gb analyze and improve roadmap

8/4/2019 GB Analyze and Improve Roadmap

1/26

Analyse Requirements

Module 2 deliverables

1


2/26

Main Effect

Affinity Diagram

2

Analyze


3/26

Organize the Causes

Method 1 Cause Relations

Analyze


4/26

Cause Relations

Main Header

RootCause

MainIssue 1

RootCause

RootCause

MainIssue 2

MainIssue 3

Main Issues (Primary causes) are with the most arrows going IN.A arrow is linked from the primary causes to the centre.

The root cause/s are those that have the most arrows going OUT

Analyze


5/26

Organize the Causes

Method 2 Fault Tree Analysis

Analyze


6/26

Minimum 3 levels of Causes.

First level is from Affinity diagram (Brainstorming)

For Causes with more than 3 levels,

start from the back to find the

Cause Failure - Effect

First: Brainstorm freely.

(Do not start with FTA)

Second: Affinity diagram

Third: Arrange First level causes in FTA

Analyze


7/26

Root Causes

The cause/s are developed further by doing aFault Tree Analysis (FTA).

Root Causes

Potential X

Analyze


8/26

Visualize the Causes

Method 1 Ishikawa Diagram

Analyze


9/26

Ishikawa Diagram

A useful tool for visualizing root causes is theIshikawa (fishbone) diagram.

There are a variety of ways to use it.

It is primarily a tool for organizing informationto establish and clarify the relationships

between an effect and its main causes.

CAUSES

Problem

StatementEFFECT

Analyze


10/26

Ishikawa Diagram

The Ishikawa diagram identifies the potential

root cause(s) of the problem so that collective

actions can be taken to eliminate their

recurrence.

It assists in reaching a common understanding

of the problem and exposes the potential

drivers of the problem.

Analyze


11/26

Ishikawa analysis

Primary

Level 2

Level 3

Level 4

Level 5

Header

The Ishikawa starts with taking the causes already listed.Each set of causes is linked and diagnosed to reach 5 levels

of analysis wherever possible. A primary cause alone is not acceptable

Analyze


12/26

Complete Ishikawa analysis

Potential XOR

Top Occurrence

Header1

1

1.1

1.1.1

Header2

Header3

Header

4

Header

5

Header

6

1.2

1.2.1

This is ROOTcause

Analyze


13/26

Select the Main Root Causes

Method 1

Constant, Noise, Experimental (CNX)

Analyze


14/26

Constant, Noise, Experiment

Causes CNX Details Possible SolutionHeader

Analyze


15/26

Show quick wins

Insert KaizenActivity (if any)

15

Analyze


16/26

Analyse Requirements

Module 3 deliverables

16

A l


17/26

Sample Data Collection

Based on each ME, sample data iscollected for each root cause.

For example:

ME 1 Discrete or Continuous

Root Causes Type of Data

RC 1 Continuous/Discrete

RC 2

17

Analyze

A l


18/26

Discrete

Continuous

Discrete Continuous

ME

RC

1. Pareto2. Test for proportions3. ANOVA4. Main Effects Plot

1. Test for proportions2. ANOVA3. Chi Sq (Categories

Only)

18

1. Test for Means2. Test for Variances3. Correlation4. Regression

1. Test for Means2. Test for Variances3. Correlation

4. Regression5. ANOVA

Analyze

A l


19/26

19

Confirm main root causes

Main Effect Main Root Causes

ME 1 RC 1

RC 2

RC 3

RC 4

RC 5

ME 2 etc RC 1 etc

Analyze

A l


20/26

20

I Invention

AAdd Value

M Maximize available resources

W Win Win

I Integrated

S

Savings

E Extensive

Possible innovative solutions criteria

The Search light for Creative and Innovative solutions

I - InventionThe solution derived through the process of thinking (PDCA/DMAIC) is new to theorganization. It is a first attempt by anyone or group. The idea may have beeninspired by developments and applications in technology outside the organization.It is an invention, when the team or circle modifies, customizes or improves onideas from external sources. The key concern is that the method, product orprocess is new to the organization.

A Add ValueThe solution eliminates or reduces physical strain and effort in creating a methodor product that impact on desired output. The new value is derived when physical,bodily movements and strain are replaced by knowledge-based work, relievesfatigue and physical concentration in obtaining the desired output.

M Maximize use of available resources

The technologies in use to produce the output and the resources available theorganization are used differently. More is obtained from the mix of resources thatgo into making the desired product or service.

WWin-Win results for the StakeholdersThe stakeholders benefit from the new solution. The customers, suppliers,public/community, organization and team/circle members obtain tangible andintangible benefits from the solution.

I IntegratedThe solution compliments and adds value to other processes, systems, andmethods in use in the organization. The solution positively reinforces thestandards of performance in other work processes and methods.

S SavingsThe solution saves time, money and resources. Peoples skills and performance isupgraded and the effort and energy is diverted to learning and continuousimprovement activities.

E ExtensiveThe application of the solution i s extended to other organizations, departments andwork places. The solution becomes a benchmark for others in the industry andenables the transfer of the new technology to other environments. Theorganization achieves the best practice ideals.

Analyze


21/26

A l


22/26

Project: MAIN EFFECT 1

Date:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Output Variables(Y's)

Invention Add ValueMaximizeAvailableResources

WIN-WIN Integrated Savings Extensive

Output Rating 1to 10

0.5 1.5 1 1 2 3 1

Input Variables(X's)

Association Table Rating %

ME 1 RC1SOLUTION A

0 0.00

ME 1 RC1SOLUTION B

0 0.00

ME 1 RC1

SOLUTION C

0 0.00

0 0.00

ME 1 RC2SOLUTION A

0 0.00

ME 1 RC2SOLUTION B

0 0.00

ME 1 RC2SOLUTION C

0 0.00

XY Matrix I AM WISE

22

Analyze

A l


23/26

Project: MAIN EFFECT 1

Date:

1 2 3 4 5

Output Variables (Y's) CCR 1 CCR 2 CCR 3 CCR 4 CCR 5

Output Rating 1 to 10 2 3 1 2 2

Input Variables (X's) Association Table Rating %

ME 1 RC1 SELECTEDSOLUTION

0 0.00

0 0.00


0 0.00

0 0.00


0 0.00

0 0.00


0 0.00

0 0.00

Validation of Selected Solutions

23

Analyze

Analyze


24/26

Force Field Analysis

24

Analyze

Analyze


25/26

PDPC

Process

PositiveDecision

Process

PositiveDecision

DecisionDecision Decision

Negative Negative

25

Analyze

Analyze


26/26

Solution Implementation plan

Gantt chart

26

Analyze

gb analyze and improve roadmap

Documents