gas barrier and biodegradable properties of poly(l-lactide) nanocomposites compounded with...
TRANSCRIPT
ORIGINAL PAPER
Gas Barrier and Biodegradable Properties of Poly(L-lactide)Nanocomposites Compounded with Polyhedral OligomericSilsesquioxane Grafted Organic Montmorillonite
Qifang Li • Dan Bi • Guang-Xin Chen
� Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014
Abstract A novel organic montmorillonite (OMMT) was
prepared by reacting the aminopropyllsobutyl polyhedral
oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) with the OMMT that
had already been modified by cationic surfactants. The
layer spacing of OMMT increased from 1.68 to 3.43 nm
after being intercalated by POSS. Poly(L-lactide) (PLLA)
based nanocomposites with montmorillonites were pro-
duced by melt compounding. The PLLA nanocomposites
with POSS modified OMMT were comprised of a random
dispersion of intercalated/exfoliated aggregates of layered
silicates throughout the PLLA matrix. The incorporation of
POSS modified OMMT resulted in a significant increase in
decomposition temperature for 5 % weight loss in com-
parison with the virgin PLLA. Gas permeation analysis
showed that the increase of the montmorillonite concen-
tration in the polymer matrix led to an expected decrease in
permeation values. Gas barrier properties of the nano-
composites were compared with those predicted by phe-
nomenological models such as the Nielsen model and
Cussler model. Incorporation of the POSS on OMMT
improved significantly mechanical properties of PLLA.
The biodegradability of the neat PLLA and corresponding
nanocomposite was studied under compost, and the rate of
biodegradation of PLLA increased after nanocomposite
preparation.
Keywords Montmorillonite � Polyhedral oligomeric
silsesquioxane � Poly(L-lactide) � Nanocomposites
Introduction
Over the past decade, organic/inorganic nanohybrid is a
subject of great interest because it offers unique hybrid
properties difficult to obtain from individual components.
Of particular interest among different organic/inorganic
nanohybrids are polymer/layered silicate nanocomposites,
which constitute a relatively new class of materials that has
attracted growing scientific and technological interest due
to their unique properties, which make them candidates for
a number of potential applications [1–4]. Montmorillonite
is one of the most commonly used layered silicates in
polymer nanocomposites, due to its low cost, high surface
area, high aspect ratio, and low toxicity [5]. With a charged
nuture, pristine montmorillonites are hydrophilic and thus
incompatible with hydrophobic polymers, and it is neces-
sary to reduce the polarity in order to enhance their com-
patibility with most polymer matrixes. Therefore, the two
main objectives of surface modification on montmorillonite
are: (1) to expand the interlayer space, allowing large
polymer molecules to enter into the montmorillonite gal-
leries, and (2) to improve the miscibility of montmoril-
lonite with polymers to achieve a good dispersion of
layered structure within the polymer matrix [6]. At present,
montmorillonite surfaces are often treated with surfactants
containing long alkyl chains that help to expand the
interlayer space of the montmorillonites to facilitate their
exfoliation in polymers [7].
Polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) reagents,
monomers, and polymers are emerging as a new chemical
technology for nano-reinforced organic–inorganic hybrids
Q. Li � D. Bi � G.-X. Chen (&)
Key Laboratory of Carbon Fiber and Functional Polymers,
Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Chemical
Technology, Beijing 100029, People’s Republic of China
e-mail: [email protected]
Q. Li
College of Material Science and Engineering, Beijing University
of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, People’s Republic of
China
123
J Polym Environ
DOI 10.1007/s10924-014-0653-z
[8, 9] and the polymers incorporating POSS monomers are
becoming the focus of many studies [10, 11] in view of
their excellent mechanical properties, thermal stability,
simplicity in processing and flame retardation etc. Typical
POSS monomers possess the structure of cube-octameric
frameworks with eight organic corner groups, one or more
of which are reactive or polymerizable. The POSS cage is
thermally stable, and its bulkiness may help the expansion
of the montmorillonite interlayer space so that the amount
of such hybrid surfactants required to achieve a large
expansion of the interlayer space may be fairly small. Also,
POSS can be used as the intercalating agents of layered
silicates to prepare nanocomposites combining the two
types of nanoreinforcement agents [12]. Some POSS-
modified montmorillonites have been prepared in recent
years with the aim to be dispersed into polymers to yield
polymer/montmorillonite nanocomposites. These studies
were principally motivated by the high thermal stability of
POSS that allows the POSS-modified montmorillonite
minerals to withstand the high temperatures required for
processing some thermoplastics. The high thermal stability
of POSS has to be compared with the onset temperature
around 170–190 �C of nonoxidative decomposition of
alkyl quaternary ammonium salts [13]. POSS ammonium
surfactants with isooctyl substituents were used to prepare
polypropylene/montmorillonite [14] and poly (butylene
terephthalate)/montmorillonite [15] nanocomposites.
In most studies on POSS modified montmorillonites,
POSS is used as a substitute for onium ions in montmo-
rillonite modification. The POSS derivatives containing
short alkyl chains with amine groups behave like a sur-
factant and the POSS modified montmorillonites are syn-
thesized via ion-exchange reaction. Although POSS-based
surfactants hold sound promise in lessening the degrada-
tion, there is also a great concern that the inherent tendency
for POSS compounds to aggregate or crystallize [16, 17]
may hinder the exfoliation of POSS-modified clay in
polymer matrices, thus limiting the properties of the
nanocomposites.
In our previous research, we introduced the concept of
‘‘twice functionalization’’ to modify the montmorillonite,
with organic agent to swell the montmorillonite and func-
tional agent to react with the polymer matrix to further
improve the interfacial interaction [18–22]. In present
work, we present the synthesis of POSS modified organic
montmorillonites (OMMTs) that had already been modified
by cationic surfactants and thereafter, the POSS-modified
organic montmorillonite (POMMT) was employed to pre-
pare the nanocomposites of poly(L-lactide) (PLLA). By
using some extending range of mathematical models, we
investigate the improved barrier properties of the nano-
composite barrier membranes in relation to the large sur-
face area and high aspect ratio of the montmorillonite, so as
to identify both the benefits and limitations of nanocom-
posite barrier materials.
Experimental
Materials
The OMMT, I.24TL-montmorillonite, was purchased from
Nanocor Co., USA, and was purified by dissolution in
ethanol at 70 �C for 4 h to remove any contaminants. The
structure of the organic modifier is HOOC–(CH2)17–NH3?.
The POSS used to modify OMMT was commercial pro-
ducts, e.g. aminopropyllsobutyl POSS (APB-POSS), pur-
chased from Hybrid Plastic Co. USA. The PLLA was
manufactured by Weihua Co. (Shenzhen, China) with a
weight-average molecular weight of 2.4 9 105. All of
reagents (purity [ 99.5 %) were purchased from Beijing
Chemical Factory and used as received.
Preparation of POMMT
The typical procedure of preparing POMMT is described as
follows: the mixture of I.24TL-montmorillonite (5 g) and
excess thionyl chloride was heated and stirred vigorously
in an oil bath with reflux at 80 �C for 24 h. The product
was then filtered and repeatedly washed with hexane at
room temperature to obtain the acyl-chloride functional-
ized OMMT (OMMT-COCl), a kind of gray powder. Then
the OMMT-COCl was mixed with 10 g of APB-POSS and
excess re-steamed THF. The mixture was heated and stir-
red vigorously in an oil bath with reflux at 75 �C for 24 h,
then filtered and repeatedly washed with re-steamed THF
to yield the POMMT. The POMMT was dried in a vacuum
oven at 50 �C for 24 h in order to remove the residual
solvents. The chemical reaction between the OMMT and
APB-POSS is shown below:
J Polym Environ
123
Preparation of PLLA Based Nanocomposites
The nanocomposites of the PLLA/montmorillonites were
prepared by melt compounding PLLA with montmorillo-
nites, using HAAKE torque rheometer at 190 �C under
60 rpm for 5 min. The resulting products were hot pressed
at 190 �C for 1 min under 4 atm to prepare sheets with a
thickness of approximately 0.5 mm which were then
quickly cooled prior to various characterizations.
Characterization
The morphology of the nanocomposites was analyzed by TEM
(JEOL 2000FX) with an acceleration voltage of 120 kV. All
the ultrathin sections (\100 nm) were microtomed with a
Super Nova 655001 instrument (Leica, Switzerland) with a
diamond knife and were then subjected to TEM observation
without staining. The basal spacings of the montmorillonites
and the PLLA/montmorillonites nanocomposites were mea-
sured with an X-ray diffractometer (Brucker AXS, D8) with
CuKa radiation at 45 kV and 50 mA. The diffraction patterns
were collected in the range 1�\2h\10� at a scanning rate of
1�/min-1. Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed
on a Setaram TGA 92 Thermobalance, by heating the samples
at 10 �C/min from ambient temperature to 900 �C under
nitrogen atmosphere.
Gas permeability of pure PLLA and PLLA/montmoril-
lonite nanocomposites was measured in an automatic
tightness tester which was homemade according to the
standard of ISO 2782. Ultra high purity nitrogen was used
for purging and analyses. The film specimens were cut into
a circular shape with a diameter of 8 cm, and then tested at
40 �C and under 0.57 MPa. The membranes were placed in
a stainless steel cell with chambers of known volume on
each side. The nitrogen permeation rate was then calcu-
lated by multiplying the measured transmission rate by the
average sample thickness. Each sample was measured at
five points oriented in a cross pattern over the testing area,
and the results were averaged. To confirm the reproduc-
ibility of the data, more than one sample was used to test
the nanocomposites systems. The permeation rates of the
film specimens were evaluated by using the following
formula:
P ¼ Vðm3Þ � dðmÞsðm2Þ � tðsÞ � pðPaÞ ð1Þ
where V is the volume of the penetrated gas, d is the
thickness of the film specimen, s is the area of the pene-
trated gas, t is the time of penetration, p is the differential
pressure of both sides of the film.
Dumbbell-shaped tensile specimens were prepared from
the hot pressed sheets of PLLA/OMMT and PLLA/APB-
POMMT as well as PLLA. The specimens were subjected
to uniaxial elongation at room temperature. All experi-
ments were carried out with a UTM, Hounsfield test
equipment at a cross head speed of 20 mm/min.
Animal fodder was used as the substrate in composting
process. The composition of fiber, fat and protein in the
animal fodder was similar to food garbage. The composting
process lasted about 1 month. All the samples were pow-
dered at a cryogenic condition for the biodegradation test.
Biodegradation of the nanocomposites was conducted in
the laboratory-scale compost according to ASTM D5209-
92 and ASTM D5338-92. The air flow rate was controlled
at 40 ml/min. A mixture of mature compost (200 g, wet
weight) and the plastics (5 %, on a dry basis) was intro-
duced and incubated at 58 �C. The moisture content of the
compost was maintained at 65 %. CO2 produced from the
compost was absorbed by a 0.4 N potassium hydroxide and
2 N barium chloride mixture solution, and was quantified
by titrating the solution with 0.2 N HCl.
Results and Discussion
Morphology and Structure
Figure 1 shows the FT-IR spectra of OMMT and APB-
POMMT. It can be perceived from Fig. 1 that the peak at
1,112 cm-1, which is assigned to the stretching of Si–O–Si
from POSS cage, confirming the chemical reaction
between the APB-POSS monomers with the end carboxyl
groups of OMMT.
Figure 2 shows the XRD patterns of the OMMT and the
POMMTs. Bragg equation is used to calculate the d (001)
spacing values of the samples and characterize the layered
4000 3000 2000 1000
(b)
Wave number (cm-1)
(a) OMMT(b) APB-POMMT
(a)
Fig. 1 FT-IR spectra of the OMMT and the APB-POMMT
J Polym Environ
123
structure of the POMMTs. As shown in Fig. 2, the
d-spacing of the OMMT was expanded from 1.68 to
3.43 nm after being modified by APB-POSS, indicating
that the APB-POSS was grafted to the organic modifier and
hence the intercalation between the OMMT layers.
The XRD patterns of the PLLA nanocomposites with
2 wt% of OMMT and APB-POMMT are shown in Fig. 3
where the peak appearing at 2h = 3.92� reveals the for-
mation of partially intercalated nanocomposites by 2 wt%
of OMMT (d spacing = 2.25 nm). However, a complete
disappearance of the reflection peak was observed in the
PLLA nanocomposite with 2 wt% of APB-POMMT,
which indicates a disordered structure, but does not provide
enough evidence whether the montmorillonite platelets
were fully exfoliated and evenly dispersed throughout the
PLLA matrix. Apart from measuring the d spacing by
XRD, TEM is required to determine the actual distribution
of platelets within the polymer matrix, so as to complete
characterizing the formation of the nanocomposite.
TEM analysis allows direct visualization of the mor-
phology and dispersion of the nanoparticles and platelets
within the polymer matrix. Figure 4 shows the TEM ima-
ges of the microstructures of the PLLA/OMMT and PLLA/
APB-POMMT nanocomposites, where the dark line rep-
resents individual silicate layers and the brighter area
stands for the PLLA matrix. Figure 4a shows that the
OMMT layers do not fill the full volume, suggesting that
the platelet tactoids of the OMMT were dispersed in the
PLLA matrix at a sub-micro-sized scale. A close obser-
vation of an area of platelet tactoid reveals the individual
platelets of montmorillonite clearly separated by the
polymer matrix. The measured distance between the two
adjacent lines, i.e., the interlayer spacing of the intercalated
tactoids (about 2.2 nm), obtained from the TEM observa-
tions, is consistent with that from the XRD data (2h is
about 4� shown in Fig. 3). In contrast, TEM image of
PLLA/APB-POMMT shown in Fig. 4b demonstrates the
presence of individual layers as well as a few packets of
silicate consisting of about two layers. Therefore, a higher
degree of exfoliation of the silicate layers is obtained for
the PLLA/APB-POMMT nanocomposite than for the
PLLA/OMMT nanocomposite. This is consistent with the
fact that the XRD pattern of the PLLA/APB-POMMT is
absent. The absence of the XRD peak in Fig. 3b attributed
to the higher interlayer spacing of APB-POMMT and the
enhanced interaction between the organic modifier of APB-
POMMT and the PLLA chains. TEM micrograph shows
that the APB-POMMT resulted in better dispersion and
exfoliation in the PLLA matrix compared with the OMMT.
2θ (ο)
APB-POMMT
OMMT
MMT
2 4 6 8 10
10 20 30 40
Si Si
Si Si
Si Si
Si Si
O
O
O
OO
O
OO O
OO
O
NH 2
2θ ((ο)
APB-POSS
Fig. 2 XRD patterns of the MMT, OMMT, APB-POMMT and APB-
POSS
2 4 6 8 10
(b)
2θ (o)
(a) PLLA/OMMT(b) PLLA/APB-POMMT
(a)
Fig. 3 XRD patterns of the PLLA nanocomposites with a 2 wt% of
OMMT and b 2 wt% APB-POMMT
J Polym Environ
123
Thermal Properties
Figure 5 shows the thermal degradation behavior of the
OMMT, POMMT and POSS in nitrogen. The slower
weight loss of POSS compared with OMMT and POMMT
before 250 �C is observed. Two decomposition steps for
the OMMT (Fig. 5a) are attributed to the decomposition of
physically absorbed water and water molecules around the
exchangeable sites in the OMMT before 200 �C and the
dehydroxylation of the structure water of the OMMT
between 525 and 700 �C, respectively [23, 24]. The ther-
mal degradation between 200 and 525 �C is attributed to
the decomposition of attached organic surfactant on the
surface of OMMT. The APB-POMMT exhibits thermal
stability in nitrogen which is about 72 �C higher than the
OMMT. The embedding of the APB-POMMT leads to a
remarkable thermal stabilization of the molecular
compound. The decomposition peak appears at about
443 �C is mainly due to the decomposition of the POSS
bounded surfactant, which caused a relatively high phase-
transformation temperature compared with the free sur-
factant. The higher thermal stability of the APB-POMMT
than the OMMT maybe lies in the rigidity of the molecular
structure of the bounded POSS. The OMMTs with high
decomposition temperature is very important for the melt
compounding process of polymer nanocomposites as the
processing temperatures for most engineering plastics are
around 200 �C. The low decomposition temperatures of
OMMTs would lead to the degradation of the surfactants
during the processing [25].
Figure 6 shows the TGA curves of PLLA and its
nanocomposites. Both of the PLLA/montmorillonite
nanocomposites display higher decomposition tempera-
tures than that of the virgin PLLA. The nanocomposite
prepared from the APB-POMMT displays a 32.5 �C
increase in the decomposition temperature for 5 % weight
loss, and the PLLA/OMMT nanocomposite 21.1 �C,
compared with the virgin PLLA. Therefore, the PLLA/
APB-POMMT nanocomposite is the most thermally stable
one among these three samples. The thermal stability of the
polymer/montmorillonite nanocomposites can be affected
by polymer matrix, fillers, and the interaction between
them. Such behaviour was explained by the decomposition
temperature of montmorillonites and the relative extent of
exfoliation. Indeed, the enhanced decomposition tempera-
ture of APB-POMMT and the exfoliated individual plate-
lets together increased the thermal stability of the
nanocomposites [26].
Gas Permeation
Figure 7 shows the effect of the concentration of the APB-
POMMT in the PLLA nanocomposites on gas permeability.
Fig. 4 TEM images of a PLLA/OMMT and b PLLA/APB-POMMT
nanocomposites. The content of the montmorillonites was 2 wt%
200 400 600 8000
20
40
60
80
100
50 100 150 200 250 30090
92
94
96
98
100
102
104
c
Wei
ght L
oss
(%)
Temperature (°C)
ab
c
(a) OMMT(b) APB-POMMT(c) APB-POSS
Wei
ght L
oss
(%)
Temperature (°C)
a
b
Fig. 5 TGA traces of a OMMT, b APB-POMMT and c APB-POSS
J Polym Environ
123
As seen in Fig. 7, increasing the montmorillonite concen-
tration in the polymer matrix leads to an expected decrease
in permeation values. For example, the N2 permeation
obtained for the pristine PLLA membrane is
0.593 9 10-17 m2s-1 Pa-1, and the addition of 10 wt%
APB-POMMT in the matrix decreases the N2 permeation
value to 0.203 9 10-17 m2s-1 Pa-1. This represents a 66 %
decrease in permeability in comparison with the pristine
polymer sample. It has been known that the exfoliated
morphology increases the effective surface area of the
montmorillonite in the matrix, and consequently increases
the tortuous pathway for the permeating gas molecules.
These results suggest that the APB-POSS increases the
dispersion of OMMT particles in the PLLA matrix sub-
stantially, which in turn generates more tortuous pathways
for permeating gas molecules. At low organoclay loadings,
tactoids are surrounded by significant quantities of neat
polymer, and while the platelets themselves are able to slow
permeating species, the surrounding polymer nevertheless
allows for substantial permeation. As the organoclay content
is increased, the tactoids begin to overlap more and more
significantly, forming a layered structure with the polymer
dispersed throughout, which contributes more effectively to
the tortuous path effect that is often credited as the main
source of the improvement seen with the addition of
nanoclays [27].
A number of models have been applied to describe the
permeation behavior of nanolayer-based nanocomposites.
They are based on ideal conditions, such as complete ex-
foliation of the flake platelets, perfect alignment of the
flakes in a perpendicular direction to the flow of the per-
meating molecules [28], and the assumption that the type
of polymer used as the matrix has no effect on the effective
ration of permeabilities. The mathematical representation
of the Nielsen model and the Cussler model are presented
in Table 1, where, P and P0 are the permeabilities of the
composite film and the pristine polymer, respectively, U is
the volume fraction of the filler and a is the aspect ratio of
half the width to the thickness of the impermeable flakes.
These models can predict the ratio of the permeation of the
200 250 300 350 4000
20
40
60
80
100
(c)(b)
Wei
ght L
oss
(%)
Temperature (°C)
(a) PLLA(b) PLLA/OMMT(c) PLLA/APB-POMMT
(a)
Fig. 6 TGA curves of the PLLA and the PLLA/montmorillonite
nanocomposites under a nitrogen atmosphere. The content of the
montmorillonites was 2 wt%
0% 2% 5% 10%0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
Perm
eabi
lity
coef
fici
ent P
(m
2s-1
Pa-1
)*10
-17
APB-POMMT Loading (wt%)
Fig. 7 Effect of the APB-POMMT concentration in its PLLA
nanocomposites on gas permeability of N2
Table 1 Published formulas for the barrier models
Model Formulas Array/orientation
(cross-section)
Nielsen [31] P0(1-U)/
P = 1?aU/2
Regular array, oriented
Cussler-random
array [32]
P0(1-U)/
P = (1 ? aU/3)2Random array, oriented
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.200.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
a=20
a=10
P/P
0
Volume Faction (φ)
a=4
Fig. 8 Nielsen phenomenological model plot of N2 permeability
J Polym Environ
123
pristine polymer to that of the nanocomposite membrane as
a function of montmorillonite content and aspect ratio. All
of the models use aspect ratio as an adjustable parameter
and the results can be seen in Figs. 8 and 9. At the same
time, all of the experimental gas permeation data obtained
from the pristine PLLA and the PLLA/APB-POMMT
nanocomposites are shown in Figs. 8 and 9 for fitting.
As shown in Figs. 8 and 9, the models are able to match
the data over at least some part of the composition range
explored here. In particular, Fig. 9 shows N2 permeation
data fitted with the Cussler model (Cussler-random array).
The adjusted aspect ratio, a, obtained by fitting N2 per-
meation of the samples was about ten. One likely reason
for the discrepancies observed, however, is that while the
models account for platelet aspect ratio, they do not
account for platelet orientation and instead assume perfect
alignment perpendicular to the direction of gas flow.
Biodegradability and Mechanical Properties
The biodegradability of PLLA and its nanocomposites was
investigated by the weight loss in the compost. The weight
changes of the PLLA/montmorillonite nanocomposites in
the compost at 58 �C are shown in Fig. 10. Obviously, the
biodegradability of PLLA is significantly enhanced after
nanocomposite preparation with both OMMT and APB-
POMMT. At the same time, weight changes of nanocom-
posites increase with increasing time and the PLLA/APB-
POMMT nanocomposite showed a higher weitht change
than that of PLLA/OMMT sample.
The degradation of biodegradable polyester in compost
is a complex process involving four main phenomena,
namely, water absorption, ester cleavage and formation of
oligomer fragments, solubilization of oligomer fragments,
and finally diffusion of soluble oligomers by bacteria.
Therefore, the factor that increases the hydrolysis tendency
of PLLA ultimately controls the degradation of PLLA [29].
As reported by M. Okamoto et al. [30] the presence of
terminal hydroxylated edge groups of the silicate layers is
one of the responsible factors for the degradation.
Compared with the PLLA/APB-POMMT and PLLA/
OMMT nanocomposites, the exfoliated and intercalated
silicate layers in former case are dispersed much more
homogeneous than that of latter one in the PLLA matrix
(from TEM image), indicating the absorbed water is also
homogeneously dispersed in PLLA/APB-POMMT. When
the hydroxyl groups start heterogeneous hydrolysis of the
PLLA matrix after absorbing water from compost, the
degree of hydrolysis of PLLA/APB-POMMT is higher than
that of PLLA/OMMT. This is the reason why PLLA/APB-
POMMT showed a greater degradation from compost than
that of PLLA/OMMT.
The improved mechanical properties are expected to be
the result of a higher degree of exfoliation. According to
Table 2, the addition of OMMT to PLLA increased the
tensile modulus, which suggests that OMMT acted as
reinforcing filler due to its high aspect ratio and platelet
structure. However, the tensile strength and particularly the
elongation at break of the PLLA/OMMT nanocomposites
decreases precipitously as the OMMT content is increased.
The enhancement of the tensile modulus of the PLLA/
APB-POMMT nanocomposites is more prominent than
those with OMMT. Table 2 demonstrates that not only the
tensile modulus but also tensile strength of the PLLA/APB-
POMMT nanocomposites increased as the APB-POMMT
content is increased to 10 wt%. The higher degree of ex-
foliation and the improved tensile properties of the PLLA/
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.200.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
a=20
a=10
a=4
P/P
0
Volume Faction (φ)
Fig. 9 Cussler phenomenological model plot of N2 permeability
(Cussler-random array)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
PLLA PLLA/OMMT PLLA/APB-POMMT
Bio
degr
adat
ion
(wt%
)
Composting time (days)
Fig. 10 Biodegradation of a PLLA, b PLLA/OMMT, and c PLLA/
APB-POMMT nanocomposites
J Polym Environ
123
APB-POMMT nanocomposites are believed to be associ-
ated with the enhanced interaction between the APB-
POMMT and the PLLA.
Conclusions
A method was successfully developed to prepare POSS
modified OMMT, where the amino-POSS was grafted to
the carboxyl-ended surfactant in the gallery of OMMT. The
incorporation of 2 wt% of APB-POMMT into the PLLA
resulted in a significant increase of the thermal stability.
Gas permeation analysis showed that increasing the
montmorillonite concentration in the polymer matrix lea-
ded to a decrease in permeation values. The exfoliation of
the APB-POMMT to the PLLA matrix provided a 66 %
decrease in gas permeability of up to 10 wt% montmoril-
lonite for N2 in comparison with the pristine PLLA. Phe-
nomenological models of effective gas permeabilities in
nanocomposites, such as the Nielsen model and the Cussler
model, though able to fit the experimental data, are still too
idealized to explain the influence of aspect ratio on effec-
tive permeabilities of the PLLA/OMMT nanocomposites.
The rate of biodegradation of PLLA under compost
increased after nanocomposite preparation and the PLLA/
APB-POMMT showed a greater degradation from compost
than that of PLLA/OMMT. The tensile modulus and
strength of PLLA/APB-POMMT were much higher than
those of PLLA/OMMT. Increased interfacial interaction
between APB-POMMT and PLLA was thought to be
responsible for the higher degree of exfoliation of the
montmorillonite platelets and in turn for the enhanced
mechanical properties.
Acknowledgments The authors gratefully acknowledge financial
support of this work coming from Natural Science Foundation of
China (NSFC) (No. 51173009).
References
1. Chiu C-W, Lin J–J (2012) Prog Polym Sci 37:406–444
2. Shikinaka K, Aizawa K, Fujii N, Osada Y, Tokita M, Watanabe J
et al (2010) Langmuir 26:12493–12495
3. Haraguchi K, Li H-j, Ren H-y, Zhu M (2010) Macromolecules
43:9848–9853
4. Priolo MA, Gamboa D, Holder KM, Grunlan JC (2010) Nano
Lett 10:4970–4974
5. Heinz H, Vaia RA, Krishnamoorti R, Farmer BL (2007) Chem
Mater 19:59–68
6. Zhao F, Wan C, Bao X, Kandasubramanian B (2009) J Colloid
Interface Sci 333:164–170
7. Bergaya F, Lagaly G (2001) Appl Clay Sci 19:1–3
8. Lichtenhan JD, Vu NQ, Carter JA, Gilman JW, Feher FJ (1993)
Macromolecules 26:2141–2142
9. Lichtenhan JD, Otonari YA, Carr MJ (1995) Macromolecules
28:8435–8437
10. Chen G-X, Si L, Lu P, Li Q (2012) J Appl Polym Sci
125:3929–3935
11. Song J, Zhao J, Ding Y, Chen G, Sun X, Sun D et al (2012) J
Appl Polym Sci 124:3334–3340
12. Liu H, Zhang W, Zheng S (2005) Polymer 46:157–165
13. Xie W, Gao Z, Liu K, Pan W-P, Vaia R, Hunter D et al (2001)
Thermochim Acta 367–368:339–350
14. Zhao F, Wan CY, Bao XJ, Kandasubramanian B (2009) J Colloid
Interface Sci 333:164–170
15. Wan CY, Zhao F, Bao XJ, Kandasubramanian B, Duggan M
(2008) J Phys Chem B 112:11915–11922
16. Abad MJ, Barral L, Fasce DP, Williams RJJ (2003) Macromol-
ecules 36:3128–3135
17. Chan ER, Zhang X, Lee C-Y, Neurock M, Glotzer SC (2005)
Macromolecules 38:6168–6180
18. Chen GX, Choi JB, Yoon JS (2005) Macromol Rapid Commun
26:183–187
19. Chen GX, Kim HS, Shim JH, Yoon JS (2005) Macromolecules
38:3738–3744
20. Chen GX, Yoon JS (2005) Macromol Rapid Commun
26:899–904
21. Chen GX, Kim HS, Yoon JS (2007) Polym Int 56:1159–1165
22. Li Q, Yoon J-S, Chen G-X (2011) J Polym Environ 19:59–68
23. Tiwari RR, Khilar KC, Natarajan U (2008) Appl Clay Sci
38:203–208
24. Vazquez A, Lopez M, Kortaberria G, Martin L, Mondragon I
(2008) Appl Clay Sci 41:24–36
25. Wan C, Bao X, Zhao F, Kandasubramanian B, Duggan MP
(2008) J Appl Polym Sci 110:550–557
26. Chen GX, Yoon JS (2005) Polym Degrad Stab 88:206–212
27. Dunkerley E, Schmidt D (2010) Macromolecules 43:10536–10544
28. Bharadwaj RK, Mehrabi AR, Hamilton C, Trujillo C, Murga M,
Fan R et al (2002) Polymer 43:3699–3705
29. Lunt J (1998) Polym Degrad Stab 59:145–152
30. Sinha Ray S, Okamoto K, Yamada K, Okamoto M (2002) Nano
Lett 2:423–425
31. Nielsen LE (1967) J Macromol Sci: Part A-Chem 1:929–942
32. Lape NK, Nuxoll EE, Cussler EL (2004) J Membr Sci 236:29–37
Table 2 Tesile properties of pure PLLA and its nanocomposites
Samples Modulus
(MPa)
Elongation at
break (%)
Strength
(MPa)
PLLA 1,506.5 5.5 48.7
PLLA/OMMT-2 % 1,598.6 3.4 47.8
PLLA/OMMT-5 % 1,755.2 2.1 39.3
PLLA/OMMT-10 % 1,904.1 1.2 35.5
PLLA/APB-POMMT-2 % 1,675.9 5.3 52.4
PLLA/APB-POMMT-5 % 1,912.5 4.9 56.8
PLLA/APB-POMMT-10 % 2,186.8 4.1 58.7
J Polym Environ
123