gde: progress report barry barish ilcsc report cern 9-feb-06

GDE: Progress Report

Barry BarishILCSC Report

CERN 9-Feb-06

7-Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 2

Global Design Effort

– The Mission of the GDE • Produce a design for the ILC that includes a

detailed design concept, performance assessments, reliable international costing, an industrialization plan , siting analysis, as well as detector concepts and scope.

• Coordinate worldwide prioritized proposal driven R & D efforts (to demonstrate and improve the performance, reduce the costs, attain the required reliability, etc.)


The GDE after ~6 Months

• How have we done?– We are on track – BCD produced by end of 2005

as promised. It will provide a sound basis for entering into a reference design effort, globally coordinate R&D program, begin industrialization, determine costs, etc. next year

• What’s Next?– Undertaking Design/Cost effort toward Reference

Design Report (RDR)– Assessing present R&D program to begin to

provide global guidance in the future.


Baseline Configuration Document

• Our ‘Deliverable’ by the end of 2005

• A structured electronic document– Documentation (reports, drawings etc)– Technical specs.– Parameter tables


Structure of the BCD

Summary-like overview for those who want to understand the choice and the why

Technical documentation of the baseline, for engineers and acc. phys. making studies towards RDR


Alternatives Section(s)

Note ACD is part of the BCD


The Key Decisions

Critical choices: luminosity parameters & gradient


Making Choices – The Tradeoffs

Many decisions are interrelated and require input from several WG/GG groups


From Snowmass to a Baseline

August September October November December

2005Snowmass

WW/GG summaries

Response to list of 40+ decisions

All documented ‘recommendations available on ILC Website (request community feedback)

Review by BCD ECBCD EC publishes‘strawman’ BCD

PublicReview Frascati

GDE meeting

BCD Executive Committee:BarishDugan, Foster, Takasaki Raubenheimer, Yokoya, Walker


GDE Frascati – The BCD Approved

• December 2005

• Finished the BCD

• Organized the GDE and the broader R&D and Design efforts for next year

http://www.linearcollider.org/

BCD

7-Feb-06 GDE Report to ILCSC 11General Layout Plan 500 Gev


Next Goal – Reference Design

• Reorganized the GDE toward Design / Cost Effort • A global effort to design / cost the ILC is

underway and working• Configuration Control; International Costing;

Industrialization; Siting

--------------------------• A sound design must be established with

convincing and affordable costing. • Global R&D program to demonstrate the ILC,

improve over the baseline and reduce costs.


ICFA FALC

FALC Resource Board

ILCSC

GDEDirectorate

GDEExecutive Committee

GlobalR&D Program

RDR Design Matrix

GDER & D Board

GDEChange Control Board

GDEDesign Cost Board

GDE RDR / R&D Organization


ICFA FALC

FALC Resource Board

ILCSC

GDEDirectorate


GlobalR&D Program

RDR Design Matrix

GDER & D Board




Reporting

resourcestechnical


ICFA FALC

FALC Resource Board

ILCSC

GDEDirectorate


GlobalR&D Program

RDR Design Matrix

GDER & D Board




GDE


GDE MembersChris Adolphsen, SLACJean-Luc Baldy, CERNPhilip Bambade, LAL, OrsayBarry Barish, CaltechWilhelm Bialowons, DESYGrahame Blair, Royal HollowayJim Brau, University of OregonKarsten Buesser, DESYElizabeth Clements, FermilabMichael Danilov, ITEPJean-Pierre Delahaye, CERN, Gerald Dugan, Cornell UniversityAtsushi Enomoto, KEKBrian Foster, Oxford UniversityWarren Funk, JLABJie Gao, IHEPTerry Garvey, LAL-IN2P3Hitoshi Hayano, KEKTom Himel, SLACBob Kephart, FermilabEun San Kim, Pohang Acc LabHyoung Suk Kim, Kyungpook Nat’l UnivShane Koscielniak, TRIUMFVic Kuchler, FermilabLutz Lilje, DESY

Tom Markiewicz, SLACDavid Miller, Univ College of LondonShekhar Mishra, FermilabYouhei Morita, KEKAlex Mueller, LAL - OrsayHasan Padamsee, Cornell UniversityCarlo Pagani, DESYNan Phinney, SLACDieter Proch, DESYPantaleo Raimondi, INFNTor Raubenheimer, SLACFrancois Richard, LAL-IN2P3Perrine Royole-Degieux, GDE/LALKenji Saito, KEKDaniel Schulte, CERNTetsuo Shidara, KEKSasha Skrinsky, Budker InstituteFumihiko Takasaki, KEKLaurent Jean Tavian, CERNNobu Toge, KEKNick Walker, DESYAndy Wolski, LBLHitoshi Yamamoto, Tohoku UnivKaoru Yokoya, KEK

49 members

New MembersMarc Ross (SLAC)Bill Willis (Columbia)Andre Seryi (SLAC)John Sheppard (SLAC)Ewan Patterson (SLAC)Peter Garbincius (Fermilab)Maseo Kuriki (KEK)Kiyoshi Kubo (KEK)Nobuhiro Terunuma (KEK)Norihito Ohuchi (KEK)Susanna Guiducci (INFN)Deepa Angal-Kalinin (CCLRC)

TotalsAmericas 22Europe 23Asia 16


GDE Structure and Organization

• Executive Committee for Baseline Configuration– GDE Director

• Barish

– Regional Directors • Dugan – Americas • Foster – Europe• Takasaki – Asia

– Accelerator Leaders• Yokoya - Asia• Raubenheimer - Americas• Walker - Europe

• Responsible for decisions and documentation for the Baseline Configuration Document (BCD) and RDR

GDEExecutiveCommittee


GDE Structure and Organization

• GDE Groups– Design / Cost Engineers

• Shidara – Asia

• Bialowons – Europe

• Garbincius – Americas

– Siting, Civil Construction and Infrastructure• Baldy - Europe

• Enomoto – Asia

• Kuchler – Amercas

– Physics / Detectors (WWS chairs)• Brau - Americas

• Richard - Europe

• Yamamoto - Asia

– Accelerator Experts (44 GDE members)


GDE Organizational Evolution for RDR

• Selected additions to the GDE following the BCD completion having needed skills in design, engineering, costing, etc

• Change Control Board– The baseline will be put under configuration control and a

Board with a single chair will be created with needed expertise.

• Design / Cost Board– A GDE Board with single chair will be established to

coordinate the reference design effort, including coordinating the overall model for implementing the baseline ILC, coordinating the design tasks, costing, etc.

• R&D Board– A GDE Board will be created to evaluate, prioritize and

coordinate the R&D program in support of the baseline and alternatives with a single chair


Change Control Board (CCB) Nobu Toge (chair)

Markiewicz US

Mishra US

Funk US

Kubo Asia

Kuriki Asia

Pagani EU

Blair EU

Schulte EU


Design Cost Board (DCB) Peter Garbincius (chair)

Phinney US

Paterson US

Kephart US

Enomoto Asia

Shidara Asia

Terunuma Asia

Bialowons EU

Delahaye EU

Mueller EU


Global R&D Board (RDB) Bill Willis (chair)

Padamsee US

Himel US

Wolski US

Hayano Asia

Higo Asia

Elsen EU

Lilje EU

Garvey EU

Damerell EU


Approach to ILC R&D Program

• Proposal-driven R&D in support of the baseline design. – Technical developments, demonstration experiments,

industrialization, etc.

• Proposal-driven R&D in support of alternatives to the baseline– Proposals for potential improvements to the baseline,

resources required, time scale, etc.

• Develop a prioritized DETECTOR R&D program aimed at technical developments needed to reach combined design performance goals


ICFA FALC

FALC Resource Board

ILCSC

GDEDirectorate


GlobalR&D Program

RDR Design Matrix

GDER & D Board




ILCDesignEffort

ILCR&D

Program


Request for

Sample Site Information

To be used to study siting issues, in advance of a call for “expressions of interest” to host the ILC


How and when to involve industry?

• Large Scale Project Characterization– Large Project Management– Precision Engineering– International Coordination– Costing

• Industrialization– Civil Construction & Infrastructure– Cryogenics– Superconducting RF structures, couplers, etc– Electronics and Control Systems– Large Scale Computing


From Baseline to a RDR

Jan July Dec

2006

Freeze ConfigurationOrganize for RDR

Bangalore

Review Design/Cost Methodology

Review InitialDesign / Cost Review Final

Design / CostRDR Document

Design and Costing ReleaseRDR

Frascati Vancouver Valencia


Program

Morning Afternoon Evening May 19 Arrival, registration Rest May 20 Introduction I & II Sources;

Bunch compressors Tutorial & homework

May 21 Damping ring basics Damping ring design Tutorial & homework May 22 ILC linac basics;

ILC linac beam dynamics Field trip to Kamakura Free time

May 23 High power RF; SRF basics

SRF cavity technology

Tutorial & homework

May 24 ILC cryomodule; Room-temperature RF

Beam delivery; Beam-beam interaction

Tutorial & homework

May 25 Instrumentation & feedback

Conventional facilities; Operations

Tutorial & homework

May 26 (*) Sokendai – KEK KEK tour Free time May 27 (*) Detectors;

Physics ATF; Site visit to ATF

Free time

May 28 Departure

• An 8-day program for a complete education in linear colliders

• 6 days of lectures on accelerators at Sokendai

• 2 days at KEK to see and touch the real thing

• Total of 21 lectures covering both basic and advanced accelerator topics

• Emphasis on ILC but also including CLIC


• All 21 lecturers confirmed• A team of first-class experts

in the field• Good mixture of young and

senior physicists• Good geographical

distribution in the three regions: Asia – America – Europe = 7–7–7

• Good balance among various institutions, including CERN, DESY, INFN, KEK, PAL, Tohoku Univ., SLAC, LBL, JLab and Fermilab

• Overwhelming responses from around the world

• No. of students to take: 80 • Applications received: 400 • Application deadline: Feb 15• A tough job to select students• Preference given to applicants

from HEP countries• A small number given to

exceptional applicants from non-HEP countries

• Selection based on applicant’s CV and one recommendation letter

Lecturers Students


• All students will receive financial aid for attending the school, including travel

• North America: A total of US$70k received from DOE, Fermilab and SLAC

for students and lecturers from North America• Asia:

Expecting US$70-80k (equiv.) from JSPS for students and lecturers from Asia

KEK to cover local expenses (meeting rooms, A/V, school supplies, computers, local transportation, etc.)

• Europe: The “Big Five” (CERN, DESY, INFN, PPARC, IN2P3) will

support their students and lecturers But we need money for supporting European students who

are not from these laboratories

Funding


• Baseline Configuration Complete

• GDE Reorganized for RDR effort

• Design effort should be fully underway by Bangalore

• Design / Cost documented in RDR by 2007

• Beginning process of guiding Global R&D Effort

• Linear Collider Accelerator School looks promising

Conclusions

gde: progress report barry barish ilcsc report cern 9-feb-06

Documents

gde report

bcd slide

ilcsc10 gde frascati

rdr slide

reference design report

gev slide

walker slide

design efforts