FRM/EDPD/372 CARIBBEAN EXAMINATIONS COUNCIL ?· frm/edpd/372 caribbean examinations council advanced…

Download FRM/EDPD/372 CARIBBEAN EXAMINATIONS COUNCIL ?· frm/edpd/372 caribbean examinations council advanced…

Post on 29-Aug-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents

4 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • FRM/EDPD/372

    CARIBBEAN EXAMINATIONS COUNCIL

    ADVANCED PROFICIENCY EXAMINATIONS

    MODERATION FEEDBACK REPORT ON SCHOOL BASED ASSESSMENT

    FOOD AND NUTRITION UNIT 1 RESEARCH PAPER

    Name of Centre: Centre Code:

    Name of Teacher: Year of Examination:

    ADMINISTRATIVE DETAILS

    Yes No

    1. Marks for each sample were entered clearly and correctly.

    2. The names and/or registration numbers of candidates being examined were correctly indicated.

    3. A completed Moderation Form (FRM/EDPD/370) was submitted.

    APPROPRIATENESS OF ACTIVITY

    1. Assignment was relevant to the objectives in the Unit

    2. Assignment was appropriate for the level of the candidates.

    3. Assignment was related to problems or issues in the community.

    4. Assignment showed sufficient evidence of candidates individual work.

    5. Submissions could have been improved by:

    _________________________________________________________

    _________________________________________________________

    QUALITY OF CANDIDATES RESEARCH PAPER

    1. Problem statement was

    clearly stated not clearly stated

    2. Literature reviews were

    comprehensive satisfactory unsatisfactory

    3. The data collected was

    comprehensive adequate insufficient

    4. Experimental methods were clearly documented

    at all times sometimes rarely

    5. Experimental methods were repeated and modified

    at all times sometimes rarely

    6. Observations were accurately recorded

    at all times sometimes rarely

    7. Discussion was

    Comprehensive satisfactory unsatisfactory

    8. Conclusions drawn were related to the stated problem statement

    at all times sometimes rarely

    9. Conclusions drawn were related to the results of experiments conducted

    at all times sometimes rarely

    10. The overall quality of the research paper submitted was

    excellent satisfactory unsatisfactory

    Candidates performance could have been improved by

    ____________________________________________________________________________

    ____________________________________________________________________________

    QUALITY OF TEACHERS MARKING

    The teachers marking of the assignments was

    acceptable severe lenient inconsistent

    The teacher followed the marking criteria. Yes No

    Candidates scores were clearly shown for each

    of the criteria set out in the mark scheme. Yes No

    OTHER COMMENTS

    __________________________________________________

    __________________________________________________

    __________________________________________________

    __________________________________________________

    __________________________________________________

    __________________________________________________

    __________________________________________________

    __________________________________________________

    __________________________________________________

    __________________________________________________

    __________________________________________________

    __________________________________________________

    __________________________________________________

    __________________________________________________

    Moderators Initials: ____________________ Chief/Assistant Chief Examiners Initials: ________________________

    Examiners Initials: _____________________ Date: ______________________________________________________ Revised April 2017

Recommended

View more >