genetic evaluation of calving traits in us holsteins
DESCRIPTION
Presentation on genetic evaluation of calving traits made to the Department of Animal Science at Louisiana State University in 2007.TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Genetic Evaluation of Calving Traits in US Holsteins](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062418/554e733cb4c9054a698b4c03/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
2007
J.B. ColeJ.B. Cole
Animal Improvement Programs LaboratoryAgricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, [email protected]
Genetic Evaluation of Genetic Evaluation of Calving Traits in US Calving Traits in US
HolsteinsHolsteins
![Page 2: Genetic Evaluation of Calving Traits in US Holsteins](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062418/554e733cb4c9054a698b4c03/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
LSU 2007 – Animal Sciences Seminar (2) Cole 2007
IntroductionIntroduction
National evaluations were introduced for Holstein calving ease (CE) in August 2002 and for stillbirth (SB) in August 2006.
A calving ability index (CA$) which includes SB and calving ease (CE) was developed.
Relationships among calving traits and other diseases are being studied.
![Page 3: Genetic Evaluation of Calving Traits in US Holsteins](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062418/554e733cb4c9054a698b4c03/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
LSU 2007 – Animal Sciences Seminar (3) Cole 2007
Why the concern?Why the concern?
Calving difficulty and stillbirth are expensive (Dematawewa and Berger, 1997; Meyer et al., 2001)
There is concern that rates of dystocia and stillbirth are increasing
Lactations initiated with dystocia have higher risks for other diseases (Cole et al., unpublished data).
![Page 4: Genetic Evaluation of Calving Traits in US Holsteins](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062418/554e733cb4c9054a698b4c03/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
LSU 2007 – Animal Sciences Seminar (4) Cole 2007
How do the evaluations How do the evaluations work?work?
Funded by the National Association of Animal Breeders
Data are collected from multiple sources:• Pedigree from breed associations• Calving data from DRPC
Evaluated using a sire-maternal grandsire threshold model
![Page 5: Genetic Evaluation of Calving Traits in US Holsteins](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062418/554e733cb4c9054a698b4c03/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
LSU 2007 – Animal Sciences Seminar (6) Cole 2007
Calving ease definitionCalving ease definition
Reported on a five-point scale:
1 = No problem
2 = Slight problem
3 = Needed assistance
4 = Considerable force
5 = Extreme difficulty
Scores of 4 and 5 are combined
![Page 6: Genetic Evaluation of Calving Traits in US Holsteins](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062418/554e733cb4c9054a698b4c03/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
LSU 2007 – Animal Sciences Seminar (7) Cole 2007
Stillbirth definitionStillbirth definition
Reported on a three-point scale:
Scores of 2 and 3 are combined
1 = calf born alive,
2 = calf born dead,3 = calf died within 48 h of parturition.
![Page 7: Genetic Evaluation of Calving Traits in US Holsteins](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062418/554e733cb4c9054a698b4c03/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
LSU 2007 – Animal Sciences Seminar (8) Cole 2007
Distribution of SB and CE ScoresDistribution of SB and CE Scores
7,484,309 29,320348,6775,348,0291,758,283Total
96,087 1,27232,19638,92923,6905
207,242 1,74037,851108,03759,6144
633,029 3,35370,522375,203183,9513
738,853 2,53749,858482,720203,7382
5,809,09820,418158,2504,343,1401,287,2901
Total3210
Calv
ing
Ease
Sco
re
Stillbirth Score
![Page 8: Genetic Evaluation of Calving Traits in US Holsteins](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062418/554e733cb4c9054a698b4c03/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
LSU 2007 – Animal Sciences Seminar (9) Cole 2007
Stillbirth records by lactationStillbirth records by lactation
0
100
200
300
400
500
1980 1990 2000
Birth Year
Num
ber
of R
ecor
ds (
thou
sand
s)
3
2
1
![Page 9: Genetic Evaluation of Calving Traits in US Holsteins](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062418/554e733cb4c9054a698b4c03/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
LSU 2007 – Animal Sciences Seminar (10) Cole 2007
Data and editsData and edits 7 million SB records were available
for Holstein cows calving since 1980 Herds needed ≥10 calving records
with SB scores of 2 or 3 for inclusion
Herd-years were required to include ≥20 records
Only single births were used (no twins)
![Page 10: Genetic Evaluation of Calving Traits in US Holsteins](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062418/554e733cb4c9054a698b4c03/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
LSU 2007 – Animal Sciences Seminar (11) Cole 2007
Sire-MGS threshold modelSire-MGS threshold model
Implemented for calving ease (Aug 2002) and stillbirth (Aug 2006)
Sire effects allow for corrective matings in heifers to avoid large calves
MGS effects control against selection for small animals which would have difficulty calving
![Page 11: Genetic Evaluation of Calving Traits in US Holsteins](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062418/554e733cb4c9054a698b4c03/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
LSU 2007 – Animal Sciences Seminar (12) Cole 2007
Genetic evaluation modelGenetic evaluation model
A sire-maternal grandsire (MGS) threshold model was used:• Fixed: year-season, parity-sex, sire
and MGS birth year• Random: herd-year, sire, MGS
(Co)variance components were estimated by Gibbs sampling• Heritabilities are 3.0% (direct) and
6.5% (MGS)
ijklnoprnplonlkjiijklnopr e m s BM BS PS YS hy y ijklnoprnplonlkjiijklnopr e m s BM BS PS YS hy y ijklnoprnplonlkjiijklnopr e m s BM BS PS YS hy y
![Page 12: Genetic Evaluation of Calving Traits in US Holsteins](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062418/554e733cb4c9054a698b4c03/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
LSU 2007 – Animal Sciences Seminar (13) Cole 2007
Trait definitionTrait definition
PTA are expressed as the expected percentage of stillbirths Direct SB measures the effect of
the calf itself Maternal SB measures the effect
of a particular cow (daughter) A base of 8% was used for both
traits: Direct: bulls born 1996–2000 Maternal: bulls born 1991–1995
![Page 13: Genetic Evaluation of Calving Traits in US Holsteins](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062418/554e733cb4c9054a698b4c03/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
LSU 2007 – Animal Sciences Seminar (14) Cole 2007
Phenotypic trend for Phenotypic trend for stillbirthsstillbirths
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
1980
1983
1986
1989
1992
1995
1998
2001
2004
Birth Year
% St
illbi
rth
HeifersCowsAll animals
![Page 14: Genetic Evaluation of Calving Traits in US Holsteins](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062418/554e733cb4c9054a698b4c03/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
LSU 2007 – Animal Sciences Seminar (15) Cole 2007
Genetic trend for stillbirthsGenetic trend for stillbirths
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000Birth Year
%SB
H
Direct
Maternal
![Page 15: Genetic Evaluation of Calving Traits in US Holsteins](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062418/554e733cb4c9054a698b4c03/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
LSU 2007 – Animal Sciences Seminar (16) Cole 2007
Distribution of PTADistribution of PTA
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
%SBH
Perc
ent of
Sco
ress Direct
Maternal
![Page 16: Genetic Evaluation of Calving Traits in US Holsteins](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062418/554e733cb4c9054a698b4c03/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
LSU 2007 – Animal Sciences Seminar (17) Cole 2007
Distribution of reliabilitiesDistribution of reliabilities
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
41-4
5
46-5
0
51-5
5
56-6
0
61-6
5
66-7
0
71-7
5
76-8
0
81-8
5
86-9
0
91-9
5
96-9
9
Reliability
Perc
enta
ge
Direct
Maternal
![Page 17: Genetic Evaluation of Calving Traits in US Holsteins](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062418/554e733cb4c9054a698b4c03/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
LSU 2007 – Animal Sciences Seminar (18) Cole 2007
Dystocia and stillbirthDystocia and stillbirth
Meyer et al. (2001) make a strong argument for the inclusion of dystocia in models for SB
Difficulty of interpretation - formidable educational challenge
Interbull trait harmonization - none of the March 2006 test run participants included dystocia in their models
Changes in sire and MGS solutions on the underlying scale between models were small
![Page 18: Genetic Evaluation of Calving Traits in US Holsteins](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062418/554e733cb4c9054a698b4c03/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
LSU 2007 – Animal Sciences Seminar (19) Cole 2007
Evaluation conclusionsEvaluation conclusions
Reliabilities for SB averaged 45% versus 60% for CE
Phenotypic and genetic trends from 1980 to 2005 were both small
An industry-wide effort is currently underway to improve recording of calf livability
![Page 19: Genetic Evaluation of Calving Traits in US Holsteins](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062418/554e733cb4c9054a698b4c03/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
LSU 2007 – Animal Sciences Seminar (20) Cole 2007
Index dataIndex data Same initial dataset as BV
estimation Calvings with unknown MGS were
eliminated for VCE Records with sire and MGS among
the 2,600 most-frequently appearing bulls were selected
2,083,979 calving records from 5,765 herds and 33,304 herd-years
![Page 20: Genetic Evaluation of Calving Traits in US Holsteins](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062418/554e733cb4c9054a698b4c03/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
LSU 2007 – Animal Sciences Seminar (21) Cole 2007
SamplingSampling Six datasets of Six datasets of ~250,000~250,000 records each records each
were created by randomly sampling were created by randomly sampling herd codes without replacementherd codes without replacement
Datasets ranged from Datasets ranged from 239,192239,192 to to 286,794286,794 observations, and all averaged observations, and all averaged 7%7% stillbirths stillbirths
A common pedigree file was used to A common pedigree file was used to facilitate comparisons between sire facilitate comparisons between sire and MGS solutionsand MGS solutions
![Page 21: Genetic Evaluation of Calving Traits in US Holsteins](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062418/554e733cb4c9054a698b4c03/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
LSU 2007 – Animal Sciences Seminar (22) Cole 2007
HeritabilitiesHeritabilities
Calving Ease (Direct)8.6%
Calving Ease (MGS) 3.6%
Stillbirth (Direct)3.0%
Stillbirth (MGS) 6.5%
![Page 22: Genetic Evaluation of Calving Traits in US Holsteins](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062418/554e733cb4c9054a698b4c03/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
LSU 2007 – Animal Sciences Seminar (23) Cole 2007
Genetic correlations among SB Genetic correlations among SB and CEand CE
Trait
CE SB
DirectMaternal
Direct
Maternal
CEDirect 1.00 0.46 0.67 0.25
Maternal 1.00 0.29 0.63
SBDirect 1.00 0.28
Maternal 1.00
![Page 23: Genetic Evaluation of Calving Traits in US Holsteins](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062418/554e733cb4c9054a698b4c03/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
LSU 2007 – Animal Sciences Seminar (24) Cole 2007
Economic assumptionsEconomic assumptions
Newborn calf value
Expenses per difficult birth (CE ≥4)
$450 for females
$150 for males
$75 labor and veterinary
$100 reduced milk yield
$75 reduced fertility and longevity
1.5% chance of cow death ($1800)
![Page 24: Genetic Evaluation of Calving Traits in US Holsteins](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062418/554e733cb4c9054a698b4c03/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
LSU 2007 – Animal Sciences Seminar (25) Cole 2007
Calving Ability indexCalving Ability index
CA$ has a genetic correlation of 0.85 with the combined direct and maternal CE values in 2003 NM$ and 0.77 with maternal CE in TPI
Calving traits receive 6% of the total emphasis in NM$ (August 2006 revision)
(DCE ) (MCE ) (DSB ) (MSCA$ B ) 4 8 3 8 4 8 8 8
![Page 25: Genetic Evaluation of Calving Traits in US Holsteins](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062418/554e733cb4c9054a698b4c03/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
LSU 2007 – Animal Sciences Seminar (26) Cole 2007
Breeds other than HolsteinBreeds other than Holstein
Brown Swiss economic values are −6 for SCE and −8 for DCE• Separate SB evaluations are
not available• CE values include the
correlated response in SB
Other breeds will be assigned CA$ of 0
![Page 26: Genetic Evaluation of Calving Traits in US Holsteins](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062418/554e733cb4c9054a698b4c03/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
LSU 2007 – Animal Sciences Seminar (27) Cole 2007
Health and calving traitsHealth and calving traits
Health event data from on-farm computer systems
Events arranged in putative causal order by DIM at first occurrence
Path analysis to determine associations among disorders
Significant associations shown in following tables (P < 0.05)
![Page 27: Genetic Evaluation of Calving Traits in US Holsteins](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062418/554e733cb4c9054a698b4c03/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
LSU 2007 – Animal Sciences Seminar (28) Cole 2007
Health and dystociaHealth and dystocia
Disorder DIM Odds Ratio
Stillbirth 1 39.0
Retained placenta 1 3.8
Mastitis (0—30 d) 6 2.3
Ketosis 11 3.1
Metritis 16 3.9
Reproductive 32 2.3
Displaced abomasum
29 2.2
Respiratory 44 3.0
![Page 28: Genetic Evaluation of Calving Traits in US Holsteins](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062418/554e733cb4c9054a698b4c03/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
LSU 2007 – Animal Sciences Seminar (29) Cole 2007
Health and stillbirthHealth and stillbirth
Disorder DIM Odds Ratio
Retained placenta 1 2.8
Mastitis (0—30 d) 6 2.4
Metritis 16 2.1
Displaced abomasum
30 2.3
Reproductive 32 3.4
Digestive 52 2.8
![Page 29: Genetic Evaluation of Calving Traits in US Holsteins](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062418/554e733cb4c9054a698b4c03/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
LSU 2007 – Animal Sciences Seminar (30) Cole 2007
ConclusionsConclusions A routine evaluation for stillbirth in US
Holsteins was implemented in August 2006 Direct and maternal stillbirth were
included in NM$ for Holsteins starting in August 2006
The US participates in routine Interbull evaluations that began in November 2006
Calving problems increase lifetime health care costs and decrease profitability
![Page 30: Genetic Evaluation of Calving Traits in US Holsteins](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062418/554e733cb4c9054a698b4c03/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
LSU 2007 – Animal Sciences Seminar (31) Cole 2007
AcknowledgmentsAcknowledgments
Jeff Berger, Iowa State University John Clay, Dairy Records
Management Systems Ignacy Misztal and Shogo
Tsuruta, University of Georgia National Association of Animal
Breeders