forward tracking in a linear collider detector robin glattauer rudolf frühwirth winfried a....
TRANSCRIPT
Forward Tracking in aLinear Collider Detector
Robin Glattauer
Rudolf Frühwirth
Winfried A. Mitaroff
Annual Meeting of ÖPG-FAKT
Univ. Graz, 18–21 Sept. 2012
2
• Physics motivation• Experimental environment:
– International Linear Collider (ILC)– International Large Detector (ILD)
• Track reconstruction:– Strategy– Forward tracking– Performance
• Summary and outlook
Winni Mitaroff: ÖPG-FAKT21 Sept. 2012
Winni Mitaroff: ÖPG-FAKT21 Sept. 2012
Collisions at the TeV scale
3
Winni Mitaroff: ÖPG-FAKT21 Sept. 2012
Cross sections at the TeV scale
4
p p e– e+
Winni Mitaroff: ÖPG-FAKT
LHC ILCe– e+ Z H Z e– e+, H b b …
Example: simulated Higgs event
–
21 Sept. 2012 5
Winni Mitaroff: ÖPG-FAKT21 Sept. 2012
The International Linear Collider (ILC)
– 3 stages: collision energies 250 GeV (“Higgs Factory”), 500 GeV, eventually 1 TeV (adjustable for scans in range 200 – 500 GeV);– Stability and precision of the beam energies to be below 0.1 %;– Peak luminosity of ≈ 2×1034 cm-2s-1, with an integrated luminosity of 500 fb-1 to be achieved within the first 4 years of operation;– Electron polarization at least 80%, positron polarization an option;– Options: Z0 factory (“GigaZ”), e–e–, e–γ, γγ (“photon collider”).
The ILC basic design is a worldwide consent since autumn 2004;Technology is based on superconducting RF cavities at 1.3 GHz,average field gradient is 31.5 MV/m in the first stages ≤ 500 GeV; The project is pursued by the “Global Design Effort” since 2005.
Beam crossing angle 14 mrad;Only 1 experimental zone with2 detectors operated in “push/pull”.
6
Winni Mitaroff: ÖPG-FAKT21 Sept. 2012
The International Large Detector (ILD)
• Central tracking detector: large TPC– excellent pattern recognition in a dense track environment,– proven technology;
• Silicon tracker: pixels and ss/ds strips– extended tracking coverage,– improved track momentum resolution;
• High-precision Si vertex detector– close (16 mm) to the beam interaction point,– best possible heavy flavour tagging;
• Fine-granularity calorimeters– particle flow (PFA) calorimetry is an asset,– provides necessary jet energy resolution;
• Solenoid magnetic field of 3.5 T– upgradable to 4 T (for the ILC 1 TeV stage);
• Almost 4π geometric acceptance– to the benefit of tracking & calorimetry.
Basic design parameters (ILD_00):
7
HEPHY Vienna is founding member of the ILD proto-collaboration.ILD is one of two ILC detector concepts “validated” by IDAG in April 2009.
Winni Mitaroff: ÖPG-FAKT21 Sept. 2012
The ILD silicon trackers
8
Domain of HEPHY Vienna’shardware contributions !
Winni Mitaroff: ÖPG-FAKT
ILD Forward Tracking Detector (FTD)
21 Sept. 2012 9
Winni Mitaroff: ÖPG-FAKT
Forward track reconstruction in ILD
21 Sept. 2012 10
Stage 1: Cellular Automaton (CA),Stage 2: Kalman Filter (KF),Stage 3: Hopfield Neural Network (HNN).
Embedded in ILD’s software framework Marlin.
New stand-alone software package ForwardTracking:
Fast semi-global track finding method: Takes all hits into account simultaneously, but
situation evolves based on local rules; Track segments interact with connected ones and are
tested for compatibility.
Stage 1: the Cellular Automaton (CA)
21 Sept. 2012 Winni Mitaroff: ÖPG-FAKT 11
Stage 2: the Kalman Filter (KF)
21 Sept. 2012 Winni Mitaroff: ÖPG-FAKT 12
Two main goals: Track parameter determination, Chi-squared probability gives feedback about
the track quality; Chi-squared probability cut value = 0.005; Algorithms called:KalTest + KalDet + MarlinTrk.
Note: an ultimate track fit by a KF + smoother will alsobe performed, after track search, on the final sample !
Stage 3: Hopfield Neural Network (HNN)
Ambiguity resolving:this is the last stage in forward track search;
Tracks sharing hits are incompatible:overlap comes from combinatorics in reconstruction
ghosts and clones:⇒
21 Sept. 2012 Winni Mitaroff: ÖPG-FAKT 13
How does the HNN work ?
Tracks are assigned a quality and an activation state, and they do dynamically interact;
Compatible tracks amplify each other, whereas incompatible ones weaken each other;
In order to prevent oscillation between states, updating is done asynchronously;
A global extremum is searched for – in order to avoid falling into a local one, an annealing scheme is used (by assigning the system a “temperature” being cooled down).
21 Sept. 2012 Winni Mitaroff: ÖPG-FAKT 14
ForwardTracking: new forward tracking package, SiliconTracking: old package (still used in barrel), TrackSubsetProcessor: combines results of both.
Performance: efficiency
21 Sept. 2012 Winni Mitaroff: ÖPG-FAKT 15
ForwardTracking: new forward tracking package, SiliconTracking: old package (still used in barrel), TrackSubsetProcessor: combines results of both.
Performance: ghost rate
21 Sept. 2012 Winni Mitaroff: ÖPG-FAKT 16
ForwardTracking: new forward tracking package, SiliconTracking: old package (still used in barrel).
Performance: processing time
21 Sept. 2012 Winni Mitaroff: ÖPG-FAKT 17
Background scaled conforming to the LoI with 500 GeV !
Conclusions and Outlook
A new software package for stand-alone track reconstruction in the forward region of ILD has been successfully developed and implemented;
It shows superior performance w.r.t. the old ILD software (originally developed for the barrel);
Our ForwardTracking package is on board for benchmark processing for ILD’s “Detailed Base-line Design” (DBD) report, due by Dec. 2012;
Our package will also be used for a modified ILD detector at the “Compact Linear Collider” (CLIC).
21 Sept. 2012 Winni Mitaroff: ÖPG-FAKT 18
Backup Slides
19Winni Mitaroff: ÖPG-FAKT21 Sept. 2012
Winni Mitaroff: ÖPG-FAKT
Toy detector: true tracks
21 Sept. 2012 20
True hits (green) + background hits (red)
21 Sept. 2012 Winni Mitaroff: ÖPG-FAKT 21
CA: building segments (“cells”)
21 Sept. 2012 Winni Mitaroff: ÖPG-FAKT 22
Winni Mitaroff: ÖPG-FAKT
CA: iteration #1 (red states)
21 Sept. 2012 23
Winni Mitaroff: ÖPG-FAKT
CA: iteration #2 (orange states)
21 Sept. 2012 24
Winni Mitaroff: ÖPG-FAKT
CA: iteration #3 (green states)
21 Sept. 2012 25
Winni Mitaroff: ÖPG-FAKT
CA: iteration #4 (blue states)
21 Sept. 2012 26
CA: after clean-up of bad states
21 Sept. 2012 Winni Mitaroff: ÖPG-FAKT 27
KF + HNN: final tracks found
21 Sept. 2012 Winni Mitaroff: ÖPG-FAKT 28
Two machine studies: ILC and CLIC
29Winni Mitaroff: ÖPG-FAKT21 Sept. 2012
The CERN Linear Collider Detector Project: adapting the ILC detector concepts for the higher CLIC energies (CLIC_ILD, CLIC_SiD), and using the software developed by the ILC collaborations for simulation and optimization studies.The decision ILC vs. CLIC will be based on “new physics” results from LHC. If it will be in favour of CLIC, the ILC detector collaborations will move.
Detector performance requirementsof ILC / CLIC vs. those of LHC
30Winni Mitaroff: ÖPG-FAKT21 Sept. 2012
○ Inner vertex layer ~ 3 - 6 times closer to IP
○ Vertex pixel size ~ 30 times smaller
○ Vertex detector layer ~ 30 times thinner
Impact param resolution: Δd ≤ 5 μm + 10 μm / [ (p/GeV) x sin3/2 θ ]
○ Material in the tracker ~ 30 times less
○ Track momentum resolution ~ 10 times better
Momentum resolution: Δp / p2 ≤ 5 x 10-5 / GeV “barrel region”,
Δp / p2 ≤ 3 x 10-5 / GeV “forward region”
○ Granularity of EM calorimeter ~ 200 times better
Jet energy resolution: ΔE / E ≤ 0.3 /√Eo Forward hermeticity down to θ ≥ 5 - 10 mrad
Forward region of ILD_00 layout
Winni Mitaroff: ÖPG-FAKT21 Sept. 2012
ϑ = 900
36.70
25.50
16.50
11.50
80
50
10 padrows →
FTD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Very forward region:– 5.00 < ϑ < 11.50: only FTD measuremts. contributing,– Range of FTD 1 (2) starts where that FTD 6 (7) ends.Intermediate region:– 11.50 < ϑ < 25.50: complex mix of VTX + FTD + TPC,– FTD: only FTD 1 … 3, plus FTD 4 until ϑ < 16.50,– TPC: 10 pad-rows @ 11.50 … 100 pad-rows @ 25.50.Barrel + FTD 1 only:– 25.50 < ϑ < 36.70: VTX + FTD 1 + SIT + TPC.ETD: ignored by track fitting (no more precision)– 9.80 < ϑ < 36.90: PR link to fwd. ECAL, useful in PFA.
Pixel disks Double-sided (stereo angle) strip disks
31
Winni Mitaroff: ÖPG-FAKT
Spurrekonstruktion für FTD
Jeder Detektor ist anders Hintergrund
Paarbildung (Photonen) Pixels: aufintegrierte Events Strips: Ghost Hits
Geschwindigkeit Efficiency und Ghost Rate Wart- und Lesbarkeit
TPC
FTD
21 Sept. 2012 32
Winni Mitaroff: ÖPG-FAKT
Processors in ILD’s framework “Marlin”
21 Sept. 2012 33
For compatibility cut off criteria are needed
Cut offs rely on analysis of true tracks
Efficiency vs. ghost rate & computing time
21 Sept. 2012 Winni Mitaroff: ÖPG-FAKT 34
Winni Mitaroff: ÖPG-FAKT
Conways Spiel des Lebens
21 Sept. 2012 35