From: Sent: To: Cc:

Neelam

25 November 2013 07:48 Tomas Rek; M.Smith@maxfordham.com

Bruce Sounes; Paddy Glennon

Subject: RE: [Spam?] FW: Grenfell Tower- BREEAM pre-assessment to be revised

Follow Up Flag: Flag Status:

Categories:

Tom as

Follow up

Completed

1279 Grenfell

Apologies for not coming back to you. The message somehow got delivered to the Spam folder and I just picked it up.

I will be able to get the updated sheet to you by tomorrow as I have a couple of meetings today. But I will try today as well..

Once again apologies for the delay.

Best Regards Neelam

From: Tomas Rek [mailto:tomas@studioe.co.uk] Sent: 19 November 2013 13:01 To: 'Neelam'; M.Smith@maxfordham.com Cc: Bruce Sounes; Paddy Glennon Subject: [Spam?] FW: Grenfell Tower- BREEAM pre-assessment to be revised

Neelam,

Please find below a summary of the BREEAM categories and scoring achievable as I understand it. Can you please comment I let me know whether you require any additional information in order to update your assessment report. Will you be able to update for tomorrow's tender submission?

Matt, Can you please confirm Ene 03, Ene 07, Mat 03 (listed below)?

Thank you

Regards

Tom as

Hea 01 Daylighting MF confirmed that daylight is being lost with new proposal because of the deeper reveals and introduction of louvre in front of the 'kitchen' window.

Hence credits stay unavailable.

SEA00010012_0001 SEA00010012/1

Hea 02 Sound Insulation 1 (to 4- S.67% contribution) credits withheld

Acoustic separation between existing flats to be tested in order to achieve any credits.

No tests at the existing flats have been allowed for. Hence credit is currently unavailable.

Hea 03 Volatile Organic Compounds

1 credit likely to be achieved.

Hea 04 Inclusive Design 1 credit likely to be achieved but support needed through an Access Statement.

Hea OS Ventilation 2nd credit not achievable because existing flats' bathrooms remain existing ventilation strategy- confirmed by MF

Hea 06 Safety

Existing flats are not receiving new smoke detectors. Hence credit cannot be awarded.

Ene 011mprovement in Energy Efficiency Rating

MF confirmed that previous results are still valid and therefore credits can still be assumed achievable.

Ene 02 Energy Efficiency Rating Post Refurbishment

MF confirmed that previous results are still valid and therefore credits can still be assumed achievable.

Ene 03 Primary Energy Demand

MF to confirm

Ene 04 Renewable Technologies

N/A

Ene OS Energy Labelled White Goods

N/A

Ene 06 Drying Space

N/A

Ene 07 Lighting

Can at least External lighting specification reward 1 credit?- MF to confirm

Ene 08 Display Energy Devices

N/A

Ene 09 Cycle Storage

Scope of cycle storage being provided does not cover BREEAM requirement to achieve a credit.

Ene 010 Home Office

N/A

Wat 011nternal Water Use

N/A

Wat 02 External Water Use

1 credit achievable as the flats have no individual garden space and the residents have no access to a communal

garden space.

Wat 03 Water Meter

N/A

2

SEA00010012_0002 SEA00010012/2

Pal 01 NOx emissions

Credits are achievable- Boilers will be specified with less than 40mg NOx/ kWh emissions.

Pal 02 Surface Water Runoff 1 credit assumed because the refurbishment is expected to have a neutral impact on the surface water run-off- this

credit needs to be confirmed by the appropriate hydrology consultant detailed within a Flood Risk Assessment.

Pal 03 Flooding 2 credits pending on commission of Flood Risk Assessment

Mat 01 Environmental Impact of Materials Roof: No alterations are proposed to the existing roof

External Walls- rainscreen cladding: Type: drained and back ventilated Backing wall: Reinforced concrete, brickwork, SFS

Thermal Insulation: Zero ODP rigid polyisocyanurate insulation board. BRE Green Guide rating A+. Celotex FRSOOO

aluminium foil faced both sides. Conductivity: 0.021W/mK. 100mm thick for columns. 150mm thick for walls/

spandrel panels.

Secondary support/framing system: Aluminium vertical rails with fixing brackets on thermal break spacers.

RAINSCREEN CLADDING: TO COLUMNS & EXTERNAL ENVELOPE OF MAIN ENTRANCE CANOPY:

PROTEUS HR honeycomb rainscreen panel by KME Architectural Solutions

RAINSCREEN CLADDING: [GENERALLY. FIRST FOUR FLOORS ELEVATIONS & INTERNAL ENVELOPE OF MAIN

ENTRANCE CANOPY & CANOPIES IN GENERAL:

Pvdf paint finish coil-coated aluminium CGL Wall plank System

RAINSCREEN CLADDING ALTERNATIVES TO BE CONSIDERED: Reynobond- Duragloss 5000:

o Metallic std & non-std (Satin gloss)

o Brushed aluminium

o Chameleon

o Anodised Look

Alucobond:

o Spectra, Sakura 917

New Internal Walls: Metal stud plasterboard partitions

Manufacturer: British Gypsum

Blockwork in Boxing Club:

Hem elite Paint Quality by Topblock. 140mm thick.

Ground Floor: -Main entrance and Boxing Club Entrance Lobby- approx. 80mm new screed with underfloor heating over approx.

100mm new insulation over existing bitumen waterproofing over exiting RC slab. Proposed ceramic tile finish. -Nursery and Offices- approx. 10 to 40 mm levelling screed over existing screed and brick build up over existing RC

slab

New Upper Floors: - 130mm thick concrete composite deck Comflor CF51 with mesh reinforcement+ approx. 75mm screed - 275mm thick insitu reinforced concrete slab (at Walkway +11evel)

3

SEA00010012_0003 SEA00010012/3

-Boxing Club (at Walkway level)- New 14mm thick oak timber sprung flooring by Boen Uk Ltd. Boards are Unilin Clic self-locking, glue-less joints along length and X-Press lock system. Substrate: new plywood floating floor comprising

2 layers 18 mm ply, glued and screwed. 100XSO battens on at 600mm centres. Resilient layer: Supplier Reference:

Mason UK, MFS-150 (yellow) Spring Floor Mounts, nailed to battens at 600mm intervals

Windows: Polyester powder-coated double glazed

Manufacturer: Wicona- UK

Product reference: Wicline 65 evo minimum U-value 1.6W/m2K

Curtain Wall: Polyester powder-coated double glazed

Manufacturer: Wicona- UK

Product reference: WICONA WICTEC 50

minimum U-value 1.6W/m2K

Mat02 Responsible Sourcing of Materials Syntegra's note: lt has been assumed that 4 No credits will be achieved since majority of the materials used will be

responsibly sourced as stated in the Sustainability and Energy statement prepared by the M&E Consultant.

Mat 03 Insulation

The specified insulation for architectural elements is A+ rated. MF to confirm A+ rating is specified for the insulation around services?

From: Neelam [mailto:np@synteqra-epc.co.uk] Sent: 29 October 2013 15:36 To: Tomas Rek Cc: Bruce Sounes; Paddy Glennon; M.Smith@maxfordham.com; Rallou Nikolaou Subject: RE: Grenfell Tower - BREEAM pre-assessment to be revised

Tom as

Please find below my comments in Red .

I hope that clarifies your query.

Could you also please forward me the tender documents being created, as and when available, just to have a quick skim through to make sure all BREEAM requirements are included. As can be seen from the pre-assessment we are

very much at the brink of the GOOD rating and so we need to make sure we do not lose any credits.

Please could you also forward me a copy of the final planning decision notice. I believe a GOOD rating has been accepted by the council. But I would like to confirm the same.

Please also issue the latest set of drawings for our records.

Thanks and Regards Neelam

From: Tomas Rek [mailto:tomas@studioe.co.uk] Sent: 25 October 2013 16:26

4

SEA00010012_0004 SEA00010012/4

To: 'np@syntegra-epc.co.uk' Cc: Bruce Sounes; Paddy Glennon; 'M.Smith@maxfordham.com' Subject: RE: Grenfell Tower - BREEAM pre-assessment to be revised

Dear Neelam,

Grenfell Tower- Regeneration scheme

I believe you were previously in contact with my colleague Bruce with regards to this project. I went through your pre-assessment document Rev C and would like to make few comments.

The design has developed slightly since, and further information is available which will help to confirm few

uncertainties stated in your current assessment. I will liaise with Max Ford ham to obtain further information for the

relevant sections.

We need to issue your assessment with all the tender documentation mid November. Can I please ask you then to target l11

h November for a submission to us?

Mat 01 Environmental Impact of Materials Syntegra's note: lt has been assumed that 19No credits {4.44% contribution) will be achieved since all materials will have a green guide rating of at least A+{3} as it is stated in the Sustainability and Energy statement prepared by the M&E Consultant.

Is there any record supporting the statement above?

Can you please advise about A+ (3) ratings and above. I am not familiar with anything above A+.

We currently do not have all the material specifications (wall makeup/ roof makeups etc.) Once these are supplied we will be able to run the MA TOI calculator and confirm the number of credits. We will also need the areas of all these elements.(eg: existing walls : xxxm2, new walls (build-up) : yyym2 etc.) Mat 03 Insulation Syntegra's note: lt has been assumed that all the new insulation installed will have an insulation index of greater than 2. lt is also assumed that 80% of the insulation will be responsibly sourced. (Rockwool or similar) 8 credits

assumed (1.42% contribution)

Index greater than 2 .. . ? Does this mean twice as much new insulation than existing?

Insulation is calculated by using an area weighted ratio of all new insulation which is A+ rated as compared to A rated insulation. So if we can make sure that all new insulation in the build (insulation in walls, roofs etc. as well as the building services insulation is A+ rated we will achieve the required credits) Was 02 Refurbishment Site Waste Management Syntegra's note: (total project cost is assumed to be lower than £300K}

Is the statement above correct? The whole scheme budget is obviously much higher.

In that case we will need to update the report. I will issue updated copy. This will change the requirements to achieve the 3 credits. Pol 02 Surface Water Runoff Syntegra's note: The refurbishment is expected to have a neutral impact on the surface water run-off lt is expected that detailed calculations will be undertaken at design stage by the Flood Risk consultant and these will be detailed with the FRA. Hence 1 No. credit has been assumed.

Probably no credits can be gained through new external paving being pervious as opposed to existing tarmac over brick over mortar bed- can you please advise?

Any new permeable paving would fare better than non-permeable paving. However as mentioned within the pre-assessment, this credit needs to be confirmed by the appropriate hydrology consultant.

Thank you

If you have any queries please feel free to contact me.

Kind regards

Tom as

5

SEA00010012_0005 SEA00010012/5

Tomas Rek

Architect

For and on behalf of

STUDIO E LLP

Palace Wharf, Rainville Road London W6 9HN T F 1 www.studioe.co.uk

TiiflQ'li'IN"!!IIJ.'ili'.UM fO~ IMII •H<U

lilf-lii>IYLI f>M-1 iloJHI

Queen's Award for Enterprise: Sustainable Development 2010 BCSE Award School Architect of the Year 2008 & 2010 BCSE Award Inspiring Design Primary School 2008 & Academy 2010 BSF Award Excellence in Student Engagement 2009 Sustainable City Award 2009

J;j Please consider the environment before printing this email.

ELECTRONIC INFORMATION TRANSFER DISCLAIMER

This email and any files transmitted with it are sent for and on behalf of Studio E LLP and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender. All attached files are copyright and may only be used for the purpose stated in the drawing status box. In the event that the files are altered in anytVay, it is a condition of use that the Studio E name and logo be removed from the modified file, unless prior written agreement has been obtained. Studio E will assume no responsibility for the accuracy, adequacy, and integrity of the files, and recommends that the files be thoroughly screened for viruses prior to installation. Opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this message are not given or endorsed by Studio E LLP unless otherwise indicated by an authorised representative independent of this message.

From: Bruce Sounes Sent: 23 October 2013 16:12 To: Tomas Rek Subject: FW: Grenfell Tower- Scope

From: Neelam [mailto:np@synteqra-epc.co.uk] Sent: 01 July 2013 12:24 To: 'BOOTH Philip'; marc.watterson@ibiqroup.com; Bruce Sounes Cc: pdunkerton@kctmo.orq.uk; dqibson@kctmo.orq.uk; pmaddison@kctmo.orq.uk; alan@synteqra-epc.co.uk Subject: RE: Grenfell Tower - Scope

All

Further to the changes to the heating systems, please find an updated BREEAM pre-assessment report for planning.

lt has been updated in accordance with the Sustainability and Energy Statement.

Please let me know if you have any queries with regards to the same.

Thanks and Regards

Neelam

6

SEA00010012_0006 SEA00010012/6

From: BOOTH Philip [mailto:philip.booth@appleyards.co.uk] Sent: 28 June 2013 10:43 To: Marc Watterson (marc.watterson@ibiqroup.com) (marc.watterson@ibiqroup.com); Bruce Sounes Cc: np@synteqra-epc.co.uk; pdunkerton@kctmo.orq.uk; dqibson@kctmo.orq.uk; Peter Maddison (pmaddison@kctmo.orq.uk) (pmaddison@kctmo.orq.uk) Subject: FW: Grenfell Tower- Scope

Marc and Bruce,

Please find attached updated sustainability and energy statement for planning resubmission next week. This is adjusted to reflect the value engineered heating system agreed within the brief (gas boilers).

Kind regards

Philip

From: M.Smith@maxfordham.com [mailto:M.Smith@maxfordham.com] Sent: 27 June 2013 12:55 To: BOOTH Philip Cc: d.campbell@maxfordham.com; m.palmer@maxfordham.com Subject: RE: Grenfell Tower - Scope

Afternoon Philip

Please find attached the updated Sustainability and Energy Statement for submission to planning.

Kind regards,

Matt

MAX FC)RDHAM 42-43 Gloucester Crescent London NW17PE T F maxfordham.com

Max Fordham LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership. Registered in England and Wales Number OC300026 Registered office 42-43 Gloucester Crescent, London, NWl 7PE

From: BOOTH Philip <(1h ili (1 .booth@a(1(11eyards.co.uk> To: 'M.Smith@maxfordham.com" <M.Smith@maxfordham.com>, Cc: 'd.cam(1bell @maxfordham.com" <d.cam(1bell @maxfordham.com>, "m. (1al mer@maxfo rdham.com" <m.(1almer@maxfordham.com> Date: 26/06/2013 17:05 Subject: RE: Grenfell Tower- Scope

7

SEA00010012_0007 SEA00010012/7

Matt,

Please find attached the revised brief for the project. Th is was a deliverable following the value engineering exercise we reviewed on 9th May. The point of greatest interest will be the table showing which value engineering options have been accepted by TMO (and which haven't) and which additions they would like to include. The value engineering options that are not included have been disregarded by TMO e.g. changing windows, cladding, including the kitchen and bathroom upgrade.

Thank you for your support on the sustainability statement.

You will note my previous email to Syntegra re: BREEAM report.

Kind regards

Phi lip

From: M.Smith@maxfordham.com [mailto:M.Smith@maxfordham.com] Sent: 26 June 2013 09:56 To: BOOTH Philip Cc: d.campbell@maxfordham.com; m.palmer@maxfordham.com Subject: Grenfell Tower - Scope

Morning Philip

I am in the process of preparing the updated Sustainability and Energy Statement for planning

resubmission. In order for this to tie up with the full planning application would you be able to provide me

with the updated project scope? You mentioned that this had been signed off during our conversation last

week but it is yet to materialise.

Could you also ensure that if the BREEAM assessor requires any information from us for the new pre­

assessment that he contacts me before the end of the week? I will be away from 01/07 to 10/07 and will

therefore be unable to respond next week.

Kind regards,

Matt

MAX FC)RDHAM 42-43 Gloucester Crescent London NW17PE T F m

Max Fordham LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership. Registered in England and Wales Number OC300026 Registered office 42-43 Gloucester Crescent, London, NWl 7PE[attachment "Draft Revised Brief.docx" deleted by Matt Smith/MaxFordham]

This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

8

SEA00010012_0008 SEA00010012/8

This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

No virus found in this message. Checked by A VG- www.avg.com Version: 2012.0.2242 I Virus Database: 322216280- Release Date: 10125/13

This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

No virus found in this message. Checked by A VG- www. avg.com Version: 2012.0.2247 I Virus Database: 362916348- Release Date: 11/19/13

9

SEA00010012_0009 SEA00010012/9