garcia v scientology - plaintiffs motion for protective order (jul2013)

47
7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013) http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 1/47 Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60 Filed 07/26/13 Page 1 of 4 PageID 1536 UN I T ED ST A T ES  D I ST R I C T C OU RT MI D DL E D I ST R I CT  OF FL OR I D A T A M PA  DI V ISI ON L UI S GA RCI A SAZ,  and  wi f e ,  MA RIA DEL ROCI O  GA RCI A , Ca se No.  8: 13 -CV -220 -T27  TBM Plai nt if fs, vs . C HU RC H  OF SC I EN T OL OG Y  RE L I G I OU S TRUS T ;  U.S.  I AS MEMBERS  TRUST; C HU RC H  OF SC I EN T OL OGF LA G SER V I CE ORGANI ZA TION , I NC.;  CHURCH OF SCI EN T OL OG Y FL A G  SH I P SERV I CE ORGA NI ZATI O N, I NC.  d/ b / a  Maje s t ic  Crui se L i nes, D ef en dant s. / - i PLA INT I FF S, M O T ION FO R P RO T E CT IV E O RDE R RE G A RD IN G D E FE NDA NT S,  R EQ UE ST  F O R  PRO D UC T ION  P UR SUA NT T O  EX H IB IT  A  OF  DE FENDA NT S,  F L A G  A N D  SH IP SUB PO EN A DUCES T ECU M COMES  NOW the P lai n ti f f s,  LUI S  GARCI A an d  ROCI O  GARCI A ,  b y and th ro u gh  th ei r  u nd ersi gn ed  atto rn eys  and  i l e  a Mo ti o n  fo r Protec ti ve  O rd er  o bjec ti n g to  th e p ro d uc ti o n  o f  d o cu men ts  req u ested  in  m ultip l e  s u bpo en as  d u c es  tec u m  ( th e  " S ub o enas " )  i ssu ed b y  Defen d an ts  Ch urc h  o f  Sc i en to l o g y  F l ag  Ser vi c e  O rgani z ati o n ,  In c.  an d  Ch urc h  o f  Sc i en tol o g y Fla g  S h i p  Servi c e  O rg an i zati o n, In c.  (" De f end an ts )" .  Th e  do c u m en t  requ es ts  i ssu ed  b y Defend ants,  as  set fo rth  i n  E xhi bi t  A to  th e Su bp o en as,  are i d enti c a l ,  and  impermissi b l y  seek the sweep i n g p ro d ucti o n  o f  do cum en ts  b y  (i )  th e  sep arate  law f i rms  rep resen ti n g P l ai n ti f fs,  (i i ) i n di vi d ual  co unsel  with i n  those law f i rms;  an d  (ii i )  n o n- party  Mi c hael  Rind er .  Bec aus e th e do c um en t  requ ests  are p aten tl y  o verbro ad  an d  u nd u l y  b u rd en so m e,  P l ai nti f fs  object,  on th ei r o wn 1

Upload: anonlover

Post on 14-Apr-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 1/47

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60 Filed 07/26/13 Page 1 of 4 PageID 1536

UN ITED STATES D ISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE D ISTRICT  OF FLORIDA

TAMPA  D IV ISION

LUIS GARCIA SAZ , and wife , MARIA DELROCIO GARCIA ,  Case No. 8:13-CV-220-T27 TBM

Plaintiffs,

vs .

CHURCH  OF SCIENTOLOGY  REL IG IOUS

TRUST ; U.S. IAS MEMBERS  TRUST;

CHURCH  OF SCIENTOLOGY FLAG SERV ICE

ORGANIZATION , INC.; CHURCH OFSC IENTOLOGY FLAG  SH IP SERV ICE

ORGANIZATION , INC . d/b/a Majestic Cruise

L ines,

Defendants.

/- i

PLAINT IFFS, MOT ION  FOR  PROTECT IVE ORDER

REGARDING DEFENDANTS, REQUEST  FOR  PRODUCTION  PURSUANT

TO  EXH IBIT  A  OF  DEFENDANTS, FLAG  AND  SH IP SUBPOENA

DUCES TECUM

COMES NOW the Plaintiffs, LUIS GARCIA and ROCIO GARCIA , by and

through their undersigned attorneys and i le a Motion for Protective Order objecting to the

production of  documents requested in multip le subpoenas duces tecum  (the "Suboenas") issued

by Defendants Church of  Scientology Flag Service Organization , Inc. and Church of  Scientology

Flag Ship Service Organization,  Inc.  ("Defendants)" . The document requests  issued by

Defendants, as set forth in Exhibit A to the Subpoenas, are identical, and impermissibly seek the

sweeping production of  docum ents by (i) the separate law firms representing Plaintiffs, (ii)

individual counsel within those law firms; and (ii i) non-party Michael Rinder . Because the

document requests are patently overbroad and unduly burdensome, Plaintiffs object, on their own

1

Page 2: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 2/47

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60 Filed 07/26/13 Page 2 of 4 PageID 1537

beha lves and on behalf of  each of  the recipients of  the Subpoenas, to the production sought by

the Subpoenas.1 (True and correct cop ies of  the Subpoenas are attached as Composite Exhibit A.)

Defendants purport to serve the Subpoenas in order to obtain discovery rdaiting to its

motion to disqualify all three law firms representing Plaintiffs in this action. The motion to

disqualify is premised on the contention that the law firms of Babbitt Johnson Osborne &

LeClainche and Weil Quaranta McGovern received con fidential  information  from Gray

Robinson,s representation of Defendants over ten years ago. Yet Defendants, motion is now

being used in an attempt to discover every communication among counsel relating to this suit for

fraud against  the Church of Scientology Defendants, including all communications with non-

party individuals named in these subpoenas . The document requests - catching in their net

irrelevant and privileged communications among attorneys and their clients and their lega l

consultants - are indefensibly overbroad.

As a preliminary matter, before permitting discovery, the Court shou ld determine

whether a conflict of interest even ex ists as a result of M r . Johnson,s past represen tation of  FSO

under Rule 4-1.9. This is particularly compelling in this case as Defendants do not allege that

Mr. Johnson  (i) ever represented Defendants  in connection  with this fraud suit by the Garcias,

(ii) knew of  the Garcias when he represented FSO over ten years ago , or (iii) has any confidential

information about this case. Rather, Defendants allege that Mr. Johnson's past representation of

Defendants on general matters, somehow, makes this  case substantially related ! prior

representation. Before requiring Plaintiffs  to file a privilege  log de tailing all privileged

1 FSO has served the Subpoenas on  the separate law firms of  Gray Robinson, P.A ., Babbitt,

Johnson, Osborne & Le Clainche, P .A ., and Weil Quaranta McGovern, P.A . FSO also served the

Subpoenas on the individual a:torneys within those separate firms  , namely, Robert Johison,

Richard Zabak , Theodo re Babbitt, and Ron  Weil . FSO also served the Subpoenas on  non-partyM ichael Rinder .

2

Page 3: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 3/47

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60 Filed 07/26/13 Page 3 of 4 PageID 1538

communications, the Court shou ld make that preliminary determination.  If, in fact, no conflict

exists, communications among the  individuals subpoenaed are not on ly irrelevant and/or

protected rom discovery  pursuant to the doctrines of  work-product and attorney-client privilege,

bu t the ef forts requ ired by Plaintiffs and their counsel which Defendants seek to trigger by the

Subpoenas are unnecessary and , as such, burdensome and harassing .

Dated: July 26, 2013

Respectfully submitted ,

s/ Theodore Babbitt_heodore Babbitt, Esq.

F lorida Bar  No : 091146

Babbitt Johnson Osborne & LeClainche , P.A .

1641 Worthington Road, Suite 100West Palm Beach, FL 33409

T : 561-684-2500

F : 561-684-6308

tedbabbitt@ ,babbitt-i  ohnson .  com

- and  -

Ronald P . Weil , Esq.

Florida Bar No : 169966

Amanda M . M cGovern

Florida Bar No : 964263

Weil Quaranta McGovern, P .A .

Southeast Financial Center, Suite 900

200 South  Biscayne Blvd.M iami , FL 33131

T : 305-372-5352

F : 305-372-5355

RPW@weil law .net

amcgovern@weil law .net

Counsel  for  Plaintiffs Luis A . Garcia Saz and

Maria Del  Rocio Burgos Garcia

3

Page 4: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 4/47

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60 Filed 07/26/13 Page 4 of 4 PageID 1539

CERT IFICATE  OF SERVICE

We hereby certify that, on July 26 , 2013, we electronically filed the foregoing document

with the Clerk of  the Court using CM/ECF. We also certify that the foregoing do cument is being

served this day on all counsel or pro se parties identified below in the manner specified , eithervia transmission of Notices of E lectronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other

authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive electronicallyNotices of  E lectronic Filings .

Nathan M . Berman, Esq.FBN  329230

E-mail : [email protected]

Lee Fugate, Esq.

FBN  170928

E-mail : [email protected]

Jack E. Fernandez, Esq.

FBN  84375 1

E -mail : [email protected]

Mamie V . Wise, Esq.FBN 65570

E-mail: mw [email protected]

Zuckerman Spaeder, LLP

101 E. Kennedy Blvd., Suite 1200

Tampa, FL 33602

Phone: (813)221-1010

Fax : (813)223-7961Counsel for Church  of  Scientology

Religious Trust

Marie Tomassi , Esq.

FBN  772062

Trenam  Kember Scharf  Barkin FryeO 'Neil l & Mull is, P.A .

Bank of  America Building

200 Cen tral Avenue, Suite 1600

St . Petersbu rg, FL 33701

Phone : (727)820-3952

Fax : (727)820 -3972E-mail: mtomassi@trenam .com

Counsel for IAS Administrations, Inc.

And U .S. IA S  M embers Trust

F . Wallace Pope , Jr., Esq.

FBN 124449

Johnson Pope Bokor Ruppel&  Burns, LLP

P. o . Box 1368

Clearwater, FL 33757

Phone : (727)461-1818

Fax : (727)462-0365

E-mail : wallvp@ ipfirm.comCounsel for Defendants

4

Page 5: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 5/47

EXHIBIT A-1

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-1 Filed 07/26/13 Page 1 of 16 PageID 1540

Page 6: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 6/47

AO 88 (l{ev. 07/1 0) Subpoena to Appear and TestifY at a He::ring or Trial in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTfor the

Middle District of Florida

Luis Garcia Saz and Maria Del Roclo Burgo Garcia

Plaintiff

v.

)

) .

))

)

CivilAction No. 8:13--cv-00220-T-27TBM

Church of Scientology Refiglous Trust, et al.

Defendant

SUBPOENA TO APPEAR AND TESTIFY

AT A HEARING OR TRIAL IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: Records Custodian for Babbitt. Johnson, Osborne & Le Clalnche, PA , cfo Theodore Babbitt

1641 Worthington Rd., Suite 100, West Palm Beach, Florida 33409

YOU ARE COMMAND ED to appear in the Un.ited States district court at the time, date, and pl ace set forth belo

to testifY at a hearing or trial in this civil action. When you arrive, you must remain at the court until the judge or a cou

officer allows you to leave. ·

I --, . .Sam Gi55ons U n r t e 0 S t r . : : a : ; ; t e : ; ; : ; s " C " " o ~ u 7 . f t : n : h : ; - ; : o ~ u ; ; : ; s e ; : : : - - - - - - - - - - , r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -Place: Courtroom No.: 138

801 N. Florida Ave., Tampa, FLL Date and Time: 07/24!2013 9:00am

You must also bring with yo u the following documents, electronically stored information, or objects (blank lfnor

applicable):

SEE ATIACHED EXHIBIT "A"

p r o v l ~ i o n s ofFed. R. civ. P. 45(c), refatlng to your protection aS aperson subJect to ·a. subpoena; and Fed.R. Civ. P. 45 (d) and (e), relating to your duty to respond to this subpoena and the potential' consequences of not doing

so, are attached.

Date: 06/28/2013

CLERK OF COURT

Signa/w-e o fClerk or Deputy Clerk Attorney's signa!ure

The name, address, e-mail, and telephone number of the attorney representing (name ofparty) ChurC?.J:l...?.f ScientologyF l < : !

__ ?ervice Organization, Inc:.. _ _ --··· , who issues or requests this subpoena, are:

F. Wallace Pope, Jr.

911 Chestnut Street, Clearwater, FL 33756

[email protected]

Phone: 727-461 -1818

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-1 Filed 07/26/13 Page 2 of 16 PageID 1541

Page 7: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 7/47

AO 88 (Rev 07/J 0) S u b p o ~ n a to Appear and Testify at a H e ~ r orTrial !n a Civil Action (pnge Z)

Civil Action No. 8:13-cv-00220-T-27TBM

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with tlte court unle$ s required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 45.)

This subpoena for (nathe of ndividual and atle, ifany)

was received by me on {date)

0 I served the subpoena by delivering a copy to the named person as follows:

on (date)-------------------------------------------0 I returned the subpoena unexecuted because:

; or

Unless the subpoena was issued on behalfof the United States, or one ofits officers or agents, I have also

tendt<red to the witness fees for one day's attendance, and the mileage allowed by Jaw, in the amount of

$

My fees are$ for travel and$ for services, for a total of$ 0.00- - - - -I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server's signature

Prfrited naine and title

Server's address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-1 Filed 07/26/13 Page 3 of 16 PageID 1542

Page 8: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 8/47

AO 88 (Rev. 06/09) Sul:>wena to App-...ar and Testify at a Hearing or Trial in ~ C i v i l Action (page 3)

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 (c), (d)t an d (e) (Effective 1211/07)

(c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena. (d) Duties in Responding to u Subpoena.(I ) Avoiding Undue Burdm or Expense; Sanctious. A part)r or (1) Protluclng Documents or Electronf.cally Stored lnfonnatiofl.

attorney responsible for issuing and serving a subpoena must take These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically

reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a stored information:person subject to the subpoena. 1l1e issuing court must enforce this (A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produceduty and impose an appropriate sanction- which may include lost documents must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary cours

earnings and reasonable attomey•s f ees - on a par!J or attorney of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the

who fails to comply. categories in the demand.

(2) Commmtd to Produce Materi{C/s or Permit InspecOon. (B) Form for Prod#cing Electronically Stored Information Not

(A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce Specified. lf a subpoena does not specify a form for producing

documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things, Ol' electronically stored information, the person responding must produc

to permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the . it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintalnc0 or in a

place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear reasonably usable form or forms.

for a deposition, hearing, or trial. (C) Electrorncally Stored Jnformallon Produced in Only One For11

(B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or The person responding need not produce the same electronically stor

tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or information in more than one form.

attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to (D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored lnformation. The person

inspecting. copying, testing or sampling any o r all of the materials or responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored

ro inspecting the premises- or to producingelectronically stored infonnation from sources that the person identifies as not reasonablyinformation in the form or fo1ms requested. The objection must be accessible because of undue burden or cost On motion to compel

served before the earlier of the time specifi_ed for compliance or 14 discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must showdays after the subpoena is served. lf an objection is made, the that the infonnation is not reasonably accessible because of undue

following rules apply: burden or cost. If that showing is made, the court may nonetheless(i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving order discovery from such sources if the requesting party shows good

party may move the issuing court for an order compelling production cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C). The court ma

or inspection. specify conditions for the discovery.

(ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and (2) aaiming Privilege or Protection.the order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party's (A) Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed

officer from sighificant expense resulting from compliance. Information under a claim that it is privileged or subject to protection

(3) Quaslti!rg or MorlifYlng a Suhpoma. as trial-prepara.t.lon material must:

(A) When Req4lred.. On ~ i m e l y motion, the issuing court must (i) expressly make the claim; and

quash or modifY a subpoena that: (ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communication

(i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply; or tangible things in a manner that, without revealing infonnation

(ii) requires a person who is neither a party nor a party's officer itself privileged or protected. will enable the parties to assess the

to travel more than 100 miles from where that person resides, Is claim.

employed, or regularly transacts business in person- except that. (B) Jnformmion Produced. If information produced in response to a

subject to Rule 45( c)(3XB)(iii), the person may be commanded to subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial-

attend a trial by traveling from any such place within the state where preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any

the trial is held; party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it.

(iii) requires disclosure of ptivileged or other protected matter, if After being o t i f i ~ , a party must promptly return, sequester, or

no exception ot waiver applies; or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use

(iv) subjects a person to undue burden. or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take

(B) When Permiffed To protect a person subject to or affected by reasonable steps to retrieve the info1mation if the par!J disclosed ita subpoena, the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modifY the before being notified; and may pl'omptly present the infonnation to th

subpoena i f t requires: court under seal for a determination of the claim. The person who

(i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research, produced the infonnation must preserve the information until the clai

development, or commercial infonnation; is resolved.

(ii) disclosing an unretained expert 's opinion or information that

does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from

the expert's study that was not requested by a party; or

(iii) a person who is neither a party nor a party' s officer to incur

substantial expense to travel more than JOO miles to attend trial .

(C) SpecifYing Conduions 11s an Alternative. In the circumstances

described in Rule 45(c)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing ormod if ing a subpoena, order appearance or production under

specified conditions 1 e servmg p(i ) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that

cannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and

(ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonablycompensated. '

(e) Contempt. The issuing court may hold in contempt a person who,

having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey the

subpoena. A nonparty's failure to obey must be excused if thesub))Qena purports to require the nonparty to attend or produce at a

place outside the limits of Rule 4S(c)(3)(A)(ii).

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-1 Filed 07/26/13 Page 4 of 16 PageID 1543

Page 9: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 9/47

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-1 Filed 07/26/13 Page 5 of 16 PageID 1544

EXHIBIT  A

All written agreements, subsequent to January 1 , 2007 , relating to litigation against any

Scientology affiliated entity, between Gray Robinson PA  or Robert Johnson, and any

of the following indiv idua ls or entities: M ike Rinder, Maty  Rathb un, Rona ld W eil, W eil &

Quaranta, PA, Theodore  Babbitt , Babbitt, Johnson , Osborne & Le Clainche , PA ,

Morgan & Morgan, Bian Leung , Holcomb & Leung, Luis Garcia, and/or Maria Garcia.

All evidence of communication s,  including  notes, afidavits, recordings , time records ,

emails and correspon dence, subsequent to January 1, 2007, re lating to litigation ag ainst

any Scientology affil iated entity, between Robert Johnson or his agents, and any of  the

follow ing individua ls or entities: Mike R inder, Marty Rathbun, Rona ld W <?H, W eii &

Quaranta PA Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt, Johnson , Osborne & Le  Clainche PA , Brian

Culkin, Morgan & Morgan, Brian Leung, Holcomb & Leung, Luis Garcia, and /or MariaGarcia .

All evidence of communications, including no tes, affidavits , recordings, time records ,

emails, and correspo ndence, sub seque nt to January 1 , 2007, relating to litiga tion

against any Sciento logy affiliated entity, be tween M ike R inder or his agents, and any of

the follow ing individua ls or entities: Robert John son , Ma rty Rathbun , Gray Robinson

PA , Ronald Weil, Weil & Quaranta PA Theodore Babbitt , Babbitt , Johnson, Osbon e

& Le Clainche PA , Morgan & Morgan, Bian Leung , Holcomb & Leung, Lu is Garcia ,

and/or Maria Garc ia.

All evidence of  communications, including notes, affidavits, recordings, time  records ,

emails and correspondence, subsequent to January 1, 2007 , re lating to litigatiion against

any Scientology affiliated entity

, between Marty Rathbun or his agents

, and any o

f thefollowing individuals or entities: Robert Johnson , Mike R inder, Ronald Weil, Weil &

Quaranta PA Theodore Babb itt, Babbitt, Johnson, Osborne & Le Claindhe PA , Brian

Culkin, Morgan & Morgan . B rian Leung , Holcomb & Leung, Luis Garcia, and/or MaiaGarc ia .

All communications, including witten agreements, notes , affidavits, recordincjs , checks ,

recordings , emails, and correspondence, subsequent to January 1 , 2007, relating to

payment of  compensation or remuneration of  any kind to Mike Rinder, betw een any  of

the following individu a ls or entities: Mike Rinder, Robert Johnson , G ray Robinson PA ,

Ronald Weil, Weil & Quaranta PA Theodore Babbitt, Babb itt , Johnson, Osborne & Le

C lainche P.A., Morgan & Morgan, B rian Leung, Holcomb & Leung, Luis Garcia, and/or-  Maria 'Ga rcia .-..  .. ____ _

Page 10: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 10/47

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-1  Filed 07/26/13 Page 6 of 16 PageID 1545

All communications , includ ing written ag reements, notes , affidavits , record ings, checks,

recordings , emails , and  correspondence , subsequent to  January 1, 2007 , relating  topayment of compe nsation or remuneration of any kind to Marty Rathbun , between any

of the following individuals or entities: Marty Rathb un, M ike R inder, Rober t Johnson ,

Gray Robinson P.A., Rona ld We il, W eil & Quaranta PA  Theodore Babb itt, Babbitt,

Johnson, Osborne & Le C lainche P .A., Morgan & Morga n , Br ian Leung, Holcomb &

Leu ng, Luis Garc ia , and/or Maria Garcia.

1508884

Page 11: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 11/47

AO 8& (Rev. 07110) Subpci"ena to Appear and TestifY at a Hearing or Trial in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTfor the

Middle District ofFlorjda

Luis Garcia Saz and Maria Del Recio Burgo Garcia

Plaintiff

)

))

)

)

TRUE COP

SERVED

v.Church of Scientology Religious Trust, et al.

Defendant

Civil Action No. 8:13-cv-00220-T 2 7 T ~ T E ; ./J 3! l 3

TIME: :r E{fL

BY:. fJJN#> -2lo tlR{UBPOENA l'OA:PPEAR AND TESTIFY

AT A HEARING OR TRlALIN A CIVIL ACTION

To: Records Custodian fo r Gray Robinson, P.A., c/o Richard Zabak

201 One Tampa City Ctr#2200, Tampa, FL 33602

SHERIFF

APPOINTED , : ) ; : j Q ( ' ! 'S E R V ~ : :

YOU AR E COMMAND ED to appear in the United States district court at the time, date, and place se t forth below

to testizy at a hearing or tr-ial in this civil action. When you arrive, you must remain at the court until the judge ar a court

officer allows you to leave.

PJ . oam (.jJOoon·s unrtea orates l/Ourmouse

ace. 801 N. Florida Ave., Tampa, FLCourtroom No.! 13B

Date and Time: 07/24/2013 9:00 am

You must also bring with you the following documents; electronically stored infOrmation, or objects {blank if ot

applicable):

SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A"

The provisions ofFed. R. Civ. P. 45(c), relating to your protection as a person subject to a subpoena, and Fed.

R. Civ. P. 45 (d) and (e), relating to your duty to respond to tltis subpoena and the potential consequences of not doingso, are attached. .

Date: 06/28/2013

CLERK OFCOURT

Signalflrv. o fClerk or Deputy Clerk

The name, address, e-mail, and telephone number of the attorney representing (name o fparty) Chll£0_of Scie!"f_tology Flag

Ser0ce Orga_nization, Inc.

F. Wallace Pope, Jr.

911 Chestnut Street, Clearwater, FL 33756

[email protected]

Phone: 727-461-1818

, who 1ssues or requests this subpoena; are:

I

l

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-1 Filed 07/26/13 Page 7 of 16 PageID 1546

Page 12: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 12/47

AO &8 (RcV'.07/f0) Subpoena to Appesr and TestilYat a Hearing DrTrial in a Civil ActiDn {page 2).

Civil Action No. 8:13-cv-00220-T-27TBM

PROOF OF SER.VIC:E

{17ris secti.on s!rould not be iled witlt tlze court unless requfred by Fed. R. Civ_ P. 45.)

This subpoena for (name o f ndividual and ti!le. if ny)

was received by me on (date)

0 I served the subpoena by delivering a copy to the named person as foJlows:

on {date)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----------------

0 I returned th e subpoena unexecuted because:

; or

Unless the subpoena was issued on behalfof he United States, or one of ts officers or agents, I have also

tendered to the witness fees for one day's attendance,_ nd the mileage allowed by law, in the amount of

$

My fees are$ for travel and $ for services, for a total of$ 0.00-------I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server's signature

Printed name and tide

Servers address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-1 Filed 07/26/13 Page 8 of 16 PageID 1547

Page 13: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 13/47

AO &8 {Rev. 06/09) Subpoena to Appear and TestifY at a Hearing or Trial in a Civil Action (page3)

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 (c), (d), l;jnd (e) (Effective 12/1/07)

{c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena.

(1) Avoiding Umfue Burden or Expe11se; Sam::tions. A par1y or

attorney responsible fo r issuing and serving a subpoena must take

reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or e;-cpense on a

person subjectto

thesubpoena The issuing court must enforce

tllisduty and impose an appropriate sanction- which may include lost

earnings and reasonable attorney's fees- on a party or attorney

who fails to comply.

{2) Commmu/. to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection.

(A) Appearance Not Required A person commanded to produce

documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things. or

to penn it th e inspection of premises, need not appear in person at t1Je

place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear

for a deposition. hearing, or trial.

(B) Olljeclions. A person commanded to produce documents or

tangible things or to permit inspection ma y serve on the pruty or

attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to

inspecting. copying, testing or sampling any or ali of he materials or

to inspecting the premises- or to producing electronically stored

information in the form or forms requested. The objection must be

served before the earlier of he time specified for compliance or 14days after the subpoena is served. l f an objection is made, the

· following rules apply:

(i ) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving

party may move the issuing court for an order compelling production.or inspection.

{ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and

the order must protect a person who is neit1Jer a party no r a party'sofficer from significantexpense resulting from compliance.

(3) QufiShingor ModifYing a Subpoena.

{A) When Required. On timely motion, t1Je issuing court mustquash or modify a ubpoena that

(i) fuils to allow a reasonable time to comply;

(ii) requires a person who is neither a party nor a party's officer

ip'trii.vd more than I00 miles from where t1Jat person resides, is .employed, or regularly transacts business in person- except that,

subject to Rule45(c)(3)(B)(iii), the person may be commanded toattend a trial by traveling from any such place within the state where

t1Je trial is lleld;

(iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if

no exception or waiver applies; or

(iv) subjects a person to undue burden_

{B) When Pemtitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by

a subpoena, the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modify th e

subpoena if t requires:

(i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research,

aevelopment, or commercial information;

(ii) disclosing an ~ n r c t a i n e d expert•s opinion or information !hat

docs not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from

!he expert's study that was nol requested by a party, or

{iii) a person who is neither.a party nor a party's officer to incur

substantial expense to travel more than 100 miles to attend trial.

(C) Specifying Conditions as an Alremative. In the circumstances

escn e - , · lead of uashing or

modifying a subpoen!!, order appearance or production uhdcr

specified conditions if the serving party:

(i) shows a substantial need for th e testimony or material that

cannot be ot1Jerwi se met without undue hardship; an d

(ii} ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably

compensated.

(d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.

(I ) Producing Docume11ls or Electronically Stored lriformatioiL

These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically

stored infunnation:(A) DocUments. A person responding to

asubpoena to produce

documents must produce them as !hey are kept in the ordinary course

of business or must organize an d label them to correspond to th e

categories in the demand.

(B) Form fo r PtoducingElectronically t o r ~ d bifOrmationNot

Speci.fzed If a subpoena does no t specify a forrn for producingelectronically stored information. the person responding must produceit in a fotm or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a

reasonably usabl e form or forms.

(C ) Elecrron:icaUy Stored Information Produced in Only One Form.

The person responding need not produce the same electronically storedinformation in more than one form.

{D) Inaccessible Electronically St.ored lnformation. The person

responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored

information from sources that the person identifies as no t •easonably

accessible because of undue burden or cosL On motion to compel

discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must showthat t1Je information is not reasonably accessible because ofundue

burden or cost Iftbat showing is made, the court may nonetheless

order discovezy from such sources i f he requesting party shows good

cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b (2)(C). The court mayspeci:fY conditions for fue discovery.

(k) Oa.imi11g J>rivilege. or ProtectioiL

(A } Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed

information under a claim that it is privileged or subject to protection

as trial-preparation material must:

(i) expressly make the claim; and

(ii} describe the nature of he withheld documents, communications,or tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information

itselfprivileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the

claim.

( B ) ' i ~ j o r m a t i o n Prcduced. I f nformation produced in response to a

subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trialpreparation material. the person making the claim ma y notify ru'ly

·party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it.

After being nofificd, a party must promptly return, sequester, or

destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use

or disclose the iofurmation until the claim is resolved; must takereasonable steps to retrieve th e information if the par1y disclosed itbefore being notified; and may promptly present the information to the

court under seal fori. determination"of he claim. Th e person who

produced the information must preserve the information until-the claim

is resolved.

(e) Contempt. The issuing court may hold in contempta person who,having been sef\l_ed; fails W i i h ~ u t adequate excuse to obey the

subpoena A nonparty's failure to obey must be excused if the

subpoena purports to require !he nonparty to attend oc produce at a

place outside the limits of Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii).

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-1 Filed 07/26/13 Page 9 of 16 PageID 1548

Page 14: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 14/47

EXHIBIT A

All written agreements, subsequent to January 1, 2007, relating to litigation against any

Scientology affiliated entity, between Gray Robinson P .A. or Robert Johnson, and anyof the following individuals or entities: Mike Rfnder, Marty Rathbun, Ronald Weil,Weif &

Quaranta, P.A., Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt, Johnson, Osborne & Le Clainche, P.A.,

Morgan & Morgan, Brian Leung, Holcomb & Leung, Luis Garcia, and/or Malia Garcia.

All evidence of communications, i n c l u ~ i i n g notes, affidavits, recordrngs, time records,

emaifs and correspondence, subsequent to January 1, 2007, relating to litigation ·against

any Scientology affiliated entity, f;>etween Robert Johns<?n or his agents, and any of he

folloWing individuals or entities: Mike Rinder, Marty Rathbun, Ronald Weil, Wei! &

Quaranta P.A. Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt, Johnson, Osborne & Le Clainche P.A , Brian

Culkin, Morgan & Morgan. Brian Leung, Holcomb & Leung, Luis Garcia, and/or Maria

Garcia.

All evidence of communications, including notes, affidavits, recordings, time records,

emails, and correspondence, subsequent to January 1, 2007, relating to litigation

against any Scientology affiliated entity, between Mike Rinder or his agents, and any of

the following individuals or entities: Robert Johnson, Marty Rathbun, Gray Robinson

P.A., Ronald Weil, Weil & Quaranta P.A Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt, Johnson, Osborne

& Le Cfafnche P.A., Morgan & Morgan, Brian Leung, Holcomb & Leung, Luis Garcia,

and/or Maria Garcia.

Ail . vidence .of communications, including notes, affidavits, .recordings_ time records,' .. . . . . . . .. . . . . .... .

emails and correspondence, subsequent to January 1, 2007, relating to litigation against

any Scientology affiliated entity, between Marty Rathbun or his agents, and any of the

following individuals or entities: Robe!i Johnson, Mike Rinder, Ronald Wei!, Weil &

Quaranta P.A. Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt, Johnson, Osborne & Le Clainche P.A , Brian

Culkin, Morgan & Morgan, Brian Leung, Holcomb & Leung,. Luis Garcia; and/or Maria

Garcia.

All commu11lcations, including written agreements, notes, affidavits, recordings, checks,

recordings, emails, and correspondence, subsequentto January 1, 2007, relating to

payment of compensation or remuneration of any kind to..-Mike Rinder, between any of

the following individuals or entities: Mike Rinder, Robert JDhnson, Gray Robinson PA .,

Ronald Wei!, Wei! & Quaranta P.A. Theqdore Babbitt, Babbitt, Johnson, Osborne & Le

Clainche P.A, Morgan Luis Garcia, and/or

Maria 'Garcia.

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-1 Filed 07/26/13 Page 10 of 16 PageID 1549

Page 15: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 15/47

All communications, including writ ten agreements, notes, affidavits, recordings, checks,

rec;ordings, emails, and correspondence, subsequentto January 1, 2007, relating to

payment of compensation or remuneration of any kind to Marty Rathbun, between any

of he following individuals or entities: Marty Rathbun, Mike Rinder, Robert Johnson,

Gray Robinson P.A., Ronald Well, Wei! &Quaranta P.A. Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt,

Johnson, Osborne & Le Clainche P.A., Morgan & Morgan, Brian Leung, Holcomb &

Leung, Luis Garcia, and/or Maria Garcia.

1508884

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-1 Filed 07/26/13 Page 11 of 16 PageID 1550

Page 16: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 16/47

- . - -.......

AO 8SB {Rev. 06/09) Subpoena to Produce l'nfunnalion, or Objects or lo Pennit lnspcctioo ofPremises in.a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTfor the

Middle District ofPlorida

Luis Garcia Saz and Maria Del Rocio Burgo Garcia,

TRUE COPPlalmljf

v.Church of Scientology Religi ous Trust, et aL,

))

}

)

))

Civil Action No . B:13-cv--00220-T-27TBM S E R ~ ~ ~ D. D A T E ~ 7 _1:(:1{ 3

0 f the action is pending in flnothcr district; staie where;

TJME: I :$:iL------- --- -- - ·---------Defondant

SUl3POENA TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS, INFORMATION, OR OBJECTS

OR TO PERMIT INSPECTION OF PREMISES IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: Records Custodian for Gray Robinson, PA , c/o Richard Zabak

201 One Tampa City Ct r #2200, Tampa, FL 33602

BY: ~ i# : _ ~ 2 1 o . - : . . _ ; _ , 7 { i = f : . .

SHERfFF

MProduction: YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce at the time. date, and place se t forth below h ~ f t ~ D PROC

documents, electronically stored information. or objects, and permit their inspection, copying, testing, or sampling c)flWfER

material: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A

P l a c e ~ Jotinson, Pope, ·Bokor, Rupi:)ei &·sums: LLP : Date and Time:

: 400 East Madison St., Suite 400

L . _ ! ~ . ! ! : ~ ~ .. ~ ~ 3 6 ~ - - - - --- -· - - - -

I 07/18/2013 9:00 ~ m'- · -- ·--- ·- ·· - - ·-· - - -- - --·

0 Inspection ofPremises: YOU AR E COMMAND.Il:D to permit entry onto the designated premises, land, or

other property possessed or controlled by you at the time, date, and location se t forth below. so that the requesting party

may inspect, measure, survey, photograph, test, or sample the or an y designated object or operation on it.

~ : - ----··---·

I

· - - - - -,Date _an_d_Tim_e_:___ ___ ---- · - ·- - --- i

'-------·- - --· -· - - ----- - --·- · - -- - · - - - - · - - ~The provisions offed. R. Civ. P, 45(c), relating to your protection as a person subject to a subpoena. and Rule

45 (d) and (e), relating to your duty to respond to thls subpoena and the potential consequences of not doing so, areattached.

Date: 07/01/2013

CLERK OF COURT

OR

Si"gnafure ofClerk or Deputy Clerk AtJorney s signalure

e name address, e-mail, and telephone number of the attorney representing (name of arty) Church Scie_ntolo_y Fl§!g_

_ ervice Qm.sooJl!m..n£- ·-· - -----·- .- · ,RobertV. Potter, Esq. 911 Chestnut Street, Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: 727-461-1818

[email protected]

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-1 Filed 07/26/13 Page 12 of 16 PageID 1551

Page 17: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 17/47

AO 888 (Re¥. 06109) Subpoena to Produce Documents, Informlltion, or Objects or to Penn t Inspection ofJ>remises in a Civil Action (!'age 2)

Civil Action No. 8:13-cv-00220-T-27TBM

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section shouUnot hi! filed with the court unless required Jy Fed. R. Civ. P. 45.)

This subpoena for (name of ndividual qnd title, if ny)

was received by me on (date) - - - - - - - -0 1served the subpoenaby delivering a copy to the named person as follows:

on {dale) ;or

0 I returned the subpoena unexecuted because;

Unless the subpoena was issued on behalfof the United States, or one of its officers or agents, I have also

tendered to the witness fees for one day's attendance, and the mileage allowed by law, in the amount of

$

My fees are$ for travel and $ __ ----··-for services, for a total of$ -· __ .QQ__ ____

I declare under penalty ofperjury that this information is true.

Date: --- - - - - ·· -- ----- --------· ·- - - - ·

Server's signawre

-- - --·---------Server •address

Additional information regarding attempted service. etc:

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-1 Filed 07/26/13 Page 13 of 16 PageID 1552

Page 18: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 18/47

AO 88B (Rev. 06109) Subpo<;na to Produce Doc_menls-, Information. or Objects or o Permit Inspection oiPremises in a Civil Action{Page 3)

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 (c), (d), and (e) (Effective l'Ul/07)

(c) ProtcctiJJg a Person Subject toll Subpoena.

(1) Avaidbtg Undue Burefen or Expense; SanctUms. A party ora t t ~ n i e y responsible for issuing and serving a subpoena must take

reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on aperson subject to the subpoena. The issuing court must enforce this

duty and impose an appropril!te sanction -which may include lost

earnings and reasonable attorney's on a part;Y or attorneywho fails to comply.

(2) Co1Wt1111td to ProduceM¢erf(l]s or Permit I!tspecJiott.(A) Appearance Not Required. t\ person commanded to produce

documents. electronically stored information, or tangible thing.;, orto pcm)it'tbe inspection of ~ , need not appear in person at the

place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear

for a deposition. bearing, or tria).

(B) Objections. A person commllllded to produce documents or

tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or

attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection toinspecting, copying. testing or sampling any or an of he materials or

to inspecting the premises -: - or to producing electronically stored

information in the form or forms requested. The objection must beserved before the earlier of the time ~ > p e c i f i e d for compliance or 14

days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, rhefollowing rules apply: ·

(i ) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the s ~ : < Y i n gparty may move the issuing court for an order compelling production

or inspection.

{ii) These ac1s may be required only as directed in the order, andthe order must protect a pe<son who is neither a party nor a party's

officer from significant expense resulting from compliance.

(3) Qrltrshlngor M udifying a SubpoenfL

(A) When Required On timely motion, the issuing court must

quash or modify a subpoena that:(i ) .thlis tD allow a reasonable to comply;

·· fti) requires a person who is neither a partynor a party's officer

to travel more than 100 miles from where that person resides, Ise m p l o y ~

or regularly transacts business in person- except that,subject to Rule 45(c)(3){D)(iii), the person may be commanded toanend a trial by traveling from any such place withio the state where

the trial is held;(Iii) requires disclosure of t i v i l ~ e < : l or otller protected m"uer, if

no exception or waiver applies; or

{lv) subjr;cts a person to undue burden.

(B) When f>ermilted To protect a person subject to or affect.ed by

a subpoena, the issuing court may, on motion, qua.sh or modifY the

subpoena ifit requires:{i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research,

development, or commercial infonnarion;

(il) disclosing an t ~ n r e t a i n e d expert's opinion or information that

does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from

the expert's study that was not requested by a party; or

{iii) a person who is neither a pilrty nor a party 's officer to incur

substanti;d expense 1o travel more than I00 mites to attend trial.

(C) SpecifYing Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstances

• t e court ma: , instead ofquashing or

modifYing a subpoena, order appearance or product1on un er

specified conditions if the serving party:

{i ) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that

cannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and{ii) ensures that 1h" subpoenaed person will be reasonably

compensatro.

(d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.

(1) Prod#cl!rg DoC/1.11lenlS or Eleetronically Stored n f f . m n a f ~ m .These procroures apply to producing documents or i < ~ C t r o o i c a l J ystored Information:

(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to producedocuments must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary

course of business or must organize and labd them to corresponcl to

the categories in1he demand.

(B) Form for ProducingElectronically r o r ~ Information NolSpecified. l f a subpoena does not specify a form for producing

electrooica.lly stored information, the person respondingmust

produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or

in a reasonably usable fonn or furms.

(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced il l Only One

Form. The person responding neecl not produce the s;uneelectronically sto.red information in more than one form.

(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored lnforliUJtion. The personresponding need not provide discovery of electronically stored

information from sources that lhe person idcutifies as reasonably

accessible because ofnndueburden or cost On motion to compeldiscovexy or for a protective order, the person responding must show

that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue

burden or cost If that showing is made. the court may nonethelessordl'!' discovery from such sources i f he requesting party shows

good cause, considering the limitations of Rule ?6(b)(2)(C). The

court may specifY conditions for the discovery.

{2) ClaimiflgPrivilege or Protectio1f.

(A) Information Withhelci. A person withholding subpoenaedinformation under a chum that it privileged or subject to

protection as trial-preparation material must

(i ) J ~ : p r e s s l y make the l ~ m ; and

(ii) describe the nature of he withheld documents,communications, or tangible thmg:; in a manner that, without

revealing infonnation itself privileged or protected, will enable the

parties to assess the claim.

(B)Information

ProducedIfinformation produced in response:"fu a ·subpoena Js subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial-

preparation material. tbe person making the claim may notit)' any

party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it.Arter being notified, a party m u ~ t promptly return, sequester, or

destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not useor disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take

reasonable steps to retrieve the information lflhe p31ty disclosed it

before being notified; and may promptly present the information to

the court.undt:r seal for a determination o f t h ~ " o c l a i m . The personwho produced the information must preserve the informal on untilthe claim is resolved.

(e) Contempt. The Issuing court may hold in contempt a person

who, having been served, fails without adeqllllte excuse to obey t.!Jc

subpoena. A nonparty's failure to obey must be excuS(:d if he

subpoenapurport!! to require the nonparty to attend or produce at a

place outside the limits of Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii).

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-1 Filed 07/26/13 Page 14 of 16 PageID 1553

Page 19: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 19/47

EXH IBIT A

All written agreements, subsequent to January 1, 2007, relating to litigation against any

Scientology affiliated entity, between Gray Robinson P.A. or Robert Johnson, and anyof the following individuals or entities: Mike Rinder, Marty Rathbun, Ronald Weil, Well &

Quaranta, P.A., Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt, Johnson, Osborne & Le Clainche, P.A,

Morgan & Morgan, Brian Leung, Holcomb &Leung, Luis Garcia, and/or Maria Garcia.

All evidence of communications, including notes, affidavits, recordings, time records,

emails.and correspondence, subsequent to January -1, 2007, relating to litigation against

any Scientology affiliated entity, between Robert Johnson or his agents, and any of the

following individuals or f;!ntities: Mike Rinder. Marty Rathbun, Ronald Weil, Wei! &

Quaranta P.A Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt, Johnson, Osborne & Le Clainche P.A., Brian

Culkin, Morgan & Morgan, Brian Leung, Holcomb & Leung, Luis Garcia, and/or Maria

Garcia

. All evidence of communications, including notes, affidavits, recordings, time records,

emails, and correspondence, sl,.lbsequent to January 1, 2007, relating to litigation

against any Scientology affiliated entity, between Mike Rinder or his agents, and any of

the following individuals or entities: Robert Johnson, Marty Rathbun, Gray Robinson

P .A. Ronald Weil, Wei! & Quaranta PA. Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt, Johnson, Osborne

& Le Clainche P.A, Morgan & Morgan, Brian Leung, Holcomb & Leung, Luis Garcia,

andfor Maria Garcia.

All evidence of co.tnmtJ.IJJcEJtions, including notes, affidavtts, recordings, time records,

emails and correspondence, subseque'nfto Jci'riuary"1' 2007, relating to litigation against

.allY Scientology affiliated entity, between Marty Rathbun or his agents, and any of the

following individuals or entities: Robert Johnson, Mike Rinder, Ronald WeB, Weil &

Quaranta P.A. Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt, Johnson, Osbome & Le Clainche P.A , Brian

Culkin, Morgan & Morgan, Brian Leung, Holcomb & Leung, Luis Garcia, and/or Maria

Garcia.

All communications, including written agreements, notes, affidavits, recordings, checks,

recordings, emai!s, and correspondence, subsequent to January 1, 2007, relating to

payment of compensation or remuneration of kind to Mike Rinder, between any of

the following individuals or entities: rvJike Rinder, Robert Johnson, Gray Robinson P.A,

Ronald Weit, Weil & Quaranta P.A. Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt, Johnson, Osborne & Le

Clainche P.A., Morgan & Morgan, Brian Leung, Holcomb & Leung, Luis Garcia, and/or

Maria Garcia.

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-1 Filed 07/26/13 Page 15 of 16 PageID 1554

Page 20: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 20/47

All communications, including written agreements, notes, affidavits, recordings, checks,

recordings, emails, and correspondence, s u b s ~ q u e n t to January 1, 2007, relating to

payment of compensation or remuneration of any kind to Marty Rathbun, between any

of the foilowing individuals or entities; Marty Rathbun, Mike Rinder, Robert Johnson,

Gray Robinson P.A., Ronald Wei!, Wei! & Quaranta P.A. Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt,

Johnson, Osborne & Le Clainche P.A. , Morgan & Morgan, Brian Leung, Hofcomb &

Leung, Luis Garcia, and/or Maria Garcia.

1508884

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-1 Filed 07/26/13 Page 16 of 16 PageID 1555

Page 21: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 21/47

EXHIBIT A-2

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-2 Filed 07/26/13 Page 1 of 16 PageID 1556

Page 22: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 22/47

AO 88 (Rev. 071!0) Subpoena to Appear and Testify at a Hearing or Trial in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRJCT COURT-for the

Middle District of Florida

Luis Garcia Saz and Maria Del Rocio Burgo Garcia

Plaintiff

v.

Church of Scientology Religious Trust, eta .Defendant

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 8 13-cv-00220-T 27TBM

SUBPOENA TO APPEAR AND TESTIFY

AT A HEARING OR TRIAL IN A ClYIL ACTION

To: Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt, Johnson. Osborne & Le Clainche, P.A., 1641 Worthington Rd., Suite 100

West Palm Beach, Florida 33409

YOU ARE COMMAND ED to appear in the United States district court at the time, date, and place set forth below

to testify at a hearing or trial in this civil action. When you arrive, you must remain at the court until the judge or a court

officer allows you to leave.

f?il------sam Gibbons Omted States Courthouseace: N .

801 . Flonda Ave., Tampa, FLI

Courtroom No.: 13B~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -[_ __ Date and Time: 07/24/2013 9:00am- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

You must also bring with you the following documents, electronically stored information, or objects (blank ifnotapplicable):

SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A"

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(c), relating to your protection as a person subject to a subpoena, and Fed.

R. Civ. P. 45 (d) and (e), relating to your duty to respond to this subpoena and the potential consequences of not doingso, are attached. · ·

Date: 06/28/2013

CLERK OF COURT

Signature ofClerk or Deputy Clerk

The n a m ~ , address, e-mail, and telephone number of the attorney representing (name ofparty) C h . _ ~ r c h ?.f. ~ c i e r : t o l o g y Flag

______ _ ~ r v i c e Orga_nization, l__c. __F. Wallace Pope, Jr.

911 Chestnut Street, Clearwater, FL 33756

wallyp@jpfirm .com

Phone: 727-461-1818

, who issues or requests this subpoena, are:

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-2 Filed 07/26/13 Page 2 of 16 PageID 1557

Page 23: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 23/47

AO 88 {Rev.07/l 0) Subpoena to Appear and Testify at a Hearing or Trial in a Civil Action (page 2)

Civil Action No. 8:13-cv-00220-T-27TBM

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This seclion should not be filed witlr the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 45.)

This subpoena for (name o f ndividual and title, if ny)

was received by me on (dare)

0 I served the subpoena by delivering a copy to the named person as follows:

on (date)

------------------------------------------------- ------------

0 I returned the subpoena unexecuted because:

; or

Unless the subpoena was issued on behalf of the United States, or one of its officers or agents, I have also

tendered to the witness fees for one day's attendance, and the mileage allowed by law, in the amount of

$

My fees are$ for travel and $ for services, for a total of$ 0.00

I declare under penalty ofperjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server's signature

Printed name and title

Server's address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-2 Filed 07/26/13 Page 3 of 16 PageID 1558

Page 24: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 24/47

AO 88 (Rev. 06109) Subpoena to Appear and Testify at a Hearing or Trial in a Civil Action (page 3)

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 (c), (d), an d (e) (Effective 12/1/07)

(c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena.

(I ) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; San.clions. A party or

attorney responsible for issuing and serving a subpoena must take

reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a

person subject to the subpoena. The issuing court must enforce this

duty and impose an appropriate sanct ion- which may include lost

earnings and reasonable attorney's f ees - on a party or attorney

who fails to comply.(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection.

(A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce

documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things, or

to permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the

place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear

for a deposition, hearing, or trial.

(B) Objections. A person commanded to· produce documents or

tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or

attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to

inspecting, copying, testing or sampling any or all of he materials or

ro inspecting the premises- or to producing electronically stored

information in the form or forms requested. The objection must be

served before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14

days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, the

following rules apply:

(i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving

party may move the issuing court fo r an order compelling production

or inspection.

(ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and

the order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party' s

otiicer from significant expense resulting from compliance.

(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena..

(A) When Required. On timely motion, the issuing court must

quash or modify a subpoena that:

(i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply;

(ii) requires a person who is neither a party nor a party' s officer

to travel more than 100 miles from where that person resides, is

employed, Or' regularly transacts busines s in person- except that,

subject to Rule 45(c)(3)(B)(iii), the person may be commanded to

attend a trial by traveling from any such place within the state where

the trial is held;

{iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if

no exception or waiver applies; or

(iv) subjects a person to undue burden.

(B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by

a subpoena, the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modifY the

subpoena if it requires:

(i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research,

development, or commercial information;

(ii) disclosing an unretained expert's opinion or information that

does not describe specitic occurrences in dispute and results from

the expert's study that was not requested by a party; or

(iii) a person who is neither a party nor a party's officer to incur

substantial expense to travel more than I 00 miles to attend trial.C S eci ing Condilions as an Alternative. In the circumstances

describedinRule45(c) , t lecou m , ·

modifYing a subpoena, order appearance or production under

specified conditions if the serving party:

(i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that

cannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and

(ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably

compensated.

(d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.

(I ) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information.

These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically

stored information:

(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce

documents must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course

of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the

categories in the demand.(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not

Specified. If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing

electronically stored information, the person responding must produce

it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a

reasonably usable form or forms.

(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form.

The person responding need not produce the same electronically stored

information in more than one form.

(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored !nformation. The person

responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored

information from sources that the person identities as not reasonably

accessible because of undue burden or cost On motion to compel

discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must show

that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue

burden or cost If that showing is made, the court may nonetheless

order discovery from such sources i f he requesting party shows good

cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26{b)(2)(C). The court may

specifY conditions for the discovery.

(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection.

(A) Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed

information under a claim that it is privileged or subject to protection

as trial-preparation material must:

(i) expressly make the claim; and

(ii) describe the nature ofthe withheld documents, communications,

or tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information

itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the

claim.

(B) Information Produced. If information produced in response to a

subpoena is subject to a claim of p1ivilege or of protection as trialpreparation material, the person making the claim may notify any

party that received the information of the claim and the basis for i t

After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or

destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use

or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take

reasonable steps to retrieve the infonnation if the party disclosed it

before being notified; and may promptly present the information to the

cou1t under seal for a determination of the claim. The person who

produced the information must preserve the information until the claim

is resolved.

(e) Contempt. The issuing court may hold in contempt a person who,

having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey the

subpoena A nonpa rty's failure to obey must be excused ifthe

subpoena purports to require the nonparty to attend or produce at aplace outside the limits of Rule 4S(c)(3)(A)(ii).

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-2 Filed 07/26/13 Page 4 of 16 PageID 1559

Page 25: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 25/47

EXHIBIT A

All written agreements, subsequent to January 1, 2007, relating to litigation against any

Scientology affiliated entity, between Gray Robinson PA . or Robert Johnson, and any

of the following individuals or entities: Mike Rinder, Marty Rathbun, Ronald Wei! , Wei! &

Quaranta, P.A., Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt, Johnson, Osborne & Le Clainche, P.A.,

Morgan & Morgan, Brian Leung, Holcomb & Leung, Luis Garcia, and/or Maria Garcia.

All evidence of communications, including notes, affidavits, recordings, time records,

emails and correspondence, subsequent to January 1, 2007, relating to litigation against

any Scientology affiliated entity, ~ e t w e e n Robert Johnson or his agents, and any of the

following individuals or entities: Mike Rinder, Marty Rathbun, Ronald Weil, Wei I &

Quaranta P.A. Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt, Johnson, Osborne & Le Clainche P.A., Brian

Culkin , Morgan & Morgan, Brian Leung, Holcomb & Leung, Luis Garcia, and/or Maria

Garcia.

'All evidence of communications, including notes, affidavits, recordings, time records,

emails, and correspondence, subsequent to January 1, 2007, relating to litigation

against any Scientology affiliated entity, between Mike Rinder or his agents, and any of

the following individuals or entities: Robert Johnson, Mar ty Rathbun, Gray Robinson

P.A. , Ronald Well, Weil & Quaranta P.A. Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt, Johnson, Osborne

& Le Clainche P.A., Morgan & Morgan, Brian Leung, Holcomb & Leung, Luis Garcia,

and/or Maria Garcia.

All evidence of communications, including notes, affidavits, recordings, time records,

emails and correspondence, subsequent to January1,

2007, relating to litigation againstany Scientology affiliated entity, between Marty Rathbun or his agents, and any of the

following individuals or entities: Robert Johnson, Mike Rinder, Ronald Wei!, Weil &

Quaranta P.A. Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt, Johnson, Osborne & Le Clainche P.A., Brian

Culkin, Morgan & Morgan, Brian Leung, Holcomb & Leung, Luis Garcia, and/or Maria

Garcia.

All communications, including written agreements, notes, affidavits, recordings, checks ,

recordings, emails, and correspondence, subsequent to January 1, 2007, relating to

payment of compensation or remuneration of any kind to Mike Rinder, between any of

the following individuals or entities: Mike Rinder, Robert Johnson, Gray Robinson P.A.,

Ronald Wei!, Wei! & Quaranta P.A. Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt, Johnson, Osborne &Le

Cla inche P.A. , Morgan & Morgan, Brian Leung, Holcomb & Leang , Luis Gar cia , and/or

Maria 'Garcia.

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-2 Filed 07/26/13 Page 5 of 16 PageID 1560

Page 26: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 26/47

All communications, including written agreements, notes, affidavits, recordings, checks,

recordings, emails, and correspondence, subsequent to January 1, 2007, relating to

payment of compensation or remuneration of any kind to Marty Rathbun, between any

of the following individuals or entities: Marty Rathbun, Mike Rinder, Robert Johnson,

Gray Robinson P.A, Ronald Well, Weil & Quaranta P.A. Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt,

Johnson, Osborne & Le C!ainche P.A.; Morgan & Morgan, Brian Leung, Holcomb &

Leung, Luis Garcia, and/or Maria Garcia.

1508884

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-2 Filed 07/26/13 Page 6 of 16 PageID 1561

Page 27: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 27/47

AO 8S (Rev. (J]/10) S ubpoena to Appear and Testifyat a Hearing or Trial in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRlCT COURTfor the

Middle District of Florida TRUE COP

SERVED

DATE:r l ~ l t

uis Garcia Saz and Malia Del Rocio Burgo Garcia

P!ai11tijf

v.Church of Scientology Religious Trust, et aL

)

)

)

))

\.. " = > ~

Civil Action No. 8:13-cv-00220-T-271fiME:._=----_-:J'--'r_

Defendant

SUBPOENA TO APPEAR AND TESTIFY

A1 A HEARING OR TRIAL IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: Richard Zabak, Gray Robinson, PA, 201 On e Tampa CHy Ctr#2200, Tampa, FL 33602

B Y : _ . . : . . . . ® ' - - -

SHERIFF

APPOJNTED PRO

SERVER

YOU ARE COMMAND ED to appear in the United States district court at the time, date, and place se t forth below

to testifY at a hearing or trial in this civil action.. When you arrive, you must remain at the court until the judge or a court

officer allows you to leave.

Courtroom No.: 138

Date and Time: 07/24/2013 9:00am

You must also bring with you the following documents, electronically stored information, or objects (blank ifno t

appllcable):

SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A"

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(c), rela ting to your protection as a person subject to a subpoena, and r"ed.R. Civ. P. 45 (d) and (e), relating to your duty to respond to this subpoena and the potential consequences of not doingso, are attached. ·

Date: 06/28/2013

CLERKOF COURI

Signature o fClerkor Deputy Oerk

e address e-mail, and telephone number of the attorney representing (name o f arty) Church of Scientology Flaq_

____ ~ e i V . . . : . . c . . : i c e : . : _ O r - " g ' - ' a . c . . . n c . : . i z _ a c . . t i o n . . . : c · l _ n c . . c .____ who issues or requests

F _Wallace Pope, Jr.

911 Chestnut Street, Clearwater, FL 337 56

[email protected]

Phone: 727-461-1818

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-2 Filed 07/26/13 Page 7 of 16 PageID 1562

Page 28: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 28/47

AO 88 (ftev.01/l0) Subpoena to Appear and TestifYat a Hearing or Trial in a Civil Action (page2)

Civil Action No. 8:H-cv-00220-T-27TBM

PROOF OF SERVICE

(Tfris sectiVIt sltould no t be filed witlr the cou.rt unless required by Fe(L R. Civ. P. 45.)

This sUbpoena for (name o f ndividual and title, i fany)

was received by me on (dare)

0 I served the subpoena by delivering a copy to the named person as follows:

on {date)- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - ----------------

0 I returned the subpoena unexecuted because:

; or

Unless the subpoena .was issued on behalfof he United States, or one ofits officers or agents, I have also

tendered to the witness fees for one day's attendance, and the mileage allowed by law, in the amount of

$ .

My fees are$ for travel and$ for services, for a total of$ 0.00- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -l declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server's signature

Prinled name and title

Server's address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-2 Filed 07/26/13 Page 8 of 16 PageID 1563

Page 29: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 29/47

AO 88 (Rev. 06/09) Subpoena to Appear and TestifYat a Hearing or Trial in a Civil Action (page 3')

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 (c), (d), an d {e) (Effective 11../1107)

(c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena.

(I ) A l'oiding Undue Burifen or Expense.,· SanctionS- A party or

attorney responsible fo r issuing end serving a subpoena must take

reasonable steps 1n avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a

person subject to the subpoena. Th e issuing court must enforce thisduty and impose an appropriate sanction- which may include lost

earnings an d reasonable attorney's f ees - on a party or attomey

wh o :fuils to comply.

(2) Comnwtd to Produce Materials or Permit ~ t s p e c J i o J L(A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce

documents, electronically stored information,. or tangible things, or

to permit th e inspection of premises, need not appear in person at !he

place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear

for a deposition, hearing, or trial.

(B) Objectfons. A person commanded to produce documents or ·

tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on th e party or

a t t o m ~ y designated in th e subpoena a written objection to

inspecting, copying, testing or sampling any or aU of he materials or

to inspecting th e premises- or to producing electronically stored

infurmation in the form or forms requested. Th e objection must be ·

served before th e earlier of he time specified fo r compliance or 14days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, the

following rules apply:

(i) At any time,.on notice to the commanded person, the serving

party may move the issuing court for an order compelling production

or inspection..(ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, an d

the order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party's

officer from significant expense resulting from compl iance.

(3) Quashil:g or ModifYing a Subpoma.

(A) When Required. On timely motion, the issuing court must

quash or modify a sobpoena that:

(i ) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply;

(ii) requires a person who is neither a party no r a party's officer

travd more than I 0 miles from where that person resides, is

employed, or regularly transacts business in person- except !hat,

subject to Rule 45(c)(3)(B)(iii), tb e person may be commanded to

attend a trial by traveling from any such place within !he state where

th e trial is held;

(iii) requires disclosure ofprivileged or other protected r n a ~ if

no exception or waiver applies; or

(iv) subjects a person to undue burden.

(B) When Pem1itt.ed. To protect a pefSon subject to or affected by

a subpoena, the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modifY th e

subpoena if t requires:

(i ) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research,

development, or commercial information;

(ii) disclosing an umetained x p ~ ' s opinion or information that

does no t describe specific ocCurrences in di spute an d results from

the expert's study that was not requested by a party; or

(iii) a person who is neithera party nora party's officer to incur

substantial expense to travel more than J00 miles to attend trial.

(C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstances

descri m u e . , · uashm or

modifYing a subpoena, order appearance or prodoction under

specified conditions i f he serving party:

(i ) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that

cannot be otherwise met wnhout undue hardship; and

(ii) ensures that th e subpoenaed person will be reasonably

compensated.

(d ) })uties ln Responding to a Subpoena.

{1} Producing Docwm:nts or ElectronicallyStored Informtlfion.

These procedures apply to producing documcnts or electronically

store d infurmatio;n:

(A)Doc-.onen/s..

A person responding to a subpoena to producedocumen!S must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course

of business or must organi;ze and Tabel them to correspond to th e

categories in !he demand.

(B) Form fo r Producing l e ~ t r o n i c a l l y Stored InformationNo t

Specified. If a subpoena does not specify a form fo r producing

electronically stored information, the person respondingmust produce

It in a form or fonns in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a

reasonably usable form or forms.

(C) Electronically Stored Infimnation Produced in Only One Farm.

The person responding need not produce the same electronically stored

information in more than one form.

{D) Inaccessible ElectronicaDyStored Information. Th e person

responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored

information from sources that the person identifies as not reasonably

accessible because of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel

discovery or for a protective onler, the person respondingmust showthat th e information.is not reasonably accessib le because of undue

burden or cost If hat showing is made, the court ma y nonetheless

order discovery from such sources if he requesting party shows good

cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b (2)(C). The court may

specify conditions for th e discovery.

(2) Claiming Privilege or Protectio1L

(A} information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed

information under a claim that it is privileged or subject to protection

as trial-preparation material must:

(i) expressly make the claim; and

(ii) describe the nature of he withheld documents, communications,

or tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information

itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the

claiQJ. .

(B) /nfonnation Prcxluced. [ f nformation produced In response to a

subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material, the person milking the claim may notifY at!)'

party that received the information of th e claim and the basis for iL

After being notified, a party must promptly retum, sequester, or

destroy the specified il l ormation and any copies it has; must not use

or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take

reasonable steps to retrieve the information if he party disclosed it

before being notified; an d may promptly present the information to the

court undet seal for a etermination of he claim. Th e person who

produced the information mustpreserve the infurmation until the claim

is resolved.

(e) Conte1J1pt. The issuing may hold in conrempta person who,

having been sery..ed; fulls.without adequate excuse to obey the

subpoena. A nonparty's failure to obey must be ex.cused i f he

subpoena purports to require the nonparty to attend or produce at a

place outside th e limits of Rule 45(c)(J)(A)(ii).

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-2 Filed 07/26/13 Page 9 of 16 PageID 1564

Page 30: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 30/47

EXHIBIT A

Al l written agreements, subsequent to January 1, 2007, relating to litigation against any

Scientology affiliafed entity, between Gray Robinson P.A. or Robert Johnson, and anyof the following individuals or entities: Mike Rinder, Marty Rathbun, Rof!ald Wei!, Wei! &

Quaranta, PA., Theodore Bab.trlft:, Babbrtt, Johnson, Osbome & Le Clainche, P.A.,

Morgan &Morgan, Brian Leung, Holcomb & Leung, Luis Garcia, and/or Maria. Garcia.

Al l evidence of communications, including notes, affidavits, recordings, time records,

emails and correspondence, subsequent to January 1, 2007, relating to litigation ·against

any Scientology affiliated entity, ~ e t w e e n RobertJohnson or his agents, and any of the

following individuals or entities: Mike Rinder, Marty Rathbun, Ronald Wei!, Wei! &

Quaranta P.A Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt, Johnson, Osborne & Le Clainche P.A., Brian

Culkin, Morgan & Morgan, Brian Leung, Holcomb & Leung, Luis Garcia, and/or Maria

Garcia.

All evidence of communications, including notes, affidavits, recor-dings, time records,

emails, and correspondence, subsequent to January 1, 2007, relating to litigation

against any Scientology affiliated entity, between Mike Rinder or his agents, and any of

the following individuals or entities: Robert Johnson, Marty Rathbun, Gray Robinson

P.A., Ronald Wei!, Weif & Quaranta PA . Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt, Johnson; Osborne

& Le Clainche P.A., Morgan & Morgan, Brian Leung. Holcomb & Leung, Luis Garcia,

and/or Maria Garcia.

Al l.evidence .of communications, ·ncluding ~ o t e s , affidavits) recordings, t i m ( ' } . [ f ; G O r ~ : S ·emails and correspondence, subsequent to January 1, 2007, relating to litigation against

any Scientology affiliated entity7 between Marty Rathbun or his agents, and any of the

following individuals or entities:Hobert Johnson, Mike Rinder, Ronald Wei!, Wei! &

Quaranta P.A. Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt, Johnson, Osborne & Le Cfainche P.A, Brian

Culkin, Morgan & Morgan, Brian Leung, Holcomb & Leung, Luis Garcia, and/or Maria

Garcia.

AU communications, including written agreements, notes, affidavits, recordings, checks,

recordings, emails, and correspqndence, subsequent to January 1, 2007, relating to

payment of compensation or remuneration of any kind to Mike Rinder, between any of

the following individuals or entities: Mike Rinder, Robert Johnson, Gray Robinson ·P..A.,

Ronald Wei!, WeiJ & Quaranta P .A. Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt, Johnson, Osborne & Le

Clainche P.A., Morgan Luis Garcia, and/or

Maria 'Garcia.

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-2 Filed 07/26/13 Page 10 of 16 PageID 1565

Page 31: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 31/47

All communications, incfudtng written agreements, notes, affidavits, recordings, checks,

recordings, emails, and correspondence, subsequent to January 1, 2007, relating to

payment of compensation or remuneration of any kind to Marty Rathbun, between any

of the following individuals or entitles: Marty Rathbun, Mike Rinder, Robert Johnson,

Gray Robinson P A., Ronald Wei!, Wei!&

Quaranta P A. Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt,Johnson, Osborne & Le Clainche P.A., Morgan & Morgan, Brian Leung, Holcomb &

Leung, Luis Garda, and/or Maria Garcia.

1508884

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-2 Filed 07/26/13 Page 11 of 16 PageID 1566

Page 32: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 32/47

..--... ·-...- . ..

. .. .. , . ~ - , · · · ~ ~ . -- ---.... . .. ...__ ___. _ -.-.-..... ..- ........ ..____ _.

AO 88B (Rev. 06109) S u b p o ~ n a )o Produce Documents, fnformation, or Object5 or ro l'cmrit!nspection orPremi>% in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTfor the

Middle District ofFlorida

Luis Garcia Saz and Maria De l Rocio Burgo Garcia,

TRUE C

SERV

Plaintiff

v.

)))

)))

Civil Action No.DATE:

8:13-cv-00220-T-27TBMt \ s

Church of Scientology Religious Trust, et al., T I M E : ~- - - -·- - - - · - - - -

( I f t h ~ action is p e o d i n ~ in another ui:;trict. stat\': where; lS:'h.'\,

>Bv:·__. : : ; : r " ~ ; ._ ,Defendcirrt

SUBPOENA TO .PRODUCE DOCUMENTS, INFORMATION, OR OBJECTSOR TO PERMIT JNSPECTlON OF PREMISES IN A CIVIL ACTlON

t ~ : . . . . _ _ - l Z ~ ! . . J L . r ; 7 .

To: Rich<1rd Zabek- Gray Robinson, P A

201 One Tampa City Ctr #22D(}, Tampa, FL 33602

SHERIAPPOINTED P

SERVE

rPfProdllction: YOU AR E COMMANDED to produce at the time, date, and place set forth below the following

doct,tment:s, electronically stored information, or objects, and permit their inspeetion, copying, testing, or sampling f t h ~material: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A

: Place; · <ihnson; Pope, Bokor, -Ruppef& stiiT1s, LLf:' · · ·

I 400 East Madison Sf., Suite 400I 07/18/2013 9:00am' - - - ~ ! l : ' p a , FL 31_60_2__ - - --- - - - ___ ._ _ ---- - - -

0 Inspection ofPremises: YOU ARE COMMANDED to permit entry onto the designated premises, land,. or

other property possessed or controlled by yo u at the time, date, and location se t forth below, so that the requesting party

may inspect, measure, survey, photograph, test, or sample the property or an y designated object or operation on i t

- - - - - ~ D a t e andTime: ·--- ·--,

..- · ·---·--··---·- - ·-- - -- ....L .. ~ · - -

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. J>. 45(c), relating to your protection as a person subject to a subpoena, an d Rule

45 {d) and (e), relating to your duty to respond to this subpoena and the potential consequences of not doing so, are

.attached.

Date: 07/01/2013

CLERKOFCOURT

---- ·- ·-·-Sig114ture ofClerk or Deputy Clerk Attorney'ssignoll/l'f!

.

J

The name, address, e-mail, and telephone number of the attorney representing (name o f arty) C J : l . l : ' ~ c h of Scie.ntologi.£13l.Y .

Service r g ~ n i z . a t l o n , . J n c . . ____ ·--- - - , who issues 8f reEJI:lSSts this subpoena, are·

RobertV. Potter, Esq. 911 Chestnut Street, Clearwater, FL 33756 Phone: 727-461-1818

[email protected] m

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-2 Filed 07/26/13 Page 12 of 16 PageID 1567

Page 33: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 33/47

.. . ·: .. . . . . -· ... . . --·- -- . - . . ... ·-··· .. . ... --- ·- ---------- ......_ . . - .. , . . . . . .

AO 88B (R.eY. 06/09) Subpol!lla 10 Produce Docuneot:s, Information, or 011jects or to l'cl1flit lnspectiorrof'P=niscs in 11 Civil Action (l'age;2)

Civll Action No. B:13-cv-00220-T-27TBM

PROOFOF SERVICE

(Tit is section should not he iled witlt the courtlll1less required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 45.)

This subpoena for (11ame ofmdMdual and title, if any)

was received by me on (dote) --------------0 t serve« the subpoena by delivering a copy to the named person as follows:

---- ·-·· -·--- - - - - - - - - ·-------· ..on (date)

0 I returned the subpoena unexecuted because:

- - - - - ·-· -----·

--------.; or

Unless the subpoena was issued on behalfof the United States, or one of its officers or agents, I have also

tendered to the witness fees for one day's attendance, and the mileage allowed by law, in the amount of

t$

My fees are$ fur travel and $ for services, for a totai of$ __Q,QL__ .

1declare under penalty ofpeJjury that this information is true.

Date: --- · ·--- - ·---·----· .. -----Server's signature

Server's address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-2 Filed 07/26/13 Page 13 of 16 PageID 1568

Page 34: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 34/47

~ - - -- .... -·---·- ........ ... ---· -· ----·- ·-- . - - ·- .... - ·--- .._._

AO 88 B (Rev. 06/09) Subpoena to Produce Documents. lnformi!lion, or ObjectS or (J) Pennit Inspcccion ofPremises io a CiYil Action(Page 3)

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 (c), (d), an d (e) (Effective 12/l/07)

(c) Protecting <1 Person Subject to a Subpoena.(l)Avoiding Undue Burde n ur Expense; Sqn(:l!Dns. A party or

attoroey responsible for issuingand

serving a subpoena must!<lke

reasonable steps 10 avoid i m p ~ i n g u n d u ~ burden or expense on aperson subject to the subpoena. The issuing court must enforce this

duty and impose an appropriate S"4Jlclion-which may include loslearnings and reasonable attorney's fees - on a party or attorneywho fails to romply.

(2) Cumntand to Prothtce Materials or Permit Inspec:flott.(A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce

documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things, orto permit the inspection of premise:;, need not li!>Peat: ;:n person at theplace of production or inspection unf(:SS also commanded to appearfor a depo!iition, hearing, or trial.

(B) Object!ora. A pen;on commanded lo produce docWPems or

tllngible things or to permit n s p e ~ t i o n may serve on the party orattorney designmed in the subpoena a written objeaion toinspecting, copying, testing or sampling any or all of he materi&ls or

to inspecting the premises -or o producing electronically storedinformation In the form or forms requested. The objection must beserved before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14

days after the subpoena is served. Jf an objection is made, thefollowing rules apply:

(i) At any time, on notice to the commanded per.>on, 1..111:: servingparty may move the issuing court fur an order compelling productionor inspection,

(ii) These acts may be required only ns directed in the order. andthe orda- must protect ll person who is neither a party nor a party's

officer from significant expense resulting from compliance.(3) W ~ S h l n g or Modi fying aSubp(}(!nfL

(A) When Required. On timely motion. the Issuing court mustquash ot modify a subpoena that:

(i ) fiUis to allow a r e a s ~ n a b l c time to comply;· (ii) te{{uires a person who is neither a party nor a party's officer

to travel more than 100 miles from where "thai person resides, is

employed, or regularly tqmsac\S business in person - ex:cept that.$Ubject to Rule 45(cX3)(B)(iii), the person may be commanded roattend a llial by traveling from any such p!Bce within the state whererhe trial Is held;

(lii) requires disclosur(: of privileged o< orhc• protected matter, if

·no exception or waiver applies; or

(iv) subjectS a person to uncluc burden .(B) When Permilt.ed. To protect a pc:rson subject to or affected. by

a subpoena, the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modify thesubpoena if It tequires: ·

(i) disclosing a tradl$ secret or other confidential research,development,. or commercial information;

(ii) disclosing an unrdai.ned expert's opinion or information that

does not describe speci fie occurrences in dispute;; lUld results fromthe expert's study that was not requested by a plllty; or

(iii) a person who is neither a partynor a party's officer to incur

substantial e1<pense to travel more than 100 miles to attend trial.(C) SpecifYing Condilions as an Alternative. In 1he circumstances

describ m u e c , , · ·modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under

specified conditions if tx:serving party:

(i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material thaicannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and

(ii) ensures that the subpoeneed person will be reasonably

compensa.'e<l.

(d ) Duties in Rt'Sponding to a Subpoena.

( 1} Producing Documents or F;lectromc4lly Stored 1nfomwtfoft.These procedures apply to proc!ucing documents or electronicallystored information:

(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to producedocuments must produce: them as they are kept in the ordinarycourse of business or mustorganize ll!ld label them tn correspond tothe- categories in the demand.

(B) Form for Producing Eiedronica/ly Stored lrzformotlon NotSpecifted. If a subpoenadoes not . p ~ t y a form for producingelectronically stored illformation, 1he person responding mustproduce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily ; ~ i n t a i n c d or

in a reasonably uSilble form or forms.(C) Eiectronlcally Stored ftiformaJ.fon Produced ill Only

Fvrm. The person responding ~ not produce the same

electronically stored information in more than one form.

(D) fnacces&ible Eledronical{ySturedlnformation. The personresponding need not provide discovery of electronically storedinformation from sources that the person identifies as not reasonablyaccessible because ofundue burden or cost.. On motion to compeldiscovery or for a protective order, the person responding muse show

that t11e information i s not reasonably accessible because of undue~ u r d e n or cost rr that showing is made, the court may nonethclcssorder discovery from such souro:s if the requesting party shows

good cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C). Thecourt may specify conditions for the discovery.

(2) Claimillg Privilege or Protedwrt.

(A) Jnforrnation Wl1hheld. A person withholoingsubpoenaed

infonnaiion uudcr- a claim that it .s privileged or subject toprotection as trial-preparation material must:

(i) expressly make the claim; and(ii) describe the nature ofthe withheld documents,

communications, CK" t<mgible things in a manna- that, withoutrevealing information itselfprivileged or protected, will enable theparlies·i> asSesS the claim.

{B) JnforJn4tion Produced. If information produced in response to asubpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trialpreparation material, the person making the claim may notify anyparty that received the information of the claim and lhe basis for itAfier being o t i f i e d , a party must prompTly return, sequester, or

destroy the specified information and any copies: it has; must not use

· or disclose the information on til the claim is resolved; mo st l>!ke

reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the partY disclqsed it

before being notified; and may promptly present the information tothe court under seaJ for a determination of fhc claim. The personwho produced the information must preserve the information untilthe claim is resolved.

(e} Contempt. The issqing coutt may hold in c o n t e m p ~ e personwho, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey thesubpoena. A nonparty's failvre to obey must be excused if the

subpoena purports to require the nonparty ro attend or produce at aplace outside the limits of Rule 45(c){3)(A)(ii).

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-2 Filed 07/26/13 Page 14 of 16 PageID 1569

Page 35: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 35/47

EXHIBITA

All written agreements, subsequent to January 1, 2007, relating to litigation against any

Scientology affiliated entity, between Gray Robinson P.A. or Robert Johnson, and anyof the following individuals or entities: Mike Rinder, Marty Rathbun, Ronald Wei!, Wei! &

Quaranta, P.A., Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt, Johnson, Osborne & Le Clainche, P.A.,

Morgan & Morgan, Brian Leung, Holcomb & Leung, Luis Garcia, and/or Maria Garcia .

All evidence of communications, including notes, affidavits; recordings, time records,

emails and correspondence, subsequent to January 1, 2007, relating to litigation against

any Scientology affiliated entity, between Robert Johnson or his agents, and any of the

following individuals or entities : Mil<e Rinder, Marty Rathbun, Ronald Wei!, Wei! &

Quaranta P.A. Theodore Babbitt. Babbitt, Johnson, Osborne & Le Clainche P.A., Brian

Culkin, Morgan & Morgan, Brian Leung, Holcomb & Leung, Luis Garcia, and/or Maria

Garcia.

All evidence of communications, including notes, affidavits, recordings, time records,

emails, and correspondence, subsequent to January 1, 2007, relating to litigation

against any Scientology affiliated entity, between Mike Rinder or his agents, and any of

the following individuals or entities: Robert Johnson, Marty Rathbun, Gray Robinson

P.A ., Ronald Wei!, Wei! & Quaranta P.A. Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt, Johnson, Osborne

& Le Clainche P.A., Morgan & Morgan , Brian Leung , Holcomb & Leung, Luis Garcia,

andfor Maria Garcia.

Afl d ~ n c ~ e of communications, including notes, affidavits, recordings, time records,

emails and c o r ~ e ~ p ~ ~ d ~ n c e , suhse(iue"Tit to "Jariuary 1, 2007, relating to litigation against

any Scientology affiliated entity, between Marty Rathbun or his agents, and any of the

following individuals or entities: Robert Johnson, Mike Rinder, Ronald Weil, Wei! &

Quaranta P.A Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt, Johnson, Osbome & Le Clainche P.A., Brian

Cu lkin, Morgan & Morgan, Brian Leung, Holcomb & Leung , Luis Garcia, and/or Ma rta

Garcia .

Al l communications , including written agreements, notes, affidavits, recordings, checks,

recordings, emails, and correspondence, subsequent to January 1, 2007, relating to

payment of compensation or remuneration of any kind to Mike Rlnder, between any of

the following individuals or entities: Mike Rinder, Robert Johnson, Gray Robinson P.A,

Ronald Wei!, Wei! & Quaranta P.A. Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt, Johnson, Osborne & L.e

Clainche PA. , Morgan & Morgan, Brian Leung, Holcomb & Leung, Luis Garcia, and/or

Ma ria GarcJa_

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-2 Filed 07/26/13 Page 15 of 16 PageID 1570

Page 36: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 36/47

All communications, including written agreements, notes, affidavrrs, recordings, checks,

recordings, emai!s, and correspondence, subsequentto January 1, 2007, relating to

payment of compensation or remuneration of any kind to Marty Rathbun, between any

of the following individuals or entities: Marty Rathbun, Mike Rinder, Robert Johnson,

Gray Robinson PA., Ronald Wei!, Wei! & Quaranta P.A. Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt,'

Johnson, Osborne & Le Clalnche P.A., Morgan & Morgan, Brian Leung, Horcomb &

Leung, Luis Garda, and/or Maria Garcia.

1508884

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-2 Filed 07/26/13 Page 16 of 16 PageID 1571

Page 37: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 37/47

EXHIBIT A-3

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-3 Filed 07/26/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID 1572

Page 38: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 38/47

.;>;<P '

AO 88B (Rev. 061{)9) Sul>po_ena to Produce Documents, J n f o r m a t i o n , b j c : ~ t s - o r ro ~ e r m n Jospealon ofPremises in a Civil Aclion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTfor th e

M i d d l ~ District o f Florida

Luis Garcia Saz and Marra Del Rocio Burgo'C;_arcia,TRUE COP:SERVED

Plaii71/ff

Chur.Ch of Scientology·Religious Trust, et al.,

)

)

)

)))

Civil Action No. 8:13-cy700220-T-27TBrtrAtEi'?{3.tt?Of the action is p e n d i n ~ ~ ; in another district. sfatewhe'f4ME:._._ ...7;.;.· . ._!;:;5,. ~ : : : : .W f

Defendant ~ Y : - - ~ ~: : , . . . . : . :. .:!....f'J_qj:.___ . _ ~ \ e . _ i L P " ' -SUBPOENA TO P-RODUCE DOCUME)'ITS_, ll,'lFORMATION,.OROB.JECTS

OR TO PERMIT INSPECTION OF PRE:MISES:lN A CIVIL ACTiON

To: Michael Rinder, 808 Bentwood Court, Palm Harbor, Florida 34683 ·SHEPJFF

. APPbiNTED PRO

rpfProduction: YOU AR E C O M M A N D E ~ to produc,e at the time, d a t e ~ f!qil;pJace.setforth b e l o w t h e f o l l o w i n ~ E R V E Rdocuments, electronicaily stored information, of objects, and penn t their inspection, copying, testing, or sampiing,_ fthe

material:SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A

1 l a ~ ; ; ; · Johnl)on ..F>oi>e: B o k o r ~ R u p j n ~ i a . - s u n 1 s , l i . P' 400 East Madison St. Sulte 400

Date and Time:I

07/18/2'013 9:00am__ _ . ____ ~ ~ P . ~ ~ F L ~ 3 6 0 ~ - · .. ____ . ·--- · - - - - __ .. .-

..,._,;. ---- ··- · ·---··---.-·-·-- __ .. -..:.... .. ,_.,,

0 l n ~ p e p t i o n ofPremises; YOV AR E COMMANDED toperinih:niry onto the e s ~ g n a t e d prett1)$·es, land, or

o t h ~ t : p r o p e r t y possessed or controiieifby you anhe i m ~ , d a t e , a r t ~ i ' l o c a i i o n set forth below,:so h a t : t h ~ ; ' e q u e s t i n g party

may inspect, measure, survey, photograph, test, or sample the propertY or any designated object or r : a t i o n on it.

i i ~ ~ e : - - - - - - - - - ·- ----- ·- - - - - - .. ---.,.----- _ ._ ·-- ·! ate and Time:- - - - · - - - - · - ~

!;

L .._ .__ .___ - --j

.,______ -·- - - - : - - - - - ________ _ _ _ .,__ _

The ·prov s i . ~ n s ofFed. R. Civ. P. 4$.(c); r-elating to -your protection .as ~ p ~ ~ 9 n subject to a subpoena, andRule

45 {dl _an d (e),-.relati'ng to your duty to resp011d to this subpoena and the p6ten:ti:aLc!>nsequences o'fnot-doing;$c;, are

attached.

Date: 07/01/2013

OR ~ ~ ·- · - - - · · · - ~ · · · -

CLERKOF COURT

------·----Signature ofClerk orDepuly'C[I?rk Attorney's signature

The -name, address, e--mail; and telephone ,nurnber of he attorney r e i : i t ~ s e i t t i n ~ o ( n a m e ofparry} CljurcJ:LQf ~ . S ~ Q ! . Q l o g y Ff91L$eryJce Q!:g§pizat:iQ!1. Inc.______ _

______ ._  _ __ __,_ _ _ , wh o issues :or:requests this subpoena, are:Robert V. Potter, Esq" 911 Chestnut Street, Cleal'l\fater, Fl33756 Phone: 727-46H 818

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-3 Filed 07/26/13 Page 2 of 11 PageID 1573

Page 39: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 39/47

AO 88B 06109):SubP.O:Cna·to Produce ~ u m e o l 3 ~ J z : l ( o ~ r n a t o r D b j c c t s or ro P e r i n i ~ lnsi>e'c.lon of Premises In a Civil A ~ l i o n (Page 2)

Civil Action No . 8:13-cv-00220-T-27'FBM

P R O O F Q F " S E R V r ~ E(This sectiotl should not be iled with tlte couri un1essf£ujuiredby Fed. R. Cw. P. 45.)

This subpoena for (name of ndividual and title, ifany)

was received by me on {date)

- - - · ------'---·-- -···-·· -- ·-· --.--·-· ·- - ·

0 I served the subpoena by delivering a copy to the named person as follows:

· - ~ - .. . . .__,._ ·-- - - - - - -·-- ·-·-· ·- - -· --- ________ ,. __ --on {dare) ; or

0 [returned the subpoena unexecuted because:

Unless the subpoena was ·issued on behalf.of h ' S ~ ' U ~ i ' t e d States,.or one of its officers ·on.gents, l.ha'l'¢ ; 1 l . ~ otendered to the ·witness fees for one day's attenda.'nce, .and the mileage allowed by ·raw, in the amountof

$

Myfeesare$ for e r v i c i : ! for·a total of$ . __ _O.O.Q...

I deciare under penalty ofperjury that'this i n f o r r n a t i o i l true.

Date:SerVer's signature

- - ----- ·- - ·-----·- - · ··-· .- - - - - - · · - ·SerVer 'nlddress

Additional information regarding attempted service, e t c ~

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-3 Filed 07/26/13 Page 3 of 11 PageID 1574

Page 40: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 40/47

AO 8SB (ReY. 06/09) Subpoena to Produce Documents, Information. or b j ~ l s or'to ~ e r i J i . i l l m p e c ; l i o l ! of Premises in a Civil Action( Page 3)

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 (c), (d), and (e) (Effective 12/i/0.7)

(c) Protecting a Person Subject to S u b p o e n l l .(1) Avoitling Undu.e Bu.rdel! ·or Expense; Sanctians. A party or

attorney responsible for issu.lng and serving a subpoena mus1 m.ke

reasonable steps to a v o ~ d imposing undue burden or t:Xpense on &

person !>llbject to the :subpoena. The issuing court must enforce rhis

duty and impose an·appropdate sanction- which may include lostearning;; and reasomible attorney's fees- on & party or attorneywho .fuils to comply.

(2) Com11umd to P,qduce Mareriafs or Fermlt l!tspectlon.(A} AppearanceNot Required. A person commanded lo produce

documents, eleetronically stored infonnatioo, or tangible things, otto permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at theplace of production or inspection unless also comtnandcd to appearfor a dep\}sit,!Qn, hearing, or r i ~ l .

(B) Objectz'ons. A persOn commanded to produce documents ortangible things-or to pcn:nit inspection may serve on the party orattorney designated in the subpoena a written objection toinspecting, «opy.!ni, testing or sampling any or all of the materials -orto inspeciing·the premises- or to ·produci·ng elcctronica'Hy storedin'fonnation in the form or forms requested. The objection must beserved before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14-

days .after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, thefollowing rules apply:

(i) At any time, on notice to rhe commanded person, the servingparty may move the issuing court for an order compelling productionor inspection.

(Ji) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, andthe o r d ~ r must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party'sofficer from significant expense resulting from compliance.

(3) Quashing or ModifYing a Subpoena.(A) When Required. On timely mo1ion, the issuing court must

quash or modiO' a subpoena that;(i) ·fails to allow a reasonable time to comply;

(if) requires a- pen-on who is neither a party nor a party's officerto travel .more than l 00 miles from where tha t person resides, isemployed,w .regll.larly transacts business-in ·person·- except that;subject-to ·Rule 45(c)(3 )(B)(iii), the person may be commanded to

a t ~ j J . ~ , i : J : i a l by traveling from any such place witliin the i a t e wherethe trlal is held;

(ji l) .rcqujres,qlsc:Josure of.prjviJcgcd or other prolccted matter, i fno cxception -or waiver applies; or

( ! ~ ) su:hjecls a person to undue bur.dcn..(B) When Permi(ted. To protect a person subject to or atTected by ·

a s u ~ p o B n a , the issuing court may. on motion, quash or modifY thesubpoena if.it requires:

(i) disclosinga i'ade sec.ret or ·other confidential research,development, orc.ommercial information;

{ii) disclosing an unreti!lncd expert's opinion or informetion thatdocs not describe specific occurrences in disputeand results from

the expert's study that was not requested by a party; or(iii) a person who is neither a party nor a party's officer to incur

substantial expense to travel more than 100 miles to auend trial.

(C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstances

described in Rule 45(c)(J)(B), rhc court may, instead ofquashing·ormodifying a subpoena, order appe8rance or production underspccifi.ed conditions if the serving party,

(i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material thatcannot be othenvise met without undue l1<1rdship; and

{ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonablyc o m p e n s ; ~ r e d

·- ··--- - - - -- --

(d) u t i ~ s .il) Responding to a Subpoena.

(l ) Froductng Documents or E/ectronicalfy Stored Tnformntion.These proceou.res apply to producing documents or electronically

s t o ~ d information:

(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce

documents must -produce them as they are keptln the ordinarycourse of business or·rr.mstorganize and label them 10 correspond to

the categories in ·t'he.dcmand.(.B) Formfor r o t / ~ t c i n g Elecrronic(Il/y Stored Information Not

Specified. f f a subpoena docs not specify n form for producingelectronically stored information, the person responding mustproduce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or

in r e l i . S 9 n a b l y · u s a b l e form or forms.(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One

F o ~ P i . p e ~ S o n responding need not produce the sameeiccimnically stored information in more than one form .

([!) lngccessible ElectronicallySrored lnforma({on. The personresponding need not provide d'iscovery of electronically storedirifoi:mation from sources that the person identifies m; not rel!.sonnblyaccessible because of und.ue burden or cos\. On motion to compeldiscovery or for a protective order, the person responding must show

that the Information is not reasonably accessible because of undueburdefl Qr c.qst. Jf.tf!at showing is made. the court may nonethelessor.derdiscovery from such sources if the requesting party shows

g o ~ d cause; con.sidering the limitations of Rule :Z6(b)(2)(C). Thecourt may specifY conditions for the discovery.

(2} Claiming Pri)Jifege or Prdtectlim.{A) Information Withheld A person withholding s u b p o e n ~ e d

information umler a claim that ills privileged or subject toprotection as trial-preparation material must:

(i) expressly make the claim; and(ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents,

communications, or tangible things in a manner tl)lll, withoutrevealing information itsdf privileged or protected, wll! enable theparties to assess the cll!im.(B} Information Procfuced lf information produced in response·to · a

subpoena i& subject_ to·a claim of privilege or of protection as tri&l·

preparation material, :the person making the claim may notify anyp ~ J 1 Y that received the information of the claim and the basis for it.A_tter heing notified, a party must promptly return, scquestcr; .ordestroy the specified information ·and any copies it has; must nor use

o; dis(!lose ihto.lnformatioJ! until the claim is resolved; mUst:Uikereaso·oable step·s to retrieve the inforhlation iflhe party disclosed it

bt:(C?rc Jle.i.ng 1.1olified; and may promptly prescnl the information to

coun tinder seal for a determination of the claim. The person\vho pf!XIuced the information must preserve the informution untilthe clalm is resolvt:d.

(e) Contempt . The Issuing-court may hold in contqnpt a personwhO, l i ~ v i n g · l < ! ! c n served, fails without adequate excuse to obey thesubpoel)a. A nenpBrty's failure to obey must be excused if the

s u ~ j i o c n a p u r p o r t s to require the nonparty to attend or produce at aplace outside the limits of Rule 45(c)f3)(A)(ii).

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-3 Filed 07/26/13 Page 4 of 11 PageID 1575

Page 41: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 41/47

EXHIBIT A

All written agreements, subsequent to January 1, 2007, relating to litigation against any

Scientology affiliated entity, between Gray Robinson P.A. or Robert Johns.on, and any

of the forlowing individuals or entities: Mike Rinder, M ~ r t y Rathbun; Hohald ·Weil, Wei!·&

Quaranta, P.A., Theodore Babbitt, ,Babbitt, Johnson, ·O.?POrn.e & L e C i a i n c . t : ~ e ~ I ? : A . ,Morgan & Morgan, Brian Leu·ng, ·H6lcomo &.Leung, Luis Garcia, andTor:Mada Garcia.

All evidence of communications, including notes, affidavits, r:ecordings, tii:ne re.cords,

emails and correspondence, subseq·uent to January 1, 20.07, relating to ·litigation against

any Scientology affiliated entity, between Robert Johnson or his agents, and of the

following individuals or entities: Mike Rinder, Marty Rathbun, Ronald Wail, Wei! &

Quaranta P.A. Theodore Babbitt, B a b b i t ~ Johnson, Osborne & Le Clainche P.A., Brian

Culkin, Morgan & Morgan, Brian Leung, Holcomb & Leung, Luis Garcia, and/or Maria

Garcia.

All evidence of communications , including notes, affidavits, recordings, time records,

emails, and correspondence, subsequent to January 1, 2007, relating to litigation

against any Scientology affiliated entity, between Mike Rinder or his agents, and any of

the:1oJiowing individuals or entities: Robert Johnson. Marty Rathbun, Gray Robinson

P;A., Ronald Wei!, Wei! & Quaranta P .A. Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt, Johnson, Osborne

& Le Clainche P.A., Morgan & Morgan; Brian Leung, Holcomb & Leung, Luis Garcia,

and/or Maria Garcia.

All evidence of commt..mications, im;;luding notes, affidavits_ recordings, .time recOrds,.

em ails and corresporfdence, s u b s ~ q u e n t to January 1, 2Q'07; relating to 1\tigatio'il against

any Scientology affiliated entity, b ~ t w e e n Marty R.athb.L/!Vbthis a g e n t ~ , f 1 ~ ( c ; I I J Y : < ? U h ~foilowing individuals·orentfties:·Rob€frt.Johns6ii·, i \ i H i < € . d ~ l i i C i ~ Ro.nald \tveH, Wei! &

Quaranta P.A. Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt, Johnson, Osborne & Le Clalnche P.A., Brian

Culkin, Morga·n & Morgan, Brian Leung, Holcomb & Leung, Luis Garcia, and/or Maria

Garcia.

All communications, including written agreements, notes, affidavits, recordings, checks,

recordings, emails, and correspondence; subsequent to January 1, 2007, relating to

payment of compensation·or remuneration of any kind to Mike Rinder, between any of

the following individuals or entities: Mike Rinder; Robert Johnson, Gray Robinson P A.,

Ronald Wei!, Weil & Quaranta P:A. Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt,.Johnson, Osborne & Le

Clainche P.A. Morgan & Morgan, Brian Leung, Holcomb & Leung, Luis Garcia, and/or

Maria G ~ r c i a

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-3 Filed 07/26/13 Page 5 of 11 PageID 1576

Page 42: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 42/47

All c p m m u n i c a t i o n ~ . including written agreements, notes, a f f i d ~ v i t s , recordings, . hecks,

recordings, emails., and correspoJ1dence, ~ u b s e q u e n t to January 1, 2007, r e l a t i n ~ to

payment of compensation r r e " r n i ) n ~ ~ a t i b h of any kind: to Marty Rathbun, betWeen any

of tl;le following ihdjviduals o(·ehtities: Marty R a t h b u n Mike Hinder, Robert -Johnson,

Gray Robinson P.A._, Ronald Wei!, Wei! &.Quaranta P;A. Theodore Babbitt,.Bapbitt,

Johnson, Osliorne &:Le Clainche P.A, Morgan & Morgan, Brlan Leung, Holcomb &

Leung, luis-Garcia, and/or Maria Garcia.

150'8884

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-3 Filed 07/26/13 Page 6 of 11 PageID 1577

Page 43: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 43/47

AO "88 _.{Rc;li'. 07fiQ) Subpoena to Appear ~ n d T e s t i f y at a Hearing or Trial m , ; ~ C i ~ i 1 1 1 c t l o n

UNITED STAlES DtSTRlCT CODRTf o r t h ~

- - . : . . . ~ c ! ~ l e ))istrict of Florida __

Luis Garcia Saz and Maria Del Rocio Burgo .Garcia )

)

)

)

)

Plaintiif

v. Civil Action No. 8:13-cv-00220cT-27TBM

____ ~ ~ : ~ ~ _ _ ? _ f _ S c _ i _ e ~ ~ ~ o g y Religious Trust, et - ' ' - - -De[end011t

SUBPQENA TO APPEAR AN.Q TESTIFY

AT A HEARING OR TRIAL IN A CiviL ACTION

To : Michael Rinder, 808 Bentwood Court, Palm Harbor, Rorida 34683

YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear in the United"States district court at the time; date, and place set forth below

to testify at a hearing or trial in this civil=action. When you arrive, you must remain at th e court until the judge ora court

officer a11ows you -to leave.

- - _ - s a m . G i o o o n s U i = i i t e C f " S t a t e S ' C o u f f f i O u s e- - - - - ·---·-·--;

c -

-N - -

--------1 ace . .

1'd . . F · ourtroom o .

, 801 N. F on a Ave,, Tampa, L •-- -· ··-------· ---- - -- .. .... . ............. .... . .------··---,L ____ . --- --- .. ·-. ·- - ..-----·---·------- ....· - - · - ..--. _____ ]Date ·and Time: 07/24/2013 9:00' am___ _ _____j

You must also bring with·you the fo11owing documents, electronically stored fnfdnnation, or objects (blank ifnotapplicable):

SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT ''A"

The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(c), relating _() your-protection as a person subject to a subpoena, and Fed.

R. 'CiV. ·P "45 (d) arid (e), ·:relating·to')'ci'iir tltit/ to resp<:>nl:I'to1hi-s ·s-u'l:ipoena:and the·'potential'consequences of not doing·

so, are attached.

Date: 06/28/2013

CLERK OF-GOTJRTORdil .  . .. ) (=/ ''

·-----······· -Signature pjCleJ'ko; Depuiy Clerk

. \ } ~ ·"'-- ______ -----.. _... · · · Aitorney !s sigiuiture

The name, address, e-mail, and h ~ l e p h o n e ri:uinber ofthe attorney representing (na.me ofpaNy) Church of Scientology F. lag

_____. . c ; .~ . . : . . . . ~ i c e Orgar!i?:<;Jti<?Ji, Inc.

F. Wallace Pope, Jr.

9 I I Chestnut Slleet, Clewwate1, FL 337·56

waHyp@jpfirm .com

Phone: 7.27-461-1818

, who issues on'eqiiests.this subpoena , are:

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-3 Filed 07/26/13 Page 7 of 11 PageID 1578

Page 44: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 44/47

: ~ . . .

AO ( ~ v . 0 7 / f O } Subpoena to _Appear am! Testify Hearing orTriaJ ·in.a,Civ!l Action (page 2)

Civil Action No. 8:13-cv-00220-I -27TBM

~ R O O F OF E R V : I C E(Tizis section should not-be ilet! with tile -courf.tuiles s required by Fer/. R. Civ. P. 45.)

This subpoena·for (name·.of ndividual and title, ifany)

was received by me on (date)

--- --- - - -- -

0 I served the subpoena by delivering a copy to the named person as follows ::------------------ ·--- - - - - - - ---- - - - - -on (date) ; or

0 I returned tfie subpoena unexecuted b e c a w ~

-- - --- - - - - - · - · · · · - - - - - ~ - - - - - -------- ------------

Unless the subpoena was issued on behalf of he United S t a t e s ~ < ; > r . - Q n ~ of :ts officers or g ~ r i t s ; I have also

tendered to the Witness fees for one day's attendance, and the-mileage allowed by law, in-the amount of

$

My fees-are $ for travel and $ for ser.vices, for a total of$ 0.00- ~ ~ - - - - -

rdeclare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date·:

Server's signature

···-···- -···- .. . ·· - - - -·---·---:-- -··- -- ·---- -· -·· -····- ···-·-··· ..f>rif1!e'r:l.iri!.1Tiq_ qnfj

- - - - - -- -- - ----------....,---------- - - - - - - · - ·----··Server ;s address

Additional information regarding attempted:·ser.vice, etc :

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-3 Filed 07/26/13 Page 8 of 11 PageID 1579

Page 45: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 45/47

~ ~ ; ; ' AD " " " ' ,.,., ' " ' " ' " ' ; : : : ; : : 7 : : ; ~ : : - ; , : , T : ; ~ ; : :;;:::::::<•> (Erreetivo I2il!07)

(c) Protecting a Person Subject to n Subpoena. (d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.

,

{1) w ~ l d i n g .Uudue Bunfen or Expe11se; Sanctions. A party or (1) Prorludirg Do.cuments or Electronically Stored I11fort1U1Jion.

attorney feSPOJ;lsible for issuing and serving a subpoena must take These:procedures apply to producing documents or electronically

reasonable.steps to avoid iinposing ·undue burden or expense on a stored information:

p.erson subjecfto subpoena. Th e issuing court must enforce this (A) Do.cuments. A person responding:to a subpoena to produce

dtily"-and il)'lpose an l!ppropriate sanction- which may include lost documents must produce them as they are kept in rhe ordinary course

enmings and reasonable attomey·s f ee s - on a party or :attorney of business or must.organ.ize and label them to correspond to the

who fails to cpmply. categories in the demand.

(2) Command to Protiw:e Materials o.rPermit llzspecfiou. (B} Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not(A) Appearant:e Not Requ;red .A person commandexi"to produce Specified. ·If a suQpqena does not specify a form for p r o d t ~ c i n gdocuments, electronicaily stored information, or tangible things; or electronically stored information, the person responding-must produce

to permit the< inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the it.in.a form or forp)s in which it is ordinarily ma:lntained or in a

place of production or inspection unless also comm anded to a p p ~ reas6nably usable form or forms.

for a deposition, hearing, or trial. (C) Electronically Stored Information.Produced in Only One Form.

(B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or The perso"n respondi ng need no t produce the same electronically stored

tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or information in more th.an one form.

attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to (D) Inaccessible Efeclronicqfty Stored Information. The person

i n s p ~ i n g . copying, resting or sampling-any or ali of the a t e ~ i a l s <;>r · e s p o n d i n g need not provide discovery ofelectronically stored

to inspecting the premises - ·or to productng electronically stored information from sources that the person ·identifies as not reasonably

informatjon in the fotm or forms requested. The objection must be accessible-because ·of undue burden cir cost. On motion to compel

serveq bef"ore the earlier of he time specified for compliance or l4 discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must show

days·aftecthe subp_cna is served. lf an objection is made, the that the ·.-information is not reasonably accessible because of undue

following rules apply: burden,or cost. If that showing is mnde, the court may nonetheless

(i) At any .time, on notice to the commanded person, the ?en>ing order discovery from such sources if he requesting party shows good

party may move th e issuing <..-ourt for an order compelling production cause, consider ing the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C) . The court mayor inspection. specify conditions for the discovery.

(li) These acts may be required on ly as directed in the order, -and (i)"Claiming Privilege or Protecrio11 .

the.order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party's (A) Information Wi/hhefd. A person withholding subpoenaed

officer ft'om significant expense resulting from compliance. informati.on under a claim that it is privileged or subject to protection

(3) Quashing or Moclijj>Jug tr Subpoeila. as trial-prep11.ration material must:

(A) Whe!'! Required. On timely motion, the issuing court must (I) e ~ p r e " s s 1 y make the claim; and

quash ·or modify a subpoena !hat {ii) d.escd.be.the nature of the withheld documents, communications,

(i) fails to allow & reasonable {ime to comply; or tangible things in a manner that, without rev.caling informaiion

(ii) requires -a person who is neither a party nor a party•s officer itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the

_to ravel more than I.OOmiles from where that person resides, is claim.

employed, or re"gti1afiy,i;(ansacts business in person- except that, ( ~ ) 1 ( 1 / o r m a t i o n . _ P r . o d u c e d . If information produced in response to a

subject r f i ~ .uk45(c)(JJ.(B)(iii), the person may be commanded to subpoena is subject o a claim of privilege or of protection as r i a l ~-!lttend a!!:ial t r a v ~ l i n g f r o m any such place within the state where p ~ _ a r a t i p n ! J i l l t ~ t i ? l . the person making the claim may notify-:my

tiie ·r.al Kheifl;' · · .. · · f : i ! ! r t . f ~ a ! ' " t c c c i i v ~ th e information ofthe ·claim and the basis .for. t

(Iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protectedmatter, if Afted>el.Dg.

nptified, a party must promptly reJurh, sequeSter, orno exception or waiver applies; or de.sJ:z:py tJ:ie-specified information and any copies it has: must not use

{iv) ~ u b j e c t J ? a person to undue burden. or. disc.lose the information until the claim is resolved; must take

(B} When P-ermitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by reasonable steps to.-n;trieve the infonnation if the pa.rty disclosed -it.

a subpoena, .the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modifY the before being j o t i f i ~ ; and may promp!ly present the inforrnalion:to the ·

subpoena ifitrequires: cci"ur.t·under seai fof a determination of he claim. The person who

(i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential r c s c a r d ~ p r o d u ~ e d the information mu st preserve the information until the claim

·development. or Cof!lmercial information; is resolved.

(ii) disclosing an unretained expert's opinion or information that

does not d ~ c r . i b e specific occurrences in dispute and results from

the expert's study that was not requested by a party; or

(iii) a person who is neither a pany nor a party ' s officer to incur

substantial·expense to travel more than I 00 miles to attend trial.

(CJ SpecifYing Conditions as an Alternative. In tl1e circumstances

described in Rule 45(c)(3)(B), the court may, instead ofquashing or

modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under

specified conditions if the serving pany;·a ubstantial need for the testimony or material that

cannot be ot!j.erwise me t withou t undue hard ship; and

(ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably

compensated,

{e) Conte111pt. i S ; > u i n ~ court may hold in contempr a person who,

having been se_r.Y.ed, f<iils without adequate excuse !"o obey the

subpoena .A uoripl!fly·s failure to obey must be excused if he

~ o p o e n i l purportslo require the nonparty to attend or produce at -a

place outside the-iiinits of Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii).

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-3 Filed 07/26/13 Page 9 of 11 PageID 1580

Page 46: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 46/47

Page 47: Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

7/29/2019 Garcia v Scientology - Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (Jul2013)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/garcia-v-scientology-plaintiffs-motion-for-protective-order-jul2013 47/47

All communications, includingvtri.tten agreements, notes, affidavits, recordings, checks;

recordings, emails, and c b r f ~ s p o n d e n c e , subsequent to .January 1, 2007, r e l a t i n ~ to

payment of compensation or remuneration of any Kind to Marty Rathbun, between any

of the following individuals or entities: Marty Rathbun_, Mike Rinder, Robert Johnson,

Gray Robinson P.A., Ronald Weil, Weil &-Quaranta P.A Theodore Babbitt, Babbitt,

Johnson, Osborne & Le Clainche P.A., Morgan &Morgan, Brian Leung, Holcomb &

Leung, Luis Garcia, and/or Maria Garcia.

1508884

Case 8:13-cv-00220-JDW-TBM Document 60-3 Filed 07/26/13 Page 11 of 11 PageID 1582