

rv\p

no.

ANOr

iALY

LINE

STAT

ION

2C

i. s

r1

* K

s z,rT

MHO

S -,,

DEPT

H S

L;

LENG

TH

S jiAZ

IMUT

H 0 M

^ rt

MAGN

ETIC

ASSO

CIATIO

N

73

73 ft RECOMMENDATIO

NS

PRIO

RITY

o CI re* M

1 1

-to .C

t

U)

yo Ji. 1-"

en

(ji

0 Z 1 to .

1 1 1 1 1 o

Direction

not

certain.

Weak.

Needs

to

be

detailec

moire

south-east.

LO

to Ul

l-'

CD K 165+

00 N i u

jC

D to en

CTl

.C

t

0 M to O

O U) S

h^

jf^.

fhi-*

n-

CD r

t

W ft

"s H* i

*- J

?M

B)

SK

TJ o a

en

hW

H

-

H*

0?ro

a ss rt

0

S"

3fc to to t -

MAP

N

O.

AN

OflA

LY

LIN

E

STAT

ION

I.

1,

0.

55

c-T

MHO

S

DEPT

H

LENG

TH

i AZIM

UTH

* m * 3: * * -n

jjjP

N

lin JU

l

o ji 0

0 3M

AGN

ETIC

A

SS

OC

IATI

ON

70

30.

RECOMMENDATIONS

PR

IOR

ITY

o

o M

D.D.H. RECOMENDED

(WORK RECOMMENDED)

&RJD ANOMALY

2

8

10

11

13

14

16

19

20

22

23

LINE

292+80 E

295+00 E

354+00 E

294+00 E

40+00 W

406+00 E

418+00 E

STATION

191+80 N

197+00 N

158+00 N

194+50 N

65+50 S

162+00 N

167+00 N

AZIMUTH

156 0

1560

2100

156 0

1800

210 0

2100

DIP

500

500

50 0

50

500

50 0 ^

50 0

LENGTH

400'

600 '

600'

600'

600'

400'

400'

NOTE

Line 250 E should be surveyedHas to be detailed more

southward before drilling

With a trench, we may explain this anomaly

Detail required before drilling

PRIORITY

1

2

1 '

1

1 i

1

1

1

1

1

LIST OF CLAIMS

HEENAN S MARION

Licence

554667 to 554679 incl.

554685 to 554705 incl.

549613 to 549615 incl.

554017 to 554022 incl.

553222 to 553239 incl.

568516 to 568518 incl.555037 to 555040 incl.

628434 to 628445 incl.

619128 to 619132 incl.

536791 to 536793 incl.536851 to 536852 incl.

536782

624001 to 624003 incl.

622299 to 622300 incl.

634522 to 634523 incl.

549240 to 549242 incl.

554500 to 554519 incl.

536916 to 536922 incl.

554011 to 554016 incl.

583862 to 583873 incl.

583876 to 583886 incl.

J.QWNSI1.LPS

Townshi

HeenanHeenanHeenanHeenanMarion

Marion

Marion

MarionMarion

Marion

Marion

Marion

Marion

Marion

Marion

Marion

Marion

Ma r i on

Marion

Marion

Geona

GEO LA LTEEl' H V S l O H ll o ("l l l) li l

GEO LA LTtEPHYSIQUE L O G l Q U E

EXPLORATION - SERVICES

STATEMENT FOR ASSESSMENT WORK

I, the undersigned, Clermont Lavoie, for Geo!a Limited, certify to the following.

A horizontal loop electromagnetic survey (34,0 km) was carried out over a property owned by Falconbridge Nickel Mines Limited during the period of October 12 to Novembre l, 1982.

The property covered by the survey ik includes the claims listed at the end of this report.

H.E.M. instrument: Apex Maxmin IIFrequencies: 888 and 3,555 Hz. Cable: 400 feet Sensitivity: U.

Operators:

(21 days) Andre" Tessier 398, Murdoch Rouyn, Quebec

(21 days) Jean-Paul Cloutier R.R. #1 D'Alembert, Quebec

Respe/ffully submitted,

Clermont Lavoie, Ph.D.

•l

1020, 3e AVENUE EST (ROUTE 117 SUD), C.P. 418, VAL D'OR (QUEBEC) J9P 4P4 T6I.: (819) 825-8212

GEO LA LTtEPHYSIQUE L O G l Q U E

EXPLORATION - SERVICES

CERTIFICATE

I, the. undersigned, Clermont Lavoie, residing at 1148 Girard Avenue, Vat d'Or, Quebec, graduated with a B .Se.A. degree in Geology faom Ecole. Poly- technique in 1 965. I have, obtained a M .Sc.A degree in Geophy&icA from Ecole Polytechnique in 1973, and received a Ph.D. in Geophy&icA firom McGill

in 1972.

2. I am a membet oj( the. OtudeA. o 6 Engine.eAA o6 Quebec, the. Canadian ILn&tituute. o^ Mining and Metallurgy, the. Quebec P/ioApeatoA^ AiiocxAtcon and the. Society 0(5 Exploration Gwphy&ici&ti*,

3. I do no* ho&f, nor do I expect io leeetve, an0(5 am/ .kind in thue. claim held by FALCOWBRItJGE WICKEL MIWES LIMITED------- - - -------- - ---——— ———no-'i in any otheA mining claim* the.y may have..

4. The. interpretation and re.comme.ndatioM de^cribe^ in re.port are. faaied partly on a personal and technical experience, in tlii* di&trict o (J Quebec.

Signed in Val d'Or, thi* fourteenth (14th) day o (J the month 0 (5 December, one -tlioa&and nine hundred and eighty-

avox.e, Ph.V.

low, msl' :,p. 418, VAL D'OR IQUEBEO J9P4P4 T6i.: (819) 825-8212

•41016SWee04 2 .7756 MARION 900

Mining Lands Section

Control Sheet

File No J, 7 75L

TYPE OF SURVEY ^ GEOPHYSICAL

____ GEOLOGICAL

____ GEOCHEMICAL

EXPENDITURE

MINING LANDS COMMENTS:

Signature of Assessor

Date

1985 05 08 Your File:30/85 Our File: 2.7766

Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources60 Wilson AvenueTimmins, OntarioP4N 237

Dear Sir:

RE: Notice of Intent dated April 17, 1985 Geophysical (Electromagnetic) Survey on Mining Claims P 536782, et al, In Henan-MaHon Townships4;..^...^.^-1 1^ ^.^...^......^.^^^^

The assessment work credits, as listed with the above-mentioned Notice of Intent, have been approved as of the above date.

Please Inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so Indicate on your records.

Yours sincerely,

S.E. YundtDI rectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416)965-4888

S. Hurst:mc

cc: Falconbridge LtdTimmins, OntarioAttention: Barry Manchuk

cc: Geo La LteeVal d'Or, Quebec

cc: Mr. G.HJ.FergusonMining A Lands CommissionerToronto, Ontario

cc: Resident GeologistTimmins, Ontario

Encl.

Ministry of Natural

•ources

Technical Assessment Work Credits Date

1985 04 17

File2.7756

Mining Recorder's Report of Work^o. 3QX85

Recorded Holder

FALCONBRIDGE LTDTownship or Area

HENAN-MARION TOWNSHIPS

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

Geophysical

Other Hays

Section 77 (19) See "Mining Clslmi Aitasud" column

Geological days

Geochemical rfiys

Man days D Airborne C

Special provision H Ground 03

Dt Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

D Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claims Assessed

P 536782-91-93 536851-52 549240-41-42 553224-25-27-32-33-38 554500-01-02-03-05 554666-67-69-70 554686-87-89-90-91-92-94-95-99 554700 555037 to 040 inclusive 619128-29-30 628434 to 442 inclusive

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

LJ not sufficiently covered by the survey LX) Insufficient technical data filed

P 536792

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical — 80; Geological — 40; Geochemical — 40; Section 77(19)—60:929 I

itario

Ministry ofNaturalResources

1985 04 17 Your File: 30/85 Our File: 2.7756

i-)

Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources60 Wilson AvenueTimmins, OntarioP4N 2S7Dear Sir:

Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Intent with statements listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed for a technical survey. Please forward one copy to the recorded holder of the claims and retain the other. In approximately fifteen days from the above date, a final letter of approval of these credits will be sent to you. On receipt of the approval letter, you may then change the work entries on the claim record sheets.For further information, if required, please contact Mr. R.J. Pichette at 416/965-4888.

Yours sincerely,

E. Yundt Director Land Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3S. Hurst:mc

Encls.cc: Falconbridge Ltd

167 Wilson AvenueTimmins, OntarioP4N 2T2Attention: Barry Manchuk

cc: Geo La Ltee1020, 3e Avenue EstClermont LauoieC.P. 131Val d'Or, Quebec J9C 4N9

cc: Mr (J.H. FergusonMining l Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario

845

Ministry ofNaturalResources

Ontario

Notice of Intent

for Technical Reports

1985 04 17

2.7756/30/85

An examination of your survey report indicates that the requirements of The Ontario Mining Act have not been fully met to warrant maximum assessment work credits. This notice is merely a warning that you will not be allowed the number of assessment work days credits that you expected and also that in approximately 15 days from the above date, the mining recorder will be authorized to change the entries on his record sheets to agree with the enclosed statement. Please note that until such time as the recorder actually changes the entry on the record sheet, the status of the claim remains unchanged.

If you are of the opinion that these changes by the mining recorder will jeopardize your claims, you may during the next fifteen days apply to the Mining and Lands Commissioner for an extension of time. Abstracts should be sent with your application.

If the reduced rate of credits does not jeopardize the status of the claims then you need not seek relief from the Mining and Lands Commissioner and this Notice of Intent may be disregarded.

If your survey was submitted and assessed under the "Special Provision-Performance and Coverage" method and you are of the-opinion that a re-appraisal under the "Man-days" method would result in the approval of a greater number of days credit per claim, you may, within the said fifteen day period, submit assessment work breakdowns listing the employees names, addresses and the dates and hours they worked. The new work breakdowns should be submitted direct to the Land Management Branch, Toronto. The report will be re-assessed and a new statement of credits based on actual days worked will be issued.

646 (83/6)

Ontario v

Ministryor Report of WorkResources (Geophysical, Geological,

Geochemical and Expenditures)

Mining Act

Instructions: Please type or print.— If number of mining claims traversed

exceeds space on this form, attach a list,Note: — Only days credits calculated in the

"Expenditures" section may be enteredin the "Expend. Days Cr," columns.

- Do not use shaded areas below.*e of SurvcyU)

"Claim Holder (i)~

t~. i-t~~.~ t j

Township or Area

C. oAddress

Prospector's Licence No

Survey Company

G-e. o / . A t^-T E.Z/9 O S -.

'J T^

Name and Address pf Author (of Geo Technical report) ( L fc. f

O U

Total Miles of line CutDate of Survey (from Si to)

J-^Y-L Mo. l Yr. j Day J Mp. | Vr. | 'Previous

H cnJT L- * UO l E

f i?- Sun) C-P. /3ICredits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter totalls) here

)

Geophysical

^/~- E lectromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

i Days per Claim

!-- O

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Days per Claim

Airborne C redits

Note: S pecial provisions Electromagnetic credits do not applyto Airborne Surveys. Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence) P ^ o)

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)",..^.Type of Work Performed ^,* ^ ^ ^ i \' '

Performed on C*aim(sV r^\

Vtvi' ^

Calculation of Expendituri Difyi Credit*' , ,\ '' 1-' '•"l '- "'

Total Expenditures \ 0. " "'

S ^ 1

\ N i u ^\so^|\

Total Days Credits

5 =Instructions

Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

Mining ClaimPrefix Number

//-C/

Expend. Days Cr.

Mining ClaimPrefix Number

Expend. Days Cr.

Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.

For Office Use OnlyTotal Days Cr. Date Recorded Record

Date

- 7 7Retjfiyseci Holder or,^?gent IS^gnaiurel

ifaJD(Certification Verifying Report of Work

l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

o' Person

~11 H A/fate Certified

t// -

ir h h A r ?'l t' h 3? 1ot*h -J y 9 /P i' A 4 1- ? JH'l'-tt 7//.;/** t' ?

A FA- -U" ? o ? i b i v t, r l b l 7/St-/' t ' 9c? A o ei? e(, f a C ? .f

A -1?.*.-

A J?,*?

A -^-C

^ O C /, C C'

•j -f .c; A-c-t'

j? s r ?j?.cj b r r t" p. c3

T:' t f f. f Sl. T: ??f-?

i :-' t' T T' '-" ...fA ir f s" v j" -

^ z o o o ^46 -7 A. ? .f

-CVj "7 A^ A /, 9 A S .C1

C?/,

h? J?

A' .9 .C1

It-'? (*h ff

Qbl' kfr f

i;' 5 x ir j?

l s t ?rj?r^ L i s '.r

J?

1985 02 06 Your File: Our FI Mf 2.7756

Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources60 Wilson AvenueTimmins, OntarioP4N 2S7

Dear Sir:

He received reports and maps on January 31* 1985 for a Geophysical (Electromagnetic) Survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) on Mining Claims P 636782 et al in the Townships of Heenan, Marion and Geona.

This material will be examined and assessed and astatement of assessment work credits will be Issued.

We do not have a copy of the report of work which 1s normally filed with you prior to the submission of this technical data. Please forward a copy as soon as possible.

Yours sincerely,

3.1. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block. Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416)965-6918

A. Barrisc

cc: Falconbridge Limited P.O. Box 40 Commerce Court West Toronto, Ontario MSL 1B4

cc: Falconbridge Limited l67nH11son Avenue Timmins, Ontario P4K 2T2

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

File.

f TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORT l FACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT [TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Survey(s) Township or Area

Claim Holdcr(s)

A)TS y/a/K

Survey Company_

Author of Report.

Address of Author JGA.

Covering Dates of

/S? l f i

!fc. /h- 6. X/a.

Total Miles of Line Cut

---;-inecutting to office^

r* &S

///S/'^Z

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.

ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

~, , . ,GeophysicalDAYS

per claim

—Magnetometer—Radiometric

—O ther —————

GeologicalGeochemical

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do riot apply to airborne surveys)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric(enter days per claim)

DATE:

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

(prefix) (number)

Res. Geol.^. __Qualifications_C* . 3 't* ^

Previous Surveys File No. Date Claim Holder

l

TOTAL CLAIMS.

IND

UCE

D P

OLA

RIZ

ATI

ON

RES

ISTI

VIT

YG

RA

VIT

YEL

ECTR

OM

AG

NET

ICM

AG

NET

ICP

7 ^

? h-

Electrode

array .

Electrode

spacing —

Tvne of

electrode

'

? ?

S !

l s

s s

' 1

r i

2- o-

:

q.

T n

s ^

g ?

?ra

ET

- 3

orq

^

r^

--

oS

r 3

3 c

o' 3 r* 3 o

1 t!

-j^

c 3 D?^

!?

B?

••g

Q

O

•B c

-Z

•^

n)

ra

3

3

O

Ov

^

v^ D o g K 5"

Elevation

accuracy —

Tnctriimnif

to

o W5

r* r-*- o' 3 ET

o ft! 3 1 5' — '

1

Corrections made-

c i; ~ B 3 n —* 3

- -~-l"~"~7 -

Parameters

measured.

Tnstriimnit

1

i

VV

' ^ {

V* } s

? ?

\ I

3 rr

i

~-

*Nf*

\ '*

*\ \ ^D AJ S

-

x fJ"

P-

> (

•J -1 ^ x. S-*

i ^

""',

ft:

y^

3\

~"

"V.

"

1^

IT

) B. Vg VI

— 1

0 "^ "^j

vj^

sjv

\ ^

A•o

D o o t-t- cr

n S s 5' o D K ft: 3'

(T!

fe.

Coil

configuration —-

Coil

senaration 0 X-.

- V)

O

"ft-

^ 1 K

3*

y? -*- 3 3 o 3 ^ ^ •-^

J)

j ^ ^^ ^ ^ N N

/

Accuracy — Scale

con Diurna

l correction

rm Base

Station

check-in

Base

Station

location n;

*^ .

^-t.

c/3

i 3

3

D-

C-

r i - 3

z-

^C

"~-o

*^-^ o c -1 ^^

T^ t -1—4 ! ? 1 •^ ^ • -L * ^s -^ x. C •v

•v

7 L i - ^.

3 2 M 3 r*

O

-I

< K

1

|

0 r? ST -l L ra \ h C \y (7

a: t

s*~

5' cr

\r~

s q

?g

f |

|c'

[2;

\ "

faCi C -"

^ ~

V

3

\ UT*

x a: ~ /-s 1

0i

sP

"0o

|T"

W*

j2

f!

J^D

. i*

*

^-

wS

' ^ Cu

^"

"Xo

^

|- 1

8 p

w o^

*j*

k

*c

o* ri

a;

*™i

'"*

W2.

o

^

>3

"^

o "H

15 50

0

^

ft "*1

*l

*^

era

^O

W

v*

-*"X •it 3* *^ o o "•

v AV.

^ ^\

A

b.

j T

J V^'-5 .3

5" 5'3 ^ 3 ^ c5" 5 Z 2. 2 3

- V 4,6 4- V 4 4 7v t O"

7 oo o 3703^ o 3 "7

6, i "l l 3 o

t* A

t, A ?^ ? i 3 1ijf 6^Fi, ^ p

SELF POTENTIAL

Instrument_________________________________________ Range.Survey Method————^—-————————-—^^-—^^^^————.^——————.—..—.

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRIC

Instrument -———Values measured .

Energy windows (levels)———--—-—.—^--.———^--—--..——.......—^-^—....—.—.-—Height of instrument____________________________Background Count, Size of detector————-—-————————————^^——.^————-——.—.—--—-Overburden .—-^———^^^—..—...-.—.-.——.—.^——^^—^——..—.—.——...——.—..——

(type, depth - include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.)\ Type of survey—————.——-^-—————-—————-——-Instrument .-—^-——————————————.—.—————Accuracy——————.^——.^--—-————.————.———.——Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS

Type of survey(s)——— Instrument(s) —————

(specify for each type of survey) Accuracy——^———————————

(specify for each type of survey) Aircraft used^—^-———.^——^—^—.--———————.————————.

Sensor altitude-Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude_________________________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area__________________________Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY ~ PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material)

Average Sample Weight.—————— Method of Collection-———————

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth———— Terrain—————————

Drainage Development—————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: percent

p. p. m. p.p. b.

nD D

Cu, Pb,

Others_

Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As,-(circle)

Field Analysis (-Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used——

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. —————————-

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis ———-

Extraction Method. Analytical Method . Reagents Used——

Commercial Laboratory (- Name of Laboratory.— Extraction Method—— Analytical Method —— Reagents Used————-

.tests)

.tests)

-tests)

General. General.

SjO

t l

l l

l

Cib

00 O

\\

:\

SO

\\

i

V,

OQ

lv Lv

00

\\

\\\

\\\

\\

So"

v si:

-4.

r~i

3,0

4*

'

GEOP

HYSIC

AL L

EGEN

D

ELEC

TROM

AGNE

TIC S

URVE

Y

-f H 30

'

of

possib

le

conducto

r

Co

nd

uct

or

axe

Co

nd

uct

or

axe

po

ssib

le

Co

nd

uct

ivity

- T

hic

kne

ss

in

mh

os

De

ep

Pro

file

s

E.M

.H.

In-

Phqie

O

ut-

of-

Ph

qj*

In-P

ho

iS—

.\;V

Out

-o(-

Phai*

AR

EA

O

F S

UR

VE

YLO

CAT

ION

M

AP

FA

LC

ON

BR

IDG

E

LIM

ITE

D

L lnst

:MA

XM

IN

MFr

e'q:

88

8 H

z

GEOL

A LT

EEj.P

Cto

utier

^

Qfl

EXEC

UTE

PAR:

A

Jts

sie

r O

ct. 8

2

HE

EN

AN

ON

TA

RIO

INTE

RPRE

TE

PAR

C. L

avo

ie

Ph

.D.,

Na

*.8

2

DESS

tNE

PAR

: M

. H

ero

vx

No

v.8

2

EC

HE

LLE

: l"

s 4

00'

O BO

' 20

0'

*00'

60

0'

80

0N

TS

. :

4 J 0/6

PLA

N

No

: 8

2-1

30

-O J

4101

6SW

0084

2

.77

56

M

AR

ION

200

r

GEOP

HYSIC

AL L

EGEN

D

ELEC

TROM

AGNE

TIC S

URVE

Y

Are

a of p

ossi

ble

cond

ucto

r

—y—

C

ondu

ctor

axe

~~~X

T C

ondu

ctor

ax

o po

ssib

le

15

Con

duct

ivity

- Thi

ckne

ss

in

mho

s30

'

Pro

files

E

-M, H

.

Ph

oi*

O

ul-

of-

Ph

o**

In-P

ha

s*-

*!

——

'

l M

••H

fc

ir

fr

AREA OF SURVEY

LOCATION MAP

POUR

: FA

LCO

NB

RID

GE

LI

MIT

ED

LEV

E:

lnst

:MA

XM

IN

11 Fr

e'q:

88

8 Hz

. C

able

:400

'

PAR:

GEO

L A

LTEE

. -

J. P

. CI o

ut iff

•X

ECU

T6

MR

. A

J*sti*r

Ocf-

82

INTE

RPRE

TE

PAR

; C

.Lo

vOl'e

P

hD, ,

No

v.8

2

06SS

INE

PAR

i M.H

erou

x N

ov. 8

2

ApP

tOU

VE

W

R'^

^y^L-U

v fi

REVI

SE

PAR

i

PLA

N

No:

N

.T.5

.: S

2-13

O-O

3 41

O/6

PROJ

ET:

HE

EN

AN

ON

TAR

IO

LAT:

47*

47

' |

LON

G:

829

W^

" fr

*t-

lCt W

1

**

—

4' A

tfS

* -

' L.

. u

,~E

Cn

cLtt

: T

s4U

O0

10

0'

20

ff

*tt

f 6

00

*^0

0'

•:

. "j

. -

J -

i*

- —

-.

-^fc

ir

.--'*-

•-

* •i* '

-••-f

- A .

.'-^

-- ..

. J

. :-:;

i-

/'"j

^•*.^

. ''-

f S

*• •

.4-^

iMM

•" ^

•- "i

' "-

^1

A . ,

-;.^

,'jJ

" -j*B '

i.

--**-t

S.

-. "

-.:^

J

41016SW8004 2.7756 MARION

r

GEOP

HYSI

CAL

LEGE

ND

ELEC

TROM

AGNE

TIC S

URVE

Y

fc—

4101

6SW

00C

K

2.7

75

6

MA

RIO

N2

20

AREA OF SU

RVEY

LOCATION MAP

DES

ROSI

ERS

11 o. t

r

15

30*

of

po

ssib

le

con

du

cto

r

Co

nd

uct

or

axe

Con

duct

or

axe

po

ssib

le

Con

duct

ivity

- Th

ickn

ess

in m

ho

s

Pro

file

s E

M.H

.

Ou

t-o

f-P

ho

*e

1 1h" "

X ;4-

; ••' ^ O

ut -

of-

PK

osi

i,

POUR

FA

LCO

NB

RID

GE

LI

MIT

ED

LEV

E:

InsT

iMA

XM

tN

li Fr

e'q:

355

5 H

z.

PA

R:

GEOL

A LT

EE.

- J.P

CIo

utier

EXEC

UTE

PAR

: A

.Ussie

r O

ct. 82

INTE

HPR

ETE

PAR

C. L

ayo

ff P

hJ)

.,N

o*.

82

DE

SS

INE

PA

R : M

. H

&ow

e N

ov. 8

2

AP

PR

OU

VE

PA

R'- g

t+tt

fitb

m*. vt*

REV

ISE

PAR

-

PLAN

N

o:

82- 1

30-0

2N

T.S

. :

41 O

/6

PRO

JET:

Cab

le: 4

00'

HE

EN

AN

ON

TAR

IO

LAT

: 47

* 4

7'

EC

HE

llE :

0 TO

O'

200'

4

PM

S^H

^—

LONG

: 82

* 21

'

i**

* jif

trt*

-

- — '

X)'

600'

80

0'r

i ' j

. . ,

; '"* f

'1

' -''-

i

J

- -4

.

*^ j

"' 1?

*^c

r

410I6SW0804 2.7756 MARION

230

AREA

OF

SU

RVE

YLO

CAT

ION

M

AP

GEOP

HYSIC

AL L

EGEN

D -

ELEC

TROM

AGNE

TIC S

URVE

Y

Are

a

of p

oss

ible

conduct

or

—fe

- C

ondu

ctor

ax

e

-^r-

C

onduct

or

axe

poss

ible

15

Con

duct

ivity

- Th

ickn

ess

in m

hos

30'

Pro

files

E.M

.H,

In -

P

ho

t*

Ou

t-Q

t-P

.haj

/' '"i' O

ut-

of-

Ptio

sa

50%

= 1

po.

POUR

: FA

LCO

NB

RID

GE

LI

MIT

ED

LEV

E:

lnst

:MA

XM

lN

II F

req:

3555

Hz.

C

able

^QO

'

PA

R:

EXE'C

UTE

PAR:

Aj

f5S

GEOL

A LT

EE

^

Oct

82

P

RO

JE

T:

INTE

RPRE

TS

PAR,

C.la

vo

fe P

kD.,N

o*.8

2 H

EE

NA

N

DE

SS

INE

PA

R -. M

.Hero

ux

No

v.8

?

AP

PR

OU

VE

' P

AR

^^

RE

VtS

fi P

AR

.

PLA

N

No:

82

-130

-O4

1.

——

——

——

47**

l

LAT:

47

*47

' LO

NG

; ^7

* .?

/'

— —

——

——

——

—

ECHE

LLE

; 1"

:400

' N

T, S

.: o

top1

200'

40CL

60

0' ao

o"

^7 O

/6