fostering inclusive teaching: a systemic approach to develop faculty … · 2019-04-05 ·...

26
Fostering Inclusive Teaching: a Systemic Approach to Develop Faculty Competencies Janice Walker, Ph.D., VP for Institutional Diversity & Inclusion Diane Ceo-DiFrancesco, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Spanish and Former Faculty Director for Center for Teaching Excellence Mary Kochlefl, Ph.D., Assistant Provost for Online and Continuous Learning, Administrative Director for Center for Teaching Excellence

Upload: others

Post on 17-Apr-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Fostering Inclusive Teaching: a Systemic Approach to Develop Faculty Competencies

Janice Walker, Ph.D., VP for Institutional Diversity & Inclusion

Diane Ceo-DiFrancesco, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Spanish and Former Faculty Director for Center for Teaching Excellence

Mary Kochlefl, Ph.D., Assistant Provost for Online and Continuous Learning, Administrative Director for Center for Teaching Excellence

Agenda

Reasons and Goals for the Diversity & Inclusion Teaching Academy

Key Decisions

Academy Assessment

Self-Reflection on Your Campus Culture

Origin of the Academy

Diversity & Inclusion Strategic Plan

Goal 4: Promote and support diversity and inclusion education, scholarship and culturally responsive teaching to enrich the educational experience for all learners

Objective 4.2. Provide opportunities for faculty and staff to advance their cultural proficiency with respect to intercultural and race-related competencies (e.g. awareness, communication, engagement) and exposure to inclusive pedagogical models that will enhance the learning of all students.

Stakeholders

• President and Administration• Office of Institutional Diversity & Inclusion• Students• Center for Teaching Excellence• Gender & Diversity Studies Committee

Goals for the Academy

• Develop key faculty diversity competencies to be more responsive to the needs of an increasingly multicultural campus

• Address student requests that faculty be better prepared to support diverse populations and raise issues such as race and gender in the classroom

• Address faculty requests for better support so they are more comfortable meeting diverse student needs and facilitating challenging conversations in their classrooms

Key Decisions

How do we get faculty to participate?

Given this goal, discuss key decisions using scenarios provided….

What we did…initially….

Motivation• Piloted with early adopters• Working towards “expectation”

– Engaging deans, associate deans, chairs– Including in annual review process– Recognizing with certificates, at events

• Paying adjuncts for participating• Motivating through quality, community

What we did…initially….

Format• Blended format, partially online

– Discussion Boards, In-Person

• Fit within one semester

Feedback from First Pilot

• Whole semester is too long• Content and activities sometimes too time-

consuming• Discussion board responses too long, in-

person sessions easier to manage• Some concerns about comfort in group

What we did…next….

• Divided into two semesters, approximately eight weeks each

• Increased in-person sessions• Opened with more discussion about group

expectations• Established separate group for administrators

Participation

120 Total Participants:

• 40 have completed the Academy (either the 14-week or two 8-week semesters)

• 52 have completed Semester One– 28 of these are currently enrolled in Semester Two

• 28 new participants started Semester One this spring

Participation

Fall 2017 • Two cohorts (26 participants started, 3 dropped)Spring 2018• Three Semester One cohorts: two faculty, one administrators

(37 started, 7 dropped)Fall 2018 • Three Semester One cohorts: two faculty, one administrators

(42 started , 2 dropped)• One Semester Two cohort (16 started, 3 dropped)Spring 2019 • Two Semester One cohorts (28 started, 2 dropped)• Three Semester Two: two faculty, one administrators

(28 started, 1 dropped)

Key Decisions

What kind of “diversity training?”

Given this goal, discuss key decisions using scenarios provided….

What we did…initially....

• Prioritized introspection, reflection and discussion

• Prioritized teaching strategies and competencies• Included Xavier-specific content such as climate

survey results and faculty presentations• Assigned Culture and Teaching Autobiography• Encouraged Daily Examen for Diversity as daily

practice• Cohorts led by facilitators

Learning Outcomes

First Pilot (Fall 2017, 14 weeks long)By the end of the Diversity and Inclusion Teaching Academy, you will be able to:• Identify your own cultural framework and its

effects on teaching and learning• Articulate a plan for fostering greater

inclusivity in your teaching• Facilitate students in critical dialogue related

to diversity and inclusion

How it looks

• Diversity and Inclusive Teaching Academy Canvas course

• Module 2: Privilege

Feedback from First Pilot

• Discussion board questions too broad, responses too long

• Some concepts dealt with too simplistically• Content needed greater diversity• Autobiography too much

What we did….next….

• Increased “diversity” content, particularly as foundation before focus on teaching

• Increased diversity of voices• Moved introspection and strategies into

second semester• Reframed discussion board questions to

include choices - related to content or based on personal experience

• Increased number of in-person sessions

Learning Outcomes

Second Pilot (Spring 2018 and Fall 2018)By the end of the Diversity & Inclusion Teaching Academy, you will be able to:• Semester One: Examine how structures and lived

experiences influence faculty's ability to effectively teach a diverse student body.

• Semester Two: Having reflected on your own cultural framework and its impact on your teaching practices, articulate strategies for fostering greater inclusivity in your teaching

Assessment

• Email survey – What do you recommend we keep?– What do you recommend we change?– Would you recommend any readings/assignments

for the future?

• Focus groups with participants • Survey (summative) • Pre- and Post-test

Survey Feedback

“Overall the Diversity and Inclusion Teaching Academy has been worth the time and effort I have invested.”

100% of participants strongly agreed or agreed(both semesters, N=60)

Survey Feedback

After completing the Diversity and Inclusion Teaching Academy….

Strongly Agreed or Agreed

Semester One(N=52)

Semester Two(N=8)

“Overall the Diversity and Inclusion Teaching Academy strengthened my knowledge about inclusivity and

diversity in the classroom.”98% 100%

“My understanding of Xavier’s mission related to diversity and inclusion has grown.” 88% 87%

71% 87%“The Diversity and Inclusion Teaching Academy

challenged my previously held assumptions about inclusivity and diversity in the classroom.”

After completing the Diversity and Inclusion Teaching Academy….

Strongly Agreed or Agreed

Semester One(N=52)

Semester Two(N=8)

“My ability to effectively teach a diversestudent body has been enhanced.” 92% 100%

71% 87%“The Diversity and Inclusion Teaching Academy

has provided me with specific strategies for addressing inequity in the classroom.”

Survey Feedback

Self-Assessment

• Complete a brief self-assessment survey focusing on your own institution.

Thank you!

Janice Walker, PhDVice President for Institutional Diversity and [email protected]

Diane Ceo-DiFrancesco, PhDFormer Faculty Director, Center for Teaching [email protected]

Mary Kochlefl, PhDAssistant Provost for Online and Continuous LearningAdministrative Director for the Center for Teaching [email protected]