FRM/EDPD/372 CARIBBEAN EXAMINATIONS COUNCIL ?· frm/edpd/372 caribbean examinations council advanced…

Download FRM/EDPD/372 CARIBBEAN EXAMINATIONS COUNCIL ?· frm/edpd/372 caribbean examinations council advanced…

Post on 29-Aug-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents

4 download

Embed Size (px)

TRANSCRIPT

<ul><li><p>FRM/EDPD/372 </p><p>CARIBBEAN EXAMINATIONS COUNCIL </p><p>ADVANCED PROFICIENCY EXAMINATIONS </p><p>MODERATION FEEDBACK REPORT ON SCHOOL BASED ASSESSMENT </p><p>FOOD AND NUTRITION UNIT 1 RESEARCH PAPER </p><p>Name of Centre: Centre Code: </p><p>Name of Teacher: Year of Examination: </p><p>ADMINISTRATIVE DETAILS </p><p> Yes No </p><p>1. Marks for each sample were entered clearly and correctly. </p><p>2. The names and/or registration numbers of candidates being examined were correctly indicated. </p><p>3. A completed Moderation Form (FRM/EDPD/370) was submitted. </p><p>APPROPRIATENESS OF ACTIVITY </p><p>1. Assignment was relevant to the objectives in the Unit </p><p>2. Assignment was appropriate for the level of the candidates. </p><p>3. Assignment was related to problems or issues in the community. </p><p>4. Assignment showed sufficient evidence of candidates individual work. </p><p>5. Submissions could have been improved by: </p><p>_________________________________________________________ </p><p>_________________________________________________________ </p><p>QUALITY OF CANDIDATES RESEARCH PAPER </p><p>1. Problem statement was </p><p> clearly stated not clearly stated </p><p>2. Literature reviews were </p><p> comprehensive satisfactory unsatisfactory </p><p>3. The data collected was </p><p> comprehensive adequate insufficient </p><p>4. Experimental methods were clearly documented </p><p> at all times sometimes rarely </p><p>5. Experimental methods were repeated and modified </p><p> at all times sometimes rarely </p><p>6. Observations were accurately recorded </p><p> at all times sometimes rarely </p><p>7. Discussion was </p><p> Comprehensive satisfactory unsatisfactory </p><p>8. Conclusions drawn were related to the stated problem statement </p><p> at all times sometimes rarely </p><p>9. Conclusions drawn were related to the results of experiments conducted </p><p> at all times sometimes rarely </p><p>10. The overall quality of the research paper submitted was </p><p> excellent satisfactory unsatisfactory </p><p>Candidates performance could have been improved by </p><p>____________________________________________________________________________</p><p>____________________________________________________________________________ </p><p>QUALITY OF TEACHERS MARKING </p><p>The teachers marking of the assignments was </p><p> acceptable severe lenient inconsistent </p><p>The teacher followed the marking criteria. Yes No </p><p>Candidates scores were clearly shown for each </p><p>of the criteria set out in the mark scheme. Yes No </p><p>OTHER COMMENTS </p><p>__________________________________________________ </p><p>__________________________________________________</p><p>__________________________________________________</p><p>__________________________________________________</p><p>__________________________________________________</p><p>__________________________________________________</p><p>__________________________________________________</p><p>__________________________________________________</p><p>__________________________________________________</p><p>__________________________________________________</p><p>__________________________________________________</p><p>__________________________________________________</p><p>__________________________________________________</p><p>__________________________________________________ </p><p>Moderators Initials: ____________________ Chief/Assistant Chief Examiners Initials: ________________________ </p><p>Examiners Initials: _____________________ Date: ______________________________________________________ Revised April 2017 </p></li></ul>