FRM/EDPD/557

C A R I B B E A N E X A M I N A T I O N S C O U N C I L

CARIBBEAN ADVANCED PROFICIENCY EXAMINATION®

EXTERNAL MODERATOR’S REPORT

PHYSICS

(This record is confidential and must be kept secure.)

For Use By

External

Moderator

NAME OF CENTRE: ______________________________________________________________________________

CENTRE NO.:________________________________________________________________________________

NUMBER OF CANDIDATES IN TEACHING GROUP:_____________________________________________

CLASS TEACHER’S NAME: _______________________________________

CLASS TEACHER’S SIGNATURE: __________________________________ DATE: _________________

EXTERNAL MODERATOR’S NAME: _________________________________

EXTERNAL MODERATOR’S SIGNATURE: ___________________________ DATE: _________________

PRINCIPAL’S NAME: –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

PRINCIPAL’S SIGNATURE: _______________________________________ DATE:_________________

Revised 10 February 2017

EXTERNAL MODERATOR’S REPORT

(Please place a tick () in the appropriate boxes and write your comments in Section 3.)

1. PROVISION OF EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS 3. EXTERNAL MODERATOR’S COMMENTS

(a) Equipment and materials provided for students were

UNIT 1 UNIT 2 Comment/Irregularity

Adequate ≥ 12 laboratory exercises completed ≥ 12 laboratory exercises completed

≥ 12 laboratory exercises marked ≥ 12 laboratory exercises marked

Inadequate

9-11 laboratory exercises completed 9-11 laboratory exercises completed

9-11 laboratory exercises marked 9-11 laboratory exercises marked

(b) Space provided for individual work by each student was

Adequate 6-8 laboratory exercises completed 6-8 laboratory exercises completed

6-8 laboratory exercises marked 6-8 laboratory exercises marked

Inadequate

< 6 laboratory exercises completed < 6 laboratory exercises completed

< 6 laboratory exercises marked

< 6 laboratory exercises marked

2. CLASS TEACHER’S ASSESSMENT

(a) Students had adequate and appropriate guidance from the teacher

Yes

No

(b) Students’ work was assessed in accordance with the guidelines

provided in the CXC syllabus

Yes

No

(c) Teacher’s assessment was

Satisfactory

Too lenient

Too severe

Inconsistent

To be sent to the Local registrar for submission to CXC