foundation fieldbus - control in the field

39
© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation Presentation to Travis Hesketh Vice Chair Fieldbus Foundation EMEA VP PlantWeb Wireless Emerson Insert Client logo

Upload: jim-cahill

Post on 08-Jun-2015

1.947 views

Category:

Education


4 download

DESCRIPTION

Presented by Emerson's Travis Hesketh at the 2011 General Assembly in Mumbai, India on March 9-10. Download the file to get the full effect of the slide builds.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

Presentation to

Travis HeskethVice Chair Fieldbus Foundation EMEA

VP PlantWeb Wireless Emerson

Insert Client logo

Page 2: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

Fieldbus Foundation

IP development Promote

Digital

Interoperable

Vendor neutral

Automation focused

500 members/affiliates

Page 3: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

Digital Technology

PV = 392.8mb

IS interface I/O cardField JB +

marshalling

PV = 392.8mb

PV = 393.1mb

PV = 392.8mb

Fieldbus

4-20mA

Page 4: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

Proven Technology

Reduced Wiring and Installation

Proactive Maintenance

Greater Reliability

Tighter Control

Why

?

Page 5: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

Why

?

Proven Technology

Reduced Wiring and Installation

Proactive Maintenance

Greater Reliability

Tighter Control

Page 6: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

Foundation Fieldbus

600+

10

6,000

1,000,000+

registered devices

registered hosts

control systems

devices in service

Page 7: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

Registered Devices

600

400

200

Jan ’98

Jan ’00

Jan ’02

Jan ’04

Jan ’06

Jan ’08

Jan ’10

Registrations

New

Renewed

Page 8: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

Registered Devices

600+ Devices

10 Hosts

Page 9: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

1,000,000+

Market Momentum

Source: TBC

Projects

Devices

Page 10: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

Why

?

Proactive Maintenance

Greater Reliability

Tighter Control

Proven Technology

Reduced Wiring and Installation

Page 11: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

Reduced Wiring And Installation

IS IS IS IS

4-20 mA Fieldbus

Wiring

Space

Complexity

Commissiontime

Wiring

Space

Complexity

Commissiontime IS

Page 12: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

Why

?

Proven Technology

Greater Reliability

Tighter Control

Reduced Wiring and Installation

Proactive Maintenance

Page 13: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

Analogue

Page 14: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

Analogue

Page 15: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

Foundation Fieldbus

Page 16: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

Maintenance

Reactive/preventative

Intelligent

Page 17: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

Predictive Intelligence

Process variables

Wear

Installation

Machine health

Process variables

Asset optimisation

Page 18: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

Condition Based Monitoring

Failed instrument

Plugged lines

Zero off

Calibration shift

No problem

Routine check

63%

Page 19: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

Why

?

Proven Technology

Reduced Wiring and Installation

Greater Reliability

Proactive Maintenance

Tighter Control

Page 20: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

Control In The Field Study

Control in the Field:

Analysis of Performance Benefits

Page 21: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

Control In The Field

Page 22: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

Control In The Field

CIF enabled

Page 23: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

Comparison

CIF enabled

105

ms

Page 24: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

Comparison

CIF enabled

No CIF

125

625

105

ms

Page 25: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

Settling Times: Fastest Process

50

54

58

62

Process output (%)

0 4 8 12 16 20Time (seconds)

60%

Setpoint Case 1 - CIFCase 3 - Control in DCS (async)

Page 26: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

Settling Times: Very Fast Process

50

54

58

62

Process output (%)

0 4 8 12 16 20Time (seconds)

Setpoint Case 1 - CIFCase 3 - Control in DCS (async)

55%

Page 27: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

Settling Times: Fast Process

50

54

58

62

Process output (%)

0 4 8 12 16 20Time (seconds)

Setpoint Case 1 - CIFCase 3 - Control in DCS (async)

66%

Page 28: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

Settling Times: Medium Process

50

54

58

62

Process output (%)

0 4 8 12 16 20Time (seconds)

Setpoint Case 1 - CIFCase 3 - Control in DCS (async)

39%

Page 29: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

Presence Of Disturbance: Fastest Process

Process output (%)

40 50 60 70 80 90 100Time (seconds)

Setpoint Case 1 - CIFCase 3 - Control in DCS (async)

56

58

60

66

62

64

Page 30: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

Presence Of Disturbance: Different Processes

Fastest1.811

2.132

0.517

0.82

0.642

1.058

0.231

0.53

65% better

50% better

55% better

35% better

Very Fast

Fast

Medium

Setpoint CIF1.811 control in

DCS (async)

Page 31: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

Impact of Tighter Control Loop

Manual

PneumaticAnalogue

Digital

Control limit

Page 32: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

Recommended For Fast Loop Response

Control in the field usingFOUNDATION™ fieldbus technology is

recommended by SGSI for simple and cascading loops, not for complex loops.

Major benefits identified by SGSI are reduced process controller loading, reduced network traffic enabling more loops per segment, as

well as very fast loop response.

Page 33: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

Why

?

Proven Technology

Reduced Wiring and Installation

Proactive Maintenance

Greater Reliability

Tighter Control

Page 34: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

The Need For Reliability

ARC Insight

10th June 2010

The global process industry loses $20billion, or five percent of annual production, due

to unscheduled downtime and poor quality.

ARC estimates that almost 80 percent of these losses are preventable, with 40 percent largely

due to operator error.

Page 35: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

Reliability

PSU

PSU

Page 36: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

Reliability

Analogue

With CIF

15.9y

48.2y

MTTF

Page 37: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

Customer Experience

CIF enabled

Page 38: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

Customer Experience

FOUNDATION™ FieldbusCIF with inherent backup capability

prevented 2 incorrect plant shutdowns, which would have resulted from communication

interruptions.

Page 39: Foundation Fieldbus - Control in the Field

© 1999 - 2011 Fieldbus Foundation

Why

?

Proven Technology

Reduced Wiring and Installation

Proactive Maintenance

Greater Reliability

Tighter Control