full presentation 10.12.17 - center for urban … · 2017-10-18 · 10/12/2017 1 center for urban...

23
10/12/2017 1 Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida A GIS Methodology for Evaluating Bus Stop Pedestrian Safety CUTR Webinar October 12, 2017 2 Study Purpose Identify bus stop locations with unsafe pedestrian behavior Identify common characteristics of these bus stops Develop safety improvement strategies

Upload: vudiep

Post on 10-Jul-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Full Presentation 10.12.17 - Center for Urban … · 2017-10-18 · 10/12/2017 1 Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida A GIS Methodology for Evaluating

10/12/2017

1

Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida

A GIS Methodology for Evaluating Bus Stop Pedestrian Safety

CUTR WebinarOctober 12, 2017

2

Study Purpose

• Identify bus stop locations with unsafe pedestrian behavior

• Identify common characteristics of these bus stops

• Develop safety improvement strategies

Page 2: Full Presentation 10.12.17 - Center for Urban … · 2017-10-18 · 10/12/2017 1 Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida A GIS Methodology for Evaluating

10/12/2017

2

3

Background

• Florida has national reputation for being pedestrian unfriendly

• 2016 Dangerous by Design Report

– Of the 20 most dangerous metropolitan areas for pedestrians

• 9 are in Florida.

• The first 7 are all in Florida

4

Background

• Study sponsored by FDOT District 4

• Focused on Palm Beach and Broward Counties

• 9,085 ped crashes statewide in 2015

– Broward ranked 2nd

– Palm Beach ranked 4th

FDOT District 4 Map

Page 3: Full Presentation 10.12.17 - Center for Urban … · 2017-10-18 · 10/12/2017 1 Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida A GIS Methodology for Evaluating

10/12/2017

3

5

If a picture is worth 1,000 words…

this photo summarizes the entire report

6

Study Approach

1. Use GIS to map ped crashes near bus stops

2. Rank the bus stops according to 3 variables

a) No. of crashes near the bus stop

b) Annual average daily traffic

c) On/offs at the stop

Page 4: Full Presentation 10.12.17 - Center for Urban … · 2017-10-18 · 10/12/2017 1 Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida A GIS Methodology for Evaluating

10/12/2017

4

7

Study Approach

3. Review police reports of all crashes near bus stops

4. Conduct Road Safety Audits of worst bus stop locations in Broward and Palm Beach

8

Data Sets and Sources

• 2011 to 2014 pedestrian crash data

– Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles

• Bus stop on/off data

– Broward County Transit and Palm Tran

• Annual Average Daily Traffic

– Florida Department of Transportation

Page 5: Full Presentation 10.12.17 - Center for Urban … · 2017-10-18 · 10/12/2017 1 Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida A GIS Methodology for Evaluating

10/12/2017

5

9

Step 1: Map pedestrian crashes in GIS

Palm Beach County Broward County

10

Step 1: Map pedestrian crashes in GIS

• Tested 100 and 300 foot buffers around bus stops

– 300 foot buffer resulted in too much duplication (i.e. crash associated with more than 1 bus stop)

– Went with 100 foot buffer

• 357 pedestrian crashes w/in 100 feet of BCT bus stops

• 196 pedestrian crashes w/in 100 feet of Palm Tran bus stops

Page 6: Full Presentation 10.12.17 - Center for Urban … · 2017-10-18 · 10/12/2017 1 Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida A GIS Methodology for Evaluating

10/12/2017

6

11

Step 2: Append ped crash data with bus stop and AADT data

Crash Report Crash Date

Day of 

Week

Crash 

Time Fatalities Alcohol Drugs

Weather 

Conditions

83922234 2/22/2013 Friday 02:14 PM 0 N N Clear

Light 

Conditions

Age 

Category

Speed 

Category

Bus Stop 

ID

Bus Stop 

Configuration Offs Ons AADT

Daylight 3 4 3180 N 8 16 36,500

12

Step 3: Rank bus stops

• Three weighted variables

– total pedestrian crashes within 100 feet of the bus stop (60%)

– AADT of the street where the bus stop is located (20%)

– average weekday bus passenger on/offs for the bus stop (20%)

• Each bus stop given a score of 0 to 100

– 0 was the worst

– 100 was the best

Page 7: Full Presentation 10.12.17 - Center for Urban … · 2017-10-18 · 10/12/2017 1 Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida A GIS Methodology for Evaluating

10/12/2017

7

13

Step 3: Rank bus stops

RANK

BUS 

STOP 

ID

TOTAL PED 

CRASHES 

(2011‐2014)

PED 

CRASH 

SCORE

MEAN 

AADT

AADT 

SCORE

BCT 

ON/OFFS

ON/OFF 

SCORE

COMBINED  

SCORE

1 1808 4 0.0 51,500 6.6 208 19.4 26.0

2 2136 3 20.0 57,000 5.1 434 18.8 43.9

3 257 3 20.0 55,500 5.5 128 19.6 45.1

4 1791 3 20.0 48,500 7.5 158 19.6 47.0

5 775 3 20.0 45,000 8.4 25 19.9 48.4

14

Data Results

• 18 of the 357 ped crashes w/in 100 feet of a BCT bus stop involved a bus patron (5%)

• 8 of the 221 ped crashes w/in 100 feet of a Palm Tran bus stop involved a bus patron (3.6%)

• Near side stops were not disproportionately unsafe

– 40% of BCT’s bus stops are near‐side

– 39% of the crashes involving a BCT bus patron (7 of the 18) occurred at a near‐side stop

Page 8: Full Presentation 10.12.17 - Center for Urban … · 2017-10-18 · 10/12/2017 1 Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida A GIS Methodology for Evaluating

10/12/2017

8

15

Data Results

• The single most recurring theme in the police reports was pedestrians crossing mid‐block outside the crosswalks

• This behavior was repeatedly observed by the Road Safety Audit team

16

Stakeholder Surveys

• Meant to solicit feedback from local agencies on the data findings

Page 9: Full Presentation 10.12.17 - Center for Urban … · 2017-10-18 · 10/12/2017 1 Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida A GIS Methodology for Evaluating

10/12/2017

9

17

Stakeholder Surveys

• Modified list of bus stops to be field reviewed based on local input

– Example: Palm Beach MPO had produced a list of pedestrian hot spots in its Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Study

18

Field Reviews

• Road Safety Audits – 5 intersections in Broward

– 5 intersections in Palm Beach

• Multi‐disciplinary team– CUTR

– FDOT

– Broward County Transit & PalmTran

– Broward County Traffic Engineering

– Palm Beach MPO

Page 10: Full Presentation 10.12.17 - Center for Urban … · 2017-10-18 · 10/12/2017 1 Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida A GIS Methodology for Evaluating

10/12/2017

10

19

Field Reviews

Reviewed connectivity to adjacent land uses Reviewed adequacy of street lighting

20

Field Reviews

Reviewed pedestrian signal lengthReviewed for ADA compliance

Page 11: Full Presentation 10.12.17 - Center for Urban … · 2017-10-18 · 10/12/2017 1 Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida A GIS Methodology for Evaluating

10/12/2017

11

21

Field Reviews

Reviewed pedestrian behaviorReviewed signage

22

Page 12: Full Presentation 10.12.17 - Center for Urban … · 2017-10-18 · 10/12/2017 1 Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida A GIS Methodology for Evaluating

10/12/2017

12

23

24

Page 13: Full Presentation 10.12.17 - Center for Urban … · 2017-10-18 · 10/12/2017 1 Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida A GIS Methodology for Evaluating

10/12/2017

13

25

26

Page 14: Full Presentation 10.12.17 - Center for Urban … · 2017-10-18 · 10/12/2017 1 Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida A GIS Methodology for Evaluating

10/12/2017

14

27

28

Page 15: Full Presentation 10.12.17 - Center for Urban … · 2017-10-18 · 10/12/2017 1 Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida A GIS Methodology for Evaluating

10/12/2017

15

29

30

Page 16: Full Presentation 10.12.17 - Center for Urban … · 2017-10-18 · 10/12/2017 1 Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida A GIS Methodology for Evaluating

10/12/2017

16

31

32

Page 17: Full Presentation 10.12.17 - Center for Urban … · 2017-10-18 · 10/12/2017 1 Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida A GIS Methodology for Evaluating

10/12/2017

17

33

34

Page 18: Full Presentation 10.12.17 - Center for Urban … · 2017-10-18 · 10/12/2017 1 Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida A GIS Methodology for Evaluating

10/12/2017

18

35

36

Page 19: Full Presentation 10.12.17 - Center for Urban … · 2017-10-18 · 10/12/2017 1 Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida A GIS Methodology for Evaluating

10/12/2017

19

37

Recommendations

• RSA Team made site specific recommendations– Improve street lighting

– Relocate a mid‐block crossing

– Add additional Yield to Pedestrian signs

– Add illuminated No Turn on Red sign

– Upgrade crosswalk markings

– Add leading pedestrian interval to pedestrian signal

– Add audible pedestrian signal

– Increase pedestrian signal timing

38

Recommendations

• RSA Team made 2 general recommendations

– Expand use of pedestrian barriers in the median

– Add sidewalk stencils near bus stops directing passengers to the crosswalk

Page 20: Full Presentation 10.12.17 - Center for Urban … · 2017-10-18 · 10/12/2017 1 Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida A GIS Methodology for Evaluating

10/12/2017

20

39

Pedestrian Barrier

Experimental barrier Oakland Park Blvd

40

Pedestrian Barrier

Page 21: Full Presentation 10.12.17 - Center for Urban … · 2017-10-18 · 10/12/2017 1 Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida A GIS Methodology for Evaluating

10/12/2017

21

41

Sidewalk StencilDuring the RSA in Palm Beach, the team saw this at a bus stop

42

Sidewalk StencilThat gave us the idea for this

Page 22: Full Presentation 10.12.17 - Center for Urban … · 2017-10-18 · 10/12/2017 1 Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida A GIS Methodology for Evaluating

10/12/2017

22

43

• Most important thing to come out of the study was not the specific recommendations but rather the process

• FDOT District 4 now has a systematic process for reviewing bus stop location safety

• GIS plays an important role in the process

• RSAs promote collaborative problem solving

44

Further Research

• Relative Safety of Far‐Side Bus Stops versus Near‐Side Bus Stops

– Research literature says far‐side stops are safer for pedestrians but potentially less safe for buses (rear‐ended collisions)

– Proposed research would look at the percentage of pedestrian crashes that occurred at near‐side bus stops versus the percentage of bus rear‐ended collisions at far‐side bus stops

Page 23: Full Presentation 10.12.17 - Center for Urban … · 2017-10-18 · 10/12/2017 1 Center for Urban Transportation Research | University of South Florida A GIS Methodology for Evaluating

10/12/2017

23

45

Contact Information

Brian Pessaro

Senior Research Associate

Center for Urban Transportation Research

University of South Florida

[email protected]

(813) 974‐5113